|








| |
Scientific
Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C
| United States Patent |
6 620 585 |
| Zyskind |
September 16, 2003 |
Use of ectoenzymes and secreted enzymes to monitor cellular
proliferation
Abstract
The present invention relates to methods of measuring cellular proliferation
using ectoenzymes such as membrane-bound chitobiase (N,N'-diacetylchitobiase)
and nucleic acids for use in such methods.
| Inventors: |
Zyskind; Judith W. (La Jolla, CA) |
| Assignee: |
Elitra Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (San Diego, CA) |
| Appl. No.: |
630929 |
| Filed: |
August 2, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
435/6; 435/252.3; 435/252.34;
435/375; 536/24.5 |
| Intern'l Class: |
C12Q 001/68; C07H 021/04 |
| Field of Search: |
514/44
435/6,325,375,320.1,252.3,252.34 536/23.1,24.3,24.32,24.5 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4259442 |
Mar., 1981 |
Gayral. |
|
| 5401629 |
Mar., 1995 |
Harpold et al. |
|
| 5436128 |
Jul., 1995 |
Harpold et al. |
|
| 5587292 |
Dec., 1996 |
Laine et al. |
|
| 5602020 |
Feb., 1997 |
Laine et al. |
|
| 5693519 |
Dec., 1997 |
Laine et al. |
|
| 2002/0058260 |
May., 2002 |
Zyskind et al. |
|
| Foreign Patent Documents |
| 0 174 477 |
Mar., 1986 |
EP. |
|
| WO 98/02742 |
Jan., 1998 |
WO. |
|
| WO 98/49320 |
Nov., 1998 |
WO. |
|
| WO 99/14311 |
Mar., 1999 |
WO. |
|
Other References
Cid, et al. 1994. Yeast Exo-.sctn.-glucanases can be used as efficient and
readily detectable reporter genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast,
10:747-756.
Piruzian, et al. 1998. The use of a thermostable beta-glucanase gene from
Clostridium thermocellum as a reporter gene in plants. Molecular & General
Genetics. XP-002171323.
Fang et al., Veterinary Microbiology, 46:361-367, 1995, "A fluorometric
.beta.-glucuronidase assay for analysis of bacterial growth in milk".
Hayashi, et al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 59(10):1981-1982, 1995,
"Identificattion of the positions of disulfide bonds of chitinase from a
marine bacterium, Alteromonas sp. strain 0-7".
Mazmanian, et al., PNAS, 97(10):5510-5515, 2000, "Staphylococcus aureus
sortase mutants defective in the display of surface proteins and in the
pathogenesis of animal infections".
Stathopoulos, C. Membr. Cell Biol., 12(1):1-8, "Structural features,
physiological roles, and biotechnological applications of the membrane
proteases of the OmpT bacterial endopeptidase family: A micro-review".
Altschul, et al., J. Mol. Biol, 215:403-410, 1990, "Basic Local Alignment
Search Tool".
Ball, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 174(24):8043-8056, 1992, "Dramatic
Changes in Fis Levels upon Nutrient Upshift in Escherichia coli".
Bernstein, H. D., Current Opinion in Microbiology, 3:203-209, 2000, "The
Biogenesis and Assembly of Bacterial Membrane Proteins".
Biswas, et al., Biochemistry, 38:10919-10928, 1999, "Mechanism of DnaB
Helicase of Escherichia coli: Structual Domains Involved in ATP Hydrolysis,
DNA Binding, and Oligomerization".
Bootsma, et al., J. Bacteriol., 181(16):5090-5093, 1999, "Moraxella
(Branhamella) catarrhalis BRO .beta.-Lactamase: A Lipoprotein of
Gram-Positive Origin?".
Braun, et al., Cell, 40:159-169, 1985, "Autoregulation of the DNA
Replication Gene dnaA in E. coli K-12".
Brosius, J., et al., J. Mol. Biol., 148:107-127, 1981, "Gene Organization
and Primary Structure of a Ribosomal RNA Operon from Escherichia coli".
Bunn, et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 165:123-127, 1998, "Wall-associated
Processing of Extracellular Enzymes of Staphylococcus Simulans Biovar
Staphylolyticus".
Camara, et al., Infection and Immunity, 62(9):3688-3695, 1994, "A
Neuroaminidase from Streptococcus penumoniae Has the Features of a Surface
Protein".
Chamberlain, et al., J. Med. Microbiol., 44(2):125-129, 1996, "Genetic
Regulation of Fatty Acid Modifying Enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus".
Chang, et al., J. Bacteriol., 134(3):1141-1156, 1978, "Construction and
Characterization of Amplifiable Multicopy DNA Cloning Vehicles Derived from
the P15A Cryptic Miniplasmid".
Chiaramello et al., J. Bacteriol., 172(4):2013-2019, 1992, "Coupling of DNA
Replication to Growth Rate in Escherichia coli: A Possible Role for
Guanosine Tetraphosphate".
Chmouryguina, et al., Infection and Immunity, 64(7):2387-2390, 1996,
"Conservation of the C5a Peptidase Genes in Group A and B Streptococci".
Churchill, et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 18(3):589-597, 1989, "The
Distribution of Restriction Enzymes Sites in Escherichia coli".
Clarke, et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(15):8805-8814, 1995,
"Cloning and Expression of the .beta.-N-Acetylglucosaminidase Gene from
Streptococcus pneumoniae".
Cohen-Kupiec, et al., Curr Opin. Biotechnol., 9(3):270-277, 1988, "The
Molecular Biology of Chitin Digestion".
Daugherty, et al., Protein Engineering, 12(7):613-621, 1999, "Development of
an Optimized Expression System for the Screening of Antibody Libraries
Displayed on the Escherichia coli surface".
Dekker, N., Molecular Microbiology, 35(4):711-717, 2000, "Outer-membrane
Phospholipase A: Known Structure, Unknown Biological Function".
den Hollander, et al., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 41(1):95-100,
1997, "Synergism between Tobramycin and Ceftazidime against a Resistant
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain, Tested in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model".
Dickson, R.C., et al., Science, 187:27-35, 1975, "Genetic Regulation: The
Lac Control Region".
Diedrich, et al., BioTechniques, 16(5):916-923, 1994, "A Versatile Plasmid
Vector System for the Regulated Expression of Genes in Escherichia coli".
Diederich, et al., Plasmid, 28:14-24, 1992, "New Cloning Vectors for
Integration into the .lambda. Attachment Site attB of the Escherichia coli
Chromosome".
Doern, et al., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 32(12):1747-1753,
1988, "Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Haemophilus influenzae,
Branhamella catarrhalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae".
Fricke, et al., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1454:236-250, 1999,
"Characterization and Purification of an Outer Membrane Metalloproteinase
from Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Fibrinogenoltyic Activity".
Froelich, et al., J. Bacteriol., 178(20):6006-6012, 1996, "Fis Binding in
the dnaA Operon Promoter Region".
Giraudo, et al., Can. J. Microbiol., 40:677-681, 1994, "Characterization of
a Tn551-mutant of Staphylococcus aureus Defective in the Production of
Several Exoproteins".
Goodman, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:11910-11914, 1992,
"Deformation of DNA during Site-Specific Recombination of Bacteriophage
Lambda: Replacement of IHF Protein by HU Protein or Sequence-Directed
Bends".
Gotz, et al., Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, 93:15-25, 1998,
"Staphylococcal Lipases: Molecular Characterisation, Secretion, and
Processing".
Groicher, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 182(7):1794-1801, 2000. "The
Staphylococcus aureus IrgAB Operon Modulates Murein Hydrolase Activity and
Penicillin Tolerance".
Gutmann, et al., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 30(6):906-912, 1996,
"Involvement of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 with Other Penicillin-Binding
Proteins in Lysis of Escherichia coli by Some .beta.-Lactam Antibiotics
Alone and in Synergistic Lytic Effect of Amdinocillin (Mecillinam)".
Hansen, F. G., et al., EMBO J., 1(9):1043-1048, 1982, "The Nucleoside
Sequence of the dnaA Gene Promoter and of the Adjacent rpmH Gene, Coding for
the Ribosomal Protein L34, of Escherichia coli".
Hansen, et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 10(22):7373-7385, 1982, "The
Nucleotide Sequence of the dnaA Gene and the First Part of the dnaN Gene of
Escherichia coli K-12".
Hiasa, et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, 274(38):27244-27248, 1999,
"Initiation of Bidirectional Replication at the Chromosomal Origin is
Directed by the Interaction between Helicase and Primase".
Igarashi, et al., Microbiol. Imunol., 36(6):643-647, 1992, "Characterization
of an Exo-.beta.-D-Fructosidase from Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt".
Igarashi, et al., Microbiol. Imunol., 36(9):969-976, 1992, "Characterization
of the Dextranase Purified from Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt".
Jannatipour, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 169(8):3785-3791, 1987,
"Translocation of Vibrio harveyi N,N'-Diacetylchitobiase to the Outer
Membrane of Escherichia coli".
Kalabat, et al., BioTechniques, 25(6):1030-1035, 1998, "Chitobiase, A New
Reporter Enzyme".
Mazmanian, et al., Science, 285:760-763, 1999, "Staphylococcus aureus
Sortase, an Enzyme that Anchors Surface Proteins to the Cell Wall".
Messer, et al., "Initiation of Chromosome Replication," in F. C. Neidhart,
et al. (Eds.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella Cellular and Molecular
Biology, pp. 1579-1601, ASM Press, Washington, D.C., 1996.
Miller, J. H., A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics, p. 73, CSH Laboratory
Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1992.
Nagaraja, et al., J. Bacteriol., 172(11):6540-6550, 1990, "Specificity
Determinants in the Attachment Sites of Bacteriophages HK022 and .lambda.".
Navarre, et al., Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 63(1):174-229,
1999, "Surface Proteins of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Mechanisms of Their
Targeting to the Cell Wall Envelope".
Olsson-Liljequist, et al., Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl., 105:13-23, 1997,
"Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Sweden: III. Methodology for
Susceptibility Testing".
Orosz, et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 201:653-659, 1991, "Analysis of the Complex
Transcription Termination Region on the Escherichia coli rrnB Gene".
Oshida, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92:285-289, 1995, "A
Staphylococcus aureus Autolysin that has an N-acetylmuramoyl-Lalanine
Amidase Domain and an Endo-.beta.-N-acetylglucosaminidase Domain: Cloning,
Sequence Analysis, and Characterization".
Reilly, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 181(21):6797-6805, 1999, "Outer
Membrane Lipoprotein e (P4) of Haemophilus influenzae Is a Novel
Phosphomonoesterase".
