|
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2004, p . 2199-2205, Vol . 48, No . 6 Phosphorothioate Di- and Trinucleotides as a Novel Class of Anti-Hepatitis B Virus Agents
Radhakrishnan P . Iyer,1, Origenix Technologies, Inc., St . Laurent, Quebec, Canada,1 Institute for Antiviral Research, Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences Department, Utah State University, Logan, Utah,2 Georgetown University, Division of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Rockville, Maryland3 Received 20 March 2003/ Returned for modification 13 June 2003/ Accepted 25 November 2003
Given a lack of sufficient structural information on new targets, an approach that seems appropriate for antiviral drug discovery is the screening of structurally diverse compounds, generated using combinatorial approaches that would modulate biological pathways without regard to specific molecular targets . In theory, this approach would allow simultaneous functional validation of a target, as well as the discovery of a lead structure that modulates the function of the target . This strategy has been variously referred to as "diversity-oriented organic synthesis for therapeutic target validation" or "combinatorial target-guided ligand assembly" (6, 20) . We describe here the application of this concept for the discovery of anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) agents . In recent publications, we have reported methods of assembling various classes of di- and trinucleotide libraries (7, 8, 18) . Through screening, as well as lead optimization work, and in conjunction with cell-based assays, we have discovered that certain molecules show very promising anti-HBV activity . Furthermore, some of these molecules display synergistic activity when used in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), the two nucleoside analogs currently licensed for the treatment of chronic HBV infection . This work summarizes the in vitro analysis and preliminary toxicity evaluation of these compounds . (A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 14th International Conference for Antiviral Research, Seattle, Washington, 8 to 12 April 2001.)
Antiviral analysis. For the antiviral analyses, confluent cultures of 2.2.15 (21) cells were maintained on 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates in RPMI 1640 medium with 2% fetal bovine serum (11) . Cultures (six per each test concentration on two replicate plates) were treated with nine consecutive daily doses of the test compounds . Medium was changed daily with fresh test compounds . HBV nucleic acid and protein levels were measured 24 h after the last treatment . Extracellular (virion) HBV DNA levels were assessed by quantitative blot hybridization (11) . Intracellular HBV DNA levels were measured by quantitative Southern blot hybridization (11) . Uptake of neutral red dye was used to determine the relative level of toxicity 24 h following the last treatment (11) . The A510 of internalized dye was used for the semiquantitative analysis . Values are presented as a percentage of the average A510 values (± standard deviations) in nine separate cultures of untreated cells maintained on the 96-well plates seeded at the same time with the identical pool of stock cells used for the antiviral analyses and maintained in an identical manner . A total of three cultures were treated with each concentration of test compound . Combination treatments. Combination treatments were conducted as previously described (9) . Briefly, two agents were mixed together at a predetermined concentration ratio . The relative ratios of the individual agents were based on the monotherapy values of each compound (drug concentrations at which a 10-fold reduction of HBV DNA was observed [EC90s]) . For each combination of agents, three concentration ratios, centered upon the use of the compounds at equipotent antiviral concentrations, were used . A dilution series (six threefold-concentration steps, beginning at the approximate EC90s) was then generated with the concentration ratio of the two agents remaining the same in each dilution step . Separate dilution series of monotherapy with each individual antiviral agent at the same concentrations were also used to treat cultures in the same experiment . Toxicity analyses were performed as described above for the monotherapies . Analysis of drug interactions in the combination studies was determined by the use of the CALCUSYN program (Biosoft, Inc., Cambridge, United Kingdom) . This program evaluates synergy, additivity, or antagonism by use of several methodologies, including that of Chou and Talalay with a statistical analysis employing the Monte Carlo technique (3) to provide confidence limits, fraction-affected-confidence interval (FA-CI) plots, isobolograms, and median-effect plots . Analysis of