|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2004, p . 895-902, Vol . 186, No . 4
|
| TEXT |
|---|
Tuberculosis remains a worldwide threat despite the availabilityof
the BCG vaccine and antibiotic treatment . It is estimatedthat its
etiologic agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, infectsalmost a
third of the human population and kills two millionpeople every year
[27] . The recent human immunodeficiency virus
pandemic, the selection of multidrug-resistant strains of M.
tuberculosis, and the increased immigration from countries witha
high tuberculosis incidence, coupled with increasing povertyand
homelessness in these countries, have awakened the developednations
from the widespread apathy toward tuberculosis [36].
Indeed, recent years have seen great progress in the molecular
characterization of this efficient human pathogen [26,
61].However, much work is still needed to
understand how M . tuberculosiscopes with the numerous
environments it encounters in the courseof a successful infection .
Adaptation to such conditions mustrequire a complex regulation of
gene expression.
The main stresses faced during infection can be summarized as follows . The first stress is exposure to oxidizing agents, principally represented by the reactive oxygen intermediates and reactive nitrogen intermediates, produced by activated macrophages . Thesecond is exposure to low pH . Even if M . tuberculosis is ableto block phagosome acidification, this block is not completeas the mycobacterial phagosome undergoes a slight decrease inpH [21] . The third is damage of surface structures . Alveolarsurfactant is a mild detergent with antibacterial activity andcould damage the structure of its fatty acid-rich cell envelope.In addition, toxic peptides and proteins like granulysin, thoughtto act at the level of the bacterial surface, are released byactivated macrophages and NK cells . Specifically, granulysinhas been recently shown to be essential for M . tuberculosiskilling after apoptosis of infected macrophages induced by NKcells [22] . Finally, toxic free fatty acids, secreted from macrophagesboth inside the mycobacterial phagosome and in the externalenvironment, exhibit their toxicity when interacting with themycobacterial surface [2] . The fourth is hypoxia, especially inside granulomas but also inside the phagosome . This environmental condition is actually the best candidate for the induction of persistence [also called dormancy or latency], a phenomenonof great importance in M . tuberculosis pathogenesis but stillnot well understood at the molecular level [68] . Recent experiments have implicated the transcriptional regulator DosR [dormancy survival regulator] [10, 51, 71], also known as DevR [18], and the response regulator MprA [72] in mycobacterial persistence.Interestingly, Voskuil et al . [67] recently showed that theDosR regulon is induced following NO-dependent inhibition ofaerobic respiration . The fifth is nutrient and essential-elementstarvation . Inside phagosomes and granulomas, the availabilityof nutrients and essential elements may be reduced, as was recentlyshown for iron [31; J . Timm et al., unpublished data] and Mg2+ [12; S . Walters and I . Smith, unpublished data] . Also, duringtransmission [between expulsion from an infected patient andinhalation by a new host], M . tuberculosis must face other environmentalstresses such as nutrient starvation, exposure to UV light,dehydration, and low temperature.
The M . tuberculosis genome [14, 29]
encodes about 190 transcriptionalregulators: 13
factors, 11 two-component systems, 5 unpairedresponse regulators, 11
protein kinases [3], and more than 140other
putative transcriptional regulators [9] . Several of these
regulators have been characterized; some of them respond to
environmental stresses such as cold shock [60], heat shock [41,
63], hypoxia [18, 51,
59], iron starvation [56], surface stress
[41], and oxidative stress [42,
55], while others respond tostill unknown
environmental conditions [28, 52,
72] . The resultingpicture is still incomplete,
but it suggests very complex regulatorysystems with overlapping
functions and redundancies . For example,the heat shock response is
determined by the activation of fiveoverlapping regulons under the
transcriptional control of three
factors [SigB, SigE, and SigH] [41, 42,
43] and two other transcriptionalregulators [HspR
and HrcA] [63].
In this review, we will principally discuss
factors . Prokaryoticcore RNA polymerase [RNAP] is composed of four
distinct subunits:ß, ß',
,
and an
dimer . A fifth subunit,the
factor, reversibly associates with RNAP, forming the RNAPholoenzyme,
and provides the promoter recognition function.The number of
factors encoded in a genome is quite variableand ranges from a
minimum of one in Mycoplasma sp . [30,
37]to a maximum of 65 in Streptomyces coelicolor A3[2]
[6] . M.tuberculosis encodes 13 different
putative
factors [14, 32,
34] . It is generally observed that every
factor has its ownspecificity, allowing the initiation of
transcription of differentsubsets of genes . Genes belonging to a
defined regulon oftenparticipate in related cellular functions .
