|
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2004, p . 4387-4394, Vol . 48, No . 11 In Vitro Combination of Amdoxovir and the Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors Mycophenolic Acid and Ribavirin Demonstrates Potent Activity against Wild-Type and Drug-Resistant Variants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1Katyna Borroto-Esoda,1* Florence Myrick,1 Joy Feng,1 Jerry Jeffrey,2 and Phillip Furman3 Gilead Sciences Inc., Durham,1 Glaxo SmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,2 Pharmasset Inc., Tucker, Georgia3 Received 1 December 2003/ Returned for modification 15 March 2004/ Accepted 29 June 2004
In the de novo purine synthesis pathway, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is the first of two enzymes responsible for the conversion of IMP to GMP, which is normally converted to GDP, GTP, and dGTP . Studies with various cell types, including lymphocytes, have shown that inhibiting IMPDH causes a reduction in the intercellular levels of GTP and dGTP (20, 36) . Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a prodrug which is rapidly converted to mycophenolic acid, a potent and reversible uncompetitive inhibitor of IMPDH (1) . Lymphocytes and monocytes rely primarily on the de novo pathway of guanosine synthesis, and therefore MPA selectively inhibits lymphocyte and monocyte proliferation (1, 20) . In addition, MPA inhibits HIV replication in these cells presumably through reduction of dGTP pools (8, 17) . MPA has been shown to increase the in vitro anti-HIV activity of ABC when used in combination (21) . Several pilot clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of MPA (given as the prodrug MMF) in combination with HAART (8, 9, 22) . Overall, therapy with MMF resulted in a transient decrease in HIV viral load in the majority of patients . In addition, there were no significant changes in the levels of CD4+ cells following 24 weeks of treatment . Ribavirin (RBV), a purine analogue with a broad spectrum of antiviral activity (32), has been approved for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus and, in combination with interferon, for the treatment of hepatitis C infection . RBV monophosphate, the active metabolite of the antiviral agent RBV, is a substrate mimic of IMP and as such functions as a competitive inhibitor of IMPDH (33) . RBV monophosphate has also been shown to enhance the anti-HIV activity of ddI in vitro (5, 25) . As with MPA and hydroxyurea, the synergistic effects of RBV in combination with specific NRTIs is attributed to changes in the intracellular dNTP pools (4) . Alternatively, inhibition of IMPDH also results in accumulation of IMP which would in turn facilitate the phosphorylation of ()-ß-D-dioxolane guanosine (DXG) to its 5' monophosphate form by high-Km 5' nucleotidase, a proposed key enzyme in the DXG activation pathway (10) . Amdoxovir [()-ß-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane (DAPD)] is an aqueous, soluble, and bioavailable prodrug that is rapidly absorbed and converted in vivo to DXG (12, 15) . In vitro, the anti-HIV activity observed with DAPD is almost entirely due to the generation of DXG following deamination of DAPD by the action of adenosine deaminase . DXG is subsequently phosphorylated to the 5' triphosphate, DXG-TP, a strong alternative competitive inhibitor of HIV-RT (Ki = 0.019 µM) . In this study, we investigated the effects of MPA and RBV on the in vitro antiviral activity of DAPD and DXG . We demonstrated that when DAPD or DXG is combined with MPA or RBV, a synergistic anti-HIV response occurred . Moreover, when cells infected with mutant HIV-1 resistant to DAPD or DXG were exposed to these combinations, the 50% effective concentration (EC50) for DAPD and DXG reverted to near wild-type values . These results suggest that the combination of MMF and DAPD could prove to be an effective approach to treating experienced patients who are not responding to current NRTI-containing regimens .
