|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2004, p . 4655-4664, Vol . 186, No . 14
Response of Bacillus subtilis to Nitric Oxide and the Nitrosating Agent
Sodium Nitroprusside
|
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
We examined the effects of nitric oxide (NO) and sodium nitroprusside
(SNP) on Bacillus subtilis physiology and gene expression . In
aerobically growing cultures, cell death was most pronounced when NO
gas was added incrementally rather than as a single bolus, suggesting
that the length of exposure was important in determining cell
survival . DNA microarrays, Northern hybridizations, and RNA slot blot
analyses were employed to characterize the global transcriptional
response of B . subtilis to NO and SNP . Under both aerobic and
anaerobic conditions the gene most highly induced by NO was hmp,
a flavohemoglobin known to protect bacteria from NO stress .
Anaerobically, NO also induced genes repressed by the
Fe(II)-containing metalloregulators, Fur and PerR, consistent with
the known ability of NO to nitrosylate the Fe(II) center in Fur . In
support of this model, we demonstrate that NO fails to induce
PerR-regulated genes under growth conditions that favor the formation
of PerR:Mn(II) rather than PerR:Fe(II) . Aerobically, NO gas induced
hmp, the
B
general stress regulon, and, to a lesser extent, the Fur and PerR
regulons . Surprisingly, NO gas induced the
B
regulon via the energy branch of the
B
regulatory cascade while induction by SNP was mediated by the
environmental stress branch . This emphasizes that NO and SNP elicit
genetically distinct stress responses .
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Nitric oxide (NO) is a lipophilic, freely diffusible radical that can
inhibit enzymes, damage DNA, initiate lipid peroxidation, and
exacerbate peroxide-induced damage (49, 53,
66) . NO chemistry can be divided into those
reactions that occur between NO and biomolecules (direct effects) and
those reactions that can only occur subsequent to NO reacting with
oxygen or superoxide to form reactive nitrogen oxide species (RNOS)
(indirect effects) . Direct effects of NO include the formation of
metal-nitrosyl complexes (63) and reactions with
lipid-derived (50) and other high-energy radicals
(34) . For example, NO coordinates free or
enzyme-bound Fe(II) to form Fe-NO as described for cytochrome P450 (36,
43, 64) . Fe nitrosylation leads to altered
activity of at least two bacterial metalloregulatory proteins: Fur
and Fnr (13, 14) . Indirect
effects occur after NO reacts with either oxygen to generate N2O3
or superoxide to generate the highly reactive oxidant peroxynitrite
(OONO–) . Peroxynitrite rapidly decomposes to form nitrate
(NO3–), hydroxyl radical ( · OH), and nitrogen
dioxide radical ( · NO2) . Some RNOS have the propensity to
react with thiol groups and amines to form S-nitrosothiols and
nitrosamines .
Bacteria encounter NO from a variety of sources . Macrophages of the mammalian immune system generate NO with an inducible NO synthase as part of their arsenal employed against microbial pathogens (38, 57) . NO synthases have also been identified in some bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis (1, 2), although their function in many cases remains elusive . Denitrifying bacteria produce NO as an intermediate in the reduction pathway from nitrate to dinitrogen (33). B . subtilis is not capable of denitrification, yet it coexists with denitrifying bacteria in subsurface environments . It is therefore likely that B . subtilis has developed a targeted response to exogenously and perhaps endogenously produced NO .
Several bacterial enzymes can alleviate NO stress . The Escherichia coli flavohemoglobin Hmp has NO reductase activity under anaerobic conditions (31) and NO dioxygenase (22) or denitrosylase activity (25) under aerobic conditions; however, only the aerobic Hmp activities appear to confer NO stress resistance (20) . In addition, both E . coli and Salmonella enterica hmp mutants are hypersensitive to NO (41, 56, 57) . Nakano showed that B . subtilis hmp is regulated by ResDE, a two-component system that regulates several genes required for anaerobic growth (46) . Another hemoglobin, HbN from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, displays NO dioxygenase activity and protects heterologous hosts (E . coli and Mycobacterium smegmatis) from NO challenge (51) . In response to NO, E . coli expresses a second NO reductase (norVW) which is under positive control by the regulator NorR (21, 45) . Inactivation of norVW or norR results in an NO-sensitive mutant (30) . In addition, alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) of S . enterica, Helicobacter pylori, and M . tuberculosis protects cells from peroxynitrite insult (7, 12, 40) .
