|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2004, p . 842-849, Vol . 186, No . 3 Regulation of L-Alanine Dehydrogenase in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv . viciae and Its Role in Pea NodulesEmma Lodwig,1 Shalini Kumar,1 David Allaway,1 Alex Bourdes,1 Jürgen Prell,2 Ursula Priefer,2 and Philip Poole1* Division of Microbiology, School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AJ, United Kingdom,1 Ökologie des Bodens, Botanisches Institut, RWTH-Aachen, 52056 Aachen, Germany2 Received 29 April 2003/ Accepted 22 October 2003
However, nutrient exchange between the plant cytosol and the bacteroid may be more complex than previously thought . A model in which amino acid cycling is essential to drive nitrogen fixation in pea nodules has been proposed recently (19) . The importance of amino acid cycling was first revealed because mutation of the two broad-specificity amino acid uptake systems (Aap and Bra) of Rhizobium leguminosarum causes plants to become severely nitrogen starved, even though bacteroids retain the ability to reduce 15N2 to ammonium (19) . In this model, a dicarboxylate and an amino acid such as glutamate need to be taken up by the bacteroid to drive both dicarboxylate oxidation and the secretion of amino acids such as aspartate and alanine . The role of glutamate is to act as the amino group donor for the transamination of oxaloacetate to aspartate and possibly for that of pyruvate to alanine . Disruption of aspartate aminotransferase in alfalfa or pea bacteroids prevents N2 reduction, which is consistent with a central role for transamination (19, 37) . Bacteroids with amino acid uptake mutations also become carbon saturated, probably because they become inefficient at using dicarboxylic acids, which instead accumulate as polyhydroxybutyrate (19) . Given the proposed importance of amino acid cycling, it is crucial to appreciate the difference between de novo amino acid synthesis by AldA, which results in ammonium assimilation, and amino acid synthesis by transamination . However, it is apparent that de novo amino acid synthesis by AldA could have a significant impact on any transamination cycle, because it would alter the steady-state levels of keto and amino acids . AldA catalyzes the reversible NADH-dependent synthesis of alanine from NH4+ and pyruvate . Rhizobial AldAs have lower Kms for ammonia (5 to 9 mM) than is common for most bacterial enzymes (20 to 300 mM), consistent with a greater-than-usual ability to assimilate ammonia (1, 32) . The aldA gene was identified in R . leguminosarum because, when present in multiple copies, it suppressed a dadR mutant, which does not grow on alanine as the sole source of carbon (1) . Thus, while AldA enables alanine catabolism when overexpressed, this does not appear to be its normal role . In agreement with this notion, the dad operon, which consists of three genes (dadR, dadX, and dadA), is present in a wide range of bacteria, where it is the primary pathway for alanine degradation (22, 39) . In addition, an aldA mutant grew as well as the wild type on alanine as the sole carbon source, confirming that AldA is not the principal catabolic enzyme in R . leguminosarum (1) . In spite of the controversy over the possible importance of ammonium assimilation via alanine synthesis by AldA in bacteroids involved in Rhizobium-legume symbioses, we know very little about what regulates aldA expression . Furthermore, given that AldA may alter the availability of keto and amino acids for amino acid cycling by transamination, we investigated the physiological basis of the regulation of aldA and how it relates to the function of aldA in nodules .