HBV polymerase activity and HBV protein expression. An endogenous DNA polymerase activity assay was performed as previously described (14) . Briefly, Huh7 cells transfected with HBV DNA were treated with 10 or 50 µM concentrations of test compounds for 72 h . HBV cores were then immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and endogenous polymerase activity was quantified by phosphorimager analysis of band intensities, normalized to that of core proteins from untreated controls . Intracellular HBV RNA levels in 2.2.15 cells were measured by quantitative Northern blot hybridization (13) . Extracellular HBV surface (HBsAg) and e (HBeAg) antigen levels produced from 2.2.15 cells were evaluated by semiquantitative enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods using commercial kits (HBsAg, Abbott Laboratories; HBeAg, Diasorin, Inc.) as previously described (12) . Intracellular HBV core antigen (HBcAg) levels in 2.2.15 cells were assessed using a semiquantitative EIA as previously described (12) . 3TC-resistant HBV mutants. Analysis of antiviral activity against clinically relevant HBV mutants associated with resistance to 3TC and famciclovir was performed using a previously described transfection-based assay (25) . For these studies, Huh7 cell cultures were treated with four consecutive daily doses of the test compounds beginning 4 days posttransfection . HBV constructs were those described by Allen et al . (1), and the nomenclature for the drug-resistant mutants is that described by Stuyver et al . (23) . Additional analyses. Additional cytotoxicity analyses were conducted in the following cell lines as previously described (4): MDBK cells, human foreskin fibroblasts, Vero cells, and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells . In brief, solutions of the compounds were prepared at concentrations of 100, 300, and 1,000 µM in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum . The cells were plated in 96-well plates . After 24 h, the compounds were added and the cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 days . Relative viability was assessed by the addition of the MTT dye solution (G401B; Promega, Inc.) to the wells . The A570 was recorded . An in vitro antiviral selectivity assay was conducted against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as follows (17) . Cord blood mononuclear cells were infected with HIV type 1 IIIb (laboratory strain) for 2 h . The free virus was washed off, and the cells were transferred to plates . The compounds were added as a solution in water . Following 7 days of incubation in culture, the reverse transcriptase (RT) activity of the supernatant was measured to determine antiviral activity as previously described (17) . Selectivity assays against other viruses were performed using standard cytopathic effect assays as previously described (7) . Liver microsomal assays were conducted as previously described (5) . Briefly, incubations were performed in triplicate at 37°C using 1 and 10 µM concentrations of the compounds in human and mouse liver microsomes, and results were analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography after 1 h (8) .
None of the analogs tested induced significant reductions in the levels of intracellular HBV RNA or in the levels of extracellular HBsAg, extracellular HBeAg, or intracellular HBcAg produced by 2.2.15 cells in this assay as assessed by semiquantitative EIA (12), and none of them affected the levels of intracellular core particles as assessed by an immune blot assay (14) (data not shown) . Combination treatments. All three analogs appeared to work cooperatively overall in combination with 3TC (Table 2; Fig . 3) . In essentially all mixtures examined, these compounds acted in a generally synergistic manner against HBV production in 2.2.15 cells . Combinations of the compounds and ADV generally exhibited less favorable interactions (Table 2; Fig . 3) . In several instances, antagonistic interactions with ADV were observed, and only the trinucleotide, ORI-7170, exhibited synergistic interactions with this nucleotide analog . The most favorable interactions in the combination treatments were generally observed at lower relative concentrations of 3TC, and at higher relative concentrations of ADV, to the analogs . The cytotoxicity profiles for these compounds were not changed by the addition of either 3TC or ADV in these combination treatments (Table 2) .
Activity against 3TC-resistant HBV. In a standard DNA-transfection assay (25), analogs ORI-7246 and ORI-9020 were active against 3TC-resistant HBV variants (Table 3) . Essentially identical potencies were observed against wild-type virus and constructs carrying either C domain (M204V/I) or B domain (L180M) mutations (1) that are clinically known to confer differing levels of resistance to 3TC (but not ADV) .
