|
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2004, p . 4384-4386, Vol . 70, No . 7 Degradation and Turnover of Extracellular DNA in Marine Sediments: Ecological and Methodological ConsiderationsAntonio Dell'Anno* and Cinzia Corinaldesi Department of Marine Sciences, Faculty of Science, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy Received 21 November 2003/ Accepted 5 March 2004 ABSTRACT Degradation rates of extracellular DNA determined in marine sediments were much higher than those in the water column . However, due to the high sediment DNA content, turnover times were much shorter in seawater . Results reported here provide new insights into the role of extracellular DNA in P cycling in marine ecosystems . In all aquatic ecosystems, extracellular DNA concentrations in the sediment are 3 to 4 orders of magnitude higher than those in the water column (4, 7, 8, 9) . Extracellular DNA accumulation in sediments could depend on a complex array of biotic factors (e.g., bacteria-mediated degradation rates) and abiotic factors (e.g., DNA binding to mineral and refractory organic particles) which are responsible for a half-life of sediment extracellular DNA longer than that in the water column (2, 10, 14) . Despite the potential importance of extracellular DNA in lateral gene transfer and biogeochemical cycles (6, 10), information dealing with degradation and turnover rates of extracellular DNA in marine sediments is practically nonexistent (11) . In this study, we investigated degradation and turnover rates of extracellular DNA in coastal sediments of the Mediterranean Sea in order to provide new insights into P cycling through extracellular DNA diagenesis . Study area and sampling. Sediment samples were collected at three coastal stations located in the Adriatic Sea (hereinafter identified as Goro Lagoon, Ancona Harbor, and outside Ancona Harbor) . Sediment samples were collected for the analysis of DNase activity and extracellular DNA content as well as the determination of bacterial abundance, biomass, and carbon production . Moreover, surface water samples were collected for the analyses of DNase activity and dissolved extracellular DNA . Determination of DNase activity.
DNase activity was determined fluorometrically by using a fluorescent DNA analog, poly deoxyribo-1-N6ethenoadenylic acid [poly(d Extracellular DNA in sediments. Extracellular-DNA analyses were carried out according to the nuclease-based procedure described by Dell'Anno et al . (9) . This procedure allows quantification of the bioavailable (i.e., hydrolyzable by nucleases) fraction of the extracellular DNA pool . Extracellular DNA in seawater. In order to quantify the bioavailable fraction of the dissolved extracellular DNA pool in seawater samples, we utilized the nuclease-based procedure described by Siuda and Chrost (15) . Bacterial parameters. Benthic bacterial abundance and biomass were determined by epifluorescence microscopy according to Danovaro et al . (5) . Bacterial production was measured by [3H]leucine incorporation according to the procedure described by van Duyl and Kop (17) for sediments . Kinetic experiments revealed that the half-saturation constant was low for both seawater and sediment samples (Fig . 1a and b) . DNase activity increased linearly with time in both sediment and seawater samples (Fig . 2) . Sediment samples incubated with commercial nucleases reached a plateau of fluorescence after 60 min (Fig . 3) . Results obtained by fluorometric assay with the fluorescent DNA analog and by high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis with high-molecular-weight DNA did not show significant differences (data not shown) .
Information on degradation and turnover rates for extracellular DNA in marine environments is still limited and almost completely restricted to the plankton domain (12, 13) . In this study, we found that degradation rates for extracellular DNA in sediments were 7 to 100 times higher than those for extracellular DNA in the water column . However, due to the high extracellular DNA content in sediments, turnover times were much shorter in seawater (29 to 93 days in sediments versus about 10 h in seawater) . Calculation of turnover times could be biased by quantitative estimates of extracellular DNA pools, which do not reflect actual bioavailability (9, 10) . This was not the case in this study, since we quantified only the bioavailable fraction of the extracellular DNA . Therefore, long turnover times for extracellular DNA in marine sediments are likely the result of the unbalanced ratio between its supply-production and degradation rates . Extracellular DNA concentrations in sediments were, on average, 4.3 times higher than concentrations of DNA associated with total bacterial cells (assuming a conversion factor of 3.3 fg of DNA cell1 [7]) (Table 1), indicating that the majority of the sedimentary DNA pool is not accounted for by living biomass . Previous studies have hypothesized that extracellular DNA in marine sediments might represent an important source of P for bacterial growth and turnover (4, 7, 9) . In order to explore the potential ecological implication of extracellular DNA in benthic biogeochemical processes, we estimated the daily bacterial P requirement on the basis of bacterial C production (assuming a bacterial C/N/P ratio of 40:10:1 [18]) and the daily P supply derived from DNA degradation rates (assuming for DNA an average P content of 10% [1]) . From these estimates, we calculated that extracellular DNA might potentially supply, on average for the three sampling sites, 41% of the daily bacterial P requirement . Although further studies are needed to clarify the ecological role of extracellular DNA, our results suggest that extracellular DNA degradation may play an important role in P cycling in marine ecosystems .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was carried out in the frame of the program ADIOS (Atmospheric Deposition and Impact of pollutants, key elements and nutrients on the Open Mediterranean Sea), financially supported by EC funding under contract no . EVK3-CT-2000-00035 . We thank E . Manini and G . M . Luna for their help during sampling activities and S . Bompadre for his precious assistance during high-pressure liquid chromatography analyses .
REFERENCES
What Is Salmonella?,
What Is Fermentation?,
What Is Genetic Engineering?,
What Is Antibiotic?,
What Is Functional Genomics?,
o,
Microorganism,
n,
Bacterium,
s,
Bacteriology,
c,
Bacteria,
s,
Microbe,
c,
Cell cultures,
c,
Multidrug resistant,
i,
Microorganism,
e,
Yeasts,
i,
Streptococcal,
a,
Serratia,
s,
Antimicrobials,
e,
Yeasts,
i,
Antibiotics,
n,
Klebsiella,
s,
Sepsis,
a,
Water treatment,
n,
Klebsiella,
n,
S. cerevisiae,
c,
Botulism,
o,
Vibriosis,
a,
Neisseria,
s,
Fermentations,
i,
Antibiotic prophylaxis,
o,
Escherichia coli,
o,
Cell cultures
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||