|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p . 6158-6170, Vol . 185, No . 20
Interfering with Different Steps of Protein Synthesis Explored by Transcriptional Profiling of Escherichia coli K-12
|
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Escherichia
coli responses to four inhibitors that interfere with translation
were monitored at the transcriptional level . A DNA microarray method
provided a comprehensive view of changes in mRNA levels after exposure
to these agents . Real-time reverse transcriptase PCRanalysis served to verify observations made with microarrays, and a
chromosomal grpE::lux operon
fusion was employed to specifically monitor the heat shock response.
4-Azaleucine, a competitive inhibitor of leucyl-tRNA synthetase,
surprisingly triggered the heat shock response . Administration of
mupirocin, an inhibitor of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase activity, resulted
in changes reminiscent of the stringent response . Treatment with
kasugamycin and puromycin (targeting ribosomal subunit association as
well as its peptidyl-transferase activity) caused accumulation of mRNAs
from ribosomal protein operons . Abundant biosynthetic transcripts were
often significantly diminished after treatment with any of these
agents . Exposure of a relA strain to mupirocin resulted in
accumulation of ribosomal protein operon transcripts . However, the
relA strain's response to the other inhibitors was quite
similar to that of the wild-type
strain .
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Protein synthesis is a multistep process (Fig.
1) . Free amino acids are selected with high specificity byaminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and charged to tRNA . The resulting
aminoacyl-tRNAs are essential components in the initiation and
elongation steps of protein synthesis that take place on the ribosome.
In Escherichia coli these processes are integrated through the
stringent response (9).
When uncharged tRNA occupies the ribosomal A site, the alarmones ppGpp
and pppGpp accumulate due to the action of the relA gene
product, the stringent factor . These alarmones encourage transcription
of amino acid biosynthetic genes
(41) and discourage
initiation at the strong promoters that drive formation of the
translational apparatus
(3,
4) .
|
Over the years,
many herbicides and antibiotics have been developed that target these
processes (reviewed in references
11,
19, and
20) . Rhodius et
al . have recently reviewed evidence that DNA
microarray-mediated gene expression profiling sheds light on
the consequences of administration of inhibitors to E . coli
(35) . Cellular responses
to both the glutamine mimic acivicin
(39) and the DNA-damaging
agent mitomycin C (53)
have been investigated . Such success encouraged us to consider the
consequences of inhibiting protein biosynthesis at a variety of steps
(Fig . 1) .
Inhibitors exist that interfere with the synthesis of branched-chain amino acids and their utilization in translation . Sulfometuron methyl (SM), a slow tight-binding inhibitor of the branched-chain amino acid biosynthetic enzyme acetolactate synthase (21, 38), has been extensively studied from many perspectives . These include an E . coli gene expression-profiling study with a set of gene fusions (47) estimated to be about 30% complete (48) . SM administration results in starvation for the branched-chain amino acids and pantothenate as well as 2-ketoacid imbalances (22, 24, 25) . Moreover, the global transcriptional response to this inhibitor is characterized by a strong rpoS regulon (14) signature, as if SM triggers a premature conversion from exponential- to stationary-phase growth (47) .
Two inhibitors of branched-chain aminoacyl-tRNA formation have been studied in some detail . One, 4-azaleucine (AZL), is a competitive inhibitor of leucine binding to E . coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) that does not progress to the azaleucyl-adenylate in vitro (40) . AZL differs from leucine by having a tertiary, titratable N at the branch point of the R group (42) . E. coli mutations conferring resistance to AZL have been identified in a variety of genes, including genes encoding amino acid transport and LeuRS (19) . The second inhibitor, mupirocin (MUP), a mimic of isoleucyl-adenylate also known as pseudomonic acid (15), is utilized as a topical antibiotic . Resistance to MUP is caused by alterations in IleRS structure (7, 57) . Thus, it is expected that SM treatment causes a paucity of branched-chain amino acids and 2-ketoacid imbalance and that AZL treatment saturates LeuRS with an amino acid analog that cannot condense with ATP . In addition it is speculated that MUP binding to IleRS yields an enzyme with an activated amino acid analog incapable of being condensed with tRNA . That is, MUP treatment mimics what happens when a supply of uncharged tRNA is inaccessible .