Reilly, et al., Protein Expression and Purification, 17:401-409, 1999,
"Purification and Characterization of a Recombinant Haemophilus influenzae
Outer Membrane Phosphomonoesterase e (P4)".
San Martin, et al., Structure, 6(4):501-509, 1998, "Three-dimensional
Reconstructions from Cryoelectron Microscopy Images Reveal an Intimate
Complex Between Helicase DnaB and Its Loading Partner DnaC".
Schalk, et al., Biochemistry, 38:9357-9365, 1999, "Copurification of the
FpvA Ferric Pyoverdin Receptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with its Iron-Free
Ligand: Implications for Siderophore-Mediated Iron Transport".
Shipman, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 181(23):7206-7211, 1999,
"Physiological Characterization of SusG, and Outer Membrane Protein
Essential for Starch Utilization by Bacteriodes thetaiotaomicron".
Siezen, R. J., Antonie van Leewenhoek, 76:139-155, 1999, "Multi-domain,
Cell-envelope Proteinases of Lactic Acid Bacteria".
Sivaprasadarao, et al., Biochem. J., 296:209-215, 1993, "Expression of
Functional Human Retinol-binding Protein in Escherichia coli Using a
Secretion Vector".
Smith et al., Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 27:85-92, 1997, "Assessment of
the Synergistic Interactions of Levofloxacin and Ampicillin Against
Enterococcus faecium by the Checkerboard Agar Dilution and Time-Kill
Methods".
Smith, et al., Infection and Immunity, 60(6):2361-2367, 1992, "Cloning and
Nucleotide Sequence of the Gene Encoding the 136-Kilodalton Surface Protein
(Muramidase-Released Protein) of Streptococcus suis Type 2".
Soto-Gil, et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, 264(25):14778-14783,
1989, "N,N'-Diacetylchitobiase of Vibrio harveyi: Primary Structure,
Processing, and Evolutionary Relationships".
Soto-Gil, et al., in "Methods of Enzymology," vol. 161, 1988,
"N,N'-Diacetylchitobiase of Vibrio harveyi," pp. 524-529, Academic Press,
Inc., New York.
Soto-Gil, et al., "Cloning of Vibrio harveyi Chitinase and Chitobiase Genes
in Escherichia coli," in J. P. Zikakis (Ed.), 1984, Chitin, Chitosan, and
Related Enzymes, pp. 209-223, Academic Press, Inc., New York.
Stathopoulos, C., Membr. Cell Biol., 13(1):3-21, 1999, "Bacterial Outer
Membrane Proteins: Topological Analyses and Biotechnological Perspectives".
Stenberg, et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269(18):13468-13464,
1994, "Molecular Characterization of Protein Sir, a Streptococcal Cell
Surface Protein That Binds Both Immunologlobulin A and Immunoglobulin G".
Striebel, et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 262:832-839, 1999, "Eukaryotic Precurosr
Proteins are Processed by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Protein OmpP".
Suciu, et al., Molecular Microbiology, 21(1):181-195, 1996, "The 19-residue
Pro-peptide of Staphylococcal Nuclease has a Profound Secretion-Enhancing
Ability in Eschericia coli".
Sutton, et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273(51):34255-34262, 1998,
"Escherichia coli DnaA Protein: The N-Terminal Domain and Loading of DnaB
Helicase at the E. coli Chromosomal Origin".
Talon, et al., International Journal of Food Microbiology, 36:207-214, 1997,
"Hydrolysis of Esters by Staphylococci".
van der Meer, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 175(9):2578-2588, 1993,
"Characterization of the Lactococcus lactis Nisin A Operon Genes nisP,
Encoding a Subtilisin-Like Serine Protease Involved in Precursor Processing,
and NisR, Encoding a Regulatory Protein Involved in Nisin Biosynthesis".
Wanda, et al., Journal of Bacteriology, 176(13):3839-3850, 1994,
"Purification and Characterization of Streptococcus sobrinus Dextranase
Produced in Recombinant Escherichia coli and Sequence Analysis of the
Dextranase Gene".
Weschler, et al., Molec. Gen. Genetics, 13:273-284, 1971, "Escherichia coli
Mutants Temperature-Sensitive for DNA Synthesis".
Yanisch-Perron, et al., Gene, 33:103-119, 1985, "Improved M13 Phage Cloning
Vectors and Host Strains: Nucleotide Sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19
Vector".
International Search Report from foreign counterpart Application No.
PCT/US00/21049 dated Jul. 20, 2001. |
Primary Examiner: LeGuyader; John L.
Assistant Examiner: Schultz; James Douglas
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for screening a test compound for the ability to inhibit microbial
proliferation, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a population of microbial cells expressing an ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme, wherein said population of cells is contacted with a sublethal
level of an antisense nucleic acid that is complementary to at least a portion
of a nucleic acid that encodes a gene product which is required for
proliferation of said population of microbial cells, to reduce the activity or
amount of said gene product in said cells, to thereby produce sensitized
microbial cells;
(b) determining the extent of proliferation of said sensitized cells that
express said ectoenzyme or secreted ezyme by measuring the activity of said
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme;
(c) contacting said sensitized cells with a test compound and measuring the
extent of proliferation of said sensitized cells in response to said test
compound; and
(d) determining whether said test compound inhibits the proliferation of said
sensitized cells by comparing the activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
in said sensitized cells prior to contact with the test compound with the
activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme following contact with the test
compound.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is selected
from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella
(Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric
pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer membrane phospho lipase A,
Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein, Haemophilus
influenza? phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a
peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase
PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is
endogenous.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said sensitized cells contain an introduced
gene encoding said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein said population of cells is from an organism
selected from the group consisting of Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus
fumigatus, Bacillus anthracis, Campylobacter jejuni, Candida albicans, Chlamydia
pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatus, Clostridium botulinum, Cryptococcus
neoformans, E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, Haemophilus
influenzae, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycobacterium leprae,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Heisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Salmonella cholerasuis, Salmonella paratyphi, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella
typhimurium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Treponema
pallidum, and Yersinia pestis or any species falling within the genera of any of
the above species.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said antisense nucleic acid is transcribed
from an inducible promoter.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of contacting said
population of cells with a concentration of inducer which induces said antisense
nucleic acid to a sublethal level.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein said sublethal level of the antisense nucleic
acid is provided by contacting said population of cells with the antisense
nucleic acid.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein said sublethal level of the antisense nucleic
acid is provided by expressing the antisense in said population of cells.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein said gene product is a polypeptide.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein said gene product is an RNA.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein said test compound is from a combinatorial
chemical library.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein said test compound is a natural product.
15. A method for screening a test compound for the ability to inhibit microbial
proliferation, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a first population of unsensitized microbial cells expressing an
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme, wherein said first population of cells is
contacted with a sublethal level of an antisense nucleic acid that is
complementary to at least a portion of a nucleic acid that encodes a gene
product which is required for proliferation of said first population of
microbial cells, to reduce the activity or amount of said gene product in said
cells, to thereby produce sensitized microbial cells;
(b) determining the extent of proliferation of said sensitized cells that
express said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme by measuring the activity of said
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme;
(c) contacting said sensitized cells with a test compound and measuring the
extent of proliferation of said sensitized cells in response to said test
compound; and
(d) determining whether said test compound inhibits the proliferation of said
sensitized cells by comparing the activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
in said sensitized cells prior to contact with the test compound with the
activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme following contact with the test
compound,
(e) providing a second population of unsensitized microbial cells, wherein said
second population of unsensitized microbial cells are from the same population
of microbial cells as said first population of unsensitized microbial cells, and
said second population of unsensitized cells have not undergone sensitization
treatment of any kind;
(f) determining the extent of proliferation for said unsensitized cells that
express said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme by measuring the activity of said
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme;
(g) contacting said unsensitized cells with a test compound and measuring the
extent of proliferation of said unsensitized cells in response to said test
compound; and
(h) determining whether said test compound inhibits the proliferation of said
unsensitized cells by comparing the activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme in said unsensitized cells prior to contact with the test compound with
the activity of said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme following contact with the
test compound;
(i) determining whether said test compound inhibits the proliferation of said
sensitized cells to a greater extent than said compound inhibits the
proliferation of said unsensitized cells by comparing the change in activity of
said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in said sensitized cells following contact
with the test compound with the change in activity of said ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme in said unsensitized cells following contact with the test
compound.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is
selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase,
Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA
ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer membrane phospho
ipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein,
Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir,
streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase
PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase, and enterotoxin.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein said ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is
endogenous.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein said sensitized cells contain an introduced
gene encoding said ectoenzyme or secrete enzyme.
20. The method of claim 15, wherein said population of cells is from an organism
selected from the group consisting of Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus
fumigatus, Bacillus anthracis, Campylobacter jejuni, Candida albicans, Chlamydia
pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatus, Clostridium botulinum, Cryptococcus
neoformans, E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, Haemophilus
influenzae, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycobacterium leprae,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Salmonella cholerasuis, Salmonella paratyphi, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella
typhimurium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Treponema
pallidum, and Yersinia pestis or any species falling within the genera of any of
the above species.
21. The method of claim 15, wherein said antisense nucleic acid is transcribed
from an inducible promoter.
22. The method of claim 15, further comprising the step of contacting said first
population of unsensitized cells with a concentration of inducer which induces
said antisense nucleic acid to a sublethal level.
23. The method of claim 15, wherein said sublethal level of the antisense
nucleic acid is provided by contacting said first population of unsensitized
cells with the antisense nucleic acid.
24. The method of claim 15, wherein said sublethal level of the antisense
nucleic aid is provided by expressing the antisense in said first population of
unsensitized cells.
25. The method of claim 15, wherein said gene product is a polypeptide.
26. The method of claim 15, said gene product is an RNA.
27. The method of claim 15, wherein said test compound is from a combinatorial
chemical library.
28. The method of claim 15, wherein said test compound is a natural product.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the use of enzymes which are associated with
the cell (ectoenzymes) and secreted enzymes for monitoring cellular
proliferation.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Reporter enzymes are enzymes whose activities are easily assayed when present
inside cells. In order to study the regulation of a gene whose expression is
regulated by various environmental and/or cellular factors or influences, a gene
encoding a reporter enzyme may be fused to the coding region or to the
regulatory region of the regulated gene. Reporter genes may be used to determine
whether a sequence contains a promoter or other cis-acting element which directs
transcription, such as an enhancer. In addition, reporter genes may be used to
identify regulatory sites in promoters or other cis-acting elements and to
determine the effects of mutating these regulatory sites on the level of gene
expression directed by the promoters or other cis-acting elements. Reporter
genes may also be used to detect successful transformation, to monitor gene
expression under various conditions, to assess the subcellular location of an
expressed protein and to identify drugs such as antibiotics.
