Microbiology Reader
Equipment to run microbiology work automatically

Growth Curves of any strain.
Microbiological calculations.

Microbiology Home
Microbioloy Reader
Growth Curves
Photo Album
Microorganisms
Software
Download
Purchasing
Contact Us

Journal of Bacteriology, September 2004, p . 6032-6041, Vol . 186, No . 18

Escherichia coli Glutamate- and Arginine-Dependent Acid Resistance Systems Increase Internal pH and Reverse Transmembrane Potential

Hope Richard and John W . Foster*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, Alabama

Received 20 February 2004/ Accepted 22 June 2004


 

  ABSTRACT

 
Due to the acidic nature of the stomach, enteric organisms must withstand extreme acid stress for colonization and pathogenesis. Escherichia coli contains several acid resistance systems that protect cells to pH 2 . One acid resistance system, acid resistance system 2 [AR2], requires extracellular glutamate, while another[AR3] requires extracellular arginine . Little is known abouthow these systems protect cells from acid stress . AR2 and AR3are thought to consume intracellular protons through amino aciddecarboxylation . Antiport mechanisms then exchange decarboxylationproducts for new amino acid substrates . This form of protonconsumption could maintain an internal pH [pHi] conducive tocell survival . The model was tested by estimating the pHi andtransmembrane potential [{Delta}{Psi}] of cells acid stressed at pH 2.5.During acid challenge, glutamate- and arginine-dependent systemselevated pHi from 3.6 to 4.2 and 4.7, respectively . However,when pHi was manipulated to 4.0 in the presence or absence ofglutamate, only cultures challenged in the presence of glutamatesurvived, indicating that a physiological parameter aside frompHi was also important . Measurements of {Delta}{Psi} indicated that aminoacid-dependent acid resistance systems help convert membranepotential from an inside negative to inside positive charge,an established acidophile strategy used to survive extreme acidicenvironments . Thus, reversing {Delta}{Psi} may be a more important acidresistance strategy than maintaining a specific pHi value.


 

  INTRODUCTION

 
Enteric organisms that colonize and cause disease in the human intestine must first endure a transient but extreme acid challengein the stomach . The normal human stomach presents an antimicrobialacid environment averaging pH 2, with an emptying time of approximately2 h [53] . As a result, acid-sensitive pathogens like Vibrio cholerae must be ingested in massive numbers [10 to 100 million] to increase the possibility that some will survive and enter the intestine . Other microbes, such as Escherichia coli and Shigella, can colonize or cause disease even when small numbers of cells [10 to 100] are ingested . These resilient microbesare equipped with potent acid resistance systems able to withstandpH 2 challenge for at least 2 h [11, 31, 32, 52] . In fact, E.coli possesses a level of acid resistance rivaling that of thegastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori [39, 45, 50, 59].

It has now been shown that E . coli uses four inducible acid resistance systems to survive extreme acid environments . Acid resistance system 1 [AR1], also referred to as the oxidativeor glucose-repressed system, is acid induced in stationary phase.Its expression requires the alternative sigma factor RpoS andthe cyclic AMP receptor protein CRP [11] . However, the structural components of AR1 as well as the mechanism by which it protects are still unknown . The second AR system, AR2, requires extracellular glutamate to work at pH 2.0 and is induced upon entry into stationary phase or by log-phase growth in acidic minimal medium [10]. Known components of glutamate-dependent acid resistance include two isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase [GadA and GadB] anda putative glutamate:{gamma}-aminobutyric acid [GABA] antiporter calledGadC [11, 12, 19, 33, 46] . The third system, AR3, is similarto AR2 except that AR3 only protects cells if extracellulararginine is present . AR3 is induced by low pH under anaerobicconditions and has only been demonstrated following growth incomplex media . This arginine-dependent system is composed ofthe acid-inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA and the AdiCantiporter, which exchanges extracellular arginine for the intracellularend product of decarboxylation, agmatine [11, 15, 22, 31] . Thelast AR system was recently described as lysine dependent andprobably involves the inducible lysine decarboxylase [22].

Although it is clear that these systems protect E . coli during transient exposure to pH 2, how they actually function has been subject to speculation . It is believed that AR2 and AR3 protectthe cell from acid stress by consuming intracellular protonsduring each decarboxylation reaction [11, 14] . The siphoningoff of intracellular protons was proposed to enhance pH homeostasisand allow the cell to maintain an internal pH compatible withviability . This model suggests that a specific internal pH may be crucial for survival during exposure to extreme acid stress. If the cell's internal pH fell below that point, it would succumb. The data obtained in the present study indicate that maintenanceof a specific internal pH may not be paramount to cell survival.Survival may depend on E . coli taking an approach used by acidophiles, which is to reverse the electrical membrane potential [{Delta}{Psi}] inthe presence of extreme low pH . Converting membrane potential from negative inside to positive inside can repel protons and mitigate the excess proton motive force [PMF] that can form.


 

  MATERIALS AND METHODS

 
Bacterial strains and culture conditions. The strains used in this study included EK227, wild-type K-12;EK592, wild-type MG1655; EK590, {Delta}clcB {Delta}clcA [derived from MG1655[24]]; EF333, gadC::Tn10 [3]; EF522, gadA::pRR10 [AP] gadB::Tn10 [3]; and EF996, {Delta}uncB-C ilv::Tn10 [derived from EK227] . Mediaincluded Luria-Bertani broth [LB] and brain heart infusion [BHI]medium containing 0.4% glucose [LBG and BHIG] . LB broth, whereindicated, was buffered with either 100 mM morpholinepropanesulfonicacid [MOPS; pH 8.0] or morpholineethanesulfonic acid [MES; pH5.0] . For internal pH measurements, these media also contained25 mM sucrose to block nonspecific binding of radiolabeled sucrose[see below] . Acid challenge medium was minimal EG [58] preparedat various pH values [adjusted with HCl] . For the reasons notedabove, EG also contained 25 mM sucrose when used for internalpH measurements . To test whether Na+- or K+-deficient medium was important, Milli-Q Ultrapure water was prepared at pH 2.5 either with or without 1 mM glutamic acid · HCl . In addition,a Na+- and K+-deficient medium [M63 K/Na-deficient] containing15 mM [NH4]2SO4, 18 µM FeSO4 · 7H2O, 1 mM MgSO4,and 0.2% glucose was used . All chemicals used were ultrapure[Sigma or Fluka] or Suprapur [EM] . Na+ and K+ measurements weremade using sodium and potassium ion-specific combination electrodes[Thermo-Orion] . Cultures were grown at 37°C with shakingat 220 rpm . Exponential-phase cultures were grown to an opticaldensity at 600 nm of 0.4 [2 x 108 CFU/ml], while stationary-phasecultures were grown overnight [18 h].

