|
|
|
Scientific
Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader
International Journal of Food Microbiology,
Volume 57, Issue 3 , 15 June 2000, Pages 169-181
|
|
|
where x0 is the initial bacterial concentration (cfu ml−1)
estimated from the average of two initial enumerations, xmax
is the maximum bacterial concentration (cfu ml−1), x(t)
is the bacterial concentration (cfu ml−1) at time t (h),
max
is the maximum specific growth rate (h−1), and lag is the
lag time (h).
The lag time was estimated as being the average of two values obtained
with two bacterial concentrations in the log phase of growth (Fig. 1).
max
was estimated by applying an exponential model with delay on optical densities
in the range 0 to 0.1 and by correcting the growth rate obtained by a
calibration factor.
For incubation on TSYE agar, cells present on the surface of the agar were collected and suspended in 5 ml of bacto-peptone (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) plus 0.85% sodium chloride (Prolabo, Paris, France) (PS) and appropriate dilutions in PS were plated on TSYE agar plates with a model DS spiral plater (Interscience, St Nom la Bretèche, France). TSYE agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h before enumeration. Growth curves were fitted using the logistic growth model with delay, i.e. with a breakpoint at the transition between the lag and the exponential phase (Kono; Baranyi and Rosso):
![]() |
The model was built for a pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 4.4, 6.3, 7.8, 10.1, 11.9, 14.0, 15.5, 24.0, 30.9, and 35.9°C and an incubation in TSYE broth at 6°C with the strain Scott A. Experiments at each pre-incubation temperature were replicated between two and four times.
As previously reported (Buchanan; Hudson and Dufrenne) the growth rate was
not influenced by pre-incubation conditions, the model was then developed for
the product lag×
max,
called ![]()
.
Whatever the temperature of pre-incubation used, a similar evolution of
![]()
with the duration of the pre-incubation was observed:
![]()
decreased during the lag phase of growth of the inoculum to approximately
0, stayed at this minimal value during the log phase and sometimes the beginning
of the stationary phase and gradually increased during the stationary or death
phase.
The growth (increase in cell number) was assumed to be controlled by a factor
which must attain a critical concentration before cell division occurs and this
factor was assumed to be correlated to the cell biomass (Albertson; Cooper;
Baranyi; Baranyi; Hills and Hills). The biomass was assumed to increase
exponentially during the lag phase with a rate equal to
max
(Koch; Koch; Hills; Baranyi and Hills). Growth is then delayed during the lag
phase until the biomass has reached its critical value. If during the lag phase,
cells are abruptly placed in other incubation conditions, the rate of biomass
changes instantaneously to the new growth rate (Baranyi et al., 1995) and a new
lag time can be defined as the time necessary to increase from the initial
biomass to the critical one. The product
![]()
is then described by the following equation:
|
|
where
i
(h−1) is the maximum specific growth rate of the inoculum at the
temperature Ti (°C), lagi (h) is the lag
time of the inoculum at the temperature Ti, and ti
(h) is the duration of the pre-incubation at the temperature Ti.
During the exponential growth phase (ti>lagi)
of the inoculum the product
![]()
is equal to 0 as the factor controlling the cell division is above its critical
value. This phenomenon was first reported by Penfold (1914).
When the inoculum enters into the stationary phase, the biomass decreases
(Cooper; Matin; Siegele; Kolter; Hills; Hills and Koch), cell division ceases
and the product
![]()
will then increase. When the bacterial cells are starved,
![]()
increases to infinity (Albertson et al., 1990). The beginning of the increase of
![]()
was then assumed to be linked to the entry of the inoculum into the stationary
phase and the rate of increase of
![]()
was assumed to be linked to the maximum specific growth rate of the inoculum. A
square root relationship was found to be suitable to describe the increase of
![]()
with the pre-incubation duration:
|
|
i and
ts (h) depends on the entry into the stationary phase:
| k=f( |
|
|
where f and g are secondary models describing the evolution of k and ts.
