|
|
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2002, p . 3521-3529, Vol . 184, No . 13 Involvement of the PrrB/PrrA Two-Component System in Nitrite Respiration in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.3: Evidence for Transcriptional RegulationWilliam P . Laratta, Peter S . Choi, Ivan E . Tosques, and James P . Shapleigh* Department of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-8101 Received 4 February 2002/ Accepted 8 April 2002
During denitrification, nitrate is reduced to nitrite, nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide, and then nitrogen gas (N2) . Each intermediate is obligatory and freely diffusible . As expected, denitrifiers contain several nitrogen oxide stimulons, since multiple intermediates are produced during denitrification . Nitrate, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide each activate the expression of a distinct cluster of genes (4, 20) . The mechanisms used by denitrifiers to detect the presence of each nitrogen oxide are beginning to be understood . According to recent findings, Fnr-like regulators and two-component systems have been implicated in nitrate sensing (14, 51), while gene activation in the presence of nitric oxide requires either an activator belonging to the FNR family (21, 47, 50) or one belonging to the recently described RpoN-dependent family (35) . Less is known about the mechanism for the sensing of nitrous oxide, although genes required for this process have been identified (6) . In addition to detecting nitrogen oxides, denitrifying bacteria also require a means of regulating genes that are preferentially expressed under anaerobic conditions . The transcriptional regulator Fnr is probably the best-studied regulator of this type . It functions as an oxygen-dependent regulator (36) . When oxygen concentrations become limiting, an iron-sulfur cluster in Fnr undergoes a structural change causing Fnr to bind to its target DNA (36) . Fnr-like proteins are required for anaerobic growth by denitrifiers, but the role of these proteins seems to differ among the various denitrifiers (1, 48, 49) . Rhodobacter sphaeroides strain 2.4.3 is a photosynthetic bacterium capable of dissimilatory reduction of nitrogen oxides under anaerobic conditions (27) . Two essential enzymes in this process are nitrite reductase (Nir) and nitric oxide reductase (Nor), encoded by the nirK gene and norCBQD operon, respectively . It has been shown that NnrR, a member of the FNR/Crp family of transcriptional regulators, is necessary for the expression of nirK and nor during denitrification (44, 45) . Studies of regulation by NnrR demonstrated that the presence of NO is required for transcriptional activation during denitrification, yet the mechanism whereby NnrR senses NO is not known (21) . To date, no other regulatory factors involved in the regulation of nirK have been described . Bacterial photosynthesis is another anaerobic process in which gene expression is regulated in response to low oxygen tensions . In addition to Fnr, genes for anaerobic growth in many photosynthetic bacteria are regulated by a two-component sensor kinase system (12, 25, 29) . In R . sphaeroides, this system is composed of the sensor kinase PrrB and the response regulator PrrA . In Rhodobacter capsulatus, these proteins have been designated RegB and RegA (29) . Inactivation of prrB in R . sphaeroides 2.4.1 causes impaired photosynthetic growth, while inactivation of prrA eliminates photosynthetic growth (10, 12) . Genes regulated by PrrBA include puc, puf, and puh, all of which are required for photosynthesis, along with genes required for heme biosynthesis, CO2 fixation, and N2 fixation (13, 16, 31) . Recently, a model for regulation by PrrBA was presented that suggests that PrrB receives a signal from the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase with the assistance of the protein PrrC (11, 32) . When oxygen concentrations are high, the reductant flow through the cbb3-type cytochrome complex results in PrrB, which is believed to have both kinase and phosphatase activities (10), receiving an inhibitory signal transmitted through PrrC (11) . This inhibitory signal causes the equilibrium of PrrB, whose default state is in the kinase mode, to shift to the phosphatase mode, resulting in dephosphorylation of PrrA (31, 33, 34) . When the inhibitory signal is removed by decreased activity of the oxidase, the kinase activity of PrrB predominates, causing PrrA-P levels to increase . In a screen for mutants of R . sphaeroides 2.4.3 that are unable to grow by using nitrite as their sole terminal electron acceptor, four strains were isolated that contained insertions within the gene encoding PrrB . Study of these mutants led us to investigate the role of the PrrBA two-component system in denitrification . Here we provide evidence that the PrrBA two-component system exerts transcriptional control over nirK . The requirement for PrrBA suggests that nirK expression is under the control of both NnrR, which regulates only those genes specific for nitric oxide metabolism, and the global regulator PrrA, which adjusts cellular physiology in response to redox status .
