Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2004, p . 4444-4446, Vol . 48, No . 11

Antibiotic Susceptibility in Neonatal Invasive Isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae in a 2-Year Nationwide Surveillance Study in Germany

Kirsten Fluegge,¹ Sven Supper,¹ Anette Siedler,² and Reinhard Berner^1*

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg,¹ Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany²

Received 8 January 2004/ Returned for modification 25 May 2004/ Accepted 20 July 2004

Active surveillance for invasive GBS infections in all neonates up to the age of 3 months was performed from April 2001 through March 2003 . Monthly questionnaires were sent out by the Laboratory Sentinel Group at the Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany, to all microbiological laboratories serving pediatric hospitals throughout Germany . Laboratories were required to report any culture-positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid GBS infection in this age group and to send isolates to the central study laboratory . The overall response rate was 95% . All isolates were tested for penicillin, ampicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, and vancomycin by the Etest method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) . Erythromycin- or clindamycin-resistant isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of ermB and mefA resistance genes as previously described (3, 5, 25, 30) . Primers 5'-AACCCGAAAAATACGCAAAA-3' and 5'-ACCCGTTGACTCATTTCCAC-3' were used to detect the ermTR gene . Amplification was performed in a DNA Biometra T-Gradient thermal cycler with one cycle of denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 56°C for 90 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min . Amplification of DNA from positive controls yielded PCR products of the expected sizes (348, 206, and 152 bp for mefA, ermB, and ermTR, respectively) .

A total of 296 invasive neonatal GBS strains were collected during the 2-year period . All strains were highly susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime . Likewise, isolates were uniformly susceptible to carbapenems, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin . Although all of the strains were resistant to gentamicin, none showed high-level resistance (defined as a MIC of >256 µg/ml) (Table 1) . Thirty-two isolates were resistant to erythromycin; 17 of these were also resistant to clindamycin . The distribution of macrolide-lincosamide resistance genes according to erythromycin-clindamycin resistance phenotypes is reported in Table 2 . Consistent with other reports, methylase was the most common mechanism detected among macrolide-resistant isolates (6, 7, 8, 12) . Except for two isolates, all of the isolates with the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotype carried at least one of the erm genes . Combinations of resistance genes occurred in 37.5% (12 of 32) . One isolate carried all three resistance genes (ermB, ermTR, and mefA) .

 
Since beta-lactam antibiotics remain the first-line treatment for GBS infections (28), a major issue of surveillance is to confirm that invasive isolates in a given country are still susceptible to this class of antibiotics . Intermediate susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin is rare (1) . In the present study, which is the first to report of national data on the antimicrobial susceptibility of GBS in Germany, all of the isolates tested were highly susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime . No trend toward reduced penicillin or ampicillin susceptibility of neonatal invasive GBS isolates was observed .

To our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically test for high-level gentamicin resistance in GBS on a larger scale . High-level resistance indicates that the isolate will not be affected synergistically by the combination of penicillin and an aminoglycoside . To date, this type of resistance has been documented in only one GBS strain isolated in France in 1987 (4) . None of the strains tested in this study showed high-level resistance to gentamicin .

Some newer antibiotics were also included in this study . Linezolid is an oxazolidinone with good activity against gram-positive organisms (14, 21) . Quinupristin-dalfopristin is a recently approved streptogramin for the treatment of infections caused by resistant gram-positive bacteria . Ertapenem is a novel carbapenem reported to have activity against gram-positive bacteria similar to that of meropenem (16, 17) . Linezolid, ertapenem, and quinupristin-dalfopristin all proved to be highly active in vitro against all of the GBS isolates tested . The MICs obtained were comparable to those reported by others (20, 31) . Consequently, all of these agents appear to be promising alternatives for the treatment of GBS infections in selected cases .

Resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin emerged during the last decade in many countries . Macrolides are the recommended second-line agents for GBS prophylaxis in the case of beta-lactam allergy . In this study, 10.1 and 5.7% of the isolates tested were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, respectively . Compared to reports from other countries with erythromycin resistance rates of up to 36% and clindamycin resistance rates of up to 18%, our data show lower resistance rates (1, 8, 23) . This is of interest and compares well to data on comparably low macrolide resistance of, e.g., pneumococci or group A streptococci in Germany (24) . The present study also confirms that ermB is the predominant resistance gene in macrolide-resistant GBS isolates with the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotype, whereas the mef gene is more common among erythromycin-resistant isolates with the M phenotype . The latter genotype, however, was found at much lower frequencies compared to those reported, e.g., for group A streptococci (13) . Of the macrolide-resistant strains, 37.5% harbored combinations of resistance genes . Combinations of resistance genes have been described before only for a small percentage of isolates (6, 8) . Only one study reported resistance gene combinations in 29.2% of the isolates (2) . To our knowledge, a triple combination of ermB, ermTR, and mefA, which was found in one of our isolates, has not been described previously .

