|








| |
Scientific
Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C
| United States Patent Application |
20040126882 |
| Kind Code |
A1 |
| Ellington, Andrew D. ; et al. |
July 1, 2004 |
Regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids
Abstract
Compositions and methods are provided to make, isolate, characterize and use
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids (RCANA). The present invention
is directed to RCANA that transduce molecular recognition into catalysis. Also,
RCANAs according to the invention can be used as regulatory elements to control
the expression of one or more genes in a metabolic pathway. RCANAs can also be
used as regulated selectable markers to create a selective pressure favoring (or
disfavoring) production of a targeted bioproduct.
| Inventors: |
Ellington, Andrew D.; (Austin, TX) ;
Hesselberth, Jay; (Seattle, WA) ; Thompson, Kristin; (Arlington,
MA) ; Robertson, Michael P.; (Santa Cruz, CA) ; Sooter, Letha;
(Austin, TX) ; Davidson, Eric; (Houston, TX) ; Cox, J. Colin;
(Austin, TX) ; Riedel, Timothy; (New Braunfels, TX) ; Wilson,
Charles; (Concord, MA) ; Cload, Sharon T.; (Cambridge, MA) ;
Keefe, Anthony D.; (Cambridge, MA) |
| Correspondence Name and Address:
|
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY
AND POPEO, P.C.
ONE FINANCIAL CENTER
BOSTON
MA
02111
US
|
| Serial No.: |
254568 |
| Series Code: |
10 |
| Filed: |
September 24, 2002 |
| U.S. Current Class: |
435/455; 536/23.1 |
| U.S. Class at Publication: |
435/455; 536/023.1 |
| Intern'l Class: |
C07H 021/02; C12N 015/85 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of regulating production of a product in a cell, comprising:
inserting into a gene that produces said product or regulates the production of
said product in said cell a regulatable catalytically active nucleic acid
(RCANA), comprising a catalytic domain, which modifies a transcript to alter its
coding potential, and a regulatory domain which recognizes an effector that
alters the function of the catalytic domain; contacting said regulatory domain
with an effector thereby regulating production of said product.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the effector modulates
the activity of the catalytic domain of said RCANA.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the production of said product is fully
inhibited.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the production of said product is increased
compared to a normal control level.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the production of said product production is
partially inhibited according to the concentration of the effector.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the effector is the product.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the effector is a feedback inhibitor of said
gene.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein said product is produced in a metabolic
pathway that is being regulated.
9. The method of clain 1, wherein said effector is an intermediate in a
metabolic pathway.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein said RCANA blocks expression of said gene.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein said RCANA activates expression of said gene.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein said product is an intermediate of a
metabolic pathway.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein said biological pathway is a metabolic
pathway.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the effector is endogenous to said cell.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the effector is exogenous to said cell.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the effector is selected from the group
consisting of a protein, an enzyme, a protein pharmaceutical, a metabolite, a
drug, a dye, a vitamin, a food additive, a chemical additive, a pesticide, an
insecticide, a feed compound, and a waste product.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the drug is selected from the group
consisting of antibiotics, anticancer drugs, antifungals, cholesterol-lowering
drugs, and immunosuppressants,
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the product is selected from the group
consisting of a protein, an enzyme, a protein pharmaceutical, a metabolite, a
drug, a dye, a vitamin, a food additive, a chemical additive, a pesticide, an
insecticide, and a feed compound.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein said effector is an endproduct of a
biosynthetic process.
20. A method of regulating a biological pathway in a cell, comprising: inserting
into a first gene that produces a first product or regulates the production of
said first product in said biological pathway in a cell a first regulatable
catalytically active nucleic acid (RCANA), comprising a catalytic domain, which
catalyzes cleavage of the RCANA or excision of the RCANA from gene in which it
is inserted followed by ligation ofthc gene at 5' and 3' ends of cleavage site,
and a regulatory domain which recognizes an effector that activates a function
of the catalytic domain; inserting into a second gene that produces a second
product or regulates the production of said second product in said biological
pathway in said cell a second regulatable catalytically active nucleic acid
(RCANA), comprising a catalytic domain, which catalyzes cleavage of the RCANA or
excision of the RCANA from gene in which it is inserted followed by ligation of
the gene at 5' and 3' ends of cleavage site, and a regulatory domain which
recognizes an effector that activates a function of the catalytic domain;
contacting said first regulatory domain with a first effector thereby regulating
production of said first product, and contacting said second regulatory domain
with a second effector thereby regulating production of said second product.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the combination of said first and second
effectors control the flux of metabolites through the biological pathway.
22. The method of claim 20, wherein said biological pathway is a biosynthetic
pathway.
23. The method of claim 20, wherein said biological pathway is a metabolic
pathway.
24. The method of claim 20, wherein the biological pathway is fully inhibited.
25. The method of claim 20, wherein the biological pathway is partially
inhibited according to the concentration of said first and second effectors.
26. The method of claim 20, wherein said first product is the second effector.
27. The method of claim 20, further comprising inserting into a third gene that
produces a third product or regulates the production of said third product in
said biological pathway in said cell a third regulatable catalytically active
nucleic acid (RCANA), comprising a catalytic domain, which catalyzes cleavage of
the RCANA, or excision of the RCANA from gene in which it is inserted followed
by ligation of the gene at 5' and 3' ends of cleavage site, and a regulatory
domain which recognizes an effector that activates a function of the catalytic
domain.
28. The method of claim 20, wherein said first and second RCANAs block
expression of said first and second gene.
29. The method of claim 20, wherein said first and second RCANAs activate
expression of said first and second gene.
30. A method of screening a population of cells for a cell that produces a
bioproduct, comprising: inserting a regulatable catalytically active nucleic
acid into a reporter gene in said population of cells, such that the regulatable
catalytically active nucleic acid is regulated by said bioproduct; wherein
expression of said reporter gene indicates the production of said bioproduct a
cell.
31. The method of claim 30, further comprising isolating said cell that produces
said bioproduct.
32. The method of claim 30, wherein said reporter gene is green fluorescent
protein, thymidylate synthase, or beta lactamase.
33. A polynucleotide that is regulated by a peptide comprising: a regulatable,
catalytically active polynucleotide, wherein the peptide interacts with the
polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity
34. A nucleic acid that is regulated by an effector comprising: a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid, generated by the modification of at least one
catalytic residue.
35. A nucleic acid comprising: a gene; a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid inserted within the gene; wherein the presence of an effector
causes the nucleic acid to catalyze a reaction.
36. A nucleic acid segment comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid, selected from a pool of nucleic acids in which at least one of the
catalytic residues has been randomized.
37. A regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid segment comprising: an
effector domain; and a nucleic, acid catalyst domain in which one or more
critical catalytic residues of the nucleic acid catalyst have been randomized;
wherein the kinetic parameters of the catalytic domain are regulated by an
effector that interacts with the effector domain.
38. A method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of-randomizing at least one nucleotide in the catalytic
domain of a catalytically active nucleic acid to create a nucleic acid pool;
removing from the nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain; adding an effector molecule to the
nucleic acids; and isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain.
39. A method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid
having a catalytic and an effector domain, comprising the steps of-randomiziig
at least one nucleotide in the catalytic domain of the nucleic acid to create a
nucleic acid pool; removing from the nucleic acid pool those randomized nucleic
acids that interact with the catalytic target of the catalytic domain; adding an
effector to the nucleic acids; and isolating the nucleic acids that interact
with the catalytic target of the catalytic domain.
40. A method of detection of a target using a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid comprising the steps of: contacting the a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid with the target; and measuring the effect of
the interaction between the a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid and
the target.
41. A method of modifying a target using a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid comprising the steps of-providing a regulatable, catalytically
active nucleic acid capable of target specific modification; and modifying the
target under conditions that cause a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acid-specific activity.
42. A method of selecting a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of-contacting a pool of nucleic acids, the nucleic acids
having a catalytic and an effector domain, wherein at least one nucleotide in
the catalytic domain of the nucleic acids has been randomized; removing from the
nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of
the catalytic domain; adding an effector to the remaining nucleic acids; and
isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain; introducing the nucleic acids into a host cell; and measuring
the catalytic activity of the nucleic acid upon exposure of the host cell to the
effector.
43. A method of detecting a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acid; creating a construct in which the nucleic acid is in position to regulate
the expression of a reporter gene; introducing the construct into a host cell;
and measuring the catalytic activity of the nucleic acid upon exposure of the
host cell to an effector.
44. A method of modulating expression of a nucleic acid, the method comprising
providing a polynucleotide that is regulated by a peptide, the polynucleotide
comprising a regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide, wherein the
peptide interacts with the polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity; and
contacting the polynucleotide with the peptide, thereby modulating expression of
a nucleic acid.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein the polynucleotide is provided in a cell.
46. The method of claim 44, wherein the cell is provided in vitro.
47. The method of claim 44, wherein the cell is provided in vivo.
48. The method of claim 44, wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell.
49. The method of claim 44, wherein the cell is a eukaryotic cell.
50. A method of modulating expression of a nucleic acid, the method comprising
the steps of-providing a nucleic acid that is regulated by an effector, the
nucleic, acid comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
wherein the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid molecule includes at
least one modified catalytic residue; and contacting the nucleic acid with the
effector, thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/324,715, filed
Sep. 24, 2001; and is a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/661,658, filed
Sep. 14, 2000, which claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/212,097, filed Jun.
15, 2000; and is a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/666,870, filed Sep.
20, 2000, which claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/212,097, filed Jun. 15,
2000; and is a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/883,119, filed Jun. 14,
2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/212,097, filed Jun. 15, 2000,
each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to the field of catalytic nucleic
acids and in particular to regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids that
modulate their kinetic parameters in response to the presence of an effector.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Dyes, vitamins, food/chemical additives, enzymes, protein
pharmaceuticals, pesticides, insecticides, and feed compounds for industrial
chemical processes are but a few categories of compounds (bioproducts) derived
from biological hosts. Many compounds in use or under development as
therapeutics are synthesized entirely or partially in biological hosts, e.g.,
drugs such as antibiotics, anticancer drugs, antiftingals, cholesterol-lowering
drugs, and immunosuppressants. In addition, a range of waste products (e.g.,
heavy metals) are actively accumulated within biological hosts in some
bioremediation applications. Biological hosts used to synthesize/accumulate
bioproducts include bacteria, eukaryotic microorganisms (e.g., Saccharomyces
cerevisiae), plants, animal cells (e.g., transformed insect cells growing in
culture), and animals.
[0004] The production of bioproducts can be high because many are generated at
relatively low levels in host expression systems. To optimize expression of
desired compounds that are synthesized or accumulated in biological host
cells/organisms, careful control over the biosynthetic process is often
required. Expression levels of a natural product can vary between related
strains of a biological host.
[0005] Ribozymes are oligonucleotides of RNA that can act like enzymes and are
sometimes called RNA enzymes. Generally, they have the ability to behave like an
endoribonuclease, catalyzing the cleavage of RNA molecules. The location of the
cleavage site is highly sequence specific, approaching the sequence specificity
of DNA restriction endonuclcases. By varying conditions, ribozymes can also act
as polymerases or dephosphoryl ases.
[0006] Ribozymes were first described in connection with Tetrahymena
thermophilia. The Tetrahymena rRNA was shown to contain an intervening sequence
(IVS) capable of excising itself out of a large ribosomal RNA precursor. The IVS
is a catalytic RNA molecule that mediates self-splicing out of a precursor,
whereupon it converts itself into a circular form. The Tetrahymena IVS is more
commonly known now as the Group I Intron. A subclass of ribozymes are the
catalytically active, regulatable nucleic acids (RCANAs). The catalytic activity
of the RCANAs can be regulated by an effector. Effector-sensitive RCANAs have
been described, wherein the activity of the RCANA is regulated by a
ligand-binding moiety. Upon binding the ligand, the RCANA activity on a target
RNA is changed. Such RCANAs have only been described for small molecule ligands
such as organic or inorganic molecules. Effector-sensitive RCANAs can also be
controlled by proteins, peptides, or other macro-molecules.
