|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2004, p . 1493-1502, Vol . 186, No . 5
Residues Required for Bacillus subtilis PhoP DNA Binding or RNA
Polymerase Interaction: Alanine Scanning of PhoP Effector Domain Transactivation
Loop and
|
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Bacillus subtilis PhoP is a member of the OmpR family of response
regulators that activates or represses genes of the Pho regulon
upon phosphorylation by PhoR in response to phosphate deficiency.
Because PhoP binds DNA and is a dimer in solution independentof its
phosphorylation state, phosphorylation of PhoP may optimizeDNA
binding or the interaction with RNA polymerase . We describealanine
scanning mutagenesis of the PhoP
loop and
helix 3region of PhoPC [Val190 to E214] and functional analysis of
the mutated proteins . Eight residues important for DNA binding
were clustered between Val202 and Arg210 . Using in vivo andin vitro
functional analyses, we identified three classes ofmutated proteins .
Class I proteins [PhoPI206A, PhoPR210A, PhoPL209A,
and PhoPH208A] were phosphorylation proficient and could
dimerizebut could not bind DNA or activate transcription in vivo or
in vitro . Class II proteins [PhoPH205A and PhoPV204A]
were phosphorylationproficient and could dimerize but could not bind
DNA prior tophosphorylation . Members of this class had higher
transcriptionactivation in vitro than in vivo . The class III
mutants, PhoPV202Aand PhoPD203A, had a reduced
rate of phosphotransfer and coulddimerize but could not bind DNA or
activate transcription invivo or in vitro . Seven alanine
substitutions in PhoP [PhoPV190A,PhoPW191A,
PhoPY193A, PhoPF195A, PhoPG197A, PhoPT199A,
and PhoPR200A]that specifically affected transcription
activation were broadlydistributed throughout the transactivation
loop extending fromVal190 to as far toward the C terminus as Arg200 .
PhoPW191Aand PhoPR200A could not activate
transcription, while the otherfive mutant proteins showed decreased
transcription activationin vivo or in vitro or both . The mutagenesis
studies may indicatethat PhoP has a long transactivation loop and a
short
helix3, more similar to OmpR than to PhoB of Escherichia coli.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
In Bacillus subtilis the response to phosphate deprivation is
controlled by activation of genes previously silent and repressionof
other genes whose products are antithetical to cell survivalin
phosphate-limiting conditions . At least two global systemsare
responsible for these changes, sigma B [3] and PhoP-PhoR.
PhoP and PhoR comprise a prototypical two-component system in
that the transmembrane sensor histidine kinase, PhoR, is autophosphorylated
on a conserved histidine residue in response to a signal . The
phosphoryl group is then transferred to a conserved aspartateresidue
in the N-terminal domain of the response regulator,PhoP, thus
activating PhoP for transcriptional regulation ofPho regulon genes .
PhoP
P
is known to directly regulate 31genesin seven operons [14]
and is directly or indirectly requiredfor eight additional genes [23,
24] . Among the genes that areactivated or
repressed by PhoP
P
are the genes that encode ahigh-affinity phosphate ABC transporter,
phosphatases [PhoA,PhoB, and PhoD], and biosynthetic proteins for
essential anioniccell wall polymers [teichoic acid or teichuronic
acid].
PhoP is a member of the winged helix OmpR subfamily of response
regulators based on sequence similarities of the C-terminaleffector
domains . The 240-amino-acid [aa] PhoP molecule is composedof two
functional domains, an N-terminal receiver domain consistingof 119
aa [PhoPN] and a 102-aa C-terminal effector domain [PhoPC]involved
in DNA binding and transactivation via RNA polymerase[RNAP] . A long
linker region [19 aa] connects the regulatorydomain [PhoPN] to the
output domain [PhoPC] . The receiver domainof PhoP has been
structurally characterized [5] . The structure
analysis revealed overall folds similar to those of two otherOmpR
family proteins, PhoB from Escherichia coli [7] and
DrrDfrom Thermotoga maritima [8], but
showed that there are remarkabledifferences in the ß4-
4
loop and
4
helix regions comparedto either PhoB or DrrD despite the high levels
of sequence similarityexhibited by the three proteins in these
regions . The PhoPNstructure analysis also showed that there is a
novel asymmetricassociation between PhoPN protomers that supports
the establishedDNA binding properties of PhoP . The dimer interface
betweentwo PhoP monomers involves nonidentical surfaces such that
eachmonomer in a dimer has a second surface available for further
oligomerization . DNA footprinting studies have shown that there
is cooperative binding of PhoP dimers at PhoP-activated promotersand
have revealed that both phosphorylated and nonphosphorylateddimers
can bind to the four 6-bp direct repeats, TT[A/C/T]A[C/T]A,spaced 4
to 6 bp apart that constitute the core binding regionfor PhoP at
PhoP-activated promoters [12] . PhoP footprinting
data for repressed promoters [6, 18]
suggest that oligomerizationof PhoP along the DNA extends well into
the coding region . Supportfor the physiological relevance of the
asymmetric dimerizationinterface of PhoP was obtained when mutations
designed to disruptthis interface resulted in PhoP mutant proteins
that could bephosphorylated by PhoR but could not dimerize or bind
DNA invitro and had no activity in vivo [9].