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that GBS isolated from infants in Germany with invasive infections remain uniformly susceptible to penicillin and ampicillin . Routine susceptibility testing for beta-lactams and high-level aminoglycoside resistance of GBS strains isolated in Germany appears unnecessary . The frequency of erythromycin resistance, however, has reached significant levels, while still being remarkably lower than in other parts of the world . With increasing macrolide resistance rates, prophylaxis failure is becoming more likely . Therefore, testing of susceptibility to these drugs should be performed in individual cases when considered as alternatives for prophylaxis and treatment of GBS infection or colonization . Antibiotics such as vancomycin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, or carbapenems showed good in vitro activity against GBS, but their use should be strictly limited to cases with an obvious lack of alternatives .

1. Betriu, C., M . Gomez, A . Sanchez, A . Cruceyra, J . Romero, and J . J . Picazo. 1994 . Antibiotic resistance and penicillin tolerance in clinical isolates of group B streptococci . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 38:2183-2186.
2. Betriu, C., E . Culebras, M . Gomez, I . Rodriguez-Avial, B . A . Sanchez, M . C . Agreda, and J . J . Picazo. 2003 . Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance and telithromycin susceptibility in Streptococcus agalactiae . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 47:1112-1124.
3. Bingen, E., F . Fitoussi, C . Doit, R . Cohen, A . Tanna, R . George, C . Loukil, N . Brahimi, I . Le Thomas, and D . Deforche. 2000 . Resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pyogenes in France in pediatric patients . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 44:1453-1457.
4. Buu-Hoi, A., C . Le Bouguenec, and T . Horaud. 1990 . High-level chromosomal gentamicin resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae (group B) . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 34:985-988.
5. Clancy, J., J . Petitpas, F . Dib-Hajj, W . Yuan, M . Cronan, A . V . Kamath, J . Bergeron, and J . A . Retsema. 1996 . Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a novel macrolide-resistance determinant, mefA, from Streptococcus pyogenes . Mol . Microbiol . 22:867-879.
6. Culebras, E., I . Rodriguez-Avial, C . Betriu, M . Redondo, and J . J . Picazo. 2002 . Macrolide and tetracycline resistance and molecular relationships of clinical strains of Streptococcus agalactiae . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 46:1574-1576.
7. de Azavedo, J . C., M . McGavin, C . Duncan, D . E . Low, and A . McGeer. 2001 . Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 45:3504-3508.
8. De Mouy, D., J.-D . Cavallo, R . Leclercq, R . Fabre, and the AFORCOPI-BIO Network. 2001 . Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: French multicenter study . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 45:2400-2402.
9. Deutsches Institut für Normung. 1998 . Methoden zur Empfindlichkeitsprüfung von mikrobiellen Krankheitserregern gegen Chemotherapeutika . Teil 4: Bewertungskriterien der minimalen Hemmkonzentration . Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin, Germany.
10. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2001 . Linezolid breakpoints . Clin . Microbiol . Infect . 7:283-284.
11. Fernandez, M., M . E . Hickman, and C . J . Baker. 1998 . Antimicrobial susceptibilities of group B streptococci isolated between 1992 and 1996 from patients with bacteremia or meningitis . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 42:1517-1519.
12. Fitoussi, F., C . Loukil, I . Gros, O . Clermont, P . Mariani, S . Bonacorsi, I . Le Thomas, D . Deforche, and E . Bingen. 2001 . Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical group B streptococci isolated in France . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 45:1889-1891.
13. Kataja, J., P . Huovinen, M . Skurnik, The Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance, and H . Seppälä. 1999 . Erythromycin resistance genes in group A streptococci in Finland . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 43:48-52.
14. Kearney, J . A., K . Barbadora, E . O . Mason, E . R . Wald, and M . Green. 1999 . In vitro activities of the oxazolidinone compounds linezolid (PNU-100766) and eperzolid (PNU-100592) against middle ear isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae . Int . J . Antimicrob . Agents 12:141-144.
