|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2004, p . 4694-4704, Vol . 186, No . 14 Delineation of Upstream Signaling Events in the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2 Transcriptional Activation PathwayCharles C . Kim* and Stanley Falkow Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305 Received 5 February 2004/ Accepted 15 April 2004
Whereas the role of SPI2 in pathogenesis is clear, the molecular mechanisms by which it enhances intracellular survival largely remain elusive . A number of effector proteins, encoded both within and outside SPI2, are secreted through the SPI2 secretion apparatus into the host cell during intracellular infection (46), but their precise functions remain undefined . SPI2 has been implicated in disruption of host processes, including modification of phagosomal trafficking, evasion of host-derived oxidative stress, and induction of late-stage host cell cytotoxicity (recently reviewed by Waterman and Holden [46]), but descriptions of molecular interactions of effectors with host proteins and/or molecular activities are limited . Our understanding of the environmental signals and regulatory pathways that lead to SPI2 expression is likewise rudimentary . SPI2 is known to be expressed by intracellular Salmonella but not by extracellular bacteria (6, 12, 16, 45), and in vitro conditions that promote expression have also been described . Shifting bacteria from Luria-Bertani (LB) medium to M9 pH 5 acidic minimal medium is known to result in activation of several SPI2 promoters (25) and an increase in transcription of some SPI2 genes (9) . Low osmolarity and an acidic pH have therefore been proposed to be the signals that activate SPI2 expression under these conditions . Several groups have also reported upregulation of SPI2 in response to cation chelation when a variety of promoter-reporter fusions (51), Western blots (8), and transcript measurement (23) were used . Magnesium has been proposed to regulate SPI2 (8), although other workers have reported that SPI2 expression is independent of the magnesium concentration (16, 25, 32) . Studies of pH as a signal suggest that acidic pH activates SPI2 (25) and alkaline pH represses SPI2 (32) . Bafilomycin, which inhibits acidification of the phagosome, also prevents intracellular SPI2 expression, but interpretation of these results is confounded by possible pleiotropic effects on other molecules, such as the divalent cation transporter Nramp1 (19) . In addition, SPI2 expression has also been reported to be independent of an acidic pH in vitro (2), indicating that further examination of pH as a signal is necessary . Other proposed signals include phosphate limitation (8), a decrease in osmolarity (25), iron limitation (51), and calcium limitation (16) . Upstream signals which activate SPI2 expression are known to be dependent on a functional OmpR protein in both intracellular and in vitro medium shift conditions (25) . OmpR is the response regulator in a two-component regulatory system in which the EnvZ sensor kinase and other molecules are used to detect and respond to the extracellular environment . OmpR is phosphorylated in response to extracellular osmolarity, and the OmpC and OmpF porins are reciprocally regulated in response to the proportion of OmpR in the phosphorylated state (34) . The cytoplasmic domain of EnvZ has been well characterized as a phosphodonor to OmpR in vitro, and the location of the envZ gene in the same operon with ompR suggests that this phosphorelay interacts in vivo . However, some reports indicate that EnvZ is not required for OmpR phosphorylation in response to high osmolarity (15, 26, 37), suggesting that OmpR can be phosphorylated by sources other than EnvZ . One known alternative phosphodonor for a number of response regulators, including OmpR, is the small metabolite acetyl phosphate . Acetyl phosphate serves as an intermediate molecule in the intracellular balance between acetate and acetyl coenzyme A, which are substrates for the reactions catalyzed by acetate kinase (ackA) and phosphotransacetylase (pta), respectively . Acetyl phosphate can directly phosphorylate OmpR in vitro (22, 30), and its ability to control expression of the OmpC and OmpF porins suggests that this phosphotransfer occurs in vivo (30) . EnvZ was previously reported to be required for intracellular expression of SPI2 (12), but the role of acetyl phosphate in intracellular induction of SPI2 and the contributions of EnvZ and acetyl phosphate to in vitro expression have not yet been examined . In addition to being required for expression of SPI2, OmpR has been shown to bind directly to the ssrA and ssrB promoters (12, 25), demonstrating that there is a direct role for OmpR in SPI2 regulation . OmpR and OmpR-P exhibit different binding affinities for the ssrA promoter, as measured by fluorescence anisotropy (12), suggesting that one form may be more active in activating transcription than the other . Mutation of envZ eliminates SPI2 promoter activity (12), suggesting that OmpR-P is the form which activates SPI2 expression, but high osmolarity (which results in OmpR phosphorylation) has also been reported to repress SPI2 expression (25) . The phosphorylation state of OmpR during SPI2 activation therefore remains unclear . Many tools have been developed during two decades of characterization of the EnvZ-OmpR phosphorelay, which is among the most extensively characterized bacterial two-component systems . We employed a number of existing and newly developed genetic tools in order to elucidate upstream events in the SPI2 signaling cascade during in vitro and in vivo activating conditions . We observed that SPI2 expression requires EnvZ but is independent of acetyl phosphate and PhoPQ under all activating conditions .