Therefore, temporalvariation in active
factor populations may represent a powerfulway for M .
tuberculosis to modulate its gene expression profilesin
accordance with physiological requirements and thus achievea
successful infection.
CLASSIFICATION OF
FACTORS
factors can be divided in two groups that are phylogenetically
distinct: those related to
70
and those related to
54
[70].While all eubacteria encode at least one
factor belonging tothe
70
class, not all of them encode one belonging to the
54
class . Since the latter family of
factors is not representedin mycobacteria, it will not be discussed
any further . The
70
family can be further divided into three groups, depending on
their structure and function: [i] primary
factors, [ii] nonessentialprimary factor-like
factors, and [iii] alternative
factors[70] . All eubacterial genomes encode one
primary
factor . Itis usually essential and allows the transcription of
housekeepinggenes . Escherichia coli
70
and Bacillus subtilis
A
are partof this category, and in M . tuberculosis, this group
is representedby
A
[23, 33].
The
factors belonging to the second group [primary factor-like
factors] are nonessential under standard physiologic growth
conditions and are highly similar to primary
factors . Theycan be involved in different functions . In
enterobacteria, theyare usually involved in stationary-phase
survival [RpoS]; incyanobacteria, they are involved in the circadian
cycle andin carbon and nitrogen utilization [
B
and
C
of Synechococcussp.]; and they are involved in antibiotic
biosynthesis in streptomycetes[HrdD] [70] . In
M . tuberculosis, they are represented by
B
[23].
The third group, that of alternative
factors, is the most heterogeneousand can be divided into numerous
subgroups . In M . tuberculosis,they are represented by
F
[20], belonging to the subgroup thatalso contains
the stress response-sporulation
factors in bacilliand streptomycetes, and by
C,
D,
E,
G,
H,
I,
J,
K,
L,
and
M,
belonging to the subgroup of the extracellular function [ECF]
factors . ECF
factors are environmentally responsive regulators,and bacteria
usually contain several members of the ECF familythat control a
variety of functions in response to specificextracellular
environmental signals, such as the presence ofmisfolded proteins in
the periplasm, the presence of light,changes in osmolarity or
barometric pressure, and the presenceof toxic molecules in the
external environment [45, 70] . Examples
are E . coli
E,
which controls the response to extreme heat shock[1];
AlgU, which controls alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas
aeruginosa; FecI, which controls iron uptake in E . coli; CarQ,
which controls carotenoid biosynthesis in Myxococcus xanthus;
and P . syringae HrpL, which controls the synthesis of a virulence
factor that functions during plant infections [45,
70].
MYCOBACTERIAL
FACTOR GENOMICS In addition to the annotated M . tuberculosis
H37Rv and CDC1551genomes [14, 29],
almost complete DNA sequence data are nowavailable for several
mycobacterial species . Examination ofthese genomes shows that
factor genes and their loci are wellconserved across the genus, even
though there are some exceptions.In Table 1 are
listed the orthologs of the 13 M . tuberculosis
factors in other mycobacterial species.
|
The locus containing the genes encoding the principal and principal
factor-like
factors [sigA and sigB] is well conserved in the
completely sequenced mycobacterial genomes available for analysis[23;
R . Provvedi, unpublished data].
Interestingly, M . leprae sigF is a pseudogene and M . avium and
M . paratuberculosis have two genes encoding a
F-like
proteinin different chromosomal loci . Of the two sigF-like
genes, onlythe one encoding a
F-like
protein with greater similarity toM . tuberculosis
F
is preceded by the gene encoding its own putativenegative regulator
[anti-
factor], UsfX, as in M . tuberculosis[Provvedi, unpublished].
The genes encoding the ECF
factors show more variability . Aspreviously reported, massive gene
decay has occurred in M . leprae,in which only sigC and
sigE have functional homologs . All ofthe other ECF
genes are pseudogenes, with the exception ofsigL, whose locus
is deleted [15] . It has recently been proposed
that the loss of functional
factors initiated pseudogene accumulationin this bacterium [4] .
In contrast, all M . tuberculosis ECF
factor genes have an ortholog in M . bovis . The annotated sigM
locus is a pseudogene, but this could be due to a mistake in
the available sequence, which is not yet completely assembled.
