|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2003, p . 1967-1975, Vol . 185, No . 6 Global Characterization of Disulfide Stress in Bacillus subtilisLars Ingo Ole Leichert, Christian Scharf, and Michael Hecker* Institut für Mikrobiologie, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Received 30 September 2002/ Accepted 30 December 2002
Disulfide bonds play a major role in stabilizing protein structures, and extracellular proteins are particularly dependent on disulfide bonds to stabilize their structure (4) . Nonnative disulfide bonds, on the other hand, may lead to protein misfolding . In some proteins, disulfide bridges are also found transiently as part of their catalytic cycle . Examples include ribonucleotide reductase, methionine sulfoxide reductase, alkylhydroperoxide reductase, and arsenate reductase (10) . Other proteins possess cysteines as molecular redox switches that control their activity; some examples include the transcriptional factors NF- Up to now, most studies on the response of bacteria to oxidative stress have concentrated on the reaction to hydrogen peroxide, alkylhydroperoxide, and superoxide-induced stress . Very little is, however, known about disulfide stress, a subcategory of oxidative stress that causes the accumulation of nonnative disulfide bonds in the cytoplasm . The disulfide stress regulon was analyzed in Streptomyces coelicolor with a new sigma factor, sigma R, whose activity is controlled by the redox-regulated anti-sigma factor RsrA (14, 20) . The goal of our study was to get a global insight into changes in mRNA expression and protein synthesis that occur in response to an excessive oxidation of free cellular thiols and thus to enhance our understanding of the oxidative stress response . We have used diamide [diazenedicarboxylic acid bis(N,N-dimethylamide)], a specific oxidant for thiols, to induce disulfide stress in the gram-positive soil bacterium B . subtilis . Diamide reacts with free thiols according the scheme presented in Fig . 1; the end products are a disulfide bond and a hydrazine derivative (see reference 15 for a review) . The global response of B . subtilis to disulfide stress was examined by transcriptome analyses on DNA macroarrays and by proteome analyses by using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) .
For measurement of diamide absorption in the medium, 2-ml aliquots of the cultures were harvested on ice and immediately centrifuged for 1 min (13,000 x g at 4°C) . Subsequently, the supernatant was filtered . The amount of diamide was measured by absorption at 303 nm . Preparation of the L-[35S]methionine-labeled cytoplasmic protein fraction. Exponentially growing B . subtilis cells in synthetic medium were pulse-labeled for 5 min with 50 µCi of L-[35S]methionine per 5 ml of culture when the OD540 reached 0.4 immediately before and 10, 30, 50, and 125 min after the addition of 1 mM diamide . Incorporation was stopped by the addition of chloramphenicol to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml, with an excess of unlabeled L-methionine (10 mM final concentration), and by transferring the cultures to ice . Cells were washed twice in 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5)-1 mM EDTA and then sonicated in 800 µl of 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5)-1 mM EDTA-1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride . The soluble cell fraction was separated from cell debris and insoluble proteins by centrifugation for 30 min at 12,000 x g at 4°C . 2D-PAGE and data analysis. 2D-PAGE was performed as previously described (5) . Aliquots (80 µg for analytical gels and 250 µg for preparative gels) of crude protein extracts were loaded into 8 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mg of CHAPS {3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate}/ml, and 5.2 µl of Pharmalyte 3-10 (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany)/ml on immobilized pH gradient gel strips covering a pH range of 4 to 7 (Immobiline IPG-Strips; Amersham Biosciences) . After fixation in 50% (vol/vol) methanol-7% (vol/vol) acetic acid, preparative gels were stained with Sypro Ruby (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany) according to the recommendations of the manufacturer . Analytical gels were silver stained as previously described (5), dried on blotting paper, and exposed to phosphor screens (Molecular Dynamics) . These autoradiographs were collected with the PhosphorImager SI Scanner (Molecular Dynamics), and data were analyzed by quantitative comparison of the control 2D protein pattern with that of the diamide-treated cells by using Delta2D software (version 2.1; Decodon GmbH, Greifswald, Germany) . Peptide mass fingerprinting. For identification of proteins from preparative 2D gels, in-gel digestion and protein extraction were performed (D . Becher and K . Büttner, unpublished method) . The peptide solutions were applied to a sample template and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS; Voyager DE-STR; Perseptive Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) . Afterward, peptide mass fingerprints were analyzed by using MS-Fit software [http://prospector.ucsf.edu/ucsfhtml4.0/msfit.htm] (9) . RNA isolation and Northern blotting. Immediately before and 10, 30, and 50 min after the addition of 1 mM diamide to an exponentially growing culture of B . subtilis, aliquots were removed, rapidly chilled by the addition of an equal volume of ice-cold 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-5 mM MgCl2-20 mM NaN3, and centrifuged (3 min, 5,000 x g, 4°C) . The