|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2003, p . 6809-6814, Vol . 185, No . 23 Chemolithoorganotrophic Growth of Nitrosomonas europaea on FructoseNorman G . Hommes, Luis A . Sayavedra-Soto, and Daniel J . Arp* Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2902 Received 4 August 2003/ Accepted 1 September 2003
Obligate lithoautotrophy in N . europaea and other bacteria has been investigated for over 100 years, since Winogradsky's initial characterizations of nitrifiers (reviewed in references 17 and 18) . Isotopic labeling studies have provided direct evidence for the incorporation of organic compounds into N . europaea and other autotrophs . These compounds include pyruvate (4, 12, 13, 20), acetate (12, 13, 18, 20),
The recent completion of the N . europaea genomic sequence (3) has presented an opportunity to examine the genetic basis for the inability of this organism to grow heterotrophically . In general, while genes for NH3 catabolism, assimilation of inorganic nutrients, and biosynthesis of organic constituents were found, genes for the catabolism of organic compounds were limited . However, the genes required for catabolism of carbohydrates through the glycolytic pathway to the tricarboxylic acid cycle were present in the genome, suggesting that N . europaea might be able to utilize some carbohydrates for growth . A survey of transporter genes in the N . europaea genome revealed several genes similar to genes encoding transporters of inorganic compounds and ions and a few genes which appear to encode transporters of amino acids . In addition, genes encoding several components of a potential phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase (PTS) system which had the highest levels of sequence similarity to fructose or mannose transporters were also identified . These observations raised the possibility that N . europaea could utilize fructose or mannose for growth . In this study, we found that fructose can indeed support growth of this organism, and we obtained the first evidence of chemolithoorganotrophic growth of N . europaea .
To determine if fructose could serve as an energy source, cells were incubated in medium containing fructose (50 mM), (NH4)2SO4 (25 mM), Na2CO3 (3.9 mM), and acetylene (1% in the gas phase) . As a mechanism-based inactivator of the oxidation of NH3 by ammonia monooxygenase, acetylene denies cells the ability to oxidize NH3 for energy . The ratio of the amount of NH3 oxidized to the amount of C incorporated into cell mass was calculated . The amount of NH3 oxidized was assumed to be equal to the measured amount of nitrite produced . The amount of carbon incorporated was based on the measured ratio of optical density to carbon content obtained by total carbon analysis as described below . 14C labeling. Bottles were prepared with growth medium (25 ml) lacking carbonate . A 50 mM fructose solution containing D-[U-14C]fructose (275 mCi/mmol; DuPont NEN Products, Wilmington, Del.) was added to obtain a final specific activity of 160 µCi/mmol . CO2 was removed as described above . N . europaea cells, prepared as described above, were inoculated into the sealed bottles to obtain an initial optical density at 600 nm of 0.010 . The cultures were incubated for 3 days at 30°C with shaking . Each bottle contained an empty glass test tube, and 3 h prior to the end of the labeling experiment, 0.5 ml of 1 M KOH was injected into the test tube to trap the evolved CO2 . At the end of the experiment, the bottles were opened, and the 14CO2 content of each KOH solution was measured with a liquid scintillation counter . The cells were sedimented by centrifugation at 12,000 x g, washed three times, and analyzed to determine the optical density, protein content, and 14C incorporation . Total carbon analysis of the fructose-grown cells with a C/N analyzer (Dumas combustion/reduction) linked with mass spectroscopy was performed at the Stable Isotope Research Unit of the Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University . T-RFLP analysis. To check the purity of the cultures, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) PCR was performed with total DNA isolated from the cultures by using the 16S rRNA general eubacterial primers 27F-6Fam (5'-6-carboxyfluorescein-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) (10) (fluorescently labeled) and 338R (5'-GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT) (2) obtained from Invitrogen Corp . (Frederick, Md.) . The PCR was carried out for 30 cycles of 97°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min . The resultant PCR fragment was digested with restriction endonucleases AluI, HaeIII, and TaqI (Promega, Madison, Wis.) separately, and the resultant fluorescently labeled fragments were analyzed by gel electrophoresis by using the GeneScan Analysis software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) .