Here we investigate the physiological and genetic responses of
B . subtilis to NO (gas) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) . We
demonstrate that the NO stimulon is largely defined by hmp and
the Fur, PerR, and
B
regulons . The pattern of induction is significantly altered by the
presence of oxygen and by changes in the metal ion content of the
growth medium . Furthermore, we show that the pathway of induction for
the
B
regulon for NO (gas) is different from that for SNP .
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Media and growth conditions. B . subtilis strains were
maintained on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar, and all experiments (except
Fig . 7; see below) were conducted at 37°C in
fermentation broth consisting of 2x yeast
tryptone broth supplemented with 0.5% glucose and 0.5% pyruvate .
Kanamycin (40 µg ml–1) or spectinomycin (100 µg ml–1)
was used for selection of various B . subtilis strains . All
inoculations were made at 1% volume from an overnight culture grown
in LB or anaerobic minimal medium to an optical density at 600 nm
(OD600) of approximately 0.75 or 0.40, respectively .
|
To influence the metallation of PerR (see Fig . 8), we used
anaerobic minimal medium consisting of 40 mM potassium
morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (adjusted to pH 7.4 with KOH),
2 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 2% (wt/vol) glucose, (NH4)2SO4
(2 g/liter), MgSO4 · 7H2O (0.2 g/liter),
trisodium citrate · H2O (1 g/liter), potassium glutamate
(1 g/liter), tryptophan (10 mg/liter), 3 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24,
400 nM H3BO3, 30 nM CoCl2, 10 nM
CuSO4, 10 nM ZnSO4 . MnCl2 and FeSO4
were added at various concentrations as noted .
|
NO-saturated water solution was prepared by sparging 50 ml of water
with N2 for 30 min to remove O2 and NO gas for 30 min
in 100-ml gas-tight crimp seal vials . The resulting solution
was assumed to be 1.6 mM (at 37°C) with respect to NO (62) .
Bacterial killing by NO. Cultures were grown aerobically to an OD600 of approximately 0.3, and NO-saturated water was added as an initial bolus or at even time intervals over a 20-min period . Twenty minutes after the initial addition of NO, cells were diluted in series and 10 µl was applied to LB agar and incubated overnight prior to viability assessment . All experiments were performed in duplicate .
Microarray analyses: RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and slide hybridization. Anaerobic growth for microarray analysis was performed in 50-ml serum bottles (Bellco Glass) sealed with black butyl rubber crimp sealed stoppers as previously described (47) . Bottles were filled with 50 ml of fermentation broth and were inoculated, and the headspace was sparged with N2 and was sealed . Bottles were rotated at 37°C . At an OD600 of approximately 0.3, NO was added to a final concentration of 50 µM from gas-saturated water . After 15 min of incubation, samples were centrifuged at 9,000 rpm in a Sorval RC-5B centrifuge (when the speed attained 9,000 rpm, centrifugation was stopped) . The supernatant fraction was discarded, and the pellet was frozen and stored at –80°C . Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy minikit (QIAGEN) . Contaminating DNA was removed with a DNA-free kit (Ambion), and RNA was stored at –80°C for future use . Experiments performed under aerobic conditions were identical to those performed under anaerobic conditions, with the following exceptions . Aerobic growth experiments were performed in 250-ml flasks containing 50 ml of fermentation broth shaken at 200 rpm at 37°C . At an OD600 of approximately 0.3, 50 µM NO was added to the aerobic cultures 5 min prior to centrifugation . In some experiments, 25 µM NO was added twice to aerobic cultures with 2 min between additions and samples were harvested 5 min after the initial NO addition .
The effects of NO were analyzed by competitive hybridization of fluorescently labeled cDNA samples to DNA microarrays that contained 4,020 PCR products spotted in duplicate on each glass slide . Slide construction and labeling (using random hexamers) was performed as previously described (67, 68) . RNA preparations were used to generate both Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cDNAs, and all competitive hybridizations were performed twice to control for any differences in labeling with the two fluorophores . Because all PCR products are spotted twice on each slide, all signal intensities and calculated ratios are the averages of four values .
Microarray data analysis. Signal intensities were detected and quantified with ArrayVision software (Molecular Dynamics) and were assembled into Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft) . Mean fluorescence intensity was set to 1.0, with a value of 0.1 corresponding to background . The mean expression ratio and standard deviation were calculated as wild-type NO-treated/wild type for each experiment . Data were filtered to remove genes with high variability (standard deviation equal to or greater than the mean) .
