|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2003, p . 1326-1337, Vol . 185, No . 4 Effects of the Chromosome Partitioning Protein Spo0J (ParB) on oriC Positioning and Replication Initiation in Bacillus subtilis
Philina S . Lee,1 Daniel Chi-Hong Lin,1, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139,1 Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma Nara 630-0101, Japan2 Received 3 October 2002/ Accepted 26 November 2002
Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB) belong to the well-conserved Par family of partitioning proteins . Members of this family are involved in both plasmid and chromosome segregation . When placed on a plasmid, the chromosomal systems can stabilize the plasmid (15, 37, 62) . Our understanding of this system comes largely from studies of partitioning of the low-copy P1 prophage and F plasmid of Escherichia coli: ParA is an ATPase, and ParB is a DNA-binding protein that interacts with ParA and parS, the binding site for ParB (references 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 17, and 21 and references therein) . One model for the function of the Par system proposes that Par proteins recruit parS-containing DNA to specific intracellular locations . This model is supported by the observations that a variety of plasmids are positioned at the cell quarters (3, 10, 16, 22, 29, 44, 46, 48) and that the cognate Par system is required for this localization (3, 10, 29, 44) . Par systems are required for stable inheritance of these plasmids (reviewed in references 2, 8, 17, and 21), leading to the suggestion that positioning at the cell quarters is important for plasmid segregation (10, 16, 29, 44) . In further support of the model that Par systems are involved in positioning, inserting a sopC site in an oriC plasmid (that is otherwise not positioned at the cell quarters) is sufficient to cause positioning of this plasmid at the cell quarters in the presence of SopA and SopB (46) . Remarkably, insertion of chromosomally encoded soj, spo0J, and parS from B . subtilis into a plasmid in E . coli causes positioning of sister copies of the plasmid at the cell quarters (62) .
We were interested in determining whether Spo0J contributes positional information to the chromosomal origin region in B . subtilis . Spo0J binds at least eight parS sites located within the origin-proximal 20% of the chromosome, spread over a distance of
Spo0J is thought to contribute to chromosome orientation in sporulating cells (51) . Early during sporulation, replicated origins become positioned at the extreme poles of the cell (14, 18, 38, 51, 56) . Cell division occurs very close to one of the poles, producing a forespore and a larger mother cell . The polar septum closes around the nucleoid so that the origin-proximal 30% of a chromosome becomes trapped in the forespore (58) . The remainder of that chromosome is pumped from the mother cell into the forespore by SpoIIIE, a DNA translocase located in the septum (59, 61) . There is some disagreement over the contribution (or lack thereof) of spo0J to faithful origin trapping in the forespore (12, 51) . Furthermore, inactivation of spo0J appears to cause increased chromosomal copy numbers in cells that have been induced to sporulate, suggesting that trapping of genes outside the origin-proximal 30% of the chromosome could be due to random trapping of regions from extra chromosomes rather than a direct involvement of spo0J in establishing chromosome orientation (56) . To examine the contributions of Spo0J to origin positioning, we measured origin position in wild-type and spo0J mutant cells during vegetative growth and sporulation . Our results indicate that Spo0J contributes to the normal positioning of sister origins at the cell quarters during vegetative growth . In addition, Spo0J appeared to affect chromosome positioning during sporulation, but probably indirectly . We also found that the subcellular position of Spo0J was dependent on the chromosomal location of its binding sites . That is, an array of parS sites inserted at various locations in the chromosome, in the absence of six of the eight known binding sites, recruited Spo0J away from the cell quarters . Finally, we found that spo0J mutant cells were longer than wild-type cells and had an increased DNA content, most likely due to increased and asynchronous initiation of DNA replication .
Strains, alleles, and plasmids. B . subtilis strains used in this study are listed in Table 1 . Most are derivatives of AG174 (JH642) and contain the trpC and pheA mutations, unless indicated otherwise . Standard procedures were used for strain constructions (20) .