Acid resistance assays. Acid resistance assays were performed as described previously[11] . Briefly, cells were grown overnight in LB MOPS and LBMES for AR1, LBG for AR2, or BHIG for AR3 . LBG was used whenstudying the glutamate-dependent system, but since argininedecarboxylase is not induced well in LBG, BHIG was used to inducethis system . Stationary-phase cultures were diluted 1:1,000into prewarmed pH 2.5 EG medium without amino acid supplementation[for AR1], with 1.6 mM glutamate [for AR2], or with 1.0 mM arginine[AR3] . At various time points, 10-µl aliquots were removedand serially diluted, and 10 µl of each dilution was platedon LB plates . CFU were determined, and percent survival wascalculated relative to time zero.

Internal pH measurements. Internal pH was estimated by measuring the distribution of aweak acid [radiolabeled salicylic acid] across the membrane[4, 8, 23] . Salicylate has been used by us and others as a reliable indicator of internal pH [13, 24, 26, 34, 47] . Control cultureswere grown to log phase [2 x 108 CFU per ml] or stationary phase[109CFU per ml] in LBG containing 25 mM sucrose [final pH attime of assay, 6.9] . Sucrose was added to prevent nonspecificbinding of radiolabeled sucrose, used later for water spacemeasurements . Cultures to test decarboxylase-dependent effectson internal pH were grown overnight to stationary phase in LBGcontaining 25 mM sucrose for AR2 measurements or in BHIG containing25 mM sucrose for AR3 measurements . Cultures were then harvestedby centrifugation and resuspended in pH 7 EG medium containingno additions or in pH 2.5 EG medium with and without 40 mM glutamateor arginine . Final cell density after resuspension was 6 x 109 CFU/ml . Two reactions were required for each assay . A totalof 2,000 to 3,000 dpm of 3H2O/µl [0.1 µCi/µl]was added to each reaction mixture . Next, 2,000 to 3,000 dpmof [14C]salicylate [56.5 mCi/mmol] was added to one tube, andthe same amount of [14C]sucrose [462 mCi/mmol] was added tothe other at time zero . At specific times [30 or 60 min], 5µl was taken from each tube for a direct isotope count,and 100-µl aliquots were centrifuged through equal amounts of dibutylphthalate [50 µl] and silicone oil [50 µl]to separate the supernatant from the cell pellet . The amountof [14C]sucrose, which does not penetrate the cytoplasmic membrane,was used to determine the extracellular and periplasmic waterspace remaining after centrifugation . Disintegrations per minutefor [14C]salicylate and 3H2O were then used to determine the internal pH value by the following equation: pHi = log{[[Ain]/[Aout]] [10pKa + 10pHout] – 10pKa}, where [A] is a measure ofsalicylic acid and the pKa is 3.0.

{Psi} measurements. {Delta}{Psi} was measured using radiolabeled lipophilic anions or cations[4, 23] . Cells were grown as for internal pH measurements . Log-phaseand stationary-phase cultures were harvested by centrifugationand resuspended in pH 2.5 EG medium containing 40 mM glutamateor 40 mM arginine . Final cell densities were approximately 6x 109 CFU per ml . Each measurement involved two assays, onefor charge distribution and one to determine water space . Thegeneral methodology was similar to that used to estimate internalpH . For charge distribution, 1,200 dpm of [14C]tetraphenylphosphoniumbromide [TPP+; 5 mCi/mmol] or potassium [14C]thiocyanate [S14CN; 54 mCi/mmol]/µl was added to one tube along with 2,000to 3,000 dpm of 3H2O . Extracellular and intracellular water spaces were determined as above . Extracellular water space was used to correct for the carryover of extracellular radiolabeled lipophilic ion not removed during centrifugation . At 30 min,5 µl was taken for total direct counts and 100 µlwas centrifuged through dibutylphthalate-silicone oil . The accumulationsof [14C]TPP+ [or S14CN] and 3H2O in cell pellets wereused to determine {Delta}{Psi} [23] by the following equation: {Delta}{Psi} = RT/zF· ln[[Aout]/[Ain]], where R is the gas constant [8.28J/K · mol], T is temperature [310.15 K], z is the chargeof the molecule [+ or –], and F is the Faraday constant[96,485 J/V · mol].

Similar assays were done with butanol-treated cells [20% butanol] to determine nonspecific binding, which was subtracted as background from the experimental results . Background counts were no morethan 10% of experimental counts.

Whole-cell decarboxylation and antiport measurements. Transport and conversion of [3H]arginine and [3H]glutamate to[3H]agmatine or [3H]{gamma}-aminobutyric acid, respectively, and thesubsequent end product efflux were measured using intact andTriton X-100-permeabilized cells . Wild-type and gadA/B and gadCmutant cells were grown for 22 h in 3 ml of BHIG [for argininedecarboxylation] or LBG [for glutamate decarboxylation] . Cellswere harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with EG medium[pH 7.0], and resuspended to 108 cells/ml in 3.0 ml of prewarmedEG medium adjusted to pH 2.5 with HCl or to other pH valuesas indicated . The medium contained 1.0 mM arginine, including4 µCi of [3H]arginine [61 Ci/mmol] per ml or a final concentrationof 0.4 mM glutamate including 22,000 dpm of [3H]glutamate/µl.At timed intervals, 500-µl aliquots of cell-free supernatantswere obtained by filtration [0.45-µm-pore-size filters]and adjusted to pH 7.5 with 5 N NaOH, and 30-µl sampleswere subjected to paper chromatographic separation as describedpreviously [29] . Marked bands were cut and counted for radioactivity.Percent conversion was calculated from total radioactivity oneach strip.

Western blot analysis and cellular location of GadC. Cells were grown overnight in 50 ml of EG pH 7.7 and EG pH 5.5.The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 x g for10 min [4°C], resuspended in 5 ml of cold 10 mM HEPES buffer[pH 7.4], and passed twice through a French pressure cell [Aminco]at 16,000 lb/in2 . Crude extracts were cleared of cell debrisby centrifugation at 4,500 x g for 10 min [two times] . The resultingcleared supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 90,000 x g [4°C]to separate membrane and soluble fractions . Membrane pellets were washed with 2.0 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer [pH 7.4] to remove residual soluble proteins and resuspended in 300 µl ofthe same buffer . Soluble fractions were also centrifuged at90,000 x g to remove residual membrane . Protein concentrationswere measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent.

Western blot analysis of these fractions was carried out using rabbit anti-GadC antibodies raised against a GadC-specific peptide [N'-CRARSPHYIVMNDKKH] by Genemed Synthesis, Inc . Membrane andsoluble fractions [3 µg of protein] were separated on10% polyacrylamide-sodium dodecyl sulfate gels [30] . Proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P [polyvinylidene difluoride] membranes with a Semiphore transfer cell [Hoefer Scientific]at 100 mA for 2 h . The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfatmilk in Tris-buffered saline [10 mM Tris [pH 8], 150 mM NaCl]containing 0.05% Tween 20 and incubated with rabbit primary[1:8,000] and mouse anti-rabbit secondary [1:8,000] antibodiesfor 1 h at room temperature . The blot was developed with ECLdetection reagents [Amersham Pharmacia Biotech].