Correction of the pFMI10 (mig-10) sequence. In order to determine the promoter region contained in pFMI10 (45) for cloning into the lacZ reporter vector pCK52, we performed sequencing on the insert region of pFMI10 . The sequence obtained corresponds to coordinates 1488910 to 1489707 of the sequenced LT2 chromosome (31) . These coordinates represent the beginning-middle of sseG to the middle-end of ssaG . The insert in pFMI10 was previously reported to be the ssaH promoter (9, 24, 25, 45), but given the location of the sequenced region, it is more likely an ssaG promoter fusion . The construct is referred to as such below . Green fluorescent protein (GFP) assay of SPI2 induction. Increased expression of the ssaG-gfp promoter fusion was induced by a shift from LB medium to M9 pH 5 medium as previously described (25) . Briefly, overnight LB medium cultures were diluted 1:50 into LB medium with appropriate antibiotics . The bacteria were grown with agitation for 2.5 h and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline before resuspension in M9 pH 5 medium for 4 h . Chelator inductions were conducted in an identical fashion except that resuspension was in LB medium or M9 medium with a chelator . 2,2'-Dipyridyl (DP) (Sigma D7505), EDTA, trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (CDTA) (Sigma D1383), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) (Sigma D6518), triethylenetetraminhexaacetic acid (TTHA) (Sigma T7633), N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA) (Sigma H8126), and nitriloacetic acid (NTA) (Sigma N7642) were used at the concentrations indicated below . For tissue culture infections, 2.5 x 105 RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 24-well tissue culture dishes and infected at a multiplicity of infection of 10:1 . Extracellular bacteria were removed by washing after 1 h of infection, and the medium was replaced every hour to limit replication of extracellular bacteria as previously described (24) . The host cells were lysed at 4 h postinfection, and the collected bacteria were analyzed for levels of GFP expression . GFP was measured as previously described (25) . SPI2 was induced as described above, and GFP was quantitated with a FACS-calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickenson) and CellQuest software . Averages of the median fluorescence intensities of the replicates are reported below . Cation rank score calculation. SL1344/pFMI10 was treated as described above with CDTA, EDTA, DTPA, TTHA, HEDTA, and NTA at concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM . For each concentration, the chelators were ordered with respect to the ability to induce the ssaG-gfp fusion, as measured by flow cytometry . Pairwise comparisons of the rank of each chelator were compared to a similarly ranked list of the chelators ordered by the association constants (Ka) for a given cation . For every comparison in which the induction-based rankings matched the expected order based on Ka, a value of 1 was added to the overall score (zero for incongruous order) . The 15 total possible pairwise comparisons were tallied to give the overall rank score for each cation at each concentration of chelator . Construction of mutant strains. Gene knockouts were constructed by using the approach and plasmids of Datsenko and Wanner (7) . Deletion primers were generated for the entire genome of LT2 by using a Perl script (available from us) and are freely available at http://falkow.stanford.edu . The primer sequences have also been made available by Robert Edwards in a Red Swap primer database, which is accessible at http://www.salmonella.org . Deletions were generated in LT2/pKD46, followed by P22-mediated transduction to SL1344 . Detailed protocols for these procedures are available at http://falkow.stanford.edu . Construction of chromosomally integrated lacZ fusions. In order to construct chromosomally integrated promoter fusions which did not disrupt the primary locus, we designed an integration vector, pCK52, based on the integration technique of Ellermeier et al . (11) . Inverse PCR was used to amplify pCE37 (11) with restriction sites added between the Flp recombination target (FRT) site and the ribosome binding site of lacZ . The rrn terminator of pKD13 (7) was PCR amplified and cloned into the introduced KpnI site between the FRT site and lacZ to obtain pCK52 . Promoter regions of ssrA, ssaG, ompC, and ompF were PCR amplified and cloned into the BamHI-NheI sites of pCK52 . CK5 was constructed by the gene knockout procedure of Datsenko and Wanner by using a pKD13 template . The Kanr marker was removed by transformation with pCP20 (7) and antibiotic resistance screening to obtain CK500/pCP20 . The promoter-lacZ constructs were integrated into the hisG::FRT site of CK500 by using FLP recombinase-mediated integration as described by Ellermeier et al . (11) . Taz expression and chemiluminescent LacZ activity measurement. All experiments in which the Taz construct was used were conducted in M9 pH 7 medium . Bacteria were grown for 4 h in the presence of 1 mM aspartate as indicated below . LacZ activity was determined by using the Gal-Screen chemiluminescent substrate as previously described (24) . At the time of harvest, the optical density at 630 nm was measured by using a Bio-Tek EL 311SX microplate reader, and this was followed by permeabilization with 5 µl of chloroform and 5 µl of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate with vortexing . Fifty microliters of the permeabilized solution was added to 50 µl of freshly prepared Gal-Screen reagent (Applied Biosystems) in white 96-well plates and incubated for 60 min at room temperature . Luminescence was measured by using a Tropix TR717 microplate luminometer, was quantitated by using the WinGlow software, and was normalized for bacterial density . All experiments were performed in triplicate, and means and standard errors are reported below .