(ii)
(iii) lac operator system. LacI-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and LacI-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) fusions were used to visualize regions of the chromosome marked with arrays of lac operators . The lacI-gfp and lacI-cfp fusions are driven by a constitutive promoter, are integrated into thrC, and have been described in detail (31, 32) . Briefly, lacI is missing the C-terminal 11 codons (to inhibit tetramerization) and is fused to either gfpmut2 (lacI-gfp) or cfpw7 (lacI-cfp) .
The lacO cassette was inserted into several regions of the chromosome (90°, 181°, 270°, and 359°) by homologous recombination . To insert the lacO cassette into the 359° region of the chromosome, oligonucleotides LIN-145 and LIN-146 were used to amplify a
(iv) parS arrays. pDL139 contains 16 tandemly repeated parS sites (parS16) and was used as the parent plasmid for targeting the parS array into various chromosomal sites . It was constructed by a strategy similar to that used to construct the lacO cassette (49), taking advantage of the compatible cohesive ends of SalI and XhoI and loss of both sites upon ligation . First, a plasmid (pDL135) was constructed with an approximately 60-bp fragment from spo0J that contains the 16-bp parS site internal to spo0J . Single-stranded oligonucleotides LIN116 (65 nucleotides) and LIN117 (61 nucleotides) were annealed, giving a double-stranded oligonucleotide with a single parS site approximately in the middle, one blunt end with an XhoI site, and a SalI overhang at the other end . This largely double-stranded oligonucleotide was ligated into pGEMcat (20) that had been digested with SmaI and SalI to generate pDL135 . An EcoRI-SalI fragment from this plasmid was then cloned back into pDL135 that had been digested with EcoRI and XhoI, generating pDL136, containing two parS sites . This cycle was repeated three more times, each time with the new plasmid as the source of the insert (EcoRI to SalI) and vector (cloning between EcoRI and XhoI) to generate pDL137 (four parS sites), pDL138 (eight parS sites), and finally pDL139 (parS16) . The parS16 array was able to stabilize an otherwise unstable low-copy plasmid (data not shown) to an extent indistinguishable from that previously determined for a single parS site (37), and plasmid stability was dependent on both soj and spo0J (data not shown) . The parS16 array was targeted to specific chromosomal sites by cloning fragments from the location of interest into a plasmid that had the parS16 array . Plasmids were then integrated into the chromosome by single-crossover homologous recombination into the targeted location . The positions targeted were identical to or within few hundred base pairs of the regions in which the lac operator arrays had been inserted . For the terminus region, the parS16 array was targeted downstream of cgeD at 181° with pDL141, a derivative of pET21(+) (Novagen), which contains a selectable marker for B . subtilis (cat), a fragment from cgeD, and the parS16 array . The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene was excised from pMI1101 (63) and inserted into the SphI site of pET21(+), generating pET21cat . An approximately 490-bp fragment from cgeD was amplified by PCR (with oligonucleotides LIN118 and LIN119, containing AatII sites) and cloned into the AatII site of pET21cat, generating pDL124 . The parS16 array was excised from pDL139 by digestion with EcoRI and HindIII and ligated into EcoRI- and HindIII-digested pDL124 to create plasmid pDL141 . Derivatives of pDL139 were made to target the parS16 array to 90° (pPSL2A), 210° (pPSL3A), and 270° (pPSL1A) . In each case, a fragment of chromosomal DNA was amplified by PCR with primers containing EcoRI sites near the ends and cloned into the EcoRI site of pDL139 . pPSL1A (parS16 array at 270°) contains a 994-bp fragment from the 3' end of cotS, generated by PCR with primers LEE-8 and LEE-9 . pPSL2A (parS16 array at 90°) contains a 673-bp fragment from the 3' end of yheH, generated by PCR with primers LEE-10 and LEE-11 . pPSL3A (parS16 array at 210°) contains a 510-bp fragment from the 3' end of yqkF, generated by PCR with primers LEE-12 and LEE-13 .
