|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2004, p . 4326-4337, Vol . 186, No . 13 P Pilus Assembly Motif Necessary for Activation of the CpxRA Pathway by PapE in Escherichia coliYvonne M . Lee,1 Patricia A . DiGiuseppe,2 Thomas J . Silhavy,2 and Scott J . Hultgren1* Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St . Louis, Missouri 63110,1 Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 085442 Received 16 December 2003/ Accepted 29 March 2004
P pili consist of a thin tip fibrillum connected to a thicker cylindrical rod (30) (Fig . 1A) . Their assembly requires the coordination of at least 11 structural and regulatory gene products encoded within the pap gene cluster (20, 36) . The tip fibrillum is flexible and consists mainly of PapE subunits interacting linearly with each other to form an open helical configuration, approximately 2 to 3 nm in diameter (30) . The PapG adhesin localizes to the distal tip of the fibrillum (30, 34) and is believed to be joined to the rest of the structure through the adaptor protein PapF (27) . The more rigid pilus rod contains PapA subunits arranged to form a right-handed helical cylinder (2) with 3.28 subunits per turn (6, 17) . The tip fibrillum portion of the pilus is connected to the rod via the PapK adaptor (27) . PapH is thought to anchor the entire composite pilus structure to the bacterial envelope (1) .
The three-dimensional structures of PapD-PapK and PapD-PapE chaperone-subunit complexes showed that pilus subunits have an incomplete immunoglobulin-like (Ig-like) fold in that they are missing a C-terminal seventh beta strand (50, 51) . The absence of this C-terminal beta strand results in exposure of a large hydrophobic groove in the subunits (50, 51) . Pilus subunits also contain an amino-terminal (N-terminal) extension preceding the first A1 beta strand (50, 51) . The N-terminal extensions of P pilus subunits vary in length but all contain a conserved motif of alternating hydrophobic residues (50, 51, 56) . All pilus subunits are expected to have the same topology (8, 50, 51, 56) . Chaperones consist of two complete Ig-like domains oriented such that they form an overall boomerang-like conformation (8, 18, 23-25, 32, 50) . The chaperone functions by donating its G1 beta strand to complete the Ig-like fold of the subunit by inserting parallel to the F beta strand of the pilin in a process called donor strand complementation (8, 50) . Pilus assembly occurs via donor strand exchange, in which occupation of a pilin subunit groove by the chaperone is exchanged for an N-terminal extension from an incoming preassembled subunit (3, 8, 50, 51) . In contrast to donor strand complementation, the N-terminal extension of a subunit inserts antiparallel to the C-terminal F beta strand of its neighboring subunit, creating a stable canonical Ig-like fold (3, 8, 50, 51) . The basis by which specificity in the donor strand exchange process defines the order of subunit incorporation into a pilus fiber has not been demonstrated . In the absence of the chaperone, P pilus subunits are diverted
"OFF-pathway," causing them to participate in nonproductive
interactions (26, 28) . During normal pilus
assembly, a portion of pilus subunits fail to interact with the
chaperone and are consequently not incorporated into a growing pilus
(26, 28) . They, too, are driven
OFF-pathway (26, 28) . Two of these
subunits have been shown to activate partially overlapping stress
responses: the PapG adhesin activates the CpxRA and BaeSR
two-component signal transduction pathways, as well as the alternate
sigma factor
The CpxRA two-component signaling pathway consists of the sensor histidine kinase CpxA in the inner membrane and the response regulator CpxR in the cytoplasm (9, 10, 12, 46, 47) . CpxA has been shown to have three activities: autokinase, CpxR kinase, and CpxR phosphatase (48) . The phosphorylation of CpxR, which is thought to occur in response to stress (47), increases its binding affinity for specific recognition motifs upstream of target genes in vitro (43, 47, 48) . Negative auto-regulation of the pathway is accomplished through CpxP (45, 46, 48) . CpxP is a periplasmic protein, itself regulated by Cpx (11, 45, 46), that leads to down-regulation of the system in a CpxA-dependent manner (45, 46) . Stresses that activate the pathway inactivate CpxP (14) . The pathway responds to diverse stresses, including overproduction of the lipoprotein NlpE (55), alkaline pH (42), changes in lipid composition in the inner membrane (38), and certain OFF-pathway pilus subunits (28) . It is currently thought that these stresses may ultimately lead to misfolded proteins in the cell envelope, which are then sensed by the Cpx pathway (14); however, the precise details of Cpx activation remain unclear . In this study, we found that PapE was the only nonadhesin P pilus subunit capable of activating the Cpx pathway . Surprisingly, even though PapA is the most abundantly expressed subunit and is highly aggregative, it did not induce Cpx . We therefore investigated the structural basis by which PapE specifically activates Cpx . We constructed a series of N-terminal deleted, donor strand complemented, and N-terminal swapped pilin subunits and characterized their abilities to participate in subunit-subunit interactions and Cpx activation . We discovered that deletion of the N-terminal extension from PapE abolished its ability to induce Cpx . We also demonstrated that the N-terminal extension influences the proper association between subunits in the pilus, conferring specificity in subunit-subunit interactions consistent with the donor strand exchange hypothesis . In conclusion, subunit aggregation and stability in the periplasm did not correlate with Cpx induction . Instead, induction was related to structural features of PapE .