Kasugamycin (KAS) inhibits initiation of polypeptide synthesis (32) . Resistance mutations map to several loci in E . coli that encode either structural components or modifying activities of the ribosome (19) . Thus, we expect that branched-chain and other aminoacyl-tRNAs accumulate upon KAS treatment since aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is unrestrained while the major route of aminoacyl-tRNA consumption is blocked . Puromycin (PRM) is an analog of aminoacyl-tRNA that binds to the acceptor site of the ribosome, blocking elongation and causing premature release of the growing polypeptide chain (11) . Thus, PRM elevates the titer of unfolded proteins in the cytoplasm, triggering the heat shock response (13) .
Here we investigate the action of AZL, MUP, KAS, and PRM through the use of DNA microarray-mediated gene expression profiling of stringent and relaxed derivatives of E . coli K-12 and compare this work to recent studies of antibiotic treatment of the pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (31) and of E . coli growth transitions (10) .
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Chemicals.
Kanamycin, PRM, and
4-aza-D,L-leucine were purchased from Sigma (St.
Louis, Mo.) . KAS was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, Calif.) . MUP
was a gift from Smith Kline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (West Sussex,
United Kingdom) .
Strains, growth
conditions, and materials.
The E . coli K-12 derivatives
(obtained from M . Cashel [National Institutes of Health])
used were CF1943 (W3110) and CF1944 (W3110
relA251::kan)
(56) . Strains used in
other microarray experiments were the near-wild-type strain MG1655
(2), the tolC
mutant DE 112 (49), and
the ilvB mutant DPD1675
(47) . Prototrophic E.
coli strain DPD3084 harbors a
grpE::luxCDABE fusion at the
chromosomal lac locus
(51) .
Aerobic growth was carried out at 37°C in M9 minimal medium (28) supplemented with 0.4% glucose and treated with shaking (250 rpm) unless otherwise specified . The concentration of each inhibitor of translation used to treat cultures prior to RNA isolation was determined by dilution of overnight cultures into fresh M9 glucose medium . At an A600 of 0.2, individual cultures were split before treatment with various concentrations of each inhibitor and growth was monitored for 4 h after the inhibitor addition .
Range finding determined that the concentration of each of the inhibitors AZL, MUP, KAS, and PRM needed to decrease the growth rate (increase the doubling time) by a factor of 5 for the relA+ strain CF1943 was 750, 8.5, 750, and 818 µg/ml, respectively, while a concentration of each inhibitor of only 375, 4.3, 750, and 546 µg/ml, respectively, was needed to retard growth of the isogenic relA strain CF1944 to the same extent . These inhibitor concentrations were later used to determine gene expression changes after a chronic, 30-min administration of the antibacterial agents .
RNA isolation. Total RNA used in microarray procedures and real-time PCR measurements was extracted (following established methods) from cultures . Overnight cultures of each strain were diluted into fresh M9 glucose medium and incubated at 37°C . Once the cultures had reached an A600 of 0.4, they were split into two portions . One portion was treated with the inhibitor at the previously determined concentration, while the other was left unchallenged . The cells were pelleted after 30 min of shaking at 37°C, and the total RNA was immediately extracted using RNeasy minicolumns (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.) as previously described (54) .
DNA microarray experiments. The procedures used to generate fluorescently labeled cDNA for microarray experiments, as well as those used in hybridization, data acquisition, and analysis, have been extensively described (55) and reviewed (34) previously . A total of 4,290 distinct open reading frames (ORFs) were spotted in duplicate on each glass slide (55) .
Measurement
of relative transcript levels using real-time PCR.
Bulk RNA isolated as described above
was used as a template for cDNA production using random primers
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and Superscript II
RNaseH- reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) . These
cDNA samples were diluted 20-fold and used as the template for
real-time PCRs . Primer pairs specific to several genes of interest
(Table
1) were designed using software on the Primer3 website
(http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi)
(36) . The PCR was carried
out using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen), and the
thermal cycling and real-time monitoring of SYBR green fluorescence
were performed on an iCycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) according to
the protocol supplied with the master mix . Data were collected in
duplicate (using cDNA prepared from two independently isolated bulk RNA
samples) for each gene in each data set . The severalfold changes in
expression levels were calculated using a
Ct method described
elsewhere
(54) .
|
Confirmation
of rel phenotypes.