(v)
Fluorescence microscopy. Where indicated, cells were stained with the vital dye FM4-64 (200 ng/ml; Molecular Probes) to visualize membranes and 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (40 to 80 ng/ml) to visualize nucleoids . Microscopy was performed essentially as described previously (30, 31) . Briefly, cells were immobilized on pads of 1% agarose in 1x T'base-1 mM MgSO4 (20), and images were captured with a Nikon E800 microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu digital camera and filters tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate for FM4-64 and the chroma filter set at 31044 for CFP and 41012 for GFP . Improvision OpenLabs 2.0 software was used to process images . Measurement of focus position in cells with two foci. Focus positions in cells with two foci were measured with a strategy designed to eliminate any unintentional visual bias in scoring . For each cell, the focus closest to a pole was designated focus A, and the other focus was designated focus B . Three measurements were made: (i) a, the distance from the center of focus A to the closest pole; (ii) b, the distance from that same pole to the center of focus B; and (iii) l, the cell length . This created a systematic bias in scoring so that in every cell, focus A was closer to a pole than focus B . In order to remove this bias, a random number generator was used to assign each focus an approximately 50% chance of being counted as closest to a pole . The corresponding distance of each focus from the same cell pole (the a and b measurements) was then recalculated . The focus position as a percentage of cell length was determined with the measurements described above . We determined the distance of each focus from the nearest cell pole (a for focus A; l minus b for focus B), divided by cell length, and multiplied by 100 to give the focus position as a percentage of cell length . These numbers were averaged for all the cells in a sample . The 95% confidence intervals for the mean were calculated with the approximation that, for large samples (n > 30), which cannot be assumed to be normally distributed, the 95% confidence interval is approximately equal to the sample mean ± 1.96 times the standard error of the mean (23) . This is an indication of confidence in the mean and not an indication of the breadth of the distribution . Interfocal distance was calculated by subtracting a from b . The correlation coefficient between cell length and interfocal distance was calculated with the least-squares method of linear regression (23) . Flow cytometry. Cells were grown at 30°C in antibiotic medium 3 (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with adenine and guanosine (both at 20 µg/ml) . Flow cytometry was performed essentially as described previously (47) . Briefly, chloramphenicol (200 µg/ml) was added to cells to inhibit protein synthesis and block initiation of new rounds of replication . Cells were incubated for 5 h to allow ongoing rounds of replication to finish . Next, cells were collected, fixed with ethanol, and treated with a mixture of fluorescent dyes, mithramycin A, and ethidium bromide . The amount of DNA per cell was measured with a Bryte HS flow cytometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) . Measurement of DNA-protein ratios. The DNA-protein ratio was determined essentially as described previously (27) . Briefly, 30 ml of exponentially growing cells was collected by centrifugation, resuspended, lysed, and separated into nucleic acid and protein fractions . DNA and protein concentrations in the fractions were measured with colorimetric methods as described before (6, 39) . Reported values are averages from three to four experiments, followed by the standard deviations from the mean .