We confirmed the observed upregulation using previously characterized GFP reporter fusions to the promoter regions of ssrA, a SPI2 regulatory gene (6), and ssaG, a SPI2 secretion system structural gene (45) previously reported to be ssaH (see Materials and Methods) . We observed that treatment with DP increased GFP expression from these promoter fusions and that the response increased with chelation (Fig. 1) . The fusions were induced by chelators in both rich medium (LB medium) (Fig . 1) and minimal medium (M9 medium) (data not shown), suggesting that cation chelation alone is sufficient for SPI2 expression in vitro . These results are in accord with reports that the cation chelators DP, EDTA, and EGTA induce SPI2 expression (8, 23, 51) .
In order to confirm that the system behaves in Salmonella as it does in E . coli, we tested regulation of the ompC and ompF porin gene promoters of Salmonella by Taz of E . coli . We observed that Taz activation reciprocally regulates expression of ompC and ompF as it does in E . coli (10, 20, 44): addition of aspartate upregulates expression from the ompC promoter and downregulates expression from the ompF promoter (Fig. 3A) . Moreover, the Taz(T247R) superkinase, which constitutively phosphorylates OmpR (10, 20), exhibits further elevated levels of ompC and repressed levels of ompF promoter activity but is unresponsive to aspartate, indicating that the system behaves in Salmonella as it does in E . coli .
We observed that induction of an ssaG-gfp fusion by EDTA was greatly reduced in the envZ mutant (Fig . 4A), indicating that EnvZ is necessary for induction of SPI2 expression by chelators . This deficiency was not due to the mutant having increased susceptibility to EDTA because expression of a constitutive rpsM-gfp fusion in the envZ background was not affected by EDTA treatment (data not shown) . In contrast to the envZ mutant, the ackA-pta mutant was not defective in ssaG-gfp expression, indicating that acetyl phosphate is not required for SPI2 expression in the presence of EnvZ . A double mutant having mutations in envZ and ackA-pta had induction properties similar to those of the envZ mutant, further demonstrating the importance of envZ in SPI2 activation . As in medium shift (25) and macrophage induction (45) experiments, expression of ssaG in response to cation chelation is also dependent on a functional ssrAB (Fig . 4A) . The ssrA-gfp fusion displayed a similar pattern of activity: induction by chelators was abolished in the envZ and envZ ackA-pta mutants but was not compromised in the ackA-pta mutant (data not shown) . These results indicate that EnvZ, but not acetyl phosphate, is required for SPI2 induction by chelator treatment . SPI2 promoter fusions to GFP are upregulated (25), and the abundance of SPI2 mRNA transcripts increases (9), in response to a shift from LB medium to M9 pH 5 medium . We examined the role of EnvZ and acetyl phosphate in SPI2 expression under these inducing conditions . As in the case of EDTA induction, we observed that EnvZ is required for induction of ssaG-gfp by medium shift (Fig . 4B) . We again observed that the ssaG-gfp reporter exhibited no defect in activation in the ackA-pta background, demonstrating that the absence of acetyl phosphate does not have a significant effect on SPI2 induction by medium shift . The envZ ackA-pta double mutant behaved like the envZ single mutant . The ssrA-gfp fusion exhibited an expression pattern similar to that of the ssaG-gfp fusion (data not shown) . These results confirm that EnvZ is required for activation of SPI2 by medium shift and that acetyl phosphate is not required . PhoP is not required for activation of SPI2 in the presence of OmpR-P. There have been conflicting reports regarding the role of PhoP in regulation of SPI2 (8, 25, 32) . We observed that treatment with 12.5 mM EDTA induced ssaG-gfp expression in wild-type and fur mutant strains but not in ompR and phoP mutant strains (data not shown) . However, phoP mutants were highly sensitive to treatment with EDTA compared to wild-type, fur, and ompR mutants (data not shown) and could therefore have been unresponsive due to toxicity rather than to genuine regulatory effects . Because the Taz system can be used under conditions that do not cause any toxicity to a phoP mutant (growth in M9 minimal medium at pH 7), we utilized this system with the chromosomal ssrA-lacZ fusions to examine the role of phoP in SPI2 regulation . As previously observed, the ssrA-lacZ fusion exhibited increased expression in response to addition of aspartate and in the Taz(T247R) superkinase strain (Fig . 3B and 5) . An isogenic strain with a mutation in phoP was constructed and observed for Taz-dependent regulation of the ssrA promoter . We observed almost identical behaviors with the wild-type and phoP mutant backgrounds with regard to aspartate and superkinase responsiveness (Fig . 5) (the Pearson correlation value was 0.994 for the four expression values for each strain), indicating that PhoP is not required for OmpR-dependent induction of ssrA expression .