Upon amino acid starvation, stringent
(relA+) strains greatly reduce
incorporation of precursor into RNA while the bulk incorporation of UTP
into macromolecules proceeds at an unaffected pace in a relaxed
(relA) strain
(9) . The rel
phenotype of each strain tested was determined by monitoring the
incorporation of [14C]uracil into macromolecules
during isoleucine starvation induced by addition of L-valine
to the culture medium
(27) . Overnight cultures
were diluted into M9 glucose medium and incubated at 30°C . Upon
reaching an A600 of 0.4, the culture was split into
two portions and [14C]uracil (0.55 mCi/mmol) was
added to achieve a final concentration of 20 µg/ml.
L-valine was added to 0.2 mg/ml to one sample, while the
other remained untreated . At various times before and after the
addition of valine, 0.5 ml was taken from each culture and added to 2.5
ml of cold 6% trichloroacetic acid . Samples were incubated on
ice for 20 min before being collected on Whatman GF/A filters . Each
sample was washed three times with 5% trichloroacetic acid and
twice with 70% ethanol and allowed to dry . The extent of
incorporation of [14C]uracil into macromolecules
was measured by scintillation
counting .
Bioluminescence of grpE::lux operon fusion. A 10-ml culture of strain DPD3084 was incubated with shaking (250 rpm) in a 50-ml Erlenmeyer flask at 37°C in minimal medium E (12) supplemented with 0.4% glucose and thiamine until early exponential-phase growth was achieved . At that point, 50-µl samples of the culture were exposed in microtiter plates to twofold dilution series with inhibitors in the same medium (49). Light production was monitored as a function of time as described previously (49), with updated instrumentation (Labsystems Lunminoskan Ascent) . The response ratio and maximal-response ratio for such a time course study have been defined previously (5); the minimal-response ratio is the smallest fraction of light emitted by a treated culture relative to that emitted by an untreated control over the duration of an experiment . Experiments were performed at 37°C because the gene products of the luxCDABE operon utilized (47) (derived from Photorhabdus luminescens [50]) are thermotolerant .
| RESULTS |
|---|
Expression
profile of wild-type E . coli.
Preliminary characterization determined
the inhibitor concentrations used to treat each E . coli strain
(see Materials and Methods) . The stringent and relaxed phenotypes of
the wild-type (CF1943) and relA (CF1944) strains were verified
by monitoring the bulk incorporation of uracil into RNA (data not
shown) . E . coli strain CF1943 was then treated with each of
the four protein synthesis inhibitors at the concentrations specified
above .
AZL. Expression profiling of transcripts corresponding to the 4,290 E . coli ORFs indicated that the response to AZL was quite broad . Expression of 134 genes was elevated >2-fold, while expression of 33 genes was elevated >4-fold and transcript levels of 16 ORFs were elevated >8-fold in response to the challenge . Examination of the 58 genes encoding transcripts whose levels were elevated >3-fold was revealing (Table 2 and supplementary material [Table 1A; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]). Of the 58 genes, 12 were heat shock genes (dnaK, dnaJ, htrA, htpG, htpX, clpB, grpE, ibpA, hslU, hslV, mopB, and mopA), another 4 were genes induced by other stresses (suhB, mazE, soxS, and nrdG), and 12 specified proteins of uncharacterized function . Elevated expression of a limited subset of amino acid biosynthesis genes was noted; it was striking that of the 11 genes in this class whose expression was elevated, 9 were arg and 2 were met . Similarly, unanticipated elevation of arg and met transcripts has been noted in a microarray study of the E . coli response to the histidine biosynthesis inhibitor acivicin (39) .
|
Down-regulation
was also observed . Of the 34 genes whose transcripts were decreased
>4-fold (Table
3 and supplementary material [Table
2A; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]),
functions cannot yet be assigned to 22 . Similarities among members of
this group of down-regulated genes were not
discerned .
|
MUP.
The response to MUP was quite different
from that caused by AZL (for up-regulation, see Table
2 and supplementary
material [Table 1B; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/];
for down-regulation, see Table
3 and supplementary
material [Table
2B; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]).