Our previous footprinting studies showed that there was cooperative
binding between PhoP dimers at PhoP-activated promoters and
that both nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated PhoP could bindto the
four 6-bp repeats that form the core binding region forPhoP,
suggesting that nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated PhoPdimers have
structural relationships in common that allow similarbinding of
their effector domains to target DNA . The fact thatphosphorylation
is required for transcriptional activation orrepression suggests
that it may enhance cooperativity for DNAbinding or interactions
with components of the transcriptionmachinery . Studies described
here were initiated to determinewhich residues of the effector
domain, PhoPC, are required forPhoP DNA binding and which residues
are required for transcriptionalregulation . For certain OmpR
homologues the purified wingedhelix domain is sufficient for DNA
binding to target DNA asa dimer [7,
15, 20] . In fact, the DNA binding domain of PhoB,
the presumed E . coli orothologue of B . subtilis PhoP, has a
higher affinity for target DNA than the nonphosphorylated intact
PhoB protein has [13] . In contrast, the DNA binding
domain ofPhoP was isolated and was shown to be a monomer in solution
that required more than fivefold more protein for DNA binding
to target DNA than nonphosphorylated intact PhoP required . In
addition, expression of PhoPC in B . subtilis could not induce
Pho regulon genes, at least in part due to the instability ofthis
domain in vivo [Chen and Hulett, unpublished data] . Forthese reasons
mutant proteins resulting from alanine scanningmutagenesis of the
PhoP
loop and the
helix 3 region of PhoPCdomain were constructed with the intact PhoP
protein for bothin vivo and in vitro functional analyses.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains and plasmids. E . coli DH5
[lab stock] and XL1-Blue [Stratagene] were usedas the hosts for
plasmid construction [Table 1] . E . coli
BL21[DE3][pLysS][Novagen] was used as the host for overexpressing
the PhoP proteins.B . subtilis JH642 and MH6110, a derivative
of JH642, were usedfor in vivo Pho induction experiments . When
required, antibioticswere added at the following concentrations: for
B . subtilisstrains, 5 µg of chloramphenicol per ml, 10 µg of
spectinomycin per ml, or 10 µg of tetracycline per ml;and for
E . coli strains, 100 µg of ampicillin per ml or50 µg of
kanamycin per ml . 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside
[X-Gal] was used at a concentration of 30 µg/ml, and isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside
[IPTG] was used at a concentration of 1 mM.
|
To construct MH6110 [
phoPR::Tetr
amyE::phoA-lacZ Spr], the chromosomalDNA
from MH5923 [amyE::phoA-lacZ Spr] was used to transform
MH5913 [
phoPR::Tetr] .
Transformants were selected on platescontaining tryptose blood agar
base [Difco] supplemented with0.5% glucose [TBABG] containing
tetracycline and spectinomycin.The representative clones were
confirmed by phenotypic screening.
To generate a B . subtilis strain with an IPTG-inducible phoPR operon, pWL29 was digested with ClaI, treated with the Klenow enzyme, and relegated, and the resulting plasmid was designated pCH101 . This plasmid was digested with BpuI102I and SphI, which removed a 178-bp fragment of the phoP gene 3' region, and then ligated with the 2.9-kbp [2,875-bp] BpuI102I/SphI fragment obtainedfrom pHT4phoPR that contained the 178 bp 3' of phoP, the completephoR gene, and 750 bp 5' of the polA gene, yielding pCH102.pCH102 was transformed into MH6110 and integrated into the chromosomeby homologous recombination . Transformants were selected forCmr and screened for Spr and Tetr . The position of homologousrecombination, 3' or 5' of the Tetr gene in chromosome, wasdetermined by PCR to be in the phoR polA region downstream ofthe Tetr gene in MH6110 . The resulting B . subtilis strain, MH6111, contains the complete phoPR operon under control of the Pspac promoter.
Plasmids similar to pCH102 but with a mutation at codons affecting PhoP amino acid residues 190 to 214 were constructed as follows.The 676-bp fragment containing the phoP gene 3' region and the phoR gene 5' region was released from pCH102 by digestion with ClaI and SacI and cloned into pBluescript KS[+] at the same sites in order to generate deltaPRKS+ . Most of the PhoP codons from the V190 codon to the E214 codon in plasmid pdeltaPRKS+were individually mutated to the alanine codon, GCG, by usinga QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit [Stratagene] andthe necessary primer pairs; the only exception was the A196codon, GCC, which was mutated to the V196 codon, GAT . Aftersequence confirmation, the 676-bp fragment with the requiredmutation was released from plasmid pdeltaPRKS+ by digestionwith ClaI and SacI and was used to replace the same region inpCH102, yielding the Pspac-controlled mutated phoPR operon with a ribosome binding site and a partial 5' polA gene . Plasmids pCH103 to pCH127 were transformed into MH6110, and representative transformants were used in in vivo experiments . The mutant strains were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing.