supernatant was rapidly removed, and cells were disrupted in liquid nitrogen in a grinding mill (Mikro-Dismembrator S; B . Braun Biotech International GmbH, Melsungen, Germany) . The RNA was isolated as previously described (21) . Northern blot analysis was performed according to the method of Wetzstein et al . (27) . Digoxigenin-labeled probes for clpE, ylnD, gsiB, and trxA were obtained in vitro with T7 RNA polymerase from T7 RNA promoter containing PCR products of the respective genes . DNA macroarray experiments and data analysis. DNA macroarray analysis was performed with 33P-labeled cDNA on Panorama B . subtilis gene arrays (Sigma Genosys, Ltd., Pampisford, United Kingdom) as previously described (11) . The hybridized arrays were exposed to phosphor screens . The autoradiograph was analyzed by using the STORM 840 scanner (Molecular Dynamics) . Hybridization signals were quantified with ArrayVision software (version 6.0; Imaging Research, St . Catharines, Ontario, Canada) . The background was defined as the median of signals surrounding local spot groups . For every gene, an "artifact-reduced" volume of blackness was obtained by replacing pixels in a spot clipping 10% above or below the median blackness of the surrounding pixels . For these artifact-reduced spots, a normalized volume was evaluated by (i) calculating the volume of an average spot by dividing the sum of the volumes of all artifact-reduced spots on the array by the total number of spots and (ii) dividing the volume of the individual artifact-reduced spot by the volume of this average spot . For the control values and each time point, mRNA was prepared from two independent cultivations and then used for independent cDNA synthesis and DNA array hybridization experiments . For each cultivation and every time point, an induction ratio for every individual gene was calculated by dividing the average of the normalized, artifact-reduced volume of each replica spot on the array after treatment with 1 mM diamide by the corresponding volume on the control array . Only genes that showed (i) at least a threefold induction in both experiments and (ii) whose volume was at least two standard deviations above that of the local background level upon diamide treatment were considered to be significantly induced . The genes were flagged if (i) the volume of at least one replica spot on at least one control array was less than a twofold standard deviation above the background level as "minimal induction value" (as an improper detection of a spot in the control array would possibly lead to a higher volume than the actual volume and thus to a lower induction rate) and (ii) the induction factor differed by more than 100% in both experiments and the value closer to 1 was chosen as a "safe value" for the induction factor . Otherwise, the average of both experiments was stated . Lists for significantly repressed genes were prepared accordingly (but volumes had to be at least twofold standard deviations above that of the local background on the control array and were flagged as a "minimal repression value" if close to the detection limit upon diamide treatment) . This very stringent method should exclude the majority of false-positive results . For the same reason, however, it is likely that not all genes affected by disulfide stress were detected .
Transcriptome and proteome analyses. To characterize the changes in gene expression and protein synthesis, we used the transcriptome and proteome approach . For transcriptome experiments, exponentially growing cells of B . subtilis 168 (OD540 of 0.4) were treated with 1 mM diamide . Prior to diamide treatment and 10, 30, and 50 min after the addition of diamide to the medium, cells were harvested and the RNA was isolated . The quality of RNA was analyzed by performing Northern blot analyses for selected genes (see Table 2) . 33P-labeled cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription with an oligonucleotide primer mix composed of specific primers (Sigma Genosys) for each of the 4,101 genes that encode mRNAs in B . subtilis . This radioactive cDNA mixture was then hybridized on DNA macroarrays of spots containing oligonucleotides corresponding to each of the 4,101 open reading frames of B . subtilis (Sigma Genosys) . After computer-based comparison of control RNAs and RNAs of diamide-treated cells, induction and repression factors were calculated for each gene . Genes that (i) were in both experiments induced at least threefold at a given time point and that (ii) possessed a volume at least two standard deviations above the local background level on all replica spots on the arrays obtained upon diamide treatment at that given time point were defined as significantly induced for that time point . Significantly repressed genes were defined accordingly but had to be repressed threefold and to possess a volume of at least two standard deviations above the local background level on the arrays obtained immediately before diamide treatment . Lists of genes that are significantly induced and repressed by disulfide stress were prepared, and for each gene in this list quality flags concerning detectability and reproducability were assigned . Upon disulfide stress induction in B . subtilis, 350 genes were induced more than threefold and 578 genes were repressed more than threefold at at least one of the given time points of 10, 30, and 50 min after the addition of diamide in two independent experiments . At all three time points, as many as 141 genes were induced more than threefold, whereas 228 genes were repressed at all time points (Table 1) .