The entry into the stationary phase was arbitrarily defined as the intercept between the extrapolated straight line, slope of which is the growth rate, at the lag time and the natural logarithm of the maximum bacterial concentration horizontal asymptote.
As ts can theoretically be lower than lagi,
the global model describing the evolution of the product
![]()
with the pre-incubation duration, ti, at the temperature Ti
is:
|
|
with k=f(
i)
and
.
Fits were performed by linear or non-linear regression using the least squares criterion (Box et al., 1978). Estimation of parameters was carried out by minimizing the sum of the squared residuals (SSR) where SSR is defined as follows:
|
|
where n is the number of data points.
The minimum SSR values were computed with the
and
subroutines of MATLAB 5.2 software (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
The model proposed was built with the strain Scott A with a pre-incubation in liquid medium and an incubation in liquid medium at 6°C. The validity of this model was then checked for other strains, other incubation temperatures, and solid pre-incubation and incubation media.
The conditions tested were:
(i) pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 15.5°C and incubation in TSYE broth at 6°C with strains CLIP 22485, CLIP 19884, 27795, and 925318
(ii) pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 19.6 and 30.9°C, and incubation in TSYE broth at, respectively, 7.8 and 15.5°C
(iii) pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 19.6 and 30.9°C, and incubation on TSYE agar at, respectively, 7.8 and 15.5°C
(iv) pre-incubation on TSYE agar at 19.6 and 15.5°C, and incubation in TSYE broth at, respectively, 6 and 7.8°C.
The validity of the proposed model was also checked with published data obtained for L. monocytogenes.
3. RESULTS
A linear decrease of
![]()
to 0 was effectively observed during the lag phase of the inoculum (Fig.
2). This reinforced the hypothesis of the existence of a critical factor
increasing exponentially during the lag phase.
![]()
Fig. 2. Evolution of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C for inoculated cells in the lag phase cultured in TSYE broth at (a) 11.9°C and (b) 15.5°C.
A linear increase of
![]()
2
with the duration of pre-incubation was effectively observed for inoculated
cells in stationary phase (Fig. 3). The slope of the line, k, increased
with the temperature and then with
i.
The time at which the increase began, ts, decreased with
temperature and was then assumed linked to the entry into the stationary phase.
![]()
Fig. 3. Evolution of the square of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C for inoculated cells in the stationary phase cultured in TSYE broth at (•) 4.4°C, (
) 6.3°C, and (
) 10.1°C.
Plots of estimated k against
i are
shown in Fig. 4. A good linear correlation (linear correlation coefficient of
0.993) between the estimated rates was observed. The constant term of the
regression line was not significantly different from 0 so it was neglected and
the two rates were assumed proportional.
![]()
Fig. 4. Evolution of the rate (k) of increase of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C with the maximum specific growth rate of the inoculum (
i).
Plots of estimated ts against time of entry into the stationary phase are shown in Fig. 5. A linear correlation (coefficient of 0.970) was also observed but the times were not proportional and negative ts were observed for high pre-incubation temperatures corresponding to rapid entries into the stationary phase. Given the small size of the available data set, large magnitude of the 95% confidence intervals were obtained for the estimated parameters.
![]()
Fig. 5. Evolution of the start (ts) of the increase of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C with the time of entry into the stationary phase of the inoculum (tstation).
The global model describing the evolution of
![]()
with the duration ti of the pre-incubation at the temperature
Ti was then:
|
|
with k=0.035·
i
and
Knowing the growth parameters of the inoculum, theoretical evolutions of
![]()
with the duration of pre-incubation were built at different temperatures (Fig.
6). Theoretical values were relatively consistent with the observed ones (Fig.
7) and a root mean square error of 0.61 was obtained for the 172 data points.
![]()
Fig. 6. Evolution of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C with the duration of the pre-incubation at (a) 4.4°C, (b) 6.3°C, (c) 7.8°C, (d) 10.1°C, (e) 11.9°C, (f) 14.0°C, (g) 15.5°C, (h) 24.0°C, (i) 30.9°C, and (j) 35.9°C.
![]()
Fig. 7. Plots of theoretical against observed products lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes in TSYE broth at 6°C.
