|








| |
Scientific
Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C
Nature Biotechnology, 20, 478 - 483 (01 May 2002)
An array of target-specific screening strains for antibacterial discovery
Joseph A.
DeVito1, Jonathan A. Mills1,
Veronica G. Liu1, Anjana Agarwal1,
Christine F. Sizemore1, Zhongjie Yao1,
Daniel M. Stoughton1, Maria Grazia
Cappiello1, Maria D.F.S. Barbosa1,
Lorie A. Foster1 & David L. Pompliano1,
2
1. Department of
Antimicrobial Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wilmington, DE 19880.
2. GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426.
ABSTRACT
As the global threat of drug- and antibiotic-resistant bacteria continues to
rise, new strategies are required to advance the drug discovery process. This
work describes the construction of an array of Escherichia coli strains
for use in whole-cell screens to identify new antimicrobial compounds. We used
the recombination systems from bacteriophages
and P1
to engineer each strain in the array for low-level expression of a single,
essential gene product, thus making each strain hypersusceptible to specific
inhibitors of that gene target. Screening of nine strains from the array in
parallel against a large chemical library permitted identification of new
inhibitors of bacterial growth. As an example of the target specificity of the
approach, compounds identified in the whole-cell screen for MurA inhibitors were
also found to block the biochemical function of the target when tested in
vitro.
INTRODUCTION
The development of a new antibiotic is ultimately a futile endeavor1.
Because bacteria are formidably adaptive organisms, heritable resistance will
always evolve with time and selection pressure from antibiotic exposure2.
Ironically, the use of an antibiotic leads to its obsolescence, as the rate of
resistance development is proportional to the frequency of its use1.
Every antibiotic placed into clinical use has engendered resistance,
irrespective of its chemical class or molecular target3. Increased
antibiotic treatment in animal husbandry and fish farming has only accelerated
the selection process4. An evolved resistance phenotype can spread
both clonally, because of improved fitness of the resistant strain, and across
species, as bacteria readily transmit genetic material that encodes resistance
determinants5. As current antibiotic therapy grows increasingly
ineffectual, it is critically important to isolate structurally novel
antibiotics that forestall the emergence of acquired resistance. However, except
for linezolid (an oxazolidinone launched last year that has already encountered
clinical resistance6), no new chemical class of antibiotic has been
introduced into clinical practice for over 30 years. Why has the pharmaceutical
industry failed to produce novel antibiotics7?
All clinically useful antibiotics, including linezolid, were identified
originally as agents that possessed antibacterial activity. Such broad
cell-based screening does not identify the biochemical target of a lead
compound, hindering efforts to optimize the compound on the basis of
structure–activity relationships. To overcome this obstacle, the pharmaceutical
industry changed its antimicrobial discovery approach in the early 1980s from
screening for antibacterial activity to inhibiting specific biochemical targets.
Although this strategy has produced many potent enzyme inhibitors, it has yet to
yield a clinically useful antibiotic8. In fact, the search for a
target-specific inhibitor is a profound challenge. Because slight structural
changes are likely to decrease the exquisite potency of the inhibitor, there is
little room to maneuver when trying to endow the molecule with other desirable
properties, such as permeability, broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, oral
bioavailability, and metabolic stability. Unable to make any progress in the
development process, investigators abandon the inhibitor (and often the target),
along with the chance of producing a new drug. Cycling through this discovery
process one target at a time is inefficient, especially in view of the multitude
of valid essential targets for antibiotic development9, 10.
We report here a different approach to discovering lead compounds that
inhibit specific essential targets, have sufficient pharmaceutical potential,
and, most importantly, have antibacterial activity. In an industrial environment
in which chemistry and development resources are limited, a key aim of any
antibacterial drug discovery program is to identify such a compound quickly.
Merging the ideas of target-based discovery with the techniques of current
bacterial genetics allows a directed, yet inexpensive and technically simple
approach to whole-cell screening.
We engineered an array of bacterial strains to be more sensitive for specific
enzyme inhibitors than for antibacterial activity alone. We achieved this by
first cloning the essential gene for a specific target under control of a highly
regulated promoter on a plasmid. This plasmid then served as the complementing
copy for the essential gene, which was removed from the genome by recombination
using linear DNA transformation. What remained was a bacterial cell in which the
intracellular level of one essential target protein could be adjusted with a
specific inducer. After modulating target concentration in the bacterium, the
strain was screened against a chemical library using growth inhibition as an end
point.