We previously reported that SPI2 is significantly overrepresented in a set of genes that are upregulated in response to treatment with the cation chelator DP, as detected by microarray analysis (23) . We confirmed that SPI2 expression is activated by DP treatment using GFP reporter fusions to a regulatory gene promoter (ssrA) and a structural gene promoter (ssaG) (Fig . 1) . Additionally, we observed that these responses are not specific to DP but are also induced by other cation chelators, such as EDTA, EGTA, and CDTA (Table 2 and data not shown) . These results are in accord with the reports of Deiwick et al . (8) and Zaharik et al . (51), who described SPI2 responses to 6 mM EGTA and 250 µM DP treatment, respectively . A number of investigators have examined the nature of the signal which regulates SPI2, but the results have been conflicting . Deiwick et al . reported dependence of SPI2 expression on Mg(II) (8), but more recent results contradict the earlier observations (16, 25, 32) . Zaharik et al . reported that Fe(II) was responsible for SPI2 regulation based on its ability to repress SPI2 induction by DP (51) . We conducted a similar experiment using the chelator CDTA to induce SPI2 and various metal salts to repress expression . Our data demonstrate that the degree of repression correlates well with the association constant for the cation-chelator complex, which is strong evidence that this experimental design measures complex stability rather than specific regulation by the cation (Fig . 2) . This is especially supported by the strong repression of SPI2 expression by Pb(II), which we feel is unlikely to be a specific regulator of SPI2 expression due to the relative absence of Pb(II) in biological systems and our observation obtained with the panel of complexane chelators that Pb(II) is highly unlikely to regulate SPI2 expression (Table 2) . The ions tested by Zaharik et al . (51) also follow this trend; Fe(II) repressed SPI2 expression more strongly than Mg(II) or Mn(II) repressed SPI2 expression, which is consistent with our expectations from the Kas of these cations with DP [log Ka(Fe) = 9.55, log Ka(Mg) = 0.5, and log Ka(Mn) = 2.62l (5)] . While it is still possible that iron plays a role in regulating SPI2 expression, our data indicate that there is not enough evidence to draw this conclusion and, moreover, that caution must be exercised in interpreting data obtained with the add-back experimental design . The add-back experimental design and interpretation are fairly commonly employed . For example, EGTA is often used as a calcium-specific chelator (8), although it has a higher association constant with Fe(III) (log Ka = 20.5) than with Ca(II) (log Ka = 11.00) (5) . The source of misinterpretation is presumably an inappropriate extension of the observation that EGTA has a higher affinity for Ca(II) than other common chelators, such as EDTA (log Ka = 10.96), DTPA (log Ka = 10.74), and HEDTA (log Ka = 8.14), have and therefore chelates more Ca(II) at a given chelator concentration . At this time it is not possible to eliminate the bioavailability of individual cation species, so better technical and/or creative methods are needed to precisely identify the cation(s) to which SPI2 gene expression responds . We feel that our complexane-based prediction that Ca(II), Mg(II), Co(II), Mn(II), and/or Ni(II) regulates SPI2 (Table 2), while still only approximate, is the most accurate estimate to date . We note that Garmendia et al . reported upregulation of SPI2 by an absence of Ca(II) (16), which is consistent with our observations . In addition to cation chelation, a shift from LB medium to M9 pH 5 medium can also activate SPI2 promoter activity . Lee et al . previously demonstrated that OmpR is required for the increase in SPI2 expression and that OmpR binds to the promoter region of ssrA, the regulatory sensor kinase of SPI2 (25) . Feng et al . extended these findings by identifying additional OmpR binding sites and demonstrating that OmpR-P binds the ssrA promoter