Mutant isolation and characterization.
The procedures used to isolate strains unable to grow with nitrite as their terminal electron acceptor have been described previously (44) . The site of transposon insertion for three strains was determined by the amplification of genomic ends (28) . Chromosomal DNA from the mutant was isolated and digested with either PstI or BamHI, which cut within the Tn5 and within the adjacent chromosomal DNA . The restriction fragments were ligated into pUC19 (54), and a product was amplified by using an oligomer that binds to pUC19 and an oligomer that binds to the Tn5 . The amplified fragment was restricted and cloned into pT7-19U and then sequenced from both ends . Sequences from these three mutants confirmed the presence of the Tn5 and its site of insertion . The insertion site within the fourth strain was determined by digesting genomic DNA from strain 37 with BamHI, ligating the digested DNA into pUC19, and transforming into DH5 Construction of vectors and strains. The vector used to inactivate prrA in 2.4.3 was constructed by cloning a DNA fragment containing a portion of prrC and most of prrA into pSUP202 (41) . This region was amplified from strain 2.4.3, and the 860-bp amplification fragment, which contained restriction sites for EcoRI and KpnI, was digested and cloned into pUC19 (52) to form pWL-PRRA1 . This fragment was moved into the mobilizable suicide vector pSUP202 (43) by digesting pWL-PRRA1 with EcoRI and PstI to create pWL-PRRA2 . pWL-PRRA3 was created by digesting pWL-PRRA2 with XhoI, which cuts within the prrA reading frame, and ligating into it a 1.2-kb aph containing a SalI fragment from pUC4K (Pharmacia) . A PrrnB'-cycA fusion was constructed by first isolating a HindIII/BamHI fragment from pUI1124 (53) containing the promoter region of the R . sphaeroides rrnB gene and then cloning it into pRK415 (18) to create pYSW35 (Y . Wang and J . P . Shapleigh, unpublished data) . The cycA gene was amplified from pC2P404.1 (5) to generate a 553-bp fragment with BglII and EcoRI restriction sites at the ends . This was digested with BglII and EcoRI and cloned into BamHI/EcoRI-digested pYSW35 to create pWL-CYCA . A similar strategy was used to construct a PrrnB'-nirK fusion . In this case, the nirK gene was amplified from pNIRB (44) to generate a 1,381-bp fragment with BamHI and KpnI restriction sites . This fragment was digested and cloned into BamHI/KpnI-digested pYSW35 to create pWLNIR . Truncated nirK-lacZ fusions were created such that the promoter extended 84 or 298 bases upstream of the transcriptional start site of nirK. For pNIR84, the nirK promoter was amplified with an upstream primer that annealed 84 nucleotides upstream and a downstream primer that annealed 199 nucleotides downstream of the transcriptional start site . The amplification product was digested with KpnI/PstI and cloned into pRK415 . A 4.7-kb lacZ cassette from pKOK6 (19) was moved into the PstI site of the resulting plasmid, and the proper orientation of the cassette was confirmed by using an EcoRI digest . pNIR298 was constructed by using the same strategy, except in this case a primer was used that annealed 298 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site . Absorbance spectrum of crude extracts. Cells were grown microaerobically, harvested, resuspended in an equal volume of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and disrupted by passage through a French pressure cell . Cell extracts were obtained by centrifugation for 10 min at 16,000 x g . To confirm the presence of cytochrome c2, the dithionite-reduced minus air-oxidized spectrum was obtained by monitoring the absorbance of the sample between 400 and 700 nm with a Beckman DU 640 spectrophotometer .
Assays for enzymatic activities.