Using this strategy, it is possible to find leads that not only are active
against whole cells but also are specific for a molecular target. Assaying a
large number of modified bacterial strains against the same collection of
compounds permits the compilation of a two-dimensional database in which one can
query the activity of a specific compound for all strains screened. Thus one can
identify compounds with good inhibitory activity against more than one essential
target, so-called multimodal inhibitors. Such compounds would have lower
frequencies of acquired resistance2, 11. Finally, it is feasible to
consider other desirable pharmaceutical properties of the leads (metabolic
stability, toxicity, oral bioavailability, bactericidal mode of action, slow or
fast killing) to determine development priorities. In short, this strategy
allows the assessment of which lead compounds have the best properties to
determine which antibacterial targets are worthy of more intensive biochemical
analysis.
RESULTS
Construction of screening strains. To achieve regulated expression of
essential target genes in E. coli, we deleted the chromosomal copy of the
gene and expressed the complementary copy from the arabinose regulon on a
plasmid (Fig. 1A). As described later, we constructed chromosomal deletions and
allelic exchanges using the generalized recombination system from bacteriophage
(redgam).
When
-redgam
functions are expressed, linear DNA molecules introduced into E. coli are
protected from degradation and serve as substrates for homologous recombination12.
Following allelic exchange, we used the Cre/lox site-specific
recombination system of bacteriophage P1 for removal of selectable markers to
minimize misregulation and polar effects (Fig. 1D). Cre recombinase binds to
specific sequences adjacent to lox sites and removes the intervening DNA
(ref. 13).
Initially we used these phage recombination systems to construct reference
strains for parallel screening. We first converted a defective
-prophage
strain inducible for redgam (DY329) to nad+ by
transformation with appropriately designed linear DNAs generated through PCR
(Fig. 1B). PCR products were synthesized with primers that amplified the nadA
region from a wild-type strain. Selection of nad+ prototrophs
resulted in loss of the proximal Tn10 transposon and its associated
resistance marker, tetA. Replica plating and PCR confirmed loss of
tetracycline resistance (Fig. 1E, lanes 2 and 3). From this strain, the
chromosomal copy of the arabinose regulon (including araB, araA, and
araD, which encode the arabinose-metabolizing enzymes) was deleted from its
normal location at 1.5 min using a similar strategy (unpublished data). Deletion
of the ara regulon is required for uncomplicated regulation by arabinose
when the PBAD promoter is fused to target genes on a plasmid14.
In addition, pcnB, a host gene that controls plasmid copy number of ColE1
origins15, was deleted using similar methods. Thus, we constructed
two ara- E. coli strains (pcnB+ and
pcnB-) to serve as: (i) parent strains for further genetic
manipulations and (ii) reference strains for screening.

To construct target-specific screening strains, we amplified a
kanamycin-resistance gene cassette flanked by loxP sites16, 17
by PCR using primers with long tails ( 50
base pairs). The tails share homology with regions immediately upstream and
downstream of an essential target gene (Fig. 1D). Direct transformation of the
PCR product into cells expressing redgam followed by kanamycin selection
results in replacement of the target gene with the lox2–kan
cassette. When the target is essential for bacterial growth, 100% of the
transformants show the appropriate deletion only if the plasmid copy of the gene
is induced (data not shown). PCR confirmed the location of the allele exchange
on the chromosome (Fig. 1E, lanes 7 and 10).
Using the site-specific recombinase from bacteriophage P1, we removed the
kan cassette from deletion strains. We transiently expressed the P1 Cre
protein (cloned into a low-copy-number, temperature-sensitive plasmid) in cells,
and subsequently eliminated the plasmid by incubation at 37°C. The result was
excision of the antibiotic-resistance marker, leaving a single lox site
in its place13. Replica plating and PCR confirmed loss of kanamycin
resistance (Fig. 1E, lanes 8 and 11).
In the last step before screening, we removed the temperature-sensitive
prophage from each strain.
-
recombinants were selected at 42°C following transformation of a 4 kilobase PCR
fragment generated from an att+ strain (Fig. 1C). PCR (Fig.
1E, lanes 4 and 5) and phage plating (data not shown) confirmed removal of the
cI857 prophage. A partial list of target-specific strains
engineered by this methodology is shown in Table 1.