The validity of the model was checked with four other L. monocytogenes
strains for a pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 15.5°C and an incubation in TSYE
broth at 6°C. The predicted values for
![]()
were consistent with the observed ones (Fig. 8) and a root mean square error of
0.88 was obtained.
![]()
Fig. 8. Plots of predicted against observed products lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes (•) in TSYE broth at 6°C for strains CLIP 22485, CLIP 19884, 27795, and 925318 pre-incubated in TSYE broth at 15.5°C, (
) in TSYE broth at 7.8 and 15.5°C for pre-incubation in TSYE broth at, respectively, 19.6 and 30.9°C, (
) on TSYE agar at 7.8 and 15.5°C for pre-incubation in TSYE broth at, respectively, 19.6 and 30.9°C, (+) in TSYE broth at 6 and 7.8°C for pre-incubation on TSYE agar at, respectively, 19.6 and 15.5°C.
The validity was checked for incubations in TSYE broth at 7.8 and 15.5°C with pre-incubations in TSYE broth at, respectively, 19.6 and 30.9°C. The predicted values obtained were also consistent with the observed ones (Fig. 8) and a root mean square error of 0.51 was obtained.
When the incubation was done on TSYE agar at 8 and 16°C with pre-incubations
in TSYE broth at, respectively, 20 and 30°C, the predicted values for
![]()
were distant from the observed ones (Fig. 8) and a root mean square error of
1.48 was obtained. The observed increase of
![]()
was faster than the predicted one (Fig. 9a).
![]()
Fig. 9. Evolution of the product lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes (a) on TSYE agar at 7.8°C with the duration of the pre-incubation in TSYE broth at 19.6°C, (b) in TSYE broth at 6°C with the duration of the pre-incubation on TSYE agar at 15.5°C.
When the pre-incubation was done on TSYE agar at 15.5 and 19.6°C with
incubations in TSYE broth at, respectively, 6 and 7.8°C, the predicted values
for ![]()
were also distant from the observed ones (Fig. 8) and a root mean square error
of 1.06 was obtained. As for the incubation on solid medium, the observed
increase of
![]()
was faster than the predicted one (Fig. 9b)
For predictions, when the pre-incubation parameters were not specified in the
published studies, the following values were arbitrarily taken: x0=106
cfu ml−1, xmax=109 cfu ml−1,
and lagi and
i set
at the values observed or estimated with the square root model (Ratkowsky and
Zwietering) for the strain Scott A in our experiments.
The proposed model is consistent with the result of George and Lund (1992) who observed no lag phase when cells in the log phase at 20°C were transferred to fresh medium.
Membré et al. (1999) observed no lag phase when L. monocytogenes
cells were cultured at 4 and 7°C for, respectively, 6 and 4 days and then
transferred to fresh medium at 7°C but a lag time of ~31 h was obtained
with a pre-incubation at 37°C for 20 h (![]()
=1.86
with
max
assumed to be 0.06 h−1). The model effectively predicted no lag
phase for pre-incubations at 4 and 7°C and a value of 1.26 for
![]()
was predicted for the pre-incubation at 37°C.
Buchanan and Klawitter (1991) observed an increase of lag phase
duration with increasing pre-incubation temperature. The model predicted an
evolution of the product
![]()
similar to those observed but predicted values were under-estimated (Fig. 10).
This discrepancy is probably due to the transfer to a different medium which
induces a medium-dependent
![]()
component assumed additive.
![]()
Fig. 10. Plots of predicted and observed products lag×
max for regrowth of L. monocytogenes at 5°C against the pre-incubation temperature of the inoculum. (•) and (
) are products lag×
max obtained by Buchanan and Klawitter (1991) in, respectively, aerobic and anaerobic conditions. (+) are predicted products. The durations of the pre-incubations are 144 h at 5°C, 96 h at 10 and 13°C, 48 h at 19°C, 24 h at 28, 37, and 42°C.
The same phenomenon was observed with the results obtained by Walker et al.
