Microbiology Reader
Equipment to run microbiology work automatically

Growth Curves of any strain.
Microbiological calculations.

Microbiology Home
Microbioloy Reader
Growth Curves
Photo Album
Microorganisms
Software
Download
Purchasing
Contact Us

Scientific Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C

 

Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 90 (3), 407-413

Development of a  dynamic continuous-discrete-continuous model describing  the lag phase  of individual bacterial cells

McKellar, R.C.
 

ABSTRACT

Aims: A previous model for adaptation and growth of individual bacterial cells was not dynamic in the lag phase, and could not be used to perform simulations of growth under non-isothermal conditions. The aim of the present study was to advance this model by adding a continuous adaptation step, prior to the discrete step, to form a continuous-discrete-continuous (CDC) model.

Methods and Results: The revised model uses four parameters: N0, intial population; Nmax, maximum population; p0, mean initial individual cell physiological state; SD p0, standard deviation of the distribution of individual physiological states. A truncated normal distribution was used to generate tables of distributions to allow fitting of the CDC model to viable count data for Listeria monocytogenes grown at 5°C to 35°C. The p0 values increased with increasing SD p0 and were, on average, greater than the corresponding population physiological states (h0); p0 and h0 were equivalent for individual cells.

Conclusions: The CDC model has improved the ability to simulate the behaviour of individual bacterial cells by using a physiological state parameter and a distribution function to handle inter-cell variability. The stages of development of this model indicate the importance of physiological state parameters over the population lag concept, and provide a potential approach for making growth models more mechanistic by incorporating actual physiological events.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Individual cell behaviour is important in modelling bacterial growth in foods. The CDC model provides a means of improving existing growth models, and increases the value of mathematical modelling to the food industry.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The use of mathematical functions to describe the growth or death of micro-organisms in food (termed 'predictive microbiology') has expanded considerably over the last decade (McMeekin et al. 1993). The focus has been mainly on the control of food-borne pathogens, and concerted efforts in the UK and USA have resulted in the construction of models based on extensive databases (Buchanan 1993; McClure et al. 1994). The initial process in the development of growth models requires fitting of non-linear functions to viable count data to obtain lag (lambda) and specific growth rate (mu). The most commonly used function for this purpose is the empirical Gompertz equation (Gibson et al. 1988; Willcocx et al. 1993). However, there are a number of problems associated with the use of this function, which include underestimation of mu (Miles et al. 1997), and the requirement for experimental data over the whole growth range (McMeekin et al. 1993; Peleg 1997).

In a series of papers, Baranyi andco-workers (Baranyi et al. 1993; Baranyi and Roberts 1994, 1995) introduced a non-autonomous differential equation to model bacterial growth. This new model attributed the lambda to a shortage of a critical substrate, and proposed an adjustment function to express the actual growth of the culture relative to the potential growth (Baranyi et al. 1993). The lag was then a process of adjustment described by the adjustment function, alpha(t), while the parameter alpha 0 referred to the physiological state of the cells at t=t0 (Baranyi and Roberts 1994, 1995). One of the important outcomes of this model was that the mu and lambda are related as described in equation [1] (Baranyi and Roberts 1994).

 

 

where h0 is a more stable transformation suitable for data fitting (Baranyi and Roberts 1994, 1995).

A heterogeneous population model (HPM) was developed, in which the initial physiological state was embodied in a fraction of the population (G0) which could grow without a lambda. It was shown that the Baranyi parameter h0 was related to G0 by equation [2] (McKellar 1997).

 

 

The Baranyi model also defined the initial physiological state in terms of a fraction of the population (Baranyi and Pin 1999).

It has been stated that future improvements in growth models must account for the behaviour of individual cells (Baranyi 1997). A model has been proposed which took into account the variation in adaptation or lag time of individual cells (Buchanan et al. 1997). More recently, Baranyi described a stochastic model for the lag in which the individual cell lag times were assumed to be identically distributed independent random variables (Baranyi 1998). The Bioscreen, an instrument designed for detecting bacterial growth based on automated turbidimetric measurements, was used to determine time-to-detection (td) values for cells of Listeria monocytogenes innoculated individually into wells (McKellar and Knight 2000). Serial twofold dilutions were used to calculate mu, and individual cell lag times (tL) and a measure of tL variability (SDL) were determined. A discrete-continuous model was then developed in which adaptation of individual cells was represented as discrete events, which, when combined with a continuous logistic growth, accurately described the transition from lag to exponential phase. In another report, a method for the determination of tL based on td was described (Baranyi and Pin 1999). In this study, the authors used the ratio between varying inoculum sizes and detection level of counts to develop an ANOVA protocol to determine mu and the mean physiological state of the inoculum by minimizing the variance ratio.