Only 20 mRNA levels were modestly elevated (between 2.5-
and 7.5-fold), and 10 of the corresponding genes have no
assigned function . It was comforting that ilv,
leu, and thr transcription was elevated by MUP
treatment, since the ilvGMEDA, thr, and
leu operons are thought to be responsive to isoleucyl-tRNA
limitation due to the presence of isoleucine codons in each
operon's attenuation leader genes
(18,
33,
45) .
Transcription reduced by MUP treatment was mostly associated with known genes; only 7 of the 64 genes with reduced expression had an unassigned role. Moreover, many of these genes were previously noted to be among the 50 most abundantly expressed ORFs when E . coli was cultured in minimal medium to either the exponential (22 of the 64 genes) or transitional (21 of the 64) phase of a typical growth curve (55) . Of the 64 genes displaying reduced transcript abundance, 27 were in the list of 73 genes most highly expressed during the exponential or transition phase of growth in minimal medium . Moreover, 33 of these 64 genes showed at least twofold-reduced expression levels after challenge with acivicin, a glutamine analog (39) .
KAS. Compared to interference with tRNA aminoacylation, inhibition of translation initiation led to accumulation of more than 200 transcripts (Table 2 and supplementary material [Table 1C; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]). Among those were mRNAs derived from ribosomal protein genes organized into operons and loci encoding transporters for diverse polyvalent molecules such as citrate, taurine, and carnitine . Many of the 150 down-regulated genes (Table 3 and supplementary material [Table 2C; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]) were also familiar . Among them were genes (previously identified to be highly expressed when cells are grown in minimal medium [55]) specifying the glyoxylate bypass (aceABK), glycolysis (ptsHI, pgi, pgk, fba, tpiA, eno, and gapA), the pentose shunt (talA and tktB), the TCA cycle (gltA and icdA), and other central carbon pathways (zwf, pflB, and adhE) as well as biosynthesis (aroF, cysK, folE, ilvC, and metE) . Levels of transcripts normally associated with growth cessation either through membership in the rpoS regulon (cbpA, dps, hdeA, hdeB, osmY, otsA, otsB, poxB, wrbA, and yeaG) (14) or by empirical study (rmf, gadA, and gadB) (55) were counterintuitively found not to be elevated after the KAS challenge. Taking these data together, it appears that E . coli was responding to KAS by attempting to preserve or even enhance its protein biosynthetic capacity while jettisoning its ability to produce energy .
PRM. The expression of 119 genes was enhanced by treatment with the inhibitor PRM (Table 2 and supplementary material [Table 1D; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]), including that of 34 genes that encode ribosomal proteins as well as that of 6 translation-related genes embedded in ribosomal protein operons (infB, nusA, prlA, rimM [yfjA], rnpA, and trmD) (16). Transcript levels of 383 genes were found to be decreased after this challenge (Table 3 and supplementary material [Table 2D; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]). As with KAS treatment, exposure to PRM decreased expression of a subset of the rpoS regulon (14) and stationary-phase stimulon (55) genes such as gadAB, hdeABD, osmEY, otsAB, treAR, wrbA, and xasA as well as genes involved in a much broader array of energy metabolism functions, ranging from glycolysis and associated functions (dld, eno, gapA, gapC, pgi, pgk, and ptsHI), the TCA cycle (gltA, icdA, sdhBC, sucACD, and aceA), and the pentose shunt (talA and tktB) to respiration (cydA, cyoD, fdhE, fdnI, hyfGHI, narVW, nikBDE, nrdEFHI, and pflB). Normally highly expressed genes (55), including aroF, folE, ilvC, metE, and livJK, were subjected to an apparent down-regulation. Transcripts of genes of biosynthetic pathways (aroAG, asd, glnBEGL, gltD, guaC, hisBDFIL, leuB, lysC, serAC, thrAC, trpABC, and tyrB), catabolism of alternative carbon sources (ebgAC, gatYZ, tauABCD, malGKM, and manXYZ), and iron metabolism (cirA, entABC, fecBR, and fhuBF) also accumulated to a substantially lower level .
Differential responses of a relA mutant to the four inhibitors. The absence of an intact RelA protein in the cell interfered with its ability to mount an effective response to a limited supply of amino acid . Differences in the transcriptional patterns in the presence and absence of the relA gene product, possibly revealing response elements under stringent control, are highlighted below .
