|








| |
Scientific
Publications - Work Done by Microbiology Reader Bioscreen C
| United States Patent Application |
2003 0104520 |
| Kind Code |
A1 |
| Ellington, Andrew D. ; et al. |
June 5, 2003 |
Regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids
Abstract
Compositions and methods are provided to make, isolate, characterize and use
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids (RCANA). RCANA may be used for
regulating gene expression and in assays to detect the presence of ligands or to
detect activation by an effector of an RCANA bound to a solid support such as a
chip or multi-well plate. Also disclosed are compositions and methods for
automating the selection procedures of the present invention.
| Inventors: |
Ellington, Andrew D.; (Austin, TX) ;
Hesselberth, Jay; (Austin, TX) ; Marshall, Kristin A.; (Cambridge,
MA) ; Robertson, Michael P.; (Austin, TX) ; Sooter, Letha;
(Austin, TX) ; Davidson, Eric; (Austin, TX) ; Cox, J. Colin;
(Austin, TX) ; Reidel, Timothy; (Austin, TX) |
| Correspondence Name and Address: |
Edwin S. Flores, Esq.
GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP
3000 Thanksgiving Tower
1601 Elm Street
Dallas
TX
75201
US
|
| Serial No.: |
883119 |
| Series Code: |
09 |
| Filed: |
June 14, 2001 |
| U.S. Current Class: |
435/69.1; 435/320.1; 435/325;
514/7; 530/327; 530/328; 530/329; 536/23.5 |
| U.S. Class at Publication: |
435/69.1; 435/320.1; 435/325;
530/327; 530/328; 530/329; 514/7; 536/23.5 |
| Intern'l Class: |
A61K 038/08; A61K 038/10; C07K
007/08; C07K 007/06; C07H 021/04; C12P 021/02; C12N 005/06 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A polynucleotide that is regulated by a polypeptide comprising: a
regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide, wherein the peptide interacts
with the polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity.
2. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide is further defined as
being a protein.
3. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises a peptide of
between about 7 and 20 amino acids.
4. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises a peptide of
between about 7 and 12 amino acids.
5. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the catalytic activity of the nucleic
acid is specific for a nucleic acid target sequence.
6. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the catalytic activity of the nucleic
acid is regulated by the interaction of the nucleic acid with an effector.
7. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide comprises RNA.
8. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide comprises DNA
9. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide is at least
partially single stranded.
10. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide is at least
partially double stranded.
11. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide comprises at least
one modified base.
12. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the peptide is endogenous.
13. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the peptide is exogenous.
14. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the peptide comprises a
phosphorylated peptide.
15. A nucleic acid that is regulated by an effector comprising: a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid, generated by the modification of at least one
catalytic residue.
16. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the catalytic activity of the nucleic
acid is specific for a nucleic acid target sequence.
17. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the catalytic activity of the nucleic
acid is regulated by the interaction of the nucleic acid with an effector.
18. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid comprises RNA.
19. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid comprises DNA.
20. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid is at least partially
single stranded.
21. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid is at least partially
double stranded.
22. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid comprises at least
one modified base.
23. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector is endogenous.
24. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector is exogenous.
25. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector comprises a protein.
26. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector comprises a
pharmaceutical agent.
27. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector comprises a protein
complex.
28. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector comprises a peptide.
29. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector a phosphorylated peptide.
30. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the effector comprises a
dephosphorylated peptide.
31. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a reaction
that causes the expression of a target gene to be up-regulated.
32. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a reaction
that causes the expression of a target gene to be down-regulated.
33. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid is used to detect at
least one exogenous effector from a library of candidate exogenous effector
molecules.
34. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid and the effector form
a nucleic acid-effector complex.
35. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid and the effector is a
molecule that forms an nucleic acid-effector complex and the nucleic
acid-effector complex acts synergistically to affect the catalytic activity of
the nucleic acid-effector complex.
36. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a ligation
reaction with an oligonucleotide substrate.
37. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a reaction
that adds a non-oligonucleotide substrate.
38. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a reaction
that adds biotin to the nucleic acid.
39. The nucleic acid of claim 15, wherein the nucleic acid catalyses a cleavage
reaction with an oligonucleotide substrate.
40. The nucleic acid of claim 15, in which the kinetic parameters of nucleic
acid catalysis are altered in the presence of one or more effector-effectors
that acts on the effector molecule that interacts with the nucleic acid.
41. The nucleic acid of claim 15, in which the kinetic parameters of nucleic
acid catalysis are altered in the presence of theophylline.
42. The nucleic acid of claim 15, in which the kinetic parameters of nucleic
acid catalysis are altered in the presence of a supermolecular structure.
43. The nucleic acid of claim 15, in which the kinetic parameters of nucleic
acid catalysis are altered in the presence of a supermolecular structure that
comprises a virus particle.
44. The nucleic acid of claim 15, in which the kinetic parameters of nucleic
acid catalysis are altered in the presence of a supermolecular structure that
comprises a cell wall.
45. A nucleic acid comprising: a gene; a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid inserted within the gene; wherein the presence of an effector
causes the nucleic acid to catalyze a reaction.
46. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic reaction is a
self-splicing reaction.
47. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic reaction is a ligation
reaction.
48. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic reaction is a
trans-cleavage reaction.
49. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic activation of the
nucleic acid leads to changes in expression of the gene.
50. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic activation of the
nucleic acid leads to changes in expression of one or more genes.
51. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic activation of the
nucleic acid leads to changes in expression of the mRNA of the gene.
52. The nucleic acid of claim 45, wherein the catalytic activation of the
nucleic acid leads to changes in expression of the protein encoded by the gene.
53. A nucleic acid segment comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid comprising one or more catalytic nucleotides, selected from a pool
of nucleic acids in which at least one of the catalytic residues has been
randomized.
54. A regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid segment comprising: an
effector domain; and a nucleic acid catalyst domain in which one or more
catalytic residues of the nucleic acid catalyst have been randomized; wherein
the kinetic parameters of the catalytic domain are regulated by an effector that
interacts with the effector domain.
55. A method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: randomizing at least one nucleotide in the catalytic
domain of a catalytically active nucleic acid to create a nucleic acid pool; and
removing from the nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain.
56. The method of claim 55, further comprising the step of adding an effector to
the remaining pool of nucleic acids.
57. The method of claim 55, further comprising the steps of adding an effector
to the remaining nucleic acids, wherein the effector acts on the nucleic acids
to alter the catalytic activities of the nucleic acids.
58. The method of claim 55, further comprising the step of purifying the
isolated nucleic acid.
59. The method of claim 55, further comprising the step of sequencing the
isolated nucleic acid.
60. The method of claim 55, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under high stringency conditions.
61. The method of claim 55, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under moderate stringency conditions.
62. The method of claim 55, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under low stringency conditions.
63. The method of claim 55, where the target is an mRNA molecule.
64. The method of claim 56, where the effector is a protein.
65. The method of claim 56, where the effector is a peptide.
66. The method of claim 56, where the effector is a phosphoprotein.
67. The method of claim 56, where the effector is a glycoprotein.
68. The method of claim 56, where the effector is light.
69. The method of claim 56, where the effector is visible light.
70. The method of claim 56, where the effector is a magnet.
71. The method of claim 55, where the target is a metabolic reaction.
72. The method of claim 55, in which nucleic acids with altered catalytic
specificity are selected in the presence of an effector.
73. The method of claim 55, in which nucleic acids with altered catalytic
activities are selected in the absence of an effector.
74. The method of claim 55, in which nucleic acids with altered catalytic
activities are serially selected in the presence and the absence of an effector.
75. The method of claim 55, the effector domain comprises a random sequence
pool.
76. The method of claim 55, the effector domain comprises a partially randomized
sequence pool.
77. A method of making a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: contacting a pool of nucleic acids, the nucleic acids
having a catalytic and an effector domain, wherein at least one nucleotide in
the catalytic domain of the nucleic acids has been randomized; removing from the
nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of
the catalytic domain; adding an effector protein to the remaining nucleic acids;
and isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain.
78. A method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: randomizing at least one nucleotide in the catalytic
domain of a catalytically active nucleic acid to create a nucleic acid pool;
removing from the nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain; adding an effector molecule to the
nucleic acids; and isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain.
79. A method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid
having a catalytic and an effector domain, comprising the steps of: randomizing
at least one nucleotide in the catalytic domain of the nucleic acid to create a
nucleic acid pool; removing from the nucleic acid pool those randomized nucleic
acids that interact with the catalytic target of the catalytic domain; adding an
effector to the nucleic acids; and isolating the nucleic acids that interact
with the catalytic target of the catalytic domain.
80. An automated method of isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acid having a catalytic and an effector domain, comprising the steps of: (a)
randomizing at least one nucleotide in the catalytic domain of the nucleic acid
to create a nucleic acid pool; (b) removing from the nucleic acid pool those
randomized nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain; (c) adding an effector to the nucleic acids; (d) adding an
effector-effector that specifically interacts with the effector; and (e)
isolating the nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain; and (f) repeating steps (a) through (e).
81. A method of detection of a target using a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid comprising the steps of. contacting the a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid with the target; and measuring the effect of
the interaction between the a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid and
the target.
82. A method of modifying a target using a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid comprising the steps of: providing a regulatable, catalytically
active nucleic acid capable of target specific modification; and modifying the
target under conditions that cause a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acid-specific activity.
83. A biosensor comprising: a solid support; and at least one regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid, wherein the kinetic parameters of the nucleic
acid on a target vary in response to the interaction of an effector molecule
with the nucleic acid; wherein the at least one regulatable, catalytically
active nucleic acid is immobilized on the support.
84. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the reaction is machine readable.
85. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the solid support comprises a multiwell
plate.
86. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the solid support comprises a surface
plasmon resonance sensor.
87. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the at least one regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acids is covalently immobilized on the solid
support.
88. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the catalytic reaction produces a
detectable signal.
89. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the catalytic reaction is the attachment
of a tag to the immobilized nucleic acids to produce the signal.
90. The biosensor of claim 83, wherein the substrate is further defined as
containing known nucleic acid sequences tags and the nucleic acids are sorted on
the surface of the substrate based on non-covalent hybridization to sequence
tags.
91. A biosensor comprising: a solid support; and at least one regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acids, wherein the kinetic parameters of the
nucleic acids on a target vary in response to the interaction of an effector
molecule with the nucleic acid; wherein catalytic targets of the catalytic
domain is immobilized on the support.
92. A biosensor comprising: a solid support; and at least one regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acids, wherein the kinetic parameters of the
nucleic acids on a target vary in response to the interaction of an effector
molecule with the nucleic acid; wherein the effector is immobilized on the
support.
93. A method of selecting a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: contacting a pool of nucleic acids, the nucleic acids
having a catalytic and an effector domain, wherein at least one nucleotide in
the catalytic domain of the nucleic acids has been randomized; removing from the
nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of
the catalytic domain; adding an effector to the remaining nucleic acids; and
isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain; introducing the nucleic acids into a host cell; and measuring
the catalytic activity of the nucleic acid upon exposure of the host cell to the
effector.
94. The method of claim 93, further comprising the step of purifying the
isolated nucleic acid.
95. The method of claim 93, further comprising the step of sequencing the
isolated nucleic acid.