The present discrete-continuous model (McKellar and Knight 2000) has several limitations. First, discrete events were defined as distributions of tL, and not in terms of the initial physiological state of individual cells. Thus, values for tL must be assigned at t=0 and cannot be varied after the initiation of simulation. Consequently the model is not dynamic in the population lag (lambda). Secondly, it will be necessary to modify the existing model to allow fitting to experimental data. This is not possible at present due to the use of random number generator in the earlier version of the model. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to make further advances to the discrete-continuous model to allow resolution of the above limitations.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Models were developed using ModelMaker© Version 3.0.3 (Cherwell Scientific Publishing Limited, Oxford, UK). Viable count data for L. monocytogenes at 5°C to 35°C were from a previously published study (McKellar 1997). Data were fitted to models with ModelMaker© using Marquardt regression with chi 2 as the measure of deviation.

The new model developed in this study was based on the discrete-continuous model previously published (McKellar and Knight 2000). A continuous adaptation step was added prior to the discrete event to form a continuous-discrete-continuous (CDC) model as described below.

The model consists of three compartments, two representing non-growing (NG) or growing (G) cells, and one (pi) representing an array of values for the initial physiological states of individual cells (i=1, 2, 3,..., N0) (Fig. 1). The solid line represents the 'flow' of cells to the G compartment as they become adapted for growth, and the dotted line represents the influence of the physiological state on this process.

Upon innoculation, cells are initially assigned to the NG compartment and thus, NG(0)=N0. Since the cells have yet to adapt, there are no cells in the G compartment and thus, G(0)=0. Cells in the NG compartment do not grow, thus dNG/dt=0, while cells entering the G compartment start growing immediately with rate mu in response to a logistic function shown in equation [3] (McKellar 1997; McKellar and Knight 2000)

 

 

3">where G is the number of cells in the growing compartment and Nmax is the maximum cell concentration.

At t0, positive values for individual cell physiological states are assigned using a truncated normal distribution:

 

 

4">where p0 is the mean individual cell physiological state, and SDp0 is the standard deviation of p0. In this context, physiological state can be considered equivalent to the 'work to be done' by the cells during adaptation (Robinson et al. 1998). Thus, the remaining 'work to be done' by each cell decreases as a function of mu.

 

 

5">

At each specified time interval, the value of each pi is tested for the relationship: pi <= 0. When this relationship becomes true, a discrete event is initiated which changes the contents of the NG and G compartments as follows:

 

 

6">which represents the instantaneous adaptation of a single cell for growth. Parameters for the complete CDC model are: p0, SDp0, N0 and Nmax.

 

 

 

TABLES AND FIGURES


 

Table  1   Effect of SD p0 on fitting of Listeria monocytogenes growth data from 5°C with the continuous-di...


Table  2   Fitting of Listeria monocytogenes growth data using the CDC model




Fig. 1   Structure of the continuous-discrete-continuous (CDC) model describing the lag phase and expone...




Fig. 2   Output from a simulation using the CDC model where the dotted lines represent six of a total of...




Fig. 3   Output of a simulation for the adaptation and growth of a single cell using the CDC model. h0, ...




Fig. 4   Non-linear regression fit of the CDC model to experimental growth data for Listeria monocytogen...




Fig. 5   Output of a simulation with the extended CDC model showing the influence of temperature cycling...


 

 

 

RESULTS

 

The results of a sample simulation with mu=0·833 (corresponding to 30°C), p0=1·5 and SDp0=0·6 are shown in Fig. 2. The dotted lines represent six of a total of 64 pi values actually simulated in the model; the dashed line represents the log10 of the value in the G compartment (from Fig. 1), and the solid line represents the log10 of NG + G (from Fig. 1). It should be noted that p0 was selected as a positive value and thus, pi values will decrease with time.

As a working hypothesis, p0 was defined in the CDC model as the extent to which stationary phase genes are expressed. Thus, adaptation can be thought of as a time-dependent reduction in the concentration of stationary phase gene products during adaptation to a new growth environment. In the Baranyi model, the physiological state parameter (h0) is defined as a transformation of the initial level of a substance critical for growth which increases with time (Baranyi and Roberts 1994). Since these two definitions appear quite different, it is necessary to compare them.