To complement aldA mutant RU1327, aldA was PCR amplified by using primers P199 (5' ATACAAAGAAGGCGGCATCC 3') and P200 (5' AGCTCGGCGTTGGTGATGC 3') and was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (pRU640) . aldA was transferred as a 1.45-kb SacI/KpnI fragment into the stable plasmid pTR101 (38), producing pRU708 . To mutate aldR, a 3.1-kb SalI fragment carrying aldA and
aldR was cloned from cosmid pRU3135 into pBluescript SK(-)
(pRU693) . aldR was disrupted with a spectinomycin resistance
cassette cloned from pHP45 Primers P280 (TTTTTTGGTACCATACAAAGAAGGCGGCATCCCCTC) and P281 (TTTTTTGAGCTCCGTCCTCTGCGCGTCTGAAAAGAC) were used to amplify aldA and aldR, which was cloned as an SstI/KpnI fragment into pTR101, creating pRU889 . Construction of transcriptional fusions to gusA. To construct plasmid-based fusions, the aldA-aldR intergenic region was amplified using primers P219 (GAGCGCCTTGTGTGAAAGCC) and P220 (TCCGGCGCCAGATGCAGATAG) and was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (pRU679) . To construct a gusA fusion to aldR, the region was subcloned into pJP2 (26) as a HindIII/XbaI fragment (pRU730) . To construct a gusA fusion to aldA, the region was transferred to pSK(-) as an EcoRI fragment (pRU701) in order to switch the orientation of the aldR-aldA promoter region . The region was subcloned into pJP2 as a HindIII/XbaI fragment (pRU731) . To construct chromosomal fusions, a gusA integration vector was made by cloning gusA from pJP2 into pK19mob (30) as a KpnI/PstI fragment, producing pRU877 . The ald-aldR intergenic region was amplified using primers P287 (AGCGTCTTGGCGAACTGGC) and P289 (CTGGATGCTGGAATAACGGG) and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (pRU876) . The intergenic region was cloned in both orientations into the EcoRI site of pRU877, producing pRU882 (aldR-gusA) and pRU883 (aldA-gusA) . Plasmids were conjugated into strain 3841, and recombinants were isolated by selecting for neomycin resistance . RNA extraction and Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was isolated from strain 3841, which had been grown in 50 ml of AMS to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5, by using the RNeasy Midi kit (Qaigen) and following the protocol for bacteria . The lysis step was modified by incubating cells in 10 mM Tris (pH 8) with 20% sucrose and 1 mg of lysozyme/ml at room temperature for 15 min, followed by a further 20-min incubation with EDTA at 1 mM . Standard protocols were used for RNA blotting and hybridization (29) . The DNA probe (a 1.46-kb EcoRI fragment from plasmid pRU640 which carries a full-length copy of aldA) was labeled with [32P]dCTP by using Ready To Go DNA labeling beads and was purified using ProbeQuant G-50 Micro Columns, according to the manufacturer's protocols (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) . After hybridization, the membrane was exposed to a Phosphor Screen for approximately 48 h . The screen was scanned by using a phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager TMSI) and was analyzed by ImageQuant (version 5.1) software . Assay of enzyme activity. Laboratory cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in 400 ml of AMS, with the appropriate carbon and nitrogen sources, and were harvested by centrifugation . For assays with bacteroids, nodules were picked from the pea roots and crushed in isolation buffer (100 mM phosphate [pH 7.4], 300 mM sucrose, 2 mM MgCl2) . The liberated bacteroids were purified on a prepared Percoll gradient (centrifuged for 45 min at a relative centrifugal force [RCF] of 36,900 with 55% Percoll in isolation buffer) and subjected to centrifugation (15 min at an RCF of 36,900) . The bacteroid fraction was carefully isolated, then centrifuged (10 min at an RCF of 3,345), and resuspended twice to remove Percoll . To prepare enzyme extracts, either free-living cells or bacteroids were centrifuged (10 min at an RCF of 3,345) at 4°C, and pellets were washed twice by repeated centrifugation in cold 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and were then resuspended in 10 ml of ice-cold 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) with 2 mM dithiothreitol and 20% glycerol . Cells were lysed by using a French pressure cell (SLM Instruments Inc.) at 69 MPa . Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at an RCF of 28,000 and 4°C for 30 min . L-Alanine dehydrogenase activity was assayed at 28°C by measuring the change in absorbance at 340 nm due to oxidation of NADH . Substrate concentrations were 0.2 mM NADH, 5 mM pyruvate, and 100 mM NH4Cl in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) . Activities were calculated from the initial linear rates (NADH extinction coefficient = 6.22 x 103 liters mol-1 cm-1) . KCN (10 mM) was also added to the reaction mixtures to inhibit a high background of NADH oxidase activity . ß-Glucuronidase (GusA) activity was measured as previously described for ß-galactosidase reactions (24), except that 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-ß-D-glucuronide was substituted as the chromogenic substrate . Protein concentrations of enzyme extracts were determined by the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as a standard (5) . Intracellular alanine determination. Cultures (500 ml) of various strains of R . leguminosarum were grown to mid-log phrase (approximately 5 x 108 CFU ml-1) on AMS with either glucose or succinate as the carbon source and NH4Cl as the nitrogen source . Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at room temperature for 10 min at an RCF of 6,819 . The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen . Frozen pellets were then resuspended in 5 ml of HEPES (250 mM; pH 8.7) and placed in a boiling water bath for 5 min . Disrupted cells were removed by centrifugation at an RCF of 26,200 for 30 min, and the supernatant was removed for alanine determination by the coupled alanine dehydrogenase assay as previously described (1) . To ensure that the boiling step did not degrade alanine, internal standards of alanine were added to appropriate samples . French press extracts did not increase the release of alanine . The intracellular concentration of alanine was determined from the known intracellular volume of R . leguminosarum strain 3841 (1.45 ml g-1 [dry weight]) (10) . Plant growth. Rhizobium leguminosarum bv . viciae strains were used to inoculate surface-sterilized pea seeds (Pisum sativum cv . Avola) at the time of sowing . Plants were grown in a greenhouse in pots (10 liters) filled with a sterile sand-gravel-vermiculite mixture, watered with a nitrogen-free nutrient solution (24), and harvested at 4 weeks for enzyme assay and acetylene reduction and at 6 weeks for dry weight analysis . Acetylene reduction was performed as previously described (1) . Nodule sections and staining. Nodules were picked from roots and sectioned in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer by using a vibratom (Leica VT 1000S) . Sections were stained in 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-glucuronide (0.2 mg/ml in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 2 mM ferricyanide, 2 mM ferrocyanide, and 0.1% Triton X-100) as described by Boesten et al . (4) . Sections were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer-0.1% Triton X-100) for 30 min and visualized by microscopy . Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence of R . leguminosarum aldR has been deposited in EMBL under accession number aj238118 .