The interfocal distance was not as tightly correlated with cell length in the spo0J mutant (Fig . 3C) as in wild-type cells (Fig . 3B) . A subset of spo0J null cells had replicated origins that were closer together than origins in wild-type cells of similar lengths . The smaller interfocal distance in this subset of cells probably accounts for the smaller average interfocal distance in the spo0J mutant . The subset of cells having aberrantly closely spaced origins was approximately 15% of the spo0J null cells, estimated from the number of cells falling below the wild-type distribution (Fig . 3B, C) . This is greater than the proportion (1 to 2%) of anucleate cells produced by a spo0J null mutant, indicating that most of the cells with mispositioned origin regions can still successfully partition sister chromosomes . In fact, the vast majority of spo0J mutant cells still manage to separate sister origins to opposite halves of the cell (Fig . 2C) . Following duplication, origin regions move toward opposite halves of the cell in both B . subtilis and E . coli (14, 16, 33, 37, 38, 45, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56) . Our data indicate that in B . subtilis, the sister origin regions are then positioned at or near the cell quarters . The defect in positioning in the spo0J null mutant could reflect a defect in: (i) recruiting the origins to the quarters, (ii) separating newly duplicated sister origins, or (iii) maintaining origin regions at the cell quarters after they are initially positioned there . These possibilities are not mutually exclusive . Results presented below indicate that Spo0J is not sufficient to recruit chromosomal binding sites to the cell quarters, leading us to favor a role for Spo0J in separation of sister origin regions or in maintenance of sister origins at the cell quarters . parS arrays at 90°, 181°, 210°, and 270° are not recruited to the cell quarters. A simple model for the function of ParB proteins is that they recruit their cognate binding sites to a characteristic subcellular position (29) . This model can account for many observations regarding the plasmid Par systems and the fact that chromosomal systems can function to stabilize a plasmid (15, 37, 62) and position plasmids at the cell quarters (62) . In this view, Spo0J could be positioned at the cell quarters and recruit or tether its binding sites there . To test this model, we measured the subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP bound to an array of 16 parS sites (parS16) inserted into different regions of the chromosome (90°, 181°, 210°, and 270°) in cells with six of the eight known endogenous parS sites inactivated (Fig . 1B) (37) . In cells with the parS16 array inserted in the 270° region of the chromosome, the subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP was different from that of the origin region (Fig . 2A, B, and J; Table 3) . Spo0J-GFP foci in cells with the parS16 array at the 270° region showed a broader distribution than origin foci and were positioned 33.5% ± 1.6% of cell length from the nearest pole (Table 3) . The results indicate that Spo0J is not sufficient to recruit parS sites at the 270° region to the cell quarters . We also measured the position of Spo0J-GFP bound to ectopic parS sites inserted at three other regions in the chromosome, 90°, 181°, and 210° (Fig . 1B) . None of these regions were recruited to the cell quarters (Fig . 2D, G, and F; Table 3), and in each case, the subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP was statistically distinguishable from that of the origin at the cell quarters . Again, these results indicate that Spo0J is not sufficient to recruit its binding sites to the cell quarters . Subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP bound to parS16 arrays at 90° and 270° is a reflection of the normal position of each chromosomal region. For the 270°, 90°, and 181° regions, we compared the positioning of Spo0J-GFP bound to the parS16 array to that of the normal position of these regions as visualized with LacI-CFP bound to an array of lac operators inserted at the same chromosomal region (see Materials and Methods) . The subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP bound to parS sites at 90° and 270° appeared to be a reflection of the normal subcellular position of those regions . The average position of LacI-CFP bound to an array of lac operators inserted at 90° was 34.9% ± 1.9% of cell length (Fig . 2E; Table 3) . This was statistically indistinguishable from the average position of Spo0J-GFP bound to the parS16 array inserted at 90° (Fig . 2D; Table 3) . Similarly, the average position of LacI-CFP bound to an array of lac operators at 270° was 32.6% ± 1.3% of cell length (Fig . 2K; Table 3), statistically indistinguishable from the average position of Spo0J-GFP bound to the parS16 array at 270° (Fig . 2J; Table 3) . These results indicate that not only is Spo0J insufficient to recruit its binding sites to the cell quarters, but that the subcellular position of Spo0J is largely determined by the subcellular position of its binding sites, at least for the 90° and 270° regions . In contrast to our findings with the 90° and 270° regions, the subcellular position of Spo0J-GFP bound to the parS array at 181° was significantly different from the subcellular position of LacI-CFP bound to lac operators at that position . In cells with two foci, the foci of Spo0J-GFP bound to the parS16 array inserted at 181° were farther apart than those of LacI-CFP bound to lac operators inserted at the same position (Fig . 2G, H; Table 3) . The average focus positions were 31.5% ± 1.5% versus 38.6% ± 1.4% of cell length for Spo0J-GFP and LacI-CFP, respectively . We also measured the position of the terminus region with a fusion of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) to the replication termination protein Rtp . Rtp binds to multiple sites in the terminus region (34, 35) and has been used to visualize the subcellular position of this region (32) . We found that the subcellular position of Rtp-YFP was similar to that determined for the 181° region determined with the lac system (Fig . 2H, I; Table 3), consistent with previous findings (32) . These results indicate that the position of the terminus region is perturbed in cells with Spo0J bound to an array of parS sites at 181° . The terminus and origin regions are different from other regions of the chromosome in that they both appear to interact, either directly or indirectly, with factors associated with the bacterial membrane (11, 24, 57, 59) . It is possible that Spo0J bound to the parS array inserted at 181° interferes with endogenous positional information or that the parS array titrates Spo0J away from other sites that affect, either directly or indirectly, the positioning of the terminus region .