96. The method of claim 93, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under high stringency conditions.
97. The method of claim 93, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under moderate stringency conditions.
98. The method of claim 93, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under low stringency conditions.
99. The method of claim 93, where the target is an mRNA molecule.
100. The method of claim 93, where the effector is a protein.
101. The method of claim 93, where the effector is a peptide.
102. The method of claim 93, where the effector is a phosphoprotein.
103. The method of claim 93, where the effector is a glycoprotein.
104. The method of claim 93, where the effector is light.
105. The method of claim 93, where the effector is visible light.
106. The method of claim 93, where the effector is a magnet.
107. The method of claim 93, in which nucleic acids with altered catalytic
activities are serially selected in the presence and the absence of the
effector.
108. The method of claim 93, the effector domain comprises a completely random
sequence pool.
109. The method of claim 93, the effector domain comprises a partially
randomized sequence pool.
110. A method of selecting a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: contacting a pool of nucleic acids, the nucleic acids
having a catalytic and an effector domain, wherein at least one nucleotide in
the catalytic domain of the nucleic acids has been randomized; removing from the
nucleic acid pool those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of
the catalytic domain; adding an effector to the remaining nucleic acids; and
isolating those nucleic acids that interact with the catalytic target of the
catalytic domain; introducing the nucleic acids into a host cell; and measuring
the catalytic activity of the nucleic acid upon exposure of the host cell to the
effector.
111. The method of claim 110, further comprising the step of purifying the
isolated nucleic acid.
112. The method of claim 110, further comprising the step of sequencing the
isolated nucleic acid.
113. The method of claim 110, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under high stringency conditions.
114. The method of claim 110, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under moderate stringency conditions.
115. The method of claim 110, wherein the step of removing the nucleic acids is
under low stringency conditions.
116. The method of claim 110, where the target is an mRNA molecule.
117. The method of claim 110, where the effector is a protein.
118. The method of claim 110, where the effector is a peptide.
119. The method of claim 110, where the effector is a phosphoprotein.
120. The method of claim 110, where the effector is a glycoprotein.
121. The method of claim 110, where the effector is light.
122. The method of claim 110, where the effector is visible light.
123. The method of claim 110, where the effector is a magnet.
124. The method of claim 110, in which nucleic acids with altered catalytic
activities are serially selected in the presence and the absence of the
effector.
125. The method of claim 110, the effector domain comprises a completely random
sequence pool.
126. The method of claim 110, the effector domain comprises a partially
randomized nucleotide sequence.
127. A method of detecting a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
comprising the steps of: isolating a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acid; creating a construct in which the nucleic acid is in position to regulate
the expression of a reporter gene; introducing the construct into a host cell;
and measuring the catalytic activity of the nucleic acid upon exposure of the
host cell to an effector.
128. A vector comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide,
wherein the peptide molecule interacts with the polynucleotide to affect its
catalytic activity.
129. A vector comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
generated by the modification of at least one catalytic residue.
130. A method of modulating expression of a nucleic acid, the method comprising
providing a polynucleotide that is regulated by a peptide, the polynucleotide
comprising a regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide, wherein the
peptide interacts with the polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity; and
contacting the polynucleotide with the peptide, thereby modulating expression of
a nucleic acid.
131. The method of claim 130, wherein the polynucleotide is provided in a cell.
132. The method of claim 131, wherein the cell is provided in vitro.
133. The method of claim 131, wherein the cell is provided in vivo.
134. The method of claim 131, wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell.
135. The method of claim 131, wherein the cell is a eukaryotic cell.
136. A method of modulating expression of a nucleic acid, the method comprising
the steps of: providing a nucleic acid that is regulated by an effector, the
nucleic acid comprising: a regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid,
wherein the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid molecule includes at
least one modified catalytic residue; and contacting the nucleic acid with the
effector, thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid.
Description
[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Serial No. 60/212,097,
filed Jun. 15, 2000.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to the field of catalytic nucleic
acids and in particular to regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids that
modulate their kinetic parameters in response to the presence of an effector.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Ribozymes are oligonucleotides of RNA that can act like enzymes and are
sometimes called RNA enzymes. Generally, they have the ability to behave like an
endoribonuclease, catalyzing the cleavage of RNA molecules. The location of the
cleavage site is highly sequence specific, approaching the sequence specificity
of DNA restriction endonucleases. By varying conditions, ribozymes can also act
as polymerases or dephosphorylases.
[0004] Ribozymes were first described in connection with Tetrahymena
thermophilia. The Tetrahymena rRNA was shown to contain an intervening sequence
(IVS) capable of excising itself out of a large ribosomal RNA precursor. The IVS
is a catalytic RNA molecule that mediates self-splicing out of a precursor,
whereupon it converts itself into a circular form. The Tetrahymena IVS is more
commonly known now as the Group I Intron.
[0005] Regulatable ribozymes have been described, wherein the activity of the
ribozyme is regulated by a ligand-binding moiety. Upon binding the ligand, the
ribozyme activity on a target RNA is changed. Regulatable ribozymes have only
been described for small molecule ligands such as organic or inorganic
molecules. Regulatable ribozymes that are controlled by proteins, peptides, or
other macro-molecules.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present invention includes a regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acids (RCANA), wherein the catalytic activity of the RCANA is regulated
by an effector. The RCANA of the present invention are, therefore, regulatable
in that their activity is under the control of a second portion of the RCANA.
Just as allosteric protein enzymes undergo a change in their kinetic parameters
or of their enzymatic activity in response to interactions with an effector, the
catalytic abilities of the RCANA may similarly be modulated by the effector(s).
Thus, the present invention is directed to RCANA that transduce molecular
recognition into catalysis.
[0007] As will become apparent below, RCANA are more robust than allosteric
protein enzymes in several ways: (1) they can be selected in vitro, which
facilitates the engineering of particular constructs; (2) the levels of
catalytic modulation are much greater for RCANA than for protein enzymes; and
(3) since RCANA are nucleic acids, they can potentially interact with the
genetic machinery in ways that protein molecules may not.
[0008] It should be noted that the methods described herein may include any type
of nucleic acid. For example, these methods are not limited to RNA-based RCANA,
but also encompass DNA RCANA and RNA or DNA RCANA. Furthermore, the methods can
be applied to any catalytic activity the ribozymes are capable of carrying out.
For example, the methods are not limited to ligases or splicing reactions, but
could also encompass other ribozyme classes. The methods are also not limited to
protein or peptide ligands, but also include other molecular species, such as
ions, small molecules, organic molecules, metabolites, sugars and carbohydrates,
lipids and nucleic acids. The methods may also be extended to effectors that are
not molecules, such as heat or light or electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, the
methods are not limited to ligand-induced conformational changes, but could also
take into account `chimeric` catalysts in which residues essential for chemical
reactivity were provided by both the nucleic acid and the ligand, in concert.
[0009] The effector may be a peptide, a polypeptide, a polypeptide complex, or a
modified polypeptide or peptide. The effector may even be, e.g., an enzyme or
even light (such as visible light) or even a magnet. The effector may be
activated by a second effector that acts on the first effector (also referred to
herein as an effector-effector), which may be an inorganic or an organic
molecule. The polypeptide, peptide or polypeptide complex can be either
endogenous, i.e., derived from the same cell type as the polynucleotide, or
exogenous, i.e., derived from a cell type different than the cell from which the
polynucleotide is derived.
[0010] The polypeptide or peptide may be phosphorylated or dephosphorylated.
Alternatively, the effector may include a pharmaceutical agent. In some
embodiments, the nucleic acid catalyzes a reaction that causes the expression of
a target gene to be up-regulated. In other embodiments, the nucleic acid
catalyzes a reaction that causes the expression of a target gene to be
down-regulated. If desired, the nucleic acid may be used to detect at least one
exogenous effector from a library of candidate exogenous effector molecules. In
some embodiments, the nucleic acid and the effector form a nucleic acid-effector
complex.
[0011] In some embodiments, the kinetic parameters of nucleic acid catalysis are
altered in the presence of a supermolecular structure, e.g., a viral particle or
a cell wall. The nucleic acid may further include a regulatory element that can
recognize a target molecule of interest. The nucleic acid may in addition
include a transducer element that transmits information from the regulatory
element to the catalytically active region of the nucleic acid.
[0012] The invention also includes a biosensor that includes a solid support on
which at least one regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid is disposed.
The kinetic parameters of the nucleic acid on a target vary in response to the
interaction of an effector molecule with the nucleic acid. The regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid may be immobilized on the support and the
reaction may be machine-readable. The solid support may include, e.g., a
multiwell plate, a surface plasmon resonance sensor. Regulatable, catalytically
active nucleic acid may be covalently or non-covalently immobilized on the solid
support. In some embodiments, the catalytic reaction produces a detectable
signal. The substrate may include at least 10 regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acids, at least 100 regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids, at
least 1000 regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids, at least 10,000
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids or even at least 100,000
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids.
[0013] Protein and Peptide RCANA. The present invention includes RCANA with
catalytic activity that is regulated by a protein or peptide. One embodiment of
the present invention involves the in vitro selection of RCANA that are
regulated by proteins. A selection scheme for RCANA dependent on protein
cofactors has been developed.
[0014] This invention allows the selection of protein-dependent RCANA, which are
reagents that can be useful in a variety of applications. For example,
protein-dependent RCANA can be used: (1) in chips for the acquisition of data
about whole proteomes, (2) as in vitro diagnostic reagents to detect proteins
specific to disease states, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or viral
proteins, (3) as sentinels for the detection of biological warfare agents, (4)
as elements in cell-based assays or animal models for drug development studies
or (5) as regulatory elements in gene therapies, as described herein. Initially,
many protein targets may prove refractive to selection. However, many
derivatives of the base method can be developed, to deal with novel targets or
target classes.
[0015] Modification of Catalytic Residues of RCANA. In one embodiment of this
invention, the RCANA is generated by the modification of at least one catalytic
residue. One of the unique features of the present selection protocol relative
to others that have previously been published is that the present invention
randomizes not only a domain that is pendant on the catalytic core, but a
portion of the catalytic core itself. Thus, the selection for ligand-dependence
not only yields species that bind to ancillary regions of the RCANA, but that
may help stabilize the catalytic core of the RCANA.
[0016] Also provided by the invention is a method of isolating a regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid created by randomizing at least one nucleotide
in the catalytic domain of a catalytically active nucleic acid to create a
nucleic acid pool. The nucleic acid pool whose nucleic acids interact with the
catalytic target of the catalytic domain are removed. The method further may
also include the step of adding an effector to the remaining pool of nucleic
acids. In some embodiments, the method may also include the step of adding an
effector to the remaining nucleic acids, wherein the effector acts on the
nucleic acids to alter the catalytic activities of the nucleic acids. The method
may include optionally the step of purifying the isolated nucleic acid, and, if
desired the step of sequencing the isolated nucleic acid. In various
embodiments, the step of removing the nucleic acids is under high stringency
conditions, moderate stringency conditions, or low stringency conditions.
[0017] Automated Selection of RCANA. The invention further includes the
automation of in vitro selection, and a mechanized system that executes both
common and modified in vitro selection procedures. Automation facilitates the
execution of this procedure, accomplishing in hours-to-days what once
necessitated weeks-to-months. Additionally, the mechanized system attends to
other technical obstacles not addressed in "common" in vitro selection procedure
(e.g., specialized robotic manipulation to avoid cross-contamination). The
automation methods are generalizable to a number of different types of
selections, including selections with DNA or modified RNA, selections for
ribozymes and selections for phage-displayed or cell-surface displayed proteins.
[0018] Automating selection greatly diminishes human error in the actual
pipetting and biological manipulations. While programming the robot is often not
a trivial task, and can be time consuming, automated selection is far faster and
more efficient than manual selection. Time is used preparing samples and
analyzing data, rather than performing the actual selection. Additionally,
automated selection may include real-time monitoring methods (e.g., molecular
beacons, TaqMan.RTM.) into the selection procedure and software that can make
intelligent decisions based on real-time monitoring.
