|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2004, p . 5614-5620, Vol . 186, No . 17
A
Regulatory Trade-Off as a Source of Strain Variation in the Species
Escherichia coli
|
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
There are few existing indications that strain variation in
prokaryotic gene regulation is common or has evolutionary advantage .
In this study, we report on isolates of Escherichia coli with
distinct ratios of sigma factors (RpoD,
D,
or
70
and RpoS or
S)
that affect transcription initiated by RNA polymerase . Both
laboratory E . coli K-12 lineages and nondomesticated isolates
exhibit strain-specific endogenous levels of RpoS protein . We
demonstrate that variation in genome usage underpins intraspecific
variability in transcription patterns, resistance to external
stresses, and the choice of beneficial mutations under nutrient
limitation . Most unexpectedly, RpoS also controlled strain variation
with respect to the metabolic capability of bacteria with more than a
dozen carbon sources . Strains with higher
S
levels were more resistant to external stress but metabolized fewer
substrates and poorly competed for low concentrations of nutrients .
On the other hand, strains with lower
S
levels had broader nutritional capabilities and better competitive
ability with low nutrient concentrations but low resistance to
external stress . In other words, RpoS influenced both r and
K strategist functions of bacteria simultaneously . The
evolutionary principle driving strain variation is proposed to be a
conceptually novel trade-off that we term SPANC (for
"self-preservation and nutritional competence") . The availability of
multiple SPANC settings potentially broadens the niche occupied by a
species consisting of individuals with narrow specialization and
reveals an evolutionary advantage offered by polymorphic regulation .
Regulatory diversity is likely to be a significant contributor to
complexity in a bacterial world in which multiple sigma factors are a
universal feature .
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
The major source of variation in prokaryotes is thought to be the
loss or gain of functional genes or elements, such as pathogenicity
islands (14, 33) . Members of a bacterial
species such as Escherichia coli have common properties and
similar chromosomal organizations, but the species is phenotypically
diverse (44) . Isolates of E . coli exhibit
many distinct properties, including distinct growth rates (28)
and stress sensitivities (1, 43) . Some of
the differences are undoubtedly due to loss or gain of genes,
but is there also a difference in gene usage or expression between
strains? The gene regulatory consistency of bacteria is relatively
poorly studied, but it needs to be understood if the full range of
bacterial variation is to be established . In this study, we
investigated whether strain-specific gene usage is a source of
bacterial variation in E . coli .
Our starting point for examining this question arose from recent
studies of the polymorphism of the RpoS sigma factor in isolates of
E . coli and Salmonella (11, 31) .
If a central regulator of stress resistance genes (RpoS or
S
[24, 40]) is not conserved,
then how constant is gene usage on a global scale? It is evident from
both laboratory studies and the occurrence of rpoS mutations
in natural populations that regulatory divergence can arise and
flourish in particular environments (11) . In this study,
we found that natural regulatory settings are far from uniform
within a species and include a wide range of possibilities .
A significant level of control over expression of multiple genes
in bacteria involves RNA polymerase sigma factors, which partition
transcription to different bacterial promoters (13,
17) . The concentration of a sigma factor, such as
S,
controls general stress resistance, starvation survival (16),
and gene expression under nutrient limitation (10) .
In addition, because
S
competes for a fixed amount of RNA polymerase, the level of
S
also inversely influences the expression of other
factor-controlled genes, including housekeeping genes (8,
26) . Within this expanding model of cellular
control through
factor competition (20, 21), we
investigated whether RpoS protein levels also influenced additional
phenotypic and nutritional abilities of various E . coli
strains . As shown below, an unexpected inverse relationship between
stress resistance and nutritional capabilities was found in different
strains . Furthermore, a molecular explanation of strain variation can
now be offered on the basis of the equally unexpected variation in
the endogenous concentration of sigma factors within a species . The
numerous implications of these findings for understanding bacterial
diversity and evolution are discussed below .