Northern hybridization. Anaerobic growth for Northern hybridization was performed in 16-ml Hungate tubes (Bellco Glass Co.) sealed with black butyl rubber stoppers as previously described (15) . Tubes were filled with 15 ml of fermentation broth or anaerobic minimal medium, the headspace was sparged with N2, and the tubes were sealed . Tubes were gently rocked at 37°C on their sides to prevent cell aggregation . At an OD600 of approximately 0.4, SNP (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 2 mM (from a 200 mM stock solution made fresh daily) . Cells were grown in the presence of SNP for 2 h, and the cells were harvested . Aerobic growth experiments were performed in 250-ml flasks containing 50 ml of fermentation broth shaken (200 rpm) at 37°C . All other aerobic procedures were identical to anaerobic experiments .
To isolate RNA, 10 ml of bacterial culture was added to 2 ml of
95% ethanol-5% phenol (pH 4.5) on ice and centrifuged for 5 min at
5,000 rpm in a Sorval RC-5B centrifuge (4°C) . The supernatant was
discarded and the pellet was snap frozen and stored at –80°C . Total
RNA was extracted by using an RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) according to
the manufacturer's instructions . RNA was quantified by A260
with a Lambda 25 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer) . DNA probes
were constructed via PCR using HotStarTaq Master Mix kit (QIAGEN)
according to the manufacturer's instructions, using 100 pM primers
with 50 ng of CU1065 chromosomal DNA template . The temperature
profile was as follows: 15 min at 95°C (1 cycle); 30 s at 94°C;
1 min at 50 to 60°C (primer dependent); 1 min at 72°C (35
cycles); and 3 min at 72°C (1 cycle) in a Master Cycle Gradient
Thermocycler (Eppendorf) . Primers (sequences available on request)
contained either a HindIII or EcoRI restriction site for subsequent
use in the probe labeling reaction . HindIII- and EcoRI (New England
Biolabs)-restricted DNA probes were purified with a PCR cleanup kit
(QIAGEN) and were labeled with [
-32P]dATP
via Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (Klenow exo–;
New England Biolabs) fill-in of single-stranded overhangs (2 h
at 37°C) . Unincorporated [
-32P]dATP
was removed by using Nuc Away Spin Columns (Ambion) according to
manufacturer's instructions . Northern blot hybridizations were
performed using a Northern Max Northern Hybridization kit (Ambion)
with Zeta-Probe Blotting Membrane (Bio-Rad) according to the
manufacturers' instructions, except that hybridizations were
performed overnight at 50°C (42°C for the mrgA probe) and
membranes were washed two times at room temperature in 2x
SSPE (Ambion) (1x SSPE is 0.18 M
NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.7]) followed by
two washes at 50°C (42°C for mrgA probe) in 0.1x
SSPE . Northern hybridization membranes were developed on a Storm 840
PhosphorImage scanner (Molecular Dynamics) after a 12- to 24-h
exposure of a PhosphorImage screen .
RNA slot blot hybridization. Aerobic cultures were grown in 50 ml of fermentation broth and were shaken at 200 rpm at 37°C in 250-ml flasks . NO (25 µM) was added at an OD600 of approximately 0.3 and again 2 min after initial addition . Anaerobic experiments were conducted in Hungate tubes as described above and received 50 µM (final) NO at an OD600 of approximately 0.3 . Ten milliliters of culture was removed 5, 10, 15, and 25 min after initial NO addition . RNA was extracted from two independent samples for each condition and was quantified as described above . RNA samples containing 1, 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 µg were loaded onto nitrocellulose membrane (a 0.1-µg signal was used to generate Fig . 5) . Probe construction, membrane hybridization, washing, and development were as described for Northern hybridization . PhosphorImage signals were quantified by using ImageQuaNT software version 4.2 (Molecular Dynamics) .
|
Aerobic respiration assay. Oxygen utilization was monitored by
using a Digital Model 10 Controller Clark type O2
electrode (Rank Brothers, Ltd.) . Cells were grown in 50 ml of
fermentation broth to an OD600 of approximately 0.3, at
which point 10 ml of culture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm in a
Sorval RC-5B centrifuge and resuspended in 100 µl of a buffer
solution containing 50 µM MOPS (pH 7.4) and 50 µM NaCl . The cell
resuspensions were added to 2.9 ml of the same buffer solution with
30 µM glucose in an incubation chamber at 37°C . NO was added into the
reaction vessel syringe port when 75% of the initial [O2]
remained . Sodium dithionite was added to cells at the end of each
experiment to measure residual O2 .