[0007] The invention makes it possible to rapidly optimize the production of
useful bioproducts by identifying optimal conditions for production, by
engineering the metabolic pathways of host cells/organisms used in
biosynthesis/bioremediation, and by identifying genetic variants with improved
biosynthetic/bioremediative properties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present invention includes RCANAs wherein the catalytic activity of
the RCANA is regulated by an effector. The RCANA of the present invention are,
therefore, regulatable in that their activity is under the control of a second
portion of the RCANA. Just as allosteric protein enzymes undergo a change in
their kinetic parameters or of their enzymatic activity in response to
interactions with an effector, the catalytic abilities of the RCANA may
similarly be modulated by the effector(s). Thus, the present invention is
directed to RCANA that transduce molecular recognition into catalysis. Also,
RCANAs according to the invention can be used as regulatory elements to control
the expression of one or more genes in a metabolic pathway. RCANAs can also be
used as regulated selectable markers to create a selective pressure favoring (or
disfavoring) production of a targeted bioproduct.
[0009] As will become apparent below, RCANA are more robust than allosteric
protein enzymes in several ways: (1) they can be selected in vitro, which
facilitates the engineering of particular constructs; (2) the levels of
catalytic modulation are much greater for RCANA than for protein enzymes; and
(3) since RCANA are nucleic acids, they can potentially interact with the
genetic machinery in ways that protein molecules may not.
[0010] It should be noted that the methods described herein may include any type
of nucleic acid. For example, these methods are not limited to RNA-based RCANA,
but also encompass DNA RCANA and RNA or DNA RCANA. Furthermore, the methods can
be applied to any catalytic activity the ribozymes are capable of carrying out.
For example, the methods are not limited to ligases or splicing reactions, but
could also encompass other ribozyme classes. The methods are also not limited to
protein or peptide ligands, but also include-other molecular species, such as
ions, small molecules, organic molecules, metabolites, sugars and carbohydrates,
lipids and nucleic acids. The methods may also be extended to effectors that are
not molecules, such as heat or light or electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, the
methods are not limited to ligand-induced conformational. changes, but could
also take into account chimeric catalysts in which residues essential for
chemical reactivity were provided by both the nucleic acid and the ligand, in
concert.
[0011] The effector may be a peptide, a polypeptide, a polypeptide complex, or a
modified polypeptide or peptide. The effector may even be, e.g., an enzyme or
even light (such as visible light) or even a magnet. The effector may be
activated by a second effector that acts on the first effector (also referred to
herein as an effector-effector), which may be an inorganic or an organic
molecule. The polypeptide, peptide or polypeptide complex can be either
endogenous, i.e., derived from the same cell type as the polynucleotide, or
exogenous, i.e., derived from a cell type different than the cell from which the
polynucleotide is derived.
[0012] The polypeptide or peptide may be phosphorylated or dephosphorylated.
Alternatively, the effector may include a pharmaceutical agent. In some
embodiments, the nucleic acid catalyzes a reaction that causes the expression of
a target gene to be upregulated. In other embodiments, the nucleic acid
catalyzes a reaction that causes the expression of a target gene to be
down-regulated. If desired, the nucleic acid may be used to detect at least one
exogenous effector from a library of candidate exogenous effector molecules. In
some embodiments, the nucleic acid and the effector form a nucleic acid-effector
complex.
[0013] In some embodiments, the kinetic parameters of nucleic acid catalysis are
altered in the presence of a supermolecular structure, e.g., a viral particle or
a cell wall. The nucleic acid may further include a regulatory element that can
recognize a target molecule of interest. The nucleic acid may in addition
include a transducer element that transmits information from the regulatory
element to the catalytically active region of the nucleic acid.
[0014] Modification of Catalytic Residiues of RCANA. In one embodiment of this
invention, the RCANA is generated by the modification of at least one catalytic
residue. One of the unique features of the present selection protocol relative
to others that have previously been published is that the present invention
randomizes not only a domain that is pendant on the catalytic core, but a
portion of the catalytic core itself. Thus, the selection for ligand-dependence
not only yields species that bind to ancillary regions of the RCANA, but that
may help stabilize the catalytic core of the RCANA.
[0015] Also provided by the invention is a method of isolating a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic, acid created by randomizing at least one
nucleotide in the catalytic domain of a catalytically active nucleic acid to
create a nucleic acid pool. The nucleic acid pool whose nucleic, acids interact
with the catalytic target of the catalytic domain are removed. The method
further may also include the step of adding an effector to the remaining pool of
nucleic acids. In some embodiments, the method may also include the step of
adding 4 an effector to the remaining nucleic acids, wherein the effector acts
on the nucleic acids to alter the catalytic activities of the nucleic acids. The
method may include optionally the step of purifying the isolated nucleic acid,
and, if desired the step of sequencing the isolated nucleic acid. In various
embodiments, the step of removing the nucleic acids is under high stringency
conditions, moderate stringency conditions, or low stringency conditions.
[0016] In vitro sensing (or detection) applications. The current invention also
provides for the use of RCANA for detection of a wide variety molecular species
in vitro. For example, RCANA may be anchored to a chip, such as wells in a
multi-well plate. Mixtures of analytes and fluorescently tagged substrates are
added to each well. Where cognate effectors are present, the RCANA will
covalently attach the fluorescent tags to themselves. Where RCANA have not been
activated by effectors, the tagged substrates are washed out of the well. After
reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of co-immobilized fluorescent
tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were present during the reaction.
The reporter may be a fluorescent tag, but it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic
particle, or any number of detectible particles. Additionally, the RCANA may be
immobilized on beads, but they could also be directly attached to a solid
support via covalent bonds.
[0017] One advantage of this embodiment is that covalent immobilization of
reporters (as opposed to non covalent immobilization, as in EL1SA assays) allows
stringent wash steps to be employed. Additionally, ribozyme ligases have the
unique property of being able to transduce effectors into templates that may be
amplified, affording an additional boost in signal prior to detection.
[0018] Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the RCANA that substantially
stabilize them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The
analytical methods of the present invention do not rely on binding per se, but
only on transient interactions. The present invention requires mere recognition
rather that actual binding, providing a potential advantage of RCANA over
antibodies. That is, even low affinities are sufficient for activation and
subsequent detection, especially if individual immobilized RCANA are examined
(i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
[0019] Expression of RCANA in cells. The RCANAs of the present invention may
also be expressed inside cells. The RCANAs of the present invention that are
expressed inside a cell are not only responsive to a given effector, but are
also able to participate in genetic regulation or responsiveness. In particular,
self-splicing introns can splice themselves out of genes in response to
exogenous or endogenous effector molecules.
[0020] The present invention includes RCANA constructs that may be inserted into
a gene of interest, e.g, a gene targeting expression vector. The RCANA sequence
provides gene specific recognition as well as modulation of the RCANA's kinetic
parameters. The kinetic parameters of the RCANA vary in response to an effector.
Specifically, in the case of RCANA that performs self splicing in the presence
of the effector, the RCANA may splices itself out of the gene in response to the
effector to regulate expression of the gene. RCANAs according to the invention
can be used as regulatory elements to control the expression of one or more
genes in a metabolic pathway. RCANAs can also be used as regulated selectable
markers to create a selective pressure favoring (or disfavoring) production of a
targeted bioproduct.
[0021] In another aspect, the invention includes a method of modulating
expression of a nucleic acid by providing a polynucleotide that is regulated by
a peptide. The polynucleotide may be a regulatable, catalytically active
polynucleotide, in which the peptide interacts with the polynucleotide to affect
its catalytic activity. The polynucleotide is contacted with the peptide,
thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid. The polynucleotide may be
provided in a cell, and the cell may be, e.g, provided in vitro or in vivo and
may be a prokaryotic cell or a even a eukaryotic cell.
[0022] The present invention also includes an RCANA construct with a regulatable
oligonucleotide sequence having a regulatory domain, such that the kinetic
parameters of the RCANA on a target gene vary in response to the interaction of
an effector with the regulatory domain.
[0023] In vivo sensing (or detection) applications. It is possible to activate
or repress a reporter gene (e.g., luciferase) containing an engineered intron in
response to an endogenous activator. In this way, luciferase-engineered intron
constructs may be used to monitor intracellular levels of proteins or small
molecules such as cyclic AMP. This method may be used for in vivo measurements
in both cellular systems, such as cell culture, and in whole organisms, such as
animal models. Such applications may be used for high-throughput screening. If a
particular intracellular signal (e.g, the production of a tumor repressor) was
desired, compound libraries for pharmacophores that induce the signal (the tumor
repressor) are screened for activation of the reporter gene. Thus, the
information desired is changed or morphed into the detection of glowing cells.
[0024] Gene therapy applications. Similarly, a gene can be activated or
repressed in response to an exogenously introduced effector (drug) for gene
therapy. The RCANA may be used for gene expression up regulation (increasing
production of the gene product) or down regulation (decreasing the production of
the gene product). The construct of one embodiment of the present invention
provides a DNA oligonucleotide coding for a catalytic domain and effector
binding domain. The advantages of the nucleic acid-based technology of the
present invention include, e.g., the ability to continually modulate gene
expression with a high degree of sensitivity without additional gene therapy
interventions.
[0025] In another aspect, the invention includes a method of modulating
expression of a nucleic acid in a cell by providing a polynucleotide that is
regulated by an effector, e.g., a peptide. The polynucleotide may be a
regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide, in which the peptide interacts
with the polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity. The polynucleotide is
contacted with the peptide, thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid. The
polynucleotide may be provided in a cell, and the cell may be, e.g., provided in
vitro or in vivo and may be a prokaryotic cell or a even a eukaryotic cell.
[0026] Biosynthelic application of RCANAs. This invention describes methods by
which effector-sensitive RCANAs can be used to facilitate industrial
biosynthesis and bioremediation. For example, provided are methods in which
effector-dependent ribozymes can be used to (1) control production of a natural
product in a biological host, (2) to identify environmental conditions which
increase biosynthetic yields, and (3) to isolate strains of a biological host
with improved product yields and/or properties.
[0027] As sensors, effector-sensitive RCANAs can be used to accurately monitor
the concentration of a natural product as it is produced, either directly in
vivo or ex vivo (e.g. following lysis). A wide range of environmental conditions
and variant strains can be tested for synthesis of a natural product and the
riboreporter used to define the best conditions/variants to use for production.
Sensor applications include both in vivo and in vitro applications.
[0028] As regulatory elements, effector-sensitive RCANAs can be used to control
the expression of one or more genes involved in a metabolic pathway. By
coordinating gene expression, it is possible to optimize production of a
targeted metabolite, staging production of the intermediates required to
generate it or timing induction of bioproduct synthesis with respect to host
growth.
[0029] As regulated selectable markers, effector-sensitive RCANAs can be used to
create a selective pressure favoring (or disfavoring) production of targeted
bioproduct. Host strains carrying the RCANA-selectable marker construct can be
subjected to mutagenesis or transformed with a vector library in ways that
change the concentration of bioproduct generated by the host. When subjected to
appropriate selection conditions, variants with the highest (or lowest) internal
concentrations of the targeted bioproduct are favored for survival.
[0030] The present invention includes, methods of regulating (e.g., increase or
decrease) production of a product in a cell. Production is regulated by
inserting into a gene that produces the product or alternatively regulates the
production of the product a RCANA. An RCANA includes a catalytic domain and a
regulatory (or effector) domain. The regulatory domain is contacted with an
effector such as to alter (i.e., activate) a function of the catalytic domain.