ß-Galactosidase activities were determined in duplicate on at least two independently grown cultures as previously described (45) . Samples were taken at successive times during growth, and the highest values obtained before the cells stopped growing were used to determine the reported values . To measure Nir activity, 500 µl was removed from cultures grown under denitrifying conditions, added to microcentrifuge tubes, washed two times in an equal volume of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and resuspended in 500 µl of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) . Then, 36 nmol of sodium nitrite was added to each tube, and the cells were incubated at 30°C . In a modification of a previously described protocol for quantifying nitrite accumulation (42), we performed a colorimetric assay on the reactions to measure a decrease in nitrite concentration over time, which correlates to Nir activity . Nitrite concentration in this assay is proportional to the A540 of a sample . Thus, by subtracting the A540 obtained during a test reaction from the A540 of a standard containing 36 nmol of sodium nitrite in the absence of cells, we were able to quantify the amount of nitrite reduced . Activity was calculated by using the formula units = 100 ·
Tn5 insertion sites within three independent strains, 14.3, 5.11, and 133.12, were determined to lie near the 5' end of the prrB gene (Table 1) . In a fourth strain, designated strain 37, the insertion site of the transposon was found to lie midway between the 5' and 3' ends of the open reading frame (Table 1) . This places the insertion downstream of the histidine proposed to be the site of autophosphorylation, whereas in the other three mutants, insertion occurs upstream of this residue (12) . Analysis of the DNA sequence obtained from the amplified products showed that sequence from strain 2.4.3 had a >90% identity with the same region of the 2.4.1 strain (data not shown) . The gene order of the prrABC region is conserved among a wide range of photosynthetic bacteria, with prrC and prrA being adjacent and transcribed in the same direction while prrB lies upstream and is divergently transcribed from prrC (Fig . 1A) (25) . Sequence analysis showed that this gene order is conserved in R . sphaeroides 2.4.3 (Fig . 1A) .
Expression of the nirK-lacZ fusion was monitored in strains 2.4.3 and PRRA under various conditions to evaluate the impact of prrA inactivation on nirK expression . When grown aerobically in unamended Sistrom's medium, both strains had roughly equal levels of nirK-lacZ expression (Fig . 3) . The expression of the nirK-lacZ fusion in strain 2.4.3 was threefold higher than that in PRRA during microaerobic growth in Sistrom's medium (Fig . 3) . As shown in Fig . 3, when microaerobic cultures contained nitrate, nirK-lacZ expression was 10-fold higher in strain 2.4.3 than in PRRA . Surprisingly, culturing either strain under strictly anaerobic conditions with nitrate led to poor expression of the fusion (Fig . 3) . This result was unexpected, because denitrification is typically considered an anaerobic process, and the expression of the nirK-lacZ fusion in the 2.4.3 background was expected to lead to high activity .
Effect of nirK expression from a heterologous promoter. Transcription of nirK is part of a positive feedback loop . The enzyme encoded by this gene, nitrite reductase, catalyzes the reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide . This latter molecule is the signal for the transcriptional activator of nirK, NnrR (21) . Because of this positive feedback loop, assessing the role of PrrBA in modulating nirK expression is not straightforward . For instance, it is known that PrrBA (or RegBA) is involved in the transcriptional activation of a number of genes encoding components of the electron transport chain . In particular, the cycA and cycY genes, encoding cytochromes c2 and cY, respectively, are partially under the regulation of this system (17, 43) . Urata and Satoh have shown that cytochrome c2 donates electrons to nitrite reductase in some Rhodobacter species (46), while preliminary evidence suggests that cytochrome cY may also donate electrons to nitrite reductase (W . P . Laratta and J . P . Shapleigh, unpublished data) . Thus, impaired electron flow in strain PRRA could result in the decreased Nir activity observed, which would lead to a decrease in nirK-lacZ expression . To determine whether decreased nirK expression was due to impairment of nitrite reductase activity, the transcription of this gene was uncoupled from Nir activity . Plasmid pWLNIR was constructed so that the nirK gene would be expressed from the PrrnB ribosomal promoter of R . sphaeroides 2.4.1 (53) . The plasmid was moved into strain 11.10, a nirK-deficient strain, to verify that nitrite reductase