pYML33 contains DscEPapE under the control of Ptac . DscEPapE was amplified by PCR from pPAP5 (36) while adding a donor strand to the 3' end of the gene as well as EcoRI and BamHI sites on the 5' and 3' ends, respectively . The oligonucleotides (primers are labeled a to y in this section) used in this process were a (5'-ACAGTGGAATTCGTGATGAAAAAGATAAGAGGTTTGTGTC-3') and b (5'-CGCGGATCCTTAGGCAGGAATAATCAGTTTTCCTCTG AAGGTCAGATTATCAACTTGTTTGTTA TCCGAATATGATGCAACCA GCGTTGCTGTTGCAGAG-3') . pYML34 contains DscKPapE and was amplified in the same manner, with oligonucleotides a (from above) and c (5'-CGCGGATCCTTAGGGTCTGTCAAGCAGATTA CCCCTGAATGCCACAT CTGATTGTTTGTTATCCGAATATGATGCAACCAGCGTT GCTGTTGCAGAGAA-3') . pYML50 contains wild-type papA amplified from pPAP5 without any modification except to add EcoRI and BamHI restriction enzyme sites to the 5' and 3' ends of the gene, respectively . The oligonucleotides used in this procedure were d (5'-CCGGAATTCTGCCAGATATCTCTGGTG-3') and e (5'-CGCGGATCCGATAAATACCCTGAG-3') . Other mutagenesis was performed by using a two-step PCR technique described previously (39) . The plasmid pYML55, containing NtsEPapF, was constructed by using the following oligonucleotides (f through i) to (i) replace the DNA sequence corresponding to the 14-amino-acid N-terminal extension of PapF with the DNA sequence corresponding to the 14-amino-acid N-terminal extension of PapE and (ii) introduce EcoRI and BamHI sites to the 5' and 3' ends of the mutant gene, respectively: f, 5'-CCGGAATTCTTTCTGTACCGCTCTCCG-3'; g, 5'-CGCGGATCCCACTTCCGTAATTACAGT-3'; h, 5'-TCGGTCGCTGTACTGGCTGTTGATAATCTGACCTT CAGAGGAAAACTGATTATTCCTGCCTGCACCATTAATAACGGG-3'; i, 5'-CCCGTTATTAATGGTGCAGGCAGGAATAATCAGTTT TCCTCTGAAGGTCAGATTATCAACAGCCAGTACAGCGACCGA-3' . pYML56, to express the mutant NtsFPapE, was constructed in the same way as pYML55 by using the following oligonucleotides: j, 5'-CCGGAATTCATGAAAAAGATAAGAGGT-3'; k, 5'-CGCGGATCCGGAGAGCGGTACAGA-3'; l, 5'-ATGTCTCAGCATGTACATGCAGATGTGCAGATTAACA TCAGGGGGAATGTTTATATCCCCCCATGTACTGTAAGCAACACAACTG-3'; m, 5'-CAGTTGTGTTGCTTACAGTACATGGGGGGAT ATAAACATTCCCCCTGATGTTAATCTGCACATCTGCATGTACATGCTGAGACAT-3' . To construct the plasmid pYML64, which contains NtdPapF, oligonucleotides f and g, described above, were used in addition to the following primers to delete the DNA sequence encoding residues 2 to 12 of the N-terminal extension of PapF and to introduce EcoRI and BamHI sites to the 5' and 3' ends of the mutant gene, respectively: n, 5'-TCGGTCGCTGTACTGGCTGATCCCCCATGCACCATTAATAAC-3'; o, 5'-GTTATTAATGGTGCATGGGGGATCAGCCAGTACAGCGACCGA-3' . The plasmid pYML75, which contains NtsEPapK, was made similarly to pYML55 and pYML56, with the following oligonucleotides, to replace the 13-amino-acid N-terminal extension of PapK with the 14-amino-acid N-terminal extension of PapE: p, 5'-CCGGAATTCGGGAATGTGATGATAAAAAGCACAGGC-3'; q, 5'-CGCGGATCCCTGAAATATCCTGTACAA-3'; r, 5'-CTGCCGGACAGGCAATAGCCGTTGATAATCTGACCTTCA GAGGAAAACTGATTATTCCTGCCTGCCATGTGTCCGGTGAC-3'; s, 5'-GTCACCGGACACATGGCAGGCAGGAATAATCAGTTTTCC TCTGAAGGTCAGATTATCAACGGCTATTGCCTGTCCGGCAG-3' . The plasmid pYML80, containing NtsEPapA, was constructed by using oligonucleotides d and e from above with the following oligonucleotides: t, 5'-GTGGTGTCTTTTGGTGTAAATAATGCTGTTGATAATCTGACCTTCAGA GGAAAACTGATTATTCCTGCCTGCAGCATTTCTCAGAAATCAGCTG-3'; u, 5'-CAGCTGATTTCTGAGAAATGCTGCAGGCAGGAATAAT