|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2004, p . 3671-3673, Vol . 186, No . 12 An Alternative Strategy for Adaptation in Bacterial BehaviorBarry L . Taylor* School of Medicine, Division of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350
The Aer protein is a receptor-transducer in E . coli that senses oxygen and energy by monitoring the redox state of the electron transport system (7, 13) . The C-terminal half of the Aer protein resembles the signaling domains of the chemotaxis receptors Tsr, Tar, Trg, and Tap, which are also known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) (Fig . 1) . The signaling domain of the MCP includes up to five "methylation sites" that are reversibly methylated and demethylated by the CheR and CheB proteins, respectively, to effect adaptation and a highly conserved domain that is the signal output site of the receptor (12, 15, 21) . The output domain interacts with the CheW coupling protein and the CheA histidine kinase, thereby regulating the rate of autophosphorylation of CheA (8) . Phosphorylation of the CheY protein by CheA-P is the signal that controls the direction of rotation of the flagellar motors . The sensing domain of the Aer receptor is in the cytoplasm, whereas the sensing domain of an MCP is in the periplasm, where it senses the external environment (Fig . 1) . An earlier study, conducted before the discovery of Aer, demonstrated a methylation-independent aerotaxis response (11) . An E . coli strain lacking the four methylation-dependent chemotaxis proteins Tsr, Tar, Trg, and Tap displayed aerotactic behavior, including adaptation . Adaptation in aerotaxis was not impaired in methylation-deficient cells, whereas all methylation-dependent adaptation was impaired . However, because the signaling domain of Aer is similar to those of the MCPs and because CheA and CheW are required for signaling by Aer, it was still possible that Aer-mediated aerotaxis would be dependent on methylation for adaptation . The paper by Bibikov et al . (5) demonstrates convincingly that Aer-mediated aerotaxis is independent of methylation . (i) The Aer protein migrated as a single band in gel electrophoresis and was not detectably methylated or demethylated by the CheR and CheB proteins . (ii) Aer promoted aerotactic migrations in semisolid agar in strains that lacked all four of the E . coli MCPs . CheR and CheB had no influence on the rate of aerotactic movements in those strains . (iii) The Aer methylation sites are unorthodox and do not conform to the consensus motif for CheR or CheB substrates . Amino acid mutations in critical residues at the putative Aer methylation sites generally had no deleterious effects on Aer function . In one sense, the finding that Aer-mediated aerotactic responses are methylation independent is surprising because the Aer signaling domain appears to have a common origin with that of the MCPs, but in another sense, this finding is not surprising because the biological universe is remarkably pliable and utilizes diverse strategies to achieve similar outcomes . Across the subset of bacterial species that have been studied, chemotactic mechanisms illustrate the pliable nature of living systems .
Having excluded the possibility that Aer methylation had a role in aerotaxis, Bibikov et al . were able to address the implications for signal transduction in Aer . A chimeric aerotaxis receptor, Aear, was constructed, and this receptor included the PAS and HAMP domains (residues 1 to 269) from Aer and the C-terminal signaling domain and methylation sites from the aspartate chemoreceptor, Tar, which is an orthodox MCP (5) . Aear exhibited both methylation-dependent and methylation-independent aerotactic behavior . A surprising conclusion based on this finding is that methylation-independent adaptation does not emanate from the Aer signaling domain . This conclusion suggests that adaptation in Aer involves the PAS and HAMP domains (Fig . 1) . Another possibility raised by Bibikov et al . is ‘adaptation’ of the redox signal itself . That is, the cellular redox changes that trigger Aer-promoted aerotactic responses may be transient and quickly return to prestimulus levels, ending the aerotaxis response . However, there is as yet no evidence to support such a model . Although Bibikov et al . were able to infer bacterial behavior or bias by observing the spreading of bacteria in semisolid agar, it would be reassuring to have real-time observations of the behavior of individual cells, including bias of the flagellar motors . The sensing domain of Aer is the PAS domain, which has a noncovalently bound flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor (6, 14) (Fig . 