was produced . After overnight growth in nitrate-amended medium, 11.10 pWLNIR was tested for nitrite accumulation and for in vivo nitrite reductase activity . Both tests confirmed that the PrrnB'-nirK fusion could complement the nitrite reductase deficiency (data not shown) . Given that the PrrnB'-nirK fusion of pWLNIR could complement the nirK deficiency in 11.10, the plasmid was moved into strains 2.4.3 and PRRA . These strains were grown microaerobically in nitrate-amended medium and assayed for nitrite accumulation and nitrite reductase activity . Table 3 shows nitrite accumulation and nitrite reductase activity for strains 2.4.3, PRRA, 2.4.3 pWLNIR, and PRRA pWLNIR . Only strain PRRA accumulated nitrite, while the strains complemented with pWLNIR had nitrite reductase activities similar to that of strain 2.4.3 . As an additional test to determine whether changes in cytochrome content might be influencing nitrite reductase activity, a plasmid carrying a PrrnB'-cycA fusion was moved into strain 14.3 . Since cytochrome c2 has been shown to donate electrons to Nir (48), its overexpression should relieve problems associated with the limitation of reductant . Spectrophotometry confirmed that the presence of the PrrnB'-cycA fusion in strain 14.3 resulted in the production of a cytochrome that was spectroscopically indistinguishable from native cytochrome c2 (data not shown) . However, even with excess cytochrome, the in vivo nitrite reductase activity of strain 14.3 remained impaired (Table 3) . Truncation of the nirK promoter. The experiments described above are not consistent with PrrBA indirectly affecting nirK expression by controlling the expression of regulatory factors, Nir assembly, or the supply of reductant . This suggests that PrrBA may directly regulate nirK expression . Previous studies of PrrA and its homologue RegA suggest that these proteins often act in concert with other regulators to activate gene transcription (8, 31, 54) . If this occurs with nirK, then PrrA might be predicted to have a binding site upstream of the transcription start site . Previous work has identified the transcription start site of nirK and identified a putative NnrR binding site centered 43.5 bases upstream (44) . Similar binding sites have been identified upstream of two other sets of genes, the nor operon and the nnrS gene, which lie within the NnrR regulon . Studies on the promoter region of the nor operon demonstrate that its promoter retains full expression when truncated to within 41 bases of the center of the putative NnrR binding site (2) . Similarly, significant expression of the nnrS promoter is retained when it is truncated to within 21 bases of the center of its putative NnrR binding site (3) . Comparable truncation experiments were carried out with nirK to determine whether there might be additional sequence elements required for its expression . For the truncation experiments, plasmid pJS84, which contains a nirK-lacZ fusion with approximately 2 kb of DNA upstream of the transcriptional start, was used as a control . The expression from pJS84 was compared to those from plasmids pNIR298 and pNIR84, which include 298 and 84 bases upstream of the nirK transcription start, respectively (Table 1 and Fig . 1B) . Cultures of strain 2.4.3 and PRRA containing these plasmids were grown overnight under microaerobic conditions in media amended with nitrate . As shown in Table 4, strain 2.4.3 carrying the pNIR298 nirK-lacZ fusion had 85% of the activity of the full-length fusion . Under the same conditions, strain 2.4.3 carrying the pNIR84 nirK-lacZ fusion had only 3% of the activity of the pJS84 nirK-lacZ fusion (Table 4) . As expected, only limited expression of the fusions was observed in strain PRRA (Table 4) . These data suggest that there are additional regulatory sites within the nirK promoter that are not present in other genes in the NnrR regulon .
To test whether inactivation of the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase affected nirK expression, two 2.4.1 cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase mutants, CCON To further study why nitrite accumulated in the 2.4.1 derivatives, we disrupted the ccoN gene of the denitrifying strain 2.4.3 . As with 2.4.1, the 2.4.3 ccoN derivative, CCON, also accumulated nitrite after microaerobic growth in nitrate-amended medium . Measurement of its in vivo nitrite reductase activity revealed that it was similar to that found in the PrrA mutant (Table 3) . Next, pJS84, which contains the nirK-lacZ fusion, was moved into CCON, and ß-galactosidase activity was monitored . Consistent with the decrease in Nir activity, there was >10-fold less expression of the fusion in CCON than in strain 2.4.3 (Fig . 2) . These results demonstrate that the ccoN background has a negative effect on nirK expression .