CAGTTTTCCTCTGAAGGTCAGATTATCAACAGCATTATTTACACCAAAAGACACCAC-3' . The plasmid pYML83, containing NtsKPapE, was also made similarly to the others, by using primers j and k from above together with the following oligonucleotides: v, 5'-ATGTCTCAGCATGTACATGCATCAGATGTGGCATTCAG GGGTAATCTGCTTGACAGACCCTGTACTGTAAGCAACACAACTG-3'; w, 5'-CAGTTGTGTTGCTTACAGTACAGGGTCTGTCAAGCAGAT TACCCCTGAATGCCACATCTGATGCATGTACATGCTGAGACAT-3' . The plasmid pYML87, containing NtsAPapE, was made with primers j and k from above and the following primers: x, 5'-TCTCAGCATGTACATGCAGCTCCAACTATTCCACAGGGG CAGGGTAAAGTAACTTTTAACGGAACTGTTGTTGATGCTCC ATGTACTGTAAGCAACACAA-3'; y, 5'-TTGTGTTGCTTACAGTACATGGAGCATCAACAACAGTTCCG TTAAAAGTTACTTTACCCTGCCCCTGTGGA ATAGTTGGAGCTGCATGTACATGCTGAGA-3' . Amplified PCR inserts were cloned using a TOPO-TA kit (Invitrogen), and mutations were confirmed by sequencing . The fragments were then digested with EcoRI and BamHI and subcloned into pMMB66 . The following plasmids have been previously described elsewhere . The plasmid pPAP5 encodes the entire wild-type pap operon under control of the native promoter (36) . pHJ13 contains wild-type papE under the control of the Ptac promoter in pMMB66 (28) . pWT contains papD under the control of a Para promoter (23) . ß-Galactosidase assays. Saturated bacterial cultures were
diluted 1:100 in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and grown in the presence
of appropriate antibiotics to mid-logarithmic phase (optical density
at 600 nm,
To compare Cpx activation and pilus subunit stability in the periplasm, cells were grown and induced as described above . At 180 min postinduction (same time point reported in assays above), ß-galactosidase assays were performed as described, and then remaining cells were harvested and periplasms were isolated as described below . Periplasmic extract preparations. Bacterial cells grown to saturation in 10 ml of LB broth supplemented with 0.8% glucose and appropriate antibiotics were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 10 ml of fresh LB broth twice . Cells were diluted 1:40 in LB broth and grown in the presence of appropriate antibiotics . When preparing periplasms from strains carrying a plasmid to produce a pilus subunit or a mutant subunit from a Ptac promoter, IPTG was added to 0.1 mM to cells grown to logarithmic phase . In strains containing pWT, PapD was induced with arabinose to 0.1% . Growth was then allowed to continue for 90 min before the preparation of periplasmic extracts . Periplasms were isolated by the sucrose-lysozyme method as described previously (15) . Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer was added to each extract, and samples were incubated for 5 to 10 min at 95°C . Periplasmic extracts were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) followed by immunoblotting with rabbit antisera raised against Pap pilus tip fibrillae (reactive against PapG, PapF, PapE, and PapK) as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) as the secondary antibody . Self-association assays. Periplasmic extracts were prepared as described above and treated with SDS sample buffer . Each sample was incubated for 5 to 10 min at either 95 or 22°C (room temperature) . Samples were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie blue, as well as by Western blotting . Immunoblotting was done by using Pap pilus tip antiserum as described above .