AZL. Transcription of about 9% of E . coli genes (381 genes) increased >2.5-fold after AZL treatment of the relA mutant (Table 4 and supplementary material [Table 3A; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]); for 41 of the genes, transcription was induced >8-fold . Of this subset of 41 genes, 22 encoded products of unknown function, 3 specified amino acid biosynthetic genes (argA, argG, and metA), and nine (clpB, dnaK, grpE, htpG, htpX, htrA, ibpA, ibpB, and mopA) were involved in the heat shock response to unfolded cytoplasmic proteins (58) . Moreover, this group included 12 ribosomal protein genes (16) .
|
However,
levels of transcripts of 61 ORFs decreased after AZL treatment (Table
5 and supplementary material [Table
4A; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]).
Among those were many biosynthetic genes, including several
(aroF, folE, ilvC, and metE) that
are known to be quite highly expressed during normal exponential growth
in minimal medium . Levels of transcripts of genes known to accumulate
during acidification (1)
and entry into stationary phase
(55) (dps,
gadA, gadB, hdeA, hdeB,
osmC, osmY, wrbA, xasA, and
yeaG) were also found to be
lowered .
|
MUP.
The relA mutant's
response to the MUP inhibitor was quite different from that observed
for the parental strain . Transcripts of 105 genes attained moderately
(between 2.5- and 10-fold) elevated levels (Table
4 and supplementary
material [Table 3B; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]).
One-third of the elevated transcripts emanated from ribosomal protein
operons (16) . Thus, the
relA mutation was responsible for an apparent inversion in the
expression of ribosomal protein gene transcripts; these mRNAs
accumulated after MUP treatment of the relA strain, while they
did not do so after inhibition of the parental
strain .
Transcripts of 94 ORFs were down-regulated >2.5-fold by MUP treatment of the relA strain, while the expression levels of 43 were decreased >4-fold (Table 5 and supplementary material [Table 4B; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]). Included in this more stringent subset were nine genes (aceA, aceB, aceK, eno, gapA, gltA, icdA, pflB, and ptsI) of central carbon metabolism and two genes (cycA and cyoB) of respiration as well as many amino acid biosynthetic genes . Four genes (aroF, cysK, ilvC, and metE) classified as amino acid biosynthetic geneshave been previously noted to be highly expressed (55), while eight others (aroF, pheA, trpA, trpB, trpC, trpD, trpE, and tyrA) belong to the family of genes specifying synthesis of the aromatic amino acids . Thus, the patterns of reduced transcript accumulation were similar for the relA and relA+ pair challenged with MUP; the striking though expected difference (9) was that expression of the genes specifying the translational machinery did not cease in the relA mutant .
KAS. Challenge with the KAS inhibitor resulted in at least a 2.5-fold-increased abundance of transcripts corresponding to 339 ORFs in the relA strain (Table 4 and supplementary material [Table 3C; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]), echoing the broad impact of this inhibitor upon the relA+ strain reported above . Of these genes, 32 specify ribosomal proteins (16) . Further inspection revealed that 10 of the 63 ORFs (overexpressed >7-fold) encoded ribosomal proteins . This challenge also reduced transcript levels for 120 ORFs (Table 5 and supplementary material [Table 4C; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]), including genes involved in stress responses (mopA, mopB, hdeB, gadA, gadB, and otsB) (43), biosynthetic genes (both those previously noted to be highly expressed [aroF, cysK, folE, glnA, and ilvC, and metE] [55] and those that do not appear to be extraordinary [aroB, aroG, cysA, cysN, ilvE, ilvG, ilvI, lysC, serA, thrB, thrC, trpA, trpB, trpC, trpD, and trpE]), and genes of central carbon metabolism (aceA, fba, gapA, gltA, icdA, pgk, ppc, ptsI, sucA, and tpiA) .