[0031] Also provided by the invention are methods of regulating a biological
pathway in a cell, by inserting into two or more genes that produce a product or
regulates the production of the product in the biological pathway in a cell a
RCANA. The regulatory domain of the RCANA is contacted with an effector such as
to alter (i.e., activate) a function of the catalytic domain. For example, a
biological pathway is regulated in a cell, by inserting into a first gene that
produces a first product or regulates the production of the first product in the
biological pathway in a cell a first RCANA. Following insertion of the first
RCANA, an RCANA is inserted into a second gene that produces a second product or
regulates the production of the second product in the biological pathway in the
cell. The first effector activating the first RCANA is then contacted with the
first regulatory domain thereby regulating production of the first product and
the second regulatory domain is contacted with the second effector thereby
regulating production of the second product. The first product can be the second
effector.
[0032] The first and second RCANAs can block expression of the first and second
gene. Alternatively, the first and second RCANAs can activate expression of the
first and second gene. Accordingly, the combination of the first and second
effectors can control the flux of metabolites through a biological pathway.
[0033] In various embodiments, the above method can be further elaborated by
inserting an RCANA into a third gene that produces a third product or regulates
the production of a third product. RCANAs can be inserted into additional genes
(e.g., four, five six or more genes) to further regulate the biological pathway.
[0034] The biological pathway can be for example a biosynthetic pathway. The
biological pathway can a metabolic pathway. The biological pathway can be either
fully inhibited or partially inhibited according to the concentration of the
first and second effectors.
[0035] By catalytic domain is meant that the domain modifies a transcript to
alter its coding potential, i.e., the ability to be transcribed or translated to
yield the encoded polypeptide. Modification includes splicing, e.g., self
splicing and rescission and ligation, and endonucleoltyic cleavage. Modification
can be non-covalent, e.g., structural or conformational alteration or a covalent
modification.
[0036] By regulatory domain is meant the region of effector binding on an RCANA.
[0037] Function of the catalytic domain include, endonucleolytic and ligase
activity. For example the catalytic domain catalyzes cleavage of the RCANA.
Alternatively the catalytic domain catalyzes the excision of the RCANA from the
gene in which it is inserted followed by ligation of the gene at the 5' and 3'
ends of the cleavage site.
[0038] The product is the endproduct of a biosynthetic/metabolic process. For
example, the product is a protein, an enzyme, a protein pharmaceutical, a
metabolite, a drug, a dye, a vitamin, a food additive, a chemical additive, a
pesticide, an insecticide, or a feed compound.
[0039] The effector is a substance other than the target product or it can be
the target product. The effector is a protein, an enzyme, a protein
pharmaceutical, a metabolite, a drug, a dye, a vitamin, a food additive, a
chemical additive, a pesticide, an insecticide, a feed compound, or a waste
product. Where the effector is a drug, the effector can be an antibiotic,
anticancer drug, antifungal, cholesterol-lowering drug, or immunosuppressant.
[0040] For example, where the effector is the product, it can also act as a
feedback inhibitor of the gene in which the RCANA is inserted or be an
intermediate in a biosynthetic/metabolic pathway. The effector is either
exogenous or endogenous to the cell. Contacting the regulatory domain with the
effector(s) may either increase or decrease production of the targeted product
compared to the level of target product observed in the absence of effector(s)
(i.e., normal control level). The effector(s) may mediate RCANA activity in a
concentration-dependent manner.
[0041] The RCANA blocks or activates the expression of the gene. By blocks
expression is meant that the RCANA interrupts the transcription of the gene or
the translation of the protein. By activates expression is meant that the
effector binding of the RCANA leads to enhanced transcription of the gene or the
translation of the protein.
[0042] The effector may act via a feedback mechanism to regulate the activity of
the target gene. That is, an effector-activated RCANA can act in a negative
feedback loop to inhibit the target gene. Alternatively, an effector-activated
RCANA can act in a positive feeback loop to increase expression of the target
gene.
[0043] The cell is for example a prokaryotic eukaryotic, bacterial, or insect
cell. In yet another aspect, the present invention includes, methods of
screening a population of cells for a cell that produces a bioproduct. This
screening method includes inserting an RCANA into a reporter gene, e.g., green
fluorescent protein, thymidylate synthase, or beta lactamase in a population of
cells, such that the RCANA is regulated by the bioproduct. The product of the
reporter gene provides a growth advantage to host cells expressing the
bioproduct. Cells producing the bioproduct can be isolated by measuring the
expression of the reporter gene which indicates the production of the bioproduct
in the cell. Cell are isolated by methods know in the art such a fluorescent
activated cell sorting.
[0044] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein
have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art
to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or
equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of
the invention, suitable methods and materials are described below. All
publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned
herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In the case of conflict,
the present Specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the
materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be
limiting.
[0045] Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the
following detailed description and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046] For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the
present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the
invention along with the accompanying figures in which corresponding numerals in
different figures refer to corresponding parts and in which:
[0047] FIG. 1 is a depiction of the secondary structure of the Group I
theophylline-dependent (td) intron of bacteriophage T4 (wild type).
[0048] FIG. 2a is a photograph of a gel showing activation of the GpITh1P6.131
aptamer construct, together with a graphical representation of the gel, of one
embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 2b is a photograph of a gel showing
activation of GpITh2P6.133 aptamer construct, together with a graphical
representation of the gel of one embodiment of the present invention.
[0049] FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of an in vivo assay system for group I
introns of one embodiment of the present invention.
[0050] FIG. 4a is a depiction of a portion of the P6 region of the Group I
ribozyme joined to the anti-theophylline aptamer by a short randomized region to
generate a pool of aptazymes of the present invention.
[0051] FIG. 4b is a schematic depiction of a selection protocol for the Group I
P6 Aptazyme Pool of FIG. 4a.
[0052] FIG. 5 is a diagram of one embodiment of the present invention depicting
exogenous or endogenous activation of Group I intron splicing;
[0053] FIG. 6 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention
depicting a strategy for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0054] FIG. 7 is a diagram of an alternative embodiment of the present invention
for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0055] FIG. 8 is a diagram of yet another alternative embodiment of the present
invention for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0056] FIG. 9 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention for
screening for endogenous activators;
[0057] FIG. 10 is a diagram of an alternative to the embodiment of FIG. 9 of the
present invention to screen for endogenous activators;
[0058] FIG. 11 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention to
screen for compounds that perturb cellular metabolism;
[0059] FIG. 12 is a diagram of a further embodiment of the present invention
that provides a non-invasive readout of metabolic states;
[0060] FIG. 13 is a diagram of yet a further embodiment of the present invention
wherein endogenous suppressors provide a non-invasive readout of multiple
metabolic states;
[0061] FIG. 14 is a schematic depiction of an example of a work surface for
automatic selection procedures of one embodiment of the invention;
[0062] FIG. 15a is an illustration of the L1 ligase aptazyme construct of one
embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 15b is an illustration of a modified
L1 ligase aptazyme construct of FIG. 15a of the present invention;
[0063] FIG. 15c is a schematic diagram of a selection protocol of one embodiment
of the present invention;
[0064] FIG. 16(a-c) is a schematic diagram of a method to anchor an aptazyme
construct of the present invention to a solid support in one embodiment of the
present invention;
[0065] FIGS. 17(a-c) is a schematic showing the L1 ligase was the starting point
for pool design;
[0066] FIG. 18(a-d) are charts and graphs showing the progression of the L1-N50
selections;
[0067] FIG. 19(a & b) is a schematic showing protein-dependent regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid sequences and structures;
[0068] FIG. 20 is a graph demonstrating the ribozyme activity with inactivated
protein samples;
[0069] FIG. 21 is a graph demonstrating an aptamer competition assays;
[0070] FIG. 22 is a flow chart of a method for negative and positive selection
of RCANA;
[0071] FIG. 23 is a flow chart of a method for negative and positive selection
of RCANA;
[0072] FIG. 24 is a graph showing the progress of the L1-N50 Rev selection;
[0073] FIG. 25(a,b,c) schematic showing the theophylline-dependent td group I
intron constructs of the present invention;
[0074] FIG. 26 is a schematic showing the design of an FMN-dependent td nucleic
acid intron splicing construct;
[0075] FIGS. 27(a-c) is a graph showing the relative growth curves of
theophylline-dependent in vivo growth;
[0076] FIG. 28 is a graph showing 3-Methylxanthine dependent in vivo growth;
[0077] FIG. 29(a & b) is a schematic of a ribozyme ligase array;
[0078] FIG. 30 is an image showing the results of a rcgulatable, catalytically
active ligase array;
[0079] FIG. 31 is a graph showing the titrations of individual allosteric
ribozyme ligases;
[0080] FIG. 32 is a schematic showing RCANA-mediated control of gene expression
in a biochemical metabolic pathway using a single exogenous effector;
[0081] FIG. 33 is a schematic showing RCANA-mediated control of gene expression
in a biochemical metabolic pathway using multiple exogenous effectors;
[0082] FIG. 34 schematic showing shows the usc of metabolite-sensitive RCANAs to
maintain constant levels of end-product in a biochemical metabolic pathway;
[0083] FIG. 35 is a schematic showing the use of RCANA-mediated control of gene
expression;
[0084] FIG. 36 is a schematic showing RCANA-based cell selection;
[0085] FIG. 37 is a schematic showing RCANA-based cell selection;
[0086] FIG. 38 is a schematic showing RCANA- based in vivo sensors;
[0087] FIG. 39 is a schematic showing synthesis of an RCANA-based in vivo
sensor.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0088] While the making and using of various embodiments of the present
invention are discussed in detail below, the present invention provides many
applicable inventive concepts that may be embodied in a wide variety of specific
contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of
specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the
invention.
[0089] The present invention includes compositions or matter, methods and
automation that permit the creation, isolation, identification, characterization
and optimization of regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids. Furthermore,
it includes methods to use RCANA for in vitro sensing (or detection), in vivo
sensing (or detection), and gene therapy. Regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic, acids selected by the method of the present invention also have
advantages over other biopolymers that might be used for sensing or gene
regulation. Regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids are more robust than
allosteric protein enzymes in several ways: (1) they can be selected in vitro
(facilitating the engineering of particular constructs); (2) the levels of
catalytic modulation arc much greater than those typically observed with protein
enzymes; and (3) since regulatable, catalytically active micleic acids are
nucleic acids, they can potentially interact with the genetic machinery in ways
that protein molecules may not.
[0090] The method is not limited to RNA pools, but may also encompass DNA pools
or modified RNA pools. Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids that substantially stabilize
them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The method is not
limited to ligascs, but could also encompass other ribozyme classes. The method
is not limited to protein-induced conformational changes, but could also take
into account chimeric catalysts in which residues essential for chemical
reactivity were provided by both the nucleic acid and the protein in concert.
Initially, many protein targets may prove refractive to selection. Many
derivatives of the base method can be developed, however, to deal with novel
targets or target classes.
[0091] A. Protein Dependent RCANA
[0092] Effector-dependent ribozymes have been shown to be responsive to small
organic compounds, such as ATP and theophylline. The present inventors
recognized the need for effector-dependent ribozymes, or as used herein,
"regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids" that are responsive to larger
molecules, such as, e.g., peptides or proteins. The peptides, proteins or other
large molecules may be provided from endogenous sources (e.g., expressed within
a cell or cell extract), or exogenous sources (added or expressed in a cell or
cell extract).