The AldR sequence from R . leguminosarum enabled the identification by BLAST analysis of other rhizobial aldR genes divergent from aldA . Sinorhizobium meliloti, Mesorhizobium loti, and Bradyrhizobium japonicum have proteins with 81% (SMc01168_AA at http://sequence.toulouse.inra.fr/meliloti.html), 72% (mlr0363 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/), and 48% (bll3178 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/) amino acid identity to R . leguminosarum AldR, respectively, over their entire lengths (12, 16) . S . meliloti, like R . leguminosarum, has one chromosomal copy of aldA and a divergent aldR . However, M . loti has two putative copies of aldA, one divergent from aldR on the chromosome (mll0362 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/) and a second (pmll9089 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/) on plasmid pMLa, not associated with a regulator . Likewise, B . japonicum has a single isolated copy of aldA (blr1738 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/) on the symbiotic island (14) and a second copy of aldA (blr3179 at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/rhizobase/), divergent from a putative aldR . R . leguminosarum AldA has 85% amino acid identity to its S . meliloti homologue, 84% amino acid identity to both proteins in M . loti, and 69 and 72% identities to the symbiotic island and aldR-associated copies of aldA in B . japonicum, respectively, over their entire lengths (12, 16) . The presence of two copies of aldA in M . loti and B . japonicum, both of which form determinate nodules, contrasts dramatically with the situation in R . leguminosarum and S . meliloti, which form indeterminate nodules . The absolute AldA enzyme activity in R . leguminosarum is approximately an order of magnitude lower in both free-living cultures and bacteroids than that in B . japonicum, consistent with the presence of multiple copies of aldA in B . japonicum (1, 33) . The specific importance of AldA in rhizobia is highlighted by the absence of aldA in both Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Brucella melitensis, even though these organisms are closely related to the rhizobia (9, 13) . Mutation of aldR. To investigate the role of AldR in
the regulation of aldA, an aldR mutant (RU1422) was
isolated by cloning an
Transcriptional regulation of aldA and aldR was investigated by cloning a 641-bp PCR product in both orientations in the stable broad-host-range gusA transcriptional vector pJP2 . The vector alone had no detectable GusA activity in strain 3841, but with either an aldA (pRU731) or an aldR (pRU730) fusion, there was considerable activity on a variety of carbon sources (Table 3) . Both aldA::gusA and aldR::gusA fusions were induced approximately twofold on succinate- compared to glucose-grown cells . Growth of strain 3841 on alanine resulted in a sevenfold induction of gusA transcription, consistent with the induction of AldA enzyme activity (Table 2) . When either the aldA::gusA or aldR::gusA fusions were measured in the aldR mutant, RU1422, there was no detectable activity on a wide variety of carbon sources (Table 3) . Thus, aldR regulates both itself (auotoregulatory) and aldA . The autoregulation of aldR, in conjunction with variations in plasmid copy number, may explain the large errors in GusA activity for both aldA and aldR fusions (Table 3) . Of 15 independent cultures of each strain assayed, it was common to obtain either high induction or no induction at all for both aldA::gusA and aldR::gusA . This effect is expected if the plasmid containing the ald fusions titrates out the positive transcriptional regulator AldR . Minor changes in the plasmid copy number will have a large effect on the concentration of available AldR . It should be noted that the plasmid fusions do not contain a full-length copy of aldR . Cultures containing either aldA::gusA or aldR::gusA that failed to induce GusA activity after growth on succinate-ammonium also failed to show detectable AldA enzyme activity .