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains and strain construction. All bacterial strains used in
this study are shown in Table 1 . P1 transduction (29)
with P1 cml clr1000 grown on ZK1171 was used to introduce
rpoS::Tn10 into BW2952 and MG1655 . lac+
derivatives of BW2952, BW3709, ZK126, and ZK1171 were made by P1
transduction with P1 cml clr1000 grown on MG1655 .
|
To study nondomesticated E . coli strains, the extensive collection
of P . Reeves (Sydney, Australia) was surveyed for rpoS-related
properties . Forty-one pathogenic and EcoR isolates were screened
(34) . Of these, only 16 strains were RpoS+
as determined by the glycogen screening test described below . In
further phenotypic screening, isolates EcoR38 and EcoR10 and O157:H7
isolate M534 were found to exhibit the range of properties shown by
K-12 strains MG1655, ZK126, and BW2952 and were used for further
experiments . An rpoS mutation could not be introduced into the
P1-resistant non-K-12 strains by transduction, so rpoS null
mutants of M534 and EcoR38 were isolated directly from chemostat
cultures as previously described (31) to obtain strains
BW3737 and BW3736, respectively .
Growth medium and culture conditions. The medium used in chemostat cultures was minimal medium A (29) . The carbon source in all cases was glucose, which was present at a concentration of 0.02 or 0.04% (wt/vol) in the feed medium in glucose-limiting experiments . For batch cultures and agar plates, glucose or acetate was included at a concentration of 0.2% (wt/vol) . Eighty-milliliter chemostat cultures were set up as described previously (31) . The dilution rates were set to 0.1 h–1 (doubling time, 6.9 h) . The culture densities were between 1.9 x 108 and 2.1 x 108 bacteria ml–1 .
To assess the metabolism of 95 substrates by the strains in a Biolog GN2 MicroPlate (Oxoid Ltd., Sydney, Australia) (3), the manufacturer's instructions were followed . Positive readings were defined as optical densities at 600 nm of >0.2 after 24 h of incubation .
Detection of rpoS status. rpoS mutants were distinguished from wild-type strains by staining glycogen in colonies on Luria agar plates . The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and then left at 4°C for 24 h before they were flooded with concentrated iodine as previously described (31) .
rpoS amplification and DNA sequencing. A 1,302-bp fragment containing the rpoS gene was amplified from chemostat isolates by PCR by using two external primers, RpoSF1 (5'-CGGACCTTTTATTGTGCACA-3') and RpoSR1 (5'-TGATTACCTGAGTGCCTACG-3'), and an internal primer, RpoSI (5'-CTGTTAACGGCCGAAGAAGA-3'), as previously described (31) .
ß-Galactosidase and catalase assays. Five-milliliter samples were removed from chemostat cultures, and ß-galactosidase activity was measured as described by Miller (29) by using sodium dodecyl sulfate and chloroform-treated cells . KatE/hydroperoxidase II catalase activity was assayed as described by Visick and Clarke (42) .
Quantitation of RNA polymerase subunits. Bacteria were harvested from 1-day-old chemostats, extracted, and analyzed by using the standard quantitative immunoblot system (19) . Probing was performed with antibodies against purified RpoA, RpoD, or RpoS in parallel with known amounts of purified RNA polymerase subunits . The data presented below are means from three blots of each of two independent samples .
Tolerance to external stress. Assays were conducted with 1-day-old chemostat cultures (31) of each strain . To test acid resistance in rich media, the percentage of survivors was measured after 30 min of exposure to Luria broth acidified to pH 1 with HCl . Bacteria were plated directly onto nutrient agar plates, and dilutions were counted after overnight incubation at 37°C . Survival of bacteria in water was assessed after 15 h of incubation at 25°C .
| RESULTS |
|---|
Strain variation in metabolism and stress resistance. We
compared six E . coli strains, all rpoS+, for metabolism
of 95 substrates in a Biolog assay (3) . Several
strains utilized 47 to 50 substrates, but BW2952 and M534 metabolized
only 31 and 24 substrates, respectively (see Table S2 in the
supplemental material) . To test the possible role of
S
in metabolism, rpoS-defective derivatives of the strains were
also assayed . Strikingly, the number of substrates metabolized by
M534 and BW2952 greatly increased upon introduction of an rpoS
mutation (Fig . 1A) . The nutritional profiles of the
rpoS disruption mutants were generally similar . Some
individual metabolic differences were found and were probably due to
structural gene differences between strains (35),
but the results in Fig . 1 suggest that RpoS has a pleiotropic
effect on the metabolic capability of certain bacteria . The
substrates that were poorly utilized by both BW2952 and M534, whose
metabolism was stimulated by an rpoS disruption, included
D-melibiose, ß-methyl-D-glucoside,
L-rhamnose, D-sorbitol,
acetic acid, D-galacturonic acid, succinic acid,
bromosuccinic acid, L-alanine,
L-alanyl-glycine, L-asparagine, L-aspartic
acid, and DL-
-glycerol
phosphate . The complete Biolog results are shown in Table S2 in the
supplemental material .