Since the discovery of penicillin, the use of antibiotics to treat the ravages
of bacterial infections has saved millions of lives. With the advent of these
"miracle drugs," for a time it was popularly believed that humanity might, once
and for all, be saved from the scourge of bacterial infections. In fact, during
the 1980s and early 1990s, many large pharmaceutical companies cut back or
eliminated antibiotics research and development. They believed that infectious
disease caused by bacteria finally had been conquered and that markets for new
drugs were limited. Unfortunately, this belief was overly optimistic.
The tide is beginning to turn in favor of the bacteria as reports of drug
resistant bacteria become more frequent. The United States Centers for Disease
Control announced that one of the most powerful known antibiotics, vancomycin,
was unable to treat an infection of the common Staphylococcus aureus (staph).
This organism is commonly found in our environment and is responsible for many
nosocomial infections. The import of this announcement becomes clear when one
considers that vancomycin was used for years to treat infections caused by
Staphylococcus species as well as other stubborn strains of bacteria. In short,
bacteria are becoming resistant to our most powerful antibiotics. If this trend
continues, it is conceivable that we will return to a time when what are
presently considered minor bacterial infections are fatal diseases.
Over-prescription and improper prescription habits by some physicians have
caused an indiscriminate increase in the availability of antibiotics to the
public. The patients are also partly responsible, since they will often
improperly use the drug, thereby generating yet another population of bacteria
that is resistant, in whole or in part, to traditional antibiotics.
The bacterial pathogens that have haunted humanity remain, in spite of the
development of modern scientific practices to deal with the diseases that they
cause. Drug resistant bacteria are now an increasing threat to the health of
humanity. A new generation of antibiotics is needed to once again deal with the
pending health threat that bacteria present.
Discovery of New Antibiotics
As more and more bacterial strains become resistant to the panel of available
antibiotics, new antibiotics are required to treat infections. In the past,
practitioners of pharmacology would have to rely upon traditional methods of
drug discovery to generate novel, safe and efficacious compounds for the
treatment of disease. Traditional drug discovery methods involve blindly testing
potential drug candidate-molecules, often selected at random, in the hope that
one might prove to be an effective treatment for some disease. The process is
painstaking and laborious, with no guarantee of success. Today, the average cost
to discover and develop a new drug exceeds US $500 million, and the average time
from laboratory to patient is 15 years. Improving this process, even
incrementally, would represent a huge advance in the generation of novel
antimicrobial agents.
Newly emerging practices in drug discovery utilize a number of biochemical
techniques to provide for directed approaches to creating new drugs, rather than
discovering them at random. For example, gene sequences and proteins encoded
thereby that are required for the proliferation of a microorganism make
excellent targets since exposure of bacteria to compounds active against these
targets would result in the inactivation of the microorganism. Once a target is
identified, biochemical analysis of that target can be used to discover or to
design molecules that interact with and alter the functions of the target. Use
of physical and computational techniques to analyze structural and biochemical
properties of targets in order to derive compounds that interact with such
targets is called rational drug design and offers great potential. Thus,
emerging drug discovery practices use molecular modeling techniques,
combinatorial chemistry approaches, and other means to produce and screen and/or
design large numbers of candidate compounds.
Nevertheless, while this approach to drug discovery is clearly the way of the
future, problems remain. For example, the initial step of identifying molecular
targets for investigation can be an extremely time consuming task. It may also
be difficult to design molecules that interact with the target by using computer
modeling techniques. Furthermore, in cases where the function of the target is
not known or is poorly understood, it may be difficult to design assays to
detect molecules that interact with and alter the functions of the target. To
improve the rate of novel drug discovery and development, methods of identifying
important molecular targets in pathogenic microorganisms and methods for
identifying molecules that interact with and alter the functions of such
molecular targets are urgently required.
To facilitate the identification of new drugs, automated assays which allow the
effects of a large number of candidate compounds on microbial proliferation to
be easily, rapidly and inexpensively evaluated are required. The present
invention relates to the use of ectoenzymes and secreted enzymes in assays for
measuring cellular proliferation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One embodiment of the present invention is a method for measuring cellular
proliferation in a sample comprising obtaining a sample of cells which express
an ectoenzyme or a secreted enzyme, determining the level of activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the sample and correlating the level of
activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme with the extent of cellular
proliferation. The step of determining the level of activity of the ectoenzyme
or secreted enzyme may comprise contacting the cells with an agent which yields
a detectable product when acted upon by the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme and
determining the level of the detectable product in the sample. The ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis BRO
beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP
endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG
starch utilization protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase,
streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis
serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP,
proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae
neuraminidase, Streptococcus sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase,
Streptococcus mutans exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine
hydrolase, staphylococcal lipases, lysostaphin,
endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease, staphylococcal esterase,
S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus
autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A, staphylokinase and
enterotoxin. The determining step may comprise determining the level of activity
of a secreted enzyme by contacting the growth medium of the cells with an agent
which yields a detectable product when acted upon by the secreted enzyme and
determining the level of the detectable product in the sample. The determining
step may comprise determining the level of activity of a secreted enzyme by
contacting a supernatant with an agent which yields a detectable product when
acted upon by the secreted enzyme and determining the level of the detectable
product in the sample, wherein the supernatant comprises growth media from which
the cells have been removed. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may comprise a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The method may further comprise introducing a
gene encoding the membrane-bound form of chitobiase into the cells prior to
obtaining the sample of cells. The method may further comprise contacting the
cells with sarkosyl. The method may further comprise contacting the cells with
sarkosyl and NaCl. The method may further comprise contacting the cells with
NaCl. In some versions of the method, the cells are intact. The ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme may be expressed transiently. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
may be expressed stably. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be expressed from
a plasmid. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be endogenous. The ectoenzyme
or secreted enzyme may be exogenous. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be
expressed from an inducible promoter. The determining step may comprise
determining the level of activity of an ectoenzyme. The method may further
comprise preparing a membrane fraction comprising the ectoenzyme. The ectoenzyme
or secreted enzyme may be expressed from a gene encoding the ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme which has been introduced into the genomes of the cells. The
cells may be selected from the group consisting of prokaryotic cells and
eukaryotic cells. The step of determining the level of activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of
measuring the amount of a chemiluminescent product produced from a substrate,
measuring the amount of a fluorescent product produced from a substrate,
measuring the amount of light absorbed by a product produced from a substrate
and measuring a decrease in the amount of a detectable substrate. The product
maybe p-nitrophenol.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for determining the
level of membrane-bound chitobiase gene activity in intact cells, comprising the
steps of introducing a nucleic acid encoding the membrane-bound chitobiase into
a cell population and contacting the cells with a chitobiase substrate.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a gene construct comprising a
heterologous promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The portion of the nucleic acid encoding a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase comprises a signal sequence from a gene other
than the chitobiase gene.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a cell into which a gene encoding
a membrane-bound form of chitobiase has been introduced. The portion of the
nucleic acid encoding the membrane-bound chitobiase signal sequence may be
heterologous. The gene encoding membrane-bound chitobiase may be introduced into
the genome of the cell.
Another embodiment of the present is a method for characterizing a promoter
comprising providing a construct comprising the promoter operably linked to a
nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound form of chitobiase, introducing the
construct into host cells, and identifying sequences in the promoter which
regulate transcription levels. The nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound form
of chitobiase encodes a membrane-bound form of chitobiase may be obtained from
an organism selected from the group consisting of Alteromonas sp. 0-7,
Arabidopsis thaliana, Bacillus subtilis, Bombyx mori, Bos taurus, Caenorhabditis
elegans, Candida albicans, Dictyostelium discoideum, Entamoeba histolytica,
Felis catus, Homo sapiens, Korat cats, Lactobacillus casei, Leishmania donovani,
Mus musculus, Pisum sativum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoalteromonas sp. S9,
Rattus norvegicus, Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces plicatus, Streptomyces
thermoviolaceus, Sus scrofa, Trichoderma harzianum, Vibrio furnissii, Vibrio
harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus.
The method of identifying sequences which are involved in regulating
transcription may comprise mutagenizing the promoter. The method of identifying
sequences which are involved in transcription may comprise constructing
deletions in the promoter.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for identifying a
regulatory element capable of modulating transcription within a test nucleic
acid sequence, comprising providing a construct comprising the test nucleic acid
sequence operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase; introducing the construct into host cells and determining the level
of chitobiase activity. The nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase may encode a membrane-bound form of chitobiase obtained from an
organism selected from the group consisting of Alteromonas sp. 0-7, Arabidopsis
thaliana, Bacillus subtilis, Bombyx mori, Bos taurus, Caenorhabditis elegans,
Candida albicans, Dictyostelium discoideum, Entamoeba histolytica, Felis catus,
Homo sapiens, Korat cats, Lactobacillus casei, Leishmania donovani, Mus
musculus, Pisum sativum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoalteromonas sp. S9,
Rattus norvegicus, Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces plicatus, Streptomyces
thermoviolaceus, Sus scrofa, Trichoderma harzianum, Vibrio furnissii, Vibrio
harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus. The construct may be
introduced transiently. The may also be introduced stably. The host cells may be
selected from the group consisting of prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells.
The method may further comprise the step of preparing membrane fractions of the
cells. The step of determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity
may be selected from the group consisting of measuring the amount of a
chemiluminescent product produced from a substrate, measuring the amount of a
fluorescent product produced from a substrate, measuring the amount of light
absorbed by a product produced from a substrate and measuring a decrease in the
amount of a detectable substrate. The product may be p-nitrophenol. The test
nucleic acid sequence may comprise a portion of genomic DNA.