However, M . bovis BCG Pasteur lacks sigI as this locus is deleted,
while in its genome, the sigH and sigM loci are duplicated [11].
Other differences we noted in the M . avium and M . paratuberculosis
genomes are the lack of clear orthologs of sigK and sigI and
the presence of four ECF
factor genes encoding putative proteinssimilar to SigI/SigJ,
suggesting that these species have moreECF
factors than M . tuberculosis [Provvedi, unpublished] . InM .
avium, sigL has a frameshift, but as is the case for sigM
in M . bovis, this could also be due to a mistake in the available
sequence . In M . marinum, we could find clear orthologs for all
of the 13 M . tuberculosis
factors, with the exception of sigI.As in M . avium and
M . paratuberculosis, we also found four additionalECF
factors genes . One of these encodes a protein very similarto
C
[Provvedi, unpublished].
The genome that shows the ECF
factor gene pattern that is themost different from that of M .
tuberculosis is that of the fast-growingmycobacterium M .
smegmatis . It was not possible to find orthologsof sigC,
sigI, and sigK, but there are at least seven or eight
additional open reading frame showing similarity to ECF
factorgenes in this genome [Provvedi, unpublished] . Also in this
case,the genome sequence data, reportedly complete, are not yet
assembled,preventing a complete and accurate analysis . The data
extractedfrom these genomes support a rough correlation between the
numberof
factors encoded in a genome and the diversity of possibleniches for
a given bacterium.
EXPRESSION OF M . TUBERCULOSIS
FACTORS All of the 13 M . tuberculosis
factors are expressed duringexponential growth [38,
41] . Quantitative reverse transcription-PCRshowed
that the amount of sigA-specific mRNA is constant during
exponential growth and that it can be used as an internal invariant
standard for mRNA quantitation when cells are growing eitherin broth
or in macrophages [25] . The mRNA levels of some
factorschange when the cells are subjected to stress; e.g., both
sigBand sigE mRNA levels increase when the cells are
exposed tosodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]-induced surface stress [41,
43].Levels of the same two mRNAs and that of
sigH also increaseafter heat shock and exposure to diamide [a
thiol-specific oxidizingagent] [41,
42] . It is interesting that sigF, sigE, and
sigHwere induced during infection of macrophages, suggesting
theirinvolvement in virulence [35] . Other studies
have recently shownthat sigB, sigF, sigE, and
sigD were induced after prolongednutrient starvation [8] .
Finally, sigJ was recently shown tobe induced in
stationary-phase cultures, and the high levelof sigJ mRNA was
maintained after a 5-day treatment with rifampin[38].
FACTOR POSTTRANSLATIONAL REGULATION IN M . TUBERCULOSIS Even
though mRNA levels of
factor genes are frequently inducedunder a given condition, the
activity at the protein level mayalso be regulated by a family of
proteins called anti-
factors.These proteins can bind to a specific
factor, keeping it inan inactive form . In the presence of a specific
stimulus, theanti-
factor releases the
factor, which becomes active . Moreover,another class of proteins,
the anti-anti-
factors, can inhibitanti-
factor activity [39] . M . tuberculosis alternative
factors
E,
F,
H,
and
L
are each closely linked to a gene encoding aputative anti-
factor . The M . tuberculosis genome contains anotherputative
anti-
factor-encoding gene [Rv0093c], not associatedwith any
factor gene, and seven genes encoding putative anti-anti-
factors . The function of some of these molecules will be discussed
later.
A,
THE PRIMARY
FACTOR
A
[also known as RpoV] is believed to be the principal
factorof M . tuberculosis because inactivation of its genetic
determinant,sigA, has not been possible in both M .
smegmatis and M . tuberculosis[33; J .
Timms and I . Smith, unpublished data] . Its consensuspromoter
sequence is shown in Table 2.
|
It was the first mycobacterial
factor to be associated withvirulence . An arginine-to-histidine
substitution at amino acidresidue 515 [R515H] caused attenuation of
M . bovis virulencein a guinea pig model of infection [16] .
This mutation was localizedto the C terminus of the protein, in a
conserved domain knownto interact with transcriptional activators in
other bacteria[24] . Since the mutant strain grew
normally in vitro, it wassuggested that the mutant protein was still
able to drive theexpression of the housekeeping genes but was
deficient for bindingto some virulence-specific transcriptional
activators . It wasrecently shown that
A
interacts with the putative transcriptionalregulator WhiB3 and that
this interaction is lost in the R515Hmutant [64] .