[0019] In vitro sensing (or detection) applications. The current invention also
provides for the use of RCANA for detection of a wide variety molecular species
in vitro. For example, RCANA may be anchored to a chip, such as wells in a
multi-well plate. Mixtures of analytes and fluorescently tagged substrates are
added to each well. Where cognate effectors are present, the RCANA will
covalently attach the fluorescent tags to themselves. Where RCANA have not been
activated by effectors, the tagged substrates are washed out of the well. After
reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of co-immobilized fluorescent
tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were present during the reaction.
The reporter may be a fluorescent tag, but it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic
particle, or any number of detectible particles. Additionally, the RCANA may be
immobilized on beads, but they could also be directly attached to a solid
support via covalent bonds.
[0020] One advantage of this embodiment is that covalent immobilization of
reporters (as opposed to non covalent immobilization, as in ELISA assays) allows
stringent wash steps to be employed. Additionally, ribozyme ligases have the
unique property of being able to transduce effectors into templates that may be
amplified, affording an additional boost in signal prior to detection.
[0021] Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the RCANA that substantially
stabilize them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The
analytical methods of the present invention do not rely on binding per se, but
only on transient interactions. The present invention requires mere recognition
rather that actual binding, providing a potential advantage of RCANA over
antibodies. That is, even low affinities are sufficient for activation and
subsequent detection, especially if individual immobilized RCANA are examined
(i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
[0022] Expression of RCANA in cells. The RCANAs of the present invention may
also be expressed inside cells. The RCANAs of the present invention that are
expressed inside a cell are not only responsive to a given effector, but are
also able to participate in genetic regulation or responsiveness. In particular,
self-splicing introns can splice themselves out of genes in response to
exogenous or endogenous effector molecules.
[0023] The present invention includes RCANA constructs that may be inserted into
a gene of interest, e.g., a gene targeting expression vector. The RCANA sequence
provides gene specific recognition as well as modulation of the RCANA's kinetic
parameters. The kinetic parameters of the RCANA vary in response to an effector.
Specifically, in the case of RCANA that performs self splicing in the presence
of the effector, the RCANA may splices itself out of the gene in response to the
effector to regulate expression of the gene.
[0024] In another aspect, the invention includes a method of modulating
expression of a nucleic acid by providing a polynucleotide that is regulated by
a peptide. The polynucleotide may be a regulatable, catalytically active
polynucleotide, in which the peptide interacts with the polynucleotide to affect
its catalytic activity. The polynucleotide is contacted with the peptide,
thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid. The polynucleotide may be
provided in a cell, and the cell may be, e.g., provided in vitro or in vivo and
may be a prokaryotic cell or a even a eukaryotic cell.
[0025] The present invention also includes an RCANA construct with a regulatable
oligonucleotide sequence having a regulatory domain, such that the kinetic
parameters of the RCANA on a target gene vary in response to the interaction of
an effector with the regulatory domain.
[0026] In vivo sensing (or detection) applications. It is possible to activate
or repress a reporter gene (e.g., luciferase) containing an engineered intron in
response to an endogenous activator. In this way, luciferase-engineered intron
constructs may be used to monitor intracellular levels of proteins or small
molecules such as cyclic AMP. This method may be used for in vivo measurements
in both cellular systems, such as cell culture, and in whole organisms, such as
animal models. Such applications may be used for high-throughput screening. If a
particular intracellular signal (e.g., the production of a tumor repressor) was
desired, compound libraries for pharmacophores that induce the signal (the tumor
repressor) are screened for activation of the reporter gene. Thus, the
information desired is changed or morphed into the detection of glowing cells.
[0027] Gene therapy applications. Similarly, a gene can be activated or
repressed in response to an exogenously introduced effector (drug) for gene
therapy. The RCANA may be used for gene expression up regulation (increasing
production of the gene product) or down regulation (decreasing the production of
the gene product). The construct of one embodiment of the present invention
provides a DNA oligonucleotide coding for a catalytic domain and effector
binding domain. The advantages of the nucleic acid-based technology of the
present invention include, e.g., the ability to continually modulate gene
expression with a high degree of sensitivity without additional gene therapy
interventions.
[0028] In another aspect, the invention includes a method of modulating
expression of a nucleic acid in a cell by providing a polynucleotide that is
regulated by an effector, e.g., a peptide. The polynucleotide may be a
regulatable, catalytically active polynucleotide, in which the peptide interacts
with the polynucleotide to affect its catalytic activity. The polynucleotide is
contacted with the peptide, thereby modulating expression of a nucleic acid. The
polynucleotide may be provided in a cell, and the cell may be, e.g., provided in
vitro or in vivo and may be a prokaryotic cell or a even a eukaryotic cell.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0029] For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the
present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the
invention along with the accompanying figures in which corresponding numerals in
different figures refer to corresponding parts and in which:
[0030] FIG. 1 is a depiction of the secondary structure of the Group 1
theophylline-dependent (td) intron of bacteriophage T4 (wild type);
[0031] FIG. 2a is a photograph of a gel showing activation of the GpITh1P6.131
aptamer construct, together with a graphical representation of the gel, of one
embodiment of the present invention;
[0032] FIG. 2b is a photograph of a gel showing activation of GpITh2P6.133
aptamer construct, together with a graphical representation of the gel of one
embodiment of the present invention.
[0033] FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of an in vivo assay system for group I
introns of one embodiment of the present invention.
[0034] FIG. 4a depicts a portion of the P6 region of the Group I ribozyme joined
to the anti-theophylline aptamer by a short randomized region to generate a pool
of aptazymes of the present invention.
[0035] FIG. 4b is a schematic depiction of a selection protocol for the Group I
P6 Aptazyme Pool of FIG. 4a.
[0036] FIG. 5 is a diagram of one embodiment of the present invention depicting
exogenous or endogenous activation of Group I intron splicing;
[0037] FIG. 6 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention
depicting a strategy for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0038] FIG. 7 is a diagram of an alternative embodiment of the present invention
for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0039] FIG. 8 is a diagram of yet another alternative embodiment of the present
invention for screening libraries of exogenous activators;
[0040] FIG. 9 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention for
screening for endogenous activators;
[0041] FIG. 10 is a diagram of an alternative to the embodiment of FIG. 9 of the
present invention to screen for endogenous activators;
[0042] FIG. 11 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention to
screen for compounds that perturb cellular metabolism;
[0043] FIG. 12 is a diagram of a further embodiment of the present invention
that provides a non-invasive readout of metabolic states;
[0044] FIG. 13 is a diagram of yet a further embodiment of the present invention
wherein endogenous suppressors provide a non-invasive readout of multiple
metabolic states;
[0045] FIG. 14 is a schematic depiction of an example of a work surface for
automatic selection procedures of one embodiment of the invention;
[0046] FIG. 15a is an illustration of the LI ligase aptazyme construct of one
embodiment of the present invention;
[0047] FIG. 15b is an illustration of a modified LI ligase aptazyme construct of
FIG. 15a of the present invention;
[0048] FIG. 15c is a schematic diagram of a selection protocol of one embodiment
of the present invention;
[0049] FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of a method to anchor an aptazyme
construct of the present invention to a solid support in one embodiment of the
present invention;
[0050] FIGS. 17(a-d) show the LI ligase was the starting point for pool design;
[0051] FIG. 18(a-d) shows the progression of the L1-N50 selections;
[0052] FIG. 19(a & b) shows protein-dependent regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acid sequences and structures;
[0053] FIG. 20 demonstrates the ribozyme activity with inactivated protein
samples;
[0054] FIG. 21 demonstrates an aptamer competition assays;
[0055] FIG. 22 shows the binding and ligation activity as a function of protein
concentration;
[0056] FIG. 23 is a flow chart of a method for negative and positive selection
of RCANA;
[0057] FIG. 24 shows the progress of the L1-N50 Rev selection;
[0058] FIG. 25 (a & b) shows the theophylline-dependent td group I intron
constructs of the present invention;
[0059] FIG. 26 shows the design of an FMN-dependent td nucleic acid intron
splicing construct;
[0060] FIGS. 27(a-c) show the relative growth curves of theophylline-dependent
in vivo growth;
[0061] FIG. 28 shows 3-Methylxanthine dependent in vivo growth;
[0062] FIG. 29 (a & b) shows a schematic of ribozyme ligase array;
[0063] FIG. 30 shows the results of a regulatable, catalytically active ligase
array;
[0064] FIG. 31 shows the titrations of individual allosteric ribozyme ligases.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0065] While the making and using of various embodiments of the present
invention are discussed in detail below, the present invention provides many
applicable inventive concepts that may be embodied in a wide variety of specific
contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of
specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the
invention.
[0066] The present invention includes compositions or matter, methods and
automation that permit the creation, isolation, identification, characterization
and optimization of regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids. Furthermore,
it includes methods to use RCANA for in vitro sensing (or detection), in vivo
sensing (or detection), and gene therapy. Regulatable, catalytically active
nucleic acids selected by the method of the present invention also have
advantages over other biopolymers that might be used for sensing or gene
regulation. Regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids are more robust than
allosteric protein enzymes in several ways: (1) they can be selected in vitro
(facilitating the engineering of particular constructs); (2) the levels of
catalytic modulation are much greater than those typically observed with protein
enzymes; and (3) since regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids are
nucleic acids, they can potentially interact with the genetic machinery in ways
that protein molecules may not.
[0067] The method is not limited to RNA pools, but may also encompass DNA pools
or modified RNA pools. Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids that substantially stabilize
them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The method is not
limited to ligases, but could also encompass other ribozyme classes. The method
is not limited to protein-induced conformational changes, but could also take
into account `chimeric` catalysts in which residues essential for chemical
reactivity were provided by both the nucleic acid and the protein in concert.
Initially, many protein targets may prove refractive to selection. Many
derivatives of the base method can be developed, however, to deal with novel
targets or target classes.
[0068] A. Protein Dependent RCANA
[0069] Effector-dependent ribozymes have been shown to be responsive to small
organic compounds, such as ATP and theophylline. The present inventors
recognized the need for effector-dependent ribozymes, or as used herein,
"regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids" that are responsive to larger
molecules, such as, e.g., peptides or proteins. The peptides, proteins or other
large molecules may be provided from endogenous sources (e.g., expressed within
a cell or cell extract), or exogenous sources (added or expressed in a cell or
cell extract).
[0070] In order to understand the present invention, it is important to
understand that previous attempts to make catalytically active nucleic acids
that interact and respond to a large effector, by the inventors and others, have
failed. Initially, attempts were made to generate protein-dependent ribozymes by
the addition of aptamers (known binding sequences) to ribozymes (catalytically
active domains). This design and method was unsuccessful in providing
regulatable nucleic acids. Next, attempts were made to generate
protein-dependent ribozymes by adding random sequence regions between an aptamer
(binding) and a ribozyme (catalytic) and selecting for effector-dependence.
These attempts were also unsuccessful. Next, the inventors attempted to generate
protein-dependent ribozymes by adding a large random sequence region to the
catalytic cores of ribozymes and selecting for effector-dependence. These
attempts were also unsuccessful. In other words, all previously detailed methods
for the generation of ribozymes that were dependent on small organic compounds
were unsuccessful for generating ribozymes that were dependent on proteins.