14C labeling. To directly demonstrate that N . europaea cells can use fructose as a primary carbon source, we included 14C-labeled fructose in the medium . The amount of fructose incorporated into cell mass was calculated from the amount of 14C label incorporated into the cell pellet . The total amount of carbon that accumulated in the cell mass during growth of the culture was estimated from the increase in the optical density of the culture . The relationship of optical density to carbon content obtained by total carbon analysis was determined to be 125.08 µg of C · ml-1 · optical density unit-1 . For cultures grown with 50 mM fructose and no Na2CO3, [14C]fructose accounted for 91% of the carbon incorporated into cells (Table 1) . The percentage dropped to 31.6% for cultures containing 50 mM fructose and 3.9 mM Na2CO3 even though the total amount of carbon assimilated increased 3.7-fold . The percentage dropped further to 2.2% for cultures containing 3.9 mM carbonate and 1 mM fructose . Cultures containing 1 mM fructose and no Na2CO3 did not grow (data not shown) . A sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel of the labeled cell pellet showed that the 14C label appeared to be uniformly incorporated into cell protein (data not shown) . These experiments established that when fructose was provided as the sole carbon source, N . europaea cells used sufficient fructose to account for the observed growth of the culture .
Energy from fructose. The results described above indicate that fructose can serve as a carbon source for growth of N . europaea . To determine if fructose could also serve as an energy source, cells were incubated in medium containing fructose, NH4+, Na2CO3, and acetylene (which prevents the use of NH3 as an energy source) . These cultures did not grow, indicating that N . europaea cells cannot derive energy from the catabolism of fructose to support growth . On the other hand, cells assimilating fructose (in the absence of acetylene) oxidized less NH3 to produce a similar amount of biomass (Table 1) . In N . europaea, NO2- production is the result of NH3 oxidation and is therefore representative of the energy demands of cells during growth . In medium containing 3.9 mM Na2CO3 alone the organism oxidized 27.5 mol of NH3 per mol of C fixed (data not shown) . In medium containing Na2CO3 and 1 mM fructose, 27 mol of NH3 was oxidized per mol of C fixed . In medium containing Na2CO3 and 50 mM fructose, only 22 mol of NH3 was oxidized per mol of C, a reduction of about 20% . In cultures containing 50 mM fructose alone, 15 mol of NH3 was oxidized per mol of C fixed, a reduction of 45% . Thus, the availability of fructose clearly reduced the requirement for NH3 . Culture purity and CO2 leakage. The possibility that the observed growth could have been due to contamination of the cultures was eliminated by various means . First, plates with rich media contained no contaminants . Second, the same growth results were obtained with N . europaea strains containing an antibiotic marker (Kan) (11) grown in the presence of kanamycin (20 µg/ml) . Third, total genomic DNA isolated from fructose-grown cultures and digested with the restriction endonuclease EcoRI showed the same digestion pattern on agarose gels as N . europaea control DNA (data not shown) . And finally, T-RFLP PCR performed with 16S rRNA gene universal eubacterial primers was used to detect possible bacterial contaminants . The PCR produced a DNA fragment whose length (341 bp) was the same as the length of the 16S rRNA sequence found in the genomic sequence of N . europaea . The 341-bp PCR fragment, digested with the restriction endonucleases AluI, HaeIII, and TaqI separately, produced DNA fragments consistent with the N . europaea sequence and did not produce other fragments indicative of DNA from other bacteria . Therefore, the cells growing in the fructose cultures in these experiments were N . europaea cells . The possibility that the observed growth might have been due to CO2 leakage into the bottles or carbonate contamination in the growth media was also considered . However, when gas chromatography was used to monitor the CO2 contents in control bottles without cells, there was no indication of CO2 leakage . To test for carbonate contamination in the growth medium, bottles were purged of CO2 under a vacuum, and the fructose-containing medium was then acidified to convert any carbonate to CO2 . Gas chromatography of the headspace gasses showed that the amounts of carbonate in the media were <100 nmol, a level too low to support growth of the cultures . Growth on pyruvate and other substrates. Since N . europaea was found to grow on fructose, other organic substrates, which had previously been shown to be utilized by the cells, were tested to determine their abilities to support growth . These experiments were performed like the experiments with fructose . It was found that N . europaea cells could grow by using pyruvate as the sole carbon source (Fig . 2A) . Growth was observed with pyruvate concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 mM . Unlike high fructose concentrations, a high pyruvate concentration (50 mM) was inhibitory after an initial period of growth . The doubling time for growth on 10 mM pyruvate was 20 h . No bacterial contaminants were detected in the cultures when they were tested on rich medium plates, by microscopic examination, or by comparing the restriction enzyme digestion patterns of genomic DNA, as was done with fructose cultures . When N . europaea cells were cultured with both fructose (50 mM) and pyruvate (10 mM), the growth rates were higher than the growth rates with either substrate alone (Fig . 2B) .