|
Interestingly, the metabolic capabilities were inversely related to
the stress resistance properties of the six strains . Consistent with
previous surveys, E . coli isolates are not uniformly stress
resistant (1, 43) and as shown in Fig.
1B and C, the nutritionally versatile strains, such
as MG1655 and EcoR10, were the strains that were most sensitive to
stress . Conversely, the nutritionally restricted strains were the
most stress resistant . An rpoS mutation disrupted resistance
to starvation and the osmotic shock that would be experienced during
incubation in water, as expected from the established role of RpoS (16) .
Similarly, resistance to acid was also low in rpoS mutants .
Acetate was one of the substrates whose metabolism was stimulated
by an rpoS disruption . A further indication of the role of
S
in nutrition came from prolonged incubation of the E . coli K-12
isolates on acetate plates (Fig . 2) . BW2952 showed much
poorer growth than MG1655, which is consistent with the Biolog data .
Growth of ZK126 was partially impaired on acetate plates . However,
after 5 days, individual colonies that grew faster appeared in
the BW2952 streak lines on acetate medium . All of these colonies
proved to be rpoS mutants (data not shown) . Growth of a defined
rpoS derivative of the BW2952 strain, as well as ZK126 (Fig .
2), on acetate was much faster, so the suppression of
metabolic capacity by RpoS could be overcome by rpoS
mutations .
|
Sigma factor levels in strains of E . coli. To test the
basis of the differences in metabolic and stress properties among the
RpoS+ strains, the endogenous levels of the RNA polymerase
components and
factors (40) were measured in the strains, as
shown in Fig . 2 and 3 . In quantitating the
concentration of the
S
factor relative to the concentration of a core subunit (RpoA) or the
housekeeping-metabolic
factor (RpoD), it was clear that the RpoD/RpoA ratio was relatively
constant (Fig . 3) . In contrast, the amount of
S
varied, and the organisms with a low RpoS/RpoD ratio were more
proficient in acetate utilization and metabolism generally .
Unexpectedly, the three K-12 strains shown in Fig . 2
differed in the proportion of the sigma factor over a sixfold range
during growth on acetate despite having identical rpoS
sequences (results not shown) . The difference in RpoS levels was also
not confined to acetate medium, and the concentrations of RpoS
protein were markedly different in isolates at identical steady-state
growth rates in a glucose-limited chemostat (Fig . 3) .
Especially interesting was the relationship among stress sensitivity,
metabolic capacity, and the endogenous level of RpoS .
|
Transcriptional effects of distinct RpoS/RpoD ratios. The most
likely way that RpoS levels influenced metabolic and stress
capabilities was through altered patterns of transcription . The
effect of having distinct steady-state RpoS levels in the six
isolates was revealed by comparing the expression of housekeeping
genes transcribed by using RpoD (
D
or
70)
with the expression of genes expressed through RpoS or
S
(Fig . 4) . Consistent with the
S/
D ratios in Fig . 3, quantitation of expression of a
D-dependent
gene, lacZ, showed that there was a trend towards increasing
lacZ expression with decreasing
S
in strains, and the highest levels of LacZ were in rpoS
mutants (Fig . 4A) . Conversely, when katE, an
rpoS-dependent gene (30), was examined, the levels
of expression were highest in the high RpoS strains (Fig . 4B)
(EcoR38 was anomalous in not having KatE activity) . There was a
good correlation between the expression patterns and the stress and
metabolism capabilities of the six strains .
|
Strain variation in mutational adaptation and competitive ability.
