|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p . 5936-5942, Vol . 185, No . 20 Cloning and Characterization of Archaeal Type I Signal Peptidase from Methanococcus voltaeSandy Y . M . Ng and Ken F . Jarrell* Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 Received 3 June 2003/ Accepted 31 July 2003
To date, the archaeal type I signal peptidase is still poorly characterized . Limited information has come from genome analysis and sequence annotation, which seems to suggest several similarities between the archaeal signal peptidase and its eukaryal counterpart (13) . Bacterial signal peptidase I is active as a monomer and is composed of two structural components referred to as domain I and domain II (20) . Within domain I, serine 90 and lysine 145 are the two critical amino acids identified; they are believed to form the catalytic dyad responsible for enzymatic activity and are conserved among bacteria . Domain II folds as a ß-sheet, and while it is found in all bacterial type I signal peptidases, its role in the enzymatic activity remains unclear . Unlike those in bacteria, eukaryotic signal peptidases do not contain domain II regions . Also, unlike their bacterial counterparts, eukaryotic signal peptidases function as part of a multisubunit signal peptidase complex, which in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is composed of the Sec11, Spc1, Spc2, and Spc3 proteins (31) . In terms of the catalytic dyad, serine 90 remains conserved while lysine 145 found in bacteria is replaced by a conserved histidine residue in eukaryotes (13) . Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved and nonconserved lysine residues present in Sec11 as well as in Spc3 do not hinder enzymatic activity, suggesting that eukaryal signal peptidases possess a very different catalytic mechanism (30) . Archaeal signal peptidases appear to resemble those in eukarya in terms of catalysis . Like those in eukarya, archaeal signal peptidases lack the conserved lysine of the bacterial serine/lysine catalytic dyad; it is replaced by a histidine residue . Also, most archaeal signal peptidases lack a significant domain II region, and even in the species that do possess domain II regions, these regions appear to be quite different from those identified in bacteria (13) . Thus far the only signal peptidase in archaea for which there are biochemical data is the preflagellin peptidase in methanococci encoded by flaK, which is responsible for the removal of the short atypical signal peptide found on archaeal flagellins (3, 7) . In other archaea, a limited number of other substrates, often sugar-binding proteins, are also processed by the same enzyme (2) . While putative type I signal peptidase genes have been identified in annotated complete sequenced genomes for many archaea, no biochemical data for any archaea have yet been presented to confirm that the annotated gene possesses signal peptidase activity . Recent studies of complete genomes of various archaea have identified between 8 and 32% of the proteomes predicted to be exported or secreted (22, 24), the majority of which would be expected to have signal peptides processed by the type I signal peptidase . Clearly the lack of data on type I signal peptidase in archaea represents a serious deficiency in our knowledge of protein secretion in the domain Archaea . In this paper, we report the cloning and overexpression of the type I signal peptidase of Methanococcus voltae in Escherichia coli as a His-tagged protein . Signal peptidase activity of this enzyme against the M . voltae S-layer protein as the substrate was demonstrated in vitro by employing a high-salt-concentration buffer to inhibit background E . coli enzymatic activity . This is the first report to demonstrate expressed type I signal peptidase activity from a specific archaeal gene product . (Portions of this work have been presented previously [S . L . Bardy, S . Y . Ng, L . Noad, and K . F . Jarrell, Abstr . 102nd Gen . Meet . Am . Soc . Microbiol., abstr . I-26, 2002].)
Cloning of the truncated S-layer gene. Although the signal peptide of the S-layer protein was originally predicted to be 12 amino acids in length (10) (S-layer protein initially reported as an ATPase [GenBank accession no . M59200]), new evidence has suggested that the translation start codon lies further upstream (1), extending the signal peptide to 28 amino acids in length . The cloning in this study was done based on this information . Due to the size of the natural S-layer protein (75 kDa) in M . voltae (16), it was reasoned that the processed and unprocessed forms would be difficult to discern by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting . Therefore, a truncated version of the S-layer protein was produced for use in the peptidase assay . Primers were designed with NdeI and XhoI restriction sites (boldface type) incorporated into the forward (5'-GGAATTCCATATGGCAATGAGCTTAAAAAAAATCGGTGC -3') and reverse (5'-CCGCTCGAGTTGGAAGTCTTCGTTATCGTCATCG-3') primers, respectively . The amplified fragment, when expressed with the His tag, would generate a predicted protein of approximately 24.1 kDa, a size that has been proven to be effective for analyzing preflagellin cleavage (5) . PCR was performed on a MiniCycler (MJ Research, Inc., Waltham, Mass.) using Pwo DNA polymerase under the following conditions: 95°C for 5 min; 29 cycles of 94°C for 45 s; 50°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final cycle with an extension time of 5 min at 72°C . The amplified product was purified using a PCR purification column (Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.) and cloned into the multiple cloning site of the pET23a(+) vector via the NdeI and XhoI restriction sites to produce plasmid pKJ341 . In the PCR product, there is no stop codon, and when cloned into pET23a, an in-frame fusion with a His-tag sequence at the C terminal of the protein was created, allowing for its subsequent detection by immunoblotting using anti-His antibodies .