Cells. Cytotoxicity and activity assays were performed in the T-cell line MT2 and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) . Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 20 µg of gentamicin (Life Technologies)/ml . PBMC were obtained from HIV-seronegative donors by banding on Ficoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and were activated by phytohemagglutinin (PHAP; Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 days prior to infection . Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 20 µg of gentamicin/ml, and 10% interleukin-2 . Viruses. Recombinant viruses were created by subcloning the HIV protease and RT coding sequences obtained from patient plasma HIV RNA into a modified version of the plasmid xxLAI (31) . Amplification and cloning strategies have been previously described (23) . Recombinant viruses contained mutations in the HIV-RT at positions F116Y, Q151M, and T215Y . Viruses containing mutations at positions K65R, L74V, Q151M, and K65R/Q151M of the HIV-RT were generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the xxLAI plasmid using a QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene . Genotypic analysis of the recombinant viruses and of viruses obtained by site-directed mutagenesis was performed by dideoxy-sequencing using ABI Prism 377 technology . Antiviral assays. Anti-HIV assays were performed using two different assay methodologies . A cytotoxicity-based (XTT) assay was performed to evaluate activity in MT2 cells (26) and an HIV-1 p24-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Organon Teknika Corporation) was performed to evaluate activity in PBMC . For the XTT assay, MT2 cells were infected with either the mutant virus or wild-type LAI at a multiplicity of infection of 0.03 in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 20 µg of gentamicin/ml, and 2 µg of Polybrene (Sigma)/ml for 2 h at 37°C . Following infection, cells were seeded into 96-well plates containing test compounds at 3 x 104 cells/well . Within each 96-well plate, test compounds were tested in triplicate at fivefold serial dilutions . The infected cells were cultured for 5 days in the presence of test compounds . On day 5, XTT {2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5[(phenylammino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide} was added, and the plates were incubated for 3 h at 37°C and then analyzed for absorption (A450) . A dose-response curve for each test compound was generated using the absorption values of the uninfected cell controls as 100% protection and no drug, virus-infected cells as 0% protection . From the dose-response curve, an EC50 was calculated and defined as the concentration of drug that inhibited viral induced cytopathic effect by 50% . Anti-HIV activity was also assessed in human PBMC by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of HIV-1 p24 core antigen . PBMC were infected with HIV-1 virus at a multiplicity of infection of 0.001 for 4 h at 37°C and plated in the presence of drugs as described above . Infected cells were cultured for 4 days . On day 4, the amount of HIV-1 p24 was determined in each well . Uninfected cells were used as background and readings from the virus control were considered 100% infection . Dose-response curves and EC50s were determined as described above . The effect of MPA and RBV on the in vitro anti-HIV activity of DAPD, DXG, ABC, and AZT was evaluated using the MT2/XTT and PBMC/p24 assays described above . Combination assays were performed in triplicate with various concentrations of the test compounds, alone or with a fixed concentration of MPA or RBV . Results from the antiviral assays in PBMC were analyzed using the MacSynergy II program to determine potential synergistic and/or antagonistic activities (27, 28) . This program calculates a theoretical additive value for each drug combination based on the values generated by the drugs alone using an independent effects model (Bliss independence) . The theoretical additive values are subtracted from the experimental values generated by each drug combination to give a value of synergy (positive value) or antagonism (negative value) . A synergy volume is calculated by adding all of the synergy values (positive values) for each drug combination . Likewise, all of the antagonistic values (negative values) are added to give an antagonistic volume . These synergy and antagonism volumes are then statistically evaluated using confidence levels of 95, 99, and 99.9% (expressed as µM2%) . Cytotoxicity assays. MT2 cells and PHAP-stimulated human PBMC were seeded at densities of 3 x 104 and 1 x 105 cells/well, respectively, in 96-well plates containing twofold serial dilutions of DAPD or DXG . For combination cytotoxicity assays, a fixed concentration of RBV (1, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 µM) or MPA (0.01, 0.1 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µM) was added to the DAPD or DXG dilutions . The cultures were incubated for 5 days at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere and were then incubated with XTT for 3 h . Cytotoxicity was determined by comparing absorption values (A450) obtained from the treated cultures with that of the untreated control . Mitochondria DNA assay. The effect of DAPD and DXG alone or in combination with MPA or RBV on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) synthesis was assessed using HepG2 cells . Cells were seeded (5 x 104 cells/well) into 12-well tissue culture plates and incubated for 4 days at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM glutamine . On day 4, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing various concentrations of test compound . For combination experiments, the concentrations of MPA and RBV were held constant (0.25 µM MPA and 20 µM RBV) and the concentrations of DAPD and DXG were varied (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 25, and 50 µM DAPD or DXG) . The cells were incubated for 2 weeks and during the incubation period medium was changed every other day . At the end of the 2 weeks, cells were collected and total cellular DNA was extracted using a DNeasy kit (QIAGEN) . DNA from each sample was denatured by adding an equal volume of denaturing buffer (0.8 M NaOH, 20 mM EDTA) and heating to 100°C for 10 min . The DNA samples were blotted onto positive-charged nylon membranes washed once with 0.4 M NaOH followed by a single wash with 2x SSPE (1x SSPE is 0.18 M NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.7]) . The DNA was cross-linked to the membrane by exposing it to UV light . A specific 32P probe encompassing nucleotide positions 4212 to 4242 of human mtDNA was used to quantitate the level of mtDNA in each sample . Cellular DNA was quantitated using a 32P probe specific for human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase . The quantity of mtDNA was normalized to the amount of cellular DNA resulting in relative mtDNA levels . The levels of mtDNA from the treated cells were compared to those of the untreated cell controls . The data from three experiments were combined, and the data were reported as the means ± the standard deviations .