PRM. Transcripts of 259 ORFs accumulated in the relA strain after PRM administration (Table 4 and supplementary material [Table 3D; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]). The pattern seen was reminiscent of that observed with the parental strain . The accumulated transcripts were produced from 45 genes specifying ribosomal proteins and 17 genes (cmk, dnaA, dnaG, dnaN, himD, infB, insA_1, insB_1, mviM, nusA, priB, prlA, rnpA, rpoA, rpoD, trmD, and tsf) that were adjacent to ribosomal protein-specifying genes (16) . Down-regulated transcripts fell into the same general classes seen with the parental strain; transcripts from genes involved in energy metabolism (aceA, aceK, adhP, atpA, atpD, atpG, eno, fba, gapA, pflB, pgk, ppc, ptsI, sdhB, sucA, sucB, and sucC), iron metabolism (entB, entE and fur), stress responses (cadA, gadA, gadB, and hdeA) (43), and biosynthesis (aroF, aroG, ilvC, leuA, leuB, lysC, metE, serA, thrB, thrC, trpA, and trpB) and highly expressed genes (aroF, ilvC, and metE) (55) were less abundant in the mutant after PRM incubation (Table 5 and supplementary material [Table 4D; http://trna.chem.yale.edu/supdata/sup001/]) .
Independent measurements of inhibitor effects. Microarray data can reveal an organism's transcriptional response to stimuli on a genomic scale. However, to reinforce this system-wide profile, two alternative measures of monitoring a gene's transcription were used: real-time PCR and assays of an E . coli strain harboring the lux operon fused to the grpE promoter .
Real-time PCR. Verification of the major trends suggested by the microarray data was sought, using real-time PCR to measure relative changes in the abundance of selected transcripts (Table 6) between different RNA preparations . The direction of change, or lack thereof, observed with this technique generally confirmed results obtained by global profiling with microarrays, although variations in magnitude between the two technologies were observed (see results for aroF in Table 6). Overall, there was more than 80% concordance of the data generated by the microarray with that generated by the real-time PCR procedure with regard to the direction of the expression level change. Transcripts of genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis and uptake, a major functional group involved in the cell's responses to all inhibitors tested, showed consistent agreement between the trends suggested by both techniques (see results for argA, argB, aroF, ilvC, livJ, and trpC in Fig. 2) . Also, the data from genes tested, which are involved in the cell's response to stresses and entry into stationary phase, exhibited firm agreement (see results for dnaK, mopA, soxS, and wrbA in Fig. 2) . Disagreement was apparent between the microarray and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) data for two genes involved in sugar metabolism (lacZ and sfsA) and the gene coding for ribosomal protein S12 (rpsL) . While the reasons for the discrepancies between the two data sets for these three genes are not clear, the overall trends suggested by the real-time PCR data for the set of genes shown in Table 6 were in good agreement with expression changes inferred from the genome-wide data set (see above) .
|
|
Bioluminescence of the
grpE::lux operon fusion
strain.
The heat shock
response (58) is thought
to be triggered by the presence of unfolded proteins in the cytoplasm
(23) . To determine
whether such a response can be triggered by the translation inhibitors
studied here, we used E . coli strain DPD3084, harboring the
rpoH-controlled grpE promoter fused to the
lux operon . As seen in Fig.
3, the expected result (that exposure to high concentrations of ethanol
elevated expression from this fusion) was revealed by bioluminescent
monitoring . At moderate concentrations (16 to 250 µg/ml), AZL
treatment elevated grpE::luxCDABE
expression . At higher concentrations (data not shown), light emission
was lowered by this treatment, presumably because protein synthesis
needed to make Lux polypeptides was blocked . Concentrations lower than
16 µg/ml had no effect on light output . MUP concentrations of
more than 0.4 µg/ml compromised light emission, while the
strain was unresponsive to lower concentrations . Treatment with KAS
lowered bioluminescence at concentrations higher than 63 µg/ml.
A robust bioluminescent response indicative of heat shock was observed
at 2 to 31 µg/ml of the antibiotic, amounts well below that
needed for growth inhibition, while lower doses were ineffectual . The
response to PRM was more complicated . Reduced light emission was seen
over a wide range of concentrations (from 8 to 250 µg/ml); at
lower concentrations, DPD3084 appeared indifferent to the challenge.
During the time course studied, increased heat shock expression was
seen in a narrow window of PRM concentrations of 63 to 125
µg/ml (consistent with a previously reported modest response to
a related grpE::lux fusion at 200
µg/ml
[52]) .
|
Characterization
of abundant biosynthetic transcripts often lost after inhibitor
challenge.