[0071] To date, the present inventors have selected a number of protein- and
peptide-dependent ribozyme ligases. One example is the isolation of a
protein-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid with an
activity that was increased in a standard assay by 75,000-fold in the presence
of its cognate protein effector, tyrosyl tRNA synthetase from Neurospora
mitochondria (Cyt18). The Cyt18-dependent ribozyme was not activated by
non-cognate proteins, including other tRNA synthetases.
[0072] A protein-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid was
also created and selected with an activity that was increased by 3,500-fold in
the presence of its cognate protein effector, hen egg white lysozyme. The
lysozyme-dependent ribozyme was not activated by most non-cognate proteins,
including T4 lysozyme, but was activated by a UVery closely related protein,
turkey egg white lysozyme. Moreover, the protein-dependent ribozyme was
inhibited by a RNA binding species that specifically bound to lysozyme. In other
words, the activation of these protein-dependent ribozymes was highly specific.
[0073] A peptide-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids was
also created and isolated with activity was increased by 18,000-fold in the
presence of its cognate peptide effector, the arginine-rich motif (ARM) from the
HIV-1 Rev protein. The Rev-dependent nucleic acid was not activated by other
ARMs from other viral proteins, such as HTLV-I Rex. Using the present invention,
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids may be developed that are
regulated by any of a vast number of proteins.
[0074] As will be clear from the continued description, protein dependent RCANAs
are useful in a variety of applications. For example, protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids can be used (1) for the acquisition of data
about whole proteomes, (2) as in vitro diagnostic reagents to detect proteins
specific to disease states, such as prostate-specific antigen or viral proteins,
(3) as sentinels for the detection of biological warfare agents, or (4) as
regulatory elements in gene therapies.
[0075] B. Modification of Residues in Catalytic Domain
[0076] In one embodiment, the present invention randomizes a portion of the
catalytic core itself, not necessarily a domain that is pendant on the catalytic
core. One example for selection using the present invention was using the L1
ligase. The catalytic core of the L1 ligase has been mapped by deletion analysis
and by partial randomization and re-selection. FIG. 15a depicts the LI ligase
that was the starting point for pool design. Stems A, B, and C are indicated.
The shaded region contains the catalytic core and ligation junction. Primer
binding sites are shown in lower case, an oligonucleotide effector required for
activity is shown in italics, and the ligation substrate is bolded. The `tag` on
the ligation substrate can be varied, but was biotin in the exemplary selection
described herein. The LI pool contains 50 random sequence positions and overlaps
with a portion of the ribozyme core. In FIG. 15b, Stem B was reduced in size and
terminated with a stable GNRA tetraloop, but stem A was unchanged.
[0077] A pool was synthesized in which the random sequence region spanned the
catalytic core. Protein-dependent ribozymes were selected from this random
sequence pool by selecting for the ability to ligate an oligonucleotide tag in
the presence of a protein effector followed by capturing the oligonucleotide tag
on an affinity matrix, followed by amplification in vitro or in vivo. Because
the catalytic core has been randomized, the selection for protein-dependence not
only yields species that may bind to ancillary regions of the ribozyme, but
species in which the protein effector actually helps to organize the catalytic
core of the ribozyme.
[0078] Selection for protein-dependence from a pool in which at least a portion
of the catalytic core of the ribozyme is randomized differs from selection for
protein-dependence from a pool in which the catalytic core is not randomized.
For example, the catalytic core of the protein-dependent ribozymes that was
selected differed substantially from the catalytic core of the original ribozyme
and the catalytic core of other, non-protein-dependent ribozymes selected based
on the original ribozyme.
[0079] FIG. 15a depicts the LI ligase that was the starting point for pool
design in the Cyt18 RCANA selection, as an example of a protein-activated
regulated, catalytically active nucleic acid. Stems A, B, and C are indicated.
The shaded region contains the catalytic core and ligation junction. Primer
binding sites are shown in lower case, an oligonucleotide effector required for
activity is shown in italics, and the ligation substrate is bolded. The `tag` on
the ligation substrate can be varied, but was biotin in the exemplary selection
described herein. The LI pool contains 50 random sequence positions and overlaps
with a portion of the ribozyme core. In FIG. 15b, Stem B was reduced in size and
terminated with a stable GNRA tetraloop, but stem A was unchanged.
[0080] Because one or more residues in the catalytic core have been randomized,
the effectors may add essential catalytic residues for a given reaction. That
is, both the effector molecule and the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic
acids contribute a portion of the active site of the ribozyme. For example,
using the method of the present invention a ribozyme and an effector molecule
that would only carry-out poorly an enzymatic function independently may perform
that enzymatic function upon interaction with one another. As such, a
regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid that contributes a guanosine and
an adenosine and a protein effector that contributes a histidine together form a
complex that has greater activity than either of the individual compounds. Using
the methods disclosed herein it is possible to identify a chimeric
effector:ribozyme (e.g., a protein:RNA complex) active site that would lead to
catalysis. The invention describes ribozymes that have a detectable, basal
chemical reactivity, and that the presence of the effector modulates this basal
chemical reactivity. It is for this reason that the present invention differs
significantly from other inventions which have claimed protein:RNA complexes in
which no basal catalytic activity exists in the ribozyme or protein alone.
[0081] C. Selection of RCANA
[0082] FIG. 15c schematically shows the following selection scheme: the RNA pool
was incubated with a biotinylated tag and reactive variants were removed from
the population. The remaining species were again incubated with a biotinylated
tag in the presence of the target (for example the protein Cyt18). Reactive
variants were removed from the population and preferentially amplified by
reverse transcription, PCR, and in vitro transcription.
[0083] Ligand-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids
selected by this method differ from functional nucleic acids selected from
random sequence pools. Selection for ligand-dependence requires a selection for
catalytic activity as opposed to a selection for binding. Therefore,
protein-dependent, regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids are not
aptamers. The composition of matter of a selected protein-dependent ribozyme
will be different than the composition of matter of a selected aptamer. For
example, the sequence of the lysozyme-dependent ribozyme is different from the
sequence of anti-lysozyme aptamers. An important feature of the present
invention is that the regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acids disclosed
herein only required recognition rather than selected or enhanced binding
ability. For example, the affinity of lysozyme for the naive, unselected RNA
pool is identical to the affinity of lysozyme for the selected, regulatable,
catalytically active nucleic acid. The only difference is that the way in which
lysozyme is recognized by the regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids
leads to activation, while for the pool as a whole non-specific binding does not
lead to activation. In other words, binding is a concomitant but secondary
function of selection for regulatability; that is, the regulatable ribozymes
disclosed herein may bind the effector or target very poorly, but upon
interaction the activity of the ribozyme may nonetheless be modulated.
[0084] D. Automated Selection of RCANA
[0085] Robotic workstations have become essential to high-throughput
manipulations of biomolecules, such as in high-throughput screening for drugs
with a particular mechanism of action. The invention also includes the
automation of in vitro selection procedures, and a mechanized system that
executes both common and modified in vitro selection procedures. Automation
facilitates the execution of this procedure, accomplishing in hours to days what
once necessitated weeks to months. In particular, the present inventors have
adapted a robotic workstation to the selection of aptamers and ribozymes.
However, the automation methods are generalizable to a number of different types
of selections, including selections with DNA or modified RNA, selections for
ribozymes, and selections for phage-displayed or cell-surface proteins.
[0086] In short, in vitro selection involves several components: generation of a
random sequence pool, sieving the random sequence pool for nucleic acid species
that bind a given target or catalyze a given reaction, amplification of the
sieved species by a combination of reverse transcription, the polymerase chain
reaction, and in vitro transcription. Beyond the generation of the random
sequence pool, each of these steps can potentially be carried out by a robotic
workstation. The pool can be pipetted together with a target molecule. If the
target is immobilized on a magnetic bead, then the nucleic acid:target complex
can be sieved from solution using an integrated magnetic bead collector.
Finally, selected nucleic acid species can be eluted from the complex and
amplified via a series of enzymatic steps that include the polymerase chain
reaction carried out via an integrated thermal cycler.
[0087] There are many potential ways in which binding species can be sieved from
a random sequence population. However, not all of these methods are amenable to
automated selection. For example, to select aptamers, others have suggested that
targets can be immobilized onto microtitre plates and binding species can be
sieved by panning. The present inventors have had little success with this
method, likely because panning is a relatively inefficient, low stringency
method for sieving. Instead, the present inventors have discovered that when
targets are immobilized on beads and mixed with a random sequence pool, binding
species can be efficiently sieved from non-binding species by filtration of the
beads. Beads can be readily manipulated by pipetting, allowing for the facile
recovery and elution of the binding species, which are then amplified and
carried into subsequent rounds of selection. This method differs from the
magnetic bead capture method, and can be carried out with much higher
stringency. This method is novel, and has not previously been used for in vitro
selection experiments.
[0088] FIG. 14 depicts schematically an exemplary work surface for yet another
embodiment of the present invention: automated selection. See, J. C. Cox, et
al., Automated RNA Selection Biotechnol. Prog., 14, 845 850, 1998.
[0089] Base protocol. Automated selection involves several, sequential automated
steps. Several modules are placed on the robotic work surface, including a
magnetic bead separator, and enzyme cooler, and a thermal cycler. After manually
preparing reagents and preloading those reagents (including random pool RNA,
buffers, enzymes, streptavidin magnetic beads, and biotinylated target) and tips
onto the robot, a program is run. The selection process, automated by the robot,
goes as follows: RNA pool is incubated in the presence, of biotinylated target
conjugated to streptavidin magnetic beads. After incubation, the magnets on the
magnetic bead separator are raised, and the beads (now bound by pool RNA--the
selected nucleic acids) are pulled out of solution. Thus, the beads can be
washed, leaving only RNA bound to targets attached to beads. These RNA molecules
are reverse transcribed, reamplified via PCR, and the PCR DNA is in vitro
transcribed into RNA to be used in iterative rounds of selection.
[0090] The Bioworks method for in vitro selection. This scripted programming
method contains all movements necessary in order to facilitate automated
selection. This includes all physical movements to be coordinated, and also
communication statements. For instance, five rounds of automated selection
against a single target requires over 5,000 separate movements in x, y, z, t
coordinate space. Additionally, the method also holds all relevant measurements,
offsets, and integrated equipment data necessary to prevent physical collisions
and permit concerted communication between devices.
[0091] "Beads on filter" selections. While the vast majority of manual
selections have been performed on nitrocellulose-based filters, a small few have
also been performed on solid surfaces, such as beads. A novel selection scheme
was developed whereby selection is performed on magnetic beads that are placed
on nitrocellulose filters, and washed as the bead is the selection target
itself. This method allows for much greater specificity of selection, thereby
promoting `winning` molecules to amplify in greater number, and thus reduce the
overall amount of rounds necessary to complete the selection procedure. Manual
selection does not involve a combination of surfaces to enhance selection. An
alternative method is to take the magnetic beads, or nucleic acids attached to
beads using methods other than beads, and running buffer over the beads and
through a filter. It has been found that a complete filter washing step provides
improved performance in the selection due to decreased background. One example
of the automation of such a methods would be to remove, e.g., nucleic acids
attached to the beads by placing the beads in a 96-well plate with a filtered
bottom, the beads washed with buffer followed by subsequent elution of the
target nucleic acids.
[0092] Cross-contamination avoidance. The introduction of contaminating species
of nucleic acid strands in a manual selection may be commonplace. This is
especially true if selection is done against multiple targets in parallel, and
also when a researcher reuses the same pool for different selection tools.