RpoS levels in different strains of E . coli influenced two other
bacterial characteristics . First, the mutational adaptation
pathway of strains growing under nutrient limitation (10) was
initiated differently . Under experimental evolution conditions
(32), as shown in Fig . 5, some strains,
including strain BW2952 studied previously (11,
31), rapidly accumulated rpoS mutations in
chemostats under glucose limitation . ZK126 accumulated rpoS
mutations more slowly, whereas populations of MG1655 did not acquire
rpoS mutations . Again, there was a good correlation between
RpoS and
S-dependent
transcriptional patterns and the rate of mutation accumulation; the
strains with high
S
levels were under stronger pressure to lose RpoS in a
nutrient-stressed situation . These results parallel the acetate
mutation selection results shown in Fig . 2 .
|
An important ecological characteristic of bacteria is the ability to
compete for low levels of nutrients (9) . As shown in Fig .
6, the RpoS status is a major determinant of fitness in
a low-nutrient environment . The BW2952 strain with a high level of
S
was initially outcompeted in a glucose-limited environment compared
to MG1655 (Fig . 6A), so not only was the BW2952
strain more restricted in terms of nutritional range, but it also had
a lower fitness for glucose . After further growth, the appearance of
rpoS derivatives in the BW2952 subpopulation increased the
competitiveness of the clone, whereas no rpoS mutants of the
MG1655 bacteria appeared . The proportion of the BW2952 clone
continued to increase due to the accumulation of further mutations
described elsewhere (32) . When competition
experiments were started with rpoS derivatives of BW2952 and
MG1655, there was no initial difference in fitness, suggesting that
the two strains had similar metabolic potentials once the constraint
imposed by RpoS was removed (Fig . 6) .
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The distinct levels of RpoS in different strains were a major source
of phenotypic differences in six strains of E . coli . Our
results show that even the metabolic profile of bacteria is subject
to regulatory variation . This has major implications for
microbiology, in which nutrition is often used to type organisms . Our
results indicate that the ability to use or not use groups of
substrates may be simply a question of global regulation .
Another unexpected conclusion from this study is that a regulatory setting affects both the competitiveness of a bacterium for specific substrates and also its range of substrates . Strains such as EcoR10 and MG1655 are the best specialists for using glucose and also have the broadest nutritional profile . This finding is novel in ecological terms, as generalist and specialist strategies are considered mutually exclusive in ecology (22) .
These results also have an impact on our molecular understanding
of trade-offs in evolution, which are characterized by the inability
of an organism to optimize different traits simultaneously (7,
38) . The inverse relationship between nutrition and
stress resistance exhibited by bacteria with low and high levels of
S
is not a nutrition-nutrition trade-off like that between R and
k strategists (25) or a
specialist-generalist balance (22), but it is a novel
stress protection-nutrition SPANC ("self-preservation and nutritional
competence") trade-off . Our results are also consistent with
the conclusion that there is no expected trade-off in fitness between
adapting to low concentrations of nutrients and adapting to high
concentrations of nutrients (41) . Transcriptional competition
between
factors (8, 26) and the different RpoS/RpoD
levels provide a molecular explanation for the set SPANC balance for
different isolates .
Historically, it is important that in gene expression studies with
E . coli K-12 workers have used numerous genetic backgrounds,
including the MG1655, MC4100, and W3110 lineages used here, but our
results suggest that RNA polymerase differences need to be considered
before strains are interchanged or compared . Indeed, there was a
previously noted discrepancy in sigma factor content even within the
W3110 lineage (19) . It is also relevant that
recent results showed that underproduction of RpoD mimics a stringent
response (27), which may also partially be the situation
in the strains with high
S
levels . In turn, this may be relevant to the finding that growth rate
variation is due to differences in ribosomal function (28),
which is in turn subject to stringent control (6) .
Even more intriguingly, the ratios of other sigma factors may also be
subject to trade-offs, because the
54
content of some W3110 strains was also not constant (19) .
From our survey, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that
particular
S
levels are associated with particular taxonomic groups or virotypes
of E . coli . If anything, the evidence points the other way,
with a wide range of settings found even within the taxonomic A
subgroup (36), including EcoR10 and the three K-12
strains . Still, a more systematic study is needed to test this point .