Chemolithotrophs meet most of their needs for cell carbon through assimilation of C1 compounds, such as CO2, despite the fact that many chemolithotrophs have been shown to assimilate organic carbon compounds (18) . Our experiments confirmed the preference of N . europaea cells for CO2 as the carbon source, as shown by the higher growth rates and higher final cell densities observed when cells were grown on CO2 and by the lower proportion of [14C]fructose-derived carbon incorporated into cell mass when the cells were grown in the presence of carbonate . The preference for CO2 is noteworthy in light of the high energetic cost of fixing CO2 and the potential energy savings that using reduced carbon substrates would represent . The lower growth rates and lower cell densities observed during growth on either fructose or pyruvate as the sole C source show that there are significant limitations to using these substrates . These limitations could include either transport or metabolic inefficiencies or both . It has long been suggested that the reason that autotrophs are unable to use organic compounds as growth substrates may be that the transporters for organic compounds are either absent or rate limiting (19) . Alternatively, metabolic limitations could include low substrate turnover rates, low substrate affinities of catabolic enzymes, or feedback inhibition . The high concentrations of fructose required to maximize growth of N . europaea could be consistent with either transport or metabolic limitations, with the exception of feedback inhibition . Growth of N . europaea cells on pyruvate resulted in higher growth rates and higher cell densities than growth on fructose, although the values were still less than those obtained with carbonate or CO2 . Since pyruvate should be readily metabolized in the cell, the slower growth with pyruvate than with CO2 might reflect transport limitations for this compound . The growth of N . europaea on fructose or pyruvate demonstrates that the cells are metabolically competent to use these compounds for growth . Pyruvate can be directly oxidized to acetyl coenzyme A . In the case of fructose, the metabolic fate of the compound depends in part on the mechanism by which it enters the cell . PTS transport systems characteristically phosphorylate the carbohydrate as it enters the cell . If fructose enters as fructose 6-phosphate, it should be readily metabolized via the glycolytic and gluconeogenesis pathways . However, if fructose enters as fructose 1-phosphate (as is common in other bacteria), it would have to either be phosphorylated to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate by 1-phosphofructokinase or be converted to fructose 6-phosphate by a phosphohexose mutase . However, genes encoding these enzymes were not identified in the genome . The other potential growth substrates for N . europaea that were tested, glucose, glycerol, mannose, mannitol, citrate, and sodium acetate, were unable to support growth . Previous studies involving the assimilation of organic substrates by N . europaea have generally been concerned with either (i) establishing the ability to take up labeled compounds in the presence of NH3 and Na2CO3 or (ii) attempting to replace NH3 with an organic substrate as an energy source . While pyruvate, acetate, and glucose assimilation was examined in these previous studies, none of the studies looked for growth when the organic compound was used as a sole carbon source . Thus, as with the results for fructose and pyruvate, the growth results which we observed with the compounds listed above did not contradict the results of previous work . The lack of growth on acetate may be due in part to the low rate of acetate uptake by N . europaea observed previously (18) . The range of organic substrates able to support growth of N . europaea appears to be limited to a few specific compounds . The NH3-oxidizing bacteria are unique among the diverse groups of chemolithotrophic bacteria in that there have been no NH3 oxidizers identified to date that are capable of heterotrophic growth (i.e., growth in which organic compounds are utilized for energy) (18) . We nevertheless considered the possibility that fructose could be used as an energy source for