(1990), however the predicted
![]()
increase of 1.43 by using a pre-incubation at 30°C for 48 h instead of one at
4°C for 6 days was consistent with the average increase observed of 1.69.
4. DISCUSSION
The root mean square error of the model corresponding to the average error
(Baranyi and Roberts, 1995) in
![]()
estimates is 0.61, i.e. estimated values are on average 0.61 away from the
observed ones. Thus the goodness of fit of the model seems poor but large
measurement errors were observed for
![]()
estimates. Indeed, the standard error observed with 31 estimated
![]()
values for a pre-incubation at 30°C for 24 h was 0.46.
The model proposed for the evolution of the product lag×
max
is consistent with the hypothesis of an exponential accumulation of a critical
substance during the lag phase of which production is instantaneously
adjusted to the new environment temperature. This observation supports the usual
procedure used to calculate lag time for cultures growing under changing
temperatures, which consists of summing lag times for each
time/temperature interval (Smith; Li; Rosso and Wijtzes). Although a positive
history effect was observed for the lag time of Pseudomonas fragi under
temperature transitions between 4°C and 16°C (Fu and Labuza), results obtained
in our study are consistent with those of Li and Torres (1993) and Baranyi et
al. (1995) who observed no history effect during the lag phase. This observation
implies an instantaneous adjustment of the metabolism during the lag
phase.
It is usually assumed that the growth rate of exponentially growing cells adapts instantaneously to changes in temperature but lags induced by temperature shifts-down were frequently observed. For exponentially growing cultures of Salmonella typhimurium,Lark and Maaløe (1954) observed no lag phase by reducing the temperature from 37 to 25°C, but observed a lag by reducing the temperature from 37 to 13 or 10°C. This observation was confirmed with Escherichia coli by Ng et al. (1962) and Jones et al. (1987) who observed a lag before growth resumed when the temperature was shifted from 37 to 10°C. Baranyi et al. (1995) observed no induced lag for exponentially growing cultures of Brochothrix thermosphacta for a temperature shift-down from 17–25°C to 5°C but a significant lag was observed for a shift-down to 3°C. The magnitude of this cold shock response is dependent upon the range of the temperature shift (Gounot and Berry). Thus Li and Torres (1993) observed no induced lag with B. thermosphacta for fluctuating temperatures between 4 and 12°C or 2 and 14°C. The range of the temperature shift inducing a cold shock response is not known for L. monocytogenes, this response has been shown for temperature shift-down from 37 to 5°C (Bayles et al., 1996) or from 25 to 4°C ( Phan-Thanh and Gormon, 1995). The proposed model predicted no nil regrowth lag times for exponentially growing cells at high temperature (Fig. 6). Indeed, for rapid entries into the stationary phase, i.e. high pre-incubation temperatures, ts values are widely negative so the increase of predicted regrowth lag time is observed before the end of the lag phase of the inoculated cells and nil values are not obtained. Nevertheless, as the time of entry in the stationary phase is inoculum-size-dependent, the model can predict nil regrowth lag time for high pre-incubation temperatures when the pre-incubation inoculum (x0) is very small. A refinement of the model could be to model ts as a function of both the entry into the stationary phase and the temperature of pre-incubation (or a linked parameter). However, the modelling of this cold shock response seems difficult because even for pre-incubation temperatures of 30.9 and 35.9°C, nil regrowth lag times were sometimes observed (Fig. 6).
The critical substance responsible for the bacterial division does not seem
to be correlated to the per cell biomass during the stationary phase. Indeed the
per cell biomass decreases before the entry into the stationary phase to attain
its minimal value (Siegele; Kolter and Hills) but nil regrowth lag times
were observed for cells in stationary growth phase for varying durations at low
pre-incubation temperatures. The descriptive term ‘stationary phase’ corresponds
effectively to a period of highly heterogeneous cell physiology (Kolter et al.,
1993). For prolonged starvation, a gradual increase of the product lag×
max
was observed with the starvation duration as it has been previously reported for
Vibrio sp. S14 (Albertson et al., 1990). This increase seemed faster for
pre-incubation or incubation on a solid medium. For pre-incubation on a solid
medium, this observation can be explained by the fact that there is a great
heterogeneity in bacterial colonies and cells at the center of the colonies are
rapidly in starvation conditions because of the restricted nutrient diffusion (
McKay et al., 1997). Contrary to the pre-incubation, no
explanation was available for the phenomenon observed with incubation on a solid
medium.