Cloning of the M . voltae signal peptidase gene.
A signal peptidase gene (MJ0260) was identified in the complete genomic sequence of Methanococcus jannaschii (6) . From this, forward (5'-GGAATTCCATATGGTTGTTTTGTTTTTAATTTGG-3') and reverse (5'-GGAATTCCATATGTTATTTTCTCCCTCCTTTAAGATAATTG-3') PCR primers were used to amplify, from M . jannaschii genomic DNA, a 609-bp fragment which was subsequently used to generate a digoxigenin-labeled probe by using a DNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) . A 2.3-kb HindIII fragment that bound this probe was identified in a Southern blot with M . voltae genomic DNA . To clone the corresponding gene, M . voltae genomic DNA was digested with HindIII and the fragments in the size range of 2 to 2.5 kb were excised, purified, and ligated into pUC21, followed by transformation into E . coli (DH5 Based on the sequence of this clone, primers were designed with NdeI and XhoI restriction sites (boldface type) incorporated into the forward (5'-GGAATTCCATATGGATAATAAAGATAATAATC-3') and reverse (5'-CCGCTCGAGTTTACTAAACATTTTAAATATGC-3') primers, respectively . PCR was performed as described above, and the entire amplified M . voltae signal peptidase gene product was cloned into pET23a to generate an in-frame fusion with the C-terminal His-tag sequences, generating plasmid pKJ385 . Isolation of M . voltae membranes. Six milliliters of late-exponential-phase M . voltae cells was harvested by aerobic centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 5 min . The pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of medium and diluted with sterile distilled H20 to a final volume of 1.5 ml, resulting in lysis of the osmotically fragile cells . The lysate was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 10 min to pellet the membranes, which were resuspended in 100 µl of distilled H20 for use in the peptidase assay . Overexpression and isolation of the truncated S-layer protein and signal peptidase. E . coli BL21(DE3) harboring pSJS1240 was used as the expression host for the plasmid pKJ341 (truncated S-layer protein gene cloned into pET23a) . Protein expression was induced in log-phase cells with the addition of IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) (Life Technologies, Gibco-BRL, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) to a concentration of 0.4 mM . At 20-min postinduction, when the unprocessed S-layer protein was the dominant expressed form, the cells were heat treated at 80°C for 30 min to inactivate the E . coli signal peptidase I . Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 10 min, and the pellet was kept frozen overnight . The pellet was resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and the viscous solution was sonicated twice for 30 s each time on ice to aid cell lysis . Unbroken cells and potential inclusion bodies were removed by centrifugation at 5,000 x g for 5 min . A crude membrane fraction containing the S-layer protein was then obtained by centrifugation of the supernatant at 20,000 x g for 30 min . The pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of buffer (5 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.75 M urea [pH 7.9]) and dialyzed against sterile distilled H2O overnight at 4°C . This material was used in subsequent peptidase assays as a substrate source . Membranes containing overexpressed M . voltae signal peptidase were obtained from E . coli cells harboring pKJ385 in a similar fashion except that the expression host was E . coli BL21(DE3)/pLysS, the induction time was 90 min, and the cells were not heat treated prior to membrane isolation . Signal peptidase assay using S-layer protein as the substrate. The assay for S-layer signal peptidase activity in M . voltae was based on the conditions determined as being optimal for in vitro activity of the preflagellin peptidase from M . voltae (7), which in turn had been based on the assay for prepilin peptidase developed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25) . The substrate for the assay was the E . coli membrane preparation containing the overexpressed S-layer protein, isolated as described above . The enzyme source was an M . voltae membrane preparation . The assay was performed with 72 µl of E . coli membranes containing the overexpressed S-layer protein (approximately 40 µg) and 12 µl of M . voltae membranes (approximately 30 µg of protein) in the presence of 12 µl of buffer A (125 mM HEPES [pH 8.5], with 1.25% Triton X-100), 12 µl of buffer B (125 mM HEPES, 4 M KCl [pH 8.5], with 1.25% Triton X-100), and 12 µl of sterile distilled H2O . The reaction was started by the addition of M . voltae membranes, and the reaction mixture was kept at 37°C in a water bath . Samples (10-µl aliquots) were taken from the reaction mixture at various time points, mixed into 2x ESB (0.0625 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 1% [wt/vol] SDS, 10% glycerol, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.001% bromophenol blue), and immediately boiled for 5 min prior to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using anti-His antibodies (26) . The peptidase assay using the cloned M . voltae signal peptidase was performed in a similar manner, with 12 µl of E . coli membrane preparation containing the M . voltae signal peptidase (approximately 40 and 0.4 µg of protein, respectively, for the high- and low-enzyme-concentration reactions) substituting as the enzyme source . The cation concentrations of the peptidase assay were varied by using different amounts of buffer A, buffer B, and buffer C (125 mM HEPES, 5 M NaCl [pH 8.5], with 1.25% Triton X-100) . N-terminal sequence analysis. The purified S-layer proteins (processed and unprocessed forms) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto an Immobilon-P nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) as previously described (28) . The membrane was briefly stained with Coomassie blue R250 (0.1% Coomassie blue R250, 40% methanol, 1% acetic acid), destained in 50% methanol, and rinsed thoroughly in distilled water . Protein bands were excised, extensively washed to remove glycine, and dried . Sequencing was performed by David Watson, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada .
Detection of peptidase activity against the truncated S-layer protein. A signal peptidase assay was performed to evaluate the peptidase activity in crude M . voltae membrane preparations against the truncated S-layer protein (Fig . 2A) . As revealed by Western blotting, the unprocessed S-layer band was found to decrease in intensity with time and a band with gradually increasing intensity was seen where the processed S-layer protein was expected . In control experiments where no M . voltae membranes or heat-treated (95°C for 5 min) M . voltae membranes were present (Fig . 2A and B), no evidence for processing of the S-layer was detected by Western blotting, indicating that the processing observed in the experimental set is directly attributable to the enzymatic activity present in the M . voltae membranes . These controls also indicate that the heat treatment used to prepare the S-layer-containing membranes effectively inactivated all E . coli signal peptidase I enzymatic activity against the archaeal substrate while leaving the S-layer substrate still amenable to processing .
Cloning and overexpression of the M . voltae type I signal peptidase. Using a heterologous probe from M . jannaschii followed by PCR, the putative type I signal peptidase gene of M . voltae was identified . It is 630 bp in length and encodes a protein of 210 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 24.6 kDa . When the His-tagged version of the protein was overexpressed and detected by Western blotting in E . coli, it had an apparent molecular mass of 21.5 kDa (Fig . 3A) . The gene is apparently transcribed as a monocistronic mRNA, as the gene for histone B is upstream and transcribed in the opposite direction while the gene for geranylgeranyl hydrogenase is downstream and also transcribed in the opposite direction . The intergenic region between the histone B gene and the signal peptidase gene is 222 bp, while that between the signal peptidase gene and the geranylgeranyl hydrogenase gene is 83 bp . The neighboring genes of the signal peptidase are different from those in the related methanogen M . jannaschii (6) . The secondary structure predicted for the M . voltae signal peptidase was examined by using the TMHMM program, version 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/) (17) . This program predicts that there are two transmembrane segments, one located at the very N terminus (amino acids 27 to 49) and the other located at the very C terminus (amino acids 176 to 198) of the protein, with the intervening sequence (amino acids 50 to 175) predicted to be located outside the cell (Fig . 3B) .
The substrate used in the in vitro assays for archaeal signal peptidase activity was the M . voltae S-layer protein, truncated to a size of 240 amino acids and His tagged at the C-terminal end, facilitating the detection of both the unprocessed and unprocessed forms with anti-His antibodies . When the cloned S-layer protein was overexpressed in E . coli, it was observed that the S-layer protein was recognized and properly processed at the native cleavage site (Fig . 1) . Around the S-layer signal sequence cleavage site are amino acids which are permissible for E . coli signal peptidase I recognition and cleavage (29) . When the truncated S-layer sequence was subjected to analysis by SignalP version 1.1, an online server that predicts the presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites in amino acid sequences from different organisms (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) (19), it was found that the signal peptide predicted for the M . voltae S-layer protein would be recognized by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well as eukaryotes . It was thus not surprising that when the truncated S-layer substrate was expressed in E . coli, both the unprocessed and the correctly processed forms were observed . However, at early time points following induction, the processed form was barely detectable in Western blots . Consequently, induction of S-layer synthesis for 30 min followed by a heating step to inactivate the native E . coli signal peptidase I activity was found to be an effective method of generating substrate for in vitro assays . Direct demonstration of expressed signal peptidase activity from the specific gene was achieved by performing the peptidase assay with the cloned M . voltae signal peptidase as the enzyme source under conditions that are nonpermissive for the E . coli signal peptidase but would still allow M . voltae signal peptidase to efficiently function . Using 1 M NaCl to inhibit the E . coli signal peptidase, significant signal peptidase activity was demonstrated for the membrane preparation of the BL21(De3)/pLysS strain harboring the M . voltae signal peptidase gene . The fact that significant activity was observed at 1 M NaCl clearly indicated that the enzymatic activity was directly attributable to the overexpressed M . voltae signal peptidase, since the E . coli signal peptidase, when used in this concentration, was demonstrated to be completely inhibited at this salt concentration (Fig . 