Interestingly, a deletion of whiB3 in M . bovisresulted
in attenuation of M . bovis virulence as in the original
sigA R515H mutant, but an M . tuberculosis whiB3 mutant was only
partially attenuated for virulence . Since
A
is the same in M.tuberculosis and M . bovis, this
different phenotype is probablydue to their different genetic
backgrounds [64] . The WhiB familyin M .
tuberculosis includes seven members . Related proteinsin
Streptomyces coelicolor are involved in sporulation, septation,
and cell wall deposition [62].
B,
A PRIMARY FACTOR-LIKE
FACTOR sigB, the gene encoding
B,
is almost identical to the last 600bp of sigA and is
localized approximately 3 kb downstream ofsigA in all of the
mycobacterial species thus far analyzed [23].In
contrast to the latter, sigB is dispensable for growth bothin
M . smegmatis and in M . tuberculosis [M . Gomez and I . Smith,
unpublished data] . An M . tuberculosis sigB knockout mutant is
more sensitive to various environmental stresses, such as SDS-induced
surface stress, heat shock, and oxidative stress, but it is
still able to grow normally in human macrophages and is not
attenuated in mice [Gomez and Smith, unpublished] . sigB regulation
is complex; it is induced following exposure to surface or oxidative
stress and after heat shock [41] . Moreover, its
transcriptionunder physiological conditions and its induction after
surfacestress are dependent on
E,
while during heat shock or oxidativestress, its induction is
dependent on
H
[42, 55] . In vitro transcription
experiments recently showed that the sigB promoter can be
transcribedby RNAP containing
E,
H,
or
L,
suggesting the necessity forits induction under very different
stress conditions [S . Rodrigueet al., unpublished data].
The subdomains of
B
that are responsible for promoter recognitionare almost identical to
those of
A
[23, 53] . It is thus tempting
to speculate that
A
and
B
recognize similar promoter sequencesand that their respective
regulons partially overlap, as isthe case with RpoS and
70
in E . coli [65].
B
could functionas a "backup" to maintain the transcription of
essential housekeepinggenes during exposure to stress, when
A
could be inactive orits levels could be lowered . The role of
B
will be clarifiedwhen more genes that require it for their
transcription areidentified . In this regard, it was reported that
overexpressionof
B
in M . smegmatis and M . bovis BCG caused an increase in
katG expression, but it is not known whether this is a direct
transcriptional effect [46] . To generate a better
B
consensussequence, we are currently using DNA microarrays to find
moregenes in the
B
regulon and preliminary results indicate thatseveral heat shock
genes require
B
for their expression [P.Fontan and I . Smith, unpublished data].
F,
A
FACTOR REQUIRED FOR FULL VIRULENCE sigF, encoding
F,
is part of a gene cluster with an organizationsimilar to that of the
B . subtilis sigF and sigB operons . Inthis locus, the
anti-sigma factor-encoding gene usfX [originallyannotated
rsbW like in the Tuberculist database; RsbW is theB . subtilis
ortholog] is directly upstream of the
factor gene[19] . In B . subtilis,
F
is involved in sporulation, while
B
is a general stress response
factor whose expression is activatedby heat, alcohol, osmotic
stress, and entry into stationaryphase [70] . The
M . tuberculosis gene encoding
F
is induced inM . smegmatis and M . bovis BCG after
exposure to several antibiotics,hypoxia, cold shock, oxidative
stress, and entry into stationaryphase [20,
44] . However, its induction was not observed in M.
tuberculosis after cold shock, hypoxia, oxidative stress, or
entry into stationary phase [38, 41] .
This suggests that sigFis regulated differently in M .
bovis and M . tuberculosis, despitethe similarity of these
organisms . These findings, togetherwith those regarding the
difference between the effects of whiB3inactivation in M .
tuberculosis and M . bovis, discussed above,suggest that
caution should be used when extrapolating resultsobtained in one
species when coping with phenomena as complexas global gene
regulation and virulence.
usfX and sigF are transcribed from the
F-dependent
promoterusfXP1 [Table 2], located directly
upstream of usfX . The activityof
F
is posttranslationally regulated by its cognate anti-sigmafactor,
UsfX . The latter protein is in turn posttranslationallyregulated by
two anti-anti-sigma factors, RsfA and RsfB . Bothare able to disrupt
the UsfX-
F
complex, releasing
F
to allowits association with RNAP . The function of RsfA is regulated
by redox potential, while it is postulated that the activityof
RsfB is controlled by phosphorylation [5].