We created a series of "N-terminal deleted" (Ntd), "donor strand complemented" (Dsc), and "N-terminal swapped" (Nts) subunits (Fig. 1C) . In N-terminal deleted subunits, NtdPapE (previously described) (51) and NtdPapF, residues 2 through 12 at the amino termini of the mature pilus subunits were deleted, resulting in proteins that lacked the amino-terminal extension, but retained their signal sequences and incomplete Ig-like folds (Fig. 1C) . Donor strand complemented proteins DscEPapE and DscKPapE were engineered as previously described for other pilus subunits (3) . In a donor strand complemented subunit, fusion of a seventh beta strand to the C terminus completes its Ig-like fold, resulting in a subunit that is stable in the absence of the chaperone (3, 4) . DscEPapE was created by adding the first 14 amino acids (VDNLTFRGKLIIPA) of PapE to the C-terminal end of PapE, following a short DNKQ linker loop . DscKPapE was constructed in the same way, with the first 13 amino acids (SDVAFRGNLLDRP) of PapK . We also created N-terminal swapped subunits, exchanging the complete N-terminal extension of one subunit with that of another (Fig . 1C) . The first 14 amino acids of PapE were removed from the Ig-like domain of PapE and replaced with the first 14 residues (DVQINIRGNVYIPP) of PapF to produce NtsFPapE . In a similar manner, the subunits NtsKPapE and NtsAPapE were likewise generated . The N-terminal extensions of PapF, PapK, and PapA were also replaced with the N-terminal extension of PapE, making NtsEPapF, NtsEPapK, and NtsEPapA, respectively . These N-terminal swapped subunits allow examination of the N-terminal extension as a whole unit, without disrupting the Ig-like domain of the pilus subunit . The chaperone PapD completes the fold of a subunit by providing the missing seventh beta strand in the Ig-like domain of the subunit; in the absence of this interaction, pilin subunits are unstable (3, 50) . The stability of each of the mutants in the periplasm was therefore examined when coexpressed with the chaperone in the E . coli laboratory strain MC4100, which lacks the pap operon . All wild-type and N-terminal deleted and N-terminal swapped subunits were stable in the periplasm when coexpressed with the chaperone (data not shown) . Donor strand complemented subunits were stable in the periplasm with or without coexpression of the chaperone (data not shown) . The Cpx pathway discriminates between pilus subunits. Jones
et al . discovered that pilus subunits that do not form complexes with
the chaperone go OFF-pathway and may activate the Cpx pathway (28) .
Both PapG and PapE were shown to effectively induce the Cpx pathway
when expressed in the absence of the chaperone (28) .
To understand the molecular basis for the Cpx response to OFF-pathway
subunits, the ability of each of the other structural pilus subunits
to activate the Cpx pathway in the absence of the chaperone PapD was
tested . Cpx induction was measured by using ß-galactosidase assays
with the E . coli strain TR50, in which a cpxP'-lacZ+
promoter fusion was integrated into the chromosome of MC4100 at the
N-terminal extension is required for Cpx activation through PapE. Because PapE is the only nonadhesin pilus subunit capable of activating the Cpx pathway, we reasoned that PapE may be presenting a specific activating signal inherent in its structure to the Cpx pathway in the absence of PapD, either during or after its folding . The three-dimensional X-ray crystallographic structure of PapE has been previously solved and revealed that it consists of an N-terminal extension and an incomplete Ig-like fold (51) . To investigate the contribution of each of these domains to the ability of PapE to activate the Cpx pathway, we compared the ability of wild-type PapE and NtdPapE to activate the Cpx pathway by analyzing the expression of cpxP'-lacZ+ in strains producing either wild-type PapE or NtdPapE in the absence of the PapD chaperone (Fig . 3A) . NtdPapE consists of the incomplete Ig-like pilin domain, containing the hydrophobic groove due to the missing C-terminal beta strand, but has its N-terminal extension removed (51) . Wild-type PapE subunits retain both the incomplete Ig-like fold and the N-terminal extension . As shown in Fig . 3A, PapE stimulated cpxP'-lacZ+ transcription approximately sixfold over the vector control (compare first and second bars) . In contrast, NtdPapE expression resulted in little or no activation of the Cpx pathway over the vector baseline (Fig . 3A, compare first and third bars) . These results showed that deletion of the N-terminal extension of PapE abolished its ability to activate the Cpx pathway .