Mycophenolic acid and RBV were also tested for cytotoxicity in the MT2 cell line and PBMC as described above . MPA was found to be toxic to both cell lines with concentrations required for 50% cell death of 5.7 µM (MT2) and 4.5 µM (PBMC) . RBV was found to not be toxic to either cell line at concentrations up to 1 mM . Activity of DAPD and DXG in combination with MPA and RBV. We evaluated the effect of MPA and RBV on the activity of DAPD and DXG in the MT2/XTT and PBMC/p24 assays as described above . The combination of MPA and RBV with abacavir or AZT was also evaluated . Abacavir was used as a positive control as its active form, carbovir triphosphate, is also a guanosine analogue and has been shown to have synergistic anti-HIV activity when combined with MPA (21) . AZT was used as a control to demonstrate antagonism . Previous studies have demonstrated that the combination of RBV and AZT was antagonistic with regards to HIV replication, presumably as a consequence of increased levels of dTTP which acts as a feedback inhibitor of thymidine kinase activity (3, 34) . In the MT2 cell line, addition of low concentrations of MPA (0.01 µM) had no effect on the anti-HIV activity of any of the compounds tested . We observed that there was a direct relationship between the concentration of MPA or RBV and the activity observed for both DAPD and DXG . The combination of 0.25 µM MPA with DAPD or DXG produced the greatest results (16.7- and 10.5-fold increases in the antiviral activity of DAPD and DXG, respectively) without any cytotoxicity . By contrast, addition of 0.25 µM MPA resulted in a 2.3-fold decrease in the activity of AZT . Little effect was noted on the antiviral activity of abacavir (less than twofold) at any of the MPA concentrations tested . Results are shown in Fig . 1a . No cytotoxicity, as determined by >90% cell viability, was observed at any of the drug combinations tested (data not shown) .
The effects of MPA and RBV on the anti-HIV activity of DAPD, DXG, and abacavir were also evaluated in PBMC . At the lowest concentration of MPA tested, 0.01 µM, there was no change in the EC50 observed for abacavir . In addition, increasing the concentration of MPA to 0.1 µM had a minimal effect on abacavir activity (threefold decrease in EC50) . By contrast, addition of 0.01 µM MPA resulted in a 4.6- and 9.3-fold increase in the antiviral activity of DAPD and DXG, respectively, while 0.1 µM MPA resulted in a 34- and 23-fold increase in activity for these compounds . In all cases, the addition of 0.25 µM MPA resulted in complete suppression of viral replication at all concentrations of DAPD, DXG, or abacavir tested . The combination of 1 µM RBV had only a minimal effect on the anti-HIV activity of DXG, DAPD, and abacavir . Increasing the concentration of RBV to 10 µM resulted in a significant increase in the activity of DAPD, DXG, and abacavir . These results are summarized in Table 1 . The results obtained from the combination of MPA or RBV with DAPD and DXG in PBMC were also evaluated using the MacSynergy II software program . The MacSynergy II program uses an independent effects model (Bliss independence) to generate theoretical volumes of synergy or antagonism for each drug combination . Synergy volumes greater than 25 µM2% are considered synergistic, while volumes between 25 and 25 µM2% are indicative of an additive interaction . Likewise, volumes less than 25 µM2% are considered indicative of antagonism . In this analysis, all of the combinations tested demonstrated synergistic interactions as demonstrated by synergy volumes >25 µM2% (Table 2) . No cytotoxicity, as determined by >90% cell viability, was observed at any of the drug combinations tested (data not shown) .