Effects of spo0J on positioning various regions of the chromosome in the forespore.
During sporulation, the origin-proximal 30% of one chromosome is initially positioned in the forespore, with the remaining
These results and interpretations were called into question by a somewhat different type of analysis investigating the effects on sporulation of the transient genetic asymmetry between the forespore and the mother cell (12) . These results indicated that the 174° and 192° regions of the chromosome were not positioned in the forespore in a spo0J mutant, apparently contradicting the earlier report (51) . Finally, it has been suggested that during sporulation, some spo0J mutant cells have an increased number of chromosomes, and parts of these might be randomly trapped in the forespore and not reflect a role for Spo0J in positioning origin regions to the pole (56) . In order to measure the effects of Spo0J on positioning of the origin region in the forespore, we visualized the 359° (Fig . 4A to E) and the 181° and 270° regions of the chromosome in sporulating cells . Regions of the chromosome were visualized with LacI-GFP or LacI-CFP bound to an array of lac operators inserted in the region of interest . Deleting spo0J causes a sporulation defect that is suppressed by deleting soj (25) . Therefore, as in previous reports (12, 51, 56), comparisons were made between wild-type and soj spo0J double mutants . In addition, we used strains that contained a null mutation in spoIIIE, the gene necessary for transport of the origin-distal 70% of the chromosome into the forespore (59, 61) . A spoIIIE null mutation prevents translocation of the entire chromosome into the forespore and allows visualization of the region that is trapped . Images of live cells were captured 4 h after the induction of sporulation, and cells that had undergone polar septation were analyzed . The number of foci located in the forespore and mother cell was determined for each chromosomal region of interest (Table 4) .
There was an effect of spo0J on trapping the origin region in the forespore (Table 4), but only in cells with one focus of the origin region . Only seven sporangia (1.9% of the total) from the spo0J+ cells had a single focus of the origin region, and in five of those the focus was in the forespore . In striking contrast, 43 sporangia (12% of the total) from the soj spo0J mutant had a single focus of the origin region (Table 5) . Only seven of these had the focus in the forespore, and the remaining 36 had the focus in the mother cell (Fig . 4D) . Most of the soj-spo0J null cells that failed to trap origins still had chromosomal DNA trapped in the forespore, as visualized by DAPI staining (Fig . 4C and data not shown) . soj single mutants trapped the origin at a frequency similar to wild-type cells, indicating that the trapping defect was due to the absence of spo0J (data not shown) . These results indicate that Spo0J does influence positioning of the origin region in the forespore but probably because it affects the number of sporangia that have only a single focus of the origin region . The soj spo0J null mutant also had an increase in the number of sporangia that had more than two foci of the origin region (Table 5), although almost all of these had a focus positioned in the forespore (Fig . 4E) . These effects of spo0J on the number of origin regions per sporangium are probably due to asynchronous replication and defects in coordinating cell division with replication (see below) .