The studies described above demonstrated that, when expressed
alone, the PapE Ig-like domain (NtdPapE) is incapable of activating
the Cpx pathway; however, the N-terminal extension of PapE is not
sufficient for recognition of PapE by the Cpx pathway . We
hypothesized that the Ig-like fold of PapE may also contain
information necessary for stimulation of the Cpx pathway when
expressed in the context of its N-terminal extension . To investigate
whether the wild-type N-terminal extension of PapE was specific for
creating the signal or whether other N-terminal extensions could
substitute for the wild-type PapE sequence when connected to the PapE
Ig-like fold, levels of cpxP'-lacZ+ transcription
following expression of NtsFPapE, NtsKPapE, and NtsAPapE
were measured (Fig . 3C) . All of these subunits
contain an intact PapE incomplete Ig-like domain, but each carries a
different N-terminal extension . All NtsNPapE subunits were
able to activate the Cpx pathway in the absence of the PapD chaperone
(Fig . 3C), though to significantly lower extents
than wild-type PapE . NtsFPapE produced an
Characterization of N-terminal deleted and N-terminal swapped subunits in self-association. PapE differs from the other tip fibrillum pilus subunits, PapG, PapF, and PapK, in that it is able to self-associate into a homopolymeric fiber (51, 57) . The ability of the N-terminal extension of PapE to complete the Ig-like fold of a neighboring PapE protein is thought to explain the ability of PapE to assemble into a PapE homopolymer . In accordance with this hypothesis, deletion of the N-terminal extension abolishes the self-associative properties of PapE (51) . Noting that PapE, but not NtdPapE, activates Cpx (Fig . 3A), and that PapE, but not NtdPapE, forms homopolymers (see below and reference 51), the ability of various N-terminal deleted and N-terminal swapped subunits to form multimeric species was tested to determine whether there exists a correlation between self-association and Cpx recognition that may be mediated by the N-terminal extension . PapE-PapE interactions can be visualized in a simple, previously
described assay based on the stability of subunit-subunit interactions
at different temperatures (51, 57) .
Interactions between pilus subunits are dissociated in SDS ( Periplasmic extracts of cells coproducing PapD and wild-type PapE, NtdPapE, or NtsFPapE were characterized for self-association between subunits (Fig . 4A), using the multimerization assay described above . Though similar interactions are presumably initiated in the absence of the chaperone, coexpression with PapD was necessary in these assays to visualize any potential interactions, since pilus subunits are quickly proteolytically degraded in the absence of the chaperone . Figure 4A shows immunoblots of periplasmic extracts, with antiserum raised against P pilus tip fibrillae . Each blot can be divided into pairs of lanes (i.e., lanes 1 and 2 and lanes 3 and 4, etc.) that contain samples from the same periplasmic extracts . Lanes in each pair therefore differ only in the temperature (95 versus 22°C) at which the periplasms were incubated prior to analysis . Boiled (95°C) periplasmic extracts from cells coexpressing PapD and PapE revealed a monomeric population of PapE subunits migrating at about 16.5 kDa (Fig . 4A, lane 1), whereas a characteristic PapE multimeric ladder (PapE1, PapE2, and PapEn, etc.) was observed if the same periplasmic extracts were not boiled but instead incubated at 22°C prior to analysis (Fig . 4A, lane 2) . The antibody preparation used in these studies was raised against polymerized Pap tips and therefore reacted more strongly with subunit oligomers than monomers . Consequently, quantitative inferences could not be made by comparing staining intensities . However, this assay provides a qualitative assessment of differences in subunit-subunit interactions as described previously (51, 57), and these differences are striking, as shown in Fig . 4A, for example, in which the presence of higher-order multimeric species in lane 2 but not in lane 1 is plain . Periplasms from strains coexpressing PapD and NtdPapE were thus analyzed similarly . After either 95 or 22°C incubation, samples containing PapD and NtdPapE did not exhibit any multimeric complexes (Fig . 4A, lanes 3 and 4, respectively), consistent with in vitro results shown previously (51) . NtsFPapE, which has the N-terminal extension of PapF fused onto the Ig-like PapE pilin, migrated predominantly as a monomer under both 95 and 22°C conditions (Fig . 4A, lanes 5 and 6) . Thus, NtsFPapE behaved similarly to NtdPapE in self-associative properties; however, unlike NtdPapE, NtsFPapE was able to induce a low level of Cpx activation (Fig . 3C) . These results suggest that the ability of PapE to activate Cpx cannot be linked with its ability to form homopolymers . Furthermore, these results argue that the N-terminal extension of PapF does not fit into the groove of PapE, in accordance with the observed order of the subunits in the pilus fiber (Fig . 1A), and argues that the N-terminal extension not only mediates subunit-subunit interactions between PapE subunits but also determines the specificity of those interactions .