ß-Galactosidase assays. Overnight cultures were grown in LB to late logarithmic phase and were used to inoculate 50 ml of fermentation broth in 250-ml flasks (aerobic) or 15 ml of fermentation broth in Hungate tubes (anaerobic) . Aerobic cultures were shaken at 200 rpm at 37°C and were grown to an OD600 of approximately 0.2, at which time the cultures were amended with SNP to a final concentration of 2 mM or NO to a final concentration of 50 µM (two additions of 25 µM with 2 min between additions) . Anaerobic cultures received either 2 mM SNP or 50 µM NO (as indicated) . Cells were harvested in 1-ml volumes after 15 min of incubation and were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm in an Eppendorf 5415 D centrifuge for 30 s at 4°C prior to overnight storage at –80°C . Cells were assayed for ß-galactosidase activity as previously described (42) .
Supplementary material. Complete microarray datasets are available in Microsoft Excel and Tab-delimited format at http://www.micro.cornell.edu/faculty.Jhelmann.html . This site also contains Fig . S1 .
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
Physiological effects of NO during aerobic growth. We have
measured the physiological effects of NO (gas) on B . subtilis
by following cell viability, growth rate, and respiration . To measure
effects on cell viability, NO was added to aerobically growing B .
subtilis cultures to 50 or 200 µM, either as a single bolus or
divided into a series of smaller additions spread out over 20 min .
Single additions of either 50 or 200 µM NO were tolerated with no
significant loss in viability (Fig . 1A) .
Interestingly, addition of 25 µM NO two times (2 min between
additions) led to little or no loss in viability, whereas addition of
10 µM NO five times (4 min between additions) led to a nearly
100-fold reduction in viability . Similarly, 200 µM NO was well
tolerated, whereas addition of 50 µM NO four times (5 min between
each addition) resulted in a 104-fold loss of viability
(Fig . 1A) . These results demonstrate that NO is a
much more effective cell stress agent when applied to cells over time
than as a single large addition . This effect may be due to the rapid
loss of NO that occurs via degassing in open systems (such as those
used during aerobic culture) or could reflect a process of
sensitization to the killing action of NO .
|
To measure the effects of NO on growth rate, we monitored cell
density after addition of sublethal concentrations of NO to
mid-logarithmic-phase cells . NO temporarily suspended growth of
aerobic cultures and resulted in reduced growth rates at high
concentrations . Addition of 50 µM NO as a bolus or as two 25 µM
additions with 2 min between additions slowed growth for
approximately 15 min before cultures resumed growth at rates similar
to that of an untreated control (Fig . 1B) . These
conditions produced minimal killing in the viability experiments, and
therefore the pause observed in growth rate may be the result of
reversible respiratory chain inhibition by NO (see below) . In
contrast, 50 µM NO added four times (5 min between additions)
significantly reduced the growth rate of the culture for the duration
of the experiment . NO delivery in this manner resulted in significant
killing (Fig . 1A) and may have generated culture
conditions (e.g., nitrosylation of media constituents, lysis of
cells) that resulted in poor growth for those cells that survived the
NO stress .
NO inhibits aerobic respiration by reversibly binding to cytochromes
(5, 6, 63) . To
determine if the transient inhibition of growth observed upon NO
addition correlated with inhibition of aerobic respiration, oxygen
consumption was monitored with a Clark type O2 electrode .
The addition of 25 µM NO to actively respiring cells resulted in a
temporary inhibition of respiration (7 min in duration), after which
respiration resumed at pretreatment rates (Fig . 2) .