In contrast to the 270° region, only 0.25% of the soj spo0J mutant sporangia (1 of 402) had the 181° region positioned in the forespore, virtually indistinguishable from the spo0J+ sporangia (0 of 420) (Table 4) . Thus, it appears that even in the absence of spo0J, the terminus region (181°) is rarely trapped in the forespore . These findings probably explain part of the apparent discrepancy between previous reports (12, 51) . If the terminus region is not significantly positioned in the forespore in the soj spo0J mutant, then, as reported (12), experiments to measure expression in the forespore of genes in the terminus region would indicate little or no expression . spo0J null mutants have more origin foci and increased chromosomal copy number. Cells containing the spo0J null mutation had phenotypes in addition to the origin-positioning defect . Inactivating spo0J affected the number of origin foci per cell: there were fewer cells with two foci and more cells with one, three, or more foci relative to the wild type, as visualized with LacI-GFP bound to lac operators at 359° (Table 2) . Additionally, the mutant cells had more foci of the 270° and 181° regions of the chromosome, visualized by LacI-CFP bound to lac operators inserted in these regions (Table 2; Fig . 4F) . These results indicate that a subset of the spo0J mutant cells have an increase in chromosomal copy number . Similar results were observed in sporulating cells (Table 5), consistent with a previous observation (56) . The increased number of chromosomes in some cells could be due to a defect in the timing of replication initiation: if origins fired more often, this could increase the chromosomal copy number, and if origins fired asynchronously within the same cell, this could create cells with three foci of the origin region . The increase in cells with one focus of the origin could be due, in part, to asynchronous initiation (for example, a cell with three foci of the origin could divide to produce a one-focus cell and a two-focus cell) . We would also expect that the spo0J mutant would have an increase in the percentage of cells with a single focus of other regions . However, this was not the case (Table 2), indicating that the increase in the percentage of cells with a single focus of the origin region might be due to something other than or in addition to asynchronous replication . A defect in separation of sister origins could also contribute to an increase in cells that appear to have a single focus of the origin . The finding that sister origins are on average closer together in the spo0J mutant is also consistent with the notion that Spo0J is somehow facilitating separation . Flow cytometry results confirmed that inactivating spo0J caused increased chromosome content as well as asynchronous initiation of replication . Replication runoff assays were performed to count the number of origins per cell . Ongoing rounds of replication were allowed to finish, while reinitiation and cell division were inhibited . Under the growth conditions used (see Materials and Methods), the majority of wild-type cells had four origins per cell, and origin numbers reflected synchronous replication initiation in most of the population (Fig . 5A) . Inactivating spo0J caused a shift towards six to eight origins per cell (Fig . 5B), consistent with the observation that a spo0J null mutation caused increased numbers of foci per cell of several chromosomal regions visualized by the lac system . These results could be due to (i) replication initiation occurring asynchronously and at a smaller cell mass in the absence of spo0J, and/or (ii) effects of spo0J on growth rate or cell division .
In addition to the increased chromosome content in some of the spo0J mutant cells, the average length of spo0J null mutant cells, measured from micrographs of exponentially growing cells, was
Interestingly, depletion of ParB in Caulobacter crescentus causes a severe defect in cell division (41), perhaps indicating a role for many of the ParB family members in regulating cytokinesis . We suspect that the defect in cell division in the spo0J mutants could partly contribute to the increased chromosome copy number . However, this alone cannot account for the presence of cells with asynchronous numbers of origin foci or the increased origin-mass and DNA-protein ratios observed in the spo0J mutant . Taken together, the results indicate that spo0J is a negative regulator, either directly or indirectly, of replication initiation in B . subtilis . Phenotypes of spo0J mutants. Experiments presented here indicate that duplicated origin regions are typically found approximately at the cell quarters and that Spo0J contributes to this positioning . Sister origins were closer together in a subpopulation of spo0J mutant cells . However, binding of Spo0J to an array of parS sites was not sufficient to recruit these sites to the cell quarters . It seems likely that Spo0J contributes indirectly to positioning duplicated origins at the cell quarters . Rather than providing positional information per se, it