[0093] In order to understand the present invention, it is important to
understand that previous attempts to make catalytically active nucleic acids
that interact and respond to a large effector, by the inventors and others, have
failed. Initially, attempts were made to generate protein-dependent ribozymes by
the addition of aptamers (known binding sequences) to ribozymes (catalytically
active domains). This design and method was unsuccessful in providing
regulatable nucleic acids. Next, attempts were made to generate
protein-dependent ribozymes by adding random sequence regions between an aptamer
(binding) and a ribozyme (catalytic) and selecting for effector-dependence.
These attempts were also unsuccessful. Next, the inventors attempted to generate
protein-dependent ribozymes by adding a large random sequence region to the
catalytic cores of ribozymes and selecting for effector-dependence. These
attempts were also unsuccessful. In other words, all previously detailed methods
for the generation of ribozymes that were dependent on small organic compounds
were unsuccessful for generating ribozymes that were dependent on proteins.
[0094] To date, the present inventors have selected a number of protein-and
peptide dependent ribozyme ligases. One example is the isolation of a
protein-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid with an
activity that was increased in a standard assay by 75,000-fold in the presence
of its cognate protein effector, tyrosyl tRNA synthetase from Neurospora
mitochondria (Cyt18). The Cyt18-dependent ribozyme was not activated by
non-cognate proteins, including other tRNA synthetases.
[0095] A protein-dependent regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid was
also created and selected with an activity that was increased by 3,500-fold in
the presence of its cognate protein effector, hen egg white lysozyme. The
lysozyme-dependent ribozyme was not activated by most non-cognate proteins,
including T4 lysozyme, but was activated by a very closely related protein,
turkey egg white lysozyme. Moreover, the protein-dependent ribozyme was
inhibited by a RNA binding species that specifically bound to lysozyme. In other
words, the activation of these protein-dependent ribozymes was highly specific.
[0096] A peptide-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids was
also created and isolated with activity was increased by 18,000-fold in the
presence of its cognate peptide effector, the arginine-rich motif (ARM) from the
HIV-I Rev protein. The Rev-dependent nucleic acid was not activated by other
ARMs from other viral proteins, such as UTLV-I Rex. Using the present invention,
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids may be developed that are
regulated by any of a vast number of effectors.
[0097] As will be clear from the continued description, protein dependent RCANAs
are useful in a variety of applications. For example, protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids can be used (1) for the acquisition of data
about whole proteomes, (2) as in vitro diagnostic reagents to detect proteins
specific to disease states, such as prostate specific antigen or viral proteins,
(3) as sentinels for the detection of biological warfare agents, or (4) as
regulatory elements in gene therapies.
B. Modification of Residues in Catalytic Domain
[0098] In one embodiment, the present invention randomizes a portion of the
catalytic core itself, not necessarily a domain that is pendant on the catalytic
core. One example for selection using the present invention was using the L1
ligase. The catalytic core of the L1 ligase has been mapped by deletion analysis
and by partial randomization and re-selection. FIG. 15a depicts the L1 ligase
that was the starting point for pool design. Stems A, B, and C are indicated.
The shaded region contains the catalytic core and ligation junction. Primer
binding sites are shown in lower case, an oligonucleotide effector required for
activity is shown in italics, and the ligation substrate is bolded. The `tag` on
the ligation substrate can be varied, but was biotin in the exemplary selection
described herein. The L1 pool contains random sequence positions and overlaps
with a portion of the ribozyme core. In FIG. 15b, Stem B was reduced in size and
terminated with a stable GNRA tetraloop, but stem A was unchanged.
[0099] A pool was synthesized in which the random sequence region spanned the
catalytic core. Protein-dependent ribozymes were selected from this random
sequence pool by selecting for the ability to ligate an oligonucleotide tag in
the presence of a protein effector followed by capturing the oligonucleotide tag
on an affinity matrix, followed by amplification in vitro or in vivo. Because
the catalytic core has been randomized, the selection for protein-dependence not
only yields species that may bind to ancillary regions of the ribozyme, but
species in which the protein effector actually helps to organize the catalytic
core of the ribozyme.
[0100] Selection for protein-dependence from a pool in which at least a portion
of the catalytic core of the ribozyme is randomized differs from selection for
protein dependence from a pool in which the catalytic core is not randomized.
For example, the catalytic core of the protein-dependent ribozymes that was
selected differed substantially from the catalytic core of the original ribozyme
and the catalytic core of other, nonprotein-dependent ribozymes selected based
on the original ribozyme.
[0101] FIG. 15a depicts the L1 ligase that was the starting point for pool
design in the Cyt18 RCANA selection, as an example of a protein-activated
regulated, catalytically active nucleic acid. Stems A, B, and C are indicated.
The shaded region contains the catalytic core and ligation junction. Primer
binding sites are shown in lower case, an oligonucleotide effector required for
activity is shown in italics, and the ligation substrate 14 is bold font. The
`tag` on the ligation substrate can be varied, but was biotin in the exemplary
selection described herein. The LI pool contains 50 random sequence positions
and overlaps with a portion of the ribozyme core. In FIG. 15b, Stem B was
reduced in size and terminated with a stable GNRA tetraloop, but stem A was
unchanged.
[0102] Because one or more residues in the catalytic core have been randomized,
the effectors may add essential catalytic residues for a given reaction. That
is, both the effector molecule and the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acids contribute a portion of the active site of the ribozyme. For example,
using the method of the present invention a ribozyme and an effector molecule
that would only carry-out poorly an enzymatic function independently may perform
that enzymatic function upon interaction with one another. As such, a
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid that contributes a guanosine and
an adenosine and a protein effector that contributes a histidine together form a
complex that has greater activity than either of the individual compounds. Using
the methods disclosed herein it is possible to identify a chimeric
effector:ribozyme (e.g., a protein:RNA complex) active site that would lead to
catalysis. The invention describes ribozymes that have a detectable, basal
chemical reactivity, and that the presence of the effector modulates this basal
chemical reactivity. It is for this reason that the present invention differs
significantly from other inventions which have claimed protein:RNA complexes in
which no basal catalytic activity exists in the ribozyme or protein alone.
C. Selection of RCANA
[0103] FIG. 15c schematically shows the following selection scheme: the RNA pool
was incubated with a biotinylated tag and reactive variants were removed from
the population. The remaining species were again incubated with a biotinylated
tag in the presence of the target (for example the protein Cyt18). Reactive
variants were removed from the population and preferentially amplified by
reverse transcription, PCR, and in vitro transcription.
[0104] Ligand-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids
selected by this method differ from functional nucleic acids selected from
random sequence pools. Selection for ligand-dependence requires a selection for
catalytic activity as opposed to a selection for binding. Therefore,
protein-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids are not
aptamers. The composition of matter of a selected protein dependent ribozyme
will be different than the composition of matter of a selected aptamer. For
example, the sequence of the lysozyme-dependent ribozyme is different from the
sequence of anti-lysozyme aptamers. An important feature of the present
invention is that the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids disclosed
herein only required recognition rather than selected or enhanced binding
ability. For example, the affinity of lysozyme for the naive, unselected RNA
pool is identical to the affinity of lysozyme for the selected, regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid. The only difference is that the way in which
lysozyme is recognized by the regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids
leads to activation, while for the pool as a whole non-specific binding does not
lead to activation. In other words, binding is a concomitant but secondary
function of selection for regulatability; that is, the regulatable ribozymes
disclosed herein may bind the effector or target very poorly, but upon
interaction the activity of the ribozyme may nonetheless be modulated.
D. Automated Selection of RCANA
[0105] Robotic workstations have become essential to high-throughput
manipulations of biomolecules, such as in high-throughput screening for drugs
with a particular mechanism of action. The invention also includes the
automation of in vitro selection procedures, and a mechanized system that
executes both common and modified in vitro selection procedures. Automation
facilitates the execution of this procedure, accomplishing in h to days what
once necessitated weeks to month. In particular, the present inventors have
adapted a robotic workstation to the selection of aptamers and ribozymes.
However, the automation methods are generalizable to a number of different types
of selections, including selections with DNA or modified RNA, selections for
ribozymes, and selections for phage-displayed or cell-surface proteins.
[0106] In short, in vitfro selection involves several components: generation of
a random sequence pool, sieving the random sequence pool for nucleic acid
species that bind a given target or catalyze a given reaction, amplification of
the sieved species by a combination of reverse transcription, the polymerase
chain reaction, and in vitro transcription. Beyond the generation of the random
sequence pool, each of these steps can potentially be carried out by a robotic
workstation. The pool can be pipetted together 16 with a target molecule. If the
target is immobilized on a magnetic bead, then the nucleic acid:target complex
can be sieved from solution using an integrated magnetic bead collector.
Finally, selected nucleic acid species can be eluted from the complex and
amplified via a series of enzymatic steps that include the polymerase chain
reaction carried out via an integrated thermal cycler.
[0107] There are many potential ways in which binding species can be sieved fiom
a random sequence population. However, not all of these methods are amenable to
automated selection. For example, to select aptamers, others have suggested that
targets can be immobilized onto microtitre plates and binding species can be
sieved by panning. The present inventors have had little success with this
method, likely because panning is a relatively inefficient, low stringency
method for sieving. Instead, the present inventors have discovered that when
targets are immobilized on beads and mixed with a random sequence pool, binding
species can be efficiently sieved from non-binding species by filtration of the
beads. Beads can be readily manipulated by pipetting, allowing for the facile
recovery and elution of the binding species, which are then amplified and
carried into subsequent rounds of selection. This method differs from the
magnetic bead capture method, and can be carried out with much higher
stringency. This method is novel, and has not previously been used for in vitro
selection experiments.
[0108] FIG. 14 depicts schematically an exemplary work surface for yet another
embodiment of the present invention: automated selection. See, J. C. Cox, et
al., Automated RNA Selection Biotechnol Prog., 14, 845 850, 1998.
[0109] Base protocol. Automated selection involves several, sequential automated
steps.
[0110] Several modules are placed on the robotic work surface, including a
magnetic bead separator, and enzyme cooler, and a thermal cycler. After manually
preparing reagents and preloading those reagents (including random pool RNA,
buffers, enzymes, streptavidin magnetic beads, and biotinylated target) and tips
onto the robot, a program is run. The selection process, automated by the robot,
goes as follows: RNA pool is incubated in the presence, of biotinylated target
conjugated to streptavidin magnetic beads. After incubation, the magnets on the
magnetic bead separator are raised, and the beads (now bound by pool RNA-the
selected nucleic acids) are pulled out of solution. Thus, the beads can be
washed, leaving only RNA bound to targets attached to beads. These RNA molecules
are reverse transcribed, reamplified. via PCR, and the PCR DNA is in vitro
transcribed into RNA to be used in iterative rounds of selection.
[0111] The Bioworks method for in vitro selection. This scripted programming
method contains all movements necessary in order to facilitate automated
selection. This includes all physical movements to be coordinated, and also
communication statements. For instance, five rounds of automated selection
against a single target requires over 5,000 separate movements in x, y, z, t
coordinate space. Additionally, the method also holds all relevant measurements,
offsets, and integrated equipment data necessary to prevent physical collisions
and permit concerted communication between devices.
[0112] "Beads on filler" selections. While the vast majority of manual
selections have been performed on nitrocellulose-based filters, a small few have
also been performed on solid surfaces, such as beads. A novel selection scheme
was developed whereby selection is performed on magnetic beads that are placed
on nitrocellulose filters, and washed as the bead is the selection target
itself. This method allows for much greater specificity of selection, thereby
promoting `winning` molecules to amplify in greater number, and thus reduce the
overall amount of rounds necessary to complete the selection procedure. Manual
selection does not involve a combination of surfaces to enhance selection. An
alternative method is to take the magnetic beads, or nucleic acids attached to
beads using methods other than beads, and running buffer over the beads and
through a filter. It has been found that a complete filter washing step provides
improved performance in the selection due to decreased background. One example
of the automation of such a methods would be to remove, e.g., nucleic acids
attached to the beads by placing the beads in a 96-well plate with a filtered
bottom, the beads washed with buffer followed by subsequent elution of the
target nucleic acids.