An M . tuberculosis CDC1551 mutant lacking sigF was produced to investigate its role in virulence and stress response . Interestingly, the mutant strain reached stationary phase later than the wild-type [WT] parental strain and did not exhibit the typical lag phase after dilution of a dense culture into fresh medium . The mutanthad the same sensitivity as the WT parent strain to heat shock,cold shock, hypoxia, and long-term stationary-phase growth;however, it was more sensitive than the WT to rifampin . Also,when used to infect human monocytes, the mutant did not showany difference from the WT . However, it was attenuated for virulencein mice when death was used as a criterion [13].
The
F
regulon was studied by using DNA arrays in order to identifygenes
that require
F
for their expression [W . R . Bishai, personalcommunication], and a
consensus sequence was formulated thatclosely resembles the usfX
promoter previously shown to be transcribedby
F-RNAP
[5].
C,
AN ECF
FACTOR REQUIRED FOR MOUSE LETHALITY
C
was recently inactivated in M . tuberculosis [Bishai, personal
communication] . The resulting strain was more susceptible tohydrogen
peroxide and diamide stress but was not altered forsurvival in
activated mouse macrophages . However, it was significantlyattenuated
in time-to-death experiments in the mouse model.Functional genomic
studies with DNA arrays showed that at least38 genes are repressed
in the sigC mutant at different pointof the growth curve .
Those genes encode proteins involved ina broad range of cellular
processes like fatty acids biosynthesis,phospholipid and cell wall
biosynthesis, energy metabolism,and general stress response . A
C
consensus sequence has beenproposed from microarray data [Table
2] [Bishai, personal communication].
E,
AN ECF
FACTOR ESSENTIAL FOR VIRULENCE INVOLVED IN RESPONSE TO SURFACE STRESS
The gene encoding
E
is induced after exposure to various environmentalstresses, such as
heat shock and detergent-induced surface stress[41],
as well as during M . tuberculosis growth in human macrophages
[35] . Interestingly, Schnappinger et al . [58]
recently showedby functional genomics that a set of
-dependent
genes are inducedin the phagosomal environment . A mutant of M .
tuberculosis H37Rvlacking a functional sigE gene is more
sensitive than the WTparent strain to detergent, high temperature,
and oxidativestress . This mutant is attenuated for growth in
THP-1-derivedmacrophages and is more sensitive than the WT strain to
thekilling activity of activated murine macrophages [43] .
Moreover,the sigE mutant has reduced virulence both in BALB/C
and inSCID mice [R . Manganelli et al., submitted for publication].
DNA array experiments comparing the transcriptome of the sigE
mutant with that of the WT strain showed that 38 genes require
E
for their full expression during exponential growth, while13
putative transcriptional units containing 23 genes required
E
for their induction after exposure to a subinhibitory concentration
of SDS [43] . Nine of the 13 putative transcriptional units
werepreceded by a conserved ECF
factor-like promoter [Table 2],suggesting their
direct transcriptional dependence on
E .
Thegenes whose expression during exponential growth require
E
includegenes encoding proteins involved in translation,
transcriptionalcontrol, mycolic acid biosynthesis, electron
transport, andoxidative stress response . Interestingly, one of these
genesis sigB, whose transcription under unstressed conditions
isalmost totally due to
E .
Since sigB is the only gene of thisgroup to be preceded by an
ECF
factor-like promoter, this suggeststhat at least some of the other
37 genes downregulated in thesigE mutant are in the
B
regulon . Most of them are housekeepinggenes, supporting the
hypothesis that
B
and
A
have overlappingregulons . This question is currently being
investigated.
Genes requiring
E
for SDS-mediated induction encode heat shockproteins, proteins
involved in fatty acid degradation, transcriptionalregulators
[including
B],
and surface-exposed proteins withunknown function . The presence in
this group of fadE23 and fadE24is of particular
interest . They were previously found to beinduced after exposure to
isoniazid, and it was hypothesizedthat their protein products could
be involved in the degradationof the fatty acids accumulating on the
surface as a consequenceof the block of mycolic acid biosynthesis [69] .