To construct a plasmid for overexpressing mutant PhoP proteins, the phoP gene was released from pCH01 [9] by digestion withNdeI and BamHI and cloned into pSKB3 at the same sites to generatepCH128 . The PhoP codons from V190 to E214 were individuallymutated as described above, yielding plasmids pCH129 to pCH153.For the PhoP codon substitution R113 to E113, plasmid pCH05 [9] was digested with NdeI and BamHI and cloned into pSKB3 atthe same sites to generate pCH154 . The required mutation wasconfirmed by DNA sequencing . These plasmids were transformedinto E . coli BL21[DE3][pLysS], and the representative transformantswere used to overexpress PhoP proteins.
phoA-lacZ plate assay. Low-phosphate complex medium [LPM] or low-phosphate complexmedium with 10 mM phosphate added [HPM] contained Noble agar[1.5%], X-Gal [30 µg/ml], and IPTG [1 mM] [26] . The freshtransformants generated as described above [typically 100 transformantsper construct] were selected and grown on TBABG agar plateswith antibiotics for 16 h at 37°C . The clones were thengrown on LPM or HPM agar containing X-Gal and IPTG for 16 hat 37°C.
Growth conditions and APase activity assay. Alkaline phosphatase [APase] activity was measured in cellsthat had been grown in low-phosphate defined medium [LPDM] asdescribed previously [9] with IPTG present at a concentrationof 1 mM throughout growth.
Western immunoblotting. Samples [50 ml] were taken from an
LPDM culture at 11 h . Thecells were separated from the medium by
centrifugation at 10,000x g
for 10 min . The pellet fraction was suspended in 5 ml ofTris-EDTA
containing 0.8 M sucrose, and then lysozyme was addedto the cell
suspension at a final concentration of 5 mg/ml.After the mixture was
incubated at 37°C for 10 min, thecells were collected by
centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 10
minand washed twice with Tris-EDTA containing 0.8 M sucrose . The
pellet fraction was then suspended in 5 ml of Tris-EDTA containing
0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM MgCl2
and subjected to sonication immediately . After centrifugation
at 100,000 x g for 1 h, the
supernatant fraction was used asthe soluble protein fraction . Equal
volumes of an MH5913 [
phoPR]
cell extract containing different dilutions of purified wild-type
PhoP [PhoPWT] were used to generate a standard curve . Sodium
dodecyl sulfate [SDS]-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [PAGE]
separation and immunodetection were performed as described previously
[9].
Overexpression and purification of PhoP proteins. E . coli BL21[DE3][pLysS] harboring a PhoP protein-overexpressingplasmid under control of a T7/lac promoter was incubated overnightat 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium containing ampicillin andwas used to inoculate 1 liter of the same medium at a ratioof 1:100 . The cells were grown at 30°C until the opticaldensity at 600 nm of the culture reached about 0.4 . IPTG wasthen added to the culture at a final concentration of 1 mM,and the culture was grown for another 3 h . The cells were harvestedby centrifugation at 4°C and washed with buffer A [1 M NaCl,5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.8]].The cell pellets were then suspended in 50 ml of prechilledbuffer A on ice containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluorideand were immediately subjected to sonication . Disruption of the cells was confirmed by phase-contrast microscopy . After centrifugation at 40,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C, the supernatantfraction was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size membrane[Amicon] . After 1/50 volume of 0.5 M imidazole in buffer A wasadded, the clear cell lysate was mixed with 2 ml of Ni-nitrilotriaceticacid [Qiagen] affinity resin preequilibrated with buffer A.After gentle shaking at 4°C for 30 min, the mixture wasloaded onto an Econo column [inside diameter, 2.5 cm; height,10 cm; Bio-Rad] . The column was washed with buffer A until theprotein concentrations in the elute were not detectable by theBio-Rad protein assay . The protein bound to the column was eluted by using 300 mM imidazole in buffer A . The protein fractions were dialyzed stepwise at 4°C against buffer A containing20% glycerol with decreasing concentrations of NaCl [1, 0.8,0.6, 0.4, 0.2, and 0.1 M] . The PhoP proteins were more than95% pure, as judged by SDS-PAGE.
Phosphotransfer assays. Glutathione S-transferase
[GST]-*PhoR [30], prepared in phosphorylation
buffer [50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM HEPES [pH 8.0]], was used
to phosphorylate each PhoP . Boiled glutathione beads [400 mg]
were washed with phosphorylation buffer and incubated with 200µg of
GST-*PhoR on a rocker at room temperature for 10min . The unbound
component was washed off the beads with 20volumes of phosphorylation
buffer, and the extra buffer wasremoved by microcentrifugation for
10 s . Phosphorylation buffer[0.4 ml] with 20 µl of [
-32P]ATP
[10 mCi/ml] was addedto the beads, and autophosphorylation of
GST-*PhoR was performedat room temperature for 20 min . The beads
were thoroughly washedwith phosphorylation buffer until there was no
ATP in the flowthrough.The beads bound with GST-*PhoR
P
were suspended in 0.4 ml ofphosphorylation buffer containing 50 U of
thrombin [Pharmacia]and incubated for 15 min at room temperature .