[0113] Cross-contamination avoidance. The introduction of contaminating species
of nucleic acid strands in a manual selection may be commonplace. This is
especially true if selection is done against multiple targets in parallel, and
also when a researcher reuses the same pool for different selection tools.
Contaminating species have been shown in the past to interfere with a manual
selection such that it could not be completed. Automated in vitro selection
takes steps to minimizing and/or eliminate the possibility of
cross-contamination between pools and targets. Movement of the mechanical pod
along the 18 work surface is unidirectional when carrying potentially
contaminating material. This movement away from .degree.Clean' things and only
towards items that have already been exposed to replicons greatly diminishes the
possibility of cross-contaminating reactions. The only circumstance in which the
pod reverses its direction is to acquire a new, clean pipette tip. Additionally,
the reagent trays were sealed with aluminum foil for a physical barrier between
the environment and unexposed reagents. See FIG. 14, a layout of the robotic
work surface that reduces cross-contamination.
[0114] Using this method the present inventors have successfully selected
aptamers against a number of protein targets, including Cyt18, lysozyme, the
signaling kinase MEKI, Rho from a thermophilic bacteria, and the Herpes virus
US11 protein. The robot can perform 6 rounds of selection/day versus individual
protein targets, and selections are typically completed within 12-18 rounds. In
each instance, selected populations showed a substantially greater affinity for
their cognate proteins than naive populations. In addition, when selected
populations were sequenced one or more sequence families typically predominated.
Sequence families are a hallmark of a successful selection, and indicate that
the robotic method faithfully recapitulates manual selection methods.
[0115] The use of beads for target immobilization allows automated selection to
be generalized to virtually any target class. For example, small organic
molecules could be directly conjugated to beads. Similarly, antibodies could be
conjugated to beads and in turn could be used to capture macromolecular
structures, such as viruses or cells.
[0116] In another embodiment, the robotic workstation can be used for the
selection of nucleic acid catalysts. For example, a DNA library was incubated
that contained an iodine leaving group at its 5' end with a DNA oligonucleotide
substrate containing a 3' phosphorothioate nucleophile and a 5' biotin. The
biotin can be captured on beads bearing streptavidin, and the beads can in turn
be captured either by magnetic separation or by filtration. Any molecules in the
DNA pool that ligate themselves to the biotinylated substrate are co-immobilized
with that substrate. Immobilized species can be directly amplified following
transfer to the integrated thermal cycler. The inclusion of a biotin on one of
the primers used for amplification allows single-stranded DNA to be prepared by
denaturation of the non-biotinylated strand in base, followed by neutralization
of the solution. While this method has proved successful for the selection of
deoxyribozyme 19 ligases, variations could also have been attempted. For
example, the biotinylated DNA oligonucleotide substrate could have been
pre-immobilized on beads, and the DNA pool incubated with the beads. In this
instance, any molecules in the DNA pool that ligate themselves to the substrate
will also be directly captured on the beads.
[0117] The use of beads for catalyst immobilization immediately suggests other
selection protocols. For example, nucleic acid cleavases could be selected by
first immobilizing a pool on the beads, then selecting for those species that
cleave themselves away from the beads. Similarly, nucleic acid Diels-Alder
synthetases may be selected by first immobilizing a diene on the beads, creating
a nucleic acid pool that terminates in a dienophile, and selecting for those
species that most efficiently con ugate the diene and dienophile.
[0118] This method can be applied to the selection of RCANAs. The ability to use
a robotic workstation to select for ligases demonstrates that it is possible to
select for regulatable ribozymes. For example, the selection protocols described
in this invention can be altered so that ligases that immobilized themselves in
the absence of a protein effector are removed from the random sequence
population, while ligases that subsequently immobilized themselves once a
protein effector were added are transferred to the integrated thermal cycler,
amplified, and used for additional rounds of selection. This automated selection
methods for regulatable ribozymes can readily be extended to other classes or
catalysts than ligases, such as cleavases or Diels Alder synthetases by those
skilled in the art.
[0119] Automating selection greatly diminishes human error in the actual
pipetting and biological manipulations. While programming the robot is often not
a trivial task, and can be time-consuming, automated selection is far faster and
more efficient than manual selection. The scicntist's time is thus put to better
use preparing samples and analyzing data, rather than performing the actual
selection. Additionally, automated selection may include real-time monitoring
methods (e.g., molecular beacons, TaqMan) and software that can make intelligent
decisions based on real-time monitoring.
E. Chip-based RCANA for in vitro Detection Applications
[0120] Regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids are especially useful for
biosensor applications. For example, different protein-regulated catalytically
active nucleic acids may be anchored to a surface, such as wells in a multi-well
plate. Mixtures of analytes and fluorescently tagged substrates are added to
each well. Where cognate effectors are present, the protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids will covalently attach the fluorescent tags
to themselves. Where protein-regulated catalytically active nucleic acids have
not been activated by effectors, the tagged substrates will be washed out of the
well. After reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of co-immobilized
fluorescent tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were present during
the reaction.
[0121] In one embodiment of the invention, the reporter may be a fluorescent
tag, but it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic particle, or any number of
detectable particles. Additionally, the protein-regulated catalytically active
nucleic acids may be attached to beads or non-covalently linked to a surface
rather than covalently linked to a surface.
[0122] One advantage of this method is that covalent immobilization of reporters
(as opposed to non-covalent immobilization, as in ELISA assays) allows stringent
wash steps to be employed. Additionally, ribozyme ligases have the unique
property of being able to transduce effectors into nucleic acid templates that
can be amplified, affording an additional boost in signal prior to detection.
[0123] Another advantage is that the analytical methods of the present invention
do not rely on binding per se, but only on transient interactions. The present
invention requires mere recognition rather than a binding event that must be
physically isolated, providing a potential advantage of protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids over antibodies. That is, even low affinities
are sufficient for activation and subsequent detection, especially if
individual, immobilized protein-regulated catalytically active nucleic acids are
examined (i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
[0124] FIG. 16 schematically depicts one way to anchor aptazymes to a chip for a
particular embodiment of the present invention. In this schematic, different
ribozyme ligases (indicated by different colored allosteric sites) are shown
immobilized on beads in wells, and mixtures of analytes (differentiated by shape
and color) and fluorescently tagged substrates have been added to each well. In
the middle panel of this figure, where 21 cognate effectors are present (same
color analyte and allosteric site), the aptazymes will covalently attach the
fluorescent tags to themselves. Where RCANA have not been activated by
effectors, the tagged substrates are washed out of the well. In the last panel
of FIG. 16, after reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of
co-immobilized fluorescent tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were
present during the reaction.
[0125] In the embodiment of FIG. 16, the reporter may be a fluorescent tag, but
it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic particle, or any number of detectible
particles. Additionally, the RCANA could be immobilized on beads, but they could
also be directly attached to a solid support via covalent bonds.
[0126] One advantage of this embodiment is that covalent immobilization of
reporters allows stringent wash steps to be employed. This can be distinguished
from to non covalent immobilization assays such as ELISA assays where stringent
washing may destroy the signal. An additional advantage is that ribozyme ligases
have the unique property of being able to transduce effectors into templates
that can be amplified, affording an additional boost the in signal prior to
detection.
[0127] Additionally, the method of the present invention contemplates that the
RCANA construct may be amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Finally, the
method contemplates that the RCANA oligonucleotide sequence of the construct may
include RNA nucleotides, so that the method further includes reverse
transcription of the RNA using reverse transcriptase to produce a DNA
complementary to the RNA template.
[0128] Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the RCANA that substantially
stabilize them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The
analytical methods of the present invention do not rely on binding per se, but
only on transient interactions. The present invention requires mere recognition
rather that actual binding, thus providing a potential advantage of RCANA over
antibodies. That is, even low affinities are sufficient for activation and
subsequent detection, especially if individual immobilized RCANA are examined
(i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
F. In vitro Engineering and Selection of RCANAs for in vivo Applications
[0129] The above discussion has disclosed methods for the in vitro creation of
RCANAs, and has disclosed some of their in vitro applications. In the following
section we describe the design, engineering, and in vitro selection of RCANAs
for in vivo applications.
[0130] This invention utilizes ribozymes that can alter the level of mRNAs in a
cellular system. In one embodiment, the ribozyme can be a self splicing intron,
such as the group I intron. This ribozyme can be inserted into a gene. If the
ribozyme is active, it will catalyze the a self-splicing reaction that removes
itself from the gene, allowing accurate expression of the gene. In another
embodiment, the ribozyme may be one that acts in trans to cleave a mRNA. Again,
changing the activity of the ribozyme will lead to a change in the level of the
mRNA in the cell, thereby altering the level of the protein coded by that gene.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that other ribozyme activities may be
used. For the purpose of illustration, the invention is now described in detail
with the use of the self splicing intron.
[0131] The intron is first modified to function as an RCANA. Briefly, the
methods described above can be used generate RCANA introns. A pool of potential
RCANA introns is created by randomizing one or more regions of the intron. The
randomized region optionally includes one or more residues from the catalytic
core. A selection protocol is then developed that allows the active RCANA
introns to be partitioned from the inactive ones. For example, the active RCANA
introns can be partitioned from the inactive RCANA intron based on the mobility
in gel electrophoresis. Other methods will be clear to those skilled in the art.
Based on this partitioning method, an iterative procedure of partitioning and
subsequent amplification of the RCANA introns is used to select RCANAs that are
regulated by an effector. With the exception of the partitioning method, this
procedure is essentially identical to the selection described about for RCANA
ligases.
[0132] As an alternative to the selection of RCANA introns, it is also possible
to engineer RCANA introns. For example, one of the stem-loop structures of the
intron can be replaced by an aptamer for the desired effector. Interaction of
the effector-with this engineered RCANA intron-will result in a modulation of
the RCANA intron activity. Because an aptamer is different from an regulatory
element (as was detailed above), the 23 present method will, in general, lead to
RCANAs that are regulated by the effector. however, as will be shown in an
example below, an important aspect of the current invention is that this level
of regulation can be adequate for in vivo applications.
G. In vivo Selection and Optimization of RCANAs.
[0133] Here we disclose methods to generate RCANAs by using in vivo selection.
FIG. 4b shows a selection protocol for the Group I P6 RCANA Pool of FIG. 4a.
Positive and negative selections are made in vitro to select Group I RCANA that
are dependent on activator. The selections are described above in Example 2 for
a specific embodiment of the present invention--a theophylline dependent RCANA.
In vivo screens and selections are used to select Group I RCANA that exhibit
strong theophylline-dependence. The selected RCANA are mixed at various ratios
with mutant Group I ribozymes that splice at a low but continuous level to
determine the level at which RCANA can be selected against background. Because
activation domains are often in the form of a stem-loop, the mutations can be
concentrated in a single stem loop structure of the RCANA intron. In an
alternate embodiment, the mutations can include catalytic residues. In yet
another embodiment, the mutations are randomly dispersed in the intron. Finally,
the best theophylline-dependent Group I aptazymes that have been derived by any
of the methods described herein may undergo further selection by partially
randomizing their sequences and selecting for improved in vivo performance.
[0134] Strategies similar to those depicted in FIGS. 4a and 4b may be used to
develop RCANA on any desired effector. Positive and negative in vitro selection
such as depicted in FIG. 4b are described above in Example 2 for a specific
embodiment of the present invention.
[0135] From 10.sup.6 to 10.sup.10 variants can be efficiently transformed as
described herein, sufficient to encompass most variants in the populations
discussed so far. This efficiency of transformation, however, is likely to be
insufficient to encompass a significant fraction of a completely random pool.