Contaminating species have been shown in the past to interfere with a manual
selection such that it could not be completed. Automated in vitro selection
takes steps to minimizing and/or eliminate the possibility of
cross-contamination between pools and targets. Movement of the mechanical pod
along the work surface is unidirectional when carrying potentially contaminating
material. This movement away from `clean` things and only towards items that
have already been exposed to replicons greatly diminishes the possibility of
cross-contaminating reactions. The only circumstance in which the pod reverses
its direction is to acquire a new, clean pipette tip. Additionally, the reagent
trays were sealed with aluminum foil for a physical barrier between the
environment and unexposed reagents. See FIG. 14, a layout of the robotic work
surface that reduces cross-contamination.
[0093] Using this method the present inventors have successfully selected
aptamers against a number of protein targets, including Cyt18, lysozyme, the
signaling kinase MEK1, Rho from a thermophilic bacteria, and the Herpes virus
US11 protein. The robot can perform 6 rounds of selection/day versus individual
protein targets, and selections are typically completed within 12-18 rounds. In
each instance, selected populations showed a substantially greater affinity for
their cognate proteins than naive populations. In addition, when selected
populations were sequenced one or more sequence families typically predominated.
Sequence families are a hallmark of a successful selection, and indicate that
the robotic method faithfully recapitulates manual selection methods.
[0094] The use of beads for target immobilization allows automated selection to
be generalized to virtually any target class. For example, small organic
molecules could be directly conjugated to beads. Similarly, antibodies could be
conjugated to beads and in turn could be used to capture macromolecular
structures, such as viruses or cells.
[0095] In another embodiment, the robotic workstation can be used for the
selection of nucleic acid catalysts. For example, a DNA library was incubated
that contained an iodine leaving group at its 5' end with a DNA oligonucleotide
substrate containing a 3' phosphorothioate nucleophile and a 5' biotin. The
biotin can be captured on beads bearing streptavidin, and the beads can in turn
be captured either by magnetic separation or by filtration. Any molecules in the
DNA pool that ligate themselves to the biotinylated substrate are co-immobilized
with that substrate. Immobilized species can be directly amplified following
transfer to the integrated thermal cycler. The inclusion of a biotin on one of
the primers used for amplification allows single-stranded DNA to be prepared by
denaturation of the non-biotinylated strand in base, followed by neutralization
of the solution. While this method has proved successful for the selection of
deoxyribozyme ligases, variations could also have been attempted. For example,
the biotinylated DNA oligonucleotide substrate could have been pre-immobilized
on beads, and the DNA pool incubated with the beads. In this instance, any
molecules in the DNA pool that ligate themselves to the substrate will also be
directly captured on the beads.
[0096] The use of beads for catalyst immobilization immediately suggests other
selection protocols. For example, nucleic acid cleavases could be selected by
first immobilizing a pool on the beads, then selecting for those species that
cleave themselves away from the beads. Similarly, nucleic acid Diels-Alder
synthetases may be selected by first immobilizing a diene on the beads, creating
a nucleic acid pool that terminates in a dienophile, and selecting for those
species that most efficiently conjugate the diene and dienophile.
[0097] This method can be applied to the selection of RCANAs. The ability to use
a robotic workstation to select for ligases demonstrates that it is possible to
select for regulatable ribozymes. For example, the selection protocols described
in this invention can be altered so that ligases that immobilized themselves in
the absence of a protein effector are removed from the random sequence
population, while ligases that subsequently immobilized themselves once a
protein effector were added are transferred to the integrated thermal cycler,
amplified, and used for additional rounds of selection. This automated selection
methods for regulatable ribozymes can readily be extended to other classes or
catalysts than ligases, such as cleavases or Diels Alder synthetases by those
skilled in the art.
[0098] Automating selection greatly diminishes human error in the actual
pipetting and biological manipulations. While programming the robot is often not
a trivial task, and can be time-consuming, automated selection is far faster and
more efficient than manual selection. The scientist's time is thus put to better
use preparing samples and analyzing data, rather than performing the actual
selection. Additionally, automated selection may include real-time monitoring
methods (e.g., molecular beacons, TaqMan) and software that can make intelligent
decisions based on real-time monitoring.
[0099] E. Chip-based RCANA for in vitro detection applications
[0100] Regulatable catalytically active nucleic acids are especially useful for
biosensor applications. For example, different protein-regulated catalytically
active nucleic acids may be anchored to a surface, such as wells in a multi-well
plate. Mixtures of analytes and fluorescently tagged substrates are added to
each well. Where cognate effectors are present, the protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids will covalently attach the fluorescent tags
to themselves. Where protein-regulated catalytically active nucleic acids have
not been activated by effectors, the tagged substrates will be washed out of the
well. After reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of co-immobilized
fluorescent tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were present during
the reaction.
[0101] In one embodiment of the invention, the reporter may be a fluorescent
tag, but it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic particle, or any number of
detectable particles. Additionally, the protein-regulated catalytically active
nucleic acids may be attached to beads or non-covalently linked to a surface
rather than covalently linked to a surface.
[0102] One advantage of this method is that covalent immobilization of reporters
(as opposed to non-covalent immobilization, as in ELISA assays) allows stringent
wash steps to be employed. Additionally, ribozyme ligases have the unique
property of being able to transduce effectors into nucleic acid templates that
can be amplified, affording an additional boost in signal prior to detection.
[0103] Another advantage is that the analytical methods of the present invention
do not rely on binding per se, but only on transient interactions. The present
invention requires mere recognition rather than a binding event that must be
physically isolated, providing a potential advantage of protein-regulated
catalytically active nucleic acids over antibodies. That is, even low affinities
are sufficient for activation and subsequent detection, especially if
individual, immobilized protein-regulated catalytically active nucleic acids are
examined (i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
[0104] FIG. 16 schematically depicts one way to anchor aptazymes to a chip for a
particular embodiment of the present invention. In this schematic, different
ribozyme ligases (indicated by different colored allosteric sites) are shown
immobilized on beads in wells, and mixtures of analytes (differentiated by shape
and color) and fluorescently tagged substrates have been added to each well. In
the middle panel of this figure, where cognate effectors are present (same color
analyte and allosteric site), the aptazymes will covalently attach the
fluorescent tags to themselves. Where RCANA have not been activated by
effectors, the tagged substrates are washed out of the well. In the last panel
of FIG. 16, after reaction and washing, the presence and amounts of
co-immobilized fluorescent tags are indicative of amounts of ligands that were
present during the reaction.
[0105] In the embodiment of FIG. 16, the reporter may be a fluorescent tag, but
it may also be an enzyme, a magnetic particle, or any number of detectible
particles. Additionally, the RCANA could be immobilized on beads, but they could
also be directly attached to a solid support via covalent bonds.
[0106] One advantage of this embodiment is that covalent immobilization of
reporters allows stringent wash steps to be employed. This can be distinguished
from to non covalent immobilization assays such as ELISA assays where stringent
washing may destroy the signal. An additional advantage is that ribozyme ligases
have the unique property of being able to transduce effectors into templates
that can be amplified, affording an additional boost the in signal prior to
detection.
[0107] Additionally, the method of the present invention contemplates that the
RCANA construct may be amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Finally, the
method contemplates that the RCANA oligonucleotide sequence of the construct may
include RNA nucleotides, so that the method further includes reverse
transcription of the RNA using reverse transcriptase to produce a DNA
complementary to the RNA template.
[0108] Modified nucleotides may be introduced into the RCANA that substantially
stabilize them from degradation in environments such as sera or urine. The
analytical methods of the present invention do not rely on binding per se, but
only on transient interactions. The present invention requires mere recognition
rather that actual binding, thus providing a potential advantage of RCANA over
antibodies. That is, even low affinities are sufficient for activation and
subsequent detection, especially if individual immobilized RCANA are examined
(i.e., by ligand-dependent immobilization of a quantum dot).
[0109] F. In Vitro Engineering and Selection of RCANAs for In Vivo Applications
[0110] The above discussion has disclosed methods for the in vitro creation of
RCANAs, and has disclosed some of their in vitro applications. In the following
section we describe the design, engineering, and in vitro selection of RCANAs
for in vivo applications.
[0111] This invention utilizes ribozymes that can alter the level of mRNAs in a
cellular system. In one embodiment, the ribozyme can be a self splicing intron,
such as the group I intron. This ribozyme can be inserted into a gene. If the
ribozyme is active, it will catalyze the a self-splicing reaction that removes
itself from the gene, allowing accurate expression of the gene. In another
embodiment, the ribozyme may be one that acts in trans to cleave a mRNA. Again,
changing the activity of the ribozyme will lead to a change in the level of the
mRNA in the cell, thereby altering the level of the protein coded by that gene.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that other ribozyme activities may be
used. For the purpose of illustration, the invention is now described in detail
with the use of the self splicing intron.
[0112] The intron is first modified to function as an RCANA. Briefly, the
methods described above can be used generate RCANA introns. A pool of potential
RCANA introns is created by randomizing one or more regions of the intron. The
randomized region optionally includes one or more residues from the catalytic
core. A selection protocol is then developed that allows the active RCANA
introns to be partitioned from the inactive ones. For example, the active RCANA
introns can be partitioned from the inactive RCANA intron based on the mobility
in gel electrophoresis. Other methods will be clear to those skilled in the art.
Based on this partitioning method, an iterative procedure of partitioning and
subsequent amplification of the RCANA introns is used to select RCANAs that are
regulated by an effector. With the exception of the partitioning method, this
procedure is essentially identical to the selection described about for RCANA
ligases.
[0113] As an alternative to the selection of RCANA introns, it is also possible
to engineer RCANA introns. For example, one of the stem-loop structures of the
intron can be replaced by an aptamer for the desired effector. Interaction of
the effector with this engineered RCANA intron-will result in a modulation of
the RCANA intron activity. Because an aptamer is different from an regulatory
element (as was detailed above), the present method will, in general, lead to
RCANAs that are regulated by the effector. However, as will be shown in an
example below, an important aspect of the current invention is that this level
of regulation can be adequate for in vivo applications.
[0114] G. In Vivo Selection and Optimization of RCANAs.
[0115] Here we disclose methods to generate RCANAs by using in vivo selection.
FIG. 4b shows a selection protocol for the Group I P6 RCANA Pool of FIG. 4a.
Positive and negative selections are made in vitro to select Group I RCANA that
are dependent on activator. The selections are described above in Example 2 for
a specific embodiment of the present invention--a theophylline dependent RCANA.
In vivo screens and selections are used to select Group I RCANA that exhibit
strong theophylline-dependence. The selected RCANA are mixed at various ratios
with mutant Group I ribozymes that splice at a low but continuous level to
determine the level at which RCANA can be selected against background. Because
activation domains are often in the form of a stem-loop, the mutations can be
concentrated in a single stem loop structure of the RCANA intron. In an
alternate embodiment, the mutations can include catalytic residues. In yet
another embodiment, the mutations are randomly dispersed in the intron. Finally,
the best theophylline-dependent Group I aptazymes that have been derived by any
of the methods described herein may undergo further selection by partially
randomizing their sequences and selecting for improved in vivo performance.
[0116] Strategies similar to those depicted in FIGS. 4a and 4b may be used to
develop RCANA on any desired effector. Positive and negative in vitro selection
such as depicted in FIG. 4b are described above in Example 2 for a specific
embodiment of the present invention.
[0117] From 10.sup.6 to 10.sup.10 variants can be efficiently transformed as
described herein, sufficient to encompass most variants in the populations
discussed so far. This efficiency of transformation, however, is likely to be
insufficient to encompass a significant fraction of a completely random pool.
Nonetheless, sequences have been selected from completely random expressed pools
that can protect bacteria from bacteriophage infection.