The
E-dependent
induction of these genes [together with others encoding fatty
acid degradation enzymes] after exposure to a detergent supportsthe
hypothesis of their role [and that of
E]
in cell wall physiologyand structure.
The gene encoding
E
is followed by an operon including threegenes . The first, Rv1222,
encodes a
E-specific
anti-
factor[RseA] [Rodrigue et al., unpublished] . The second, htrA,
encodesa putative membrane serine protease; the third, tatB,
encodesa putative protein belonging to the Tween arginine
translocator[Tat] secretion system . The Tat secretion system
translocatesproteins showing at the N terminus a typical signal
sequencecontaining a couple of adjacent arginine residues [7] .
TatBwas suggested to be responsible for the association of the
proteinssecreted by the Tat system to the membrane [57].
In E . coli, the anti-
factor regulating
E
is a transmembraneprotein and it is degraded by a membrane-located
serine proteasein the presence of misfolded proteins in the
periplasmic space[54] . In M . tuberculosis,
RseA is predicted to be a solubleprotein . We recently found that it
has a putative Tat consensussequence at its N terminus . The fact
that rseA is in the sameoperon with tatB suggests that
their protein products couldinteract and that RseA could be secreted
or associated to themembrane through TatB . The presence in the same
operon of thegene encoding a membrane-located serine protease [HtrA]
suggeststhat HtrA, with its proteolytic activity, could represent
themolecular switch acting [directly or indirectly] on RseA
activity.The interactions among RseA, HtrA, and TatB are currently
beinginvestigated to better understand the mechanism of
posttranslationalregulation of
E.
H,
AN ECF
FACTOR INVOLVED IN RESPONSE TO HEAT SHOCK AND OXIDATIVE STRESS
H
is very similar to the ECF
factor
R
of S . coelicolor . Thelatter responds to intracellular
formation of disulfide bondsdue to oxidation of cysteine thiol
groups [49].
R
activity isregulated at the posttranslational level by a
cysteine-containinganti-
factor [RsrA] whose gene is adjacent to sigR . In a reducing
environment, RsrA binds
R,
keeping it inactive; however, inoxidizing environments, disulfide
bonds can form between RsrAcysteine residues and, as a consequence,
R
is released in itsactive form from the
R-RsrA
complex [48] . Among the genes recognizedby the
R-RNAP
are sigR and the trx operon, which encodes thioredoxin
and thioredoxin reductase, two proteins involved in disulfidebond
reduction . Usually, cells have a second pathway by whichto reduce
intracellular disulfide bonds, based on glutathione.Actinomycetes
are an exception, as they do not synthesize glutathionebut use a
different compound, mycothiol, for similar functions[47] .
A sigR mutant of S . coelicolor produces less mycothiol
than the WT parental strain, even if it is not known if thisis due
to the direct control of mycothiol biosynthetic genesby
R-RNAP
[50].
The M . tuberculosis sigH gene is induced after heat shock, after
treatment with the thiol-specific oxidizing agent diamide [42,
55], and during macrophage infection [35] .
Similar to sigR inS . coelicolor, the M .
tuberculosis sigH gene is followed bya gene encoding an anti-
factor whose activity is regulatedby redox potential [Rodrigue et
al., unpublished] . The geneencoding
H
was inactivated in three different laboratories [40,
42, 55] . The mutants are more
sensitive than the WT to hightemperature and to diamide exposure .
However, they are not restrictedfor growth in THP-1-derived
macrophages and were as sensitiveas the WT parental strain to the
killing activity of activatedmurine macrophages [42] .
Interestingly, the sigH mutant hasa very subtle phenotype in
a mouse model of infection: it isable to reach the same bacterial
load as the WT parent strainin mouse organs [40,
42], but there are differences in lung
histopathology, including fewer granulomas and a generally decreased
pulmonary inflammatory response in mice infected with the sigH
mutant [40].