 

  RESULTS

 
The role of Cl transporters and the F0/F1 proton-translocating ATPase in acid resistance. The goal of this study was to further define how the amino acid-dependentAR systems protect against acid stress . We initially wantedto determine how similar these systems were to the amino acid-independentsystem AR1, whose mechanism is also a mystery . An elegant studyby Iyer et al . previously demonstrated that Cl transportersencoded by the clc genes of E . coli were important for AR2 andAR3 function [1, 21] . However, their potential role in system1 was not explored . Consequently, we examined whether the Clctransporters also contributed to AR1.

Wild-type and {Delta}clcA/B cells were grown to stationary phase inLB MES pH 5.5, an inducing condition for AR1, and then testedfor survival in pH 2.5 minimal medium without amino acid supplementation[Fig . 1A] . Both strains exhibited normal AR1 survival, indicatingthat the Clc Cl transporters are not required for AR1.Our results also confirmed that the clc transporters are notessential but are important to both AR2 [Fig . 1B] and AR3 [data not shown] function . These data indicate that a fundamental mechanistic difference exists between the amino acid-dependentand -independent acid resistance mechanisms.


 

 FIG . 1 . Clc Cl transporters and acid resistance . [A] Cells [EK592 and EK590] were grown to stationary phase in LB MOPS [pH 8.0] and LB MES [pH 5.5] and diluted 1:1,000 into EG pH 2.5 without exogenous amino acids to test AR1 . [B] Cells were grown in LBG to stationary phase and diluted 1:1,000 into EG pH 2.5 medium with and without 1.6 mM sodium glutamate to test AR2.

 
Another potential contributor to acid resistance is the F0/F1H+-translocating ATPase . The F0/F1 ATPase is a well-establishedmover of protons across the cell membrane . This complex couplesthe energy released as protons move into the cell to the generationof ATP from ADP and Pi [56] . The ATPase can also function inthe opposite direction, hydrolyzing ATP to pump protons outof the cell [28, 60] . Because the basic problem of acid stressis thought to be cytoplasmic acidification, a H+ pumping system like the F0/F1 ATPase has the potential to aid in resistanceto extreme acid stress [26] . To explore this possibility, each of the three acid resistance systems was tested for its dependence on the proton-translocating ATPase by comparing the pH 2.5 resistance of an atp mutant strain to that of the wild type . The data presentedin Fig . 2A reveal that the ATPase was important for the protectionprovided by AR1 . However, AR1 was not totally dependent on theATPase, since residual survival was seen in the atp mutant.In contrast, the ATPase was not needed for AR2 or AR3 to functionproperly and did not function as a proton extruder in this situation.[Fig . 2B and C] . These results and the chloride transporterresults revealed fundamental differences between amino acid-dependentand -independent acid resistance mechanisms.


 

 FIG . 2 . The F0/F1 proton-translocating ATPase is required by AR1 . [A] Cells [EK227 and EF996] were grown in LB MOPS [pH 8.0] or LB MES [pH 5.5] to stationary phase and diluted 1:1,000 into EG pH 2.5 medium without exogenous amino acids [pH 5.5 induces AR1 function] . [B] The same cells were grown in LBG to repress AR1 and diluted 1:1,000 into EG pH 2.5 medium, with or without 1.6 mM sodium glutamate . [C] Cells were grown in BHIG to repress AR1 and diluted 1:1,000 into EG pH 2.5 medium with or without 1 mM L-arginine . *, below the level of detection.

 
These results also addressed another question . Some amino acid decarboxylation reactions in other organisms are coupled toATP synthesis carried out by the F0/F1 proton-translocatingATPase [2, 40, 44, 49] . Knowing that the ATPase is not requiredfor systems 2 and 3 indicates that any effect systems 2 or 3may have on internal pH is most likely due to the glutamateand arginine decarboxylation reactions themselves and not dueto an indirect effect on ATP synthesis.

AR2 and AR3 help acid-stressed cells maintain an elevated internal pH. We then examined if the amino acid-dependent systems [AR2 and AR3] contribute to internal pH homeostasis as predicted . Internal pH measurements were made on cells suspended at various external pH values [Table 1] . Control experiments using pH 7-grown exponential-phasecells gave an internal pH value [pH 7.8] comparable to thatin previous reports [51, 57] . Cells grown at pH 7 to stationaryphase had an internal pH of 7.6.


 

TABLE 1 . Effects of AR2 and AR3 on {Delta}{psi} during acid challenge of EK227

 
When stationary-phase cells were examined during acid stressat external pH 2.5, differences in internal pH were observeddepending on whether the cells were challenged in the presenceor absence of glutamate or arginine . In the absence of aminoacid supplementation, the internal pH was 3.6 . When glutamateor arginine was added, internal pH rose to pH 4.2 and 4.7, respectively[Table 1] . These results indicate that AR2 and AR3 do elevateinternal pH . However, the internal pH achieved was lower thananticipated . Based on studies with Salmonella, we expected thatinternal pH levels lower than pH 5.5 would be lethal [13, 43].The internal pH gained by the arginine-dependent system was higher than with the glutamate-dependent system, yet survival was somewhat lower . The difference in internal pH attained bythese different systems suggested that maintenance of internalpH is not the only element contributing to survival . AR1 andthe lysine-dependent system were not tested for effects on internalpH because viability could not be maintained above 10% overthe course of the experiments.

Internal pH levels achieved during acid stress correlate to the pH of maximal glutamate or arginine decarboxylation. Since the internal pH measured in acid-resistant cells was lowerthan anticipated, we sought another method to confirm the readings.One approach used various forms of green fluorescent protein,whose fluorescence level changes with pH . The results indicatedthat the internal pH at external pH 2.5 was below the rangeof detection with this method [pH 5] [data not shown] . Thissupported the earlier estimates . We then realized that the reportedpH optima of the decarboxylases [pH 4 and 5 for glutamate andarginine decarboxylases, respectively] seemed remarkably similarto the internal pH measurements . If this correlation held, onewould predict that decarboxylation by intact cells should bemaximal at external pH 2.5, at which internal pH [pH 4 to 5]was near the pH optima of the decarboxylases.

Before determining the pH at which intact cells maximally converted glutamate to GABA, we established that GadC serves as the antiporter for glutamate-dependent acid resistance . Previous work fromour laboratory revealed that AdiC was the antiporter for the arginine-dependent acid resistance system [11, 15, 31] . GadC,however, is only presumed to be the glutamate:GABA antiporter,based on computer sequence analysis . To provide evidence thatGadC is the antiporter, we first established that this proteinwas membrane associated [Fig . 3A] and then demonstrated thatgadC mutants would only decarboxylate glutamic acid if TritonX-100 were used to solubilize the membrane and bypass the transportrequirement [Fig . 3B].