The relationship between p0 and h0 for a single cell is shown in Fig. 3. The value for the initial pi (or p0 when a single cell is being considered) decreases on a natural log scale to 0 at a time corresponding to the individual cell lag time (tL), giving line 'a', at which point the cell 'reflects back' in response to the discrete adaptation event to form an exponential growth curve (line 'b'). If line 'a' is rotated about the x-axis, line 'c' is obtained (dotted line). This is now reminiscent of the HPM (McKellar 1997), in which the intercept of the line describing the time-dependent value of the G (growing) compartment (here represented as lines 'c' and 'b' combined) with the y-axis denoted the natural log of the initial number of growing cells (G0). Note that when N0=1, G0 must represent < 1 cell when tL > 0 (Fig. 3). G0 is related to h0 by equation [2] and thus, for the special case of a single cell (where ln N0=0), h0=- ln G0. It is obvious from Fig. 3 and the above argument that h0 and p0 are identical for a single cell.

It would be useful to fit the CDC model to existing experimental data. However, the programme cannot optimize parameters using non-linear regression when a random number generator is included in the model. It is possible to work around this problem by removing the random number generator and substituting a series of tables each containing N0 fixed values drawn from a truncated normal distribution with mean=1 and SDp0 between 0·05 and 0·8. Distributions of values for p0 were then obtained by multiplying by the tabulated values. Fitting was achieved by fixing the SDp0 (i.e. selecting one table) and varying the p0; this process must be essentially repeated for each value of SDp0.

Table 1 shows the effect of varying the SDp0 on the fitted value for p0 using data for growth of L. monocytogenes at 5°C. For all fittings, mu was fixed at the optimized value for this temperature which had been determined previously (McKellar 1997). Increasing variability in p0 resulted in larger fitted p0 values. However, fitting was better with larger values as noted by the increasing r 2 and decreasing chi 2. The best fit was taken as SDp0=0·6 with the lowest chi 2.

Table 2 shows the fitting for all seven datasets, with the best SDp0 indicated for each dataset based on chi 2. Optimal values for mu at each temperature were taken from a previous study (McKellar 1997). The best SDp0 values selected ranged from 0·5 to 0·8. p0 values were calculated from each dataset using an average SDp0 of 0·7, and it was noted that the resulting p0 values were larger with four of the datasets than the corresponding values for h0 which were calculated from earlier work using equation [2] (McKellar 1997). Comparison of the mean values for p0 and h0 revealed that the p0 values were generally larger and had greater variability.

Figure 4 shows an example of the fit of the CDC model to L. monocytogenes data at 20°C, with parameter estimates taken from Table 2. The fitted model describes the transition from lag to exponential phase quite well.

In order to simulate dynamic behaviour during individual cell adaptation, mu was defined as a function of temperature, pH and a w. As an example, the Gamma model (teGiffel and Zwietering 1999) was used to describe the effect of the three factors on mu. For this simulation, values for p0 (2·22) and SDp0 (0·7) were the mean values from Table 2, and pH and a w were fixed at 7·0 and 0·996, respectively. A temperature cycle was achieved using equation [7]:

 

 

7">where Tav is the average temperature (7°C), R is the temperature range (6°C) and P is the period (8 h). The resulting output temperature as a function of simulation time is shown in Fig. 5 (broken line).

The effect of cyclic temperature on adaptation and growth of L. monocytogenes is also shown in Fig. 5. The pi (four of a total of 64) are represented by dotted lines, while the log10 of the total cell number (NG + G) is represented by the solid line. Both the simulate pi values and growth show the influence of the varying temperature in a dynamic manner.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

An earlier version of a model to describe the adaptation and growth of individual cells was based on the mean individual cell lag times (tL) and the variability of tL expressed as standard deviation (SDL) obtained from Bioscreen turbidimetric data (McKellar and Knight 2000). This model was limited in that the individual lag times were preset at t0, thus the model was not dynamic in the lag. The revised model described in the present study incorporates a continuous adaptation step prior to the discrete shift from adaptation to exponential growth, and is able to handle non-isothermal conditions. This provides an improvement over existing dynamic models which describe adaptation of homogeneous populations of cells (Alavi et al. 1999).

The new model uses p0 and SDp0 as parameters, so it is necessary to develop the means to estimate these values. It has been assumed that the mean of the individual physiological states is a function of the mean of the individual cell lag times detected by the Bioscreen (Equation [8]).