DNA array experiments comparing the transcriptome of the sigH
mutant with that of the WT parent strain do not show any gene
requiring
H
for its expression during exponential growth, while26 putative
transcriptional units including 39 genes require
H
for their induction after exposure to a subinhibitory concentration
of diamide [42] . Sixteen of the 26 putative transcriptional
units were preceded by a conserved ECF
factor-like promoter,suggesting their direct transcriptional
dependence on
H,
while4 were preceded by a potential consensus sequence for an
unknownregulatory protein . The genes under
H
control included someencoding transcriptional regulators [
B,
E,
and
H];
enzymes involvedin thiol metabolism, such as thioredoxin,
thioredoxin reductase,and a protein of unknown function with a
glutaredoxin activesite; and enzymes involved in cysteine and
molybdopterin biosynthesis[42] . Work from two
other laboratories [40, 55] also derived
a similar consensus sequence for genes requiring
H
for theirexpression [Table 2].
OTHER ECF
FACTORS Little information is available about the other seven ECF
factorsencoded by the M . tuberculosis genome . sigD is
induced followingtotal nutrient starvation [8] and
in the M . tuberculosis Relmutant [17] . The
Rel protein has been well studied in E . coliand is known to
be a key enzyme in the stringent response, atransition process
believed to shut down active metabolism.sigJ is induced in
stationary-phase cultures [38] . Of particular
interest is sigL . Its gene product,
L,
is the closest M . tuberculosishomolog of S . coelicolor
E
This protein in S . coelicolor controlscell wall structure,
and its activity is posttranslationallyregulated by a two-component
system encoded by an operon immediatelydownstream of its structural
gene . In M . tuberculosis, however,this gene is followed by a
gene encoding a transmembrane anti-
factor, which specifically binds to and reversibly inactivates
L
[Rodrigue, unpublished data], suggesting its involvement withsurface
processes.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
factors, with their plethora of anti-
factors and anti-anti-
factors, are among the major and more complex players in the
regulation of gene expression in bacteria . In the last few years,
after the publication of the M . tuberculosis genome, the 13
factors of M . tuberculosis have become an important subjectof
investigation . Mutations in six of the
factor genes wereeither made [sigB, -C, -E, -F,
and -H] or identified [sigA],and a role in virulence
for five of them [all except sigB] wasdemonstrated.
The regulons of four of these
factors,
C,
E,
F,
and
H,
werecharacterized by DNA array technology, and this analysis showed
that many genes were represented only in one regulon . However,
there was some overlap, which is typical in ECF
factor regulons.As an example of this overlap, some of the sig
genes are inthe regulon of other
factors: sigE induction is
H
dependentfollowing oxidative stress but not after surface stress or
heatshock [42, 55]; sigB
expression, however, is
E
dependent understandard [unstressed] growth conditions.
E
is also requiredfor sigB induction after surface stress [43],
but sigB inductionafter oxidative stress and heat shock is
dependent on
H
[42,55] [Fig . 1] .
Our observations, which indicate that sigB expressionis
controlled by RNAPs containing different
factors, suggestan important role for
B
in M . tuberculosis physiology and perhapsvirulence .
Otherwise, why would this bacterium go through somuch trouble to
make sure that this protein is available tocontrol transcription in
different environments? However, wehave not seen any diminution of
pathogenicity in sigB mutants,as yet . It is possible that
there is a subtle change in virulencethat has been missed so far,
and these studies are currentlybeing pursued.
|
The whole question of posttranslational regulation by anti-and
anti-anti-
factors makes the matter even more complicated.The resulting picture
is that of a very intricate regulatorynetwork that will become even
more complex as other
factorsand other transcriptional regulators are characterized with
their regulons . We predict that the understanding of global
gene regulation in M . tuberculosis will help us to understand
its physiology and virulence mechanisms and will help to designnew
strategies to fight tuberculosis.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Our work cited in this article was supported by grants fromthe
Istituto Superiore di Sanità [Progetto NazionaleAIDS 50D.20], from
the Università di Padova [Assegnidi ricerca CPDR027593], from MIUR
[PRIN 2001 2001053855 andPRIN 2002 2002067349] [awarded to R.M.],
from the NSERC [awardedto L.G.], and from the NIH [grants AI-44856
and HL-68513] [awardedto I.S.].
We thank W . R . Bishai for sharing unpublished data and Patricia Fontan, Ryzsard Brzezinski, and Pierre-Étienne Jacquesfor valuable discussions . The literature survey for this articlewas completed in September 2003.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author . Mailing address: TB Center, The Public
Health Research Institute at the International Center for Public Health, 225
Warren St., Newark, NJ 07103-3535 . Phone: [973] 854-3260 . Fax: [973] 854-3261 .
E-mail: smitty@phri.org .
| REFERENCES |
|---|