|
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2004, p . 3407-3411, Vol . 48, No . 9 Paradoxical Effect of Caspofungin: Reduced Activity against Candida albicans at High Drug ConcentrationsDavid A . Stevens,1,2,3* Marife Espiritu,3 and Rachana Parmar3 Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose,1 Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford,2 California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, California3 Received 16 January 2004/ Returned for modification 21 February 2004/ Accepted 25 May 2004
(This paper was presented in part at the 14th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Prague, Czech Republic, 1 to 4 May 2004.)
Susceptibility testing. Broth macrodilution and microdilution testing (13) utilizing an 80% turbidity endpoint (6), determination of the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) (20), incorporation of drug into agar (2), assays of drug diffusion into agar containing organisms (16), and macrodilution checkerboard-type drug interaction studies (3) were performed as detailed elsewhere . The medium used, except where otherwise specified, was RPMI 1640 (13), which, along with yeast nitrogen broth (YNB) (7) and synthetic amino acid medium-fungi (SAAMF) (9), was prepared as previously described . Caspofungin was purchased from the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center pharmacy as the product for clinical use, and micafungin and anidulafungin powders were provided by Fujisawa Healthcare (Deerfield, Ill.) and Eli Lilly & Co . (Indianapolis, Ind.), respectively . With several isolates, caspofungin powder provided by Merck Research Laboratories (West Point, Pa.) gave results indistinguishable from those with the clinical preparation .
Demonstration of paradoxical effect on killing and definition of the range of inhibition.
In subsequent studies, the lower range of drug dilutions was expanded to define the range of the effect . A representative study with one of the isolates from the preceding group is shown in Table 1 (isolate 95-68, growth) . There were always three to six clear tubes between the two ranges of growth (three isolates, each tested five times) . These studies also define the MIC below the
In these studies, MFCs were determined in order to ensure that the turbidity noted at the highest concentrations represented organisms that were viable at the time turbidity in the tubes was scored . A typical result is shown in Table 1 (isolate 95-68, MFC plate) . In every experiment, and in all those described below, the paradoxical effect on turbid growth was accompanied by the same effect on killing . One may note in Table 1 the survival of a few colonies at a concentration just below that which fails to inhibit visible growth . Further definition of the amount of inhibition at drug concentrations that do, in contrast, permit turbid growth is addressed below . The effect of higher concentrations of caspofungin: the mini-paradoxical effect. The studies described thus far have defined the paradoxical effect at drug concentrations up to 12.5 µg/ml . That range was derived largely from clinical susceptibility testing, since higher concentrations of the drug in blood are not achievable with present doses (4) and thus were thought to be irrelevant . Although the availability and expense of drug supplies also affect the range of concentrations that can be routinely studied, it was of interest to see, with selected isolates, whether the paradoxical effect could be demonstrated in isolates that did not otherwise show it by expanding the range . In the second group of isolates, the 14 that did not demonstrate the paradoxical effect were restudied at drug concentrations up to 50 µg/ml . One isolate showed the paradoxical effect, but only with trace growth and only at 25 µg/ml . In contrast, six isolates did not show the effect . With the remaining seven isolates, another phenomenon was seen . Although clear tubes were noted at up to 50 µg of caspofungin/ml, from tubes at 12.5 and/or 25 µg/ml, subcultures revealed 4 to 27 colonies/MFC plate . It should be noted that these seven isolates did not show (i) either turbidity in any tubes or colonies on subculture at concentrations of 0.025 to 6.25 or 12.5 µg/ml or (ii) either turbidity or growth on subculture at 50 µg/ml . The former finding describes a subthreshold version of the paradoxical effect (called the mini-paradoxical effect), in which apparently the survival of only a small number of cells becomes possible in the presence of a high concentration of drug . This finding suggests that, whatever the mechanism of resistance at high drug concentrations, it may be overcome by even higher concentrations . This observation is supported by anotherthe appearance, in a series of tubes with doubling drug dilutions, of turbidity in tubes at increasing concentrations, then a further increase in turbidity, and finally a decline in turbidity as the drug concentration further ascends (e.g., Table 1, isolate 03-178, growth) . The patterns just described indicate that the paradoxical effect is quadriphasic: growth below the MIC; inhibition above the MIC (for three to six tubes in the drug series); then, in the isolates showing the effect, release of inhibition