Nonetheless, sequences have been selected from completely random expressed pools
that can protect bacteria from bacteriophage infection.
[0136] The above procedure described how to select in vivo RCANAs. A similar
procedure can be used to optimize engineered RCANAs. Residues in the RCANA that
might include the ligand binding region, structural stem-loops, or even
catalytic residues can be mutated. The selection procedure described above is
then used to select for optimized RCANAs.
[0137] Since the rules that govern Group I intron splicing in different gene
contexts are well known to those skilled in the art, the skilled artisan can
remove RCANA introns from one context and modularly insert them into other
genes. Should the efficiency or effector-dependence of intron splicing be
compromised in the new gene, the intron may be reaccommodated to its new genetic
environment by a selectable marker to the interrupted gene of interest and
selecting for an effector-dependent phenotype.
[0138] Similarly, modulation of genes by cleavage is also well known to those
skilled in the art. The skilled artisan can engineer endonucleolytic RCANAs
that, upon activation, cause endonucleolytic cleavage of target nucleic acid.
This endonucleolytic cleavage strategy may be applied to either upregulate or
downregulate target polypeptide synthesis.
[0139] To the extent that aptazymes are self-sufficient, they should also
function in eukaryotic cells, including human cells. Selecting for
effector-dependence may also be performed in eukaryotic cells. Selection in
eukaryotic systems may be performed, e.g., by fusing the gene of interest to a
reporter gene such as GFP or luciferase. Variants of the RCANA that promote
effector-dependent protein production may then be selected using a FACS. A pool
of 10.sup.6 to 10.sup.8 variants may be screened by this procedure, a range
comparable to the bacterial system previously described.
H. In vivo Detection Applications
[0140] Using the present invention, it is possible to activate or repress a
reporter gene (e.g., liciferase or GFP) containing an engineered RCANA in
response to an endogenous protein activator, or a post-translationally modified
form of an endogenous protein activator (e.g., protein kinases such as ERK 1 and
phosphorylated ERK 1). It is also possible to activate or repress a reporter
gene (e.g., luciferase or GFP) containing an engineered RCANA in response to
small molecule effectors (e.g., cyclic AMP, glucose, bioactive peptides,
bioactive nucleic acids, or low molecular weight drugs such as antibiotics,
antineoplastics or the like.). Thus, reporter gene-engineered RCANA constructs
may be used to monitor intracellular levels of proteins, post-translationally
modified forms of proteins or small molecules such as cyclic AMP and the like.
Such applications may be used for high-throughput cell-based assays and screens
for drug leads or for drug optimization and development.
[0141] Bacterial strains such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), and Bacillils
subtilis (B. subtilis), or yeast strains such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S.
cerevisiae), and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe) are transformed with an
expression vector encoding a reporter gene regulated by a RCANA, and these
engineered microbial cell lines are used for cell-based assays and tests for
drug discovery and development. Similarly, standard mammalian cell lines such as
CHO, NIH3T3, 293, and 293T are transfected with appropriate vectors (e.g.,
pCDNA, pCMV, or retrovirus), that are engineered to contain RCANA-regulatable
reporter genes, and these re-engineered cell lines may be used subsequently for
cell-based assays and tests. In another use of the RCANA reporter gene
technology, tumorigenic cell lines such as LNCaP, MCF-7, IMAMB-435, SK-Mel, DLI,
PC3, T47D and the like, may be transfected in vitro with appropriate vectors
encoding an RCANA-regulatable reporter gene. These re-engineered tumorigenic
cell lines may be used in cell-based screens for the discovery and development
anti-neoplastic drugs.
[0142] In another in vivo application, reporter gene-RCANA constructs (e g.,
luciferase or GFP) may be used to generate live animal models for use in drug
development. In one embodiment the RCANA construct may be used in an engineered
tumorigenic cell line to indicate the levels of a target molecule used to
generate a tumor xenograft in nude mice. Mice bearing the tumors derived from
the engineered cell line may then be used to screen for drugs that alter the
level of the target molecule. For example, a transfected MDA-MB-435 line
engineered to express a GFP gene under regulatable control by intron response to
the protein activator phospho-ERK 1 is used to screen for drugs which both
inhibit tumor growth and block formation of phospho-ERK. In another embodiment
of the RCANA intron invention, transgenic mouse models may be generated in which
tissue or cell type specific expression of the reporter gene is controlled by
the effector activated RCANA intron. For example transgenic mice expressing a
phospho-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) specific RCANA regulated GFP gene
under control of the MMTV (mouse mammary tumor virus) promoter would show
expression of GFP in mouse mammary tissue in a phospho-VEGF RTK dependent
manner. Furthermore, these mice may be used to screen compounds for anti-VEGF
RTK activity.
[0143] FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of the
present invention. Exogenous or endogenous activation of Group I intron splicing
is depicted. A reporter gene such as Luciferase or beta-Gal is fused to the gene
of interest which also contains the group I intron (td). Splicing-out of the
Group I intron is induced by an effector, shown in the diagram as a protein, in
this case Cyt18, by the shaded oval. Activation of the RCANA and auto-excision
of the intron results in expression of the reporter gene to detect the desired
reaction. The use of a reporter gene of this embodiment may be suitable for use
in eukaryotic systems.
[0144] FIG. 6 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.
Libraries of candidate exogenous activators (E.sub.1-n) may be generated from a
randomized RCANA pool indicated by the triangle. As in the embodiment of FIG. 5,
a reporter gene is expressed in cells where the exogenous activator activates
the RCANA to release the intron from the gene. As will be known to those of
skill in the art any number of current and future libraries may be used with the
present invention.
[0145] FIG. 7 depicts an alternative embodiment for screening libraries of
exogenous activators. In the embodiment of the present invention of FIG. 7,
Group I introns are induced into trans-splicing. Extracted and amplified introns
are used to transform cells.
[0146] FIG. 8 shows yet another alternative embodiment for screening libraries
of exogenous activators of the present invention. In the embodiment of FIG. 8,
the effector (shaded oval), shown in this illustration as protein Cyt18, is
mutagenized (triangle) to form an effector library. A second effector
(E.sub.1-n) interacts with and activates one or more members of the effector
library. The effector-effector complex is exposed to the gene containing both
the Group I intron and a reporter gene. Cell sorting reveals the cells that
express the reporter gene to indicate successful activation of the RCANA by the
effector-effector complex.
[0147] FIG. 9 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention for
screening for endogenous activators. In this embodiment, an endogenous effector,
in this illustration shown as a protein activator from endogenous or transformed
origin (shaded oval), activates self-splicing of the Group I intron. Cell
sorting is used to reveal the expression of the reporter gene. To protect
against spontaneous auto-excision of the intron, the gene 27 may be transferred
into a different background system such as yeast or E. Coli, for example.
[0148] FIG. 10 depicts an alternative to the embodiment of FIG. 9 to screen for
endogenous activators of the present invention. In FIG. 10, the activator that
is being screened for may include, inter alia, a phosphorylated protein, a
product of ubiquitination, or a protein-protein complex. For example, a protein
activator, shown as the small shaded oval, may phosphorylate an effector such as
Cyt18, shown as a large shaded oval with the phosphorylation indicated by the
shaded rectangle. The phosphorylated effector activates intron self-splicing
with concomitant expression of the reporter gene, shown here for illustration as
Luciferase or beta-Galactosidase.
[0149] FIG. 11 shows yet another embodiment of the present invention to monitor
compounds that perturb cellular metabolism. In this embodiment, a ribozyme
similar to described in FIG. 6, and designated in this diagram by a line with a
triangle is activated by a protein effector, shown as a shaded oval in FIG. 11.
The protein effector may be a phosphoprotein, an induced protein, or a protein
complex, for example. One or more second effectors, designated as a series of
circles, alters the level of or degree of modification of the protein effector.
The source of the second effectors may be endogenous or the effectors may be the
product of a transformation construct used to transform a cell. Alteration of
the level or modification of the protein effector results in an alteration in
the expression of the reporter gene (shown as a dark circle with "lightning
bolts"). The functioning of the gene of interest may thereby be perturbed,
providing information about the function and/or regulation of the gene or gene
product. FIG. 1 describes a method for taking the products of the screen
described in FIGS. 8 and 10 and using them to monitor cellular or metabolic
states.
[0150] FIG. 12 shows a further embodiment of the present invention that provides
a non-invasive readout of metabolic states. An RCANA construct of the present
invention may be introduced to a gene of interest. A protein suppressor from
either an endogenous source from the product of cell transformation activates
self-splicing of the RCANA, leading to expression of the endogenous gene, shown
here again as a dark circle with lightning bolts. Whether or not the gene of
interest is expressed upon release of the RCANA intron from the gene provides
information about the metabolic state of the gene 28 of interest. The embodiment
of the present invention of FIG. 12 thus provides a noninvasive means to
determine the metabolic state of an organism with regard to a gene of interest.
[0151] FIG. 13 depicts a further embodiment of the present invention wherein
endogenous suppressors provide a non-invasive readout of multiple metabolic
states. Multiple protein activators (endogenous or transformed) arc exposed to a
pool of Group I introns of the present invention. The pool comprises introns
with length polymorphisms that are depicted in FIG. 13 by a discontinuity or
break in the line representing the Group I intron (thick line) residing in a
gene of interest (thin line). Activation of the RCANA leads to trans-splicing
among the various polymorphisms. The products of trans-splicing may be extracted
and amplified. Separation of the trans-splicing products by gel clectrophoresis
provides a read out of the protein function or the metabolic pathway. The
readout may even be digitized for analysis.
[0152] In vivo Uses of RCANAs for Gene Therapy
[0153] One important feature of using RCANAs and the method of the present
invention for gene therapies is that regulated introns may be used to control
gene expression, for any of a variety of genes, since the introns may be
inserted into and be engineered to accommodate virtually any gene. Moreover,
since the RCANAs may be engineered to respond to any of a variety of effectors,
the characteristics of the effector (oral availability, synthetic accessibility,
pharmacokinetic properties) may be chosen in advance. The drug is chosen prior
to engineering the target of the drug. In part because of these extraordinary
capabilities, RCANA provide perhaps the only viable route to medically
successful and practical gene therapies. Drugs may be given throughout the
treatment (or lifetime) of a patient who had undergone a single initial gene
therapy. In addition, by making the gene therapy regulatable, the amount of a
gene product may be easily increased or decreased in different individuals at
different times during the treatment by increasing or decreasing the doses of
effectors.
[0154] The present method also includes transforming a cell with the RCANA
construct so that the construct is inserted into a gene of interest. An effector
is provided to activate the RCANA so that administering to the cell an effective
amount of the effector induces the RCANA to splice itself out of the gene to
regulate expression of the gene.
[0155] The method of the present invention contemplates that the RCANA construct
may be a plasmid. The method then further includes transforming the cell with
the plasmid. The method of the present invention also contemplates ligating the
RCANA construct into a vector and transforming the cell with the vector.
DEFlNITIONS
[0156] As used herein, the term "regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid"
or "RCANA" means a ribozyme or nucleic acid enzyme that is regulated by an
effector.
[0157] As used herein, the term "regulatory domain" and "effector domain" are
interchangeable terms meaning the region of effector binding on an RCANA.
[0158] The kinetic parameters of the RCANA may be varied in response to the
amount of an effector, which may be an allosteric effector molecule. just as
allosteric, protein enzymes undergo a change in their kinetic parameters or of
their enzymatic activity in response to interactions with an effector molecule,
the catalytic abilities of RCANAs may be similarly modulated by effectors. As
demonstrated herein, the effectors may be small molecules, proteins, peptides or
molecules that interact with proteins, peptides or other molecules. RCANAs
transduce molecular recognition into catalysis upon interaction with an effector
that interacts with a portion of the RCANA.
