|
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2004, p . 1908-1911, Vol . 48, No . 5 Novel Inhalational Murine Model of Invasive Pulmonary AspergillosisDonald C . Sheppard,1 Gunter Rieg,1 Lisa Y . Chiang,1 Scott G . Filler,1,2 John E . Edwards Jr.,1,2 and Ashraf S . Ibrahim1,2* St . John's Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Torrance, California 90502,1 The David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 900242 Received 4 December 2003/ Returned for modification 31 December 2003/ Accepted 15 January 2004
IA is initiated by the inhalation of small numbers of A . fumigatus conidia which, by virtue of their small size, evade the mucociliary barrier of the bronchial airways and are deposited in the pulmonary alveoli (7) . In the immunosuppressed host, conidia germinate to produce invasive hyphal forms, which propagate by extension and invade local pulmonary tissues . Angioinvasion is a prominent histopathological and clinical feature of IA and is likely the mechanism for dissemination of hyphal fragments to other organs in a subset of patients . We have developed a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis that recapitulates many of the key factors of human IA . By using an inhalation chamber, a relatively small number of conidia are delivered by small-particle aerosol to immunocompromised mice . This delivery system is reproducible both among mice within an experiment and between experiments . This route of inoculation results in a lethal infection in 60 to 75% of animals within 16 days . Additionally, we show that amphotericin B (AMB) is protective in this model . Strains and media. A . fumigatus strain AF293 (a generous gift from P . Magee) was used for all experiments in this study . To prepare the inoculum, A . fumigatus was grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates for 2 weeks at 37°C . Conidia were collected by flooding the plates with sterile phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% (vol/vol) Tween 80 . The conidia were concentrated by centrifugation and counted using a hemacytometer . Inhalation apparatus. To infect animals via inhalation, we adapted the aerosol chamber described by Pal and Horwitz (10) for use with A . fumigatus conidia (Fig . 1) . Mice were introduced via a hinged doorway to a Plexiglas exposure chamber (South Bay Plastics, Torrance, Calif.) . The inoculum was introduced by aerosolizing a conidial suspension with a small-particle nebulizer (Hudson Micro Mist; Hudson RCI, Temecula, Calif.) driven by compressed air at 100 lb/in2 . The nebulizer was connected to a channel that ran along the top of the chamber and vented the aerosol from the middle of the chamber ceiling . A standard exposure time of 1 h was used for all experiments to allow time for complete aerosolization and uniform exposure of the mice . The entire apparatus was contained within a laminar flow hood in a negative pressure room . Multiple immunosuppressive regimens and inocula were evaluated as outlined below . In all experiments, mice were infected 2 days after the initiation of immunosuppression and received daily ceftazidime (Western Medical Supply, Arcadia, Calif.) at 5 mg in a 0.2-ml volume per mouse subcutaneously for 10 days to protect against bacterial infection .