Interestingly, 50 µM NO inhibited respiration for approximately the
same time period (7 min) . After respiration resumed, a steady
decrease in rate was observed with
40
µM O2 remaining unrespired . This suggests that 50 µM NO
addition caused some irreversible damage to the cells, possibly from
RNOS formed during the experiment, which damaged the cells in a
time-dependent manner . Alternatively, the high-affinity aerobic
respiratory system, characterized by two bd-type cytochrome
oxidases (61, 65), may have been
irreversibly damaged while inhibition of the lower affinity systems,
characterized by two heme-copper-type cytochrome oxidases
(cytochromes aa3 and caa3) (59,
61), was temporary . Indeed, NO-induced damage may account
for the aerobic induction by NO of two genes (cydC and cydD)
involved with the synthesis of one of the bd-type cytochrome
oxidases (65) (Table 1) .
|
|
These results suggest that transient growth arrest by NO could be due
to inhibition of respiration . However, it is important to note that
the respiration inhibition experiments were performed in a closed
vessel without continual aeration . Therefore, degassing of NO was
prevented and all added NO was available to react with O2
and cellular material contained in the system . In contrast, cell
viability and aerobic growth inhibition experiments were conducted in
an open system . This difference in experimental conditions
undoubtedly has an effect on the kinetics of RNOS formation, and
therefore caution is warranted when comparing these results .
Physiological effects of NO: anaerobic growth. Under anaerobic (fermentative) conditions, NO impaired growth in direct correlation to the amount of NO added (Fig . 1C) . NO (50 µM) had little effect on anaerobic growth, whereas 100 and 200 µM NO significantly decreased both growth rate and final cell yield . Note that under the closed culture conditions of anaerobic growth, NO is unable to diffuse out of the system or to react with O2 . While it is likely that NO inhibition of cytochromes accounts for some, if not all, of aerobic growth inhibition, during anaerobic fermentative growth respiratory chain cytochromes are not utilized . The absence of O2 further eliminates RNOS as a possible source of toxicity . It is therefore likely that direct effects of NO are responsible for anaerobic growth inhibition, perhaps via nitrosylation of thiol groups or Fe cofactors in essential enzymes .
Overview of the nitric oxide stimulons of B . subtilis. We employed DNA microarray analysis to investigate the transcriptional response of B . subtilis to NO under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions . Addition of 50 µM NO was chosen for the aerobic cultures, because this concentration leads to very little effect on cell viability (Fig . 1A) or growth rate (Fig . 1B), although it does lead to a transient inhibition of respiration (Fig . 2) and a transient growth lag (Fig . 1B) . Similarly, 50 µM NO is the highest amount tested with the anaerobic cultures that did not significantly impair growth rate and final cell yield (Fig . 1C) . Because stress responses are often transient in nature, we isolated RNA after 5 min for aerobic cultures and after 15 min for the more slowly growing anaerobic cultures . A second set of three independent microarray experiments was performed under aerobic conditions, with NO added as two 25 µM additions separated by 2 min (RNA was extracted 5 min after the initial addition) (Fig . 1S, supplemental data) . The results from all aerobic microarray experiments were in general agreement with each other .
To identify genes that are strongly regulated in response to NO
exposure, we generated scatter plots to compare the observed
fluorescence intensity (after normalization) corresponding to each
gene in the presence and absence of NO . The vast majority of genes
cluster along a diagonal line with a slope of 1.0, which indicates
that the levels of most mRNAs were unaffected by NO under these
conditions (Fig . 3) . However, in each case a
significant subset of genes were clearly induced by NO . Aerobically,
the most strongly induced genes were hmp and members of the
B
and Fur regulons, with less induction of the PerR regulon (Fig.
3A) . Under the conditions of the anaerobic experiment,
the most strongly induced genes were hmp and members of the
PerR and Fur regulons, whereas
B-regulated
genes were induced weakly if at all (Fig . 3B) . To
compare the NO stimulons in a more direct manner, the effects of NO
on gene expression (induced versus uninduced) were compared for the
aerobic and anaerobic culture conditions (Fig . 4) .
This further emphasizes that induction of the Fur and PerR regulons
is most dramatic in the anaerobic experiment, whereas induction of
the
B
regulon is most pronounced aerobically .
|
|
We confirmed and extended these microarray results by slot blot
hybridization of RNA from cells exposed to NO for 5 to 25 min (Fig.
5A to D) . The results confirm that hmp and the
PerR-regulated gene mrgA are rapidly induced by NO stress in
anaerobic cultures, with somewhat slower induction noted for the
Fur-regulated ykuO gene . As also noted in the microarray
study, induction of the
B-regulated
csbC gene is most notable under aerobic conditions .
