|
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2003, p . 5693-5698, Vol . 69, No . 9 Reevaluation of Production of Paralytic Shellfish Toxin by Bacteria Associated with Dinoflagellates of the Portuguese CoastClaudia A . Martins,1* Paula Alvito,1 Maria João Tavares,1 Paulo Pereira,1 Gregory Doucette,2 and Susana Franca1 Laboratório de Microbiologia e Ecotoxicologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr . Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal,1 Marine Biotoxins Program, Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, National Ocean Service, Charleston, South Carolina 294122 Received 3 September 2002/ Accepted 3 July 2003
The potential involvement of dinoflagellate-associated bacteria in PST production, specifically the autonomous synthesis of these toxins, has been addressed using bacterial strains isolated from laboratory dinoflagellate cultures (5, 10, 15) in conjunction with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (5, 15) and in vitro assay-based toxin detection (10) . Two bacterial strains isolated previously by our group from A . lusitanicum and G . catenatum and identified as Pseudomonas stutzeri and Pseudomonas diminuta, respectively, were reported to produce PSTs (5, 7) . Nevertheless, the autonomous production of PSTs by bacteria remains a controversial subject, and there have been several recent reports of the incorrect identification of bacterial metabolites as PSTs by HPLC analysis (2, 17, 18, 20, 21) . In the context of such findings and the continuing uncertainty regarding bacterial involvement in PST toxigenesis, the present investigation was undertaken to reevaluate our previous results on the toxin content and profile in P . stutzeri and P . diminuta . Both biological in vitro (mouse neuroblastoma [MNB] assay) and chemical (HPLC) methods were employed to account for sodium channel-blocking (SCB) activity and/or compounds with the same chromatographic behavior as PSTs produced by these two bacterial isolates . Additionally, since nutritional status has been reported to influence bacterial toxicity (4), analyses for intra- and extracellular toxins under both nutrient-replete and phosphorus-limited growth conditions were conducted . For this study, P . stutzeri and P . diminuta (5, 7) were individually inoculated into 500-ml volumes of two growth media: phosphorus-limiting artificial seawater experimental (ASWE) medium (11) containing 0.5 µM Na2HPO4 as well as 37.5 mM sodium succinate as the sole carbon and energy source, and a complex organic seawater complete medium (SWC) (4, 11) rich in phosphate (5 g of Bacto Tryptone, 3 g of yeast extract, and 6 ml of 50% glycerol per liter of seawater) . Cultures were incubated at 19 to 21°C (150 oscillations min-1) under 22-µE m-2 s-1 irradiance until late log phase . At that time, a cell count (in CFU per milliliter) was obtained and cells were separated from growth medium by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 20 min, 8°C) . For toxin extraction, cell pellets were lyophilized after centrifugation and extracted with 1 ml of 0.5 N acetic acid per 100 mg of lyophilized weight . Bacterial cells were mechanically disrupted, and the suspension was centrifuged (2,000 x g, 10 min, room temperature), passed through an ultrafiltration membrane (12,400-molecular-weight cutoff; Ultrafree C3GC; Millipore), and stored at -20°C until analyzed . Aliquots of each extract were then passed over a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Millipore Co.) for final cleanup . For extracellular-toxin analysis, 50 ml of each supernatant fraction was stored at -20°C prior to analysis by MNB assay and HPLC . The same volume of a control flask (ASWE or SWC medium only) was used as a negative control in the MNB assay . This assay was carried out according to the method described by Gallacher and Birkbeck (9) . The concentrations of ouabain and veratridine required were determined by checkerboard assay (each toxin was titrated against various concentrations of the other to optimize the amount of each; three wells per dilution) using concentrations of ouabain from 0 to 0.3 mM and of veratridine from 0 to 0.07 mM in the absence of saxitoxin (STX) . Concentrations causing maximum cell death, as evidenced by absorbance levels below 20% (540 nm), were used in the assays . These levels were optimized for each assay according to the number of subcultures performed . After 12 subcultures with ASWE medium, the assay was not sensitive to veratridine concentrations below 0.05 mM . These results emphasize the importance of monitoring assay performance and minimizing the number of subcultures . For SWC medium, lower concentrations of veratridine could be maintained . The MNB assay was performed according to the method of Gallacher et al . (10) . Briefly, an STX dose-response analysis using a certified reference standard (National Research Council, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) was performed on a 1/10 dilution of each growth medium over the range of 5 to 160 nM . Supernatant fractions and cell extracts, collected before and after cleanup on a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge, were assayed using the following dilutions in 1/10-strength growth medium: 1/8, 1/10, 1/16, 1/32, and 1/64 . The same dilutions of uninoculated growth medium served as negative controls . It is noteworthy that the ASWE medium employed clearly affected the percentage of cell survival and possibly the assay sensitivity, as SCB activity as high as 25% was detected in the 1/10 dilution . Nevertheless, this interference was overcome by using supernatant dilutions higher than 1/16 . For the HPLC analysis, postcolumn oxidation was performed by the method of Oshima (19) . Three mixtures of PST standards containing derivatives of the STX group (neoSTX, dcSTX, and STX), gonyautoxins (GTX1 to GTX5), and N-sulfocarbamoyl toxins (C1 to C4), kindly provided by Y . Oshima (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan), were used for identification purposes . The chromatographic separation was performed on a reversed-phase C8 column (Hypersil; MOS, 5 µm; 4.6 by 150 mm; Supelco) . When bacterial extracts (ca. 108 CFU/ml) were analyzed by MNB assay, a low level of cell survival (i.e., direct cell lysis) was observed for dilutions up to the 1/10 (Fig . 1A) . SCB activity was detected in cell extracts of P . stutzeri grown in either SWC or ASWE medium . As for P . diminuta, SCB was also detected when the bacterium was grown in ASWE medium but not when this strain was grown in SWC medium (Table 1) .