 

 FIG . 3 . GadC is the antiporter for glutamate-dependent acid resistance . [A] Western blot assay . Cells were grown to stationary phase in minimal EG medium, and extracts were prepared with a French press . Crude extracts were separated into soluble and insoluble membrane pellets by ultracentrifugation . Samples of each fraction were electrophoresed through a 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and probed with anti-GadC antibody . [B] GadC is required for intact cells to convert glutamic acid to GABA . Cells were grown in LBG to stationary phase, washed in minimal EG pH 7.0 medium, and resuspended in EG at different pH values . Radiolabeled glutamic acid was added to suspensions of intact cells placed at pH 2.5 and to suspensions of cells permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X at pH 4.4, the reported internal pH of acid-challenged cells . Substrate [striped bars] and product [solid bars] present in filtered supernatants were separated by paper chromatography and identified by staining with 0.3% ninhydrin . WT, EK227; gadC, EF962; gadAB, EF522.

 
We then measured the extracellular pH at which intact cellscarried out maximal transport and conversion of glutamate toGABA [or arginine to agmatine] and compared those values towhat occurred with Triton X-100-permeabilized cells, where internalpH approximates the external pH . Conversion of substrate toproduct was determined using equal amounts of protein from intactand permeabilized cells, equal amounts of substrate, and equalreaction times as described in Materials and Methods . The decarboxylationof glutamate to GABA in permeabilized cells occurred maximallybetween pH 4.4 and 5 [Fig. 4B] . Under similar conditions, maximalconversion of arginine to agmatine took place between pH 5 and5.5 [Fig. 4C] . These values were in agreement with published reports of pH optima using cell extracts [5, 55] . However, thesituation was very different using intact cells, where pH homeostasismechanisms such as amino acid decarboxylation operate to alkalinizeinternal pH relative to external pH . Under these conditions,maximal conversion for both systems occurred around pH 2.5,as predicted [Fig . 4A] [11] . The results suggest that optimaldecarboxylation at external pH 2.5 by intact cells is consistentwith an internal pH between pH 4 and 5 and that the differentinternal pH values generated using glutamate versus argininemight reflect the different pH optima of the two decarboxylases.


 

 FIG . 4 . Intracellular pH optima of glutamate and arginine decarboxylases correlate to the internal pH of acid-stressed cells . EK227 cells were grown to stationary phase in LBG . Conversions of glutamate and arginine to GABA and agmatine, respectively, were carried out essentially as described in the legend for Fig . 3 . Cells, either intact or Triton X solubilized, were resuspended at different pH values, and radiolabeled substrate was added.

 
Of course, for intact cells, the external pH allowing maximal conversion is factorial, reflecting separate pH optima of transport and decarboxylation . Although it has yet not been tested, itis possible that the antiporters only activate at external pH2.5 . Thus, the optimal pH of substrate-to-product conversionby intact cells may only reflect transport . However, once theamino acids enter the cell, it seems unlikely that the decarboxylasescould cause internal pH to rise much above their pH optima.

A specific internal pH value is not required for extreme acid stress survival. Taking into consideration that the internal pH values calculatedfor AR2 and AR3 were different from one another yet both systemsprotected cells from acid stress, an experiment was performed to determine if a specific internal pH was required for survival during acid stress . Cells were acid challenged with and without glutamate, but culture conditions were manipulated such thatthe internal pH of both cultures was equal . If a given pH wereall that was required for survival, then both cultures shouldsurvive equally well . To conduct this experiment, the externalpH values of the two cultures were adjusted independently sothat the internal pH values were equivalent over the time ofthe experiment [Fig . 5A] . When this was done, cells challengedin the presence of glutamate still survived better than cellschallenged without glutamate [Fig . 5B, 60 min] . This resultsupports the hypothesis that achieving a specific internal pHvalue is not the only goal of these acid resistance systems.Since cells challenged at pH 2.5 in the presence of glutamateor arginine still generated a greater {Delta}pH than cells challengedwithout amino acid, maintenance of {Delta}pH may be of greater importanceto survival than achieving a specific internal pH value [Fig.5B, inset].


 

 FIG . 5 . A specific internal pH is not the only requirement for acid stress survival . Cells [EK227] were grown in LBG to stationary phase . A 1-ml aliquot of the culture was harvested and resuspended in 200 µl of EG pH 2.3 medium with 40 mM sodium glutamate or pH 2.7 medium without exogenous glutamate . [A] Internal pH measurements were made at 0, 30, and 60 min after acid challenge . [B] {Delta}pH [inset] and survival were measured in the presence [hatched bars] and absence [solid bars] of glutamate. {Delta}pH was calculated by subtracting the internal pH from the external pH.

 
Reversal of {Delta}{Psi} during survival under extreme acid stress. Clues as to how E . coli handles pH 2 acid stress could comefrom acidophiles, organisms that naturally live and grow underextreme acid stress . Acidophiles use a novel approach to copewith the rigors of low pH . Neutralophiles like E . coli maintainan electrochemical gradient [{Delta}{Psi}] with a negative inside chargeas part of generating PMF [16, 25] . However, the {Delta}{Psi} of acidophilesgrowing at low pH is reversed, consisting of an inside positivecharge [16, 35] . It has been proposed that this strategy helpsrepel protons and maintain a higher internal pH . In acidophiles,this is thought to be achieved by an array of transporters andion pumps that convert a negative {Delta}{Psi} to a positive {Delta}{Psi} under extremelyacidic conditions [20, 35, 37].

We hypothesized that E . coli might carry out a similar feat as a result of the decarboxylation and antiport process . Toaddress this possibility, {Delta}{Psi} values for E . coli under extremeacid stress conditions were determined . Log-phase cells at pH7 exhibited an expected negative {Delta}{Psi} [–86 mV] and a PMF of–140 mV [Table 1] . These values are somewhat lower thanin some other reports [–160 to –180 mV] due to differencesin growth media [LBG and BHIG here, versus minimal media], aeration,and the fact that these cells were fermenting rather than respiring.Stationary-phase cells at pH 7 had a somewhat lower {Delta}{Psi} [–52mV] and a PMF of approximately –100 mV . However, under extreme acid stress at pH 2.5, E . coli changed its normally negative {Delta}{Psi} to a positive {Delta}{Psi} when glutamate or arginine was present[Table 1] . Cells challenged at pH 2.5 for 30 min in the absenceof glutamate or arginine had a {Delta}{Psi} near zero . In contrast, theaddition of glutamate or arginine reversed the membrane potential,and {Delta}{Psi} became positive inside [+30 for glutamate and +80 for arginine]. Confirmation of this reversal was obtained using TPP+, which was excluded from cells when the glutamate decarboxylase system was functioning [data not shown] . The production of a positive {Delta}{Psi} in acid-stressed, living E . coli was a surprising finding,but it may explain the survival characteristics of the organism.