Our antiviral drug discovery strategy was to design a library of small molecules that mimic the repertoire of interactions that exist among nucleic acids and proteins . Many structural and functional proteins are known to contain nucleotide-binding domains within protein
The library members screened in this study are all D-nucleoside analogs and possess most of the key diversity attributes enunciated above . Synthesis of these compounds and the design rationale have been described in detail elsewhere (7, 8, 18) . A key structural feature of the members of the library is that the 3'-5' di- or trinucleotides carry phosphorothioate and phosphoramidate internucleotidic modifications which are expected to provide desirable metabolic stability to the compounds when used in cell-based assays . The phosphorothioates could also potentially participate in electrostatic interactions, while the nonionic phosphoramidates could facilitate hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions with the target receptor and also facilitate delivery into cells . Our results suggest that replacement of the phosphorothioate by phosphoramidate resulted in much-reduced activity of the compounds . The dominant furanose modification was the substitution of a 2'-OMe group in place of a 2'-hydrogen in the deoxyribofuranoside ring . The 2' substituent can act as a conformational switch that transforms the furanose ring pucker from 2'-endo to 3'-endo, thereby affecting the global conformation of the individual library members (e.g., compound ORI-9020) . The nucleobase modifications included both the replacement of the parent heterocyclic moiety and substitution on the heterocycle that provided additional hydrophobicity to the library members (compound ORI-7246 has a deaza-adenosine moiety) . The data obtained in this study are consistent with a mechanism of action centered on a direct interference with HBV DNA replication . In theory, this could be accomplished by direct termination of DNA replication by the HBV polymerase (RT and/or DNA polymerase) by incorporation followed by chain termination or by direct interaction with the polymerase to prevent further binding and elongation of DNA (e.g., noncompetitive inhibition with deoxynucleoside triphosphates) . However, there is currently no evidence of either intracellular phosphorylation of these compounds (7, 8, 18) or their incorporation into HBV DNA . The patterns of HBV DNA replication intermediates (RIs) resulting from inhibition by the test compound show no accumulation of minus strand HBV DNA (the first strand synthesized by the HBV RT) . This pattern is similar to that observed for inhibition of HBV replication induced by the internal assay control compound, 3TC, a documented inhibitor of HBV RT and, to a lesser extent, HBV DNA polymerase (22) . This pattern of inhibition is distinctly different from that induced by inhibition of HBV replication by ara-AMP in 2.2.15 cells (a well-characterized inhibitor of DNA polymerase with no documented activity against HBV RT) in which a substantial accumulation of negative-strand DNA is observed (10) . The present data are consistent with an inhibition of the HBV RT-directed priming step prior to elongation of the negative (first) strand of HBV DNA . This could conceivably take place either by direct interaction with the polymerase or by competition for the binding of the four-base primer sequence to the initiation site for elongation of the HBV negative strand of DNA . The lack of a change in HBV RNA levels indicates that the test compounds did not directly interfere with the transcription of HBV RNA, and indicates that the molecules were not acting by mechanisms similar to those associated with antisense oligonucleotides (12) . The lack of change in HBV protein levels is consistent with the observation that HBV RNA levels were not changed and makes it unlikely that the compounds were inhibiting HBV production by a direct interference in virus protein production . It is possible that other steps, such as packaging of viral RNA into the HBV core or encapsidation of the HBV nucleocapsid by surface antigen, may be inhibited by the test compounds . Alternatively, secondary processing (e.g., glycosylation or phosphorylation) could also be affected by the test compounds . Such alterations would not change the apparent levels of the HBV proteins as assessed by EIA analysis, but could change their properties . However, alteration of the glycosylation patterns of the HBV surface antigens by the test compounds is unlikely in that one consequence of such changes is a dramatic intracellular accumulation of HBV DNA RIs (15), which was not observed in these experiments . The compounds identified in this study appear to act cooperatively in combination with 3TC, although less promising interactions with ADV were observed . The mechanisms related to the observed interactions are currently unclear, but the apparent differences in interactions between the di- and trinucleotides and these nucleoside analogs may be an indication of potential differences in intracellular metabolism or mechanisms of activity against HBV . Since these compounds are not phosphorylated and do not appear to be inhibitors of HBV polymerase via incorporation, cooperative effects with potent nucleoside analogs are not unexpected . These observations, along with apparent activity against several known HBV drug-resistant mutants, a promising lack of cytotoxicity in standard cell culture assays, and stability in liver microsomal assays, make these compounds excellent candidates for animal testing and potential clinical studies .
We thank Mark Wainberg, McGill AIDS Center, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Montreal, Quebec, Canada), for the screening of compounds against HIV . We thank Guy Boivin, University of Laval (Laval, Quebec, Canada), for screening of the compounds against herpes simplex virus and human cytomegalovirus . We also thank In Vitro Technologies (Baltimore, Md.) for the in vitro metabolism studies of the compounds . We thank Robert E . Lanford (Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas) for the HBV polymerase assays . The HBV mutant constructs were provided by L . Condreay (Glaxo-SmithKline) .
What Is Water Purification?,
What Is Yeast?,
What Is Bioassay?,
What Is Rhizobia?,
What Is Bioremediation?,
r,
Bacteriology,
a,
Microbes,
a,
Microbe,
i,
Bacteria,
i,
Microorganism,
o,
Prokaryotes,
c,
Staphylococcus aureus,
e,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Microbiological,
o,
Antibiotic treatment,
e,
Salmonella,
r,
Growth media,
i,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Streptococci,
o,
Clostridia,
n,
Microorganism,
e,
Listeriosis,
n,
Candida albicans,
n,
Botulin,
a,
Botulin,
e,
Corynebacter,
r,
Bacillus,
o,
Prokaryotes,
r,
Shigella,
o,
Yeasts,
a,
Escherichia coli
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||