The step of determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity may
comprise determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity after
exposing the host cells to a desired set of environmental conditions. The step
of determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity may comprise
determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity after contacting the
host cells with a compound to be tested for its influence on the level of
transcription from the regulatory element.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method of detecting successful
transformation, comprising the steps of introducing a nucleic acid encoding a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase into host cells and detecting membrane-bound
chitobiase expression in the host cells. The nucleic acid may encode a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase obtained from an organism selected from the
group consisting of Alteromonas sp. 0-7, Arabidopsis thaliana, Bacillus
subtilis, Bombyx mori, Bos taurus, Caenorhabditis elegans, Candida albicans,
Dictyostelium discoideum, Entamoeba histolytica, Felis catus, Homo sapiens,
Korat cats, Lactobacillus casei, Leishmania donovani, Mus musculus, Pisum
sativum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoalteromonas sp. S9, Rattus norvegicus,
Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces plicatus, Streptomyces thermoviolaceus, Sus
scrofa, Trichoderma harzianum, Vibrio furnissii, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio
parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus. The nucleic acid may further comprise a
.lambda. site-specific recombination sequence.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for monitoring the
activity of a promoter comprising providing a construct comprising the promoter
operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound form of chitobiase,
introducing the construct into host cells, and determining the level of
membrane-bound chitobiase activity. The nucleic acid encoding a membrane-bound
form of chitobiase may encode a membrane-bound form of chitobiase obtained from
an organism selected from the group consisting of Alteromonas sp. 0-7,
Arabidopsis thaliana, Bacillus subtilis, Bombyx mori, Bos taurus, Caenorhabditis
elegans, Candida albicans, Dictyostelium discoideum, Entamoeba histolytica,
Felis catus, Homo sapiens, Korat cats, Lactobacillus casei, Leishmania donovani,
Mus musculus, Pisum sativum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoalteromonas sp. S9,
Rattus norvegicus, Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces plicatus, Streptomyces
thermoviolaceus, Sus scrofa, Trichoderma harzianum, Vibrio furnissii, Vibrio
harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus. The reporter gene
construct may be introduced transiently. The reporter gene construct may be
introduced stably. The reporter gene may be incorporated into the genome of the
host cells. The host cells may be selected from the group consisting of
prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells. The method may further comprise the step
of preparing membrane fractions of the host cells. The step of determining the
level of membrane-bound chitobiase activity may be selected from the group
consisting of measuring the amount of a chemiluminescent product produced from a
substrate, determining the level of chitobiase activity comprises measuring the
amount of a fluorescent product produced from a substrate, measuring the amount
of light absorbed by a product produced from a substrate and measuring a
decrease in the amount of a detectable substrate. The product may be
p-nitrophenol. The step of determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase
activity may comprise determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase
activity after exposing the host cells to a desired set of environmental
conditions. The step of determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase
activity may comprise determining the level of membrane-bound chitobiase
activity after contacting the host cells with a compound to be tested for its
influence on the level of transcription from the regulatory element. The
compound may comprise a compound to be tested for activity as a drug.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for determining whether
a test protein is associated with the outer membrane, comprising the steps of:
fractionating a cell population and assaying the fractions for membrane-bound
chitobiase activity and test protein activity, wherein if the test protein and
membrane-bound chitobiase are found in the same fraction, the test protein is a
membrane protein. The test protein may be an antibiotic target.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method of determining whether a
test compound inhibits cellular proliferation comprising contacting a first
population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or a secreted enzyme with the test
compound and comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or the secreted enzyme in
the first population of cells with the activity of the ectoenzyme or the
secreted enzyme in a second population of cells expressing the ectoenzyme or the
secreted enzyme, wherein the second population of cells was not contacted with
the test compound and wherein if the level of activity of the ectoenzyme or the
secreted enzyme in the first population of cells is significantly less than the
level of activity of the ectoenzyme or the secreted enzyme in the second
population of cells, then the test compound inhibits cellular proliferation. The
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis
BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP
endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG
starch utilization protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase,
streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis
serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP,
proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae
neuraminidase, Streptococcus sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase,
Streptococcus mutans exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine
hydrolase, staphylococcal lipases, lysostaphin,
endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease, staphylococcal esterase,
S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus
autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A, staphylokinase and
enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may comprise a membrane-bound
form of chitobiase.
The ectoenzyme secreted enzyme may be endogenous. The method may further
comprise introducing a gene encoding the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme into the
cells prior to comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in
the first population of cells with the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme in a second population of cells.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for identifying a
compound which inhibits cellular proliferation comprising contacting a first
population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme with the
compound wherein the first population of cells has been sensitized by reducing
the level or activity of a gene product required for proliferation and
determining whether the compound inhibits cellular proliferation by detecting
the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. The method may further
comprise contacting a second population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme with the compound wherein the second population of cells has not
been sensitized and comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
in the first population of cells with the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme in the second population of cells, wherein the compound inhibits cellular
proliferation if the level of activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in
the first population of cells is significantly less than the level of activity
of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the second population of cells. The
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis
BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP
endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG
starch utilization protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase,
streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis
serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP,
proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae
neuraminidase, Streptococcus sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase,
Streptococcus mutans exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine
hydrolase, staphylococcal lipases, lysostaphin,
endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease, staphylococcal esterase,
S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus
autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A, staphylokinase and
enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may comprise a membrane-bound
form of chitobiase. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be endogenous.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a compound identified using the
method of the preceding paragraph.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for identifying a
compound which reduces the activity or level of a gene product required for
proliferation of a microorganism wherein the activity or expression of the gene
product is inhibited by an antisense nucleic acid, the method comprising the
steps of (a) expressing a sublethal level of an antisense nucleic acid
complementary to a nucleic acid encoding the gene product in a first population
of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme to reduce the activity or
amount of the gene product in the cells, thereby producing sensitized cells (b)
contacting the sensitized cells with a compound and (c) determining whether the
compound alters cellular proliferation by measuring the level of activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. The method may further comprise the steps of (d)
contacting a second population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme with the compound and (e) comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or
secreted enzyme in the first population of cells with the activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the second population of cells, wherein the
compound inhibits cellular proliferation if the level or activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the first population of cells is significantly
less than the level or activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the
second population of cells. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected
from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella
(Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric
pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A,
Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein, Haemophilus
influenzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a
peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase
PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme amy be
endogenous. The sensitized cell may contain an introduced gene encoding the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. The first population of cells may be from an
organism selected from the group consisting of Staphylococcus aureus,
Aspergillus fumigatus, Bacillus anthracis, Campylobacter jejuni, Candida
albicans, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatus, Clostridium botulinum,
Cryptococcus neoformans, E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis,
Haemophilus influenzae, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella cholerasuis, Salmonella paratyphi, Salmonella
typhi, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus
pneumoniae, Treponema pallidunm, and Yersinia pestis or any species falling
within the genera of any of the above species. The antisense nucleic acid may be
transcribed from an inducible promoter. The method may further comprise the step
of contacting the first population of cells with a concentration of inducer
which induces the antisense nucleic acid to a sublethal level. The gene product
may be a polypeptide. The gene product may be an RNA.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a compound identified using the
method of the preceding paragraph.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for screening a test
compound for activity against a gene or gene product that is essential for
microbial proliferation, comprising providing a cell containing a gene encoding
a gene product that is essential for microbial proliferation, wherein the cell
further produces an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme sensitizing the cell by
reducing the activity or level of expression of the gene product contacting the
sensitized cell with a test compound and determining whether the test compound
alters cellular proliferation by mesuring the level of ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme activity. The sensitizing step may comprise contacting the cell with an
antisense polynucleotide that inhibits production of the gene product. The
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme activity may be detected by detecting the action
of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme on a substrate. The ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P.
aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer
membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization
protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir,
streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase
PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The sensitizing step may comprise contacting
the cell with an agent which reduces the activity or level of a gene product
required for proliferation or growth of a microorganism. The agent may be a
peptide or polypeptide. The cell may contain a mutation which reduces the
activity or level of the gene product required for proliferation of the cell.
The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be endogenous.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a compound identified using the
method of the preceding paragraph.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for identifying the
biological pathway in which a proliferation-required gene or its gene product
lies, wherein the gene or gene product comprises a gene or gene product whose
activity or expression is inhibited by an antisense nucleic acid, the method
comprising (a) expressing a sublethal level of an antisense nucleic acid which
inhibits the activity or expression of the proliferation-required gene or gene
product in a first population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme (b) contacting the first population of cells with a compound known to
inhibit growth or proliferation of a microorganism, wherein the biological
pathway on which the compound acts is known and (c) determining whether the
compound alters cellular proliferation by measuring the level of activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. The method may further comprise (d) contacting a
second population of cells expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme with the
compound and (e) determining whether the first population of cells has a
significantly greater sensitivity to the compound than the second population of
cells by comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme expressed
by the first and second population of cells. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
may be selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
metalloproteinase, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein,
Haemophilus influMoraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P.
aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer
membrane phospholipase A, enzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir,
streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase
PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be
endogenous.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for determining the
biological pathway on which a test compound acts comprising (a) expressing a
sublethal level of an antisense nucleic acid complementary to a
proliferation-required nucleic acid in a first population of cells expressing an
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme, wherein the activity or expression of the
proliferation-required nucleic acid is inhibited by the antisense nucleic acid
and wherein the biological pathway in which the proliferation-required nucleic
acid or a protein encoded by the proliferation-required polypeptide lies is
known (b) contacting the first population of cells with the test compound and
(c) determining whether the compound alters cellular proliferation by measuring
the level of activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. The method may
further comprise (d) contacting a second population of cells with the test
compound and (e) determining whether the first population of cells has a
significantly greater sensitivity to the test compound that the second
population of cells by comparing the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme expressed by the cell populations. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may
be selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P.
aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer
membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization
protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir,
streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase
PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be
endogenous. The method may further comprise (f) expressing a sublethal level of
a second antisense nucleic acid complementary to a second proliferation-required
nucleic acid in a third population of cells, wherein the second
proliferation-required nucleic acid is in a different biological pathway than
the proliferation-required nucleic acid in step (a) and (g) determining whether
the third cell does not have a significantly greater sensitivity to the test
compound than a cell which does not express the sublethal level of the second
antisense nucleic acid, wherein the test compound is specific for the biological
pathway against which the antisense nucleic acid of step (a) acts if the third
cell does not have significantly greater sensitivity to the test compound.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for manufacturing an
antibiotic comprising the steps of screening one or more candidate compounds to
identify a compound that reduces the activity or level of a gene product
required for proliferation, wherein the effect of the compound on proliferation
is determined by measuring the activity of an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
expressed by the cell and manufacturing the compound so identified. The
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella (Branhamella) Catarrhalis
BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP
endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A, Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG
starch utilization protein, Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase,
streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a peptidase, Lactococcus lactis
serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase PrtH, proteinase PrtP,
proteinase ScpA. S. pneumoniae beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae
neuraminidase, Streptococcus sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase,
Streptococcus mutans exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine
hydrolase, staphylococcal lipases, lysostaphin,
endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease, staphylococcal esterase,
S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus
autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A, staphylokinase and
enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase. The gene product may comprise a gene product whose activity or
expression is inhibited by an antisense nucleic acid. The ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme may be endogenous.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method for identifying nucleic
acids which inhibit cellular proliferation, comprising the steps of transcribing
a first level of a nucleic acid in a first population of cells expressing a gene
encoding an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme and comparing the activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in the first population of cells to the activity
of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme in a second population of cells expressing
the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme, wherein the second population of cells
transcribes the nucleic acid at a lower level than the first population of
cells, or does not transcribe the nucleic acid, wherein the nucleic acid
inhibits proliferation if the activity of the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is
significantly less in the first population of cells than in the second
population of cells. The nucleic acid may be a random genomic fragment. The
nucleic acid may be an antisense nucleic acid. The nucleic acid may be a sense
nucleic acid which encodes a peptide or polypeptide. The peptide or polypeptide
may comprise a peptide or polypeptide that is normally expressed in the cell.