Characterization of hypersusceptible strains. Reducing expression of
an essential gene should affect a cell's growth characteristics and render it
hypersusceptible to specific inhibitors. As a first test of this hypothesis, we
analyzed the growth rate of the engineered strains in microtiter plates. A
matrix of conditions was developed to monitor the effects of arabinose
concentration, inoculum size, and inhibitor concentration. Results in Figure 2
show that both metG
and fabI
strains were similarly affected by lowering arabinose concentrations. (A
downward arrow ( )
directly preceding a gene name indicates a bacterial strain in which expression
of that gene is under inducible control.) Growth defects appeared as a delayed
escape from lag phase followed by exponential growth comparable to the reference
strain. In fact, doubling times at low and high inducer concentrations were
nearly identical (2.5–3.0 h). At 65
M
arabinose, exponential growth of the
fabI
strain began only after an 8 h delay. In contrast, the
metG
strain showed a similar delay, but at 420
M
arabinose. The conditions necessary to demonstrate significant growth defects
were unique for each strain and required experimental determination (Fig. 2).
At the lowest inducer concentrations, growth rate drops off significantly for
both the metG
and fabI
strains. Doubling time for the
metG
strain increased from 3 h (at 420
M
arabinose) to 5 h at 70
M
arabinose. A nearly identical increase in doubling time was seen for the
fabI
strain (3 h at 65
M, 5 h
at 6.5 M).
For the murA
strain, reducing arabinose did not lengthen the period before exponential growth
until the lowest concentrations of inducer were tested. There was, however, a
slight reduction in growth rate at 1.3 mM arabinose (3.7 h compared with
3 h for the
reference strain). Lag phase was extended only after a tenfold reduction in
inducer concentration. Lowering arabinose concentration to 13
M
affected both lag and exponential growth (as seen for
fabI and
metG).
When cultures were prepared under optimal conditions, none of the engineered
strains were able to grow in the absence of inducer (Fig. 2).
From these data, we chose growth conditions for screening. We tested each
target-specific strain for hypersusceptibility to known antibacterial agents by
monitoring changes in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; Table 2).
murA is the target of the cell wall biosynthesis inhibitor, fosfomycin18.
Arabinose-dependent downregulation of murA shifts the MIC for fosfomycin
at least eightfold to 0.03
g/ml (as
compared with the reference strain). High expression of MurA results in a
>32-fold increase in the fosfomycin MIC (Table 2). Other antibiotics (for
instance, norfloxacin and trimethoprim) do not exhibit such a shift. Likewise,
the fabI
and tufA
strains demonstrate an MIC shift only with their cognate inhibitors: triclosan19
and kirromycin20, respectively. For the
metG
strain, no shift in MIC was detected upon testing the strain against
commercially available inhibitors of bacterial growth (Table 2).
Parallel high-throughput screening (HTS). We screened the reference
strains against a compound library in 96-well microtiter plates using 100
l
Luria–Bertani (LB) broth containing 1% dimethyl sulfoxide at 37°C. Plates were
read by absorbance at 600 nm after overnight incubation. Hits scored positive if
the A600 value was <0.1, and no visible growth could be
detected in a well. Figure 3 shows the results from screening a reference strain
against a minor fraction of compounds from our library. Three compounds from
this set were able to prevent the growth of the E. coli reference strain
(green circles). Upon screening the same set of compounds against the
murA and
metG
strains, we identified the same three compounds (Fig. 3). In addition, four hits
were found that were specific for the
murA
strain (pink triangles). Most striking is the identification of five new hits
specific only to the
metG
strain (orange squares). These compounds were unable to prevent growth of either
the reference strain or the
murA
strain.
Hits from the primary screens were retested for antibacterial activity using
the engineered strains grown under different concentrations of inducer. If a hit
is target-specific, upregulation of the target (by increasing inducer
concentration) should render the bacteria less sensitive to the compound. Data
from such a secondary screen appear in Table 3. We determined the absolute MICs
for five compounds identified as hits in HTS of the
murA
strain. When the screening strain was grown at high inducer concentrations, the
MICs for the compounds increased 16-fold for compound 1, 8-fold for compound 2,
and 6-fold for both compound 3 and compound 4. Only a marginal shift in MIC is
recorded for compound 5. For comparison, fosfomycin shows an increase of
100-fold under these same conditions. No change in the MIC for norfloxacin was
recorded. When tested in an in vitro assay, these five compounds also
inhibited the enzymatic activity of MurA (Table 3). IC50 values for
the compounds ranged from 1.4 to 6.2
M. The
IC50 of fosfomycin is 0.2
M (Table
3).