region with higher affinity than OmpR (12) . High osmolarity was reported to repress SPI2 expression, suggesting that OmpR-P represses SPI2 expression (25), but Feng et al . recently suggested that OmpR-P activates SPI2 expression based on the observation that an EnvZ mutant does not express SPI2 in macrophages (12) . In order to examine the role of OmpR phosphorylation in SPI2 regulation, we employed the well-characterized Taz hybrid sensor kinase, which phosphorylates OmpR in response to an increasing extracellular aspartate concentration (44), and the Taz (T247R) mutant, which possesses constitutive kinase activity (10, 20) . In addition to properly regulating the ompC and ompF porins in Salmonella (Fig. 3A), activating Taz kinase activity with aspartate upregulated expression of a chromosomally integrated ssrA-lacZ fusion, suggesting that OmpR-P is the form which is required for SPI2 expression (Fig . 3B) . Moreover, the Taz (T247R) superkinase strain further increased ssrA-lacZ expression, which is also consistent with the hypothesis that OmpR-P is the form which activates SPI2 expression . These results provide positive evidence that is complementary to and in accord with speculation that OmpR-P activates SPI2 expression (12) . We did not observe any evidence of SPI2 repression in our Taz experiments, but additional work is needed to resolve this possible regulatory function of OmpR-P . While OmpR-P did activate ssrA expression, an ssaG-lacZ fusion was not coordinately upregulated with ssrA, indicating that OmpR phosphorylation and expression of SsrA alone are insufficient for upregulation of downstream SPI2 genes (Fig . 3B) . This observation indicates that an additional signal(s) which is not present in the Taz growth conditions (M9 pH 7 minimal medium) is necessary for the SsrAB phosphorelay to activate expression of downstream SPI2 genes . Our observation that ssaG-gfp is upregulated in M9 pH 5 medium but not in M9 pH 7 medium suggests that pH may activate SsrAB at the posttranscriptional level . However, we note that pH cannot be the only signal for SsrAB activation because acidified LB medium is not sufficient to induce SPI2 expression (25; data not shown) . One interpretation of these observations is that SsrA regulation of other SPI2 genes requires both cation starvation and an acidic environment . Other reports also support the hypothesis that there is a role for acid regulation of SPI2; bafilomycin treatment of macrophages, which disrupts acidification of the phagosome, is reported to abrogate expression of SPI2 (6, 16), and secretion of a number of effectors is reported to occur upon medium acidification in vitro (2, 35) . However, other data indicate that acid does not play a role in regulation of SPI2; expression of the sseA and sseB SPI2 effectors is not upregulated by acid treatment (2), and vacuole acidification is not required for intracellular replication in certain cell lines (41) . Moreover, SPI2 expression can be induced in vitro by cation chelation in the absence of acidification (Fig . 4A) . Further work is clearly needed to determine whether environmental acidification is a relevant activator of SPI2 expression in vivo (41) . An alternative possibility is that the signal is not acidification per se, but rather a pleiotropic effect of acidification, such as modulation of a host molecule such as Nramp1 (19) or alteration of cation solubility or bioavailability . The host molecule Nramp1 transports cations out of the phagosome in a pH-dependent manner (19) and has been reported to affect SPI2 expression levels (51), suggesting that cation starvation mediated by Nramp1 plays a role in SPI2 regulation during vacuolar life . However, it is important to note that SPI2 is expressed at high levels and is active in Nramp1-defective cells, such as the RAW264.7 macrophage-like cell line (25, 45), and in Nramp1-defective mice, such as BALB/c mice, indicating that Nramp1 cannot be the major factor which regulates SPI2 expression in vivo . Finally, we propose the possibility that cation starvation coupled with acidification might lead to generalized activation of multiple two-component systems . The observations that cations and acidic pH activate EnvZ-OmpR (Fig. 4), PhoQ-PhoP (1), and possibly the SsrA-SsrB phosphorelays are in accord with this proposal . Careful measurement of the intracellular chemistry of the phagosomal environment and detailed genetic studies are essential to distinguish between these possibilities . OmpR can receive phosphorylation signals from at least three sources: the EnvZ sensor kinase (49, 50), the ArcB sensor kinase (28), and the small molecule acetyl phosphate (22, 29) . We observed that EnvZ is required for full expression of SPI2 by all known activating signals, including chelators (Fig . 