Several other genes were induced by NO and fell outside the context of these regulons (Table 1) . The regulation of most of these genes is unclear, but we do note the appearance of one member of the Spx regulon known to be induced by the thiol-specific oxidant diamide (37, 48) . Because NO can modify reactive thiols, we tabulated the effects of NO on genes under the control of regulators that utilize reactive cysteine residues (Table 2) . For example, at least three Spx-regulated genes (48) are significantly induced by NO under anaerobic conditions . OhrR is a regulator that responds to organic peroxide stress via oxidation of a cysteine residue and represses ohrA (16) . The ohrA gene was induced by NO aerobically . Finally, the class III heat shock response, known to be induced by diamide (37), was induced by NO under aerobic conditions . These genes are regulated in part by McsA, a protein that is postulated to sense changes in redox and temperature via the oxidation of reactive cysteine residues (32, 37) . Collectively, these results suggest that the reaction of NO (and RNOS under aerobic conditions) with reactive cysteine residues contributes to the observed NO stimulons .
|
SNP induces many of the same genes as NO. SNP is a nitrosating
agent and contains an NO+ (nitrosyl) group that can be
donated to nucleophilic thiols and amines (53) . NO
can be released by SNP indirectly following nitrosation of a thiolate
group and the subsequent degradation of S-nitrosothiol (53) .
To determine whether genes induced by NO are also induced by SNP,
we performed Northern hybridizations on RNA extracted from
SNP-challenged cells . Under aerobic conditions, hmp, csbC (
B
regulon), and ykuO (Fur regulon) were induced, while under
anaerobic conditions hmp, two Fur-regulated genes (ykuO
and dhbA), and two PerR-regulated genes (mrgA and
katA) were induced (Fig . 6A to H) . To document
the selectivity of these responses, we monitored transcripts for
mntH (MntR regulon [24]) and yciC (Zur
regulon [19]) . Neither of these genes was induced by SNP
(Fig . 6I and J), demonstrating that the response of the
Fur and PerR regulons is not shared by other metal-dependent
repressor systems . In general, the transcriptional response to SNP is
considerably slower than that observed for NO and required 20
to 60 min before expression was observed . Furthermore, millimolar
concentrations of SNP (compared to 50 µM for NO) were required to
elicit a measurable transcriptional response from B . subtilis .
It is likely that SNP penetrates the cell poorly relative to NO . This
may account for the high concentration requirement and slow response
of B . subtilis to SNP . Despite these notable differences in
the dose and kinetics of the response, the overall pattern of gene
induction by SNP was in general agreement with that observed for NO
under aerobic and anaerobic conditions .
|
Induction of hmp by NO. The gene most highly induced by
NO (gas) under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions was hmp,
although its expression was almost 10-fold higher under anaerobic
versus aerobic conditions (Fig . 3, 4,
5A) . NO-mediated induction of hmp is expected given
its documented cytoprotective role against NO challenge in E .
coli and S . enterica (see Introduction) . Induction of hmp
requires the two-component system ResDE (46) .
Although ResDE was initially believed to sense anaerobiosis (35),
subsequent studies have revealed that NO is also required (46) .
In addition to hmp, the ResDE two-component system regulates
several other genes, one of which is nasD, an assimilatory
nitrite reductase subunit . Under aerobic conditions, NO induced
nasD 13.7-fold while under anaerobic conditions it was induced
8.8-fold (Table 1) . It is noteworthy that hmp
and nasD are among the ResDE-regulated genes that are most
highly induced under nitrate and nitrite respiration conditions (46) .
Induction of the Fur regulon by NO. The B . subtilis ferric uptake regulator (Fur) regulates iron homeostasis by repressing genes involved in siderophore biosynthesis and uptake under conditions of iron sufficiency (4, 8, 9, 28) . The Fur regulon is induced by NO under anaerobic conditions and, to a lesser degree, under aerobic conditions (Fig . 3, 4, 5B) . Under aerobic conditions, ykuO achieves a maximum induction of 7-fold at 15 min, while anaerobically ykuO is induced 30-fold after 25 min (Fig . 5B) .
Fur is a dimeric DNA-binding protein that requires bound Fe(II) to bind DNA (8) . Insight into the possible mechanism of NO induction of the Fur regulon has been provided by D'Autreaux et al . (14), who demonstrated that direct nitrosylation of the Fe corepressor of E . coli Fur was responsible for NO-mediated inhibition of Fur DNA binding . It is likely that the same mechanism accounts for NO-mediated Fur regulon induction in B . subtilis .