 

 

8">

The Baranyi model also relates the mean of the individual physiological states to the mean of the individual lag times (Baranyi and Pin 1999). This approach presumes, however, that the rate of adaptation of each cell is equal to mu, and does not take into account any distribution of mu. Further work is necessary to determine if the variability of mu for individual cells is sufficiently great to invalidate the use of equation [8].

Another alternative is to fit experimental viable count data with the CDC model to estimate values for p0 and SDp0. This has been attempted, and while reasonable estimates can be obtained, the influence of the selected SDp0 on p0 makes it difficult to obtain a unique solution for any single dataset. In addition, few datasets have sufficient points over the region of transition from lag to exponential growth and thus slight improvements in r 2 or chi 2 values may have little real meaning. It is also unlikely that stochastic compartmental modelling techniques can be applied to improve fitting, since these approaches are designed to track the movement of 'particles' between compartments separated by location or state (Tolley et al. 1978; Godfrey 1983). In the present system, bacterial cells cannot be directly monitored after the stochastic transition since growth occurs, and it would be impossible to determine which cells had actually adapted and which were the product of subsequent growth. Thus, it appears necessary to develop the means to independently measure initial physiological states, as has previously been been suggested (Baranyi et al. 1995).

As a working hypothesis, it was suggested here that p0 might be a measure of the extent to which an individual cell has expressed stationary phase genes. Thus, during the lag phase, expression of these genes would be down-regulated and the gene products removed. This is analgous with the idea of h0 as the 'work to be done' by the cells in preparation for growth, as proposed by Robinson et al. (1998). Tentative support for this working hypothesis can be found in a recent study by Jordan et al. (1999), working with acid tolerance in Escherichia coli O157:H7. These workers showed that when stationary phase cells (or exponential phase cells in which an acid tolerance response (ATR) had been induced) were reinoculated into fresh medium at neutral pH, a lag phase was induced which closely followed the loss of acid tolerance. Baranyi and Roberts (1994) have defined physiological state as the concentration of a substance critical for growth which increases during the lag phase. This view, and the proposed definition of p0 as described above, appear disparate. However, p0 and h0 were shown to be equivalent for single cells. These two approaches are not incompatible, and it is likely that adaptation during the lag phase actually involves both the synthesis and removal of important cellular constituents.

Results presented here suggest that cells may be unable to initiate growth until specific proteins required for survival in the stationary phase have been removed, and removal of these proteins may reflect the change in p0. The development of improved models will require a more complete understanding of physiological changes occurring during the lag phase. However, at present, our ability to monitor such physiological changes in cell populations, or even single cells, is limited. It was recently reported that expression of stationary phase genes in Salmonella typhimurium under the control of rpoS can be monitored in real-time using a luminescent construct (Thompson et al. 1999). This may provide an opportunity for further research to attempt to link an actual physiological process with parameters representing physiological state.

The present study has also questioned the definition and even the relevance of lambda, the population lag. The Baranyi model defines lambda in terms of the mean physiological state of the inoculum using equation [9] (Baranyi 1998).

 

This approach does not seem to account sufficiently for individual cell variability, which the present study and previous work (McKellar and Knight 2000) have shown to be important, since growth of a culture will be influenced primarily by the first cells to adapt. Thus models describing individual cell behaviour must have an SD parameter. The CDC model does not calculate lambda directly. However, simulated growth curves using independently determined physiological state parameters can be fitted with other non-linear models such as the Gompertz or the HPM (McKellar 1997) to obtain a value for lambda. Knowledge of the value of lambda may be of limited use to modellers anyway if the lambda can be descrbed more accurately in terms of cell physiological states. In fact, the lambda could be considered as an artificial phase of growth, but was traditionally modelled since quantitiation was relatively easy using conventional non-linear regression methods. As pointed out in an earlier work (McKellar 1997), some cells must adapt and commence exponential growth prior to the end of the lambda. Thus, the lambda should not be considered a 'safe' period wherein no important physiological changes have taken place.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Alavi, S.H., Puri, V.M., Knabel, S.J., Mohtar, R.H. & Whiting, R.C. (1999) Development and validation of a dynamic growth model for Listeria monocytogenes in fluid whole milk. Journal of Food Protection 62, 170-176.

• Baranyi, J. (1997) Simple is good as long as it is enough. Food Microbiology 14, 189-192.

• Baranyi, J. (1998) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic concepts of bacterial lag. Journal of Theoretical Biology 192, 403-408.

• Baranyi, J. & Pin, C. (1999) Estimating bacterial growth parameters by means of detection times. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 732-736.

• Baranyi, J. & Roberts, T.A. (1994) A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology 23, 277-294.