[0159] As used herein, the term "effector," "effector molecule," "allosteric
effector" or "allosteric effector molecule" means a molecule or process that
changes the kinetic parameters or catalytic activity of an RCANA.
[0160] As used herein, the term "catalytic residue" refers to residues that when
mutated decrease the activity of the RCANA. Mutating a residue that affects the
catalytic activity of a ribozyme following the selection of the RCANA, may cause
different residues to become sensitive to mutation than in the original
ribozyme. The relative mutational sensitivity of a given "catalytic residue" may
change before and after the selection of the RCANA. These secondary mutations
are also encompassed by the present invention.
[0161] As used herein, the term "aptamer" refers to a nucleic acid that has been
specifically selected to optimally bind to a target ligand. As described above,
it is important to recognize that an aptamer is fundamentally different than an
RCANA.
[0162] As used herein, the term "kinetic parameters" refers to any aspect of the
catalytic activity of the nucleic acid. Changes in the kinetic parameters of a
catalytic RCANA produce changes in the catalytic activity of the RCANA such as a
change in the rate of reaction or a change in substrate specificity. For
example, self-splicing of an intron RCANA out of a gene environment may result
from a change in the kinetic parameters of the RCANA. Similarly, cleavage of an
endonucleolytic RCANA in a gene environment also may result fiom a change in the
kinetic parameters of the RCANA.
[0163] As used herein, the term "catalytic" or "catalytic activity" refers to
the ability of a substance to affect a change in itself or of a substrate under
permissive conditions. As used herein, the term "protein-protein complex" or
"protein complex" refers to an association of more than one protein. The
proteins that make up a protein complex may be associated by functional,
stereochemical, conformational, biochemical, or electrostatic mechanisms. It is
intended that the term encompass associations of any number of proteins.
[0164] As used herein, the term "in vivo" refers to cellular systems and
organisms, e.g., cultured cells, yeast, bacteria, plants and/or animals.
[0165] As used herein the terms "protein", "polypeptide" or "peptide" refer to
compounds comprising amino acids joined via peptide bonds and are used
interchangeably. As used herein, the term "endogenous" refers to a substance the
source of which is from within a cell, cell extract or reaction system.
Endogenous substances are produced by the metabolic activity of, e.g., a cell.
Endogenous substances, however, may nevertheless be produced as a result of
manipulation of cellular metabolism to, for example, make the cell express the
gene encoding the substance.
[0166] As used herein, the term "exogenous" refers to a substance the source of
which is external to a cell, cell extract, or reaction system. An exogenous
substance may nevertheless be internalized by a cell by any one of a variety of
metabolic or induced means known to those skilled in the art.
[0167] As used herein the term "modified base" refers to a non-natural
nucleotide of any sort, in which a chemical modification may be found on the
nucleobase, the sugar, or the polynucleotide backbone or phosphodiester linkage.
[0168] As used herein, the term "gene" means the coding region of a
deoxyribonucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid sequence of a protein. The
term includes sequences located adjacent to the coding region on both the 5'and
3' ends such that the deoxyribonucleotide sequence corresponds to the length of
the full-length mRNA for the protein. The term "gene" encompasses both cDNA and
genomic forms of a gene. A genomic form or clone of a gene contains the coding
region interrupted with non-coding sequences termed "introns" or "intervening
regions" or "intervening sequences." Introns are segments of a gene that are
transcribed into nuclear RNA (hnRNA); introns may contain regulatory elements
such as enhancers. Introns are removed, excised or "spliced out" from the
nuclear or primary transcript; introns therefore are absent in the messenger RNA
(mRNA) transcript. The mRNA functions during translation to specify the sequence
or order of amino acids in a nascent polypeptide.
[0169] In addition to containing introns, genomic forms of a gene may also
include sequences located on both the 5' and 3' end of the sequences that are
present on the RNA transcript. These sequences are referred to as "flanking"
sequences or regions (these flanking sequences are located 5' or 3' to the
non-translated sequences present on the mRNA transcript). The 5' flanking region
may contain regulatory sequences such as promoters and enhancers that control or
influence the transcription of the gene. The 3' flanking region may contain
sequences that direct the termination of transcription, posttranscriptional
cleavage and polyadenylation.
[0170] DNA molecules are said to have "5' ends" and "3' ends" because
mononucleotides are reacted to make oligonucleotides in a manner such that the
5' phosphate of one mononucleotide pentose ring is attached to the 3' oxygen of
its neighbor in one direction via a phosphodiester linkage. Therefore, an end of
an oligonucleotides referred to as the "3' end" if its 5' phosphate is not
linked to the 3' oxygen of a mononucleotide pentose ring and as the "3' end" if
its 3' oxygen is not linked to a 5' phosphate of a subsequent mononucleotide
pentose ring. As used herein, a nucleic acid sequence, even if internal to a
larger oligonucleotide, also may be said to have 5' and 3' ends. In either a
linear or circular DNA molecule, discrete elements are referred to as being
"upstream" or 5' of the "downstream" or 3' elements. This terminology reflects
the fact that transcription proceeds in a 5' to 3' fashion along the DNA strand.
[0171] The term "gene of interest" as used herein refers to a gene, the function
and/or expression of which is desired to be investigated, or the expression of
which is desired to be regulated, by the present invention. In the present
disclosure, the td gene of the T4 bacteriophage is an example of a gene of
interest and is described herein to illustrate the invention. The present
invention may be useful in regard to any gene of any organism, whether of a
prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism.
[0172] The term "hybridize" as used herein, refers to any process by which a
strand of nucleic acid binds with a complementary strand through base pairing.
Hybridization and the strength of hybridization (i.e., the strength of the
association between the nucleic acid strands) is impacted by such factors as the
degree of complementary between the nucleic acids, stringency of the conditions
involved, the melting temperature of the formed hybrid, and the G:C (or U:C for
RNA) ratio within the nucleic acids.
[0173] The terms "complementary" or "complementarity" as used herein, refer to
the natural binding of polynucleotides under permissive salt and temperature
conditions by base-pairing. For example, for the sequence "A-G-T" binds to the
complementary sequence "T-C-A". Complementarity between two single-stranded
molecules may be partial, in which only some of the nucleic acids bind, or it
may be complete when total complementarity exists between the single stranded
molecules. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands has
significant effects on the efficiency and strength of hybridization between
nucleic acid strands. This is of particular importance in amplification
reactions, which depend upon binding between nucleic acids strands.
[0174] The term "homology," as used herein, refers to a degree of
complementarity. There may be partial homology or complete homology (i.e.,
identity). A partially complementary sequence is one that at least partially
inhibits an identical sequence from hybridizing to a target nucleic acid; it is
referred to using the functional term "substantially homologous." The inhibition
of hybridization of the completely complementary sequence to the target sequence
may be examined using a hybridization assay (Southern or Northern blot, solution
hybridization and the like) under conditions of low stringency. A substantially
homologous sequence or probe will compete for and inhibit the binding (i.e., the
hybridization) of a completely homologous sequence or probe to the target
sequence under conditions of low stringency. This is not to say that conditions
of low stringency are such that non-specific binding is permitted; low
stringency conditions require that the binding of two sequences to one another
be a specific (i.e., selective) interaction. The absence of non-specific binding
may be tested by the use of a second target sequence which lacks even a partial
degree of complementarity (e.g., less than about 30% identity); in the absence
of non-specific binding, the probe will not hybridize to the second
non-complementary target sequence. When used in reference to a single-stranded
nucleic acid sequence, the term "substantially homologous" refers to any probe
which can hybridize (i.e., it is the complement to the single-stranded nucleic
acid sequence under conditions of low stringency as described).
[0175] As known in the art, numerous equivalent conditions may be employed to
comprise either low or high stringency conditions. Factors such as the length
and nature (DNA, RNA, base composition) of the sequence, nature of the target
(DNA, RNA, base composition, presence in solution or immobilization, etc.), and
the concentration of the salts and other components (e.g, the presence or
absence of formamide, dextran sulfate and/or polyethylene glycol) are considered
and the hybridization solution may be varied to generate conditions of either
low or high stringency different from, but equivalent to, the above listed
conditions.
[0176] As used herein the term "stringency" is used in reference to the
conditions of temperature, ionic strength, and the presence of other compounds
such as organic solvents, under which nucleic acid selections are conducted.
With "high stringency" conditions a relatively small number of nucleic acid
catalysts will be selected from a random sequence pool, while under "low
stringency conditions" a larger number of nucleic acid catalysts will be
selected from a random sequence pool.
[0177] Numerous equivalent conditions may be employed to comprise low or high
stringency conditions; factors such as the length of incubation of the reaction,
the presence of competitive inhibitors of the reaction, the buffer conditions
under which the reaction is carried out, the temperature at which the reaction
is carried out are considered and the hybridization solution may be varied to
generate conditions of low stringency selection different from, but equivalent
to, the above listed conditions.
[0178] The term "antisense," as used herein, refers to nucleotide sequences that
are complementary to a specific DNA or RNA sequence. The term "antisense strand"
is used in reference to a nucleic acid strand that is complementary to tile
"sense" strand. Antisense molecules may be produced by any method, including
synthesis by ligating the gene(s) of interest in a reverse orientation to a
viral promoter that permits the synthesis of a complementary strand. Once
introduced into a cell, the transcribed strand combines with natural sequences
produced by the cell to form duplexes. These duplexes then block either the
further transcription or translation. In this manner, mutant phenotypes may also
be generated. The designation "negative" is sometimes used in reference to the
antisense strand, and "positive" is sometimes used in reference to the sense
strand. The term is also used in reference to RNA sequences that are
complementary to a specific RNA sequence (e g., mRNA). Included within this
definition are antisense RNA ("asRNA") molecules involved in genetic regulation
by bacteria.
[0179] Antisense RNA may be produced by any method, including synthesis by
splicing the gene(s) of interest in a reverse orientation to a viral promoter
that permits the synthesis of a coding strand. Once introduced into an embryo,
this transcribed strand combines with natural mRNA produced by the embryo to
form duplexes. These duplexes then block either the further transcription of the
mRNA or its translation. In this manner, mutant phenotypes may be generated. The
term "antisense strand" is used. in reference to a nucleic acid strand that is
complementary to the "sense" strand. The designation. (i.e., "negative") is
sometimes used in reference to the antisense strand with the designation (+)
sometimes used in reference to the sense (i.e., "positive") strand.
[0180] A gene may produce multiple RNA species that are generated by
differential splicing of the primary RNA transcript. cDNAs that are splice
variants of the same gene will contain regions of sequence identity or complete
homology (representing the presence of the same exon or portion of the same exon
on both cDNAs) and regions of complete non-identity (for example, representing
the presence of exon "A" on cDNA 1 wherein cDNA 2 contains exon "B" instead).
Because the two cDNAs contain regions of sequence identity they will both
hybridize to a probe derived from the entire gene or portions of the gene
containing sequences found on both cDNAs; the two splice variants are therefore
substantially homologous to such a probe and to each other.
[0181] "Transformation," as defined herein, describes a process by which
exogenous DNA enters and changes a recipient cell. It may occur under natural or
artificial conditions using various methods well known in the art.
Transformation may rely on any known method for the insertion of foreign nucleic
acid sequences into a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell. The method is
selected based on the host cell being transformed and may include, but is not
limited to, viral infection, electroporation, lipofection, and particle
bombardment. Such "transformed" cells include stably transformed cells in which
the inserted DNA is capable of replication either as an autonomously replicating
plasmid or as part of the host chromosome. The term "transfection" as used
herein refers to the introduction of foreign DNA into eukaryotic cells.