1) . A superfamily of PAS domains has been identified in sensory proteins from bacteria to humans, including histidine and serine/threonine kinases, chemoreceptors and photoreceptors for taxis and tropism, circadian clock proteins, voltage-activated ion channels, cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, and proteins involved in regulation of responses to hypoxia (19) . PAS domains invariably sense a cell's internal environment rather than its external environment . Although it appears likely that sensing by the Aer PAS domain involves oxidation-reduction of FAD, the source of the redox changes is unknown . Aer could interact with a component of the electron transport system, for example, or Aer-bound FAD could exchange with a pool of free FAD/FADH that mirrors the respiratory redox state . The advantage of the Aer PAS domain sensing redox status and not oxygen per se is that respiration and energy levels (proton motive force) are intertwined and that E . coli is able to escape not only hypoxia but also a variety of other situations that threaten cellular energy levels (20) . A newly recognized signaling domain in Aer is the HAMP domain that links the membrane sequence to the signaling domain (Fig . 1) . HAMP domains are also found in histidine kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and phosphatases (2) . A signal transduction role for HAMP domains is indicated by genetic analysis of receptors in which HAMP mutations bias the signal transmitted by the protein (24) . Additional mutations that prevent FAD binding to the PAS domain have been identified in the Aer HAMP domain (6, 14) . This finding suggests that contact between the HAMP and PAS domains may stabilize a conformation of the PAS domain that binds FAD . If so, the sensory signal that originates in the PAS domain could be transmitted to the signaling domain across the contact interface between the PAS and HAMP domains . The HAMP domain is contiguous with the signaling domain . The Aear chimera constructed by Bibikov et al . (5) has promise for in vitro and in vivo studies of aerotaxis signal transduction . E . coli cells in which Aer is the only chemotaxis transducer have a smooth swimming bias unless Aer is heavily overexpressed . Bibikov et al . propose that when Aer is replaced by Aear-269, the bias is reset for normal tumbling frequency by methylation of the Aear signaling domain . However, that finding is inferred and definitive information on Aear adaptation must await quantitative analysis of the behavior of individual bacteria . Nevertheless, the Aear chimera holds great promise for the future investigation of Aer signal transduction and may prove to be a most important contribution of the study of Bibikov et al . The analysis of the Aer protein has clearly established that an MCP-like receptor can utilize methylation-independent adaptation to stimuli . How important are the Aer-type behaviors in the microbial world? Bioinformatic analysis of bacterial genomes revealed that only a minority of bacterial species have aerotaxis receptors that resemble Aer . Other species utilize different strategies for aerotaxis, and many of the aerotaxis strategies remain to be identified (I . B . Zhulin, personal communication) . Earlier speculation that Aer might be a pro-MCP is now considered to be wrong because the in silico analysis indicated that it is more likely that the Aer signaling domain originated from an MCP and subsequently lost its methylation capabilities (I . B . Zhulin, personal communication) . An aerotaxis response is universal in motile bacteria . It is not one of the strong responses, and bacteria probably are guided mostly by chemotaxis receptors in the search for nutrients, but in a microenvironment that stresses bacterial energy levels, aerotaxis and energy taxis behaviors dominate over strong chemotactic responses to initiate an emergency response (20) . As a result, E . coli is not trapped in a serine gradient by hypoxia . The Aer-mediated responses may be viewed as avoidance responses that have a role in bacteria similar to that of the "fright and flight" responses mediated by adrenalin in humans .
Studies on aerotaxis in my laboratory were supported by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences .
The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.
What Is Bioreactor?,
What Is Protein?,
What Is Salmonella?,
What Is Environmental Microbiology?,
What Is Listeria Monocytogenes?,
a,
Bacterium,
e,
Microorganisms,
a,
Bacteriology,
r,
Microbe,
c,
Microorganism,
r,
Cephalosporin,
c,
Escherichia coli,
i,
Antimicrobial,
n,
Campylobacter,
s,
Morganella,
e,
Escherichia coli,
n,
Bacillus subtilis,
e,
Typhus,
r,
Enterococci,
i,
Staphylococcus aureus,
e,
Penicillin,
e,
Microorganisms,
r,
S. cerevisiae,
o,
Sepsis,
o,
S. cerevisiae,
e,
Serratia,
e,
Microorganism,
s,
Clostridia,
i,
Escherichia coli,
n,
Antimicrobial,
o,
Antibiotics
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||