Phenotypic characterization of the four randomly generated prrB mutants demonstrated there were two distinct phenotypes . The first phenotype evidenced only a moderate decrease in nitrite reductase expression, as demonstrated by the accumulation of low levels of nitrite when the strain was cultured in nitrate-amended medium (Table 3) and only a modest decrease in nirK-lacZ expression (Fig . 3) . The second phenotype, seen in strain 37, was more severe . It resulted in the accumulation of high levels of nitrite (Table 3) and significantly lower nirK-lacZ activity (Fig . 3) . The N-terminal region of PrrB (residues 1 to 182) is a six-helix, membrane-spanning domain, while the C-terminal region (residues 183 to 462) forms a cytoplasmic domain that has kinase and phosphatase activity (34) . Mutants with the less severe phenotype contain disruptions in the region predicted to encode the membrane-spanning domain of PrrB . Strain 37, the sole isolate displaying the severe phenotype, has an insertion at the codon for residue 283 of PrrB, which is predicted to lie within the cytoplasmic domain . While it is not clear why there are two distinct phenotypes for the PrrB mutants, it is interesting that the Tn5 was located in the 5' end of prrB for the mutants with a less severe phenotype whereas in strain 37 it was located in the center of the gene . The absence of PrrA also resulted in a severe effect on nitrite reductase expression . In the prrA background, nirK-lacZ expression was lower than in mutants containing insertions in the 5' region of the prrB open reading frame . This result is consistent with previous work studying the expression of the reaction center genes in strain 2.4.1 . In that work, Eraso and Kaplan observed that a PrrA strain experienced a more drastic decrease in puc and puf operon expression than did a PrrB strain (10) . The expression patterns for the various 2.4.3 PrrBA strains suggest that in those strains carrying insertions near the 5' end of prrB, sufficient PrrA-P is present to allow a modest level of nirK expression . In the absence of PrrA, there is a severe decrease in nirK expression, similar to that observed in a strain lacking NnrR (45) . The requirement for PrrA indicates that nirK expression will occur only under conditions where PrrA-P is present, irrespective of the activity of NnrR . Previous work has shown that PrrBA controls the expression of other terminal electron acceptors besides Nir . These include the cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase in 2.4.1 and R . capsulatus (31, 33, 43) and a ubiquinol oxidase in R . capsulatus (43) . Many processes regulated by PrrA share components of the electron transport chain . For instance, cytochrome c2 shuttles electrons between the cytochrome bc1 complex and the reaction center during photosynthesis, and it serves as an electron carrier for various respiratory processes (7, 17) . Placing the regulation of terminal electron acceptors under the control of a single global regulator creates a regulatory hierarchy, ensuring the presence of specific electron transport components and enzymes to maintain optimal metabolic activity (16, 33, 37) . Bioenergetically, respiration of oxygen is the preferred growth mode (56), but when oxygen tensions become lower, PrrA phosphorylation allows any number of genes involved in anaerobic growth to become poised for expression . Then, based on the availability of various factors (e.g., electron acceptors, light, ammonia levels, nitrogen oxides, etc.), additional regulatory elements become involved, ensuring the expression of the enzymes and electron carriers necessary for optimal growth . Recently, Emmerich et al . defined the imperfect repeat 5'-GCGGCNNNNNGTCGC-3' as a binding site for RegR, which is a PrrA homologue in Bradyrhizobium japonicum (9) . A similar site, 5'-G(C/T)G(G/C)G(G/C)ANN(T/A)(T/A)NNC(G/A)C-3', was defined by aligning the RegA-protected regions of R . capsulatus (43) . The nirK promoter region contains four sites that are similar to those listed above . Each site lies within a region between 50 and 160 bp upstream of the nirK transcriptional start (data not shown) . Truncation of the nirK promoter region indicates that DNA upstream of the predicted NnrR binding site is required for expression . This distinguishes nirK from the two other sets of genes in the NnrR regulon, the nor operon and nnrS, whose promoter regions can be truncated near the NnrR binding site with only limited loss of expression (2, 3) . The requirement for additional DNA upstream of the NnrR box is consistent with the regulation of nirK being more complex than that of other genes in the NnrR regulon . The observation that the nor promoter region can be truncated closer to the putative NnrR binding site than can the nirK promoter suggests that nor may not directly require PrrBA for expression . However, directly assessing nor expression in a PrrA mutant is difficult, because activation by NnrR requires the presence of NO (21), a molecule that is lacking in the Nir-deficient prrA background . Initial studies using an exogenous nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside, suggest that nor expression in a prrB mutant background is significantly more responsive to the presence of exogenous NO than is nirK expression (Laratta and Shapleigh, unpublished) . Moreover, unlike the nirK promoter region, the nor promoter has no sites with similarity to the imperfect repeats proposed as binding sites for PrrA homologues . Together, these observations suggest that the PrrA may not directly regulate norB expression . While it is obvious that PrrA-P is required for nirK expression, it is surprising that the inactivation of ccoN, which has been shown to result in expression of PrrA-P-regulated genes (31), prevents transcription of nirK . This suggests that under certain conditions, the PrrBA system might also repress nirK transcription, though it is not clear whether this is a direct or indirect effect . Interestingly, Fig . 3 shows that there is little expression of nirK under fully anaerobic dark conditions, even in the presence of N-oxides . The lack of oxygen in fully anaerobic cultures should physiologically mimic the deletion of the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase, thus providing an explanation of why there is limited expression of nirK under anaerobic, dark conditions . However, R . sphaeroides 2.4.3 has been reported to reduce nitrite when cultured under anaerobic light conditions (27) . This raises the question of why nirK is expressed anaerobically in the presence of light, but not in its absence . Previous observations suggest that during photosynthetic growth, reductant flows through the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase, although the substrate for the enzyme in the absence of oxygen has not been identified (30, 32) . Presumably, as long as there is some electron flow through the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase, enough of an inhibitory signal on PrrB exists to allow nirK expression . When the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase is inactive, either due to genetic disruption or under anaerobic dark conditions, the inhibitory signal is fully relaxed and nirK expression is impaired . With the data presented here, a tentative model integrating the PrrBA system in the expression of nirK can be postulated . Under aerobic conditions, when PrrA is in its unphosphorylated form, there is no expression from the nirK promoter . As oxygen tensions decrease, the kinase activity of PrrB increases relative to its phosphatase activity, resulting in an increase in the concentration of PrrA-P . Under these conditions, if nitric oxide is present, NnrR, together with PrrA-P, activates transcription of nirK . As conditions become more anaerobic or when the cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase is deleted, nirK-lacZ expression is repressed, though at this point it is not clear whether this is a direct or indirect result of PrrA-P accumulation . An important prediction for this model is that all other genes in the NnrR regulon are indirectly under the control of PrrBA, since their expression depends on nitrite reductase activity, which is directly regulated by PrrBA . Finally, the question of why nirK expression, and therefore denitrification, is regulated by PrrBA must be addressed . Elsen et al . suggest that during photosynthesis, RegBA, and by analogy PrrBA, control processes involved in the production and consumption of reducing equivalents, ensuring that the cell does not become overreduced (8) . During photosynthesis, the redox state of the ubiquinone pool must be optimally maintained to support cyclic electron transport, and anaerobic respiratory pathways provide a useful sink for excess reducing equivalents (15, 26, 38, 39) . Thus, the regulation of nirK by PrrBA suggests that the primary function of nitrogen oxide respiration is redox balancing rather than providing for robust growth as seen in many denitrifiers . This unique regulation distinguishes R . sphaeroides from other "true" denitrifiers whose regulation of nitrogen oxide reductases has been studied in detail . These bacteria use denitrification primarily to support anaerobic growth, and the regulation of their denitrification genes is consistent with this function .
This work was supported by the U.S . Department of Energy (95ER20206) .
What Is Staphylococcus Aureus?,
What is Food Microbiology?,
What Is Genetic Engineering?,
What Is Fermentation?,
What Is Salmonella?,
o,
Microbe,
s,
Bacterium,
r,
Microorganism,
s,
Bacteriology,
e,
Bacteria,
i,
Antimicrobial,
a,
Escherichia coli,
s,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Bactericidal,
c,
Candida albicans,
c,
Microorganisms,
s,
Escherichia coli,
r,
Microbiological,
n,
Agrobacterium,
e,
Gram negative,
n,
Staphylococcus,
n,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
c,
Bacteria,
n,
Staphylococcus aureus,
o,
Salmonella,
e,
Salmonella,
e,
Streptococcal,
a,
Pseudomonas,
a,
Escherichia coli,
e,
Enterobacteriacea,
a,
Microorganisms
|
© 2005
Transgalactic Ltd (manufacturer of Bioscreen C software) |
Privacy Statement | P.O. Box
1393, 00101 Helsinki, Finland,
Last modified: May 25, 2005
| ||||||