[0118] The above procedure described how to select in vivo RCANAs. A similar
procedure can be used to optimize engineered RCANAs. Residues in the RCANA that
might include the ligand binding region, structural stem-loops, or even
catalytic residues can be mutated. The selection procedure described above is
then used to select for optimized RCANAs.
[0119] Finally, since the rules that govern Group I intron splicing in different
gene contexts are well known to those skilled in the art, the skilled artisan
can remove RCANA introns from one context and modularly insert them into other
genes. Should the efficiency or effector-dependence of intron splicing be
compromised in the new gene, the intron may be reaccommodated to its new genetic
environment by a selectable marker to the interrupted gene of interest and
selecting for an effector-dependent phenotype.
[0120] To the extent that Group I aptazymes are self-sufficient, they should
also function in eukaryotic cells, including human cells. Selecting for
effector-dependence may also be performed in eukaryotic cells. Selection in
eukaryotic systems may be performed, e.g., by fusing the gene of interest to a
reporter gene such as GFP or luciferase. Variants of the RCANA that promote
effector-dependent protein production may then be selected using a FACS. A pool
of 10.sup.6 to 10.sup.10 variants may be screened by this procedure, a range
comparable to the bacterial system previously described.
[0121] H. In Vivo Detection Applications
[0122] Using the present invention, it is possible to activate or repress a
reporter gene (e.g., luciferase or GFP) containing an engineered intron in
response to an endogenous protein activator, or a post-translationally modified
form of an endogenous protein activator (e.g., protein kinases such as ERK 1 and
phosphorylated ERK 1). It is also possible to activate or repress a reporter
gene (e.g., luciferase or GFP) containing an engineered intron in response to
small molecule effectors (e.g., cyclic AMP, glucose, bioactive peptides,
bioactive nucleic acids, or low molecular weight drugs such as antibiotics,
antineoplastics or the like.). Thus, reporter gene-engineered intron constructs
may be used to monitor intracellular levels of proteins, post-translationally
modified forms of proteins or small molecules such as cyclic AMP and the like.
Such applications may be used for high-throughput cell-based assays and screens
for drug leads or for drug optimization and development.
[0123] Bacterial strains such as E. coli, and B. subtilis, or yeast strains such
as S. cerevisiae, and S. pombe may be transformed with an expression vector
encoding a reporter gene regulated by an intron RCANA, and these engineered
microbial cell lines may be used for cell-based assays and tests for drug
discovery and development. Similarly, standard mammalian cell lines such as CHO,
NIH3T3, 293, and 293T may be transfected with appropriate vectors (e.g., pcDNA,
pCMV, or retrovirus), that are engineered to contain RCANA-regulatable reporter
genes, and these re-engineered cell lines may be used subsequently for
cell-based assays and tests. In another use of the RCANA reporter gene
technology, tumorigenic cell lines such as LNCaP, MCF-7, MDA-MB-435, SK-Mel,
DL1, PC3, T47D and the like, may be transfected in vitro with appropriate
vectors encoding an RCANA-regulatable reporter gene. These re-engineered
tumorigenic cell lines may be used in cell-based screens for the discovery and
development anti-neoplastic drugs.
[0124] In another in vivo application, reporter gene--intron RCANA constructs
(e.g., luciferase or GFP) may be used to generate live animal models for use in
drug development. In one embodiment the RCANA-intron construct may be used in an
engineered tumorigenic cell line to indicate the levels of a target molecule
used to generate a tumor xenograft in nude mice. Mice bearing the tumors derived
from the engineered cell line may then be used to screen for drugs that alter
the level of the target molecule. For example, a transfected MDA-MB-435 line
engineered to express a GFP gene under regulatable control by intron response to
the protein activator phospho-ERK 1 is used to screen for drugs which both
inhibit tumor growth and block formation of phospho-ERK. In another embodiment
of the RCANA intron invention, transgenic mouse models may be generated in which
tissue or cell type specific expression of the reporter gene is controlled by
the effector activated RCANA intron. For example transgenic mice expressing a
phospho-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) specific RCANA regulated GFP gene
under control of the MMTV (mouse mammary tumor virus) promoter would show
expression of GFP in mouse mammary tissue in a phospho-VEGF RTK dependent
manner. Furthermore, these mice may be used to screen compounds for anti-VEGF
RTK activity.
[0125] FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of the
present invention. Exogenous or endogenous activation of Group I intron splicing
is depicted. A reporter gene such as Luciferase or beta-Gal is fused to the gene
of interest which also contains the group I intron (td). Splicing-out of the
Group I intron is induced by an effector, shown in the diagram as a protein, in
this case Cyt18, by the shaded oval. Activation of the RCANA and auto-excision
of the intron results in expression of the reporter gene to detect the desired
reaction. The use of a reporter gene of this embodiment may be suitable for use
in eukaryotic systems.
[0126] FIG. 6 is a diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.
Libraries of candidate exogenous activators (E.sub.1-n) may be generated from a
randomized RCANA pool indicated by the triangle. As in the embodiment of FIG. 5,
a reporter gene is expressed in cells where the exogenous activator activates
the RCANA to release the intron from the gene. As will be known to those of
skill in the art any number of current and future libraries may be used with the
present invention.
[0127] FIG. 7 depicts an alternative embodiment for screening libraries of
exogenous activators. In the embodiment of the present invention of FIG. 7,
Group I introns are induced into trans-splicing. Extracted and amplified introns
are used to transform cells.
[0128] FIG. 8 shows yet another alternative embodiment for screening libraries
of exogenous activators of the present invention. In the embodiment of FIG. 8,
the effector (shaded oval), shown in this illustration as protein Cyt18, is
mutagenized (triangle) to form an effector library. A second effector
(E.sub.1-n) interacts with and activates one or more members of the effector
library. The effector-effector complex is exposed to the gene containing both
the Group I intron and a reporter gene. Cell sorting reveals the cells that
express the reporter gene to indicate successful activation of the RCANA by the
effector-effector complex.
[0129] FIG. 9 is a diagram of an embodiment of the present invention for
screening for endogenous activators. In this embodiment, an endogenous effector,
in this illustration shown as a protein activator from endogenous or transformed
origin (shaded oval), activates self-splicing of the Group I intron. Cell
sorting is used to reveal the expression of the reporter gene. To protect
against spontaneous auto-excision of the intron, the gene may be transferred
into a different background system such as yeast or E. coli, for example.
[0130] FIG. 10 depicts an alternative to the embodiment of FIG. 9 to screen for
endogenous activators of the present invention. In FIG. 10, the activator that
is being screened for may include, inter alia, a phosphorylated protein, a
product of ubiquitination, or a protein-protein complex. For example, a protein
activator, shown as the small shaded oval, may phosphorylate an effector such as
Cyt18, shown as a large shaded oval with the phosphorylation indicated by the
shaded rectangle. The phosphorylated effector activates intron self-splicing
with concomitant expression of the reporter gene, shown here for illustration as
Luciferase or beta-Galactosidase.
[0131] FIG. 11 shows yet another embodiment of the present invention to monitor
compounds that perturb cellular metabolism. In this embodiment, a ribozyme
similar to described in FIG. 6, and designated in this diagram by a line with a
triangle is activated by a protein effector, shown as a shaded oval in FIG. 11.
The protein effector may be a phosphoprotein, an induced protein, or a protein
complex, for example. One or more second effectors, designated as a series of
circles, alters the level of or degree of modification of the protein effector.
The source of the second effectors may be endogenous or the effectors may be the
product of a transformation construct used to transform a cell. Alteration of
the level or modification of the protein effector results in an alteration in
the expression of the reporter gene (shown as a dark circle with "lightning
bolts"). The functioning of the gene of interest may thereby be perturbed,
providing information about the function and/or regulation of the gene or gene
product. FIG. 11 describes a method for taking the products of the screen
described in FIGS. 8 and 10 and using them to monitor cellular or metabolic
states.
[0132] FIG. 12 shows a further embodiment of the present invention that provides
a non-invasive readout of metabolic states. An RCANA construct of the present
invention may be introduced to a gene of interest. A protein suppressor from
either an endogenous source from the product of cell transformation activates
self-splicing of the RCANA, leading to expression of the endogenous gene, shown
here again as a dark circle with lightning bolts. Whether or not the gene of
interest is expressed upon release of the RCANA intron from the gene provides
information about the metabolic state of the gene of interest. The embodiment of
the present invention of FIG. 12 thus provides a non-invasive means to determine
the metabolic state of an organism with regard to a gene of interest.
[0133] FIG. 13 depicts a further embodiment of the present invention wherein
endogenous suppressors provide a non-invasive readout of multiple metabolic
states. Multiple protein activators (endogenous or transformed) are exposed to a
pool of Group I introns of the present invention. The pool comprises introns
with length polymorphisms that are depicted in FIG. 13 by a discontinuity or
break in the line representing the Group I intron (thick line) residing in a
gene of interest (thin line). Activation of the RCANA leads to trans-splicing
among the various polymorphisms. The products of trans-splicing may be extracted
and amplified. Separation of the trans-splicing products by gel electrophoresis
provides a read out of the protein function or the metabolic pathway. The
readout may even be digitized for analysis.
[0134] I. In Vivo Uses of RCANAs for Gene Therapy
[0135] One important feature of using RCANAs and the method of the present
invention for gene therapies is that regulated introns may be used to control
gene expression, for any of a variety of genes, since the introns may be
inserted into and be engineered to accommodate virtually any gene. Moreover,
since the RCANAs may be engineered to respond to any of a variety of effectors,
the characteristics of the effector (oral availability, synthetic accessibility,
pharmacokinetic properties) may be chosen in advance. The drug is chosen prior
to engineering the target of the drug. In part because of these extraordinary
capabilities, RCANA provide perhaps the only viable route to medically
successful and practical gene therapies. Drugs may be given throughout the
treatment (or lifetime) of a patient who had undergone a single initial gene
therapy. In addition, by making the gene therapy regulatable, the amount of a
gene product may be easily increased or decreased in different individuals at
different times during the treatment by increasing or decreasing the doses of
effectors.
[0136] The present method also includes transforming a cell with the RCANA
construct so that the construct is inserted into a gene of interest. An effector
is provided to activate the RCANA so that administering to the cell an effective
amount of the effector induces the RCANA to splice itself out of the gene to
regulate expression of the gene.
[0137] The method of the present invention contemplates that the RCANA construct
may be a plasmid. The method then further includes transforming the cell with
the plasmid. The method of the present invention also contemplates ligating the
RCANA construct into a vector and transforming the cell with the vector.
[0138] Definitions
[0139] As used herein, the term "regulatable, catalytically active nucleic acid"
or "RCANA" means a ribozyme or nucleic acid enzyme that is regulated by an
effector. The kinetic parameters of the RCANA may be varied in response to the
amount of an effector, which may be an allosteric effector molecule. Just as
allosteric protein enzymes undergo a change in their kinetic parameters or of
their enzymatic activity in response to interactions with an effector molecule,
the catalytic abilities of RCANAs may be similarly modulated by effectors. As
demonstrated herein, the effectors may be small molecules, proteins, peptides or
molecules that interact with proteins, peptides or other molecules. RCANAs
transduce molecular recognition into catalysis upon interaction with an effector
that interacts with a portion of the RCANA.
[0140] As used herein, the term "effector," "effector molecule", "allosteric
effector" or "allosteric effector molecule" means a molecule or process that
changes the kinetic parameters or catalytic activity of an RCANA.
[0141] As used herein, the term "catalytic residue" refers to residues that when
mutated decrease the activity of the RCANA. Mutating a residue that affects the
catalytic activity of a ribozyme following the selection of the RCANA, may cause
different residues to become sensitive to mutation than in the original
ribozyme. The relative mutational sensitivity of a given `catalytic residue` may
change before and after the selection of the RCANA. These secondary mutations
are also encompassed by the present invention.