DISCUSSION
We describe here the development and application of a screening strategy for
antimicrobial drug discovery. This approach combines the attributes of more
traditional discovery approaches21-23 into a simple, efficient, and
high-throughput methodology that incorporates target specificity and
antimicrobial activity into a primary screen. The cornerstone of this approach
is the ability to generate an array of bacterial strains engineered for
low-level expression of a particular essential gene. Each strain is then
screened against a chemical library, using growth inhibition as an end point.
Strain construction was facilitated by the use of the recombination systems
of bacteriophages
and
P1. The
-redgam
system is highly efficient, and allows the use of linear DNA molecules as
recombination substrates24, 25. This avoids cumbersome genetic
manipulations, such as repetitive plasmid cloning steps and the use of
counterselectable markers to resolve recombination intermediates. In fact,
recombination mediated by
-redgam
was highly reliable, often yielding 100% recombination efficiencies (data not
shown). The portability of the redgam prophage was highly advantageous.
It allowed the use of plasmid-based systems for controlled expression of target
genes, providing flexibility with regard to incompatibility groups and
selectable markers.
Removal of the prophage from the chromosome of each engineered strain
prevented
functions from interfering with screening (Fig. 1D). During HTS at 37°C,
expression of
-kil
and other potentially toxic
products should be repressed by the
repressor, cI. Temperature variations can, however, occur in incubators
harboring large numbers of multiwell plates. A 2°C increase in temperature (to
39°C) is known to induce the cI857 temperature-sensitive
allele26. Killing as a result of prophage expression and the
potential of false positives during screening necessitated removal of the
prophage before HTS.
Expression of essential target genes was controlled by the well-characterized
arabinose regulon27. We chose episomal expression of target genes as
a general strategy (Fig. 1A). Fusion of PBAD to coding sequences on
the chromosome was avoided because the majority of bacterial genes are found in
operons. Such a strategy might subject flanking genes to arabinose control and
misregulation, calling into question the specificity of any active compounds
identified during HTS.
Plasmid-based expression has its advantages. Using plasmids not only
precludes interference with expression of neighboring genes, but also provides
an additional level of expression control—either by using plasmids with
different copy numbers or by using mutants in nonessential host genes that alter
plasmid copy number. In fact, the pcnB- host was required to
render murA
hypersusceptible for HTS (Figs 2, 3; Table 2). One drawback of using episomally
expressed genes may be sensitivity to inhibitors of plasmid replication. Such
inhibitors would show up as false positives during HTS, but would be easily
sorted out by secondary testing under high-expression conditions (Table 3). In
addition, inhibitors of plasmid replication would consistently score positive
during the screening of many hypersusceptible strains, and would be easily
identified by a routine analysis of the array HTS database.
As an additional precaution against polar effects and misregulation, we
removed the antibiotic-resistant cassette used for allelic exchange from the
chromosome. Presence of the kan cassette had the potential to alter the
expression of neighboring genes and result in off-target effects. The lox
sites flanking the selectable marker easily prevented such an occurrence: after
recombination by Cre, the kan cassette was removed from the genome,
leaving only the small loxP site (Fig. 1D, E).
Strain characterization before HTS revealed that low arabinose concentrations
extended the time required for cells to initiate exponential growth. One
interpretation of this phenomenon may be related to the concentration of an
essential protein required for bacterial growth. Although a cell is viable under
low-expression conditions, it seems that accumulation of an essential gene
product must reach some critical level for the cell to begin normal growth and
division. At 13
M
arabinose, the fabI
strain required 9 h to attain that level, whereas the
murA
strain required 12 h (Fig. 2). Upon reaching this level, strains maintained
normal growth rates unless expression was further reduced. Gene-specific factors
such as the timing of induction and expression, translation rate and efficiency,
and mRNA and protein stability likely play a role in the observed differences
between strains.
It is precisely this result that permits the parallel screening strategy to
be successful. Compared with the reference strain, an engineered strain in
culture at some low arabinose concentration will require more time to reach
saturating levels because of the limiting amounts of a single essential gene
product. Should even a weak, but specific, inhibitor of that product be present
in the culture medium, the number of active target molecules will be further
reduced and result in a further growth delay. This lack of growth within a fixed
time period (compared with the reference strain cultured under identical
conditions with the same inhibitor) registers as a hit during HTS.