4B and E), in agreement with early work on the salt dependence of the bacterial enzyme (32) . In fact, the E . coli signal peptidase demonstrated little to no activity even when the added membrane concentration was increased by 100-fold (40 µg) (Fig . 4A and D) . The lack of difference at 50 mM versus 1 M NaCl in the extents of processing of the membrane preparation of the BL21(De3)/pLysS strain harboring the M . voltae signal peptidase gene further reinforced the negligible role of the E . coli signal peptidase in processing the S-layer protein in the assays . The lack of processing observed in low salt concentration for the E . coli control membranes was somewhat surprising given that the S-layer is processed in vivo by E . coli . However, the presence of almost entirely unprocessed S-layer at early time points following induction of synthesis might suggest that the processing in vivo, while correct, is not very efficient . The in vitro assay, in addition, is optimized for the archaeal enzyme and may not be conducive to processing by the E . coli enzyme . There is a paucity of biochemically determined signal peptides reported for archaea in general and for M . voltae in particular . This means that the archaeal signal peptidases may have evolved to recognize certain features around the cleavage site that are not typical of bacterial signal peptides, even though in the case of the S-layer protein used here the cleavage sites for the bacterial and archaeal enzymes are the same . There are only limited data and predications of what archaeal signal peptides might look like (2, 4, 19); work on M . jannaschii has suggested that the signal peptides might be a bacterial and eukaryal hybrid . The mechanism of action of the archaeal signal peptidase has not been reported . The lack of the conserved lysine known to be important for the activity of the bacterial enzyme has been noted and is striking (13) . In the yeast Sec11p subunit of signal peptidase, site-directed mutagenesis has determined that a conserved serine, histidine, and two aspartic acids are important for activity, but this enzyme apparently lacks the catalytic lysine found in bacteria (30) . Indeed, it has been suggested based on the nonessential nature of all lysines in the eukaryotic signal peptidase that the type I signal peptidase family is actually composed of two groups, one with an essential catalytic lysine and one without (30) . Alignments of the M . voltae signal peptidase with the Sec11 subunit of the yeast signal peptidase indicate that the archaeal enzyme shares the four amino acids shown to be important in the eukaryotic enzyme (M . voltae signal peptidase amino acids Ser-52, His-122, Asp-142, and Asp-148 corresponding to Sec11 amino acids Ser-44, His-83, Asp-103, and Asp-109 [Fig . 5 ]) . Indeed, all putative archaeal signal peptidases possess the conserved serine and histidine and the large majority also contain the two aspartic acids (Fig . 5) (13) . The two essential aspartic acid residues in Sec11 have also been shown to align with aspartic acid residues in the bacterial enzyme (30), and in the bacterial case these aspartic acid residues are thought to play an important structural role in the enzyme (30) . It has not yet been determined whether the yeast enzyme uses a serine/histidine dyad for catalysis or whether one of the essential aspartic acids is also catalytic, resulting in a serine/histidine/aspartic acid catalytic site . However, it is clear that eukaryotic signal peptidases employ a different mechanism of action than the serine/lysine catalytic dyad used by bacterial signal peptidases . The conservation of the four essential amino acids in both the archaeal and eukaryotic enzymes, especially the replacement of the bacterial lysine with histidine, strongly suggests that the archaeal enzyme may have a eukaryal enzyme-like mechanism of action .
We thank S . Bardy, E . Chao, and N . Thomas for early contributions to this work and A . Kropinski for invaluable advice throughout the course of the work .
What Is Anthrax?,
What Is Biofilter?,
What Is Protein?,
What Is Genetic Engineering?,
What Is Genetics?,
n,
Microorganism,
i,
Microbiology,
i,
Bacteriology,
a,
Microbe,
a,
Bacteria,
s,
Microorganism,
r,
Escherichia coli,
n,
Bacteriophage,
o,
Wastewater,
n,
Growth media,
s,
Staphylococcus aureus,
n,
S. cerevisiae,
e,
Antimicrobial,
o,
Staphylococcus,
i,
Staphylococcus,
i,
Staphylococcus aureus,
r,
Thermophile,
r,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
a,
Cryptococci,
o,
Enterobacteriacea,
s,
Bacteria,
s,
Antibiotic prophylaxis,
i,
Clostridia,
a,
Yeasts,
o,
Staphylococcus aureus,
e,
Streptococci
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||