at higher concentrations; and finally, inhibition again at the highest drug concentrations . Another isolate, used in many animal model studies (21), that was studied concurrently showed only the mini-paradoxical effect (at 6.25 and 12.5 µg/ml), with colonies appearing only after 5 days of incubation . Thus, in this series of experiments, of 15 isolates that did not demonstrate the paradoxical effect, 8 (53%) showed the mini-paradoxical effect . The preceding sets of results raise the issue of whether, if drug concentrations are elevated high enough, a paradoxical or mini-paradoxical effect might be seen in all Candida albicans isolates . However, studies at up to 400 µg/ml with two of the isolates that failed to show these effects at concentrations up to 50 µg/ml still failed to demonstrate turbidity or positive subcultures . Magnitude of growth permitted at high concentrations. Isolates 95-68, 95-142, and 98-8 were studied to quantitate the amount of growth, corresponding to turbid tubes, permitted at high drug concentrations . Tubes of isolate 95-68 were prepared by the standard method (13) (10 each at 0 and 12.5 µg of caspofungin/ml for the usual 48 h), and cell pellets were prepared by centrifugation . The pellets in the 0-µg/ml tube were 0.01 ml each, and the pellets in the 12.5-µg/ml tube were 0.008 ml each (means), i.e., 80% of the volume in the absence of drug . All three isolates were also inoculated into tubes with 0 and 12.5 µg of drug/ml, and at 48 h, subcultures were made from the pairs of turbid tubes . The subcultured fluid was serially 10-fold diluted, and the dilutions were plated in triplicate (20) . CFU were enumerated on plates with 10 to 100 colonies . Growth in the absence of drug revealed 106.7, 106.8, and 106.9 CFU/ml (means), and in 12.5 µg/ml, 105.7, 102.6, and 104.5 CFU/ml . However, the accuracy of the CFU determination was questioned, because it was noted that there was clumping of the growth in drug . Microscopic observation of the growth in drug revealed budding yeast typical of C . albicans growth but failure of daughter cell separation in the presence of drug compared to growth in the absence of drug . The fact that there was still a drug effect on growth at the high concentration was also noted in another observation; subcultures for MFC determination from tubes showing the paradoxical effect demonstrated tiny colonies, particularly in the initial 10-fold dilutions, compared to colonies from subcultures of the drug-free growth . To test whether this observation was related to a new property of the cells growing at high drug concentrations rather than a continuing effect of the drug carried over from the tube to the subculture, an experiment was performed in which subcultures from tubes with 12.5 µg of drug/ml were pelleted by centrifugation, washed with fresh RPMI 1640 medium, recentrifuged, and resuspended in fresh medium, as opposed to no treatment of the subculture . The washed cells produced much larger colonies, corroborating a drug effect, as suggested by the clumping and the failure of bud separation in broth noted earlier . Because of possible inaccuracies in quantitating the growth permitted, a population analysis was performed in another experiment by subculture of drug-free growth to RPMI agar plates (100 cells/plate, in triplicate, per isolate) containing 0 or 12.5 µg of caspofungin/ml . This method demonstrated that survival was 72, <1, and 38% (the percentage of CFU on the drug-containing plates relative to the drug-free plates) for the three isolates; this is the same rank order as quantitated growth of the three isolates from liquid medium with 12.5 µg of caspofungin/ml in the preceding experiment . The data for isolate 95-68 were also similar for percent volume of packed cells growing in drug compared to in the absence of drug and for this population analysis result . Phenotype of survivors at high concentrations. To determine if there was possible selection of a resistant subpopulation in the growth permitted at high drug concentrations, colonies were selected from the plates subcultured from tubes with turbid growth at 12.5 µg of drug/ml (isolates 95-142, 95-68, and 98-8) . Five colonies were selected for each isolate, and each was regrown in the absence of drug to produce an inoculum for susceptibility testing . In 15 of 15 instances, the progeny did not demonstrate total resistance but reproduced the paradoxical effect in the same fashion as the parent, which was tested concurrently . Integrity of drug at high concentrations. To assess whether the mechanism of resistance at high drug concentrations might be due to alteration by cells of the drug in tubes, the following experiment was performed . Isolate 95-68 was grown in the presence of 12.5 µg of drug/ml for the usual incubation time (13), and an identical tube, but without fungal cells, was incubated for the same period . At the end of the incubation, the tube with cells was centrifuged to pellet the cells, and the supernatant was aspirated for bioassay in triplicate, along with the contents of the uninoculated tube . The drug was present at 10.5 and 10.4 µg/ml, respectively, indicating no destruction of the drug by a subpopulation of the cells to explain the resistance noted .