Several such
transcripts were lost after inhibitor challenges (Table
3 and Table
5)
(39) . To examine this
phenomenon more thoroughly, cysK, glnA,
ilvC, and metE transcripts were studied .
RT-PCR was used to measure the chemical half-lives of several transcripts in an early-exponential-phase culture (A600 = 0.4) of E . coli strain MG1655 subjected to shaking at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium after blocking of transcription initiation with rifampin (0.15 mg/ml) (Fig. 4) . As controls, the long-lived ompA transcript and the labile trxA mRNA (17) were also examined . The half-life of the trxA mRNA was found to be 1.9 min, while that of the ompA transcript was 8.8 min. Those for cysK, glnA, ilvC, and metE were determined to be 1.8, 0.5, 1.4, and 2.3 min, respectively . Thus, the chemical half-lives of these transcripts were not remarkable .
|
The loss of ilvC, glnA, and
metE mRNAs after different inhibitor challenges was determined
by microarray analyses (see Table
7 for details) . RT-PCR analysis of the same mRNA preparations confirmed
the observations . Treatment with SM, 2,4-dinitrophenol,
p-hydroxybenzoate, and acivicin was shown by both
methodologies to cause substantial loss of these mRNAs
consistent with the RT-PCR studies of inhibitors arresting translation
(Table
6) .
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
RNA
polymerase activity is limiting in E . coli . The 4,641
predicted promoters responsible for expression of the 2,326
transcription units (37)
are serviced by approximately 2,800 molecules of RNA polymerase in a
cell that doubles once every hour, a rate typical of growth using
glucose as a carbon source in minimal medium (the standard, uninhibited
conditions used in this study) . Of these enzymes, only 500 are actively
engaged in transcription at any instant, with 300 producing mRNA and
200 synthesizing tRNA and rRNA
(8) . Even when E.
coli is growing at its maximal rate, only about 700 RNA polymerase
molecules are engaged in the production of mRNA at any one time, with
2,600 RNA polymerase molecules devoted to stable RNA
synthesis .
We have previously used a parts-per-million scale (55) to estimate mRNA content in E . coli. Under standard conditions, at any instant >300 RNA polymerase molecules are engaged in mRNA synthesis, with a transit time of 21 s (8) for an average 951-bp gene (6) . Thus, transcription across some ORF occurs about 55,000 times per generation. This is equivalent to between 10 and 15 transcription events per generation for a gene whose expression is average (223 ppm [0.0223%]) . Deviations from this value are large; many ORFs may be transcribed less than once per cell division (18 ppm) while others are estimated to be transcribed about 900 times per doubling (16,200 ppm) (55) . This range is consistent with other thoughts on gene expression, including that the range of protein expression is from <1 to 105 molecules per cell (29, 46) .
These experiments provide an approximation of the distribution of RNA polymerase among those promoters that produce mRNA . It is conceivable, however, that distribution of RNA polymerase between mRNA and stable RNA synthesis can change greatly upon inhibition (3, 4); that would have caused us to underestimate induction of gene expression in response to some inhibitors .
The broad effects of each inhibitor on gene expression levels are evident when the distribution of induced and repressed genes over the spectrum of functional classifications in the cell is examined . Major trends and large effects become easily discernible using this approach . One can immediately see that the total number of gene transcripts affected varies greatly with the inhibitor used (for an example, see the results of MUP inhibition of the wild-type relA strain versus those of KAS inhibition of the wild-type relA strain [Fig. 5]) . This property of the response may illustrate the inherent differential complexity of the inhibitors' targets . In the case of MUP, the primary effect is that of blocking one amino acid's incorporation into protein (i.e., MUP inhibits Ile charging onto tRNAIle) . KAS, on the other hand, targets a process involving a higher order of complexity, interfering with the central machinery of protein synthesis itself (i.e., KAS blocks formation of the 70S ribosomal particle) . The relA-dependent inversion of the expression of ribosomal proteins and those associated with the translation apparatus is easily recognizable for MUP treatment as discussed above (Fig. 5) . Another striking feature of the various expression patterns is that a large fraction of the cell's response to each inhibitor is derived from hypothetical or unknown ORFs (Fig. 5) . It is therefore clear that a large part of any inhibitor's effects on cellular physiology cannot yet be rationalized .