the cells, as well as a carbon source . However, neither fructose nor the other organic compounds tested could replace NH3 as a sole energy source for growth . On the other hand, the observation that lower levels of NO2- were produced in the presence of fructose relative to the amount of carbon fixed indicates that the assimilation of fructose by cells provides the cells with some energy benefit . This benefit may be due to a lower requirement for energetically expensive CO2 fixation by the Calvin cycle . Mannose was included in our experiments as a potential growth substrate since analysis of the N . europaea genomic sequence indicated that the potential PTS carbohydrate transporter exhibits sequence similarity to both fructose and mannose transporters . Mannose did not support growth in our experiments and in fact inhibited growth at concentrations above 10 mM when cells were growing on Na2CO3 . The ability of mannose to inhibit growth may suggest that the sugar indeed entered the cell and interfered with metabolism . Many PTS transporters transport alternative substrates, although with reduced affinity (15) . Thus, it is possible that fructose and mannose may be taken up by the same transporter . A closer examination of the PTS genes found in the N . europaea genome failed to identify the cognate substrate for the putative transporter . A typical PTS complex contains two phosphoproteins, EI and HPR, which are common to all PTS systems, as well as three additional carbohydrate-specific domains (IIA, IIB, and IIC), which may occur as separate proteins or with two or three domains combined into a single protein (16) . In the N . europaea genome, the genes encoding IIA, HPR, and EI are located together . A separate, second gene for IIA was also found . However, BLAST searches of the genome failed to locate strong candidates for genes encoding IIB and IIC . Perhaps N . europaea does possess IIB and IIC homologs but the sequences have diverged too much to be recognized . While the fructose PTS system in some bacteria uses a unique protein, FPr, instead of HPr, no gene encoding FPr was found in N . europaea . The absence of a gene encoding FPr, as well as the genes encoding the enzymes needed to bring fructose 1-phosphate into central metabolism (see above), suggests that fructose may be imported via a non-fructose-type PTS system . The primary substrate for the putative PTS transporter remains unclear . It must also be noted that while it seems reasonable to consider a role for a PTS transporter for growth on fructose, the results presented here do not directly establish that fructose assimilation occurs via the identified PTS transporter . A transporter for pyruvate was not identified in the genomic sequence . Although the mechanisms by which these compounds are imported remain enigmatic, the uncertainties do not diminish the primary observation of this study, namely, that N . europaea is able to grow on fructose or pyruvate as a carbon source . Given that the genomic sequence of N . europaea encodes so few transporters for organic substrates, the finding that fructose transport can occur seems unusual . At this point it is unclear what role assimilation of fructose or pyruvate might play for N . europaea in the environment when its preferred carbon source, CO2, should be generally available . However, since N . europaea is often limited by the amount of NH3 and therefore by the amount of energy available, these organic compounds might provide benefits both as sources of metabolic intermediates and by reducing the biosynthetic energy needs of the cells .
What Is Molecular Biology?,
What Is Listeria Monocytogenes?,
What Is Protein?,
What Is Biotechnology?,
What Is Amino Acid?,
s,
Bacteriology,
n,
Microbes,
n,
Microbe,
a,
Bacteria,
a,
Bacterium,
s,
Streptococci,
o,
Escherichia coli,
n,
Water treatment,
s,
Campylobacter,
e,
Escherichia coli,
o,
Antibiotics,
r,
Bacteriophages,
r,
Bacteriological,
a,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Antimicrobial,
c,
Thermophile,
i,
Escherichia coli,
c,
Staphylococcus aureus,
n,
Microorganism,
s,
Microorganisms,
e,
S. cerevisiae,
n,
S. cerevisiae,
e,
Ps. putida,
c,
Sepsis,
o,
Micrococci,
i,
Clostridia
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||