Effects of medium and method.
To assess the effect of the medium on the paradoxical effect, three media (RPMI 1640, the medium used in all studies described above; SAAMF; and YNB) were studied with each of three isolates demonstrating the paradoxical effect at drug concentrations of 0.39 to 50 µg/ml . The paradoxical effect was seen in all nine instances . The effect was modestly less pronounced in YNB and more pronounced in SAAMF compared to RPMI . For example, isolates showed only turbid growth at
We have already indicated that the paradoxical effect can be seen in broth dilution and on agar plates containing caspofungin . Isolates were also incorporated into agar to form lawns of growth as in a bioassay (16), and twofold dilutions of caspofungin (0.39 to 25 µg/ml) in distilled water were placed in wells cut in the agar . With all three isolates demonstrating the paradoxical effect in broth dilution that were studied, clear zones were produced with 0.39 or 0.78 to 25 µg of drug/ml . Interestingly, each twofold-higher drug concentration produced a larger zone than the concentration below it, and no colonies were noted growing within the zones .
Specificity of the paradoxical effect among echinocandins.
Forty-six clinical isolates of C . albicans from micafungin clinical trials and 14 isolates from the present study (which did not show the caspofungin paradoxical effect) were tested for susceptibility to micafungin at concentrations from 0.06 to 16 µg/ml; the paradoxical effect was not noted (all MICs were
Effect of a second antifungal on paradoxical effect. The effect of the interaction of a second antifungal with caspofungin on the paradoxical effect was of interest . Fluconazole and caspofungin were therefore studied in standard checkerboards with isolates 95-142, 95-68, and 98-8 (the last is susceptible to fluconazole; the others are resistant) .
With isolate 98-8, the interaction seen in the caspofungin MIC range was synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index,
Trailing endpoint isolate. An isolate (03-202), one of several selected from a multicenter collaborative study of in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin that were believed to show a trailing endpoint up to high caspofungin concentrations, was kindly provided by Frank C . Odds . We found this isolate to be susceptible to caspofungin (MIC, 0.09 µg/ml) but to display a protracted paradoxical effect . At 0.19 to 0.39 µg/ml, clear tubes were noted, but from the 0.39-µg/ml tube, many colonies were subcultured on the MFC plate . At 0.78 µg/ml, trace growth appeared, with the turbidity increasing in ascending drug concentrations to a maximum (2+) at 6.25 µg/ml and then declining, so that at 25 to 50 µg/ml, clear tubes were produced with no colonies on subculture . With isolates such as this, if sufficiently low drug concentrations are not used in screening, the chance of defining a drug effect as prominent as the abolition of visible growth could be missed .
Candida species other than C . albicans.
Caspofungin broth dilution testing was performed with 47 isolates of other Candida species (20 C . glabrata, 9 C . parapsilosis, 8 C . tropicalis, 3 C . kefyr, 3 C . krusei, 2 C . lusitaniae, 1 C . zeylanoides, and 1 C . intermedia), and the paradoxical effect was seen only in 1 C . tropicalis and 2 C . parapsilosis isolates . With one of the latter, none of the tubes in the zone of clear tubes between the MIC and paradoxical growth achieved the
We have shown that this growth is not due to selection of a resistant subpopulation . If it were due to a resistant subpopulation, one would expect to see the paradoxical growth at all concentrations above the MIC and possibly preferentially at lower concentrations, not preferentially at higher concentrations . Moreover, we show that progeny of the growth at high concentrations retain the phenotype of the parent . The effect can occur to the point of producing turbid growth, but a similar propensity, to a lesser degree (i.e., in a smaller fraction of the cell population), so that only incomplete killing occurs at higher concentrations (the mini-paradoxical effect), appears to occur more commonly among isolates . We have shown that the paradoxical effect occurs in broth dilution and agar dilution (where the drug is incorporated into agar) but is not seen when the drug is diffused from wells into agar supporting fungal growth . Methodological differences in results are reminiscent of reports of "resistance" to caspofungin demonstrable by some methods (agar dilution) but not others (broth dilution) (18) . We note that the situation where the drug diffuses into agar (which, like broth or agar dilution, can also be used to define the susceptibility of an isolate [the M'IC; defined in reference 9]) is, in contrast to broth or agar dilution, the only method where the isolate does not experience a constant drug concentration during the incubation period . In the first method, the isolate experiences a changing concentration of drug during its growth as the drug diffuses radially into the agar . The method dependence we observed is consistent with the hypothesis that the paradoxical effect