There has been controversy over similar studies performed using H . pylori, another neutralophilic organism that can survive extreme acid pH [36, 54] . One report indicated that H . pyloriinverts {Delta}{Psi} during extreme acid stress, similar to acidophilesand consistent with our results in E . coli [36] . The second report found that the urease this organism produces will elevate internal pH when external pH is 1.2, but in contrast to acidophiles, they did not find Helicobacter inverted transmembrane electrical potential [54] . In fact, the PMF measured was as high as –254mV . The first study was criticized by the latter one for not taking into account nonspecific binding of radioactive probes. The results presented here with butanol-treated E . coli clearly accounted for nonspecific binding and still measured a positive inside electrical potential.

Neither potassium nor sodium ions are required for glutamate- or arginine-dependent acid resistance mechanisms. Knowing that E . coli reverses its transmembrane potential raisesthe question of the source of the positive charges leading topositive inside {Delta}{Psi} . Two obvious candidates would be sodium orpotassium ions, known to contribute to pH homeostasis underother circumstances [23, 41, 42] . To address this question, cultures were grown to stationary phase in EG to induce the glutamate decarboxylase system . Cells were washed several timesin MC buffer [10 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2] to remove most residualNa+ and K+ . The washed cells were then added to pH 2.5 water[Milli-Q Ultrapure] containing 1 mM glutamic acid · HClor to M63 media containing different amounts of both ions . Therewere no significant survival differences in pH 2.5 media containingK+ concentrations ranging from 10 µM to 100 mM or Na+ concentrations ranging from 100 µM to 100 mM . After 2 h at pH 2.5, survival was maintained between 50 and 80% regardless of the Na+ or K+ concentration [data not shown] . The resultssuggest that neither Na+ nor K+ ions were required for the systemto work . The low intracellular pH [approximately 4.5] wouldlikely prevent many, if not all, other housekeeping ion movementmechanisms from working efficiently . Thus, the accumulationof the positively charged decarboxylation product most likelyaccounts for the reversal of transmembrane potential.


 

  DISCUSSION

 
E . coli is a remarkably acid-resistant neutralophilic organism that prefers growth near neutral pH but is able to withstand transient exposures to pH 2 environments for hours . Four systems contribute to this acid resistance . The two most robust systemsuse glutamate and arginine decarboxylases . Transcriptional controls regulating the synthesis of these systems have been heavilystudied; however, the mechanisms by which they provide acidresistance have not been established . The prevailing hypothesishas been that protons entering the cell are consumed by thedecarboxylase reaction via exchange with the amino acid {alpha}-carboxyl group . The decarboxylated product is returned to the exterior by antiport in exchange for more substrate [38] . The ultimate goal of this cycle would be to raise internal pH to a level that protects sensitive cell constituents . Surprisingly, Na+:H+ and potassium:H+ antiport systems, thought to be important for pH homeostasis under pH conditions more suited for growth, appeared unimportant for survival under extreme acid stress [6, 7, 9,27, 61] . The results of this work indicate that the amino acid-dependentAR systems increase internal pH and reverse transmembrane potential.Whether one feature is more important than the other is notknown.

The CO2 that evolved as a result of decarboxylation did not appear to contribute to pH homeostasis at this acid extreme. Carbonic anhydrase essentially adds water, not free protons,to CO2 to make carbonic acid [H2CO3]; carbonic acid can then dissociate to HCO3 and H+ . Because the pKa of this reactionis 6.5, an internal pH that is estimated to be between 4.2 and4.7 will prevent this dissociation [18] . Another reason carbonicanhydrase probably does not contribute to pH homeostasis atthis extreme is that the protein has an alkaline pH optimum,making it unlikely that the enzymatic formation of carbonic acid will occur at pH 4 to 5 . However, the system might contribute to pH homeostasis in the vicinity of the pKa of carbonic acid.

Although glutamate and arginine decarboxylases were shown toraise internal pH at external pH 2.5, the cytoplasm remainedremarkably acidic [pH 4.2 to 4.7] . Ordinarily, E . coli prefersto keep internal pH slightly alkaline [pH 7.8] during growth.This surprising finding was supported by two other results.First, besides using the radiolabel distribution assay, effortsto use green fluorescent protein derivatives for internal pHmeasurements indicated that the internal pH during pH 2.5 acidstress was below pH 5, the limit of detection by this method.Second, if internal pH were considerably higher than our measurementsindicated, then other amino acid decarboxylases with higherpH optima, such as ornithine decarboxylase [pH optimum 7.0],might be expected to function as effective acid resistance systems.However, ornithine decarboxylase does not protect cells at pH2.5, a finding we attribute to the high pH optimum limitingenzymatic function at the acidic internal pH reported here [3, 22] . The situation with lysine decarboxylase [CadA] furthersupports the hypothesis . This enzyme has a pH optimum of pH 5.7, which is more acidic than ornithine decarboxylase but less acidic than the arginine or glutamate enzymes [48] . Consistentwith its intermediate pH optimum, there is a lysine-dependentacid resistance mechanism, but it is much less effective thanthe glutamate or arginine systems [22].

A major advance in our understanding of acid resistance camewith the discovery that the chloride transport proteins of E.coli [ClcA and ClcB] are important [but not essential] to acidresistance [21] . In their discussion, Iyer et al . proposed that at pH 2.5, protons cross the membrane and enter the cell inthe form of uncharged HCl molecules that dissociate intracellularlyinto H+ and Cl . At the high KCl concentration used in their experiments [40 mM], that is certainly possible . The intracellular protons are then consumed by decarboxylation, and the excessCl [or other anions] is thought to be removed via theClc chloride transporters, which are thought to be channels.They proposed that these "channels" would provide an electricalshunt to prevent excessive inner membrane polarization predictedto occur, in the case of the arginine-dependent system, duringthe exchange of the intracellular decarboxylation product agmatine[+2] for the extracellular substrate arginine [+1] . In theirmodel, excessive charge, negative inside, would build in theabsence of the Clc channels . Cl exit through the channelswould prevent the cell interior from becoming too negativelycharged . Although not explicitly stated, their model impliedthat when all the systems are functioning, the resulting {Delta}{Psi} wouldstill be negative inside when external pH is 2.5 . The discovery that the Clc products are actually H+:Cl antiporterssuggests that the original model of Iyer et al . requires revision[1, 21].

We have carried out the internal pH and {Delta}{Psi} measurements neededto test the model, and we found that E . coli does not hyperpolarizebut reverses membrane potential during acid stress, mimickingthe strategy of an acidophile . We propose that the reversalof transmembrane charge by AR2 and AR3 is the direct result of proton influx combined with the production of positively charged decarboxylation products [GABA or agmatine] inside thecell . At low Cl ion concentrations [no added KCl], itis generally perceived that protons, under pH 2.5 acidic conditions, enter the cell without an associated chloride ion [Fig . 6]. If true, then proton intrusion alone would add considerablyto the positive charges inside the cell . For instance, whenthe external pH is 2.5, internal pH moves from roughly 7.5 to4.5, meaning the number of protons inside the cell [startingat 10 protons per cell at pH 7.5] increases 1,000-fold [to approximately10,000 protons per cell] . This may be enough to dissipate thenormally negative interior charge of stationary-phase cells.Movement of about 10,000 H+ ions across the membrane can changethe calculated {Delta}{Psi} by 60 mV [17] . Of course, more than 10,000 protons must enter the cell to lower pH, because many protons becomebuffered by cell constituents, which can also add to the positivecharge.