The released *PhoR
P
was recovered by microcentrifugation through a Micro Bio-Spin
chromatography column [Bio-Rad] . For phosphotrasfer reactions,*PhoR
P
was mixed with each PhoP protein at a molar ratio of1:15 in
phosphorylation buffer . After incubation at room temperaturefor 10
or 60 s or 10 min, an equal-volume sample was taken andmixed with 4x
SDS loading buffer containing 0.1 M EDTA [pH 8.0],and the sample was
applied to an SDS—10% PAGE gel.
For native PAGE experiments, PhoP proteins were phosphorylated
with GST-*PhoR
P
as described previously [9].
Determination of protein concentration. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford methodby using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit as instructed by the manufacturer.
SDS-PAGE and native PAGE. SDS-PAGE was performed as described by Laemmli [17] . A 10% polyacrylamide separating gel was used for detection of His10-PhoP . An 8% native PAGE gel was prepared as described previously [9].
Quantitation of radioactivity. Radioactivity of proteins on SDS-PAGE or native PAGE gels wasdetected with Fuji medical X-ray film [Fuji] and/or a PhosphorImager[Molecular Dynamics] . When required, the image was quantitatedwith Imagequant, version 5.1.
Gel shift assays. Gel shift assays were done as described
previously [19] . Theprobe was a 159-bp fragment
containing the phoB promoter releasedfrom pRC696 [28]
by digestion with BamHI and EcoRI and labeledwith the
Klenow enzyme in the presence of 4 µl of [
-32P]dATP
[6,000 Ci/mmol; 10 mCi/ml].
In vitro transcription assay. All components used for the
transcription reaction were adjustedto the required concentrations
and equilibrated in nuclease-freetranscription buffer [NFTB] [10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 50 mMKCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2,
0.1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol], unlessindicated otherwise . To construct a
template for the in vitrotranscription assay, the phoB
promoter region [located at positions-221 to 105 relative to the
translation start at position 1]was amplified by PCR by using
primers FMH745 and FMH746 andstrain JH642 chromosomal DNA as the
template . The PCR productwas extracted from a 1.2% agarose gel by
using a gel extractionkit [Qiagen] and was further purified by
phenol extraction andethanol precipitation . Finally, the phoB
promoter was dissolvedin NFTB and stored at -20°C . B . subtilis
A
and core RNAPwere prepared as previously described [27] .
To prepare E
A,
coreRNAP was incubated with
A
at a molar ratio of 1:30 in NFTB onice for 30 min . For each
reaction, addition of 5 µl oftemplate DNA [40 ng/µl] was followed by
addition of 1µl of ATP [1 mM], 1 µl of *PhoR [4 µM], and
1 µl of each PhoP protein [wild type or mutant; concentration,6 µM],
and the mixture was incubated at room temperaturefor 20 min . Then 2
µl of E
A
[0.5 µM core RNAP] wasadded to the reaction mixture, followed by 5
µl of a nucleosidetriphosphate mixture [500 µM ATP, 500 µM GTP, 500
µM CTP, 50 µM UTP, 0.33 µM [
-32P]UTP
[3,000Ci/mmol; 10 µCi/µl], and 4 U of RNasin per µlin
NFTB], and the mixture was incubated at room temperaturefor another
30 min . The reactions were stopped by adding 7.5µl of stop buffer [7
M urea, 100 mM EDTA, 0.05% xylenecyanol, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 5%
glycerol] and heating thepreparations at 75°C for 5 min . After
electrophoresis ona sequencing gel, the transcripts were detected by
PhosphorImageranalysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Experimental design and rationale. In this study, we set out to
identify the amino acid residuesof the PhoP C-terminal effector
domain required for DNA bindingor transcription activation, as well
as to identify residuesthat may be involved in other functions,
including protein stabilityor interdomain interactions in PhoP . To
do this, we used theQuickChange method of site-directed mutagenesis
to obtain single-alaninesubstitutions of 24 nonalanine residues of
PhoP and one valinesubstitution of alanine, which constituted the
putative transactivationloop and the DNA recognition helix . We
introduced the mutationsinto the phoPR operon residing in
plasmid pDH88 under controlof the Pspac promoter,
and the plasmids were transformed intothe chromosome of a phoPR
deletion strain via Campbell insertion[Fig . 1] . In
the resulting strains, expression of the phoPRoperon was
exclusively controlled by an inducer, IPTG.