More speculatively, the variation in
factor levels is likely to be variation that can arise frequently,
and it occurred independently in the three K-12 lineages, as can
happen during prolonged laboratory storage (19,
39) . Adaptation of the SPANC balance is therefore
likely to be common in nature .
So far, no explanation for what fixes the discrete but distinct
RpoS levels in the different strains is available . At least in the
three K-12 strains with identical rpoS sequences, the
influence on RpoS levels must be extragenic . Complicating matters is
the finding that more than one regulatory element may differentiate
the strains with low and high RpoS levels because there are numerous,
complex inputs for controlling the level of this
factor in the cell (15) . Several regulators control
each stage of rpoS transcription and translation and
S
protein stability (18) . Detailed investigation of
each input is needed to identify the causes of RpoS variation .
Intracellular ppGpp was a potential source of variation in RpoS
levels, particularly as BW2952 (an MC4100 derivative) has a known
relA1 mutation . However, when ppGpp levels were compared by the
method of Rudd et al . (37), there was no
correlation between ppGpp levels and RpoS levels . BW2952 had low
ppGpp levels but high RpoS levels, whereas M534 had high levels of
both . Likewise, the ppGpp level in EcoR10 was lower than the ppGpp
level in MG1655, but both strains had low RpoS levels (results not
shown) . Hence, ppGpp levels are nonuniform in different strains but
do not solely explain the RpoS differences observed .
Nevertheless, it is also clear that intragenic changes in rpoS can influence all the properties discussed above . Leaky rpoS mutations that exhibit partial stress resistance are also known to be selected in particular environments (12, 31); these isolates also show altered transcription patterns and partial increases in metabolic versatility (results not shown) . The rpoS isolates in population samples (11) also add to the SPANC diversity of bacteria, and rpoS mutants are the best-adapted organisms nutritionally (Fig . 1 and 2) . Hence, the SPANC setting of members of E . coli can be adjusted by both extragenic and intragenic rpoS polymorphisms .
In summary, a
factor protein that is associated with RNA polymerase and central to
global gene expression is present at various endogenous levels in a
species . Given that multiple
factors are universal in bacteria, it is highly likely that such
variations are common in the prokaryotic world and that variation in
genome usage extends to bacteria, as well as to higher organisms (4) .
The regulatory variation resulting from set levels of RpoS provides
a means of broadening the ecological and phenotypic properties
of a species . These results suggest that polymorphic regulation is
central to understanding the phenotypic properties of bacteria,
bacterial strain variation, and the trade-offs between environmentally
useful characteristics . Finally, the SPANC trade-off may be a
more general kind of evolutionary adaptation that may be important
for free-living organisms that encounter nonconstant environments .
Speculatively, the availability of multiple SPANC settings can be a
considerable advantage to a species by broadening its niche, so
individuals with narrow SPANC specialization may fill environments
with particular stress-nutrition combinations .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Etsuko Koshio for some of the assays and Paul Rainey, Mike
Cashel, and Andy Holmes for constructive comments .
We also thank the Australian Research Council for funding support .
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author . Mailing address: School of Molecular
and Microbial Biosciences G08, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006,
Australia . Phone: (61) (2) 9351 4277 . Fax: (61) (2) 9351 4571 . E-mail: tferenci@mail.usyd.edu.au.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/ .
| REFERENCES |
|---|
What Is Botulism?,
What Is Nitrification?,
What Is Bioreactor?,
What Is Genetics?,
What Is Pcr?,
n,
Bacterium,
i,
Bacteriology,
a,
Microbiology,
i,
Microbes,
n,
Microorganisms,
n,
Clostridia,
a,
Lactobacillus,
n,
Multidrug resistant,
a,
Halophilic bacterium,
o,
Staphylococcus,
s,
Schizosaccharomyces,
o,
Antibiotics,
r,
Growth media,
s,
Wastewater,
o,
Lactococci,
r,
Staphylococcus,
r,
Achromobacter,
a,
Lactococci,
s,
Salmonella,
a,
Phage,
n,
Thermophile,
c,
Pathogenic bacterium,
s,
Fermentations,
c,
Antibiotics,
i,
Escherichia coli,
e,
Cell suspensions
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||