 

 FIG . 6 . Model for amino acid-dependent acid resistance . Acid stress at pH 2.5 results in illicit entry of H+, which decreases pH and increases positive charge . As pHi drops to around 5, arginine decarboxylase will start to consume protons and convert +1-charged arginine to +2-charged agmatine, further increasing the positive charge . An antiporter will not completely drain agmatine from the cell, as it is continually being made during decarboxylation . In this model, the evolution of CO2 does not contribute toward internal pH or charge since [i] the proton donor to make carbonic acid is water, not a proton; [ii] carbonic anhydrase will not function at pH 4.5; and [iii] at this internal pH bicarbonate will not form [pKa = 6.1] . The role of the Clc H+:Cl antiporter is unknown but may help expel H+, limit excess internal positive charge, and aid in returning the cell to an inside negative charge as external pH returns to neutrality.

 
At steady state in the presence of glutamate or arginine, additional protons that enter are effectively consumed by the decarboxylation reaction, which keeps internal pH near 4.5 . This consumptionremoves the proton from pH consideration, but the associatedpositive charge remains in the end product [GABA or agmatine].Although the charge is eventually removed by what is probablyelectrogenic antiport, there must always be a pool of end productin the cell to continuously drive antiport . Thus, the intracellularpool of agmatine at any one instant could be as high as halfof the original intracellular arginine pool [approximately 5to 10 mM] . This scenario is consistent with our findings.

The precise role of the Clc antiporters in this system remains unclear . Eliminating the antiporters clearly impairs acid resistance, whether high-Cl or low-Cl media are used [15] [Fig . 1B] . It would make sense if these antiporters allowedentry of Cl ions to counter the positive inside {Delta}{Psi} producedas a result of proton influx and decarboxylation, so that whenthe inside charge is positive, the Clc antiporters could allow entry of negative charges and prevent membrane hyperpolarization in the direction opposite to that predicted by Iyer et al . [21]. This would also allow excess H+ ions to be expelled from the cytoplasm in exchange for Cl.

Calculations by Iyer et al . established the conversion rateof glutamate to GABA to be approximately three times that ofarginine to agmatine within minutes of exposure to pH 2.5 [104 versus 3 x 103 molecules per min per cell, respectively] [21].This does not contradict the differences we observed in the {Delta}{Psi} measurements, where the arginine system generated 2.7 timesmore positive charge than glutamate . The apparent contradictioncan be resolved by considering the different ionizable groupson glutamate and arginine.

The {alpha}-carboxyl groups of both glutamate and arginine have pKavalues of 2.1 and, thus, they will be less than 50% protonatedat external pH 2.5 . Upon entering what is probably a less-acidicGadC antiporter channel, we predict the remaining H+ will bereleased to the periplasm, and so the group on both amino acidswould enter as COO . However, glutamate, but not arginine,also has a side chain carboxyl group with a dissociation constantof 4.3 . If the pH of the mouth of the antiporter is near externalpH 2.5 [pH 3 for instance], then this carboxyl group will bemostly protonated as it enters the cell . Once inside the cytoplasm,about half of those side chain protons will dissociate at thehigher internal pH [4.2] and then be consumed again during decarboxylationto form GABA . The result would be a futile proton cycle as wellas an electroneutral conversion . Thus, the higher reported conversionof glutamate to GABA would not generate as much internal positivecharge as the slower arginine system.

How might the cell recover from an inverted {Delta}{Psi}? In our model,as acid stress is reduced [i.e., as external pH becomes lessacidic] proton intrusion stops, but the decarboxylases continue to remove internal protons and allow internal pH to rise . The excess positive charges leading to the inverted {Delta}{Psi} are now inthe form of decarboxylation products that can be removed bythe antiporters . In the case of arginine and agmatine, a +2 is extruded in exchange for a +1 charge . As long as no moreH+ flows into the cell, this exchange combined with the importof anions by the Clc antiporters [or other means] are predictedto restore a negative inside electrical potential . Finally,normal homeostatic mechanisms take over, and the cell can resumegrowing.

How might an inside positive membrane potential aid survivalat extreme acid pH? One hypothesis is that converting membranepotential from negative inside to positive inside may be a wayto repel protons . While it is true that internal pH falls to4.2 to 4.7, the drop would be more severe without the repellingforce of a positive inside charge . However, in the experimentwhere internal pH was maintained at 4.0 with and without glutamate,the cells with glutamate survived better, arguing that the primaryrole of a positive {Delta}{Psi} would not be to repel protons to changeinternal pH . Alternatively, a positive {Delta}{Psi} might mitigate excessPMF that can form when {Delta}pH is large.

An internal pH of 4.5 and a positive inside membrane potential would be disastrous to growing E . coli cells . We propose these conditions pose only minor problems to a cell under extremeacid stress . At external pH 2.5, the internal pH of the cellis so low that very few metabolic reactions can even take place.For instance, protein synthesis is undetectable under theseconditions, and the cells clearly are not growing . As a resultof metabolic stasis, the cell could also survive a relativelyshort period of reversed transmembrane potential . The overallresult may actually protect the cell from inadvertent, self-inflicteddamage.

In sum, the results presented indicate that even though E . coli cannot grow under acidophilic pH conditions, the organism may have learned to traverse the gastric acid barrier by adoptingpart of the acidophile survival strategy . The decarboxylasesystems may protect against severe acid stress in two ways.Consuming protons by decarboxylation would produce a less acidicinternal pH and generate an inside positive potential that couldhelp repel protons and/or prevent excessive PMF.

 


 

  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health award R01-GM61147.

We thank Patricia Couling for help in preparing the manuscript.


 

  FOOTNOTES

 
* Corresponding author . Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, 307 University Blvd., Mobile, AL 36688 . Phone: [251] 460-6323 . Fax: [251] 460-7931 . E-mail: fosterj@sungcg.usouthal.edu .