The nucleic acid may encode an RNA comprising an RNA that is normally expressed
inside the cell. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be selected from the
group consisting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase, Moraxella
(Branhamella) Catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase, P. aeruginosa FpvA ferric
pyoverdin receptor, E. coli OmpP endopeptidase, outer membrane phospholipase A,
Bacteriodes thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein, Haemophilus
influenzae phosphomonoesterase, streptococcal protein Sir, streptococcal C5a
peptidase, Lactococcus lactis serine protease NisP, proteinase PrtB, proteinase
PrtH, proteinase PrtP, proteinase ScpA, S. pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, S. pneumoniae neuraminidase, Streptococcus
sobrinus dextranase, Streptococcus suis muramidase, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase, Staphylococcus aureus murine hydrolase, staphylococcal
lipases, lysostaphin, endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, sulfhydryl protease,
staphylococcal esterase, S. aureus nuclease, S. aureus fatty acid modifying
enzyme, chitinase, S. aureus autolysin, hemolysin, DNase, coagulase, protein A,
staphylokinase and enterotoxin. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may bea
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme may be
endogenous. The nucleic acid may be transcribed from an inducible promoter. The
transcribed nucleic acid may be a recombinant nucleic acid that has been
introduced into the first and second populations of cells.
Definitions
As used herein, the term "proliferation" means an increase in the number of
cells with time. By "inhibition of proliferation" is meant that growth,
replication or viability of the microorganism is reduced or eliminated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagram of plasmid pJFK4 comprising the wild type chitobiase (chb)
gene encoding the membrane-bound form of chitobiase, and the E. coli chromosomal
attB site. Restriction sites shown are unique with the exception of SacI of
which there are two sites created by the construction of the plasmid, and NotI,
of which there are two sites flanking the P15A origin. Closed arrows represent
genes and gene orientation, the open box represents the origin of replication
(ori) and the small arrow represents the transcription start site.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the integration of the wild type chb gene
into the E. coli chromosome by site-specific recombination between attB and
attP.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing that cells carrying the integrated wild type
chitobiase gene can be detected with greater sensitivity than turbidity
measurements. Control cells (pLEX5BA) or cells containing the integrated chb
gene (DJKGC4) were stopped for growth, diluted to 0.2 OD.sub.600 serially
diluted and a fluorescent chitobiase substrate was added. Relative fluorescence
units (RFU) were charted after a 2 hour incubation at room temperature.
Fluorescence was clearly detectable above background for cultures calculated to
have an OD.sub.600 of 0.0016 and 0.00032, below detectable limits of common-use
spectrophotometers.
FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the sensitivity of measurement of the growth of E.
coli in a 1536-well microplateby turbidity at OD.sub.600 and chitobiase activity
was determined by measuring release of p-nitrophenol from the substrate PNAG by
monitoring OD.sub.415.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the measurement of E. coli growth ina 1536-well micro
plate using a chitobiase assay in E. coli strain DJKGC4 which contain a
chromosomally integrated, constitutively expressed chitobiase gene. The parental
chitobiase negative E. coli strain of DJKGC4 is MG1655. LB=Luria-Bertani broth;
S=chitobiase substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl N-acetyl .beta.-D-glucosaminide
(MNAG).
FIG. 6 is an E. coli dose response curve to gentamicin. E. coli strain DJKGC4
was inubated with various concentrations of gentamicin for 5 hours in a 1536
well plate in the presence of 100 .mu.M 4-methylumbelliferyl N-acetyl
.beta.-D-glucosaminide (MNAG). After removal of background fluorescence, the
inhibition of cell growth produced by each gentamicin concentration was
calculated by comparison to the fluorescence generated by control cells growing
in the absence of gentamicin.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing that sarkosyl, sodium chloride and the combination of
sarkosyl and sodium chloride increase the sensitivity of detection of cells by
the chitobiase assay. Control E. coli cells (pLEX5BA) or E. coli containing the
integrated chitobiase gene (DJKGC4) were grown in LB medium stopped for growth
with kanamycin, pelleted and resuspended in M9 dilution buffer (M9-DB). Cells
were serially diluted and 100 .mu.l of "Tris MNAG" buffer, supplemented with
NaCl, sarkosyl, both, or neither, was added to each well such that final
concentrations were: 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 50 .mu.M MNAG, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5%
sarkosyl. Data for cells corresponding to the turbidimetric measurement of
OD.sub.600 =0.0018 is plotted after 2 hours of incubation with MNAG.
FIG. 8 is a graph showing sensitive detection of cell growth using the
chitobiase assay. MG1655 E. coli cells transfected with the pJFK4 plasmid were
grown in LB medium to an OD.sub.600 of 0.2-0.3. Cells were diluted into M9 media
(M9 salts supplemented with 0.4% glucose, 0.02 mg/ml uracil, 0.005 mg/ml each of
thymine and thiamine, 1 mM MgSO.sub.4 and 0.1 mM CaCl.sub.2), with or without 1
mM PNAG to a final OD.sub.600 of 0.002. Two hundred .mu.l of each were aliquoted
into a 96 well microtiter plate and OD.sub.405 and OD.sub.600 were read in a
Spectramax plate reader (Molecular Devices) in 5 minute intervals for 14 hours.
Duplicate samples were plotted. OD.sub.405 detects both PNP product and
turbidity, whereas OD.sub.600 detects only turbidity.
FIG. 9 is an IPTG dose response curve in E. coli transformed with an
IPTG-inducible plasmid containing either an antisense clone to the E. coli
ribosomal protein rplW which is essential for cell proliferation, or an
antisense clone to the elaD gene which is not essential for proliferation.
FIG. 10A is a tetracycline dose response curve in E. coli transfected with an
IPTG-inducible plasmid containing antisense to rplW in the presence of 0.20 or
50 .mu.M IPTG.
FIG. 10B is a tetracycline dose response curve in E. coli transfected with an
IPTG-inducible plasmid containing antisense to elaD in the presence of 0, 20 or
50 .mu.M IPTG.
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the fold increase in tetracycline sensitivity of E.
coli transfected with antisense clones to essential ribosomal proteins L23
(ASrplW) and L7/L12 and L10 (ASrplLrplJ). Antisense clones to genes known not to
be involved in protein synthesis (atpB/E, visC, elaD, yohH) are much less
sensitive to tetracycline.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention relates to the use of ectoenzymes or secreted enzymes to
measure microbial proliferation. By the term "ectoenzyme" is meant any enzyme
which is associated with a cell either covalently or non-covalently such that
its active site is available to compounds which are on the exterior of the cell.
In a preferred embodiment, these ectoenzymes are membrane-bound proteins. Some
ectoenzymes are attached to the cell wall (Navarre et al., Microbiol. Mol. Biol.
Rev. 63:174-229, 1999). In another embodiment, the ectoenzyme is linked to the
bacterial cell wall through another molecule, such as the protein encoded by the
srtA gene of Gram-positive bacteria (Mazmanian et al., Science 285:760-763,
1999). Secreted enzymes also can be converted into ectoenzymes which are
anchored to the cell wall by addition of an appropriate sequence at their
C-terminus. For example, the C-terminal 35 residues of protein A, comprising an
LPXTG (SEQ ID NO: 1) sequence motif, hydrophobic domain and charged tail
(Navarre et al., supra.) may be linked to the C-terminus of the secreted protein
to link the secreted protein to the cell wall.
Although chitobiase is used as an exemplary ectoenzyme herein, it will be
appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that other ectoenzymes are also
suitable for use in the present invention, including, but not limited to,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa metalloproteinase (Fricke et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
1454:236-250, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety), Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis BRO beta-lactamase (Bootsma et
al., J. Bacteriol 181:5090-5093, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated
by reference in its entirety), P. aeuriginosa FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor
(Schalk et al., Biochemistry 38:9357-9365, 1999, the disclosure of which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety), E. coli OmpP endopeptidase (Striebel
et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 262:832-839, 1999, the disclosure of which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety), outer-membrane phospholipase A
(OMPLA) of Gram-negative bacteria (Dekker, Mol. Microbiol. 35:711-717, 2000, the
disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety), OmpT
endopeptidase of Gram-negative bacteria (Stathopoulos, Membr. Cell Biol. 1:1-8,
1998, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety),
Bacteroides thetaiotamicron susG starch utilization protein (Shipman et al., J.
Bacteriol. 181:7206-7211, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated by
reference in its entirety), Haemophilus influenzae phosphomonoesterase (Reilly
et al., Protein Expr. Purif. 17:401-409, 1999; Reilly et al., J. Bacteriol.
181:6797-6805, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety), streptococcal protein Sir (Stenberg et al., J. Biol. Chem.
269:13458-13464, 1994, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in
its entirety), C5a peptidase genes in group A and B streptococci (Chmouryguina
et al., Infect. Immun. 64:2387-2390, 1996, the disclosure of which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety), Lactococcus lactis nisin serine
protease NisP (van der Meer et al., J. Bacteriol. 175:2578-2588, 1993, the
disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety), proteinases
PrtB, PrtH, PrtP, ScpA (Siezen, Multi-domain, cell-envelope proteinases of
lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 76:139-155, 1999, the disclosure
of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety); Streptococcus mutans
dextranase (Igarashi, Microbiol. Immunol. 36:969-976, 1992, the disclosure of
which is incorporated by reference in its entirety), Streptococcus pneumoniae
beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (Clarke et al., J. Biol. Chem. 270:8805-8814, 1995,
the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety), S.
penumoniae neuraminidase (Infect. Immun. 62:3688-3695, 1995, the disclosure of
which is incorporated by reference in its entirety), Streptococcus sobrinus
dextranase (J. Bacteriol. 176:3839-3850. 1994, the disclosure of which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety) and Streptococcus suis muramidase
(Infect. Immun. 60:2361-2367, the disclosure of which is incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Methods for measuring the activity of these
ectoenzymes are described in these references, the disclosures of which are
incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Accordingly, the ectoenzyme may be an endogenous ectoenzyme or an exogenous
ectoenzyme introduced using genetic engineering methods. It will also be
appreciated that ectoenzymes other than chitobiase may be substituted for
chitobiase in each of the embodiments discussed below. In some embodiments, the
enzyme is a bacterial ectoenzyme. In other embodiments, the ectoenzyme is a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The membrane-bound form of chitobiase may be
the native form of chitobiase or may be generated, for example, via genetic
engineering or microbial selection techniques. Chitobiase normally has its own
signal peptide which directs it to the cell membrane. However, in another
embodiment, DNA encoding the native signal sequence of chitobiase may be
exchanged for DNA encoding a heterologous signal peptide. Those in the art will
further appreciate that almost any enzyme could be expressed as an ectoenzyme by
addition of appropriate signal sequences to ensure its secretion and the
appropriate anchoring sequence such as a membrane anchor or cell wall attachment
signal to ensure that at least a portion of the enzyme extends into the
extracellular milieu. Such signal sequences, membrane anchors and cell wall
attachment signals are familiar to those skilled in the art.