[0142] As used herein, the term "aptamer" refers to a nucleic acid that has been
specifically selected to optimally bind to a target ligand. As described above,
it is important to recognize that an aptamer is fundamentally different than an
RCANA.
[0143] As used herein, the term "kinetic parameters" refers to any aspect of the
catalytic activity of the nucleic acid. Changes in the kinetic parameters of a
catalytic RCANA produce changes in the catalytic activity of the RCANA such as a
change in the rate of reaction or a change in substrate specificity. For
example, self-splicing of an RCANA out of a gene environment may result from a
change in the kinetic parameters of the RCANA.
[0144] As used herein, the term "catalytic" or "catalytic activity" refers to
the ability of a substance to affect a change in itself or of a substrate under
permissive conditions. As used herein, the term "protein-protein complex" or
"protein complex" refers to an association of more than one protein. The
proteins that make up a protein complex may be associated by functional,
stereochemical, conformational, biochemical, or electrostatic mechanisms. It is
intended that the term encompass associations of any number of proteins.
[0145] As used herein, the term "in vivo" refers to cellular systems and
organisms, e.g., cultured cells, yeast, bacteria, plants and/or animals.
[0146] As used herein the terms "protein", "polypeptide" or "peptide" refer to
compounds comprising amino acids joined via peptide bonds and are used
interchangeably.
[0147] As used herein, the term "endogenous" refers to a substance the source of
which is from within a cell, cell extract or reaction system. Endogenous
substances are produced by the metabolic activity of, e.g., a cell. Endogenous
substances, however, may nevertheless be produced as a result of manipulation of
cellular metabolism to, for example, make the cell express the gene encoding the
substance.
[0148] As used herein, the term "exogenous" refers to a substance the source of
which is external to a cell, cell extract or reaction system. An exogenous
substance may nevertheless be internalized by a cell by any one of a variety of
metabolic or induced means known to those skilled in the art.
[0149] As used herein the term "modified base" refers to a non-natural
nucleotide of any sort, in which a chemical modification may be found on the
nucleobase, the sugar, or the polynucleotide backbone or phosphodiester linkage.
[0150] As used herein, the term "gene" means the coding region of a
deoxyribonucleotide sequence encoding the amino acid sequence of a protein. The
term includes sequences located adjacent to the coding region on both the 5, and
3, ends such that the deoxyribonucleotide sequence corresponds to the length of
the full-length mRNA for the protein. The term "gene" encompasses both cDNA and
genomic forms of a gene. A genomic form or clone of a gene contains the coding
region interrupted with non-coding sequences termed "introns" or "intervening
regions" or "intervening sequences." Introns are segments of a gene that are
transcribed into nuclear RNA (hnRNA); introns may contain regulatory elements
such as enhancers. Introns are removed, excised or "spliced out" from the
nuclear or primary transcript; introns therefore are absent in the messenger RNA
(mRNA) transcript. The mRNA functions during translation to specify the sequence
or order of amino acids in a nascent polypeptide.
[0151] In addition to containing introns, genomic forms of a gene may also
include sequences located on both the 5' and 3' end of the sequences that are
present on the RNA transcript. These sequences are referred to as "flanking"
sequences or regions (these flanking sequences are located 5' or 3' to the
non-translated sequences present on the mRNA transcript). The 5' flanking region
may contain regulatory sequences such as promoters and enhancers that control or
influence the transcription of the gene. The 3' flanking region may contain
sequences that direct the termination of transcription, post-transcriptional
cleavage and polyadenylation.
[0152] DNA molecules are said to have "5'ends" and "3'ends" because
mononucleotides are reacted to make oligonucleotides in a manner such that the
5' phosphate of one mononucleotide pentose ring is attached to the 3' oxygen of
its neighbor in one direction via a phosphodiester linkage. Therefore, an end of
an oligonucleotides referred to as the "5'end" if its 5' phosphate is not linked
to the 3' oxygen of a mononucleotide pentose ring and as the "3'end" if its 3'
oxygen is not linked to a 5' phosphate of a subsequent mononucleotide pentose
ring. As used herein, a nucleic acid sequence, even if internal to a larger
oligonucleotide, also may be said to have 5' and 3' ends. In either a linear or
circular DNA molecule, discrete elements are referred to as being "upstream" or
5' of the "downstream" or 3' elements. This terminology reflects the fact that
transcription proceeds in a 5' to 3' fashion along the DNA strand.
[0153] The term "gene of interest" as used here refers to a gene, the function
and/or expression of which is desired to be investigated, or the expression of
which is desired to be regulated, by the present invention. In the present
disclosure, the td gene of the T4 bacteriophage is an example of a gene of
interest and is described herein to illustrate the invention. The present
invention may be useful in regard to any gene of any organism, whether of a
prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism.
[0154] The term "hybridize" as used herein, refers to any process by which a
strand of nucleic acid binds with a complementary strand through base pairing.
Hybridization and the strength of hybridization (i.e., the strength of the
association between the nucleic acid strands) is impacted by such factors as the
degree of complementary between the nucleic acids, stringency of the conditions
involved, the melting temperature of the formed hybrid, and the G:C (or U:C for
RNA) ratio within the nucleic acids.
[0155] The terms "complementary" or "complementarity" as used herein, refer to
the natural binding of polynucleotides under permissive salt and temperature
conditions by base-pairing. For example, for the sequence "A-G-T" binds to the
complementary sequence "T-C-A". Complementarity between two single-stranded
molecules may be partial, in which only some of the nucleic acids bind, or it
may be complete when total complementarity exists between the single stranded
molecules. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands has
significant effects on the efficiency and strength of hybridization between
nucleic acid strands. This is of particular importance in amplification
reactions, which depend upon binding between nucleic acids strands.
[0156] The term "homology," as used herein, refers to a degree of
complementarity. There may be partial homology or complete homology (i.e.,
identity). A partially complementary sequence is one that at least partially
inhibits an identical sequence from hybridizing to a target nucleic acid; it is
referred to using the functional term "substantially homologous." The inhibition
of hybridization of the completely complementary sequence to the target sequence
may be examined using a hybridization assay (Southern or Northern blot, solution
hybridization and the like) under conditions of low stringency. A substantially
homologous sequence or probe will compete for and inhibit the binding (i.e., the
hybridization) of a completely homologous sequence or probe to the target
sequence under conditions of low stringency. This is not to say that conditions
of low stringency are such that non-specific binding is permitted; low
stringency conditions require that the binding of two sequences to one another
be a specific (i.e., selective) interaction. The absence of non-specific binding
may be tested by the use of a second target sequence which lacks even a partial
degree of complementarity (e.g., less than about 30% identity); in the absence
of non-specific binding, the probe will not hybridize to the second
non-complementary target sequence. When used in reference to a single-stranded
nucleic acid sequence, the term "substantially homologous" refers to any probe
which can hybridize (i.e., it is the complement of) the single-stranded nucleic
acid sequence under conditions of low stringency as described.
[0157] As known in the art, numerous equivalent conditions may be employed to
comprise either low or high stringency conditions. Factors such as the length
and nature (DNA, RNA, base composition) of the sequence, nature of the target
(DNA, RNA, base composition, presence in solution or immobilization, etc.), and
the concentration of the salts and other components (e.g., the presence or
absence of formamide, dextran sulfate and/or polyethylene glycol) are considered
and the hybridization solution may be varied to generate conditions of either
low or high stringency different from, but equivalent to, the above listed
conditions.
[0158] As used herein the term "stringency" is used in reference to the
conditions of temperature, ionic strength, and the presence of other compounds
such as organic solvents, under which nucleic acid selections are conducted.
With "high stringency" conditions a relatively small number of nucleic acid
catalysts will be selected from a random sequence pool, while under "low
stringency conditions a larger number of nucleic acid catalysts will be selected
from a random sequence pool.
[0159] Numerous equivalent conditions may be employed to comprise low or high
stringency conditions; factors such as the length of incubation of the reaction,
the presence of competitive inhibitors of the reaction, the buffer conditions
under which the reaction is carried out, the temperature at which the reaction
is carried out are considered and the hybridization solution may be varied to
generate conditions of low stringency selection different from, but equivalent
to, the above listed conditions.
[0160] The term "antisense," as used herein, refers to nucleotide sequences that
are complementary to a specific DNA or RNA sequence. The term "antisense strand"
is used in reference to a nucleic acid strand that is complementary to tile
"sense" strand. Antisense molecules may be produced by any method, including
synthesis by ligating the gene(s) of interest in a reverse orientation to a
viral promoter that permits the synthesis of a complementary strand. Once
introduced into a cell, the transcribed strand combines with natural sequences
produced by the cell to form duplexes. These duplexes then block either the
further transcription or translation. In this manner, mutant phenotypes may also
be generated. The designation "negative" is sometimes used in reference to the
antisense strand, and "positive" is sometimes used in reference to the sense
strand. The term is also used in reference to RNA sequences that are
complementary to a specific RNA sequence (e.g., mRNA). Included within this
definition are antisense RNA ("asRNA") molecules involved in genetic regulation
by bacteria.
[0161] Antisense RNA may be produced by any method, including synthesis by
splicing the gene(s) of interest in a reverse orientation to a viral promoter
that permits the synthesis of a coding strand. Once introduced into an embryo,
this transcribed strand combines with natural mRNA produced by the embryo to
form duplexes. These duplexes then block either the further transcription of the
mRNA or its translation. In this manner, mutant phenotypes may be generated. The
term "antisense strand" is used in reference to a nucleic acid strand that is
complementary to the "sense" strand. The designation. (-) (i.e., "negative") is
sometimes used in reference to the antisense strand with the designation (+)
sometimes used in reference to the sense (i.e., "positive") strand.
[0162] A gene may produce multiple RNA species that are generated by
differential splicing of the primary RNA transcript. cDNAs that are splice
variants of the same gene will contain regions of sequence identity or complete
homology (representing the presence of the same exon or portion of the same exon
on both cDNAs) and regions of complete non-identity (for example, representing
the presence of exon "A" on cDNA 1 wherein cDNA 2 contains exon "B" instead).
Because the two cDNAs contain regions of sequence identity they will both
hybridize to a probe derived from the entire gene or portions of the gene
containing sequences found on both cDNAs; the two splice variants are therefore
substantially homologous to such a probe and to each other.
[0163] "Transformation," as defined herein, describes a process by which
exogenous DNA enters and changes a recipient cell. It may occur under natural or
artificial conditions using various methods well known in the art.
Transformation may rely on any known method for the insertion of foreign nucleic
acid sequences into a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell. The method is
selected based on the host cell being transformed and may include, but is not
limited to, viral infection, electroporation, lipofection, and particle
bombardment. Such "transformed" cells include stably transformed cells in which
the inserted DNA is capable of replication either as an autonomously replicating
plasmid or as part of the host chromosome. The term "transfection" as used
herein refers to the introduction of foreign DNA into eukaryotic cells.
[0164] Transfection may be accomplished by a variety of methods known to the art
including, e.g., calcium phosphate-DNA co-precipitation, DEAE-dextran-mediated
transfection, polybrene-mediated transfection, electroporation, microinjection,
liposome fusion, lipofection, protoplast fusion, retroviral infection, and
biolistics. Thus, the term "stable transfection" or "stably transfected" refers
to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the
transfected cell. The term "stable transfectant" refers to a cell that has
stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA. The term also encompasses
cells that transiently express the inserted DNA or RNA for limited periods of
time. Thus, the term "transient transfection" or "transiently transfected"
refers to the introduction of foreign DNA into a cell where the foreign DNA
fails to integrate into the genome of the transfected cell. The foreign DNA
persists in the nucleus of the transfected cell for several days. During this
time the foreign DNA is subject to the regulatory controls that govern the
expression of endogenous genes in the chromosomes. The term "transient
transfectant" refers to cells that have taken up foreign DNA but have failed to
integrate this DNA.