4A), medium shift (Fig . 4B), and the intracellular environment (Fig . 6); the latter observation is also in accord with results reported by Feng et al . (12) . In contrast, a mutant with a mutation in the ackA-pta loci, which results in acetyl phosphate deficiency (30), has no defect in SPI2 expression during intracellular life or under in vitro conditions . These results indicate that while acetyl phosphate may play a role in porin regulation, it does not regulate SPI2 expression in the host environment, in contrast to EnvZ . Moreover, our results indicate that the signaling pathways which induce SPI2 expression under the three known activating conditions are identical . In a number of reports the authors have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the role of the PhoPQ two-component regulatory system in regulation of SPI2 . Deiwick et al . concluded from an analysis of secreted SPI2 proteins that PhoPQ modulates SPI2 activation (8) . Lee et al . observed that PhoPQ seemed to play a role in expression of SPI2 under magnesium limiting conditions but that PhoPQ was not required for SPI2 expression in RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells (25) . Using a luciferase reporter, Miao et al . observed that SPI2 expression was not affected by a constitutively phosphorylated PhoP in vitro or by a PhoP mutant in RAW264.7 cells (32) . On the phenotypic level, PhoPQ and SPI2 appear to contribute to systemic disease independently in mouse disease models (3), suggesting that they act independent of one another . Our results obtained by using the Taz system demonstrate that in the presence of OmpR-P, the PhoPQ regulatory system is not required for SPI2 expression (Fig . 5) . Although no instances have been reported, it is formally possible that PhoPQ could play a role in SPI2 regulation by modulating events upstream of OmpR . However, most of the data reported to date indicate that PhoPQ is unlikely to play a direct role in the regulation of SPI2 . Figure 7 shows a model of our current understanding of the SPI2 regulatory cascade . The first level of SPI2 regulation involves the EnvZ-OmpR phosphorelay, which is typically described as an osmolarity-responsive two-component regulatory system . While the cytoplasmic domain of EnvZ can phosphorylate OmpR in vitro (14), a number of reports have demonstrated that porin regulation in vivo occurs independent of the presence of EnvZ (15, 26, 37), and thus the role of EnvZ in porin regulation by osmolarity, as well as the substrate(s) for EnvZ, remain unclear . The dependence of SPI2 activation on EnvZ in response to the in vitro and in vivo conditions described here suggests that pH and cations should be examined as possible EnvZ substrates . We noted that pH signaling to EnvZ requires at least one additional signal based on the observation that pH and a shift from LB medium to M9 medium do not induce SPI2 alone but do induce SPI2 in combination . Acetyl phosphate does not regulate SPI2 expression under our conditions, but its role in regulating porins (30) suggests that two separate signaling pathways (acetyl phosphate and EnvZ) may feed into OmpR as an intermediate and result in regulation of distinct groups of genes (porins and SPI2, respectively) . The majority of the data available also indicate that the PhoPQ phosphorelay is unlikely to be directly involved in SPI2 activation .
C.K . thanks the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Stanford Graduate Fellowships Program for support . This work was funded by NIH grant AI 26195 .
What Is Activated Sludge?,
What Is Salmonella?,
What Is Bioengineering?,
What Is Biofilter?,
What Is Functional Genomics?,
n,
Bacteriology,
a,
Microorganism,
a,
Microbiology,
r,
Microbes,
a,
Bacteria,
s,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Escherichia coli,
e,
Escherichia coli,
a,
Microorganism,
r,
S. cerevisiae,
a,
Staphylococcus aureus,
c,
Klebsiella,
o,
Fermentations,
o,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
r,
Agrobacterium,
i,
Denitrificans,
c,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Campylobacter,
e,
Lactobacillus,
c,
Gram negative,
c,
Pseudomonas,
n,
Bacteriophage,
o,
Multidrug resistant,
i,
Candida albicans,
i,
Yeasts,
n,
Microflora
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||