15. Lin, F . Y., P . H . Azimi, L . E . Weisman, J . B . Philips III, J . Regan, P . Clark, G . G . Rhoads, J . Clemens, J . Troendle, E . Pratt, R . A . Brenner, and V . Gill. 2000 . Antibiotic susceptibility profiles for group B streptococci isolated from neonates, 1995-1998 . Clin . Infect . Dis . 31:76-79.
16. Livermore, D . M., M . W . Carter, S . Bagel, B . Wiedemann, F . Baquero, E . Loza, H . P . Endtz, N . van Den Braak, C . J . Fernandes, L . Fernandes, N . Frimodt-Moller, L . S . Rasmussen, H . Giamarellou, E . Giamarellos-Bourboulis, V . Jarlier, J . Nguyen, C . E . Nord, M . J . Struelens, C . Nonhoff, J . Turnidge, J . Bell, R . Zbinden, S . Pfister, L . Mixson, and D . L . Shungu. 2001 . In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 45:1860-1867.
17. Livermore, D . M., A . M . Sefton, and G . M . Scott. 2003 . Properties and potential of ertapenem . J . Antimicrob . Chemother . 52:331-344.
18. Morales, W . J., S . S . Dickey, P . Bornick, and D . V . Lim. 1999 . Change in antibiotic resistance of group B streptococcus: impact on intrapartum management . Am . J . Obstet Gynecol . 181:310-314.
19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000 . Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100-S10 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
20. Odenholt, I. 2001 . Ertapenem: a new carbapenem . Expert Opin . Investig . Drugs 10:1157-1166.
21. Patel, R., M . S . Rouse, K . E . Piper, and J . M . Steckelberg. 1999 . In vitro activity of linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae . Diagn . Microbiol . Infect . Dis . 34:119-122.
22. Pearlman, M . D., C . L . Pierson, and R . G . Faix. 1998 . Frequent resistance of clinical group B streptococci isolates to clindamycin and erythromycin . Obstet . Gynecol . 92:258-261.
23. Poyart, C., L . Jardy, G . Quesne, P . Berche, and P . Trieu-Cuot. 2003 . Genetic basis of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae strains isolated in a French hospital . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 47:794-797.
24. Reinert, R . R., R . Lütticken, A . Bryskier, and A . Al-Lahham. 2003 . Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes in the pediatric population in Germany during 2000-2001 . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 47:489-493.
25. Roberts, M . C., J . Sutcliffe, P . Courvalin, L . B . Jensen, J . Rood, and H . Seppälä. 1999 . Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 43:2823-2830.
26. Rouse, D . J., W . W . Andrews, F . Y . Lin, C . W . Mott, J . C . Ware, and J . B . Philips III. 1998 . Antibiotic susceptibility profile of group B streptococcus acquired vertically . Obstet . Gynecol . 92:931-934.
27. Schrag, S . J., S . Zywicki, M . M . Farley, A . L . Reingold, L . H . Harrison, L . B . Lefkowitz, J . L . Hadler, R . Danila, P . R . Cieslak, and A . Schuchat. 2000 . Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis . N . Engl . J . Med . 342:15-20.
28. Schrag, S . J., R . Gorwitz, K . Fultz-Butts, and A . Schuchat. 2002 . Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease . Revised guidelines from CDC . Morb . Mortal . Wkly . Rep . Recomm . Rep . 51(RR-11):1-22.
29. Schuchat, A. 1999 . Group B streptococcus . Lancet 353:51-56.
30. Seppälä, H., M . Skurnik, H . Soini, M . C . Roberts, and P . Huovinen. 1998 . A novel erythromycin resistance methylase gene (ermTR) in Streptococcus pyogenes . Antimicrob . Agents Chemother . 42:257-262.
31. Tubau, F., R . Fernandez-Roblas, J . Linares, R . Martin, and F . Soriano. 2001 . In vitro activity of linezolid and 11 other antimicrobials against 566 clinical isolates and comparison between NCCLS microdilution and Etest methods . J . Antimicrob . Chemother . 47:675-680.

Free Online Full-text Article

What Is Prokaryote?, What Is Pcr?, What Is Biofilm?, What Is Molecular Biology?, What Is MIC?, e, Bacteria, s, Microorganisms, c, Microbe, r, Bacteriology, i, Bacterium, i, Rhizobacterium, n, Erwinia, s, Escherichia coli, r, Bacteriological, o, Staphylococcus aureus, i, Bacteriological, n, Beta lactamase, c, Bacillus, i, Escherichia coli, o, Escherichia coli, a, Yeasts, c, Antibiotics, n, Klebsiella, c, Microorganism, o, Escherichia coli, e, Yeasts, a, Microorganism, o, Escherichia coli, a, S. cerevisiae, e, Yeasts, c, Botulism




 

© 2005 Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) | Privacy Statement | P.O. Box 1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland, phone: +358 9 85172920, fax: +358 9 8749481, e-mail: microbiology@bionewsonline.com
 

Last modified: May 25, 2005