|
The four inhibitors
elicited different patterns of elevated gene expression from the
relA+ strain . AZL caused elevated
expression of many stress-induced genes (including those of the heat
shock regulon) as well as increased content of amino acid, though not
branched-chain amino acid, biosynthetic transcripts . The thought that
AZL is not charged to tRNA and incorporated into protein within E.
coli (40) needs to
be reconsidered in light of these results and those found with
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium
(42) and E . coli
(26) . Those mRNAs
elevated after MUP treatment were quite different, and the increased
amount of thr, leu, and ilv operon mRNAs
detected conformed to expectations consistent with deattenuation caused
by a limitation for isoleucyl-tRNA
(18,
45) . That the responses
to these two inhibitors differed from those caused by treatment with
agents acting on ribosomes was not surprising . Blocking initiation of
translation with KAS and causing premature release of polypeptides with
PRM resulted in elevated expression of ribosomal protein and other
mRNAs specifying the translational machinery, as if the cell sensed
that there was insufficient protein synthesis relative to other
cellular activities . Surprisingly, PRM treatment did not cause an
elevated heat shock response .
Shared patterns of reduced gene expression after inhibition of the relA+ strain were also observed . MUP, KAS, and PRM treatment elicited reduced accumulation of transcripts previously identified as being highly expressed in exponentially growing cells or cells transitioning to the stationary phase (55) . In addition, KAS and PRM, but not AZL or MUP, treatment resulted in diminished titers of transcripts specifying several enzymes involved in central carbon metabolism . MUP treatment resulted in a decrease in mRNAs specifying ribosomal proteins, as would be expected for the stringent response (9) .
The relA mutation changed the observed pattern of gene expression in several ways . Most notably, each of the four treatments of a relA mutant resulted in elevated levels of ribosomal protein mRNAs; AZL and MUP did not cause elevated titers in the relA+ strain . These observations reinforce the concept of RelA acting as a "brake" to subvert the inclination to increase the titer of the translational machinery when protein synthesis is limited . Such a hypothesis could not be reached without comparisons of the various responses of a mutant strain challenged with a series of inhibitors blocking various points in the process of translation (Fig. 1) . While a more restricted set of translational inhibitors has been used to generate transcriptional profiles with another species (31), a broader set of chemicals, a global regulatory mutant, and prior quantitative knowledge of steady-state mRNA levels (55) have contributed to the concept suggested here .
The stringent response is complicated and has been operationally linked to relA function . Others have presented an expanded stringent response model (10) and have linked ppGpp, lrp, and rpoS to adaptation to famine (44) . Proper utilization of terminology and concepts surrounding the words stimulon, regulon, and modulon (30) may reveal considerable commonality among those results, the work reported in this article, and the results of studies presented elsewhere (39, 55) . Such convergence suggests that systems biology will contribute a great deal to the understanding of microbial physiology .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank
Jordan S . Pober (Yale University) for use of real-time PCR
equipment .
Research in the laboratory of D.G.S . was supported by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the Department of Energy, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration .
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding
author . Mailing address: Central Research and Development, Biochemical
Science and Engineering Experimental Station, P.O . Box 80173,
Wilmington, DE 19880-0173 . Phone: (302) 695-9264 . Fax: (302)
695-9183 . E-mail:
Robert.A.LaRossa{at}usa.dupont.com .
This
work is dedicated to the memory of Professor Philip E.
Hartman, Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins
University .
| REFERENCES |
|---|
What Is Genome?,
What Is Listeria Monocytogenes?,
What Is Genetics?,
What Is Yeast?,
What Is MIC?,
s,
Bacteriology,
e,
Microbe,
s,
Microbes,
e,
Bacterium,
o,
Microorganism,
o,
Antibiotics,
a,
Yeasts,
r,
Streptomycin,
i,
S. cerevisiae,
c,
Biofilters,
c,
Streptococci,
a,
Thermophile,
c,
Streptococcal,
n,
Thermophiles,
r,
Prokaryotes,
e,
Escherichia coli,
a,
Escherichia coli,
i,
Microbial,
c,
Bacillus anthracis,
s,
Escherichia coli,
c,
Lactobacillus,
r,
Streptococcal,
s,
Streptococcal,
e,
S. cerevisiae,
a,
Microorganisms,
o,
Bacillus subtilis
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||