Total RNA was extracted from cultures of strain 3841 grown in minimal medium containing either glucose, succinate, glucose-alanine, or 20 mM alanine as the carbon source(s) . The isolated RNA was probed with a 1.46-kb EcoRI fragment from plasmid pRU640, which carries a full-length copy of aldA . The aldA transcript was between 1.1 and 1.2 kb, consistent with the length of the aldA gene (1,133 bp) . Quantitation with a phosphorimager showed that there was a 2.1-fold induction of aldA mRNA levels on succinate, a 2.0-fold induction on alanine-glucose, and a 3.8-fold induction on 20 mM alanine, with respect to cells grown on glucose . These results were consistent over three independent RNA extractions, blotting, and hybridizations and are reasonably consistent with both enzyme activity and gusA fusion results . The presence of a good hybridization signal for cultures grown on glucose-ammonium, measured with a phosphorimager (data not shown), confirms the GusA transcriptional data indicating that aldA is transcribed in cultures grown on glucose-ammonium (Table 3) . This is true even though AldA enzyme activity was not detected . The absence of detectable enzyme activity is likely to be due to the insensitivity of NADH-linked enzyme assays, particularly in crude extracts where there is high background NADH oxidase activity . In planta expression. Strain 3841 containing the aldA::gusA or aldR::gusA fusion was inoculated onto plants, and 3-week-old nodules were removed, sectioned, and stained for GusA . The staining shows that GusA is active in the II/III interzone, where bacteroid maturation is occurring, as well as in zone III, which contains the mature nitrogen-fixing bacteroids (Fig . 1) .
Four-week-old pea plants inoculated with strain 3841/pTR101 or 3841/pRU889 reduced acetylene at 4.55 µmol h-1 plant-1 (standard error of the mean [SEM], ±0.53 µmol h-1 plant-1; n = 8) or 5.9 µmol h-1 plant-1 (SEM, ±0.38 µmol h-1 plant-1; n = 8), respectively . These results are not significantly different (P > 0.05), indicating that there is no change in the ability of 3841/pRU889 to reduce N2 . However, the dry weights of 6-week-old pea plants inoculated with 3841/pTR101 or 3841/pRU889 were 1.51 g (SEM, ±0.16; n = 11) or 1.08 g (SEM, ±0.09; n = 11), respectively . These differences are highly significant (P = 0.00021) . Thus, while the overall capacity of strain 3841/pRU889 to reduce N2 is unimpaired, overexpression of aldA dramatically reduces plant growth . This suggests that increasing the de novo synthesis of alanine from pyruvate and ammonium in bacteroids reduces the ability of the bacteroid to donate fixed nitrogen to the plant . Intracellular concentration of alanine. Since aldA is induced by both organic acids and alanine, and the reaction it catalyzes is reversible, it is difficult to predict whether AldA contributes to net alanine synthesis or degradation in vivo . It is also possible that alanine might be the true intracellular inducer of aldA, because cultures grown on it are more highly induced than those grown on organic acids (Tables 2 and 3) . One way to investigate these questions is to measure the effect of expression of aldA on the intracellular concentration of alanine . Surprisingly, alanine concentrations were higher in glucose-grown than in succinate-grown cultures, in spite of the absence of detectable AldA enzyme activity in the former (Table 4) . This finding rules out the possibility that organic acids induce aldA by elevating intracellular alanine concentrations . Alanine concentrations were much lower in cells of strain RU1327 (aldA) grown on succinate (74% lower) or glucose (34% lower) than in the wild type . The reduction in alanine concentrations in RU1327 relative to those in the wild type, when cells were grown on glucose, is consistent with the observation that aldA is transcribed (Table 3 and Northern blot analysis results [data not shown]) . This suggests that AldA is present, although we could not detect it in an enzyme assay by measuring the comparatively insensitive oxidation of NADH . The higher concentration of alanine in glucose-grown cultures is likely to reflect many factors, including the concentrations of keto acids such as pyruvate, the ammonium concentration, and the redox state of the cells . It is also dependent on the transamination activity of the cultures . Clearly, AldA is only one factor regulating intracellular alanine concentrations . When aldA was overexpressed, there was a large increase in alanine concentrations, particularly in glucose-grown cells (Table 4) . This finding suggests that cells grown on glucose, relative to growth on succinate, are particularly sensitive to the level of AldA, and as suggested above, this sensitivity may be due to the concentration of keto acids or the redox potential . It is noteworthy that AldA enzyme activity was detectable in glucose-grown cells in which AldA was overexpressed (Table 2) . The drop in intracellular alanine concentrations when aldA was mutated and the increase when aldA was overexpressed are consistent with AldA being responsible for net alanine synthesis .