An alternative explanation for the ability of NtsEPapF to multimerize is that the PapE N-terminal extension may contain unique information that directs nonspecific self-association . If this were true, then swapping the N-terminal extension of any of the subunits with that of PapE should drive them towards multimerization . Accordingly, we placed the N-terminal extension of PapE onto the Ig-like fold of PapA and PapK and tested each subunit's ability to form multimers . Neither NtsEPapA nor NtsEPapK was able to self-associate, even though both carried the PapE N-terminal extension (data not shown) . Together, these results all demonstrate that similar to Cpx activation, PapE-PapE and PapE-PapF subunit-subunit interactions require the N-terminal extension of PapE . Furthermore, these results show that the N-terminal extension of PapE determines the binding specificity in the PapE homopolymer and in the binding to PapF, through the proper pairing of N-terminal extension and neighboring Ig-like domain . Stable DscPapE subunits activate Cpx. As shown above, no
simple correlation could be formed between the ability of PapE to
multimerize and its ability to activate the Cpx pathway . Thus, the
roles of protein stability and aggregation in Cpx stimulation were
next examined (Fig . 5A) . DscEPapE and
DscKPapE are stable in the periplasm without the chaperone due
to the addition of either the N-terminal extension of PapE or
PapK to the C terminus of PapE, which completes its Ig-like fold . In
related experiments with other Dsc subunits, added donor strands also
blocked interactions with other subunits by keeping the interactive
groove occupied (4) . To determine whether the added
donor strands blocked interactions in DscPapE, these subunits were
characterized in the multimerization assay (Fig . 5A) .
Periplasms isolated from strains carrying an empty pMMB66 vector or
coexpressing wild-type PapE with PapD were also examined as controls .
DscEPapE was observed as a monomeric or dimeric species
(Fig . 5A, lanes 3 and 4) . The ability of an added
donor strand to participate in a domain swap with a neighboring
subunit may explain the presence of the dimer, whereas the monomer is
thought to be due to the added donor strand completing its Ig-like
fold . Monomeric DscEPapE exhibited a shift in apparent
molecular mass when not boiled (Fig . 5A, lane 4), and while
the cause of this shift is unknown, the band migrates at a molecular
mass that is most consistent with it being a monomer, since the
dimer was detected at a molecular mass of
X-ray crystallography data from the PapD-PapK chaperone-subunit complex revealed that an 8-residue stretch at the amino terminus of PapK was disordered in the structure (50) . These residues were part of an N-terminal extension present in all nonadhesin P pilus structural subunits (3, 50, 51, 56) . Every pilin subunit in a pilus fiber donates its N-terminal extension to complete the Ig-like fold of its neighbor (Fig . 1A) (3, 51) . These interactions were shown in the X-ray crystal structure of the complex of PapE bound to the N-terminal extension of PapK to be critical in the topological transition of the subunits into their final architecture (51) . Interestingly, the G1 beta strand of the chaperone allows it to interact with all of the P pilus subunits via donor strand complementation (3, 8, 50) . In contrast, alignment of the N-terminal extensions of the various structural pilus subunits revealed that each N-terminal extension is unique and varies in length (Fig . 1B) . These differences among the N-terminal extensions may in part determine subunit-subunit specificity . We found that changing the N-terminal extension of PapE to that of PapF renders NtsFPapE incapable of self-association, whereas wild-type PapE forms multimers . We reasoned that the inability of NtsFPapE to assemble into multimers resulted from the mispairing of the N-terminal extension of PapF with the hydrophobic groove of PapE . Consistent with this hypothesis, we were able to convert PapF into a self-associating protein simply by providing it with the PapE N-terminal extension . Multimer formation was allowed in this case because the N-terminal extension of PapE is able to complete the Ig-like fold of PapF . In contrast, swapping the N-terminal extension of PapA for that of PapE locked PapA in a monomeric state, presumably by blocking any intermolecular subunit interactions, since the incomplete Ig-like fold of PapA cannot accommodate the N-terminal extension of PapE . In support of these conclusions was the observation that NtsEPapK also remained monomeric . These studies thus provide direct evidence that specificities