Effect of NO and SNP on fur mutants. The observation that NO and SNP induce the Fur and PerR regulons suggests that these regulons may provide a defense against NO stress . Indeed, the PerR regulon provides defense against another redox-active agent, peroxide, and includes AhpC, an enzyme with demonstrated RNOS cytoprotective properties (7, 12, 40) . Under our experimental conditions, SNP induced genes under the control of both of these metalloregulators, albeit at levels significantly lower than those observed in null mutant strains (Fig . 6C to G) .
To determine whether derepression of the Fur or PerR regulons results in resistance to NO and SNP, we monitored growth of fur and perR null mutants in the presence of NO and SNP under aerobic and anaerobic conditions . The perR mutation did not significantly affect growth in the presence of either NO (gas) or SNP (data not shown) . Surprisingly, the fur mutant was impaired in growth in the presence of either NO or SNP (Fig . 7) . Because a fur mutant contains elevated levels of intracellular iron (23), it is possible that the Fe-nitrosyl complexes formed in the presence of NO and SNP are themselves toxic to the cell . If correct, induction of the Fur regulon by NO and SNP could contribute to the impaired growth noted in the presence of these agents . Alternatively, Fur itself may act as a sink (in its metallated form) for NO . Indeed, it has been speculated that Fur may be sufficiently abundant in E . coli to act as a Fe storage protein in addition to its well-defined role as a metalloregulator (69) .
The response of PerR to NO is suppressed by Mn. PerR is a Fur homolog that negatively regulates the major vegetative catalase (katA), a Dps homolog (mrgA), an operon involved with heme biosynthesis (hemAX-CDBL), alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (ahpCF), a Zn(II) uptake system (zosA), fur, and perR (17, 18, 28) . Some, but not all, PerR-regulated genes (katA, mrgA, ahpCF, zosA) are induced by the addition of peroxide (27) or diamide (37) . In general, the subset of PerR-regulated genes that are strongly induced by oxidative stress are those that are induced by NO .
Induction patterns for mrgA were similar to those observed for the Fur-regulated gene ykuO . Under aerobic conditions, mrgA expression peaked at a value of 10-fold 15 min after NO addition, while under anaerobic conditions 40-fold induction was observed 25 min after NO addition (Fig . 5C) . Indeed, only the anaerobic induction of mrgA, katA, and zosA by NO exceeded fivefold as observed by microarray analysis, while other PerR regulon members were relatively unaffected (Table 3) .
|
In contrast to Fur, PerR can use either Fe(II) or Mn(II) in its
sensing site (17) . Furthermore, the selectivity of metal
repression varies among PerR members, with some genes repressed
by either Mn(II) or Fe(II) while others are repressed only by Mn(II)
(17) . We hypothesized that NO inactivates PerR by
nitrosylation of the bound Fe(II) corepressor, as previously
documented for E . coli Fur both in vitro and in vivo (14) .
To test this model in vivo we examined the induction of two PerR-regulated genes (katA and mrgA) by NO or SNP in defined anaerobic medium with 10 µM Fe(II) or 10 µM Mn(II) to favor either the PerR:Fe or PerR:Mn form (9, 17) . Significantly, katA and mrgA were induced by NO and SNP in the medium favoring the PerR:Fe form (Fig . 8C to F) but not when PerR:Mn was the dominant form . Furthermore, when Fe(II) and Mn(II) were both present, katA and mrgA were induced at levels similar to those observed with Fe(II) alone . This corroborates results obtained using H2O2 as an inducer, which suggested that PerR assumes the Fe(II) form when both metals are present (17) . As a control, we demonstrated that under identical culture conditions hmp was induced by NO and SNP regardless of the Fe(II) and Mn(II) levels (Fig . 8A and B) . These results provide strong evidence to support the idea that PerR exists in vivo in either a PerR:Fe or a PerR:Mn form and indicates that these two forms differ greatly in their ability to respond to NO . This extends a previously presented model proposing that the PerR:Fe form is primarily responsible for sensing H2O2 (44) .
The
B
regulon is activated by NO and SNP via different pathways. The
B
regulon includes an estimated 200 genes that are induced by entry
into early stationary phase (energy stress) or by a variety of
environmental stresses (reviewed in references 26
and 54) . Although only a subset of the
B
regulon was induced by NO under aerobic conditions, partial induction
of this regulon is commonly observed for other
B
regulon-activating conditions (26,
52, 54) . Although it is unclear which of these genes (if
any) provide cytoprotective benefits to the cell against the
effects of NO, the
B
general stress response includes dps, a ferritin-like protein
with a demonstrated role in defending against oxidative stress (39),
three catalase homologues (katB, katX and ydbD),
and other factors known to protect against redox-active agents (54) .