Regardless of the growth medium used, neither compounds with SCB activity nor direct lytic effects were evident upon analysis of P . diminuta and P . stutzeri culture supernatants by MNB assay . Figure 2 shows the HPLC-FLD (postcolumn fluorescence derivatization) chromatograms for the analysis of the STX group in P . stutzeri and P . diminuta grown in SWC medium . Similar results were obtained for bacteria grown in ASWE medium . One peak with a retention time similar to STX was observed in the P . stutzeri extracts (Fig . 2C) . However, unlike the standard toxin, this compound was still detected after the postcolumn oxidation process was deactivated (Fig . 2F) and was therefore considered to represent a compound other than STX .
The analyses of our extracts by postcolumn oxidation HPLC corroborates some of the recent reports (2, 20) of incorrect identification for some PST peaks in bacterial samples . The HPLC profiles obtained were similar to those previously reported for these strains by Franca et al . (5), comprising GTX4, GTX1, and C3, yet discounted in all cases because their chromatographic behavior differed from that of the PST standards . Most PSTs do not exhibit autofluorescence and can be detected as fluorescent compounds only after chemical oxidation with the postcolumn system . However, the bacterial peaks regained their fluorescence even after removal of the oxidizing reagent . As reported by Shimizu et al . (22), the peaks detected by HPLC could be attributed to cellular compounds coextracted by the method used, since neither the growth media by themselves nor the supernatant fractions showed peaks with retention times similar to those of PSTs . Our results were corroborated further by precolumn oxidation HPLC analyses of the same bacterial extracts (data not shown) . In the present study, optimized conditions and approaches for both production and detection of toxins were employed . Specifically, growth conditions were manipulated to yield up to three- to fourfold increases in cellular toxin content (4) . Moreover, supernatant fractions that other workers had described as containing toxin levels higher than those found inside the bacterial cells (10) were also assayed in order to more rigorously evaluate our prior results . Nonetheless, using a phosphorous-limited medium with a high salt concentration did not permit detection of PST toxins by the MNB assay, possibly because a high dilution was required to eliminate interference from the medium . In the present study, for the assay with ASWE medium, the use of such high dilutions in high-salt media may have precluded the detection of low toxin levels . The assay results for the two growth media demonstrate the need to include negative controls when conducting the MNB assay for bacteria (8) . In the present case, SCB activity was observed for the ASWE medium by itself; this would yield false-positive results . In fact, the MNB assay is known to be prone to matrix effects (8); this was apparent for the growth media used as controls for both supernatants fractions and extracts in the present study . Arguably, in the latter case, extracts of related bacteria not associated with dinoflagellates might have served as better negative controls; however, centrifugation of cells for extract preparation does not remove all growth medium constituents, and thus certain matrix effects of media and extracts are expected to be similar . Also, the absence of intracellular PSTs, as determined by the MNB assay, was corroborated by HPLC . In conclusion, our findings are not consistent with previously reported bacterial PST contents determined under similar study conditions, and they add to the growing number of reports that advise caution in the interpretation of HPLC and MNB assay results for PST detection . Regarding the potential for bacterial production of PSTs, further tandem mass spectrometry studies using higher bacterial biomass levels will be required before this possibility can be excluded . Also, the culture conditions may prove to be a determinant in bacterial toxin production . Although phosphorous limitation failed to elicit toxin production, nothing can be concluded regarding the need for dinoflagellates to be present for bacterial toxins to be induced .
We appreciate the work of Ana Gago and Jim Lawrence in conducting the precolumn HPLC analyses of the extracts . The National Ocean Service (NOS) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any product or material mentioned in this publication . No reference shall be made to NOS, or to this publication furnished by NOS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NOS approves, recommends, or endorses any product or material mentioned herein or which has as its purpose any intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NOS publication .
What Is Biofilm?,
What Is Molecular Microbiology?,
What Is Genetics?,
What Is Bioengineering?,
What Is Salmonella?,
i,
Microorganisms,
n,
Bacterium,
s,
Microorganism,
o,
Bacteriology,
n,
Microbes,
s,
Schizosaccharomyces,
c,
Salmonella typhimurium,
i,
Staphylococcus,
n,
Microbial,
e,
Clostridia,
n,
Escherichia coli,
e,
Bacillus,
i,
Antibiotics,
o,
Cell cultures,
r,
Yeasts,
c,
Sepsis,
a,
Salmonella typhimurium,
n,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
a,
Bacillus,
n,
Antibiotics,
s,
Biocontactor,
e,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
c,
Bacteriophage,
s,
Pseudomonas,
c,
Antibiotics,
r,
Microorganism
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||