Titration of infectious inoculum. As an initial step in the evaluation of the aerosol chamber, mice were exposed to aerosols generated from conidial suspensions of various concentrations . Immediately after exposure, mice were sacrificed, and the lungs were homogenized and quantitatively cultured to determine the number of conidia delivered to the lungs . Nebulizing 12 ml of a suspension containing 1 x 109 conidia per ml delivered a reproducible number of conidia per mouse within and between experiments (median, 2.4 x 103 CFU/mouse; interquartile range [IQR], 2.2 x 103 to 2.9 x 103 [results from three independent experiments of three animals each]) . Lower-concentration conidial suspensions resulted in both lower conidial delivery and more mouse-to-mouse variability in inoculum (data not shown) . Therefore, 12 ml of a suspension containing 1 x 109 conidia/ml was used for all subsequent experiments . Immunosuppression. Mice were rendered susceptible to infection with A . fumigatus by immunosuppression with a combination of cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate . Cyclophosphamide (Western Medical Supply) was reconstituted in sterile distilled water and administered via intraperitoneal injection . Cortisone acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, St . Louis, Mo.) was prepared as a suspension in sterile phosphate-buffered saline with 0.02% Tween 80 and given by subcutaneous injection . To determine the duration of leukopenia resulting from immunosuppression, serial tail vein phlebotomy (10-µl sample) was performed on groups of five mice, and leukocytes were enumerated by using the Unopette system (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, N.H.) . A single dose of cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg of body weight) and cortisone acetate (250 mg/kg) resulted in profound leukopenia for 6 days . However, mice treated with this combination did not consistently develop a lethal infection, even when exposed to the highest aerosol concentrations (data not shown) . Increasing the dose of cyclophosphamide to 250 mg/kg increased the duration of leukopenia by only 1 day (data not shown) . Therefore, mice were given an initial dose of cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate (250 mg/kg for both drugs) and then a second dose of cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) combined with cortisone acetate (250 mg/kg) 5 days later (Fig . 2) . This regimen extended the duration of leukopenia to 9 to 10 days, providing 7 to 8 days of leukopenia after infection and permitting the development of lethal infection (see below) . With this combination, uninfected mice had lost more than 20% of their initial body weight and were too ill to receive further immunosuppression . This regimen was therefore used for all subsequent experiments .
The murine model described here is unique in that infection is initiated with a relatively small infectious inoculum, and consequently, the duration of infection is significantly longer than in models of IA which use a higher inoculum (104 to 109 depending on immunosuppressive regimen and strain of A . fumigatus) to initiate infection and result in a more precipitous course of disease (3, 5, 7) . The initiation of infection with an inoculum that approximates that of human infection has important implications for the testing of novel therapeutics and diagnostic strategies . Inoculum size is particularly relevant when testing an antifungal compound for prophylaxis against IA . Since such an agent needs only to be active against the relatively small number of conidia being inhaled on a daily basis, it may perform adequately as a prophylactic agent and yet fail to demonstrate efficacy when tested in models that utilize higher infectious inocula . Furthermore, in the inhalational model described here, mice survived for 5 to 15 days after infection . Not only does this subacute course parallel the development of human IA, but it also provides a reasonable window for the study of antifungal agents as well as diagnostic modalities designed to detect early disease . In addition to these therapeutic considerations, the use of a low-dose inhalational model should more faithfully recapitulate the human host response to IA . Since the immune response to a wide range of pathogens has been shown to be dependent on inoculum (9, 11), approximating an inoculum similar to that found in human IA provides an appropriate model for studying the pathogenesis of IA . This inhalational model of IA provides a simple method to study this important fungal infection . It is inexpensive, with an initial chamber construction cost of approximately $200 and the nebulizers costing only $1 to $2 each . This model provides an alternative to existing intranasal models of infection and may offer new insights into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of IA .
This project was supported in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, under contract no . N01-AI-30041 and by a grant from Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals Inc . D.C.S . is supported by a Burroughs Welcome Fund Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences and a Clinician Scientist award from the Canadian Institutes of Health . A.S.I . and S.G.F . are supported by Burroughs Welcome Fund New Investigator Awards in Molecular Pathogenic Mycology .
What Is Bioengineering?,
What Is Nitrification?,
What Is Activated Sludge?,
What Is Botulism?,
What Is Anthrax?,
i,
Microbes,
e,
Microorganism,
r,
Microorganisms,
e,
Microbiology,
o,
Bacterium,
o,
Rhodotorula,
n,
Culture medium,
e,
Nitrifying,
a,
Gram negative,
c,
Vancomycin,
e,
Multidrug resistant,
o,
Multidrug resistant,
n,
Bacteriological,
e,
Prokaryotes,
c,
Yeasts,
o,
Bacillus,
c,
Botulin,
i,
Staphylococcus,
n,
S. cerevisiae,
s,
Antimicrobial,
n,
Clostridia,
n,
Microbial,
o,
Neisseria,
o,
Gram negative,
i,
Staphylococcus,
s,
Shigella
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||