|
Qualitative in vivo assessment of the effect of each PhoP mutation on
PhoP function. The 36-fold increase in total APase activity upon
phosphatestarvation represented the sum of the effects on three
APases,PhoA, PhoB, and PhoD, which account for approximately 65, 30,
and <5% of the total activity, respectively . The promoter-lacZ
fusion of the major APase, PhoA, was inserted at the amyE locus
in our constructs and used as a reporter of PhoP
P
transcriptionalactivity . Fresh transformants of each PhoP variant
were pickedand transferred to a TBABG plate and incubated for 16 h
at 37°C.Then the single clones were grown on HPM or LPM with IPTG
andX-Gal to assess the relative promoter activities . The colony
colors were scored after incubation of the plates at 37°Cfor
16 h . Parent strain MH6110 [
phoPR]
and strain MH6111 withan IPTG-inducible wild-type phoPR
operon were included as phoA-lacZcontrols . Figure
2A shows that under phosphate-sufficient conditions
[HPM], neither the wild-type strain nor the PhoP mutant strains
activated phoA promoter expression . Under phosphate starvation
conditions [LPM], the expression in strains having substitutionsat
PhoP residues 192, 194, 196, 198, 201, 207, 212, and 213was similar
to the phoA-lacZ expression [colony color score]in the strain
with the wild-type phoPR operon [MH6111], suggestingthat
substitutions at these residues had no effect on PhoP function.
However, strains having substitutions at residues 191, 193,195, 199,
200, 202, 203, 206, 208, 209, and 210 showed no phoA-lacZ
activity, indicating that each of these substitutions was deleterious
to the PhoP function . Strains having the remaining PhoP substitutions
exhibited decreased phoA-lacZ activity, indicating that these
residues may affect the PhoP function.
|
Quantitative in vivo assessment of the effect of each PhoP mutation on
Pho induction. To assess the Pho induction phenotype of each phoP
mutationfurther, total APase specific activity was measured for each
strain under Pi starvation conditions . Previous data showed
that in strain MH6101 expressing the phoPR operon constitutively
from the Pspac promoter, the APase specific activity
increasedsharply upon phosphate starvation and reached a maximal
valuethat was maintained as cells entered the stationary phase under
phosphate starvation conditions [9] . We took advantage
of theplateau in total APase specific activity to compare the total
APase specific activities exhibited by the strains . Samples
were taken from cultures grown in LPDM at 12 to 14 h, when thetotal
APase specific activity remained constant . In agreementwith the
plate assay data, strains having mutations that changedPhoP residues
192, 194, 196, 198, 201, 207, and 212 had levelsof APase specific
activity similar to those of strains withthe wild-type phoPR
operon [Fig . 2B], while strains having substitution
mutations that affected residues 191, 193, 195, 199, 200, 202,203,
204, 205, 206, 208, 209, and 210 each exhibited a verylow level of
APase specific activity, which was comparable tothe level of the
parental strain [MH6110
phoPR::Tetr
phoA-lacZ].The remaining mutant strains had reduced total
APase specificactivities, and the levels were less than 50% of the
level ofthe wild-type phoPR operon strain [MH6111 Pspac
phoPR] . Discrepanciesin the qualitative and quantitative
expression assays were observedfor strains containing K212, V204,
and H205 PhoP variants.
Similar PhoP concentrations [wild-type or mutant proteins] were detected in the soluble fraction of strains with phoPR expression controlled by IPTG. Because the PhoP protein concentration in cells may affect phoA-lacZand/or total APase expression during Pho induction, anti-PhoPCantiserum was used to immunodetect PhoP protein in the cells.Cells were grown in LPDM containing IPTG until the culture enteredstationary growth due to limiting phosphate concentrations andinduction of APase had plateaued . Cells were harvested, andthe proteins were extracted as described in Materials and Methods.Soluble proteins [12 µg] from each phoP mutant strainand the strain containing the wild type phoPR operon under Pspaccontrol [MH6111] were separated on an SDS-PAGE gel, blotted,and immunodetected with anti-PhoPC antiserum [Fig . 3A] . Theposition on the PhoP standard curve of PhoP in 12 µg ofsoluble proteins from MH6111 is indicated in Fig. 3B . The concentrationsof PhoP proteins induced with IPTG in strains having phoP mutationswere similar [within 5%] to the concentration of wild-type PhoPin MH6111 . The same results were obtained when lysed cell sampleswere analyzed similarly [data not shown] . Thus, the variabilityin the phoA-lacZ activities and/or the total APase activities[Fig . 2] was used to identify which residue changes affectedPhoP function.
|
In vitro phosphotransfer reactions were not altered in mostPhoP
mutated proteins, and three of these proteins exhibiteda reduced
phosphotransfer rate . To understand how PhoP functionwas affected by
each residue change, PhoP mutant proteins wereoverexpressed in E .
coli and purified by Ni-nitrilotriaceticacid affinity
chromatography so that they were >95% pure,as judged by SDS-PAGE
[data not shown] . The ability to receivea phosphoryl group from the
cognate histidine kinase PhoR wasanalyzed by using the functional
N-terminal truncated form ofPhoR, *PhoR [30] .