• Baranyi, J. & Roberts, T.A. (1995) Mathematics of predictive food microbiology. International Journal of Food Microbiology 26, 199-218.

• Baranyi, J., Roberts, T.A. & McClure, P. (1993) A non-autonomous differential equation to model bacterial growth. Food Microbiology 10, 43-59.

• Baranyi, J., Robinson, T.P., Kaloti, A. & Mackey, B.M. (1995) Predicting growth of Brochothrix thermosphacta at changing temperature. International Journal of Food Microbiology 27, 61-75.

• Buchanan, R.L. (1993) Developing and distributing user-friendly application software. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 12, 251-255.

• Buchanan, R.L., Whiting, R.C. & Damert, W.C. (1997) When is simple good enough: a comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three-phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves. Food Microbiology 14, 313-326.

• Gibson, A.M., Bratchell, N. & Roberts, T.A. (1988) Predicting microbial growth: growth responses of salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by pH, sodium chloride and storage temperature. International Journal of Food Microbiology 6, 155-178.

• Godfrey, K. (1983) Compartmental Models and Their Application. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

• Jordan, K.N., Oxford, L. & O'Byrne, C.P. (1999) Survival of low-pH stress by Escherichia coli O157:H7: Correlation between alterations in the cell envelope and increased acid tolerance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 3048-3055.

• McClure, P.J., Blackburn, C.D. & Cole, M.B. et al. (1994) Modelling the growth, survival and death of microorganisms in foods: the UK food micromodel approach. International Journal of Food Microbiology 23, 265-275.

• McKellar, R.C. (1997) A heterogeneous population model for the analysis of bacterial growth kinetics. International Journal of Food Microbiology 36, 179-186.

• McKellar, R.C. & Knight, K.P. (2000) A combined discrete-continuous model describing the lag phase of Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Food Microbiology 54, 171-180.

• McMeekin, T.A., Olley, J.N., Ross, T. & Ratkowsky, D.A. (1993) Predictive Microbiology: Theory and Application. ed. Sharpe, A.N. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

• Miles, D.W., Ross, T., Olley, J. & McMeekin, T.A. (1997) Development and evaluation of a predictive model for the effect of temperature and water activity on the growth rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. International Journal of Food Microbiology 38, 133-142.

• Peleg, M. (1997) Modeling microbial populations with the original and modified versions of the continuous and discrete logistic equations. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 37, 471-490.

• Robinson, T.P., Ocio, M.J., Kaloti, A. & Mackey, B.M. (1998) The effect of the growth environment on the lag phase of Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Food Microbiology 44, 83-92.

• teGiffel, M.C. & Zwietering, M.H. (1999) Validation of predictive models describing the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. International Journal of Food Microbiology 46, 135-149.

• Thompson, J.M., Stewart, G.S.A.B. & Dodd, C.E.R. (1999) RpoS function in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 monitored in a skim milk model food. Journal of Food Protection 62, 70-72.

• Tolley, H.D., Burdick, D., Manton, K.G. & Stallard, E. (1978) A compartment model approach to the estimation of tumor incidence and growth: investigation of a model of cancer latency. Biometrics 34, 377-389.

• Willocx, F., Mercier, M., Hendrickx, M. & Tobback, P. (1993) Modelling the influence of temperature and carbon dioxide upon the growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Food Microbiology 10, 159-173.

 

 

(Full Text online)

 

 

   Scientific Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C

Agricultural Microbiology
Anaerobic Microbiology
Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Artificial Atmosphere
Bioassay of Antibiotics
Biofilm Microbiology
Bioreactor Technology
Biotechnology
Cell Biology
Clinical Microbiology
Environmental Microbiology
Experiments with Yeast
Fermentation
Food Microbiology
Functional Genomics
Gene Technology
Growth Media Development
Growth Rate and Lag Time
Industrial Microbiology
Medical/Pharmaceutical Field
Microbiological Assay
Microbiological Research
Microbiology of Cosmetics

go to a specific theme...

Military Microbiology
Molecular Microbiology
Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity
Oral Microbiology
Patents
Postantibiotic Studies
Soil Microbiology
Spore Microbiology
Veterinary Microbiology
Waste/Wastewater Treatment
Water Microbiology
Wine Microbiology

 


 

© 2005 Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) | Privacy Statement | P.O. Box 1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland, phone: +358 9 85172920, fax: +358 9 8749481, e-mail: microbiology@bionewsonline.com
 

 

 

Last modified: May 25, 2005