 


 

  REFERENCES

 

  1. Accardi, A., and C . Miller. 2004 . Secondary active transport mediated by a prokaryotic homologue of ClC Cl channels . Nature 427:803-807.
  2. Anantharam, V., M . J . Allison, and P . C . Maloney. 1989 . Oxalate:formate exchange . The basis for energy coupling in Oxalobacter . J . Biol . Chem . 264:7244-7250 .
  3. Applebaum, D., D . L . Sabo, E . H . Fischer, and D . R . Morris. 1975 . Biodegradative ornithine decarboxylase of Escherichia coli. Purification, properties, and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate binding site . Biochemistry 14:3675-3681.
  4. Atkinson, W . H., and H . H . Winkler. 1981 . A centrifugal filtration method for the study of transport of nicotinamide adenine and pyruvate by Rickettsia prowazekii, p . 411-420 . In W . Burgerdorfer and R . L . Anacker [ed.], Rickettsiae and rickettsial disease . Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  5. Boeker, E . A., and E . E . Snell. 1972 . Amino acid decarboxylases . Enzymes 6:217-250.
  6. Booth, I . R. 1985 . Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria . Microbiol . Rev . 49:359-378.
  7. Booth, I . R. 1999 . The regulation of intracellular pH in bacteria, p . 19-27 . In R . Poole [ed.], Bacterial responses to pH . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.
  8. Booth, I . R., W . J . Mitchell, and W . A . Hamilton. 1979 . Quantitative analysis of proton-linked transport systems . The lactose permease of Escherichia coli . Biochem . J . 182:687-696.
  9. Brey, R . N., B . P . Rosen, and E . N . Sorensen. 1980 . Cation/proton antiport systems in Escherichia coli . Properties of the potassium/proton antiporter . J . Biol . Chem . 255:39-44 .
  10. Castanie-Cornet, M . P., and J . W . Foster. 2001 . Escherichia coli acid resistance: cAMP receptor protein and a 20 bp cis-acting sequence control pH and stationary phase expression of the gadA and gadBC glutamate decarboxylase genes . Microbiology 147:709-715.
  11. Castanie-Cornet, M . P., T . A . Penfound, D . Smith, J . F . Elliott, and J . W . Foster. 1999 . Control of acid resistance in Escherichia coli . J . Bacteriol . 181:3525-3535 .
  12. De Biase, D., A . Tramonti, F . Bossa, and P . Visca. 1999 . The response to stationary-phase stress conditions in Escherichia coli: role and regulation of the glutamic acid decarboxylase system . Mol . Microbiol. 32:1198-1211.
  13. Foster, J . W., and H . K . Hall. 1991 . Inducible pH homeostasis and the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium . J . Bacteriol . 173:5129-5135.
  14. Foster, J . W., and M . Moreno. 1999 . Inducible acid tolerance mechanisms in enteric bacteria . Novartis Found . Symp . 221:55-69.
  15. Gong, S., H . Richard, and J . W . Foster. 2003 . YjdE [AdiC] is the arginine:agmatine antiporter essential for arginine-dependent acid resistance in Escherichia coli . J . Bacteriol . 185:4402-4409 .
  16. Goulbourne, E., Jr., M . Matin, E . Zychlinsky, and A . Matin. 1986 . Mechanism of {Delta}pH maintenance in active and inactive cells of an obligately acidophilic bacterium . J . Bacteriol . 166:59-65.
  17. Gould, J . M., and W . A . Cramer. 1977 . Relationship between oxygen-induced proton efflux and membrane energization in cells of Escherichia coli . J . Biol . Chem . 252:5875-5882.
  18. Hakansson, K., M . Carlsson, L . A . Svensson, and A . Liljas. 1992 . Structure of native and apo carbonic anhydrase II and structure of some of its anion-ligand complexes . J . Mol . Biol . 227:1192-1204.
  19. Hersh, B . M., F . T . Farooq, D . N . Barstad, D . L . Blankenshorn, and J . L . Slonczewski. 1996 . A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli . J . Bacteriol . 178:3978-3981.
  20. Hsung, J . C., and A . Haug. 1977 . Membrane potential of Thermoplasma acidophila . FEBS Lett . 73:47-50.
  21. Iyer, R., T . M . Iverson, A . Accardi, and C . Miller. 2002 . A biological role for prokaryotic ClC chloride channels . Nature 419:715-718.
  22. Iyer, R., C . Williams, and C . Miller. 2003 . Arginine-agmatine antiporter in extreme acid resistance in Escherichia coli . J . Bacteriol . 185:6556-6561 .
  23. Kashket, E . R. 1985 . Effects of K+ and Na+ on the proton motive force of respiring Escherichia coli at alkaline pH . J . Bacteriol . 163:423-429.
  24. Kashket, E . R. 1985 . The proton motive force in bacteria: a critical assessment of methods . Annu . Rev . Microbiol . 39:219-242.
  25. Khan, S., and R . Macnab. 1980 . Proton chemical potential, proton electrical potential and bacterial motility . J . Mol . Biol. 138:599-614.
  26. Kobayashi, H. 1985 . A proton-translocating ATPase regulates pH of the bacterial cytoplasm . J . Biol . Chem . 260:72-76 .
  27. Kroll, R . G., and I . R . Booth. 1983 . The relationship between intracellular pH, the pH gradient and potassium transport in Escherichia coli . J . Biochem . 216:706-719.
  28. Krulwich, T . A. 1986 . Bioenergetics of alkalophilic bacteria . J . Membr . Biol . 89:113-125.
  29. Kumar, S., N . S . Punekar, V . SatyaNarayan, and K . V . Venkatesh. 2000 . Metabolic fate of glutamate and evaluation of flux through the 4-aminobutyrate [GABA] shunt in Aspergillus niger . Biotechnol . Bioeng . 67:575-584.
  30. Laemmli, U . K. 1970 . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4 . Nature 227:680-685.
  31. Lin, J., I . S . Lee, J . Frey, J . L . Slonczewski, and J . W . Foster. 1995 . Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli . J . Bacteriol . 177:4097-4104.
  32. Lin, J., M . P . Smith, K . C . Chapin, H . S . Baik, G . N . Bennett, and J . W . Foster. 1996 . Mechanisms of acid resistance in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli . Appl . Environ . Microbiol . 62:3094-3100.
  33. Malashkevich, V . N., D . De Biase, Z . Markovic-Housley, M . P . Schlunegger, F . Bossa, and J . N . Jansonius. 1998 . Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the beta-isoform of glutamate decarboxylase from Escherichia coli . Acta Crystallogr . D 54:1020-1022.
  34. Maloney, P . C. 1978 . Coupling between H+ entry and ATP formation in Escherichia coli . Biochem . Biophys . Res . Commun . 83:1496-1501.
  35. Matin, A., B . Wilson, E . Zychlinsky, and M . Matin. 1982 . Proton motive force and the physiological basis of delta pH maintenance in Thiobacillus acidophilus . J . Bacteriol . 150:582-591.
  36. Matin, A., E . Zychlinsky, M . Keyhan, and G . Sachs. 1996 . Capacity of Helicobacter pylori to generate ionic gradients at low pH is similar to that of bacteria which grow under strongly acidic conditions . Infect . Immun . 64:1434-1436.
  37. Michels, M., and E . P . Bakker. 1985 . Generation of a large, protonophore-sensitive proton motive force and pH difference in the acidophilic bacteria Thermoplasma acidophilum and Bacillus acidocaldarius . J . Bacteriol . 161:231-237.
  38. Molenaar, D., J . S . Bosscher, B . ten Brink, A . J . Driessen, and W . N . Konings. 1993 . Generation of a proton motive force by histidine decarboxylation and electrogenic histidine/histamine antiport in Lactobacillus buchneri . J . Bacteriol . 175:2864-2870.
  39. Mooney, C., D . J . Munster, P . F . Bagshow, and R . A . Allardyck. 1993 . Helicobacter pylori acid resistance . Lancet 335:1232.
  40. Olsen, E . B., J . B . Russell, and T . Henick-Kling. 1991 . Electrogenic L-malate transport by Lactobacillus plantarum: a basis for energy derivation from malolactic fermentation . J . Bacteriol . 173:6199-6206.
  41. Padan, E., and T . A . Krulwich. 2000 . Sodium stress . ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  42. Padan, E., and S . Schuldiner. 1996 . Bacterial Na+/K+ antiporters: molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology, vol . 2 . Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  43. Park, Y . K., B . Bearson, S . H . Bang, I . S . Bang, and J . W . Foster. 1996 . Internal pH crisis, lysine decarboxylase and the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium . Mol . Microbiol . 20:605-611.
  44. Poolman, B., D . Molenaar, E . J . Smid, T . Ubbink, T . Abee, P . P . Renault, and W . N . Konings. 1991 . Malolactic fermentation: electrogenic malate uptake and malate/lactate antiport generate metabolic energy . J . Bacteriol . 173:6030-6037.
  45. Rektorschek, M., A . Buhmann, D . Weeks, D . Schwan, K . W . Bensch, S . Eskandari, D . Scott, G . Sachs, and K . Melchers. 2000 . Acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori depends on the UreI membrane protein and an inner membrane proton barrier . Mol . Microbiol . 36:141-152.
  46. Richard, H . T., and J . W . Foster. 2003 . Acid resistance in Escherichia coli . Adv . Appl . Microbiol . 52:167-186.
  47. Rottenberg, H. 1979 . The measurement of membrane potential and {Delta}pH in cells, organelles, and vesicles . Methods Enzymol . 55:547-569.
  48. Sabo, D . L., E . A . Boeker, B . Byers, H . Waron, and E . H . Fischer. 1974 . Purification and physical properties of inducible Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylase . J . Biochem . 13:662-670.
  49. Salema, M., B . Poolman, J . S . Lolkema, M . C . Dias, and W . N . Konings. 1994 . Uniport of monoanionic L-malate in membrane vesicles from Leuconostoc oenos . Eur . J . Biochem . 225:289-295.
  50. Scott, D . R., D . Weeks, C . Hong, S . Postius, K . Melchers, and G . Sachs. 1998 . The role of internal urease in acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori . Gastroenterology 114:58-70.
  51. Slonczewski, J . L., B . P . Rosen, J . R . Alger, and R . M . Macnab. 1981 . pH homeostasis in Escherichia coli: measurements by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance of methylphosphonate and phosphate . Proc . Natl . Acad . Sci . USA 78:6271-6275.
  52. Small, P., D . Blankenhorn, D . Welty, E . Zinser, and J . L . Slonczewski. 1994 . Acid and base resistance in Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri: role of rpoS and growth pH . J . Bacteriol . 176:1729-1737.
  53. Smith, J . L. 2003 . The role of gastric acid in preventing foodborne disease and how bacteria overcome acid conditions . J . Food Prot . 66:1292-1303.
  54. Stingl, K., E . M . Uhlemann, R . Schmid, K . Altendorf, and E . P . Bakker. 2002 . Energetics of Helicobacter pylori and its implications for the mechanism of urease-dependent acid tolerance at pH 1 . J . Bacteriol . 184:3053-3060 .
  55. Sukhareva, B . S., A . S . Tikhonenko, and E . L . Darii. 1994 . Study of the quaternary structure of glutamate carboxylase from Escherichia coli . Mol . Biol . [Moscow] 28:1407-1411.
  56. Tanabe, M., K . Nishio, Y . Iko, Y . Sambongi, A . Iwamoto-Kihara, Y . Wada, and M . Futai. 2001 . Rotation of a complex of the {gamma} subunit and c ring of Escherichia coli ATP synthase: the rotor and stator are interchangeable . J . Biol . Chem . 276:15269-15274 .
  57. Thoma, W . J., J . G . Steiert, R . L . Crawford, and K . Ugurbil. 1986 . pH measurements by 31P NMR in bacterial suspensions using phenyl phosphonate as a probe . Biochem . Biophys . Res . Commun . 138:1106-1109.
  58. Vogel, H . J., and D . M . Bonner. 1956 . Acetylornithase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties . J . Biol . Chem . 218:97-106.
  59. Weeks, D . L., S . Eskandari, D . R . Scott, and G . Sachs. 2000 . A H+-gated urea channel: the link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization . Science 287:482-485 .
  60. Winkler, H . H., and T . H . Wilson. 1966 . The role of energy coupling in the transport of beta-galactosides by Escherichia coli . J . Biol . Chem . 241:2200-2211 .
  61. Zilberstein, D., V . Agmon, S . Schuldiner, and E . Padan. 1982 . The sodium/proton antiporter is part of the pH homeostasis mechanism in Escherichia coli . J . Biol . Chem . 257:3687-3691.