AldR was shown to positively regulate the induction of aldA and to autoregulate its own induction (Table 3) . The autoregulation was discovered because aldR::gusA fusions were inactive in an aldR mutant . However, plasmids containing the aldA-aldR intergenic region also had a tendency to inactivate both aldA and aldR expression . Cultures containing aldA::gusA or aldR::gusA plasmid fusions, but which lacked GusA activity after growth under inducing conditions, also had no AldA enzyme activity . This is most likely due to the binding of AldR to the aldA-aldR intergenic regions of plasmids, preventing binding to the chromosomal region . Binding of AldR to the reporter plasmids would be abortive, since a full-length aldR gene is not present . The regulation of aldA and aldR by an autoregulatory mechanism is typical of the AsnC/Lrp class of regulators, which has been elucidated in great detail for other systems (20, 21) . The important questions for rhizobial AldA expression are not so much those about the mechanistic details of AsnC regulation, but rather those about what the regulation means for nitrogen fixation in legume nodules . Both aldR and aldA were expressed in the II/III interzone and in zone III of pea nodules, confirming widespread expression in the nodule (Fig . 1) . However, a key difference between soybean and pea bacteroids is the relative expression levels, which are around 0.3 to 1 versus 0.08 µmol min-1 mg of protein-1, respectively (1, 36) . Some of the differences between the reported behaviors of soybean and pea bacteroids in alanine secretion may therefore relate to AldA activity . To test this hypothesis, AldA activity was increased by expression of aldA on a stable multicopy plasmid (Table 2) . The effect was to dramatically lower the symbiotic performance of pea plants, as measured by dry weight . However, the total nitrogenase activity, as measured by acetylene reduction, was unaltered . The normal activity of nitrogenase suggests that the negative impact of aldA overexpression on plant growth is unlikely to be due to aldA being generally deleterious to bacteroids . Instead, artificially altering de novo alanine synthesis appears to perturb the acquisition of nitrogen by the plant . Perhaps locking up too much of the ammonium fixed by bacteroids, as alanine does, may be detrimental to nitrogen transfer to the plant . Elevating the de novo synthesis of glutamate in bean bacteroids by overexpression of glutamate dehydrogenase also lowers symbiotic performance (23) . In light of the recent proposal that amino acid cycling is essential to nitrogen fixation in pea nodules, the results presented here are highly significant . It was proposed that amino acid cycling is driven by transamination and not by de novo amino acid synthesis, as catalyzed by AldA (19) . Amino acid cycling requires ammonium and an amino acid to be secreted to the plant . However, it is apparent that de novo amino acid synthesis by AldA will alter the balance of ammonium, pyruvate, and alanine and that overexpression of aldA may perturb amino acid cycling . Overall, the role of AldA in peas seems consistent with balancing organic acid, ammonium, and amino acid levels in the cell but not with alanine being synthesized as the sole secretion product of N2 reduction by pea bacteroids . The levels of pyruvate and alanine are crucial to the function of malic enzyme and pyruvate dehydrogenase, both of which are essential for functioning of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and nitrogen fixation (7, 11) . Our study showing that aldA mutants can still fix nitrogen is also in accord with this conclusion (1) . However, the absence of a strong symbiotic phenotype in an aldA mutant could mean that there is a totally plastic partitioning between alanine and ammonium . Thus, alanine could still be the principal nitrogen secretion product in planta, but ammonium could replace it if alanine synthesis were prevented . The data in this paper make this possibility very unlikely, since moderate overexpression of aldA in the bacteroid is harmful to nitrogen acquisition by the plant . Finally, the complex induction of aldA, in cells grown either on organic acids or on alanine, suggests that it may have a subtle role in balancing their intracellular levels .
What Is MIC?,
What Is Staphylococcus Aureus?,
What Is Listeria Monocytogenes?,
What Is Botulism?,
What is Food Microbiology?,
r,
Bacteriology,
r,
Bacteria,
i,
Microorganism,
i,
Bacterium,
s,
Microbes,
c,
Cell suspensions,
a,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Microorganisms,
i,
S. cerevisiae,
s,
Streptococcal,
o,
Haemophilus,
s,
Enterobacters,
a,
Proteus,
e,
Streptococcal,
o,
Candida albicans,
i,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Microorganisms,
c,
Gram positive,
r,
Yeasts,
n,
Multidrug resistant,
e,
Microorganism,
i,
Microbial,
i,
Campylobacter,
a,
Enterobacteriacea,
r,
Bacteriological,
i,
Campylobacter
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||