By using this model and the model developed by Bréand et al. (1999) describing the influence of heating on regrowth lag time, it is possible to take into account the influence of the physiological state of inocula in predictive models. These models should be complemented to include the influence of other physical or chemical stress to improve the value of predictive microbiology.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Albertson, N.H., Nyström, T. and Kjelleberg, S., 1990. Macromolecular synthesis during recovery of the marine Vibrio sp. S14 from starvation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, pp. 2201–2207.
Augustin, J.-C., Rosso, L. and Carlier, V., 1999. Estimation of temperature dependent growth rate and lag time of Listeria monocytogenes by optical density measurements. J. Microbiol. Methods 38, pp. 137–146.
Augustin, J.-C., Brouillaud-Delattre, A., Rosso, L. and Carlier, V., 2000. Significance of inoculum size on the lag time of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. In press.
Baranyi, J. and Roberts, T.A., 1994. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23, pp. 277–294.
Baranyi, J. and Roberts, T.A., 1995. Mathematics of predictive food microbiology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26, pp. 199–218.
Baranyi, J., Roberts, T.A. and McClure, P., 1993. A non-autonomous differential equation to model bacterial growth. Food Microbiol. 10, pp. 43–59.
Baranyi, J., Robinson, T.P., Kaloti, A. and Mackey, B.M., 1995. Predicting growth of Brochothrix thermosphacta at changing temperature. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 27, pp. 61–75.
Bayles, D.O., Annous, B.A. and Wilkinson, B.J., 1996. Cold stress proteins induced in Listeria monocytogenes in response to temperature downshock and growth at low temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, pp. 1116–1119.
Berry, E.D. and Foegeding, P.M., 1997. Cold temperature adaptation and growth of microorganisms. J. Food Prot. 60, pp. 1583–1594.
Beumer, R.R., te Giffel, M.C., de Boer, E. and Rombouts, F.M., 1996. Growth of Listeria monocytogenes on sliced cooked meat products. Food Microbiol. 13, pp. 333–340.
Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S., 1978. Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley, New York.
Bréand, S., Fardel, G., Flandrois, J.P., Rosso, L. and Tomassone, R., 1999. A model describing the relationship between regrowth lag time and mild temperature increase for Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Micrbiol. 46, pp. 251–261.
Buchanan, R.L. and Klawitter, L.A., 1991. Effect of temperature history on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A at refrigeration temperatures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12, pp. 235–246.
Cooper, S., 1991. Bacterial Growth and Division, Academic Press, London.
Dufrenne, J., Delfgou, E., Ritmeester, W. and Notermans, S., 1997. The effect of previous growth conditions on the lag phase time of some foodborne pathogenic micro-organisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 34, pp. 89–94.
Fu, B., Taoukis, P.S. and Labuza, T.P., 1991. Predictive microbiology for monitoring spoilage of dairy products with time-temperature integrators. J. Food Sci. 56, pp. 1209–1215.
Gay, M., Cerf, O. and Davey, K.R., 1996. Significance of pre-incubation temperature and inoculum concentration on subsequent growth of Listeria monocytogenes at 14°C. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81, pp. 433–438.
George, S.M. and Lund, B.M., 1992. The effect of culture medium and aeration on growth of Listeria monocytogenes at pH 4.5. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 15, pp. 49–52.
Gounot, A.-M., 1991. Bacterial life at low temperature: physiological aspects and biotechnological implications. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71, pp. 386–397.
Hills, B.P. and Wright, K.M., 1994. A new model for bacterial growth in heterogeneous systems. J. Theor. Biol. 168, pp. 31–41.
Hills, B.P. and Mackey, B.M., 1995. Multi-compartment kinetic models for injury, resuscitation, induced lag and growth in bacterial cell populations. Food Microbiol. 12, pp. 333–346.