This can be demonstrated with known inhibitors and their targets28, 29.
The murA
strain has increased sensitivity to the specific inhibitor fosfomycin (Table 2).
Inhibitors of the later steps in the cell wall biosynthesis pathway (ampicillin
and bacitracin) did not show increased activity against the
murA
strain. This attests to the specificity and sensitivity of the screening
approach.
HTS of these hypersusceptible strains identified new lead compounds that
would not have been found through traditional cell-based screens (Fig. 3; Table
3). In parallel screening, compounds that inhibit the reference strain are
temporarily excluded. At lower concentrations, these compounds can be rescreened
against the strain array in an attempt to identify their mechanisms of action.
Conversely, the same compounds can be tested against the strain array when each
target is upregulated, scoring resistance as a hit. In fact, retesting the hits
from the murA
screen at higher expression levels shows differences between or within the lead
classes (Table 3). Confirmed by biochemical analysis (Table 3), these results
suggest that preliminary structure–activity relationships may be defined that
can help identify chemically attractive candidates early in the discovery
process.
In addition to well-characterized essential gene targets, new targets
identified through recent advances in genomics and bioinformatics can also be
evaluated by this screening paradigm9. Essentiality testing of gene
targets occurs simultaneously as a strain is engineered for HTS. Any newly
defined essential target can then be screened for inhibitors, even in the
absence of a defined biochemical activity (Table 1).
In summary, the advantages of using a strain array for antibacterial
discovery are that (i) the strategy can be used for any target, including
proteins that are difficult to assay in vitro, (ii) compounds identified
in the screens will have antibacterial activity, (iii) the molecular target of
an inhibitor of a hypersusceptible strain can be inferred or easily confirmed
with a functional assay of the biochemical target, (iv) the screen for each
different target is run with the same format and conditions, thereby
streamlining the HTS process, (v) engineered strains are permanent tools that
can be screened at any time and at low cost, and (vi) data collected from
several screens of various targets may reveal compounds that inhibit more than
one target simultaneously.
Experimental protocol
Reagents. Antibiotics were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). For the purpose of duplicating experiments described in this paper,
compounds 1–5 are available from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (New York, NY).
Bacterial strains and phage. E. coli DH5
was used for plasmid manipulations. Strains N99, MG1655, and W3110 were used as
sources of genomic DNA and as controls in phage plating experiments. E. coli
DY329 (W3110
lacU169,
nadA:Tn10, gal490,
cI857
[cro-bio])
was a gift of Don Court24. It contains a defective
prophage expressing the gam, bet, and exo recombination
functions from the cI857-regulated pL promoter.
cI-
and vir
(gifts of Bob Weisberg) were used to test for the presence and absence of the
defective prophage.
Plasmids. Essential target genes (together with their natural
Shine-Dalgarno signals) were cloned for arabinose-regulated expression into the
vector pBAD18 Cam14 using standard techniques30. The gene
for P1 Cre recombinase (along with its natural promoters, pR2 and pR3) was
amplified from pRH104 (ref. 31) and cloned into a low-copy-number plasmid with a
temperature-sensitive origin of replication (pJDP8).
Linear DNA substrate design and selection of recombinants.
Construction of the nad+ derivative of strain DY329 was
accomplished through PCR of the nadA region on the chromosome of W3110
using the primers 5'-TCCTGCACGACCCACCACTA-3' and 5'-CCGCCTGCCCCTATTGGTAT-3'.
After purification, 100 ng of product was electroporated into E. coli
strain DY329 in which expression of
-redgam
had been induced24. Selection for nad+ prototrophs
and screening for sensitivity to tetracycline were carried out following
standard methods32.
The
prophage was removed by linear DNA transformation of redgam-induced cells
with a 4.1 kb PCR product containing the phage
attachment site, followed by selection at 42°C. Primer sequences for attB
amplification were 5'-CGAACCGTAGGCCGGATAAG-3' and 5'-GGCGAGGTGTCCAG-GTTG-3'.
Temperature-resistant survivors were also tested for phage growth at 37°C (ref.
33) and for biotin prototrophy. The ara– and pcnB– derivatives of
DY329 were constructed using a similar strategy.