of PapE-PapE and PapE-PapF interactions are the consequences of the correct pairing of the N-terminal extension and hydrophobic groove . Furthermore, in previous studies, the X-ray crystal structure of PapD-PapK showed that the Ig-like fold of PapK, like that of PapE, is also completed by the addition of a beta strand from another protein, such as a chaperone (51) . Therefore, the specificity of the interactions between other structural subunits (PapG, PapK, and PapA) is likely dictated by a correct pairing of N-terminal extension to hydrophobic groove in a similar fashion to those demonstrated in these studies by PapE-PapE and PapE-PapF interactions . We also discovered that the N-terminal extension influences the ability of PapE to activate the Cpx two-component signal transduction pathway . The Cpx pathway responds to a wide array of extracytoplasmic stresses; however, despite its varied repertoire, Cpx is still able to discriminate between similar P pilus subunits, which consist of the same overall topology . Unlike PapG and PapE, we demonstrated in this study that expression of any of the other structural subunits, PapF, PapK, and PapA, in the absence of PapD did not activate the Cpx pathway . The differential stimulation of the Cpx pathway observed in P pilus biogenesis argues that Cpx activation is a highly specific and targeted response . Consistent with this observed specificity in Cpx activation was the finding that Cpx induction by pilin subunits could not be solely attributed to general protein processes, such as degradation or stability, subunit-subunit interactions, or even levels of protein in the periplasmic compartment . DscPapE and Ntd-DscPapE subunits induced Cpx even though they are stable proteins in the absence of the chaperone . Subunit-subunit interactions, likewise, were not essential to Cpx activation . PapE and PapA are both self-associating subunits; however, these two proteins have very different N-terminal extensions and very different Cpx activation profiles . While PapE is a strong inducer of Cpx, PapA is not . Furthermore, PapF was converted into a self-associating protein by the swapping of its N-terminal extension with that of PapE, yet it was incapable of Cpx stimulation . NtsEPapK neither self-associated nor induced Cpx . Thus, the aggregative properties of the pilins could not be correlated to Cpx activation . Finally, PapA was the most abundant subunit detectable in the periplasm in the absence of PapD, but as discussed above, it did not activate Cpx, showing that protein level did not correspond to Cpx induction or to the strength of the resultant activation . Therefore, aggregation, stability, and rate of degradation were not the most important factors in Cpx activation . We discovered instead that simple removal of the N-terminal extension from PapE renders the resultant NtdPapE subunit incapable of Cpx activation . These results suggest that structural characteristics of the PapE pilin subunit, requiring the N-terminal extension, are responsible for its ability to activate Cpx . We showed that N-terminal extension was necessary but not sufficient to promote Cpx activation by PapE . In support of this hypothesis, neither NtsEPapF nor NtsEPapK activated Cpx, even though both carried the PapE N-terminal extension . Providing the N-terminal extension of PapE to the Ig-like domain of PapA enabled it to activate the Cpx pathway; however, removal of the N-terminal extension of PapA (NtdPapA) also converted PapA into a Cpx inducer . This gain of ability to activate Cpx appeared unique to PapA, as neither NtdPapF (data not shown) nor NtdPapE stimulated the Cpx pathway . Thus, Cpx induction by NtsEPapA may result from the removal of the PapA N-terminal extension and not from the addition of the PapE N-terminal extension . Thus, while the N-terminal extension of PapE may be necessary, these results demonstrate that it is not sufficient for Cpx activation . Accordingly, we found that the Ig-like domain of PapE was vital for Cpx activation, but it could only stimulate Cpx induction when presented in conjunction with an N-terminal extension . The N-terminal extension of PapE was the most efficient in enabling the Ig-like domain to activate the Cpx pathway; however, PapE containing any N-terminal extension swapped onto its Ig-like domain (NtsFPapE, NtsKPapE, and NtsAPapE) was able to activate the Cpx pathway, although to significantly lower levels than wild-type PapE . Likewise, removal of the N-terminal extension on the amino-terminal side of DscEPapE and DscKPapE subunits (creating Ntd-DscEPapE and Ntd-DscKPapE, respectively) did not severely affect the ability of the