Both inhibitors of IMPDH were evaluated in this study in combination with DAPD or DXG in an attempt to determine if either RBV or MPA displayed any advantages over the other . Neither RBV nor MPA displayed any anti-HIV activity in the MT2 cell assay . However, both compounds enhanced the activity of DAPD and DXG against wild-type virus . In these assays, addition of 0.25 µM MPA or 20 µM RBV resulted in a greater than 10-fold increase in the anti-HIV activity of DXG . By contrast, neither MPA nor ribavirin had any effect on the anti-HIV activity of abacavir, another guanosine analogue, in the MT2 cell line . In contrast to results obtained in MT2 cells, both MPA and RBV demonstrated anti-HIV activity when tested in PBMC . Unlike MT2 cells, PBMC rely primarily on the de novo synthesis of guanosine and are therefore more susceptible to the effects of IMPDH inhibitors (1) . In these cells, addition of MPA at a concentration of 0.25 µM completely inhibited HIV replication in PBMC when combined with DXG (data not shown) . This concentration of MPA is less than the trough blood concentrations observed for the compound in transplant patients treated with Cellcept and below that required to inhibit T-cell proliferation (1, 30) . Lower concentrations of MPA also had synergistic activity with DAPD and DXG . Similar to what was observed in the MT2 assays, the effect of MPA on the activity of abacavir was less pronounced, especially at the lower concentrations . These differences may be attributed to the differences in substrate specificity between the triphosphate forms of the two compounds for HIV-RT . Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of the rate of incorporation and binding affinity of the compounds for HIV-RT (29; also J . Feng, personal communication) have shown that DXG-TP has a 10-fold selective advantage over carbovir triphosphate . The very low Ki value obtained for DXG-TP against HIV-RT (0.019 µM) suggests that small changes in the intracellular dGTP pools would have a large impact on the activity of the drug observed in cell culture . While RBV was also shown to have similar synergistic anti-HIV activity when combined with DAPD or DXG, the concentrations used in these assays are above the steady-state plasma levels observed in vivo (14) . These studies also demonstrate that the combination of either IMPDH inhibitor restored the ability of DXG to inhibit otherwise resistant HIV . The L74V, K65R, and Q151M mutations have all been shown to confer various levels of resistance to DXG (23) . The combination of 0.2 µM MPA with DXG resulted in a decrease in EC50 of DXG for the highly resistant 65R/151M virus to within twofold of the values obtained for wild-type virus when tested in PBMC . This is equivalent to a greater than 100-fold increase in the activity of DXG against this highly resistant virus . Furthermore, these results were obtained with concentrations of DXG and MPA which were clinically relevant . While RBV also increased the activity of DAPD and DXG against the highly resistant virus, the effect was less pronounced at clinically relevant concentrations of RBV .
Neither MPA nor RBV was cytotoxic to MT2 or PMBC when combined with DAPD or DXG at any of the concentrations tested . When tested in HepG2 cells, MPA at concentrations of 0.50 µM and above did have an effect on cell viability and mtDNA content while RBV alone had no effect on mtDNA at concentrations up to 80 µM . When tested in combination, addition of 0.25 µM MPA did not decrease mtDNA levels compared to levels seen with either DAPD or DXG alone . By contrast, addition of 20 µM RBV to either DAPD or DXG resulted in decreased mtDNA levels . The initial interpretation of the data may appear in conflict, where MPA in combination did not produce an effect on mtDNA synthesis or cytotoxic effect while ribavirin in combination with DAPD or DXG slightly enhanced the reduction of mtDNA . Firstly, the level of MPA required to achieve either a reduction in mtDNA synthesis or a reduction in cell viability is greater than that used in the combination experiments . Secondly, ribavirin, a nucleoside analog, may act synergistically in combination to inhibit the DNA polymerase
Our findings support the use of MPA in combination therapy with DAPD for the treatment of HIV infection . While RBV was also synergistic with DAPD, the high levels required for this activity combined with the potential for mitochondrial toxicity make it a less likely combination . Due to the favorable resistance profile of DAPD, the combination with MPA may be of use in salvage therapy, particularly as a component of HAART . Clinical studies have been initiated to evaluate the combination of DAPD and MPA against HIV in the salvage setting .
What Is Growth Medium?,
What Is Bioreactor?,
What Is Protein?,
What Is Salmonella?,
What Is Botulism?,
e,
Bacterium,
s,
Microbiology,
a,
Microorganisms,
r,
Microorganism,
o,
Bacteriology,
a,
Bacillus,
i,
Cell suspensions,
s,
S. cerevisiae,
s,
Biofilms,
c,
Salmonella typhimurium,
c,
Bacillus,
r,
Biological treatment,
e,
Schizosaccharomyces,
n,
Antibiotics,
a,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Phage,
a,
Streptococci,
e,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
e,
Cephalosporin,
i,
Microorganism,
r,
Gram positive,
n,
Anaerobic bacteria,
r,
Meningococcus,
e,
Bacteriological,
r,
Microbial,
i,
Prokaryotes
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||