[0182] Transfection may be accomplished by a variety of methods known to the art
including, e.g., calcium phosphate-DNA co-precipitation, DEAE-dextran-mediated
transfection, polybrene-mediated transfection, electroporation, microinjection,
liposome fusion, lipofection, protoplast fusion, retroviral infection, and
biolistics. Thus, the term "stable transfection" or "stably transfected" refers
to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the
transfected cell. The term "stable transfectant" refers to a cell that has
stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA. The term also encompasses
cells that transiently express the inserted DNA or RNA for limited periods of
time. Thus, the term "transient transfection" or "transiently transfected"
refers to the introduction of foreign DNA into a cell where the foreign DNA
fails to integrate into the genome of the transfected cell. The foreign DNA
persists in the nucleus of the transfected cell for several days. During this
time the foreign DNA is subject to the regulatory controls that govern the
expression of endogenous genes in the chromosomes. The term "transient
transfectant" refers to cells that have taken up foreign DNA but have failed to
integrate this DNA.
[0183] As used herein, the term "selectable marker" refers to the use of a gene
that encodes an enzymatic activity and which confers the ability to grow in
medium lacking what would otherwise be an essential nutrient (e.g., the HIS3
gene in yeast cells); in addition, a selectable marker may confer resistance to
an antibiotic or drug upon the cell in which the selectable marker is expressed.
A review of the use of selectable markers in mammalian cell lines is provided in
Sambrook, J. et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1989),pp. 16.9-16.15.
[0184] As used herein, the term "reporter gene" refers to a gene that is
expressed in a cell upon satisfaction of one or more contingencies and which,
upon expression, confers a detectable phenotype to the cell to indicate that the
contingencies for expression have been satisfied. For example, the gene for
Luciferase confers a luminescent phenotype to a cell when the gene is expressed
inside the cell. In the present invention, the gene for Luciferase may be used
as a reporter gene such that the gene is only expressed upon the splicing out of
an intron in response to an effector. Those cells in which the effector
activates splicing of the intron will express Luciferase and will glow.
[0185] As used herein, the term "vector" is used in reference to nucleic acid
molecules that transfer DNA segment(s) from one cell to another. The term
"vehicle" is sometimes used interchangeably with "vector." The term "vector" as
used herein also includes expression vectors in reference to a recombinant DNA
molecule containing a desired coding sequence and appropriate nucleic acid
sequences necessary for the expression of the operably linked coding sequence in
a particular host organism. Nucleic acid sequences necessary for expression in
prokaryotes usually include a promoter, an operator (optional), and a ribosome
binding site, often along with other sequences. Eukaryotic cells are known to
utilize promoters, enhancers, and termination and polyadenylation signals.
[0186] As used herein, the term "amplify", when used in reference to nucleic
acids refers to the production of a large number of copies of a nucleic acid
sequence by any method known in the art. Amplification is a special case of
nucleic acid replication involving template specificity. Template specificity is
frequently described in terms of "target" specificity. Target sequences are
"targets" in the sense that they are to be sorted out from other nucleic acid.
Amplification techniques have been designed primarily for this sorting out.
[0187] As used herein, the term "primer" refers to an oligonucleotide, whether
occurring naturally as in a purified restriction digest or produced
synthetically, which is capable of acting as a point of initiation of synthesis
when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product
which is complementary to a nucleic acid strand is induced, (i.e., in the
presence of nucleotides and an inducing agent such as DNA polymerase and at a
suitable temperature and pH). The primer may be single stranded for maximum
efficiency in amplification but may alternatively be double stranded. If double
stranded, the primer is first treated to separate its strands before being used
to prepare extension products. The primer must be sufficiently long to prime the
synthesis of extension products in the presence of the inducing agent. The exact
length of the primers will depend on many factors, including temperature, source
of primer and the use of the method.
[0188] As used herein, the term "probe" refers to an oligonucleotide (i.e., a
sequence of nucleotides), whether occurring naturally as in a purified
restriction digest or produced synthetically, recombinantly or by PCR
amplification, which is capable of hybridizing to another oligonucleotide of
interest. A probe may be single-stranded or double-stranded. Probes are useful
in the detection, identification and isolation of particular gene sequences. It
is contemplated that any probe used in the present invention will be labeled
with any "reporter molecule," so that is detectable in any detection system,
including, but not limited to enzyme (e.g. ELISA, as well as enzyme-based
histochemical assays), fluorescent, radioactive, and luminescent systems. It is
not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular detection
system or label.
[0189] As used herein, the term "target" when used in reference to the
polymerase chain reaction, refers to the region of nucleic acid bounded by the
primers used for polymerase chain reaction. Thus, the "target" is sought to be
sorted oat from other nucleic acid sequences. A "segment" is defined as a region
of nucleic acid within the target sequence. As used herein, the term "polymerase
chain reaction" ("PCR") refers to the method of K.B. Mullis U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,683,195, 4,683,202, and 4,965,188, hereby incorporated by reference, which
describe a method for increasing the concentration of a segment of a target
sequence in a mixture of genomic DNA without cloning or purification. This
process for amplifying the target sequence consists of introducing a large
excess of two oligonucleotide primers to the DNA mixture containing the desired
target sequence, followed by a precise sequence of thermal cycling in the
presence of a DNA polymerase. The two primers are complementary to their
respective strands of the double stranded target sequence.
[0190] To effect amplification, the mixture is denatured and the primers then
annealed to their complementary sequences within the target molecule. Following
annealing, the primers are extended with a polymerase so as to form a new pair
of complementary strands. The steps of denaturation, primer annealing and
polymerase extension can be repeated many times (i.e., denaturation, annealing
and extension constitute one "cycle"; there can be numerous "cycles") to obtain
a high concentration of an amplified segment of the desired target sequence. The
length of the amplified segment of the desired target sequence is determined by
the relative positions of the primers with respect to each other, and therefore,
this length is a controllable parameter. By virtue of the repeating aspect of
the process, the method is referred to as the "polymerase chain reaction"
(hereinafter "PCR"). Because the desired amplified segments of the target
sequence become the predominant sequences (in terms of concentration) in the
mixture, they are said to be PCR amplified".
[0191] With PCR, it is possible to amplify a single copy of a specific target
sequence in genomic DNA to a level detectable by several different
methodologies, e.g., hybridization with a labeled probe; incorporation of
biotinylated primers followed by avidin-enzyme conjugate detection;
incorporation of .sup.32 P-labeled deoxynucleotide triphosphates, such as DCTP
or DATP, into the amplified segment. In addition to genomic DNA, any
oligonucleotide sequence can be amplified with the appropriate set of primer
molecules. In particular the amplified segments created by the PCR process
itself are, themselves, efficient templates for subsequent PCR amplifications.
[0192] As used herein, the term "metabolic pathway" means a physical or chemical
process found in a living organism by which a substance is produced and
maintained, e.g., anabolism, and also the transformation by which energy is made
available for the use of a living organism, e.g., catabolism.
[0193] As used herein, the term "bioproduct" means a substance produced by a
physical or chemical process, the components of which are found in a living
organism(s).
[0194] As used herein, the term "biosynthetic process" means a process by which
a substance is produced using the physiological process found in a living
organism.
EXAMPLE 1: GPITH1P6
Engineering of an RCANA for In vivo Detection Applications
[0195] The first example illustrates how to make an RCANA construct and
demonstrates self-splicing of the RCANA out of a gene in response to an effector
molecule.
1 Construction of a RCANA. Oligos GplWt3.129: 5-TAA TCT TAC CCC GGA ATT (SEQ ID
NO:1) ATA TCC AGC TGC ATG TCA CCA TGC AGA GCA GAC TAT ATC TCC AAC TTG TTA AAG
CAA GTT GTC TAT CGT TTC GAG TCA CTT GAC CCT ACT CCC CAA AGG GAT AGT CGT TAG-3'
and GpITh1P6.131: 5-GCC TGA GTA TAA GGT GAC TTA TAC TTG TAA TCT (SEQ ID NO:2)
ATC TAA ACG GGG AAC CTC TCT AGT AGA CAA TCC CGT GCT AAA TTA TAC CAG CAT CGT CTT
GAT GCC CTT GGC AGA TAA ATG CCT AAC GAC TAT CCC TT-3'
[0196] were annealed and extended in a 30 .mu.l reaction containing 100 pmoles
of each oligo, 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM MgCl.sub.2, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM
DTT, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 45 units of AMV reverse transcriptase (RT: Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.) at 37.degree. C. for 30 min. The
extension reaction was diluted 1 to 50 in H.sub.2O.
[0197] A PCR reaction containing 1 .mu.l of the extension dilution, 500 mM KCl,
100 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 9.0), 1% Triton.RTM. X-100, 15 mM MgCl.sub.2, 0.4 .mu.M of
GpIWt1.75: 5'-GAT AAT ACG ACT CAC TAT AGG GAT CAA CGC TCA GTA GAT GTT TTC TTG
GGT TAA
[0198] TTG AGG CCT GAG TAT AAG GTG-3' (SEQ ID NO:3)),0.4 .mu.M of
Gp1Wt4.89:5'-CTT AGC TAC AAT ATG AAC TAA CGT AGC ATA TGA CGC AAT ATT AAA CGG TAG
CAT TAT GTT CAG ATA AGG TCG TTA ATC TTA CCC CGG AA-3' (SEQ ID NO:4), 0.2 mM each
dNTP and 1.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.) was thermocycled
20 times under the following regime: 94.degree. C. for 30 sec, 45.degree. C. for
30 sec, 72.degree. C. for 1 min. The PCR reaction was precipitated in the
presence of 0.2 M NaCl and 2.5 volumes of ethanol and then quantitated by
comparison with a molecular weight standard using agarose gel electrophoresis.
[0199] The RCANA construct was transcribed in a 10 .mu.l high yield
transcription reaction (AmpliScribe from Epicentre, Madison, Wis. The reaction
contained 500 ng PCR product, 3.3 pmoles of .sup.32P [.sup.32P]UTP,
1.times.AmpliScribe transcription buffer, 10 mM DTT, 7.5 mM each NTP, and 1
.mu.l AmpliScribe T7 polymerase mix. The transcription reaction was incubated at
37.degree. C. for 2 h. One unit of RNase free-DNase was added and the reaction
returned to 37.degree. C. for 30 min. The transcription was then purified on a
6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel to separate the full length RNA from incomplete
transcripts and spliced products, eluted and quantitated spectrophotometrically.
[0200] In vitro Assay. The RNA (4 pmoles/12 .mu.l H.sub.2O) was heated to
94.degree. C. for 1 min then cooled to 37.degree. C. over 2 min in a
thermocycler. The RNA was divided into 2 splicing reactions (9 .mu.l each)
containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.45), 500 mM KCl and 15 mM MgCl.sub.2, Plus or
minus theophylline (2 mM). The reactions were immediately placed on ice for 30
min. GTP (1 mM) was added to the reactions (final volume of 10 .mu.l) and the
reactions were incubated at 37.degree. C. for 2 h.
[0201] The reactions were terminated by the addition of stop dye (10 .mu.l) (95%
formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.5% xylene cyanol, and 0.5% bromophenol blue). The
reactions were heated to 70.degree. C. for 3 min and 10 .mu.l was
electrophoresed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The gel was dried,
exposed to a phosphor screen and analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics
Phosphorimager (Sunnyvale, Calif.).
[0202] Activation was determined from the amount of circular intron in each
reaction. Circularized introns migrate slower than linear RNA and can be seen as
the bands above the dark bands of linear RNA in the +Theo lanes of the gels of
FIGS. 2a and 2b.
[0203] In vivo Screening of Group I Aptazymes. The RCANA constructs as well as
the wild type and a negative control were ligated into a vector that contains
the T4 td intron with Eco R I and Spe I flanking the P6 region, transformed and
mi
|