Disulfide stress is an inducer of class III heat shock genes and other genes related to heat shock. A group of genes most strongly induced by disulfide stress in both transcriptome and proteome experiments were the class III heat shock genes (clpC, clpP, and clpE) controlled by the global repressor CtsR (see reference 23 for a review) (Table 3) . The gene clpC is located in an operon with ctsR and the modulators of CtsR repression mcsA and mcsB . McsA contains two putative zinc finger motifs, each consisting of two conserved CXXC motifs . In its native state, McsA binds CtsR, thereby preventing McsB from inactivating CtsR (16) . Electrospray ionization-quadrupole TOF-MS experiments on His6-tagged purified recombinant McsA showed that the CXXC motifs are easily oxidized, indicating that this protein might be the molecular interface for oxidative stress activation of class III heat shock proteins (data not shown) . Protein stress caused by the formation of disulfide bonds of cysteine side chains, subsequently leading to misfolded proteins and toxic protein aggregates, might not be the only reason for induction of the specific heat stress response . Direct sensing of disulfide stress by McsA could also lead to the induction of the class III heat shock regulon . The similar induction pattern of all CtsR-regulated genes upon diamide treatment was confirmed by clustering the transcriptome data by using GeneSpring software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, Calif.) . By subjecting the kinetic data to the changing method, the class III heat shock genes occurred in one distinct cluster, indicating a disulfide stress specific regulation by one common mechanism (data not shown) . We also determined that a number of class I heat shock genes, such as hrcA itself, dnaK, and groES, under the control of the global regulator HrcA were induced upon diamide treatment, albeit to a lesser extent, mainly 10 min after addition of diamide (Table 3) .
Only very few of the class II heat shock genes that are controlled by the alternative sigma factor
Disulfide stress triggers the "stringent response." B . subtilis cells that were exposed to disulfide stress seemed to induce the stringent response . Both the proteomic and the transcriptomic patterns showed a massive downregulation of a large number of vegetative genes (Fig . 4 and 5) . More than 80% of the recently described 141 negatively stringently controlled genes in B . subtilis (11), including genes for ribosomal proteins and housekeeping genes, are repressed at least threefold by disulfide stress, suggesting that disulfide stress could lead to a stalling of the ribosomes and, thus, to the release of the alarmone ppGpp . A similar stalling of the ribosome through oxidation of the CXXC motif of ribosomal protein L31 as an effect of disulfide stress in S . coelicolor was suggested by Paget et al . (20) and in E . coli oxidative stress leads to increased levels of ppGpp (26) and induction of the stringent response (7) . Interestingly, rpmE, the gene encoding L31, is one of two negatively stringently controlled genes encoding ribosomal proteins that are not repressed significantly by disulfide stress in our study . The stringent response does not only include genes that are strongly repressed but also genes that are RelA-dependently induced (11) . The part of positively stringently controlled genes that is induced by disulfide stress is much smaller, and only 20% of all genes described by Eymann et al . were found to be induced . Positively stringently controlled genes related to amino acid biosynthesis were not induced except for genes involved in cysteine biosynthesis (Table 3 and Fig . 5) . This suggests that free cysteines in B . subtilis could play a role as a low-molecular-weight thiol antioxidant similar to glutathione in other organisms (B . subtilis possesses no glutathione system) . It is also noteworthy that two positively stringently controlled regulative genes of unknown function, yvyD and ytzE, were induced by disulfide stress as well . Other findings. Many genes encoding regulators or putative regulators seem to play a role in the disulfide stress response . A total of 17 genes that are known to be involved in regulation and initiation of RNA synthesis (according to the functional categories of SubtiList database [http://genolist.pasteur.fr/SubtiList] [19]) were induced by more than threefold 10 min after the addition of diamide to the medium . Fifty minutes after the addition of diamide, 24 regulatory genes were induced, indicating that there is not only a primary and one-dimensional cellular response but also a cascade of different secondary and even tertiary responses to disulfide