In addition to ectoenzymes, secreted enzymes may also be used in each of the
embodiments discussed below. Secreted enzymes are enzymes which are secreted
into the medium or environment in which the cells are growing. The secreted
enzyme may be an endogenous enzyme or an exogenous enzyme introduced using
genetic engineering methods. Secreted enzymes suitable for use in the methods
described below include, but are not limited to, Streptococcus mutans
exo-beta-D-fructosidase (Igarashi, Microbiol. Immunol. 36:643-647, 1992, the
disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety);
Staphylococcus aureus murein hydrolase (Groicher et al., J. Bacteriol
182:1794-1801, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety); Staphylococcal lipases (Gotz et al., Chem. Phys. Lipids 93:15-25,
1998, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety);
staphylolytic glycylglycine (lysostaphin), endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase
(hexosaminidase) and sulfhydryl protease (Bunn et al., FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
165:123-127, 1998, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety); staphylococci ester hydrolyzing enzymes (Talon et al., Int. J. food
Microbiol. 36:207-214, 1997, the disclosure of which is incorporated by
reference in its entirety); S. aureus nucleases A and B (Suciu et al., Mol.
Microbiol. 21:181-195, 1996, the disclosure of which is incorporated by
reference in its entirety), S. aureus fatty acid modifying enzyme (FAME)
(Chamberlain et al., J. Med. Microbiol. 44:125-129, 1996, the disclosure of
which is incorporated by reference in its entirety); bacterial chitinases
(Hayashi et al., Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59:1981-1982, 1995, the disclosure
of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety); S. aureus autolysin
(Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:285-289, 1995, the disclosure of which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety) and alpha- and beta-hemolysins,
DNase, coagulase, protein A, proteases, lipase, staphylokinase and enterotoxin A
of S. aureus (Giraudo et al., Can. J. Microbiol. 40:677-681, 1994, the
disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety). Methods for
measuring the activity of these secreted enzymes are described in these
references, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in
their entireties.
The secreted enzymes may be naturally-occurring. Alternatively, an enzyme which
is not naturally secreted can be made into a secreted protein by insertion into
a secretion vector adjacent to a signal sequence which will direct its
secretion. Secretion vectors are used routinely in the art to generate a
secreted form of a desired protein. The signal sequence fused to a coding region
of a protein of interest will function regardless of the coding region to which
it is fused. Secretion vectors are described by Murphy et al. (Protein Expr.
Purif. 4:349-357, 1993; Sivaprasadarao et al., Biochem. J. 296:209-215, 1993,
the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety). A number
of secretion vectors are commercially available. For example, Invitrogen
(Carlsbad, Calif.) sells secretion vectors for use in a variety of host cells.
One such vector is the pBAD/gIII kit which is designed to express recombinant
proteins in E. coli. In this vector, the leader peptide from the bacteriophage
fd gene III protein (gIII) directs the secretion of the polypeptide encoded by
any adjacent sequence into the periplasmic space. pSecTag2 and pSecTag2/Hygro
(Invitrogen) are secretion vectors for use in mammalian host cells in which a
mouse secretion signal directs secretion of the polypeptide encoded by any
adjacent sequence.
Ectoenzymes, particularly membrane-bound chitobiase, or secreted enzymes, may be
used for monitoring proliferation of bacterial cells, plant cells, mammalian
cells and other cell types. A genetic construct comprising a nucleic acid
encoding an ectoenzyme or a non-secreted enzyme adjacent a signal sequence is
introduced into a population of cells, and the number of cells in the population
is determined by measurement of ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme activity using
substrates which result in a detectable product, such as a colored product,
fluorescent product or luminescent product. In some embodiments of the present
invention, the proliferation of cells which have been contacted with a compound
is compared to the proliferation of cells which were not contacted with the
compound to determine whether the compound affects proliferation of the cells.
In some embodiments, the cells are sensitized as discussed below. In one
embodiment, the ectoenzyme is chitobiase.
Chitobiase is one of two enzymes that hydrolyze chitin, an abundant insoluble
polysaccharide, to its monomeric unit, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNac). Chitobiase
is known to be present in a number of organisms. For example, the chitobiase
enzyme is known to be present in various genera including Arabidopsis, Bacillus,
Bombyx, Bos, Caenorhabditis, Candida, Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, Felis, Homo,
Korat, Lactobacillus, Leishmania, Mus, Pisum, Porphyromonas, Pseudoalteromonas,
Rattus, Serratia, Streptomyces, Sus, Trichoderma, and Vibrio. Specific examples
of organisms known to contain chitobiase include Alteromonas sp. 0-7,
Arabidopsis thaliana, Bacillus subtilis, Bombyx mori, Bos taurus, Caenorhabditis
elegans, Candida albicans, Dictyostelium discoideum, Entamoeba histolytica,
Felis catus, Homo sapiens, Korat cats, Lactobacillus casei, Leishmania donovani,
Mus musculus, Pisum sativum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudoalteromonas sp. S9,
Rattus norvegicus, Serratia marcescens, Streptomyces plicatus, Streptomyces
thermoviolaceus, Sus scrofa, Trichoderma harzianum, Vibrio furnissii, Vibrio
harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus.
One source of chitobiase is the marine bacterium, Vibrio harveyi. Escherichia
coli cells harboring a plasmid carrying the chb gene from Vibrio harveyi were
reported to produce the enzyme, which was found to be associated with the outer
membrane of the bacterial cells (Jannatipour et al., J. Bacteriol.
169:3785-3791, 1987; Soto-Gil et al., J. Biol Chem. 264:14778-14782. 1989; both
of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties). Replacement
of the first 22 amino acids of prechitobiase with the first 21 amino acids of
lacZ from pUC19 resulted in a soluble chimeric protein with chitobiase activity
which remained in the cytoplasm. This soluble chitobiase has been used as a
reporter enzyme in toluene-solubilized cells (Jannatipour et al., supra.). The
complete nucleotide and amino acid sequences of membrane-bound chitobiase from
V. harveyi is shown in SEQ ID NOS: 2 (endogenous chitobiase promoter and coding
sequence) and SEQ ID NO: 3 (amino acid sequence of membrane-bound chitobiase).
However, it will be appreciated that chitobiase from other organisms may also be
used.
An advantage of the assays for measuring the activity of ectoenzymes, such as
membrane-bound chitobiase, or of secreted enzymes, is that the cells need not be
permeabilized prior to the assay. The ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme substrate
may be added directly to intact cells. In addition, in the case of secreted
enzymes, the substrate may also be added to the medium in which the cells are
growing or to a supernatant obtained by removing the cells from the growth
medium. Thus, the assay may be a "homogeneous assay" in which washing steps are
not required. Standard permeabilization techniques such as sonication,
freeze-thaw, treatment with organic compounds and detergent lysis are
time-consuming and can inhibit enzyme activity. The absence of cell lysis and
washing procedures significantly increases the sensitivity of the assay. In
addition, assays performed in the absence of detergent are easier to automate
such as for high throughput screening, and assays performed in intact cells
allow real time determination of cell number in growing cultures which are
difficult to perform in permeabilized cells. In particular, the membrane-bound
chitobiase assay described herein is extremely sensitive, facilitating
miniaturization and automation of the assay because large numbers of cells are
not required.
The present invention also relates to various protein expression vectors that
can be used to express membrane-bound chitobiase. The structure of a construct
encoding an ectoenzyme, such as a membrane-bound form of chitobiase, or a
secreted enzyme, will vary according to its purposes. The constructs are
prepared according to standard techniques of molecular biology well known in the
art. When the construct is a vector, the vector may integrate the gene encoding
the ectoenzyme into the host's genome or may be extrachromosomal, such as a
plasmid. Extrachromosomal constructs can contain an origin of replication with
activity in the host cell of interest. This feature provides the ability to
replicate within the host cell in which it has been introduced. When integration
of the gene encoding the ectoenzyme is a desired result, the construct may
contain sequences that will facilitate incorporation. Constructs may also
contain a promoter for expressing the gene encoding an ectoenzyme, a multiple
cloning site, and a selectable marker. The promoter may be a heterologous
promoter from a gene other than the ectoenzyme gene or may be the natural
promoter from the gene encoding the ectoenzyme. Constructs for use in eukaryotic
cells may also contain a polyA site adjacent to the gene encoding the ectoenzyme
or secreted enzyme.
One example of integration sequences that can be included in a construct
encoding the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme is the .lambda. attP site. This site
permits a single copy of the gene encoding the ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme to
be incorporated into a host bacterial genome. Integration-promoting sequences
with utility in mammalian cells include the long terminal repeats found in
retroviral genomes. These sequences promote viral genome integration in a host
genome and have been used extensively by those of skill in the art to promote
the integration of exogenous sequences in mammalian host cells.
In some preferred embodiments, the gene encoding the ectoenzyme, such as
membrane-bound chitobiase, or secreted enzyme, is operably linked to a
constitutive promoter for obtaining constant gene expression. In other
embodiments, the gene encoding the ectoenzyme, such as membrane-bound
chitobiase, or secreted enzyme, is operably linked to an inducible promoter for
providing variable levels of expression. In further embodiments, the gene
encoding the ectoenzyme, such as membrane-bound chitobiase, or secreted enzyme,
is operably linked to a tissue-specific promoter for obtaining gene expression
in particular cell and tissue types. Such promoters are well known in the art.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a kit. One aspect of this
embodiment includes a construct encoding an ectoenzyme such as membrane-bound
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme. In some embodiments, the construct also
contains a multiple cloning site containing a variety of restriction
endonuclease cutting sites that facilitate the introduction of exogenous DNA
into the construct. The kit embodiment of the present invention also includes
those components necessary to assay for ectoenzyme activity or secreted enzyme
activity produced by the gene construct. For example, in one embodiment where
the ectoenzyme is membrane-bound chitobiase, the kit will include a supply of a
suitable chitobiase substrate whose metabolism into product by the enzyme can be
assayed.