*PhoR
P,
free of ATP, was used for phosphotransferto each mutated PhoP .
Samples were taken after 10 and 60 s and10 min for analysis of
phosphotransfer . In general, phosphoryltransfer from *PhoR
P
to most of the mutant Pho proteins wasmaximal within 10 s and
remained stable, and there was onlya slight loss of
P
over time, which is typical of the wild-typePhoP protein [Fig.
4] . However, two Pho mutants, mutants 202and 203,
exhibited reduced phosphotransfer rates from *PhoR
P;
there was only 20% of the wild-type PhoP labeling after 10 s,
but the level increased to nearly 80% of the wild-type labelingafter
10 min . These two mutants identified residues locatedin the
C-terminal domain that might cause a defect in phosphotransfervia
domain-domain interaction . Howerver, most phoP variants
behaved like the wild-type PhoP in phosphotransfer reactions,
suggesting that the mutant proteins retained the overall structureof
the wild-type PhoP.
|
PhoP changes that affect DNA binding. To identify residues that
might be directly involved in theprotein-DNA interaction,
PhoP-promoter DNA complexes were detectedby a gel mobility assay .
The phoB promoter was chosen as thetarget because it is the
simplest of the well-characterizedPho regulon promoters, with PhoP
binding solely to the corebinding region between approximately
positions-20 and -60 upstreamof the Pho-regulated promoter . Previous
data had shown thatPhoP or PhoP
P
can bind to this promoter, although lower concentrationsof PhoP
P
[almost 25% the concentration of PhoP] were neededto bind [19] .
Using PhoPWT, we confirmed that 5 µM PhoPwas needed to
form the protein-DNA complex, while 1.5 µMPhoP
P
was sufficient [data not shown] . PhoPWT- or mutant PhoP-DNA
complexes were detected by native gel electrophoresis underthe
same conditions [Fig . 5] . Variants with mutations that created
residue substitutions at positions 202, 203, 204, 205, 206,
208, 209, and 210 did not form complexes at the concentrationsused,
while other PhoP variants were similar to PhoPWT . These
residues may be involved in direct PhoP-DNA interactions.
|
The fact that phosphorylation of PhoP in vitro increased theDNA
binding efficiency in vitro [19] and the fact that in vivo
a PhoR deletion strain did not express APase activity indicated
that Pho induction required phosphorylation of the response
regulator, PhoP . When the phosphorylated form of PhoP was usedto
assess DNA binding, as expected, most complexes formed ata
concentration that was approximately 25% of the required PhoP
concentration [Fig . 6] . Surprisingly, phosphorylated forms of
PhoP with residue substitutions at positions 204 and 205 formed
complexes at PhoPWT concentrations, while nonphosphorylated
forms of PhoP with residue substitutions at position 204 or205
failed to bind DNA [Fig . 5] . Taken together, the results
of the gel shift assay suggest that residues 202, 203, 204,
205, 206, 208, 209, and 210 might be involved in protein-DNA
interactions . Phosphorylation of PhoP proteins with substituted
residues at positions 204 or 205 may affect protein-DNA formationvia
a mechanism that differs from the mechanism for other PhoPproteins.
|
It has been reported that PhoP mutant proteins that cannot dimerize
are defective in binding to target DNA [9] . Native gel
electrophoresisof nonphosphorylated or phosphorylated mutant
proteins, thenative PhoP protein [dimer], and PhoPR113E
[monomer] was usedto assess the possibility that dimerization was
affected bythe residue changes between I201 and K212 [Fig.
7] . The phosphorylatedor nonphoshorylated PhoP
variants migrated at the rate of wild-typePhoP, not the higher rate
of PhoPR113E, suggesting that dimerizationwas not
affected and therefore not the reason for a DNA bindingdeficiency.
|
In vitro transcription assays with E
A
resulted in identificationof PhoP residue changes that affect
transcriptional activityand potential RNAP interaction residues . To
test the transcriptionalactivity of each PhoP mutant protein, runoff
in vitro transcriptionassays were conducted with the phoB
promoter as the template.Previous primer extension data showed that
the phoB promoterhas two transcriptional start sites, Pv
and Ps [10], which haverecently
been shown to be dependent on
A
and
E,
respectively[W . R . Abdel-Fattah, Y . Chen, and F . M . Hulett,
unpublisheddata] . Only the E
A
promoter is PhoP regulated . To simplify thereaction, only
transcription from the Pv promoter was tested.