 

 

Free Online Full-text Article

 

What Is Salmonella?, What Is Genome?, What Is Staphylococcus Aureus?, What Is Growth Medium?, What Is Antibiotic?, n, Bacteria, a, Microbiology, s, Microorganisms, r, Microorganism, i, Bacterium, o, Microbial, e, S. cerevisiae, r, Acinetobacter, c, Escherichia coli, c, Microorganisms, e, Staphylococcus, r, Neisseria, o, Candida albicans, e, Microorganism, r, Escherichia coli, i, Vibriosis, r, Listeriosis, o, Leuconostoc, n, Klebsiella, e, Multidrug resistant, n, Escherichia coli, n, Antibiotics, a, Microbiological, e, Staphylococcus, r, S. cerevisiae, o, Antimicrobials




 

   Scientific Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C

Agricultural Microbiology
Anaerobic Microbiology
Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Artificial Atmosphere
Bioassay of Antibiotics
Biofilm Microbiology
Bioreactor Technology
Biotechnology
Cell Biology
Clinical Microbiology
Environmental Microbiology
Experiments with Yeast
Fermentation
Food Microbiology
Functional Genomics
Gene Technology
Growth Media Development
Growth Rate and Lag Time
Industrial Microbiology
Medical/Pharmaceutical Field
Microbiological Assay
Microbiological Research
Microbiology of Cosmetics

go to a specific theme...

Military Microbiology
Molecular Microbiology
Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity
Oral Microbiology
Patents
Postantibiotic Studies
Soil Microbiology
Spore Microbiology
Veterinary Microbiology
Waste/Wastewater Treatment
Water Microbiology
Wine Microbiology

 


 

© 2005 Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) | Privacy Statement | P.O. Box 1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland, phone: +358 9 85172920, fax: +358 9 8749481, e-mail: microbiology@bionewsonline.com
 

 

 

Last modified: May 25, 2005