The constructs encoding an ectoenzyme, such as a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, may be introduced into prokaryotic or
eukaryotic cells. A variety of methods are available to introduce constructs
encoding ectoenzymes, such as membrane-bound chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme,
into prokaryotic cells. For example, the constructs may be introduced into
bacteria using calcium chloride transformation, electroporation, or viral
vectors such as the filamentous phages. These and other protocols for
introducing nucleic acids into prokaryotes are well known in the art.
Alternatively, the constructs encoding an ectoenzyme, such as the membrane-bound
form of chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, may be introduced into eukaryotic
cells, including yeast, mammalian, plant, and insect cells. For example, the
sequence encoding an ectoenzyme, such as membrane-bound chitobiase, or a
secreted enzyme, may be inserted into a yeast artificial chromosome, a yeast
plasmid, a bovine papilloma virus vector or other extrachromosomal vector, a
retroviral vector, a Ti-plasmid, or a baculovirus vector. A variety of such
vectors are known to those skilled in the art. The vectors may be introduced
into any of the yeast, mammalian, plant, and insect cells familiar to those
skilled in the art.
The introduction of the construct encoding an ectoenzyme, such as chitobiase, or
a secreted enzyme, into mammalian cells can likewise utilize a number of
transfection protocols well known to those of skill in the art. As discussed
above, transfections can be transient or stable. Examples of suitable transfer
protocols include calcium phosphate transfection, DEAE-Dextran, electroporation,
liposome-mediated transfection, and viral transfection. These and other
eukaryotic transformation protocols are well known in the art.
Following introduction of the construct encoding an ectoenzyme, such as
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme into the host cell of interest, the enzymatic
activity of the enzyme is measured. Preferably, the assays are performed on
intact cells expressing the ectoenzyme on the cell surface or secreting the
secreted enzyme into the medium. Ectoenzyme assays may also be performed on cell
membrane fractions produced by methods well known in the art.
Where the ectoenzyme is chitobiase, cellular chitobiase activity can be measured
quantitatively by following the hydrolysis of chitobiase substrates. Examples of
substrates with utility in chitobiase activity assays include
N,N'-diacetylchitobiase (chitobiase),
p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-.beta.-D-glucosaminide (PNAG)(Sigma Chemical, St. Louis,
Mo.), 4-methylumbelliferyl-N-acetyl-.beta.-D-glucosaminide dihydrate (MNAG)
(Fluka), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-N-acetyl-.beta.-D-glucosaminide
(X-Gluc)(Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Mo.). Other substrates are also contemplated
for use in the assays of the present invention.
Products produced by the hydrolysis of the chitobiase substrates are monitored
using various means familiar to those skilled in the art. For example, various
optical means are known to those skilled in the art. One such optical means may
comprise detection of chemiluminescent or fluorescent products released from a
substrate, measuring the amount of light absorbed by a product produced from a
substrate, or measuring a decrease in the amount of a detectable substrate. In
one embodiment, p-nitrophenol is released from the substrate and measured
colorimetrically at 400 nm. In another embodiment, fluorescence excitation and
emission of the fluorescent substrate MNAG is measured at 360 nm and 425 nm,
respectively. Other monitoring methods well known in the art can be used to
quantitate signals produced in the chitobiase assay. These may include use of
radioactive substrates or substrates having radio frequency tags. In another
embodiment, blue/white colony indicator plates are used to monitor enzyme
activity.
In a preferred embodiment, the membrane-bound chitobiase gene construct of the
invention can also be used for measuring cell number. In this embodiment, cells
are transfected with an expression vector encoding membrane-bound chitobiase and
the level of chitobiase activity is assayed on intact cells or cell membrane
preparations. The higher the chitobiase activity, the greater the number of
cells in the sample. If desired, a standard curve may be constructed using known
numbers of cells transfected with the gene encoding membrane-bound chitobiase.
Alternatively, relative measurements of chitobiase activity may be used to
compare cellular proliferation in multiple samples.
Cell number is determined using a chitobiase assay as described herein. In a
preferred embodiment, the level of chitobiase activity in each cell in the cell
population is similar. For example, each cell may contain an identical number of
genes encoding chitobiase in its genome. In some embodiments, the cells may
contain a single copy of a gene encoding chitobiase in its genome.
Alternatively, the cells may each contain a similar or identical number of
multicopy plasmids encoding chitobiase. In some embodiments, the chitobiase
assay is performed on cells which have not been lysed or permeabilized. In other
embodiments, the substrate is placed in contact with cells expressing
membrane-bound chitobiase and chitobiase activity is measured without performing
washing steps.
In another embodiment, cells expressing an ectoenzyme, such as membrane-bound
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, are used in methods for identifying compounds
which inhibit cellular proliferation. A test-cell population, such as a
microbial, plant, fungal or animal cell population., which expresses the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme, is grown in the presence of a candidate compound.
In some embodiments, the candidate compound may be a compound produced using
combinatorial chemical syntheses. A control cell population, such as a
microbial, plant, fungal, or animal cell population, which expresses the
ectoenzyme, such as membrane-bound chitobiase, is grown in the absence of the
candidate compound. Assays are performed on the test-cell population and the
control population to determine the level of ectoenzyme in each population. If
the level of ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme activity in the test-cell population
is significantly less than the level in the control population, the candidate
compound inhibits proliferation and may be used as a drug to inhibit cellular
proliferation. A difference of at least 2, at least 10, at least 20, at least
50, at least 100 or more than 100 fold in the level of ectoenzyme or secreted
enzyme activity in the test cell population relative to the control cell
population may constitute a significant difference for the purposes of
determining whether the compound inhibits proliferation.
In another embodiment, the ability of the cell-based assays to identify
compounds which inhibit proliferation is enhanced by increasing the sensitivity
of cells expressing an ectoenzyme such as membrane-bound chitobiase, or a
secreted enzyme, to potential inhibitors of the target of interest. As discussed
below, the target cells are sensitized by reducing expression or activity of a
proliferation-required gene to the point where the presence or absence of its
function becomes the rate determining step for cellular proliferation.
Bacterial, fungal, plant, or animal cells can all be used with the present
method.
Current cell-based assays used to identify or to characterize compounds for drug
discovery and development frequently depend on detecting the ability of a test
compound to modulate the activity of a target molecule located within a cell or
located on the surface of a cell. Most often such target molecules are proteins
such as enzymes, receptors and the like. However, target molecules may also
include other molecules such as DNAs, lipids, carbohydrates and RNAs including
messenger RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, tRNAs and the like. A number of highly sensitive
cell-based assay methods are available to those of skill in the art to detect
binding and interaction of test compounds with specific target molecules.
However, these methods are generally not highly effective when the test compound
binds to or otherwise interacts with its target molecule with moderate or low
affinity. In addition, the target molecule may not be readily accessible to a
test compound in solution, such as when the target molecule is located inside
the cell or within a cellular compartment such as the periplasm of a bacterial
cell. Thus, current cell-based assay methods are limited in that they are not
effective in identifying or characterizing compounds that interact with their
targets with moderate to low affinity or compounds that interact with targets
that are not readily accessible. The effectiveness of the cell-based assays may
be further augmented by employing an ectoenzyme or a secreted enzyme.
For antibiotic screening using cell based assays, inhibition of growth of
bacterial or fungal cells is commonly detected using turbidity or light
scattering measurements, This is a relatively insensitive method because of the
large number of cells required for detection. The activity of cytoplasmic
enzymes such as .beta.-galactosidase can also be used to measure cell growth,
but this method requires that the cells be lysed or otherwise made permeable to
the substrate. The advantage of using an enzyme over green fluorescent protein
or bioluminescence (PCT WO99/14311, incorporated herein by reference) is that
the catalytic activity of an enzyme produces a much greater and amplified signal
for detection.
The cell-based assay methods using cells expressing an ectoenzyme, such as a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, have substantial
advantages over current cell-based assays when used in a context in which the
level or activity of at least one proliferation-required gene product (the
target molecule) has been specifically reduced to the point where the presence
or absence of its function becomes a rate-determining step for cellular
proliferation. Bacterial, fungal, plant, or animal cells can all be used with
the present method. Such sensitized cells become much more sensitive to
compounds that are active against the affected target molecule. Thus, cell-based
assays using cells expressing an ectoenzyme, such as a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, are capable of detecting compounds exhibiting
low or moderate potency against the target molecule of interest because such
compounds are substantially more potent on sensitized cells than on
non-sensitized cells. The effect may be such that a test compound may be two to
several times more potent, at least 10 times more potent, at least 20 times more
potent, at least 50 times more potent, or even at least 100 times more potent
when tested on the sensitized cells as compared to the non-sensitized cells.
Due in part to the increased appearance of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic
microorganisms and to the significant side-effects associated with some
currently used antibiotics, novel antibiotics acting at new targets are highly
sought after in the art. Yet, another limitation in the current art related to
cell-based assays is the problem of repeatedly identifying hits against the same
kinds of target molecules in the same limited set of biological pathways. This
may occur when compounds acting at such new targets are discarded, ignored or
fail to be detected because compounds acting at the "old" targets are
encountered more frequently and are more potent than compounds acting at the new
targets. As a result, the majority of antibiotics in use currently interact with
a relatively small number of target molecules within an even more limited set of
biological pathways.
The use of sensitized cells of the current invention which express an ectoenzyme
or secreted enzyme provides a solution to the above problem in two ways. First,
desired compounds acting at a target of interest, whether a new target or a
previously known but poorly exploited target, can now be detected above the
"noise" of compounds acting at the "old" targets due to the specific and
substantial increase in potency of such desired compounds when tested on the
sensitized cells of the current invention. Second, the methods used to sensitize
cells to compounds acting at a target of interest may also sensitize these cells
to compounds acting at other target molecules within the same biological
pathway. For example, expression of an antisense molecule to a gene encoding a
ribosomal protein is expected to sensitize the cell to compounds acting at that
ribosomal protein and may also sensitize the cells to compounds acting at any of
the ribosomal components (proteins or rRNA) or even to compounds acting at any
target which is part of the protein synthesis pathway. Thus an important
advantage of the present invention is the ability to reveal new targets and
pathways that were previously not readily accessible to drug discovery methods.