B . subtilis core RNAP was purified and mixed with B . subtilis
A
factor that had been overexpressed in and purified from E.coli
to reconstitute active
A
holo-RNAP . As expected, PhoP DNAbinding-deficient substitutions at
positions 202, 203, 206,209, and 210 did not activate transcription
at all, while asubstitution at position 208 resulted in a decreased
level oftranscript [perhaps 25% that of PhoPWT] . In
contrast, althoughthe PhoP proteins with residue substitutions at
positions 190,191, 193, 195, 197, 199, and 200 bound DNA
efficiently, theyactivated transcription at moderately to severely
reduced levels.PhoP proteins with substituted residues at position
191 or 200yielded no detectable transcripts at all . Considering the
invivo [Fig . 2] and in vitro [Fig . 8]
data together, residues191 and 200 are probably two residues that
directly interactwith RNAP, while residues 190, 193, 195, 197, and
199 may contributeto this interaction.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Functional analysis of PhoP mutant proteins derived from alanine
scanning mutagenesis of the putative PhoPC transactivation loop[
loop] and DNA binding helix [
helix 3] showed that mutationsinvolving certain amino acid residues
between PhoPV190 and PhoPE214were essential or
important for PhoP function in vivo . In vitrofunctional analysis
revealed that all mutated proteins defectivefor DNA binding had
residue changes between PhoPI202 and PhoPE210,
while mutations involving certain residues between PhoPV190
and PhoPI200 produced proteins that had reduced PhoP function
in vivo and were unable or had reduced ability to activate transcription
in vitro [Fig . 9].
|
Distribution of PhoP residues involved in DNA binding or transactivation
appears more similar to the distribution determined for OmpR than to the
distribution determined for PhoB of E . coli. The results of our
analysis of mutations throughout the PhoPDNA binding-transactivation
domain can be compared to the resultsof a mutational analysis and
amino acid alignment of the domainsof two structurally characterized
E . coli response regulators,OmpR [21] and
PhoB [7] [Fig . 8] . The level of sequence
identitywithin the DNA binding region of the three proteins is quite
high, 47%, whereas the transactivation loop has no conserved
residues in the three proteins . The eight mutations betweenV190 and
E214 in PhoP that affect DNA binding are clusteredbetween V202 and
R210 in
helix 3, whereas the mutations affectingDNA binding of PhoB [20]
or OmpR [1, 16, 29] are
more broadlyspread throughout the corresponding region, especially
in PhoB,in which mutations in the
loop were shown to specifically affectDNA binding [20]
and in which structural analysis [7] showedthat
transactivation loop residues Val183, Glu191, and R193bind DNA . In
contrast to mutations that affect PhoP DNA binding,mutations in PhoP
that affect the transcription activation functionof PhoP were
broadly distributed throughout the transactivationloop, extending as
far C terminal as R200, a conserved residuein the three proteins
that is part of an extended
helix 3 inPhoB but is in the
loop of OmpR.
PhoP DNA binding mutants fall into three classes. One class
of PhoP DNA binding mutants, which included PhoPI206A,
PhoPR208A, PhoPL209A, and PhoPH210A, had a
phosphotransfer ratesimilar to that of the native PhoP and could
dimerize, but neitherthe phosphorylated nor nonphosphorylated PhoP
mutants couldbind DNA at concentrations appropriate for PhoPWT .
In general,the members of this class could not activate
transcription ofthe phoB promoter in vitro or of total APases
or phoA in vivo;the only exception was PhoPH208A,
which produced a weak transcriptin vitro but exhibited no
transcription in vivo . Higher concentrationsof PhoP and/or E
A
in vitro than in vivo may account for thedetectable transcriptional
activity of PhoPH208A observed invitro . The phenotype of
the mutant proteins in this class isconsistent with residues that
may directly interact with DNA.PhoB [E . coli] residues that
correspond to PhoPR210 bind DNAvia nonspecific
interactions, while the residue correspondingto PhoPH208
binds via both specific and nonspecific interactions[7] .
In addition, especially for PhoPI206A, PhoPR210A, and PhoPL209A,
the phenotype is also consistent with disruption of conserved
residues that stabilize secondary structural elements involvedin DNA
recognition, a role determined for the analogous residuesof the
E . coli ortholog, PhoB [7].
A second class of PhoP DNA binding mutants, including PhoPV204A
and PhoPH205A, also had a phosphotransfer rate equal to that
of the native PhoP and could dimerize, and the nonphosphorylated
PhoP mutant proteins could not bind DNA at concentrations appropriate
for nonphosphorylated PhoPWT; however, the phosphorylated PhoPV204A
and PhoPH205A proteins could . Transcription of phoA and
thetotal APase activity in strains with these mutant phoP
alleleswere quite low compared to those of the wild-type strain, but
in vitro phoB transcription by using PhoPH205A
Por
PhoPV204A
P
was more than 50% of the transcription observed when PhoPWT
was used . These data suggest that unlike the native PhoP [19],
phosphorylation of PhoPV204A and PhoPH205A is
required to changethe conformation of the mutant protein to allow
DNA binding[compare Fig . 5 and 6]
required for transcriptional activity,perhaps in a way similar to
either that proposed for NarL [4]and CheB [11],
in which functional regions of the effector domainsare blocked by
the regulatory domains in the nonphosphorylatedstate, or that
proposed for PhoB [7] of E . coli, in which it
has been proposed that the position of the DNA binding region
in the nonphosphorylated state prevents binding of the response
regulator to the tandem repeats of the Pho box . Both structuraland
genetic studies [2] implicated helix
5
of the receiver domainin the interdomain interactions in PhoB
negative regulation.The phosphorylation-dependent phenotype for DNA
binding of PhoPH205Aor PhoPV204A implies that
a mutation in the C-terminal DNA bindingregion of PhoP may alter the
interaction of the domain withthe PhoP N-terminal domain . A mutation
in OmpR, OmpRV203 M,at the position analogous toV204A in
PhoP, reduced DNA binding[29], and the protein
exhibited functional properties that affectedboth DNA recognition
and small-molecule phosphorylation of OmpR,leading to the conclusion
that a single mutation in the OmpRDNA binding domain affects the
N-terminal domain [31] . The E.coli PhoB
residue corresponding to PhoPV204 showed specificDNA
interactions, while residues corresponding to PhoPH205 had
both specific and nonspecific DNA binding interactions, as wellas a
structural role via hydrogen bonding to a conserved Gluresidue of
helix 1 of the DNA binding domain [7].