DscPapE subunits to stimulate Cpx, presumably because an N-terminal extension was still present on the carboxyl terminus . Thus, these results suggest that the Ig-like fold of PapE contributes to the Cpx-activating signal; however, an N-terminal extension is required, whether at the amino terminus or carboxyl terminus, to assist in the presentation of the OFF-pathway PapE subunit to the Cpx pathway . It is therefore possible that the N-terminal extension may play an as of yet unforeseen role in influencing the overall conformation and structure of the protein in the absence of the chaperone . Cpx activation by PapG or PapE is abolished when each is coproduced with the chaperone PapD in the periplasm (28) . The chaperone forms a stable complex with PapE via donor strand complementation, thus capping interactive surfaces on the pilin domain (51) . Donor strand complementation mediated by the chaperone facilitates the folding of the subunit (3, 50, 51) . Thus, the folding pathway incurred by PapE in the absence of PapD may result in an intermediate specific for Cpx activation, and the presence of the N-terminal extension may facilitate the production of this specific signal . Therefore, in the absence of the chaperone, we suspect that both the N-terminal extension and the pilin domain influence the ability of PapE to generate a signal for the Cpx pathway, possibly via a folding intermediate . The recent three-dimensional structures of PapE in complex with PapD and in complex with a PapK N-terminal extension offered glimpses into the PapE folding pathway, demonstrating striking differences in PapE subunit structure when complexed with the different molecules (51) . PapE must participate in interactions with other subunits to attain its final architecture in the pilus fiber (51); however, the molecular details of this transition are unknown . That PapE adopts a minimum of two overall architectures suggests that more conformations may also exist, during either assembly or OFF-pathway events . One or more of these may represent the signal that PapE presents to the Cpx pathway in the absence of PapD, and the N-terminal extension may assist in the formation of one of these alternate folding intermediates . Moreover, comparisons between the crystal structures of PapD-PapK
(50) and PapD-PapE (51) complexes reveal
differences in structure between the subunits, such as in the
locations of clusters of polar and nonpolar residues on the protein
surfaces . Seemingly minute differences such as these between the
overall structures may account for Cpx recognition of some subunits
over others . Likewise, the PapG adhesin differs from the other
subunits in that it consists of a receptor-binding domain in addition
to the pilin domain . It has also been shown to activate all three
partially overlapping stress response systems,
In conclusion, despite possessing the same overall topology, the work described in this study demonstrates the individuality of each of the P pilus structural subunits . Each subunit appears to have specific functions in both the pilus fiber and the biogenesis pathway . Notably, PapG and PapE are the only two subunits in the pilus found thus far that activate Cpx . Interestingly, as pili are assembled in a top-down fashion (62), PapG and PapE are also among the first subunits to be integrated into the growing pilus at the cell surface . PapG may thus report to the cell that pilus biogenesis has begun, whereas PapE can instruct the cell to continue the process . Abundant expression of PapE would ensure that enough protein is made for both incorporation into the pilus fiber and for activation of the Cpx pathway . Cpx activates transcription of protein folding factors, such as DsbA, that are necessary for P pilus biogenesis while at the same time positively affecting pap expression (26) . This commits the cells to producing more pili and simultaneously facilitates their assembly, which may therefore ensure that daughter cells also acquire pili and survive in the urinary tract (26) . Thus, in this manner, E . coli can maintain tight control over the biogenesis of pili, allowing proper presentation of pili when needed . This work showed that the same surface on PapE that confers specificity between subunit-subunit interactions also plays an important role in the activation of the Cpx two-component signal transduction pathway . In this way, PapE could serve the dual function of providing flexibility in the tip fibrillum while also signaling the cell to commit to the process of pilus construction .
This work was supported by NIH grants AI29549 and AI48689 (to S.J.H.) and by NIGMS MERIT award GM34821 (to T.J.S.) .
|