Hudson, J.A., 1993. Effect of pre-incubation temperature on the lag time of Aeromonas hydrophila. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 16, pp. 274–276.
Jones, P.G., VanBogelen, R.A. and Neidhardt, F.C., 1987. Induction of proteins in response to low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169, pp. 2092–2095.
Koch, A.L., 1987. The variability and individuality of the bacterium. In: Neidhardt, F.C., Ingraham, J.L., Low, K.B., Magasanik, B., Schaechter, M. and Umbarger, H.E., Editors, 1987. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp. 1606–1614.
Koch, A.L., 1995. Bacterial Growth and Form, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Kolter, R., Siegele, D.A. and Tormo, A., 1993. The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47, pp. 855–874.
Kono, T., 1968. Kinetics of microbial cell growth. Biotech. Bioeng. 10, pp. 105–131.
Labuza, T.P., Fu, B. and Taoukis, P.S., 1992. Prediction for shelf life and safety of minimally processed CAP/MAP chilled foods: a review. J. Food Prot. 55, pp. 741–750.
Lark, K.G. and Maaløe, O., 1954. The induction of cellular and nuclear division in Salmonella typhimurium by means of temperature shifts. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 15, pp. 345–355.
Li, K.-Y. and Torres, J.A., 1993. Microbial growth estimation in liquid media exposed to temperature fluctuations. J. Food Sci. 58, pp. 644–648.
Matin, A., 1992. Physiology, molecular biology and applications of the bacterial starvation response. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 73, pp. 49S–57S.
McKay, A.L., Peters, A.C. and Wimpenny, J.W.T., 1997. Determining specific growth rates in different regions of Salmonella typhimurium colonies. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 24, pp. 74–76.
Membré, J.-M., Ross, T. and McMeekin, T., 1999. Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes under combined chilling processes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 28, pp. 216–220.
Ng, H., Ingraham, J.L. and Marr, A.G., 1962. Damage and derepression in Escherichia coli resulting from growth at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 84, pp. 331–339.
Penfold, W.J., 1914. On the nature of bacterial lag. J. Hygiene 14, pp. 215–241.
Phan-Thanh, L. and Gormon, T., 1995. Analysis of heat and cold shock proteins in Listeria by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis16, pp. 444–450.
Ratkowsky, D.A., Olley, J., McMeekin, T.A. and Ball, A., 1982. Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. J. Bacteriol. 149, pp. 1–5.
Rosso, L., 1995. Modélisation et Microbiologie Prévisionnelle: Elaboration d’un nouvel outil pour l’Agro-alimentaire, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon I Ph.D. Thesis.
Rosso, L., Bajard, S., Flandrois, J.P., Lahellec, C., Fournaud, J. and Veit, P., 1996. Differential growth of Listeria monocytogenes at 4 and 8°C: consequences for the shelf life of chilled products. J. Food Prot. 59, pp. 944–949.
Siegele, D.A. and Kolter, R., 1992. Life after log. J. Bacteriol. 174, pp. 345–348.
Smith, M.G., 1987. Calculation of the expected increase of coliform organisms, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, in raw blended mutton tissue. Epidemiol. Infect. 99, pp. 323–331.
Walker, S.J., Archer, P. and Banks, J.G., 1990. Growth of Listeria monocytogenes at refrigeration temperatures. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68, pp. 157–162.
Wang, C. and Shelef, L.A., 1992. Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes and the spoilage microflora in fresh cod fish treated with lysozyme and EDTA. Food Microbiol. 9, pp. 207–213.
Wijtzes, T., van’t Riet, K., Huis in’t Veld, J.H.J. and Zwietering, M.H., 1998. A decision support system for the prediction of microbial food safety and food quality. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 42, pp. 79–90.
Zwietering, M.H., de Koos, J.T., Hasenack, B.E., de Wit, J.C. and van’t Riet, K., 1991. Modeling of bacterial growth as a function of temperature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57, pp. 1094–1101.
(order Full Text from publisher)
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||