is possible that Spo0J contributes to separation of sister origin regions . If Spo0J is helping to compact the origin region, as suggested previously (1, 5), then perhaps this compaction facilitates movement of the sister origin regions away from each other . Compaction could also enhance the function of other proteins that might bind to the origin region and contribute to positioning . A recent report identified a site in the origin region that appears to be the main determinant of origin positioning (27) . Whereas Spo0J does not appear to bind to this site, perhaps Spo0J bound to its sites in the origin region contributes to the function of this positioning site . A broad region of the chromosome that appears to contribute to positioning of the origin region in the forespore has also been identified (60) . However, Spo0J function appears to override the effects of this region, and the interactions between Spo0J function and this large partitioning region are not understood . In addition to the alteration in positioning of sister origin regions, a subpopulation of the spo0J null mutant cells had extra copies of the chromosome and appeared to have asynchronous replication . These phenotypes are somewhat similar to those caused by seqA mutations of E . coli (references 21 and 40 and references therein) and may indicate that binding of Spo0J to endogenous parS sites sequesters origins and prevents inappropriate initiation of replication . Apparent discrepancy between plasmid and chromosomal par systems. Our results highlight an apparent discrepancy between plasmid and chromosomal Par systems . Spo0J was not sufficient to position ectopic chromosomal parS sites at the cell quarters . However, plasmid Par proteins are required and appear to be sufficient for positioning duplicated plasmids at the cell quarters . In fact, when placed on a derivative of the E . coli F plasmid, the B . subtilis Par system (soj, spo0J, and parS) confers positional information, so that duplicated plasmids are now found predominantly at the cell quarters and the plasmid is significantly stabilized in E . coli (62) . In B . subtilis, both soj and spo0J are necessary for plasmid stability (37) . ParA/ParB/parS partitioning systems are widespread . First characterized in the low-copy plasmid F and the prophage P1, homologous systems have been found in numerous plasmids and on many bacterial chromosomes (reviewed in references 2, 8, 17, and 21) . It would be comforting to think that the mechanisms by which the plasmid and chromosomal systems contribute to partitioning are similar, and the fact that a chromosomal system can function on a plasmid is consistent with this view . However, there appear to be significant differences between the plasmid and chromosomal systems . First, as indicated above, the Par system from B . subtilis does not appear to be sufficient to provide positional information to ectopic sites in the chromosome . Furthermore, while loss of the B . subtilis Par system causes some perturbation in the positioning of sister origin regions, there still appears to be significant positioning . In addition, in the plasmid systems, and for chromosomal systems to function on a plasmid, both the parA and parB products are required (10, 37, 44) . In contrast, in B . subtilis, loss of parB has a much more severe effect on chromosome partitioning than loss of parA (25) . We do not understand the nature of these differences between plasmids and chromosomes . They could reflect differences in the mechanisms by which the Par systems function on plasmids and chromosomes . However, we think it more likely that they reflect differences between plasmids and chromosomes (size, time required for replication, proximity of parS sites to the origin) and that the biochemical functions of the homologous Par systems are quite similar . For example, if the primary positional information comes from another site and a protein that binds to that site, as appears to be the case for the chromosome (27) and could be the case for plasmids, then the Par system could facilitate function of the primary system, but not by providing positional information per se . For plasmids (and the chromosome too), the system providing positional information could be related to the origin of replication and replication initiation proteins . Further analysis of and comparisons between plasmid and chromosomal Par systems should help determine the mechanisms by which they act .
P.S.L . was supported in part by a predoctoral training grant from NIH . This work was also supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to S.M . and by Public Health Services grant GM41934 to A.D.G .
What Is Rhizobia?, What Is Yeast?, What Is Bioreactor?, What Is Bioengineering?, What Is Bioremediation?, r, Bacteria, i, Bacteriology, r, Microorganism, c, Microbes, i, Microbiology, s, Aeromonades, s, Yeasts, e, Salmonella, n, Agrobacterium, e, Gram negative, c, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n, Microbiological, i, Vibriosis, n, Pasteurella, i, Fermentations, c, Antibiotics, i, |