Linear DNA substrates for deletion of target genes from the chromosome were
synthesized by PCR using the loxP-kanamycin (loxP-kan)
cassette from pRH43 (ref. 16) as template. The following primers were used: N50-TATCACGAGGCCCTTTCGTCTT-3'
and 5'-N50-TTTTCACCGTCATCACCGAAAC-3', where "N" represents
nucleotides composing the homology arms necessary for recombination. A 2.5 kb
PCR product was generated from loxP-kan using primers with long
tails (approximately 50 bp in length, represented by the curvy lines in Figure
1D) that share sequence homology with the regions of the chromosome flanking a
target gene (also represented by curvy lines). This double-stranded DNA is used
as a substrate for recombination in cells expressing
-redgam
via the homology tails. Kanamycin-resistant transformants are isolated in the
presence of a plasmid containing the complementary copy of the target gene under
arabinose control (Fig. 1B).
The kanamycin-resistant marker was removed by transformation with the
temperature-sensitive Cre plasmid followed by selection on spectinomycin at
34°C. After incubation at 37°C, colonies were replica-plated on LB plates with
and without kanamycin and grown at 37°C overnight. Kanamycin-sensitive colonies
were screened by PCR to demonstrate loss of the marker (Fig. 1E). All
chromosomal rearrangements were screened by PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing
(Fig. 1E). Primer details are available upon request.
Characterization of engineered strains. Growth analysis under
different inducer concentrations was conducted in a Bioscreen C microbiology
reader from Thermo Lab Systems (Helsinki, Finland). Cultures from each strain
were grown overnight in medium containing various concentrations of arabinose.
These served as seed cultures for testing growth in microtiter plates under
different conditions, such as inoculum size and inducer concentration. After
monitoring these and other parameters, culture conditions under which the
strains would become limiting for the essential gene target were determined.
Before screening, mutant strains were also tested for sensitivity to antibiotics
and drugs with known mechanisms of action to assess the target specificity of
each strain. For such experiments, standard MIC determinations were done34.
MurA biochemical assays. The activity of the MurA enzyme was measured
by quantitating the UDP-GlcNAc-dependent release of inorganic phosphate from
phosphoenolpyruvate according to published methods35.
Received 1 February
2002; Accepted 15 February 2002.
REFERENCES
- Monroe, S. & Polk, R. Antimicrobial use and bacterial resistance. Curr.
Opin. Microbiol. 3, 496-501 (2000).
- Silver, L.L. & Bostian, K.A. Discovery and development of new antibiotics:
the problem of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37, 377-383 (1993).
- Davies, J.E. Origins, acquisition and dissemination of antibiotic
resistance determinants. Ciba Found. Symp. 207, 15-27 (1997).
- Witte, W. Selective pressure by antibiotic use in livestock. Int. J.
Antimicrob. Agents 16 Suppl 1, S19-24 (2000).
- Ochman, H., Lawrence, J.G. & Groisman, E.A. Lateral gene transfer and the
nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405, 299-304 (2000).
- Tsiodras, S. et al. Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of
Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 358, 207-208 (2001).
- Pucci, M.J., Dougherty, T.J. & Barrett, J.F. Why are there no new
antibiotics? Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs 7, 1233-1235 (1998).
- Pucci, M.J., Dougherty, T.J. & Barrett, J.F. Targets, targets
everywhere--so, where are the new antibacterial drugs? Curr. Opin.
Antiinfect. Invest. Drugs 2, 123-124 (2000).
- Read, T.D., Gill, S.R., Tettelin, H. & Dougherty, B.A. Finding drug
targets in microbial genomes. Drug Discov. Today 6, 887-892
(2001).
- Arigoni, F. et al. A genome-based approach for the identification
of essential bacterial genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 851-856
(1998).
- Wong, K.K. & Pompliano, D.L. in Resolving the antibiotic paradox:
progress in drug design and resistance. (eds Rosen, B. & Mobashery, S.)
1-21 (Plenum Press, New York; 1999).
- Murphy, K.C. Lambda Gam protein inhibits the helicase and chi-stimulated
recombination activities of Escherichia coli RecBCD enzyme. J.
Bacteriol. 173, 5808-5821 (1991).
- Hoess, R.H., Ziese, M. & Sternberg, N. P1 site-specific recombination:
nucleotide sequence of the recombining sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79, 3398-3402 (1982).