A third class of PhoP DNA binding mutants, including PhoPV202A and PhoPD203A, have a reduced rate of phosphotransfer, can dimerize,and do not bind DNA or activate transcription in vitro or invivo . The reduced rate of phosphotransfer may again indicate that mutations in this DNA binding class affect the PhoPN structure in addition to the C-terminal domain structure . Residues of PhoB [7] or OmpR [22] corresponding to PhoPV202 are residuesof the central hydrophobic core that maintain the tertiary structureof that domain . Residues of PhoB and OmpR analogous to PhoPD203also link secondary structural elements by hydrogen bondingto the invariant tyrosine in the C-terminal hairpin that correspondsto PhoPY231 . All mutant PhoP proteins in this class were hypersensitivecompared to native PhoP in limited proteolysis experiments,which is consistent with the importance of these residues instabilization of the native PhoP conformation [data not shown].
Certain mutant PhoP proteins involving PhoP residues V190 to I201 are
affected in in vivo and in vitro transcription. None of the PhoPV190
to PhoPI201 mutant proteins had phosphorylationor DNA
binding defects, although a number had transcriptiondefects . The
PhoPW191A and PhoPR200A mutant proteins could not
activate in vivo or in vitro transcription, while PhoPY193A
and PhoPF195A abolished in vivo transcription but supported
very reduced in vitro transcription compared to that of PhoPWT.
PhoPV190A, PhoPG197A, and PhoPT199A
showed reduced transcriptionin vivo or in vitro or both compared to
the transcription ofPhoPWT . These data indicate that PhoP
residues V190, W191, Y193,F195, G197, T199, and R200 are candidates
for RNAP interaction.PhoPW191A is conserved in E . coli
PhoB, in which it has beenshown to interact with the
70
subunit of RNAP [20] . PhoPR200Ais also
conserved in PhoB, in which it is implicated in DNAbinding but not
in RNAP interaction.
PhoP variants that are DNA binding proficient but are defectivein
the RNAP interaction have Ala substitutions that are broadly
distributed throughout 11 residues, from V190 to R200 [Fig.
9] . Since residues in the response regulator that contribute
to the RNAP interaction generally belong to the transactivation
loop, secondary structure considerations suggest that PhoP hasa
longer transactivation loop and is more similar to OmpR thanto PhoB
of E . coli . Mutations in PhoP that affect DNA binding[eight
of nine contiguous residues] are in the highly conservedsequence
that is part of
helix 3 in either PhoB or OmpR . WhileOmpR mutations that affect DNA
binding are confined to
helix3, PhoB residues in both the
loop and
helix 3 have been shownby mutagenesis and/or PhoB DNA structure
analysis to be importantfor binding . It is of interest to determine
the relevance ofthese observations with respect to PhoPC structure
and the PhoP-RNAPinteraction.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant
GM-33471 to F.M.H.
We thank J.-P . Samama for helpful discussions and suggestions.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author . Mailing address: Laboratory for
Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at
Chicago, 900 S . Ashland Avenue [M/C 567], Chicago, IL 60607 . Phone: [312]
996-5460 . Fax: [312] 413-2691 . E-mail:
Hulett@uic.edu .
| REFERENCES |
|---|
What Is Protein?,
What Is Water Purification?,
What Is Anthrax?,
What Is Genetic Engineering?,
What Is Nitrification?,
r,
Bacteria,
r,
Microbes,
s,
Microorganisms,
o,
Bacteriology,
a,
Microorganism,
c,
Microorganisms,
i,
Burkholderia,
n,
Antimicrobials,
n,
Pasteurella,
e,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
c,
Enterobacteriacea,
c,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Microbiological,
i,
Staphylococcus aureus,
o,
Bacteriophage,
i,
Bacteria,
i,
Bacillus subtilis,
n,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Escherichia coli,
n,
Listeriosis,
i,
Bacillus,
n,
Gram negative,
c,
Bacteria,
o,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Gram negative,
o,
Microbiological
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||