stress . This became also apparent by the finding that the total numbers of genes that were significantly induced and repressed increased over time from 196 to 290 and from 308 to 469, respectively (Table 1) . Among these regulators were, in addition to the already-mentioned regulators HrcA, CtsR, PerR, YtzE, and YvyD, also several other regulators whose regulons still need to be characterized . Other genes that attracted our attention were genes involved in the detoxification of heavy metals and other toxic elements . The arsenic resistance operon consisting of the gene of the repressor arsR, the arsenite transporter arsB, arsenate reductase arsC, and yqcK are upregulated significantly at all time points . Also, the cadmium resistance gene yvgW and the three upstream genes, including its possible positive regulator yvgY (25), were among the genes most strongly induced by disulfide stress (Table 3) . In proteins involved in resistance to toxic elements, reduced cysteines often play a major role in either binding and/or reducing the toxic elements and therefore are crucial for the activity of the detoxifying enzymes (18, 24) . A total of 137 of the genes that are induced significantly by disulfide stress at least at one of the time points chosen were of unknown function . This high number demonstrates that our knowledge of bacterial genomes is still far from being complete, but further comparison of expression profiles under different conditions could unravel the functions of some of these genes . Conclusion. It has previously been assumed that disulfide stress is just a subset of the oxidative stress response . Recent reports showing that the expression of whole regulons is controlled by redox-active cysteines have brought disulfide stress into focus (20, 28) . This provides a preliminary indication that the disulfide stress response is different from the "classic" oxidative stress response induced by hydrogen peroxide and the superoxide stress induced by paraquat . Here we report a genome-wide analysis of the influence of disulfide stress on the transcriptional and protein expression pattern in B . subtilis . We found 350 genes were induced and 578 genes were repressed upon diamide treatment . Thus, disulfide stress affected more than 20% of all 4,101 B . subtilis genes . The adaptation of B . subtilis to disulfide stress seems to be remarkably complex, and the response to disulfide stress appears to be a combination of different regulatory networks that involve genes from the oxidative stress response, the heat and protein stress response, the stringent response, and the heavy metal stress response . This suggests that redox-active cysteines might act as molecular switches in key positions of the regulation cascade of particular regulons, as suggested for PerR, the regulator of the peroxide regulon (8) . Indeed, oxidative stress genes under control of PerR were among the strongest induced genes influenced by disulfide stress . The proposed role of redox-active cysteines in the ribosomal protein L31 in stalling ribosomes (20) is supported by the finding that disulfide stress induces the stringent response in B . subtilis . New candidates for regulators with possible redox-active cysteines are McsA, whose oxidation could lead to the high induction levels of the class III heat shock regulon observed after disulfide stress, and the regulator of the arsenic resistance operon ArsR . These combined transcriptome and proteome analyses open up a broad and panoramic view of the response of the soil bacterium B . subtilis to the challenge of disulfide stress and let us anticipate the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms triggered directly or indirectly by a disturbance in the thiol-disulfide state within the cell .
This work was supported by grants of the DFG, the BMBF (031U107A/031U207A), the EU consortium (GLG2-CT-1999-01455), the Bildungsministerium Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (0100420), and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie to M.H .
What Is Bioassay?,
What Is Fermentation?,
What Is Activated Sludge?,
What Is Nitrification?,
What Is Listeria Monocytogenes?,
n,
Microorganism,
r,
Microbes,
r,
Bacteria,
i,
Microbe,
o,
Microorganisms,
a,
Denitrifying,
o,
Shigella,
i,
Bacteriological,
e,
Bacillus,
o,
Yeasts,
e,
Microorganisms,
c,
Bacteriological,
o,
Bacteriological,
s,
Broth cultures,
a,
Antibiotic treatment,
e,
Pasteurella,
o,
S. cerevisiae,
i,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Escherichia coli,
c,
Bacteriological,
r,
Salmonella,
n,
Microbial,
s,
Broth cultures,
e,
Bacillus,
c,
Escherichia coli,
e,
Escherichia coli
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||