Sensitized cells of the present invention are prepared by reducing the activity
or level of a target molecule. The target molecule may be a gene product, such
as an RNA or polypeptide produced from the proliferation-required nucleic acids
described herein. Alternatively, the target may be a gene product such as an RNA
or polypeptide which is produced from a sequence within the same operon as the
proliferation-required nucleic acids described herein. In addition, the target
may be an RNA or polypeptide in the same biological pathway as the
proliferation-required nucleic acids described herein. Such biological pathways
include, but are not limited to, enzymatic, biochemical and metabolic pathways
as well as pathways involved in the production of cellular structures such the
cell wall. In addition, the sensitized cells contain a gene encoding a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase. The gene encoding an ectoenzyme, such as a
membrane-bound form of chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, may be on a chromosome
or in an extrachromosomal vector.
Current methods employed in the arts of medicinal and combinatorial chemistries
are able to make use of structure-activity relationship information derived from
testing compounds in various biological assays including direct binding assays
and cell-based assays. Occasionally compounds are directly identified in such
assays that are sufficiently potent to be developed as drugs. More often,
initial hit compounds exhibit moderate or low potency. Once a hit compound is
identified with low or moderate potency, directed libraries of compounds are
synthesized and tested in order to identify more potent leads. Generally these
directed libraries are combinatorial chemical libraries consisting of compounds
with structures related to the hit compound but containing systematic variations
including additions, subtractions and substitutions of various structural
features. When tested for activity against the target molecule, structural
features are identified that either alone or in combination with other features
enhance or reduce activity. This information is used to design subsequent
directed libraries containing compounds with enhanced activity against the
target molecule. After one or several iterations of this process, compounds with
substantially increased activity against the target molecule are identified and
may be further developed as drugs. This process is facilitated by use of the
sensitized cells expressing an ectoenzyme, such as a membrane-bound form of
chitobiase, or a secreted enzyme, since compounds acting at the selected targets
exhibit increased potency in such cell-based assays, thus; more compounds can
now be characterized providing more useful information than would be obtained
otherwise.
Thus, it is now possible using cell-based assays of the present invention to
identify or characterize compounds that previously would not have been readily
identified or characterized including compounds that act at targets that
previously were not readily exploited using cell-based assays. The process of
evolving potent drug leads from initial hit compounds is also substantially
improved by the cell-based assays of the present invention because, for the same
number of test compounds, more structure-function relationship information is
likely to be revealed.
The method of sensitizing a cell entails selecting a suitable gene or operon. A
suitable gene or operon is one whose expression is required for the
proliferation of the cell to be sensitized. The next step is to introduce an
antisense RNA capable of hybridizing to the suitable gene or operon or to the
RNA encoded by the suitable gene or operon into the cells to be sensitized.
Introduction of the antisense RNA can be in the form of an expression vector in
which antisense RNA is produced under the control of an inducible promoter. The
amount of antisense RNA produced is regulated by varying the inducer
concentration to which the cell is exposed and thereby varying the activity of
the promoter driving transcription of the antisense RNA. Thus, cells are
sensitized by exposing them to an inducer concentration that results in a
sub-lethal level of antisense RNA expression.
In some embodiments of the cell-based assays described herein, sensitized cells
expressing an ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme are contacted with compounds to be
tested for the ability to inhibit proliferation. Preferably, a large number of
compounds are tested for the ability to inhibit proliferation. For example, the
test compounds may be generated using combinatorial chemistry or may be a
library of naturally occuring compounds. The ability of the test compounds to
inhibit proliferation is determined by measuring the level of activity of the
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme. Those compounds which result in reduced levels of
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme activity are then tested for their specificity for
the proliferation-required gene product whose level or activity was reduced in
the sensitized cell by comparing the level of ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme
activity in sensitized cells contacted with the compound to the level of
ectoenzyme or secreted enzyme activity in unsensitized cells contacted with the
compound. If the level of enzyme activity in sensitized cells is significantly
lower than the level of activity in unsensitized cells, the compound is acting
on the proliferation-required gene product whose level or activity was reduced
in the sensitized cells or a gene product which lies in the same biological
pathway as the proliferation-required gene product whose level or activity was
reduced in the sensitized cells. Thus, in this method, a large number of
compounds is initially screened to identify those compounds that inhibit
proliferation and subsequently the inhibitory compounds are screened to identify
those which act on the gene product whose level or activity was reduced in the
sensitized cells or a gene product in the same biological pathway as the gene
product whose level or activity was reduced.
Alternatively, a large number of compounds can be intially screened for the
ability to inhibit the proliferation of unsensitized cells and those compounds
which inhibit proliferation can be further screened by comparing their effect on
sensitized and unsensitized cells as described above.
In another embodiment, rather than first contacting sensitized cells with test
compounds to identify those compounds which inhibit proliferation and
subsequently testing the inhibitory compounds on both sensitized and
unsensitized cells, both sensitized and unsensitized cells are initially
contacted with a large number of compounds and those compounds which act on a
gene product whose level or activity was reduced in sensitized cells or a gene
product in the same biological pathway as the proliferation-required gene
product whose level or activity was reduced are identified by comparing the
effects of the test compound on the sensitized and unsensitized cells as
described above. Thus, in this method, a single screening step is performed to
identify those compounds which act on the gene product whose level or activity
was reduced or a gene product in the same biological pathway as the gene product
whose level or activity was reduced.
EXAMPLE 1
Construction of Chitobiase Integration Plasmid
pJFK4 (FIG. 1; SEQ ID NO: 4) was constructed by ligating a SacI digested PCR
product containing the wild type (WT) chitobiase promoter and additional 5' open
reading frame (ORE) sequence into the SacI site of a variant of pJMF4
(BioTechniques 25:1030, 1998) which contains a 146 base pair (bp) AseI-SalI
deletion, removing the promoter. Proper orientation of the SacI fragment was
determined by both restriction digest and chitobiase assay. pRSG192 (J. Biol.
Chem. 264:14778, 1989) was used as a template for polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplification using primers 5'-CAAGGTTATCAGCCAGTGAG-3' (SEQ ID NO: 5) and
5'-CCTCTAGAGTCGACCTGCAGGCATTAATGCATGCG-3' (SEQ ID NO: 6) to amplify the 609 bp
product. The variant of pJMF4 was produced by AseI-SalI digestion, blunt end
formation using Klenow polymerase, gel isolation of the 5524 bp fragment and
re-circularization using T4 DNA ligase. This variant is missing the lac promoter
which is present in pJMF4.
EXAMPLE 2
Integration of the Membrane-bound Chitobiase Gene Into the E. coli Chromosome
The WT chitobiase gene in pJFK4, prepared as described in Example 1, was
integrated into the attB site in the E. coli chromosome (FIG. 2). and transduced
to a wild type strain (MG1655) as described previously (BioTechniques, supra.).
Briefly, an E. coli strain containing a plasmid (pLDR8) which expresses
integrase from the .lambda. P.sub.R promoter and contains the .lambda.
cl.sub.857 repressor gene, a kanamycin-resistance gene and a
temperature-sensitive origin of replication. The electroporated cells were
incubated at 42.degree. C. with shaking for 30 min, then moved to 37.degree. C.
for 1 hour, followed by selection on LB agar plates containing 25 .mu.g/ml
chloramphenicol at 42.degree. C. Transformants were screened both for chitobiase
activity and loss of kanamycin resistance, and therefore loss of pLDR8.
Transduction with PI bacteriophage (Zyskind et al., Recombinant DNA Laboratory
Manual, 1992) was used to construct an integrated chitobiase gene in a wild type
E. coli background and to confirm the chromosomal location of the integration.
Co-transduction of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene (carried by
the integration), chitobiase activity and galK (linked to attB) indicated that
all three genes were linked on the chromosome of the DJKGC4 strain.
EXAMPLE 3
Chitobiase Assay
Chitobiase activity is located on the surface of cells which express the gene
encoding the native, membrane-bound protein. Accordingly, chitobiase assays may
be performed on intact cells, lysed cells or cell membrane fractions. Membrane
fractions may be prepared using well known techniques.
Overnight cultures of DJKGC4 and MG1655 containing pLEX5BA (vector control)
(OD.sub.600 =4-6) were grown in LB supplemented with either 25 .mu.g/ml
chloramphenicol or 200 .mu.g/ml carbenicillin, respectively. Cultures were
pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in M9-DB comprising M9 salts
supplemented with 180 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.7) and 100 .mu.g/ml
kanamycin. The kanamycin was added to prevent additional cell growth. The cells
were diluted to an OD.sub.600 of 0.2 in M9-DB, then serially diluted five-fold
in duplicate in a 96 well white microtiter plate (black plates are also
suitable) to a final OD.sub.600 of 0.000064, 100 .mu.l each. The fluorogenic
chitobiase substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-N-acetyl-.beta.-D-glucosamine
dihydrate (MNAG, fluka) (100 .mu.l of 100 .mu.M MNAG), diluted in M9-DB, was
added to the wells for a final concentration of 50 .mu.M. The plate was then
read in an LJL Analyst spectrofluorimeter using an excitation wavelength of 360
nm and an emission wavelength of 425 nm. Readings were performed every 5 minutes
for 2 hours.
The results are shown in FIG. 3 and demonstrate that chitobiase activity can be
detected with simple addition of substrate to whole cells. Two hours after
addition of MNAG, cells resuspended to density equivalent to an OD.sub.600 of
0.00032 can be detected over background. By turbidity, accurate readings below
0.005 are difficult to attain. Thus, simple addition of MNAG to the integrated
chitobiase strain results in at least 15-fold greater sensitivity of detection.
In another embodiment, chitobiase activity is assayed colorimetrically by the
release of p-nitrophenol at 400 nm from the substrate
p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-.beta.-D-glucopyranoside (PNAG), and turbidity is
measured at 550 nm. p-Nitrophenol release is measured immediately at 400 nm with
a molar absorptivity of 1.8.times.10.sup.3 liters mol.sup.- cm.sup.-1. Units are
calculated after subtracting the light scattering factor (1.5.times.OD.sub.550)
from OD.sub.400 of the sample. The normalizing factor of 1.5 was determined
previously by measuring the light scattering ratio of bacteria at OD.sub.400 and
OD.sub.550. One unit of chitobiase activity is the amount of enzyme that
catalyzes the formation of 1 pmol of p-nitrophenol per min at 28.degree. C. For
comparison to Miller units of .beta.-galactosidase (described in Miller, J. H.,
A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold
Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1992)), the units are normalized to 1 ml of culture at
OD.sub.450 =1.
Constructs encoding ectoenzymes other than chitobiase may also be used to
measure cellular proliferation in the methods described herein. For example, the
activities of the ectoenzymes H. influenzae outer membrane phosphomonoesterase
e, SusG an
|