[0165] As used herein, the term "selectable marker" refers to the use of a gene
that encodes an enzymatic activity and which confers the ability to grow in
medium lacking what would otherwise be an essential nutrient (e.g., the HIS3
gene in yeast cells); in addition, a selectable marker may confer resistance to
an antibiotic or drug upon the cell in which the selectable marker is expressed.
A review of the use of selectable markers in mammalian cell lines is provided in
Sambrook, J. et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (1989) pp.16.9-16.15.
[0166] As used herein, the term "reporter gene" refers to a gene that is
expressed in a cell upon satisfaction of one or more contingencies and which,
upon expression, confers a detectable phenotype to the cell to indicate that the
contingencies for expression have been satisfied. For example, the gene for
Luciferase confers a luminescent phenotype to a cell when the gene is expressed
inside the cell. In the present invention, the gene for Luciferase may be used
as a reporter gene such that the gene is only expressed upon the splicing out of
an intron in response to an effector. Those cells in which the effector
activates splicing of the intron will express Luciferase and will glow.
[0167] As used herein, the term "vector" is used in reference to nucleic acid
molecules that transfer DNA segment(s) from one cell to another. The term
"vehicle" is sometimes used interchangeably with "vector." The term "vector" as
used herein also includes expression vectors in reference to a recombinant DNA
molecule containing a desired coding sequence and appropriate nucleic acid
sequences necessary for the expression of the operably linked coding sequence in
a particular host organism. Nucleic acid sequences necessary for expression in
prokaryotes usually include a promoter, an operator (optional), and a ribosome
binding site, often along with other sequences. Eukaryotic cells are known to
utilize promoters, enhancers, and termination and polyadenylation signals.
[0168] As used herein, the term "amplify", when used in reference to nucleic
acids refers to the production of a large number of copies of a nucleic acid
sequence by any method known in the art. Amplification is a special case of
nucleic acid replication involving template specificity. Template specificity is
frequently described in terms of "target" specificity. Target sequences are
"targets" in the sense that they are to be sorted out from other nucleic acid.
Amplification techniques have been designed primarily for this sorting out.
[0169] As used herein, the term "primer" refers to an oligonucleotide, whether
occurring naturally as in a purified restriction digest or produced
synthetically, which is capable of acting as a point of initiation of synthesis
when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product
which is complementary to a nucleic acid strand is induced, (i.e., in the
presence of nucleotides and an inducing agent such as DNA polymerase and at a
suitable temperature and pH). The primer may be single stranded for maximum
efficiency in amplification but may alternatively be double stranded. If double
stranded, the primer is first treated to separate its strands before being used
to prepare extension products. The primer must be sufficiently long to prime the
synthesis of extension products in the presence of the inducing agent. The exact
lengths of the primers will depend on many factors, including temperature,
source of primer and the use of the method.
[0170] As used herein, the term "probe" refers to an oligonucleotide (i.e., a
sequence of nucleotides), whether occurring naturally as in a purified
restriction digest or produced synthetically, recombinantly or by PCR
amplification, which is capable of hybridizing to another oligonucleotide of
interest. A probe may be single-stranded or double-stranded. Probes are useful
in the detection, identification and isolation of particular gene sequences. It
is contemplated that any probe used in the present invention will be labeled
with any "reporter molecule," so that is detectable in any detection system,
including, but not limited to enzyme (e.g. ELISA, as well as enzyme-based
histochemical assays), fluorescent, radioactive, and luminescent systems. It is
not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular detection
system or label.
[0171] As used herein, the term "target" when used in reference to the
polymerase chain reaction, refers to the region of nucleic acid bounded by the
primers used for polymerase chain reaction. Thus, the "target" is sought to be
sorted oat from other nucleic acid sequences. A "segment" is defined as a region
of nucleic acid within the target sequence.
[0172] As used herein, the term "polymerase chain reaction" ("PCR") refers to
the method of K. B. Mullis U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195, 4,683,202, and 4,965,188,
hereby incorporated by reference, which describe a method for increasing the
concentration of a segment of a target sequence in a mixture of genomic DNA
without cloning or purification. This process for amplifying the target sequence
consists of introducing a large excess of two oligonucleotide primers to the DNA
mixture containing the desired target sequence, followed by a precise sequence
of thermal cycling in the presence of a DNA polymerase. The two primers are
complementary to their respective strands of the double stranded target
sequence.
[0173] To effect amplification, the mixture is denatured and the primers then
annealed to their complementary sequences within the target molecule. Following
annealing, the primers are extended with a polymerase so as to form a new pair
of complementary strands. The steps of denaturation, primer annealing and
polymerase extension can be repeated many times (i.e., denaturation, annealing
and extension constitute one "cycle"; there can be numerous "cycles") to obtain
a high concentration of an amplified segment of the desired target sequence. The
length of the amplified segment of the desired target sequence is determined by
the relative positions of the primers with respect to each other, and therefore,
this length is a controllable parameter. By virtue of the repeating aspect of
the process, the method is referred to as the "polymerase chain reaction"
(hereinafter "PCR"). Because the desired amplified segments of the target
sequence become the predominant sequences (in terms of concentration) in the
mixture, they are said to be "PCR amplified".
[0174] With PCR, it is possible to amplify a single copy of a specific target
sequence in genomic DNA to a level detectable by several different methodologies
(e.g., hybridization with a labeled probe; incorporation of biotinylated primers
followed by avidin-enzyme conjugate detection; incorporation of .sup.32P-labeled
deoxynucleotide triphosphates, such as DCTP or DATP, into the amplified
segment). In addition to genomic DNA, any oligonucleotide sequence can be
amplified with the appropriate set of primer molecules. In particular the
amplified segments created by the PCR process itself are, themselves, efficient
templates for subsequent PCR amplifications.
EXAMPLE 1
GPITH1P6
[0175] Engineering of an RCANA for In Vivo Detection Applications
[0176] The first example illustrates how to make an RCANA construct and
demonstrates self-splicing of the RCANA out of a gene in response to an effector
molecule.
1 Construction of a RCANA. Oligos GpIWt3.129: 5'-TAA TCT TAC CCC GGA ATT ATA TCC
(SEQ ID NO:1) AGC TGC ATG TCA CCA TGC AGA GCA GAC TAT ATC TCC AAC TTG TTA AAG
CAA GTT GTC TAT CGT TTC GAG TCA CTT GAC CCT ACT CCC CAA AGG GAT AGT CGT TAG-3'
and GpITh1P6.131: 5'-GCC TGA GTA TAA GGT GAC TTA TAC (SEQ ID NO:2) TTG TAA TCT
ATC TAA ACG GGG AAC CTC TCT AGT AGA CAA TCC CGT GCT AAA TTA TAC CAG CAT CGT CTT
GAT GCC CTT GGC AGA TAA ATG CCT AAC GAC TAT CCC TT-3'
[0177] were annealed and extended in a 30 .mu.l reaction containing 100 pmoles
of each oligo, 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM MgCl.sub.2, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM
DTT, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 45 units of AMV reverse transcriptase (RT: Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.) at 37.degree. C. for 30 minutes. The
extension reaction was diluted 1 to 50 in H.sub.2O.
[0178] A PCR reaction containing 1 .mu.l of the extension dilution, 500 mM KCl,
100 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 9.0), 1% Triton.RTM. x-100, 15 mM MgCl.sub.2, 0.4 .mu.M of
GpIWt1.75: 5'-GAT
2 0.4 .mu.M of GplWtl. 75: 5'-GAT AAT ACG ACT CAC TAT AGG GAT (SEQ ID NO:3) CAA
CGC TCA GTA GAT GTT TTC TTG GGT TAA TTG AGG CCT GAG TAT AAG GTG-3', 0.4 .mu.M of
GpIWt4.89: 5'-CTT AGC TAC AAT ATG AAC TAA CGT (SEQ ID NO:4) AGC ATA TGA CGC AAT
ATT AAA CGG TAG CAT TAT GTT CAG ATA AGG TCG TTA ATC TTA CCC CGG AA-3',
[0179] NO:4), 0.2 mM each dNTP and 1.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega,
Madison, Wis.) was thermocycled 20 times under the following regime: 94.degree.
C. for 30 seconds, 45.degree. C. for 30 seconds, 72.degree. C. for 1 minute. The
PCR reaction was precipitated in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl and 2.5 volumes of
ethanol and then quantitated by comparison with a molecular weight standard
using agarose gel electrophoresis.
[0180] The RCANA construct was transcribed in a 10 .mu.l high yield
transcription reaction (AmpliScribe from Epicentre, Madison, Wis. The reaction
contained 500 ng PCR product, 3.3 pmoles of .sup.32P [.sup.32P]UTP, 1.times.
AmpliScribe transcription buffer, 10 mM DTT, 7.5 mM each NTP, and 1 .mu.l
AmpliScribe T7 polymerase mix. The transcription reaction was incubated at
37.degree. C. for 2 hours. One unit of RNase free-DNase was added and the
reaction returned to 37.degree. C. for 30 minutes. The transcription was then
purified on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel to separate the full length RNA
from incomplete transcripts and spliced products, eluted and quantitated
spectrophotometrically.
[0181] In vitro Assay. The RNA (4 pmoles/12 .mu.l H.sub.2O) was heated to
94.degree. C. for 1 minute then cooled to 37.degree. C. over 2 minutes in a
thermocycler. The RNA was divided into 2 splicing reactions (9 .mu.l each)
containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.45), 500 mM KCl and 15 MM MgCl.sub.2, plus or
minus theophylline (2 mM). The reactions were immediately placed on ice for 30
minutes. GTP (1 mM) was added to the reactions (final volume of 10 .mu.l) and
the reactions were incubated at 37.degree. C. for 2 hours.
[0182] The reactions were terminated by the addition of stop dye (10 .mu.l) (95%
formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.5% xylene cyanol, and 0.5% bromophenol blue). The
reactions were heated to 70.degree. C. for 3 minutes and 10 .mu.l was
electrophoresed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The gel was dried,
exposed to a phosphor screen and analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics
Phosphorimager (Sunnyvale, Calif.).
[0183] Activation was determined from the amount of circular intron in each
reaction. Circularized introns migrate slower than linear RNA and can be seen as
the bands above the dark bands of linear RNA in the +Theo lanes of the gels of
FIGS. 2a and 2b.
[0184] In vivo Screening of Group I Aptazymes. The RCANA constructs as well as
the wild type and a negative control were ligated into a vector that contains
the T4 td intron with Eco RI and Spe I flanking the P6 region, transformed and
minipreped. The plasmids were then transformed into C600:Thy A Kan.sup.R cells
(cells lacking thymidine synthetase). Individual colonies were picked and grown
in rich media overnight. Theophylline (1 .mu.l: 6.6 mM) or H.sub.2O (1 .mu.l)
was added to 2 .mu.l of the overnight growth and was spotted on either minimal
media plates, or minimal media plates with thymine, see FIG. 3.
EXAMPLE 2
GPIP6THPOOL
[0185] In Vitro Selection to Optimize an RCANA for In Vivo Detection
Applications
[0186] Example 2 illustrates how to generate a population of RCANA so that there
is variation in the nucleotide sequence of the aptamer
|