The activity of
B
is directly regulated by the anti-
RsbW . In response to stress, the anti-
antagonist RsbV interacts with RsbW, thereby releasing
B .
RsbV, in turn, is regulated by reversible phosphorylation .
Dephosphorylation of RsbV requires either of two PP2C phosphatases
(RsbU and RsbP) and results in activation of
B
(54) . It has been shown that the phosphatase activity of
RsbU is responsive to environmental stress while the phosphatase
activity of RsbP is induced by cellular energy stress .
To determine whether NO and SNP activation occurs by the environmental
(RsbU) or the energy stress (RsbP) pathway, the response of a
ctc-lacZ reporter was analyzed in rsbP and rsbU
mutant backgrounds (Fig . 9) . The ctc gene
encodes a
B-induced
ribosomal protein (55) and has been used
extensively to monitor the
B
general stress response . Under aerobic conditions the NO-dependent
induction of ctc-lacZ expression was greatly reduced in the
rsbP mutant, suggesting that activation is primarily dependent on
the energy stress pathway . Under anaerobic conditions NO did not
induce ctc expression . Because NO inhibits aerobic respiration
under similar conditions (Fig . 2), we suggest that
depressed ATP levels may trigger the
B
response via the energy stress branch (10,
29) .
|
Unexpectedly, SNP activated
B
induction through the environmental rather than the energy stress
pathway and induction was noted both aerobically and, to a lesser
extent, anaerobically (Fig . 9) . SNP induction of
ctc was essentially eliminated in an rsbU mutant . Thus, NO
and SNP activate the
B
general stress response through different mechanisms . It is unclear
where SNP acts within the complex environmental signal transduction
cascade . Several upstream regulators of the RsbU phosphatase have
been identified that may monitor the various environmental stresses
that induce the
B
general stress response (3, 11) . One of
these regulators, YtvA, possesses a PAS sensory domain (3)
thought to respond to redox-reactive signals, such as O2
tension and light (58), and this regulator could
also be involved in sensing SNP-induced stress . Similarly, energy
sensing by RsbP may also involve a PAS domain (60) .
These results highlight the fact that NO and SNP affect cellular
physiology in different manners .
The much stronger activation of the
B
response in aerobic conditions suggests that the active agent might
be RNOS derived from the reaction of NO with O2 and
superoxide . Alternatively, NO may preferentially activate
B
when the cell is expressing genes required for aerobic metabolism . In
an attempt to address this question, NO-saturated water and
fermentation broth were allowed to react with O2 for 5 and
15 min and were added to anaerobically grown cells in concentrations
up to 200 µM (initial NO concentration before aeration) . This did not
elicit a
B
response as judged by RNA slot blot analysis (data not shown) . While
this suggests that RNOS are not sufficient to cause a
B
response in anaerobically grown cells, the transient nature of RNOS
and the fact that they were generated in a cell-free system
complicates the interpretation .
Concluding remarks. We have explored the physiological and
genetic consequences of NO stress by using B . subtilis as a
model system . We have demonstrated that aerobic cells are most
sensitive to NO when added repeatedly over several minutes rather
than as a single bolus . This may indicate that NO-treated cells,
which experience a transient inhibition of respiration, become
sensitized to the killing action of subsequently added NO . Under
conditions that lead to minimal loss of viability, we demonstrated
that NO (gas) strongly induces hmp and the PerR, Fur, and
B
regulons . The precise set of genes induced is dependent on culture
conditions, with induction of the PerR and Fur regulons being most
pronounced anaerobically while the
B
regulon is most strongly induced aerobically . Induction of the PerR
regulon can be blocked by manganous ion, supporting a model in which
induction of the Fur and PerR regulons results from Fe(II)
nitrosylation . In general, the nitrosating agent SNP induces many of
these same regulons, but the pathways of signal transduction
responsible for NO and SNP induction of the
B
regulon are distinct .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Chester Price for generously providing us with ctc-lacZ
fusion strains used for
B
analysis . We further thank Jim P . Shapleigh and Peter S . Choi for
their invaluable advice and discussion .
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to J.H . (MCB0235255) and to M.N . (MCB0110513) .
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author . Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, Wing Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 . Phone: (607)
255-6570 . Fax: (607) 255-3904 . E-mail:
jdh9@cornell.edu .
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/ .
| REFERENCES |
|---|