is due to derepression (or activation) of a resistance mechanism induced by constant high drug concentrations . The hypothesized derepression or activation occurs rapidly, in 48 h of a single pass in the presence of drug . The ability to derepress would provide a survival advantage in the presence of drug to some strains or their subpopulations . This survival advantage could occur in nature, since the class of echinocandins represents various synthetic modifications of a natural product . The appearance of this phenomenon is not a consequence of the introduction of the echinocandins into clinical use, since most strains in which we demonstrated the paradoxical effect were isolated prior to such introduction . The putative derepressed resistance mechanism could be related to an intrinsic change in the target glucan synthase complex, access to it, compensatory upregulation of synthesis of another wall component, etc . An analogous phenomenon has been described in some bacteria in the presence of penicillin (5) . Penicillin, analogous to caspofungin's effect on fungi, acts by blocking microbial cell wall synthesis . A similar paradoxical effect with semisynthetic penicillins has been attributed to derepression in bacteria of a resistance gene by high drug concentrations (10) . An alternative explanation for the paradoxical effect could be an alteration in the physical state of the drug (e.g., aggregation) at high concentrations, but such a hypothesis would not easily explain the presence of the effect in some Candida isolates but its absence in others, the suppression at very high concentrations, or the persistence of most of the drug in active form at the end of incubation, and clinically, infusion of high concentrations of the intravenous preparations appears not to be attended by drug inactivation problems . The most extreme example of the paradoxical effect was the highly selected isolate, 03-202, which may have the cells most sensitive to derepression, since breakthrough growth occurred in concentrations as low as 0.39 µg/ml (even in RPMI) . Identifying isolates with trailing endpoints may be an easy way to find, in large-scale screens of susceptibility, isolates with a propensity for paradoxical growth at concentrations just above the MIC . One of the four "random" isolates demonstrating the paradoxical effect uncovered in routine susceptibility testing also had this extensive phenotype . The paradoxical effect appears to have no analogy to the phenomenon of heteroresistance described (11) in some C . albicans strains with azoles, as there is no evidence that strains showing the paradoxical effect have resistant clones at low concentrations (but above the MIC and MFC) of caspofungin (all cells are inhibited and killed) . The paradoxical effect requires high concentrations of drug, which in a single exposure (as opposed to repeated or prolonged exposure to drug) rapidly induces resistance, and in a high proportion of cells; the drug exposure selects only for transient resistance (the progeny revert in a single pass to the same phenotype as the parent), and colonies from strains showing the paradoxical effect do not appear within a zone resulting from the diffusion of drug from wells . The hypothesized derepressed resistance mechanism does not involve destruction of the drug by a fraction of the fungal cells . Whether the mechanism could be related to the ability of some C . albicans isolates to switch phenotypes (19), a potential survival advantage in some situations, is the subject of study, as are any possible relationship with azole resistance mechanisms; assessment of possible mutations in resistance-associated regions of FKS1, a gene encoding a key protein in glucan synthase; and measurement of glucan synthase enzyme activity in the cells exposed to the drug . The possible in vivo significance of the paradoxical effect is also under study in an animal model . An effect in which up to 72% of a fungal population can survive in vitro in the presence of high drug concentrations could conceivably have in vivo consequences . Correlation of the effect in isolates in association with caspofungin clinical treatment successes versus failures would be of interest, if such isolates were available . If there is in vivo significance for the paradoxical effect, it may prove useful to know that a second drug can act cooperatively, in the presence of caspofungin, to clear the paradoxical growth as shown, although an in vivo demonstration of the cooperative effect would be needed (8) .
What Is Genetic Engineering?,
What Is Bioassay?,
What Is Prokaryote?,
What Is Biotechnology?,
What Is Staphylococcus Aureus?,
n,
Microbe,
e,
Microbes,
c,
Microorganisms,
i,
Microbiology,
c,
Bacteriology,
i,
Streptococcal,
r,
Agrobacterium,
r,
S. cerevisiae,
c,
Escherichia coli,
o,
Yeasts,
n,
Microbiological,
a,
Bacillus,
o,
Escherichia coli,
c,
Lactobacillus,
o,
Streptococci,
i,
Yeasts,
o,
S. cerevisiae,
a,
Bacteriological,
i,
Bacillus subtilis,
n,
Citrobacter,
s,
S. cerevisiae,
s,
Candida tropicalis,
s,
Salmonella typhimurium,
n,
Microbiological,
a,
Cell cultures,
i,
Staphylococcus
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||