- Guzman, L.M., Belin, D., Carson, M.J. & Beckwith, J. Tight regulation,
modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD
promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121-4130 (1995).
- Lopilato, J., Bortner, S. & Beckwith, J. Mutations in a new chromosomal
gene of Escherichia coli K-12, pcnB, reduce plasmid copy number of
pBR322 and its derivatives. Mol. Gen. Genet. 205, 285-290
(1986).
- Abremski, K., Hoess, R. & Sternberg, N. Studies on the properties of P1
site-specific recombination: evidence for topologically unlinked products
following recombination. Cell 32, 1301-1311 (1983).
- Zhang, Y., Buchholz, F., Muyrers, J.P. & Stewart, A.F. A new logic for DNA
engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet.
20, 123-128 (1998).
- Kim, D.H. et al. Characterization of a Cys115 to Asp substitution
in the Escherichia coli cell wall biosynthetic enzyme UDP-GlcNAc
enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) that confers resistance to inactivation by the
antibiotic fosfomycin. Biochemistry 35, 4923-4928 (1996).
- Heath, R.J., Yu, Y.T., Shapiro, M.A., Olson, E. & Rock, C.O. Broad
spectrum antimicrobial biocides target the FabI component of fatty acid
synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30316-30320 (1998).
- Wolf, H., Chinali, G. & Parmeggiani, A. Kirromycin, an inhibitor of
protein biosynthesis that acts on elongation factor Tu. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 71, 4910-4914 (1974).
- Bostian, K.A. & Schmidt, M.B. in Antibacterial therapy: achievements,
problems, and future perspectives (eds Busse, W.D., Zeiler, H.J. &
Labischinski, H.) 61-68 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1997).
- Schmid, M.B. Novel approaches to the discovery of antimicrobial agents.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 529-534 (1998).
- Trias, J. & Yuan, Z. in Enzyme technologies for pharmaceutical and
biotechnological applications (eds Kirst, H.A., Yeh, W.K. & Zmijewski,
M.J.) 499-511 (Marcel-Dekker, New York; 2001).
- Yu, D. et al. An efficient recombination system for chromosome
engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97, 5978-5983 (2000).
- Murphy, K.C. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to
promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
180, 2063-2071 (1998).
- Roberts, J. & Devoret, R. In Lambda II (eds Hendrix, R.W., Roberts,
J.W., Stahl, F.W. & Weisberg, R.A.) 123-144 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 1983).
- Schleif, R. Regulation of the L-arabinose operon of Escherichia coli.
Trends Genet. 16, 559-565 (2000).
- Apfel, C.M. et al. Peptide deformylase as an antibacterial drug
target: target validation and resistance development. Antimicrob. Agents.
Chemother. 45, 1058-1064 (2001).
- Chen, D.Z. et al. Actinonin, a naturally occurring antibacterial
agent, is a potent deformylase inhibitor. Biochemistry 39,
1256-1262 (2000).
- Sambrook, J., Russel, D.W. & Sambrook, J. Molecular cloning: a
laboratory manual, Edn. 3 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring
Harbor; NY, 2001).
- Sternberg, N., Sauer, B., Hoess, R. & Abremski, K. Bacteriophage P1 cre
gene and its regulatory region. Evidence for multiple promoters and for
regulation by DNA methylation. J. Mol. Biol. 187, 197-212
(1986).
- Miller, J.H. Experiments in molecular genetics (Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 1972).
- Court, D. & Oppenheim, A.B. In Lambda II (eds Hendrix, R.W.,
Roberts, J.W., Stahl, F.W. & Weisberg, R.A.) 251-277 (Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 1983).
- Eliopoulous, G.M. & Moellering Jr., R.C. In Antibiotics in laboratory
medicine (ed. Lorian, V.) 330-396 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD;
1996).
- Marquardt, J.L., Siegele, D.A., Kolter, R. & Walsh, C.T. Cloning and
sequencing of Escherichia coli murZ and purification of its product, a
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase. J. Bacteriol.
174, 5748-5752 (1992).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Michael G. Kurilla for countless helpful insights, to
Janet Kaczmarczyk and Jason Sparkowski for technical aid in the early phases of
this work, to Don Court for strains, to Bob Weisberg for phage, and to Ron Hoess
and Piet DiBoer for plasmids. This work was completed while the authors were
employees of the DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company.
(order Full Text from publisher)
|